Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Annexation of Hyderabad

Source 📝

1287:), you replaced content sourced to reliable secondary sources with extensive Nehru quotes that actually substantively change the meaning of the content. It is unclear why you made these changes. It is one thing to add new content, and it would be bad enough if the new content was lengthy primary source quotes subbing for secondary source analysis, but quite another to do this with primary source quotes that don't make the same point. And I don't even necessarily mean "make the same point" in terms of POV issues; I mean the old paragraph and the new one are just straight up talking about different, or contradictory, things. In this paragraph, for instance, the original content pointed out two important things: first, that Nehru was reluctant to attack due to fear of Pakistani intervention; and second, that such fears were fundamentally misplaced, as Pakistan had no such plans. The replacement text consists of a quote (that is frankly largely fluff) in which Nehru expresses something closer to the 450: 482: 418: 173: 576: 197: 434: 303: 95: 64: 33: 105: 375: 364: 353: 342: 261: 229: 331: 1314:
Please note that the purpose of my revert was not to keep you from ever including any of the content you added in the article. You should tighten up the Nehru quotes, and supplement them with secondary sources that critically evaluate them; then I will have no objection. I can help with fixing the CE
1275:
issues such quotes can introduce to the article. Nehru is about as far from an impartial source as there could be on this topic, even if he weren't a primary source. Uncritically relying on such quotes without secondary source evaluations is a recipe for a poor, likely biased article. And again— this
661:
The real report was published for the first time in the 2014 book of Noorani. He got the original from the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, which is the only copy known to exist. Since it wasn't a government report there were no copies anywhere else, except perhaps with the authors and Sardar Patel
854:
overtook the remaining eight. Out of these again the worst sufferers have been the districts of Osmanabad, Gulburga, Bider and Nander, in which four the number of people killed during and after the police action was not less, if not more than 18,000. In the other four districts viz. Aurangabad, Bir,
728:
This is just another balatant attempt to cover up the atrocities committed in Hyderabad during annexation. Terming whatever comes against 'Pakistani propaganda' is totally unfair but it has been normalised on Knowledge (XXG) over the years. I think some neutral editors should look into this. Pinging
644:
the {{unreliable source?}} for the BBC News article on the Sunderlal Report. I had forgotten why this tag was added back in 2017 and had to refresh my memory. It was because the BBC News had put up the fake Pakistani propaganda version of the report in its image. The write-up was fine, but the image
1310:
higher quality, secondary source content. Additionally, this is not the only problem with it: a number of edits you seem to have effected for stylistic or CE reasons actually had the opposite effect, and resulted in prose that was either non-standard/non-idiomatic or stylistically just worse. This
1333:
I removed what couldn't be verified or it was entirely undue and added the essential information. Instead of dedicating various sentences to that point, I simply made it "It was also believed that there could be a possible military response by Pakistan" which is accurate and does not enforce any
652:
Before the Military Action (i.e., before 13 September 1948) the general situation in the state was peaceful. However, in the districts of Nalgonda and Warangal the Communists were active, and the Razakars (volunteers belong to the MIM) were involved in crimes in the villages bordering Indian
870:
Also, even if it were true that the BBC had commited this error initially, if they fixed the image, as you claim, how exactly does it remain an unreliable source? Especially given that you removed the citation even in places where it was used without reference to the image at all?
1315:
related issues as well if I see you are willing to work on the former task. But if you are unwilling or unable to do this in the near future, I think the article is better off remaining in its prior state until such time as you are able to compose a better set of changes.
754:
to just two things, one of which is "Retributive violence", which uncritically reproduces the Hindutva apologetic that "the Muslims had it coming" while ignoring the vast body of scholarship that challenges this assertion. Can you imagine if the article for
1306:. "Mainly non quote text" is not an accurate characterization of your edits. I would say easily half, perhaps closer to 60-70% of your edits consists of excessively long Nehru quotations; this is exacerbated by the fact that some of these quotes 457: 247: 657:
The real report says nothing of the sort. Somebody just cooked up whatever they wanted to say, and produced a report look-alike to fool the world. I suppose this will remain as a perennial proof of the kind of games Pakistan plays.
441: 243: 425: 239: 1243:
cycle, when your edits are challenged via a revert (with an explanation), you are supposed to take it to the talk page, but I'm not going to get into an edit war with you. I will instead respond to your edit summary here.
1192:) has been making major changes regarding the wording of the article. Before more changes are made, I would like to ask them to discuss the changes here on the talk page so that consensus can be reached. Remember that 818:
It was because the BBC News had put up the fake Pakistani propaganda version of the report in its image. The write-up was fine, but the image was that of the fake report. (BBC has now fixed the image.)
1318:
Also, for future reference, it's better to break up your edits rather than making one giant edit; this makes it easier for users to revert less helpful edits while retaining more useful changes.
1387: 1452: 763:
claimed that German violence was "retributive"? They have also conspired to remove categorization of the events as genocide, even though multiple reliable sources have made this claim.
1447: 1407: 1251:. This is strictly true, in that Knowledge (XXG) policies are rarely formulated as strict prohibitions. However, Knowledge (XXG) warns against excessive reliance on quotes (see 1442: 750:
for the crimes committed against them— as an example of the latter, over the course of several years Kautilya3 and pals have slowly wittled down the "Goals" in the infobox of
316: 273: 1432: 1372: 1311:
issue by itself would not warrant reversion, but combined with the other issues I pointed out, I felt that, on balance, reverting your edit was the best course of action.
1437: 986: 1427: 1271:
sources. The reasons for this are numerous; I suggest you read the articles I've linked outlining these policies and guidelines, but of special relevance here is the
302: 665:
The reason I am bringing this up now is that William Dalrymple apparently used the same fake report in his book. The book is being cited and sourced in the article:
1382: 187: 860:
We can say at a very conservative estimate that in the whole state at least 27 thousand to 40 thousand people lost their lives during and after the police action.
1338:) in the entire article and both were added by me. That's why you don't have to go after them by saying that the article "already" has a problem with quotation. 1392: 1276:
is not the only issue with excessive primary source quotation; I'm not here to rewrite the contents of the pages I linked earlier, so please refer to them.
1402: 833: 211: 1422: 742:
It's very regrettable that nothing was done about this and that Kautilya3's tendentious edits were allowed to go into effect, not just here but also at
865:
So exactly what are you referring to? Can you provide an archived version of the BBC article that references the fake version of the report in any way?
849:
Notably, a verbatim copy of the exact same text as in the image can be found in the version of the report published in Appendix 14 of Noorani's book:
268: 234: 163: 1377: 1412: 1367: 153: 182: 74: 592: 449: 940: 277: 1299:. However, for reasons that remain unexplained by you and opaque to me, the part about how such fears were unsubstantiated is just deleted. 1189: 971:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1417: 1397: 1295:, with no mention of concerns about a Pakistani intervention. After this, your version does contain the briefest mention of this issue: 1009: 206: 78: 689: 792:
Would you be ok as dismissing the report by the Indian government as "pro-Indian propaganda"? Does the Knowledge (XXG) article on
796:
dismiss Allied estimates of the death toll as "Allied propaganda"? I can't think of any other instances where estimates reckoned
487:
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
1362: 44: 912: 800:(the Indian government) are somehow taken as inherently more reliable than those of other countries, even "enemy" countries. 549: 128: 118: 69: 1170:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
837: 670: 1233:(as well as some purely CE-related edits I made subsequently) which was itself a revert of a few of your edits, chiefly 1040:
there is a mixture of title conventions. The current title is not ambiguous so there's no real need for a longer title.
825: 962: 648:
The Pakistani version still exists. It has been printed in full in Omar Khalidi's book. It starts with the paragraph:
625: 1323: 1045: 876: 805: 779: 604: 1183: 1256: 972: 50: 1005: 272:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a 1133:: unless there is another example of an annexation of Hyderabad, there is no need for the disambiguation. 1066: 1058:
The title is incomplete. It is about "Annexation of Hyderabad", but doesn't mention "annexation by whom"?
1020: 719: 1264: 1252: 1179: 1319: 1120: 1107: 1086: 1041: 872: 801: 775: 1268: 771: 730: 1343: 1260: 32: 1282: 1197: 1156: 1094: 1037: 975:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
751: 743: 704: 1263:
sources, as your Nehru quotes are; Knowledge (XXG) articles should primarily be based on reliable
746:. The result is an article that severely downplays the extent of the atrocities, and in fact even 610: 1111: 714:
Support removal of Dalrymple. He is far from an expert in this area. And, the error is obvious.
1061: 1015: 995: 937: 909: 715: 686: 674: 1272: 1193: 1141: 1115: 653:
provinces such as in Nanded and Aurangabad. Instances of murder and kidnapping were rare....
606: 575: 417: 1240: 172: 1339: 1216: 829: 682: 1152: 1090: 700: 1279:
Also, in some cases (for example, with the paragraph that in your version starts with
196: 1356: 927: 793: 756: 1347: 1327: 1203: 1160: 1143: 1125: 1098: 1073: 1049: 1027: 999: 991: 931: 903: 899: 880: 809: 783: 737: 723: 708: 608: 110: 17: 1114:. The current title is descriptive, recognizable, concise, and natural enough. -- 1297:
It was also believed that there could be a possible military response by Pakistan
1134: 767: 734: 774:— both these articles are genocide-apologetic travesties as currently written. 433: 100: 841: 855:
Nalgunda and Medak those who lost their lives numbered at least 5 thousand.
94: 63: 488: 1291:
sentiment as what the original content suggested: he states instead that
1259:). Excessive quotation is especially problematic when such quotes are 126:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the 260: 228: 123: 1012:– better descriptive title, consistent with other such articles. 760: 546:
RM, Indian integration of Hyderabad → Integration of Hyderabad,
611: 569: 476: 26: 645:
was that of the fake report. (BBC has now fixed the image.)
448: 432: 416: 301: 195: 171: 1267:
sources, with occasional supplementation from primary and
908:, Wichita, Kansas: Hyderabad Historical Society, p. 100, 1059: 1013: 1235: 1229: 1223: 1194:
Knowledge (XXG) is written from a neutral point of view
641: 513: 508: 503: 536:
RM, Operation Polo → Indian integration of Hyderabad,
122:, which aims to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of 798:
by the very government responsible for the atrocities
314:
This article has been checked against the following
554: 399: 313: 828:is the earliest version of the BBC article on the 1388:C-Class Indian history articles of Mid-importance 1337:There are only 2 quotes (with <blockquote: --> 1453:South Asian military history task force articles 1304:did blanket revert against mainly non-quote text 1010:Annexation of Hyderabad by the Dominion of India 526:RM, Hyderabad Campaign (1948) → Operation Polo, 1209:Recent edits— over quotation and other problems 852: 816: 679:The Age of Kali: Indian Travels and Encounters 1448:C-Class South Asian military history articles 1408:C-Class Hyderabad articles of High-importance 1302:Next, you claimed in the edit summary that I 662:(who was the other recipient of the report). 650: 619:This page has archives. Sections older than 8: 286:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history 1443:Indian military history task force articles 1433:Asian military history task force articles 961:The following is a closed discussion of a 396: 310: 223: 58: 1373:C-Class India articles of High-importance 1438:C-Class Indian military history articles 842:the current, live version of the article 266:This article is within the scope of the 1428:C-Class Asian military history articles 891: 458:South Asian military history task force 225: 60: 30: 1383:Mid-importance Indian history articles 1303: 1296: 1292: 1280: 1248: 629:when more than 4 sections are present. 276:. To use this banner, please see the 541: 289:Template:WikiProject Military history 7: 980:The result of the move request was: 116:This article is within the scope of 1393:WikiProject Indian history articles 531: 49:It is of interest to the following 1403:High-importance Hyderabad articles 442:Indian military history task force 25: 1423:C-Class military history articles 1293:Military action becomes essential 623:may be automatically archived by 426:Asian military history task force 138:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject India 1249:here is no prohibition on quotes 1239:. I'd like to note that per the 1166:The discussion above is closed. 574: 480: 373: 362: 351: 340: 329: 259: 227: 103: 93: 62: 31: 1378:C-Class Indian history articles 555:#Requested move 16 October 2016 514:Indian integration of Hyderabad 158:This article has been rated as 1413:WikiProject Hyderabad articles 1368:High-importance India articles 550:Indian annexation of Hyderabad 1: 954:Requested move 15 August 2021 640:You would notice that I have 204:This article is supported by 180:This article is supported by 933:The Destruction of Hyderabad 699:Should we get rid of it? -- 269:Military history WikiProject 183:the Indian history workgroup 1161:07:54, 17 August 2021 (UTC) 1151:unnecessary disambiguation 1144:22:39, 16 August 2021 (UTC) 1126:09:09, 16 August 2021 (UTC) 1099:03:05, 16 August 2021 (UTC) 1074:02:30, 16 August 2021 (UTC) 1050:00:22, 16 August 2021 (UTC) 1028:19:58, 15 August 2021 (UTC) 1000:00:24, 23 August 2021 (UTC) 636:Pakistani propaganda report 1469: 1418:WikiProject India articles 1398:C-Class Hyderabad articles 1348:05:08, 15 March 2024 (UTC) 1328:04:59, 15 March 2024 (UTC) 881:09:08, 10 March 2024 (UTC) 724:15:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC) 334:Referencing and citation: 164:project's importance scale 141:Template:WikiProject India 905:Hyderabad, after the fall 810:01:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC) 784:01:49, 5 March 2024 (UTC) 709:02:32, 2 March 2021 (UTC) 504:Hyderabad Campaign (1948) 456: 440: 424: 395: 292:military history articles 254: 203: 179: 157: 88: 57: 1204:16:10, 4 June 2023 (UTC) 1175:Major changes of wording 1168:Please do not modify it. 968:Please do not modify it. 836:it has of the report is 738:12:47, 26 May 2021 (UTC) 1006:Annexation of Hyderabad 400:Associated task forces: 345:Coverage and accuracy: 1363:C-Class India articles 1281:Nehru, in a letter to 1247:First, you state that 862: 820: 675:"Under the Char Minar" 655: 626:Lowercase sigmabot III 453: 437: 421: 378:Supporting materials: 306: 200: 176: 39:This article is rated 832:. You will note that 492:Logs and discussions: 452: 436: 420: 305: 207:WikiProject Hyderabad 199: 175: 43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 540:, 3 September 2014, 1038:Category:Annexation 752:Hyderabad massacres 744:Hyderabad massacres 553:, 25 October 2016, 367:Grammar and style: 320:for B-class status: 18:Talk:Operation Polo 936:, Hurst & Co, 748:blames the victims 671:Dalrymple, William 454: 438: 422: 307: 274:list of open tasks 201: 177: 45:content assessment 1124: 990: 987:non-admin closure 942:978-1-84904-439-4 772:Fowler&fowler 731:Fowler&fowler 633: 632: 598: 597: 566: 565: 562: 561: 542:#Requested move 2 475: 474: 471: 470: 467: 466: 463: 462: 391: 390: 336:criterion not met 278:full instructions 222: 221: 218: 217: 119:WikiProject India 16:(Redirected from 1460: 1320:Brusquedandelion 1238: 1232: 1226: 1220: 1139: 1118: 1108:Ivar the Boneful 1087:Ivar the Boneful 1072: 1069: 1064: 1042:Ivar the Boneful 1026: 1023: 1018: 984: 970: 946: 945: 924: 918: 917: 896: 873:Brusquedandelion 802:Brusquedandelion 776:Brusquedandelion 695: 628: 612: 589: 588: 578: 570: 489: 484: 483: 477: 407: 397: 381: 377: 376: 370: 366: 365: 359: 355: 354: 348: 344: 343: 337: 333: 332: 311: 294: 293: 290: 287: 284: 283:Military history 263: 256: 255: 250: 235:Military history 231: 224: 146: 145: 142: 139: 136: 113: 108: 107: 106: 97: 90: 89: 84: 81: 66: 59: 42: 36: 35: 27: 21: 1468: 1467: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1353: 1352: 1234: 1228: 1222: 1214: 1211: 1202: 1177: 1172: 1171: 1135: 1067: 1062: 1021: 1016: 966: 956: 951: 950: 949: 943: 926: 925: 921: 915: 898: 897: 893: 830:Wayback Machine 766:Pinging again @ 692: 669: 638: 624: 613: 607: 583: 532:#Requested move 530:, 2 June 2011, 518: 481: 405: 379: 374: 368: 363: 357: 352: 346: 341: 335: 330: 291: 288: 285: 282: 281: 237: 212:High-importance 160:High-importance 143: 140: 137: 134: 133: 109: 104: 102: 83:High‑importance 82: 72: 40: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1466: 1464: 1456: 1455: 1450: 1445: 1440: 1435: 1430: 1425: 1420: 1415: 1410: 1405: 1400: 1395: 1390: 1385: 1380: 1375: 1370: 1365: 1355: 1354: 1351: 1350: 1335: 1257:WP:OVERQUOTING 1210: 1207: 1201: 1198:Edward-Woodrow 1180:182.48.219.128 1176: 1173: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1146: 1128: 1101: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1053: 1052: 1003: 978: 977: 963:requested move 957: 955: 952: 948: 947: 941: 928:Noorani, A. G. 919: 913: 890: 889: 885: 884: 883: 867: 866: 851: 850: 846: 845: 822: 821: 813: 812: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 764: 697: 696: 690: 637: 634: 631: 630: 618: 615: 614: 609: 605: 603: 600: 599: 596: 595: 585: 584: 579: 573: 564: 563: 560: 559: 558: 557: 544: 534: 517: 516: 511: 509:Operation Polo 506: 497: 494: 493: 485: 473: 472: 469: 468: 465: 464: 461: 460: 455: 445: 444: 439: 429: 428: 423: 413: 412: 410: 408: 402: 401: 393: 392: 389: 388: 386: 384: 383: 382: 371: 360: 349: 338: 324: 323: 321: 308: 298: 297: 295: 264: 252: 251: 232: 220: 219: 216: 215: 202: 192: 191: 188:Mid-importance 178: 168: 167: 156: 150: 149: 147: 144:India articles 115: 114: 98: 86: 85: 67: 55: 54: 48: 37: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1465: 1454: 1451: 1449: 1446: 1444: 1441: 1439: 1436: 1434: 1431: 1429: 1426: 1424: 1421: 1419: 1416: 1414: 1411: 1409: 1406: 1404: 1401: 1399: 1396: 1394: 1391: 1389: 1386: 1384: 1381: 1379: 1376: 1374: 1371: 1369: 1366: 1364: 1361: 1360: 1358: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1336: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1316: 1312: 1309: 1305: 1300: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1284: 1277: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1245: 1242: 1237: 1231: 1225: 1218: 1208: 1206: 1205: 1199: 1196:. Thank-you, 1195: 1191: 1188: 1185: 1181: 1174: 1169: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1147: 1145: 1142: 1140: 1138: 1132: 1129: 1127: 1122: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1102: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1081: 1080: 1075: 1071: 1070: 1065: 1063:Peter Ormond 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1025: 1024: 1019: 1017:Peter Ormond 1011: 1007: 1002: 1001: 997: 993: 988: 983: 976: 974: 969: 964: 959: 958: 953: 944: 939: 935: 934: 929: 923: 920: 916: 911: 907: 906: 901: 900:Khalidi, Omar 895: 892: 888: 882: 878: 874: 869: 868: 864: 863: 861: 858: 856: 848: 847: 843: 839: 835: 831: 827: 824: 823: 819: 815: 814: 811: 807: 803: 799: 795: 794:The Holocaust 791: 785: 781: 777: 773: 769: 765: 762: 758: 757:The Holocaust 753: 749: 745: 741: 740: 739: 736: 732: 727: 726: 725: 721: 717: 713: 712: 711: 710: 706: 702: 693: 691:9780143031093 688: 684: 680: 676: 672: 668: 667: 666: 663: 659: 654: 649: 646: 643: 635: 627: 622: 617: 616: 602: 601: 594: 591: 590: 587: 586: 582: 577: 572: 571: 568: 556: 552: 551: 545: 543: 539: 535: 533: 529: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521:Discussions: 515: 512: 510: 507: 505: 502: 499: 498: 496: 495: 491: 490: 486: 479: 478: 459: 451: 447: 446: 443: 435: 431: 430: 427: 419: 415: 414: 411: 409: 404: 403: 398: 394: 387: 385: 380:criterion met 372: 369:criterion met 361: 358:criterion met 350: 347:criterion met 339: 328: 327: 326: 325: 322: 319: 318: 312: 309: 304: 300: 299: 296: 279: 275: 271: 270: 265: 262: 258: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 236: 233: 230: 226: 213: 210:(assessed as 209: 208: 198: 194: 193: 189: 186:(assessed as 185: 184: 174: 170: 169: 165: 161: 155: 152: 151: 148: 131: 130: 125: 121: 120: 112: 101: 99: 96: 92: 91: 87: 80: 76: 71: 68: 65: 61: 56: 52: 46: 38: 34: 29: 28: 19: 1317: 1313: 1307: 1301: 1288: 1278: 1265:WP:SECONDARY 1253:WP:OVERQUOTE 1246: 1224:you reverted 1212: 1186: 1178: 1167: 1153:-- DaxServer 1148: 1136: 1130: 1103: 1082: 1060: 1033: 1014: 1004: 981: 979: 967: 960: 932: 922: 904: 894: 886: 859: 857: 853: 838:the same one 817: 797: 747: 716:TrangaBellam 698: 678: 664: 660: 656: 651: 647: 639: 620: 580: 567: 547: 537: 527: 520: 519: 500: 315: 267: 205: 181: 159: 129:project page 127: 117: 111:India portal 51:WikiProjects 1283:V. K. Menon 1269:WP:TERTIARY 1116:RegentsPark 973:move review 840:that is on 501:Move logs: 356:Structure: 1357:Categories 1340:Capitals00 1261:WP:PRIMARY 1217:Capitals00 982:Not moved. 914:093081102X 887:References 248:South Asia 1334:validity. 1091:Kautilya3 834:the image 701:Kautilya3 673:(2004) . 593:Archive 1 548:Moved to 79:Hyderabad 1308:replaced 1289:opposite 1236:this one 1190:contribs 1112:WP:TITLE 930:(2014), 902:(1988), 759:or even 581:Archives 317:criteria 1273:WP:NPOV 1137:Bait30 1121:comment 992:Natg 19 642:removed 621:90 days 162:on the 75:History 41:C-class 1241:WP:BRD 1221:I see 1149:Oppose 1131:Oppose 1104:Oppose 1085:- Per 1083:Oppose 1036:. Per 1034:Oppose 768:USaamo 735:USaamo 681:. pp. 244:Indian 47:scale. 1213:Dear 1089:. -- 770:and @ 538:Moved 528:Moved 240:Asian 135:India 124:India 70:India 1344:talk 1324:talk 1255:and 1230:edit 1184:talk 1157:talk 1110:and 1106:Per 1095:talk 1046:talk 996:talk 938:ISBN 910:ISBN 877:talk 826:This 806:talk 780:talk 761:WWII 733:... 720:talk 705:talk 687:ISBN 154:High 1285:... 1227:my 1200::) 683:210 1359:: 1346:) 1326:) 1159:) 1097:) 1068:💬 1048:) 1022:💬 1008:→ 998:) 965:. 879:) 808:) 782:) 722:) 707:) 685:. 677:. 406:/ 246:/ 242:/ 238:: 214:). 190:). 77:/ 73:: 1342:( 1322:( 1219:: 1215:@ 1187:· 1182:( 1155:( 1123:) 1119:( 1093:( 1044:( 994:( 989:) 985:( 875:( 844:. 804:( 778:( 718:( 703:( 694:. 280:. 166:. 132:. 53:: 20:)

Index

Talk:Operation Polo

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
India
History
Hyderabad
WikiProject icon
India portal
WikiProject India
India
project page
High
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
the Indian history workgroup
Mid-importance
Taskforce icon
WikiProject Hyderabad
High-importance
WikiProject icon
Military history
Asian
Indian
South Asia
WikiProject icon
Military history WikiProject
list of open tasks
full instructions

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.