840:
that the "of the moment" editorials and screeds blaming a recently inaugurated president, or the superficial commentaries on the departing 8-year presidency of his predecessor, should be relegated to a minor paragraph to the effect of "political controversy and blame assignation" or some much better written title. All of the News Corp/Fox editorials and Paul
Krugman-style finger pointing are today historical footnotes and of no actual relevance to anything - they were sounds bites of the moment with no substance or evidence supporting them. The editors have done a passable job of presenting a "balance" of what are/were completely partisan political attacks, but it doesn't get to any real explanation of the great recession and market crash - it merely mitigates the hackery and bias of earlier, politically motivated authors. The article should be re-written to incorporate post-facto analysis and better research placing the great recession in historical context and providing a more analytical, fact-based analysis of its causes. With a full market recovery in evidence and both administrations' policies of 2007-2008 now history, it is timely for there to be a comprehensive re-write of this article.
770:
lacks a heading to set the tone of what appeared to be heavy partisanship bickering and a third bunch pointing to the facts rather than the politics. I feel the section still would be much too large if it was not broken up into points of view and would not let the reader see the three camps of views. Essentially, I'm saying that if we turn it into a volley of small juxt-apposed viewpoints, the reader will miss the heavy division between the two parties and the lack of bi-partisanship during this time.
193:
169:
766:
whole article entitled "Obama Bear Market". So I agree with you that the section (two equal signs), not the subsection (three equal signs) needs some cleanup now that this particular bear market is pretty much over. Please understand that if the market bounces and goes down from here, it's a new bear market. Either way, the new bull market (although it may be short) and perhaps the bear market that will follow is probably out of the context of this article.
292:
203:
85:
64:
345:
324:
95:
619:
to know or care that Obama took office over a year after it began; balance was applied swiftly and clumsily. By all means you're welcome to modify that section to reflect reality, but I'd repeat that
Knowledge (XXG) requires potentially contentious data points—and especially perspective on data—to be referenced. You and I both know there are plenty out there, so have at it!
33:
903:
815:
944:
706:
I took the liberty of editing that section, with references, for context. I'm a firm believer that when someone who publicly weighs in on an issue has a conflict of interest or other partisan ideology so deeply rooted as some of these politicians-cum-editorialists, you have to point out who they are
591:
That bullet point seems to me to be a poor selection as that act was largely to address the accounting abuses that led to the Enron scandal. One of the common criticisms of the Bush
Administration with regard to this bear market was a LACK of regulation and enforcement, not too much. Adding the SOx
839:
A central flaw in this article lies in its "of the moment" editorial nature. The sections on assigning blame - Bush v. Obama - are "of the moment" editorial commentaries. It is now over six years from the events of the article and we have seen the greatest market rebound in history. It would seem
734:
Certainly the section has significantly improved since I tagged it. I still have a couple of issues, however. It seems to have a disproportionate amount of coverage, with comments from all manner of individuals - many of whom have themselves received blame for the problem. Opinions from the likes of
1181:
As a
Knowledge (XXG) user, not an editor - I feel this entire section should either be deleted or at least moved to the bottom of the article. There are verifiable causes of the bear market and the opinions given are questionable and irrelevant. Some of the links are to opinion articles from biased
765:
I have to agree that the section blaming
President Barrack Obama is not proportionate with the the main stream view. Second, I agree that that section (#3) was mostly thrown out there by a different author than myself. I had written mostly the other two points (#1 and #2) of view to balance out a
618:
while using common sense and actual facts to mitigate, balance, or establish appropriate weight. This article began as a
Conservative Libertarian screed blaming the bear market on Obama (it was literally entitled "Obama Bear Market"), as the troublesome and biased editor who created it didn't seem
769:
As far as the cleanup goes from here, I have to agree with
Abrazame that these are editorials from individuals and not necessarily the whole newspaper. I do however subscribe to the theory that News Corp is often not as "fair and balanced" as their one TV outlet's catchphrase claims. The section
715:
and let people presume inherent bias on the part of staff writers if that's their wont, but it's another thing entirely to say "John Smith," even if you wikilink him, and not point out that he plays for the other team and was explicitly involved in this issue. It's a little like the whole
1182:
sources. This section, as presented, lowers the quality of the entire entry. A simple statement and explanation that there are competing theories placing blame on policies should suffice. I created an account just to post this, so forgive any lapse in proper wikipedia procedure.
735:
Jim Cramer do not seem particularly relevant, either. Another problem is that the section reads like a list of quotes, and lacks the better narrative flow of the previous section. Some of the stuff in this section (about Phil Gramm, for example), seems more appropriate for the
792:
level of the market in the introduction. A more generalized description that talks about when the bear market ended makes more sense, particularly because the current level of the DJIA is only about 500 points off from the level it was during Obama's inauguration. --
592:
Act seems to be out of place and a point of contention for the deregulation proponents. If the given reason, that capital fled U.S. markets is true, where did it go? Which competing economy benefited from any move of that capital?
707:
and illumine how they fit into the context of what they're opining on. Often this is done on the papers' editorial pages themselves, with a little bio of the guy, for precisely this sort of full disclosure. It's one thing to say
663:
Under the subsection
Blaming the Barack Obama administration - tagged it NPOV and commented "this section not neutral. Lots of opinion pieces by political opponsents and News Corp organs being used as sources" in the change log.
566:
during the crisis. That may or may not be regarded as a topic sufficiently notable to have its own page, though the 50% drop is certainly worthy of discussion somewhere. (It might be better to have a page on the bear market in
688:
news sources. It's pretty obvious that News Corp is pretty hard-right leaning in their news coverage. All of this controversy by the way has been scrubbed from their Wiki page. But that's POV#3 in this list.
1041:
716:
lobbyist-to-government official thing. I also added a section about the technical bull market we've just experienced, also with references. Perhaps
Scjessey would review my edits and remove this tag?
667:
The bigger picture is that the section is actually entitled
Opinions regarding the cause. It's divided into three sub-sections, each representing more-or-less the major viewpoints on the situation.
1230:
1051:
739:
section. Finally, I think that all three subheadings employ inappropriate characterizations, and I think that all three sections should be merged into a coherent narrative. That being said, this
399:
233:
1260:
692:
Please help me understand, is there a viewpoint #4 we are missing in the article? Or are you saying that News Corp should not be the only hard-right opinion grouped with viewpoint #3?
389:
1240:
306:
1265:
548:? It seems that each of these pages speak to the recent U.S. market, but each of these pages are being independently maintained and have differing (contradictory) information. --
365:
250:
1245:
1071:
743:
a substantial improvement on what was here before, and I would advocate removing this tag and instead going for a "cleanup"-related tag on the parent of the 3 sections. --
660:
Scjessey, ordinarily if you tag the article with an NPOV tag, you get to explain yourself here. But since the discussion is missing, I thought we would try to resolve it.
1225:
276:
1255:
1123:
1119:
1105:
1042:
http://web.archive.org/web/20090228123336/http://www.house.gov/htbin/blog_inc?BLOG,tx14_paul,blog,999,All,Item%20not%20found,ID=081124_2545,TEMPLATE=postingdetail.shtml
852:
update the graph to clearly show the peak, where the bear market was declared (20% down from the peak), where the market hit bottom, where the bull market was declared.
282:
891:
352:
329:
1235:
1021:
1052:
http://web.archive.org/web/20090307113627/http://www.foxnews.com:80/politics/first100days/2009/03/06/study-dow-decline-marks-fastest-new-president-nearly-century/
1045:
301:
240:
179:
151:
1250:
245:
1210:
141:
1055:
808:
I think since the context of this article (just this bear market) is now closed, I agree this needs to be reigned-in in order to clean up the article.
1005:
881:
865:
1220:
1215:
117:
216:
174:
1061:
1072:
http://web.archive.org/web/20110611052916/http://www.nasdaq.com/newscontent/20090310/Citigroup-Remarks-Boost-Stocks.aspx?storyid=19067452
1205:
642:
1031:
684:
And, yes, the majority of the blame on the Barack Obama administration even though he's barely been in office for one month comes from
599:
228:
545:
108:
69:
892:
http://web.archive.org/web/20090330193320/http://www.google.com:80/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gHs5OM3gFG_DytQQZFbWfgPT08MAD975VM282
1075:
224:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
1022:
http://web.archive.org/web/20080710042833/http://www.bloomberg.com:80/apps/news?pid=20601213&sid=aghpdCq8n9xo&refer=home
541:
1046:
http://www.house.gov/htbin/blog_inc?BLOG,tx14_paul,blog,999,All,Item%20not%20found,ID=081124_2545,TEMPLATE=postingdetail.shtml
44:
932:
895:
100:
849:
add to the table the date and data for when the market hit bottom and when the 20% uptick was seen to end the bear market
615:
1166:
951:
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the
1025:
936:
1056:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/03/06/study-dow-decline-marks-fastest-new-president-nearly-century/
571:
equities in that period, for example.) The page resulted from the merger of two competing articles on the subject.
464:
It's fine... The article is much more in balance now. It's not so one-sided as you had originally put it together.
1191:
1171:
991:
882:
http://web.archive.org/web/20081012121000/http://thecurrent.theatlantic.com:80/archives/2008/07/grammar-police.php
829:
802:
778:
752:
725:
700:
650:
628:
607:
580:
556:
526:
487:
473:
459:
445:
430:
514:
DJIA on inauguration day (Jan 20) open 8,279.63 March 5, 2009 close 6,594.44 (8279.63-6594.44)/8279.63 = 20.35%
1122:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
505:
50:
1157:
1013:
873:
646:
603:
595:
1062:
http://web.archive.org/web/20090317073629/http://www.mcclatchydc.com:80/staff/greg_gordon/story/63606.html
1141:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1129:
983:
963:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
915:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
885:
483:
455:
426:
364:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
116:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1187:
1012:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
872:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1096:
537:
208:
1032:
http://web.archive.org/web/20070730113157/http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2005/cr041405.htm
32:
717:
620:
291:
1183:
798:
748:
721:
624:
1126:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1065:
192:
168:
1142:
1076:
http://www.nasdaq.com/newscontent/20090310/Citigroup-Remarks-Boost-Stocks.aspx?storyid=19067452
964:
916:
576:
563:
553:
1035:
979:
685:
479:
451:
422:
1149:
971:
923:
639:
933:
http://web.archive.org/web/20090123033802/http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087
1108:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
896:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gHs5OM3gFG_DytQQZFbWfgPT08MAD975VM282
827:
776:
698:
522:
508:
469:
441:
1148:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1115:
970:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
922:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
17:
1199:
794:
744:
221:
1026:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601213&sid=aghpdCq8n9xo&refer=home
937:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aHOOUq_1HIfI&refer=home
572:
549:
84:
63:
504:
How did Bloomerg arrive at determining the bear market for Obama? Eric Martin:
478:
I'm the person who added the criticisms of Bush from Robert Reich and Ron Paul.
1114:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
788:←In an unrelated note, it seems like a bad idea to have information about the
361:
198:
90:
822:
771:
693:
518:
465:
437:
113:
220:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
344:
323:
94:
356:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
357:
910:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
886:
http://thecurrent.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/07/grammar-police.php
614:
Welcome! We dearly need editors with who can accurately represent
436:
I take it that you now see the evidence speak for itself? Thanks.
26:
1066:
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/staff/greg_gordon/story/63606.html
1081:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
640:
US STOCKS OUTLOOK:Bull Market Hinges On Public/Private Trust
290:
1036:
http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2005/cr041405.htm
1016:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
876:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1009:
869:
517:
The table shows only 17% because it is close to close.
1231:
C-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
374:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Finance & Investment
112:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1118:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
506:
Obama Bear Market’ Punishes Investors as Dow Slumps
281:This article has not yet received a rating on the
1261:Mid-importance Finance & Investment articles
450:The stuff that I added is still in the article.
1104:This message was posted before February 2018.
536:What is this article's purpose in relation to
1266:WikiProject Finance & Investment articles
1241:Low-importance United States History articles
377:Template:WikiProject Finance & Investment
8:
562:It is specifically about the behavior of US
1246:WikiProject United States History articles
318:
163:
58:
1256:C-Class Finance & Investment articles
1226:Unknown-importance United States articles
1004:I have just modified 6 external links on
864:I have just modified 3 external links on
674:Blaming the George W. Bush administration
261:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
677:Blaming the Barack Obama administration
320:
165:
60:
30:
1236:C-Class United States History articles
952:
681:You were looking at point of view #3.
1093:to let others know (documentation at
126:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Economics
7:
1006:United States bear market of 2007–09
866:United States bear market of 2007–09
353:WikiProject Finance & Investment
350:This article is within the scope of
214:This article is within the scope of
106:This article is within the scope of
49:It is of interest to the following
1251:WikiProject United States articles
264:Template:WikiProject United States
25:
1211:Low-importance Economics articles
1008:. Please take a moment to review
868:. Please take a moment to review
380:Finance & Investment articles
942:
901:
813:
343:
322:
201:
191:
167:
93:
83:
62:
31:
542:Global_financial_crisis_of_2008
394:This article has been rated as
146:This article has been rated as
1221:C-Class United States articles
1216:WikiProject Economics articles
629:22:29, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
608:05:22, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
129:Template:WikiProject Economics
1:
546:Financial crisis of 2007–2010
368:and see a list of open tasks.
299:This article is supported by
120:and see a list of open tasks.
101:Business and economics portal
1192:01:31, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
1177:Opinions regarding the cause
500:20% drop since inauguration?
1282:
1206:C-Class Economics articles
1135:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1001:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
861:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
830:15:59, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
811:
803:14:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
779:15:59, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
753:14:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
726:12:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
701:12:37, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
651:23:24, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
587:Sarbanes Oxley as a cause?
581:10:07, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
557:23:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
421:This article looks great!
417:Excellent job on the merge
400:project's importance scale
283:project's importance scale
152:project's importance scale
1172:14:03, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
992:02:57, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
527:05:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
488:11:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
474:21:53, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
460:15:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
446:14:20, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
431:13:18, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
393:
338:
298:
280:
217:WikiProject United States
186:
145:
78:
57:
371:Finance & Investment
330:Finance & Investment
302:WikiProject U.S. history
222:United States of America
997:External links modified
857:External links modified
295:
267:United States articles
39:This article is rated
18:Talk:Obama Bear Market
294:
109:WikiProject Economics
43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1116:regular verification
538:Late_2000s_recession
209:United States portal
1106:After February 2018
1085:parameter below to
709:Wall Street Journal
671:Blaming the economy
616:WP:Reliable sources
235:Articles Requested!
1160:InternetArchiveBot
1111:InternetArchiveBot
835:Historical Context
296:
132:Economics articles
45:content assessment
1136:
990:
598:comment added by
414:
413:
410:
409:
406:
405:
317:
316:
313:
312:
162:
161:
158:
157:
16:(Redirected from
1273:
1170:
1161:
1134:
1133:
1112:
1100:
986:
985:Talk to my owner
981:
954:
949:
946:
945:
908:
905:
904:
825:
817:
816:
774:
696:
686:News Corporation
610:
382:
381:
378:
375:
372:
347:
340:
339:
334:
326:
319:
269:
268:
265:
262:
259:
211:
206:
205:
204:
195:
188:
187:
182:
171:
164:
134:
133:
130:
127:
124:
103:
98:
97:
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
42:
36:
35:
27:
21:
1281:
1280:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1196:
1195:
1179:
1164:
1159:
1127:
1120:have permission
1110:
1094:
1014:this simple FaQ
999:
989:
984:
947:
943:
906:
902:
874:this simple FaQ
859:
846:
837:
823:
820:
819:
814:
772:
694:
658:
637:
593:
589:
534:
511:March 6, 2009.
502:
419:
379:
376:
373:
370:
369:
332:
266:
263:
260:
257:
256:
255:
241:Become a Member
207:
202:
200:
177:
131:
128:
125:
122:
121:
99:
92:
72:
40:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1279:
1277:
1269:
1268:
1263:
1258:
1253:
1248:
1243:
1238:
1233:
1228:
1223:
1218:
1213:
1208:
1198:
1197:
1178:
1175:
1154:
1153:
1146:
1079:
1078:
1070:Added archive
1068:
1060:Added archive
1058:
1050:Added archive
1048:
1040:Added archive
1038:
1030:Added archive
1028:
1020:Added archive
998:
995:
982:
976:
975:
968:
940:
939:
931:Added archive
928:
927:
920:
899:
898:
890:Added archive
888:
880:Added archive
858:
855:
854:
853:
850:
845:
842:
836:
833:
812:
810:
809:
786:
785:
784:
783:
782:
781:
767:
758:
757:
756:
755:
729:
728:
713:New York Times
679:
678:
675:
672:
657:
654:
636:
633:
632:
631:
588:
585:
584:
583:
533:
530:
501:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
418:
415:
412:
411:
408:
407:
404:
403:
396:Mid-importance
392:
386:
385:
383:
366:the discussion
348:
336:
335:
333:Mid‑importance
327:
315:
314:
311:
310:
307:Low-importance
297:
287:
286:
279:
273:
272:
270:
254:
253:
248:
243:
238:
231:
229:Template Usage
225:
213:
212:
196:
184:
183:
172:
160:
159:
156:
155:
148:Low-importance
144:
138:
137:
135:
118:the discussion
105:
104:
88:
76:
75:
73:Low‑importance
67:
55:
54:
48:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1278:
1267:
1264:
1262:
1259:
1257:
1254:
1252:
1249:
1247:
1244:
1242:
1239:
1237:
1234:
1232:
1229:
1227:
1224:
1222:
1219:
1217:
1214:
1212:
1209:
1207:
1204:
1203:
1201:
1194:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1176:
1174:
1173:
1168:
1163:
1162:
1151:
1147:
1144:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1131:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1107:
1102:
1098:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1002:
996:
994:
993:
987:
980:
973:
969:
966:
962:
961:
960:
959:
958:
938:
934:
930:
929:
925:
921:
918:
914:
913:
912:
911:
897:
893:
889:
887:
883:
879:
878:
877:
875:
871:
867:
862:
856:
851:
848:
847:
843:
841:
834:
832:
831:
828:
826:
807:
806:
805:
804:
800:
796:
791:
780:
777:
775:
768:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
759:
754:
750:
746:
742:
738:
733:
732:
731:
730:
727:
723:
719:
714:
710:
705:
704:
703:
702:
699:
697:
690:
687:
682:
676:
673:
670:
669:
668:
665:
661:
655:
653:
652:
648:
644:
643:65.161.188.11
641:
634:
630:
626:
622:
617:
613:
612:
611:
609:
605:
601:
597:
586:
582:
578:
574:
570:
565:
561:
560:
559:
558:
555:
551:
547:
543:
539:
531:
529:
528:
524:
520:
515:
512:
510:
507:
499:
489:
485:
481:
477:
476:
475:
471:
467:
463:
462:
461:
457:
453:
449:
448:
447:
443:
439:
435:
434:
433:
432:
428:
424:
416:
401:
397:
391:
388:
387:
384:
367:
363:
359:
355:
354:
349:
346:
342:
341:
337:
331:
328:
325:
321:
308:
305:(assessed as
304:
303:
293:
289:
288:
284:
278:
275:
274:
271:
258:United States
252:
249:
247:
244:
242:
239:
237:
236:
232:
230:
227:
226:
223:
219:
218:
210:
199:
197:
194:
190:
189:
185:
181:
176:
175:United States
173:
170:
166:
153:
149:
143:
140:
139:
136:
119:
115:
111:
110:
102:
96:
91:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
34:
29:
28:
19:
1180:
1158:
1155:
1130:source check
1109:
1103:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1080:
1003:
1000:
977:
956:
950:
941:
909:
900:
863:
860:
838:
821:
789:
787:
740:
736:
712:
708:
691:
683:
680:
666:
662:
659:
656:NPOV Dispute
638:
635:Bear Market?
600:75.54.85.177
590:
568:
535:
516:
513:
503:
420:
395:
351:
300:
246:Project Talk
234:
215:
147:
107:
51:WikiProjects
1097:Sourcecheck
594:—Preceding
480:Grundle2600
452:Grundle2600
423:Grundle2600
1200:Categories
1167:Report bug
362:Investment
1150:this tool
1143:this tool
972:this tool
965:this tool
953:|checked=
924:this tool
917:this tool
509:Bloomberg
123:Economics
114:Economics
70:Economics
1156:Cheers.—
978:Cheers.—
818:Resolved
795:Scjessey
745:Scjessey
737:previous
718:Abrazame
621:Abrazame
596:unsigned
564:equities
532:Purpose?
1184:Dugalug
1083:checked
1010:my edit
988::Online
870:my edit
790:current
573:Mporter
550:guyzero
398:on the
358:Finance
180:History
150:on the
41:C-class
1091:failed
251:Alerts
47:scale.
844:To do
569:world
1188:talk
1087:true
957:true
824:kgrr
799:talk
773:kgrr
749:talk
722:talk
695:kgrr
647:talk
625:talk
604:talk
577:talk
554:talk
544:and
523:talk
519:Kgrr
484:talk
470:talk
466:Kgrr
456:talk
442:talk
438:Kgrr
427:talk
360:and
1124:RfC
1101:).
1089:or
1074:to
1064:to
1054:to
1044:to
1034:to
1024:to
955:to
935:to
894:to
884:to
711:or
390:Mid
277:???
142:Low
1202::
1190:)
1137:.
1132:}}
1128:{{
1099:}}
1095:{{
801:)
751:)
741:is
724:)
649:)
627:)
606:)
579:)
552:|
540:,
525:)
486:)
472:)
458:)
444:)
429:)
309:).
178::
1186:(
1169:)
1165:(
1152:.
1145:.
974:.
967:.
948:N
926:.
919:.
907:Y
797:(
747:(
720:(
645:(
623:(
602:(
575:(
521:(
482:(
468:(
454:(
440:(
425:(
402:.
285:.
154:.
53::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
