451:, usually "drive-by", contributors keep trying to add it. There is a difference. There is also no useful purpose in comparing this article's content with that of any other article because each situation is different and has to be considered on its own merits. In this particular instance, the "controversy" was clearly manufactured for the reasons I set out above - it had no valid legal basis from the outset because they were targeting the wrong party, and the reason they were doing that was because the party in question had gained an oh-so-brief moment of fame and so someone saw a chance to jump on thr bandwagon with more communal nonsense. Her biographical article was deleted due to the brevity also. I suspect you are aware that these manufactured "outrages" are two-a-penny in India, a society where protests are common and often irrational. -
280:
147:
22:
77:
53:
202:
175:
87:
212:
341:
We do not do dedicated "Controversy" sections and this was a manufactured controversy. We shouldn't encourage fly-by-night fringe communalism that has no lasting effect, as here. That is why I just removed it and it is why I will remove it again unless someone comes up with something more substantial
479:
The release date keeps changing and, worse, people keep adding dates here without sources. We know that the actual release has changed several times and we know that Indian film people go bananas trying to use
Knowledge to publicise their ventures, so let's just wait until it actually happens and
335:
I realise that the above thread cannot be seen now. However, the fact remains that the FIR was just an opportunist stunt aimed at gaining publicity on the back of the viral video featuring
Varrier. She was the subject of the FIR, not the film, and it was ludicrous because the claim was that the
412:
I did, but other articles too have a section about controversy. So I don't see why anyone is removing it. And while you're talking about multiple users, isn't it true multiple users have attempted to add it? There seems consensus. So stop acting the master.
342:
than "it happened and the newspapers reported it". It has already been established at numerous BLP AfDs relating to the various actors that the news media completely lost their heads on this one. -
543:
533:
289:
185:
156:
63:
538:
294:
548:
508:
513:
528:
270:
260:
553:
523:
518:
503:
105:
316:
Before adding anything about the FIR/police/controversy here relating to alleged anti-Muslim bias, please note the thread at
117:
109:
33:
235:
225:
180:
336:
song's lyrics insulted
Muslims - since she didn't actually sing in the song, it would have been impossible to uphold.
317:
113:
100:
58:
21:
418:
365:
39:
414:
361:
279:
360:
I don't know why people keep removing the controversy part. Many films have controversies mentioned.
383:
386:
might also be useful because other people have removed attempts to insert such a section. ~-
485:
456:
391:
347:
325:
146:
497:
217:
104:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can
481:
452:
387:
343:
321:
92:
207:
82:
76:
52:
382:
Did you read the comments immediately preceding your own? I think a read of
201:
174:
121:
489:
460:
422:
395:
369:
351:
329:
233:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the
230:
447:
contributors have indicated it is not of signficance; multiple
15:
278:
145:
544:
Start-Class Indian cinema articles of Low-importance
320:, which applies here as much as for that article. -
229:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of
120:. To improve this article, please refer to the
318:Talk:Priya_Prakash_Varrier#Controversy_section
8:
534:Start-Class India articles of Low-importance
19:
169:
116:. To use this banner, please refer to the
47:
171:
49:
539:Low-importance Indian cinema articles
480:then add the date retrospectively. -
7:
223:This article is within the scope of
98:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
549:WikiProject Indian cinema articles
509:Start-Class Indian cinema articles
14:
514:Indian cinema task force articles
154:This article is supported by the
210:
200:
173:
114:regional and topical task forces
85:
75:
51:
20:
265:This article has been rated as
1:
529:Low-importance India articles
352:10:46, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
330:21:31, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
287:This article is supported by
490:09:34, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
290:the Indian cinema workgroup
245:Knowledge:WikiProject India
570:
554:WikiProject India articles
524:Start-Class India articles
461:16:23, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
423:12:28, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
396:10:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
370:07:07, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
271:project's importance scale
248:Template:WikiProject India
130:Knowledge:WikiProject Film
519:WikiProject Film articles
504:Start-Class film articles
286:
264:
195:
153:
133:Template:WikiProject Film
70:
46:
157:Indian cinema task force
312:FIR/police/controversy
283:
150:
28:This article is rated
282:
149:
106:join the discussion
284:
151:
34:content assessment
309:
308:
305:
304:
301:
300:
226:WikiProject India
168:
167:
164:
163:
108:and see lists of
561:
253:
252:
249:
246:
243:
220:
215:
214:
213:
204:
197:
196:
191:
188:
177:
170:
138:
137:
134:
131:
128:
101:WikiProject Film
95:
90:
89:
88:
79:
72:
71:
66:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
569:
568:
564:
563:
562:
560:
559:
558:
494:
493:
477:
314:
250:
247:
244:
241:
240:
216:
211:
209:
189:
183:
135:
132:
129:
126:
125:
91:
86:
84:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
567:
565:
557:
556:
551:
546:
541:
536:
531:
526:
521:
516:
511:
506:
496:
495:
476:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
375:
374:
373:
372:
355:
354:
338:
337:
313:
310:
307:
306:
303:
302:
299:
298:
295:Low-importance
285:
275:
274:
267:Low-importance
263:
257:
256:
254:
251:India articles
222:
221:
205:
193:
192:
190:Low‑importance
178:
166:
165:
162:
161:
152:
142:
141:
139:
97:
96:
80:
68:
67:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
566:
555:
552:
550:
547:
545:
542:
540:
537:
535:
532:
530:
527:
525:
522:
520:
517:
515:
512:
510:
507:
505:
502:
501:
499:
492:
491:
487:
483:
474:
462:
458:
454:
450:
449:inexperienced
446:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
424:
420:
416:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
371:
367:
363:
359:
358:
357:
356:
353:
349:
345:
340:
339:
334:
333:
332:
331:
327:
323:
319:
311:
296:
293:(assessed as
292:
291:
281:
277:
276:
272:
268:
262:
259:
258:
255:
238:
237:
232:
228:
227:
219:
208:
206:
203:
199:
198:
194:
187:
182:
179:
176:
172:
159:
158:
148:
144:
143:
140:
136:film articles
123:
119:
118:documentation
115:
111:
107:
103:
102:
94:
83:
81:
78:
74:
73:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
478:
475:Release date
448:
444:
384:WP:CONSENSUS
315:
288:
266:
236:project page
234:
224:
218:India portal
155:
99:
40:WikiProjects
445:experienced
415:Beefybufoon
362:Beefybufoon
93:Film portal
30:Start-class
498:Categories
122:guidelines
110:open tasks
443:Multiple
269:on the
482:Sitush
453:Sitush
388:Sitush
344:Sitush
322:Sitush
186:Cinema
64:Indian
36:scale.
242:India
231:India
181:India
486:talk
457:talk
419:talk
392:talk
366:talk
348:talk
326:talk
127:Film
112:and
59:Film
261:Low
500::
488:)
459:)
421:)
394:)
368:)
350:)
328:)
297:).
184::
62::
484:(
455:(
417:(
390:(
364:(
346:(
324:(
273:.
239:.
160:.
124:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
