963:
as the "other stuff". Someone should see about expanding the lead. I planned on looking at this but have to work today since nobody will donate a millon bucks so I can retire. Material in the lead should be a summary of what is in the body of the article. Referencing in the lead is not actually necessary "if" summary content is in the body. I haven't looked but if a revision was reinstated that does not follow the AFD consensus then there is a problem and reverting to "other revisions" instead of building on the one agreed upon by consensus can be considered disrumptive editing. I will have to look at this later as work calls.
1540:“In the intervening years, even while constrained by their terrorism designation, the group and its affiliates poured millions of dollars into a sophisticated effort to rehab their image, creating an influential lobbying effort on Capitol Hill. Via an opaque network of Iranian-American community organizations, supporters circumvented anti-terrorism laws to garner many fans in Washington, at least in some quarters, where they quietly pressed their case for hard-line policies against the Iranian regime through meetings with sympathetic members of Congress.”
191:
170:
1821:"In the same year, the organization paid nearly one-third of the costs for the trip of then-Mayor of San Diego Bob Filner to Paris, France, which totaled $ 31,363. Filner –who attended the annual meetings of the MEK in 2007 and 2011 sponsored by an Iranian-born Colorado real estate broker named Mehdi Ghaemi– appeared the event again in his trip. After the OIAC payment was placed under investigation for violation of state law by the City Council, Filner pledged to reimburse the costs."
824:
201:
436:
415:
1759:. I don't get your point on the distinction you said the source makes. The source says "opaque network of Iranian-American community organizations", and then adds that OIAC is an umbrella organization (of that Iranian-American community organizations) with chapters in 30 U.S. states. It also says it "examined giving by people listed by the pro-Mojahedin OIAC network" to write this article. Would you please explain how it is OR?
446:
81:
1010:. All of these are simply referred to as OIAC. I find primary evidence of 25 (I can't find 30 or 40) branch groups in 23 states of one parent organization in Washington DC that does have coverage. Individuals and communities that do not have a "state organization" can certainly go through the OIAC/OIAC-US. A problem is reliable sourcing other than primary and unreliable sourcing and mirror sites.
323:
302:
1281:
333:
50:
21:
1411:
their Hill outreach strategy that accomplishes nearly everything they’re able to do,” the former staffer explained. “Given how small they are and how marginal they actually are, the amount of influence they wield is actually kind of amazing.”... In the U.S. today, an umbrella organization of groups declaring allegiance to Maryam Rajavi — the innocuously named
1548:“Pro-Mojahedin activists were outraged. Their exact numbers can be hard to divine: the Mojahedin themselves often won’t declare their membership. In the U.S. today, an umbrella organization of groups declaring allegiance to Maryam Rajavi — the innocuously named Organization of Iranian-American Communities — claims its network covers over 30 states.”
946:
actually happened it would be a good thing but politically the MEK organization seems to be aligned with US and
Israeli interests. However, sources show that the "listing" was a political move so balance dictates if showing one side both should be presented. The MEK "front" relationship only deserves prominance if backed by multiple sourcing.
1065:
1164:, along with the primary government source showing non-profit status, and the secondary sourcing backing this up, means that as written the content is biased. The lead is a summary of what is in the body of the article and not the location for political statements with a sole reference goes against the
962:
with the "D" meaning discuss if reverted. Also, @ User:Jeff5102, please be open minded to editors that have an interest in an article and "if you revert" and it is re-reverted without discussion this can be resolved by arbitration. The "contentious" material should be presented in the article as well
785:
probably needs to take a step back and seek more consensus before trying to radically change the article again. He/she may be 100% correct, but this isn't the way to go about things. Knowledge (XXG) needs reliable sources for stuff, facts need to be presented in a neutral, dispassionate manner, and
1148:. Individuals do not get to pick-and-choose exactly what type of source (like NBC) qualifies as reliable unless they bought the article. Reliable, independent and, secondary are qualifications. We also should not pick and choose content from among sources that can look like a one-sided agenda called
1079:
The source concerning the OIAC’s 2013 Annual
Conference for Democracy and that Mayor Bob Filner traveled to the city of Lille, France, paid for by the OIAC’s and that "representations regarding its non-profit status were inaccurate." needs to be looked at. I found OIAC non-profit listing for OIAC so
957:
The bottom line is that involved editors need to try to work together. User:Pahlevun has contested notability and consensus has so far determined the subject notable. I will not fault multiple edits to try to improve the article as long as they follow that neutrality needs to be used. Since this has
1996:
I did not think the content was suitable for that title. I also was hoping to have a conversation with
Pahlevun and ask him why he thought someone reimbursing travel costs was notable content for a Knowledge (XXG) article, but he stopped responding, so I just removed it. I think that Pahlevun needs
1848:
says "The groups have also sought to build support for Rajavi’s claim that the NCRI is the legitimate government of Iran. The OIAC notably spent just shy of $ 100,000 over the past three years sending six House members and five staffers of both parties to the NCRI’s annual rally in Paris, according
1410:
of
Iranian-American community organizations, supporters circumvented anti-terrorism laws to garner many fans in Washington, at least in some quarters, where they quietly pressed their case for hard-line policies against the Iranian regime through meetings with sympathetic members of Congress. “It’s
941:
From what I can see, that certainly shows notability of an organization in at least 30 states, is that it has been substantiated that there are ties between the OIAC and the MEK, that I seem to remember was once referred to as the MKO, so this is not controversial by sourcing. If there is more than
1608:
is a summary in the source itself, which asserts that their investigations examined the OIAC network and what they wrote and concluded is based on that information. I stress again, that I have summarized the source (=shortened a long article to one sentence) in my own words which is fairly aligned
524:
I have restored an earlier version (content) per a majority of editors comments. This was mistakenly reverted stating in the edit summary: "AFD isn't closed yet". There is clear consensus that the contents of the artice be reverted (restored) to a previous version and doing so does not violate and
1085:
This needs to be an article presenting both sides according to reliable sources and not possibly
Knowledge (XXG) led false accusations. It does not need to be one or more editor's political agenda. This is apparently a problem with bias editing on Knowledge (XXG). I find primary evidence of 25 (I
945:
To me the situation with the MEK of being on and removed from the US terrorist watch list is political and the US has historically made poor judgements in this area. A once considered terrorist organization, blamed for US deaths, has now had a change of heart to become delisted. I suppose if that
1948:
You're overreaching here. A bad section title isn't a valid reason to remove content that is actually supported by the source; also, only a section of the "lobbying" section has been demonstrated to have original research issues. Please stick to removing that content which was demonstrated to be
1121:
source to verify it. I'm not having an issue to change the lead, if there is a reliable, independent and secondary source (like NBC) that states it is non-profit. The
Huffington Post link above is a blog post: "This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors
1735:
describes OIAC as an "opaque network", is very obviously not supported by the source. The source uses that to describe the network of the MEK's supporters, not the OIAC. This is a rather obvious example of what happens when you let your personal POV get in the way of reading a source carefully;
953:
not backed by secondary. It is acceptable to use a primary source on content concerning a subject so all the individual tags can be replace with a primary source template at the top or "multiple" if necessary to cover other issues. I don't consider the notability tag as needed however, I do not
765:
If I don't look at the article, but just at the process, it looks to me as if in this discussion, the minority of one or two editors is trying VERY hard to get their way, without caring about consensus. I would like to invite those editors to take a good look at the discussions concerning this
1190:" of non-profit this organization might be. (Yes, an organization paying lobby firms listed as a charity!) Maybe that's why the Intercept calls it part of an "opaque network". I would also suggest you to read about how the MEK ran another front organization in the UK under guise of charity in
1122:
control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email." The Media Line source reads: "Nate Nkumbu is a
Student Intern in The Media Line’s Press and Policy Student Program". Plus, none of them state that OIAC is non-profit.
1168:. As summary content the lead does not need to present new information. Since referenced content should be in the body of the article it would then not require re-sourcing. The lead in this article is in severe need of expanding but if we can't get it right then leave it out.
102:
1600:(...) in my quotation, which means I have intentionally left the text in between to refer to the relevant parts, not to "to make it seem like the source is talking about the OIAC". Yes, the source speaks about the MEK, and it says OIAC is actually part of the MEK (an
1780:
The source does not treat the OAIC as being synonymous with the entirety of the MEK's support network. I said this already, so I don't know why you are asking me to repeat it. If this is a distinction you cannot see, you ought not to be editing this page.
1415:— claims its network covers over 30 states. In the intervening years, even while constrained by their terrorism designation, the group and its affiliates poured millions of dollars into a sophisticated effort to rehab their image, creating an influential
1911:
you added a section in the article "Sponsorship of MEK/NCRI rallies", but from I can see, the content in that section talks about the OIAC paying some congress people to attend a NCRI rally. Please explain how the content is suitable for that section.
1849:
to the for-profit congressional data aggregator
Legistorm, and helped put together a special section of the conservative Washington Times newspaper in conjunction with this year’s rally" and I thought paying for Filner's trip is a similar case. Maybe
1140:@ Pahlevun: To even "attempt" to try to argue that a branch of the US federal government (IRS), that is the sole deciding entity on any non-profit status, needs secondary sourcing or be discounted is absurd. However, since you brought this up, an
1162:"NBC 7 reached out to the OIAC for comment on Wednesday. OIAC vice president Ross Amin said his group is a non-profit, but said he’s unsure what kind, and does not know why the organization doesn’t appear in a federal database of such agencies."
603:. Then Knowledge (XXG) will have a better article than that is here now. Two points: first, we must try to rescue the sources whose links are dead. Second, we can insert/reinsert/keep the more recent news around this organization. Best regards,
1736:
you've blurred the distinction between the OIAC and the MEK's other supporters, which, for better or for worse, is a distinction the source makes. Consider this a warning, please. Further examples of original research may be met with a TBAN.
874:
on this that I'm at the point of giving up working on NPOV issues altogether. I also don't have an inclination against or opposed to the subject, just trying to solve some of the more obvious neutrality issues. Pahlevun has a long history of
31:
1636:
Top officials close to the Donald Trump administration — including national security adviser John Bolton and
Rudolph Giuliani, the president’s personal lawyer — have taken tens of thousands of dollars in fees from the MEK and its
1882:"paying for Filner's trip is a similar case"? What you added to the article suggested that Filner had done lobbying for the IOAC, something that is not supported by the sources. Isn't that what they call "original research"?
913:
it seems that local consensus is not in agreement with your views on the content and sourcing of this article, both here on the talk page and at the recent AfD. Please do not edit in a way which would constitute
1965:
Vanamonde: I did not think that Filner reimbursing trip costs to a rally was notable information, this is why I removed it. If you think this is important information I will put it back in the article.
852:
This is a contentious subject and should be treated as such. The AFD consensus was that the article was not neutral and at least "some" of these multiple "spurt edits" do not appear to be neutral.
2105:
808:'s edits. I also think there can be "some" justification to ""some" edits but these multiple smaller edits make it hard to follow and are contested. This editor is familiar with edits by
231:
1558:
saying “about removal of content that said OIAC is a front for the MEK/NCRI, several reliable sources are available”, but none of those sources say the OIAC is a front for the MEK/NCRI.
1552:
In his answer in this talk page I think
Pahlevun merged these paragraphs together to make it seem like the source is talking about the OIAC, while it's really talking about the MEK.
1980:
I don't care one way or another, but you were claiming your removal was based on a discussion, which isn't true. The discussion was only relevant to one part of what you removed.
1449:
compiled a cross-section of political giving by supporters of the organization in the U.S. between 2009 — when the campaign to de-list the Mojahedin ramped up — and the present.
248:
1186:
source you gave for the regional office in Sacramento being tax exempt, does not show any other record of the OIAC being non-profit, that's why OIAC's vice president is says "
1845:
1144:, presumably a reliable source since not argued with and content is used in the article ("located right next door to the NCRI office..."), and "right next door" to this:
284:
152:
1441:
The outspoken advocacy for the group coincided with the rise of campaign contributions from Mojahedin supporters to Menendez, according to an analysis conducted by
781:
I don't really care about the article (or the organization) that much. I was just alerted because the bot kept yelling at me because I uploaded the logo. I think
735:
18 April: after some not-that-friendly editing on the article, the AfD closes with 6 keep-votes, and only the nominator voting for deletion. Now the AFD is closed,
2100:
274:
1311:
text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of
238:
2085:
1656:
142:
1057:
551:
If we agree that a consensus is reached on this (which I believe not), can really users make a consensus on reverting the article to a version that violates
502:
2110:
2090:
1052:
1028:
1297:
243:
118:
2135:
492:
1023:
1826:
837:
there is a listing and this would contradict the lead as well as the source. This "might have been overlooked but articles should be edited from a
397:
2095:
766:
article, and see if they are on the right path in editing it conform the majority view. Please, let's all try to be reasonable here. Best regards,
1489:
2140:
2080:
673:
655:
1346:
from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. —
468:
214:
175:
109:
86:
2120:
786:
if reliable sources conflict, the conflict should be presented in a neutral, factual way, with due weight given to the disagreeing sources.
387:
1620:" for Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK), an Iranian opposition group that was designated in the past as a terrorist organization by the United States.
355:
701:
starts an AfD with an appeal to the notability guideline for organizations criteria. Then this user removes the See also-section for being
585:
1485:
1649:
Since the sources specifically refer to Rudy Giuliani, the official website of OIAC shows how many speeches has he made for the group:
739:(me, that is) restores the article to the December 2016-version, as was discussed both at the AfD-debate as on the article's talk-page.
2130:
2125:
1630:, The National Council of Resistance of Iran, involved a scream fest not unlike his performance at the Republican National Convention.
1457:, as well as supporters and activists identified by other news articles, and a former Congressional staffer who has tracked the group.
226:
838:
359:
1676:
1534:
459:
420:
1493:
222:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
1481:
821:"It "inaccurately represent itself as a non-profit" and doesn’t appear in a federal database of such agencies according to NBC."
1665:
1229:
1191:
1109:
Note that the NBC source stating the organization is not non-profit dates back to 2013, and five years has passed since then.
61:
2115:
924:
1927:
Pahlevun stopped responding. I will remove that content as it doesn't look like it fits "Sponsorship of MEK/NCRI rallies".
1533:” part is from a different paragraph in the article that talks about the MEK, not the OIAC). This is what is in the article
1484:
wrote about Rudy Giuliani's speech at Iran Freedom Convention for Human Rights and Democracy, May 5, 2018, in Washington.
363:
1480:
By the way, about removal of content that said OIAC is a front for the MEK/NCRI, several reliable sources are available.
1256:"NonProfitFacts.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk."
346:
307:
716:
had proposed to revert the article to an earlier (more neutral) version of 26 December 2016. This idea was supported by
1343:
27:
1202:
to opposing views. The organization's PR and press releases were given too much weight, and turned this article to a
1064:
Assertions of being a front is very possible. The organization accused of helping to fund MEK was identified as the
1949:
problematic, retitle the rest of it, and initiate discussion here about the material that you still disagree with.
1604:
for the "opaque network of Iranian-American community organizations" which claims 30 state affiliates per source).
1380:“The Intercept describes OIAC as an "opaque network" which is used by the MEK to lobby the United States Congress”.
1522:"The Intercept describes OIAC as an "opaque network" which is used by the MEK to lobby the United States Congress”
1334:
for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright violations
1284:
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from:
1152:. Using 2013 sourcing and then wording that "appears" to be present language instead of year related past-tense:
1828:
1038:
These sites contain content to the subject but are not vetted, are press releases, and even posted as submitted.
2065:
2046:
2006:
1991:
1975:
1960:
1936:
1921:
1891:
1866:
1839:
1792:
1768:
1747:
1716:
1591:
1567:
1505:
1472:
1432:
1391:
1358:
1269:
1245:
1215:
1183:
1177:
1131:
1095:
972:
929:
899:
861:
800:
I have no agenda with the article at all but it seems there is bias and attempts at one-sided presentations in
795:
791:
775:
635:
612:
593:
589:
564:
538:
1323:
properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original
67:
1327:
1308:
1304:
746:
reverts this to the version of the article that stood there just before the closing of the AfD (because of
577:
1626:
Or perhaps, in Giuliani, avarice and ideology melt into one another. His last appearance before the MeK’s
702:
1293:
1149:
787:
721:
677:
659:
526:
2038:
1986:
1955:
1787:
1742:
1609:
with the spirit and meaning of the source. About the front organization, Haaretz which is referring to "
1601:
1586:
985:
895:
467:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
117:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2031:. You said the reason was that the content was mistitled, but Vanamonde explained you could retitle it.
623:
1086:
can't find 30 or 40) branch groups in 23 states of one parent organization that does have coverage.
206:
1232:
shows "Support Schedule for Organizations Described in Section 509(a)(2) (for 2009 - 2013)" for the
1203:
950:
842:
49:
20:
1158:“I have become aware that OIAC’s representations regarding its non-profit status were inaccurate,”
2061:
2002:
1971:
1932:
1917:
1887:
1862:
1835:
1764:
1712:
1563:
1501:
1468:
1428:
1387:
1330:
from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our
1288:. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored,
1265:
1211:
1127:
922:
809:
771:
608:
560:
1526:, but I did not find the source supported this, so I asked him about it. However, in his answer
1199:
882:
190:
169:
1685:
1673:
1354:
1157:
1662:
1398:
816:
2033:
1982:
1951:
1783:
1756:
1738:
1704:
1582:
1529:, Pahevun re-organized the text differently from the way it’s organized in the article (the
1515:
1241:
1173:
1146:"Separately, the NCRI-linked nonprofit Organization of Iranian American Communities (OIAC),"
1091:
968:
891:
857:
717:
713:
631:
534:
1331:
1165:
959:
915:
846:
581:
1698:
988:
usually referred to as OIAC-US (OIACUS) and includes various organizational names such as
451:
2053:
1641:
over the years to speak before rallies that promote Maryam Rajavi’s leadership ambitions.
1320:
1195:
552:
622:: Need to look at trimming sources also. The "Mission and acivities" section has severe
918:. You may of course continue to discuss the issue here, or present additional sources.
729:
1703:), I have not yet added any of these to the article as it is clear. I am also pinging
1141:
445:
435:
414:
2074:
2057:
2020:
1998:
1967:
1943:
1928:
1913:
1906:
1883:
1873:
1858:
1831:
1809:
1775:
1760:
1731:
1722:
1708:
1575:
1559:
1497:
1464:
1424:
1383:
1370:
1261:
1207:
1123:
919:
910:
871:
803:
782:
767:
760:
If you want it changed, add content with a reliable sources instead of those garbage.
755:
751:
743:
736:
706:
698:
691:
687:
666:
651:
604:
571:
556:
219:
114:
1319:, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and
1347:
1002:
Association of Iranian Americans in New York (AIAINY) that also covers New Jersey,
867:
1292:
it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see
1033:
1280:
1237:
1169:
1104:
1087:
964:
853:
725:
627:
546:
530:
350:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to
338:
101:
80:
1610:
441:
328:
196:
1397:
I have summarized a long text in one sentence, and this a usual practice per
754:
reverts this version to a "more neutral version", which is reverted again by
1156:
and using "represent" and not "represented" is implying what is not there.
218:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
322:
301:
1653:
1597:
1445:. Assisted in part by the work of independent researcher Joanne Stocker,
1316:
464:
1616:
The group that hosted Giuliani has been accused by critics of being a "
1113:
OIAC was registered legally as a non-profit after that, but we need an
705:, and removes 70% of the content. The See also-section was restored by
1997:
to explain why this is important information before it can be added.
1435:
This part also is a description of the investigation in that source:
1160:, is one side of the coin but the other side is in the same article:
866:
I've had a similar experience trying to bring some neutrality to the
750:), and add some rather non-neutral texts and a notability-tag. After
1154:"...the organization "inaccurately represent itself as a non-profit"
1611:
Iran Freedom Convention for Human Rights and Democracy, May 5, 2018
1401:. A quotation of the parts in question in the source is as below:
351:
1453:’s study examined giving by people listed by the pro-Mojahedin
43:
15:
942:
one source referencing being "a front" then that can be used.
354:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please
1659:
1650:
1285:
1830:) does it say that Filner did any lobbying for the OIAC?
1296:
if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or
1496:
states NCRI and OIAC share an address in Washington DC.
831:"Organization of Iranian American Communities Oiac Inc."
2028:
2024:
1854:
1815:
1726:
1605:
1556:
1527:
1524:
1376:
954:
oppose the tag until such acceptable sources are found.
888:
886:
884:
880:
876:
1670:
The Terrorist Argument: Modern Advocacy and Propaganda
1234:
Organization Of Iranian American Communities Oiac Inc.
1071:
833:
in West Sacremento. This means that, according to a
463:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
113:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1182:What would be your proposed neutral lead then? The
845:. Since this criteria is one of Knowledge (XXG)'s
1067:"Iranian-American Community of Northern Virginia"
724:. On 15 April 2018 this proposal was executed by
2106:C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
690:requests a speedy delition; this is declined by
1634:
1624:
1614:
1439:
1404:
1254:
1814:you created the section "Lobbying activities"
1825:Can you please explain where in the sources (
1672:, Brookings Institution Press, 2018, p. 300,
1667:. Moreover, there is another source for it (
1070:(pp, 73). This is not the listed and current
8:
1857:the content to a new section. Is it OK now?
1413:Organization of Iranian-American Communities
1016:Site that are unreliable as user submitted.
998:Minnesota Iranian American Advocacy Council
841:and a disinterested viewpoint according to
409:
296:
164:
75:
1580:please answer BarcrMac's latest comment.
1544:Then, in a different paragraph, it says:
958:shwon to be contentious it should follow
582:there will always be room for improvement
259:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
127:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Organizations
1846:Al-Monitor piece which is about lobbying
994:California Society for Democracy in Iran
2056:by Pahlevun in several of those edits.
1004:Iranian American Communities of Alabama
411:
298:
166:
77:
47:
1820:
1694:
1683:
1555:Also, Pahlevun then provides 3 sources
1547:
1539:
1530:
1521:
1379:
1045:Other sources (did not check out yet)
870:. It's been so difficult to work with
712:15 April 2018: during the AfD-debate,
674:National Council of Resistance of Iran
656:National Council of Resistance of Iran
2101:Low-importance United States articles
1382:Where does it say that in the source?
1294:"using copyrighted works from others"
990:Colorado Society of Iranian Americans
7:
2086:Low-importance organization articles
1817:, and then added this that section:
949:I do have a problem with the use of
525:policies and guidelines but per Per
477:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics
457:This article is within the scope of
344:This article is within the scope of
212:This article is within the scope of
107:This article is within the scope of
1520:Pahlevun added to the article that
1260:I don't think that it is reliable.
66:It is of interest to the following
2111:WikiProject United States articles
2091:WikiProject Organizations articles
1853:was not a good word to choose, so
1596:As you can see above, I have used
1166:five principles of Knowledge (XXG)
262:Template:WikiProject United States
130:Template:WikiProject Organizations
14:
732:, since the AFD isn't closed yet.
2136:Low-importance politics articles
2023:can you explain why you removed
1298:"donating copyrighted materials"
1279:
849:it should not be viewed lightly.
683:reverted this on 27 March 2018.
662:reverted this on 13 March 2018.
444:
434:
413:
372:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Iran
358:where you can contribute to the
331:
321:
300:
199:
189:
168:
100:
79:
48:
30:on 30 March 2018. The result of
19:
1900:Sponsorship of MEK/NCRI rallies
879:) edit-warring for POV pushing:
529:is within editorial consensus.
497:This article has been rated as
392:This article has been rated as
279:This article has been rated as
147:This article has been rated as
26:This article was nominated for
2096:C-Class United States articles
642:Attempt to prevent an edit war
1:
2141:WikiProject Politics articles
2081:C-Class organization articles
1707:, in case he was interested.
826:one simple check with the IRS
480:Template:WikiProject Politics
471:and see a list of open tasks.
121:and see a list of open tasks.
2121:Low-importance Iran articles
1729:, specifically, the phrase "
1531:“In the intervening years,…"
1359:22:36, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
646:The situation is like this:
1338:, and persistent violators
2157:
1332:guideline on non-free text
1216:14:40, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
1198:. I think we should evade
1178:05:52, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
1132:18:21, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
1096:08:03, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
973:08:41, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
930:15:46, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
900:09:28, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
862:07:20, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
796:01:10, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
776:21:06, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
636:03:00, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
613:07:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
594:00:19, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
565:19:47, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
539:17:15, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
503:project's importance scale
398:project's importance scale
285:project's importance scale
153:project's importance scale
2131:C-Class politics articles
2126:WikiProject Iran articles
2066:09:59, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
2047:02:01, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
2007:12:18, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
1992:14:55, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
1976:13:23, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
1275:Copyright problem removed
1076:organization of the OIAC.
694:almost three hours later.
496:
429:
391:
375:Template:WikiProject Iran
316:
278:
215:WikiProject United States
184:
146:
110:WikiProject Organizations
95:
74:
1961:16:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
1937:12:54, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
1922:15:19, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
1892:12:52, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
1867:00:00, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
1840:12:14, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
1793:17:03, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
1769:23:35, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
1748:22:12, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
1725:, the content you added
1717:20:04, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
1606:This quote which I added
1592:17:47, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
1315:, and, if allowed under
1270:19:55, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
1246:09:29, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
1080:not sure how this ended.
847:"fundamental principles"
220:United States of America
1633:as well as Al-Monitor:
1623:This is from Politico:
1568:09:27, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
1506:22:36, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
1473:21:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
1433:21:45, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
1392:14:13, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
1286:https://oiac.org/about/
1200:giving "equal validity"
672:redirected the page to
654:redirected the page to
1643:
1632:
1622:
1459:
1421:
1258:
1206:for the organization.
812:so should follow this.
728:, and later undone by
265:United States articles
56:This article is rated
2116:C-Class Iran articles
1602:umbrella organization
1188:he’s unsure what kind
986:Umbrella organization
839:neutral point of view
810:"talk page consensus"
580:applies, and clearly
133:organization articles
60:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1006:, and several other
758:, who adds the text
460:WikiProject Politics
207:United States portal
1639:front organizations
1307:, we cannot accept
979:Article information
829:shows a listing of
722:User:Faceless Enemy
678:User:Faceless Enemy
660:User:Faceless Enemy
233:Articles Requested!
1693:Unknown parameter
1628:front organization
1618:front organization
1492:mention that too.
1364:Intercept and OIAC
835:"federal database"
362:and help with our
62:content assessment
1251:The website says:
1224:Tax exempt status
1142:article reference
926:DESiegel Contribs
624:Citation overkill
517:
516:
513:
512:
509:
508:
483:politics articles
408:
407:
404:
403:
295:
294:
291:
290:
163:
162:
159:
158:
42:
41:
2148:
2042:
1990:
1959:
1947:
1910:
1877:
1813:
1791:
1779:
1746:
1702:
1696:
1691:
1689:
1681:
1590:
1579:
1519:
1419:on Capitol Hill.
1374:
1352:
1283:
1108:
807:
718:User:London Hall
714:User:E.M.Gregory
709:at the same day.
697:30 March 2018:
686:30 March 2018:
665:14 March 2018:
575:
550:
520:Restored version
485:
484:
481:
478:
475:
454:
449:
448:
438:
431:
430:
425:
417:
410:
380:
379:
376:
373:
370:
356:join the project
347:WikiProject Iran
341:
336:
335:
334:
325:
318:
317:
312:
304:
297:
267:
266:
263:
260:
257:
209:
204:
203:
202:
193:
186:
185:
180:
172:
165:
135:
134:
131:
128:
125:
104:
97:
96:
91:
83:
76:
59:
53:
52:
44:
23:
16:
2156:
2155:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2147:
2146:
2145:
2071:
2070:
2045:
2040:
1981:
1950:
1941:
1904:
1902:
1871:
1807:
1805:
1803:Filner and OIAC
1782:
1773:
1737:
1692:
1682:
1679:
1668:
1581:
1573:
1513:
1417:lobbying effort
1368:
1366:
1350:
1277:
1226:
1102:
1058:Huffington Post
984:The OIAC is an
981:
951:primary sources
938:
927:
877:not so friendly
801:
748:garbage sources
742:20 April 2018:
650:8 March 2018:
644:
576:Yes, they can,
569:
544:
522:
482:
479:
476:
473:
472:
452:Politics portal
450:
443:
423:
377:
374:
371:
368:
367:
337:
332:
330:
310:
264:
261:
258:
255:
254:
253:
239:Become a Member
205:
200:
198:
178:
132:
129:
126:
123:
122:
89:
57:
12:
11:
5:
2154:
2152:
2144:
2143:
2138:
2133:
2128:
2123:
2118:
2113:
2108:
2103:
2098:
2093:
2088:
2083:
2073:
2072:
2069:
2068:
2037:
2018:
2017:
2016:
2015:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2009:
1901:
1898:
1897:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1804:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1751:
1750:
1677:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1461:
1460:
1408:opaque network
1403:
1402:
1365:
1362:
1336:very seriously
1276:
1273:
1253:
1252:
1230:NonProfitFacts
1225:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1082:
1081:
1077:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1055:
1053:The Media Line
1047:
1046:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1036:
1031:
1026:
1018:
1017:
1013:
1012:
980:
977:
976:
975:
955:
947:
943:
937:
934:
933:
932:
925:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
850:
813:
788:Faceless Enemy
763:
762:
740:
733:
730:User:WilliamJE
710:
695:
684:
663:
643:
640:
639:
638:
616:
615:
598:
597:
596:
586:198.84.253.202
521:
518:
515:
514:
511:
510:
507:
506:
499:Low-importance
495:
489:
488:
486:
469:the discussion
456:
455:
439:
427:
426:
424:Low‑importance
418:
406:
405:
402:
401:
394:Low-importance
390:
384:
383:
381:
343:
342:
326:
314:
313:
311:Low‑importance
305:
293:
292:
289:
288:
281:Low-importance
277:
271:
270:
268:
252:
251:
246:
241:
236:
229:
227:Template Usage
223:
211:
210:
194:
182:
181:
179:Low‑importance
173:
161:
160:
157:
156:
149:Low-importance
145:
139:
138:
136:
119:the discussion
105:
93:
92:
90:Low‑importance
84:
72:
71:
65:
54:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2153:
2142:
2139:
2137:
2134:
2132:
2129:
2127:
2124:
2122:
2119:
2117:
2114:
2112:
2109:
2107:
2104:
2102:
2099:
2097:
2094:
2092:
2089:
2087:
2084:
2082:
2079:
2078:
2076:
2067:
2063:
2059:
2055:
2051:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2044:
2043:
2036:
2035:
2030:
2026:
2022:
2008:
2004:
2000:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1988:
1984:
1979:
1978:
1977:
1973:
1969:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1957:
1953:
1945:
1940:
1939:
1938:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1908:
1899:
1893:
1889:
1885:
1881:
1875:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1864:
1860:
1856:
1852:
1847:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1837:
1833:
1829:
1827:
1823:
1822:
1818:
1816:
1811:
1802:
1794:
1789:
1785:
1777:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1766:
1762:
1758:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1749:
1744:
1740:
1734:
1733:
1732:The Intercept
1728:
1724:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1714:
1710:
1706:
1700:
1687:
1680:
1678:9780815732198
1675:
1671:
1666:
1663:
1660:
1657:
1654:
1651:
1642:
1640:
1631:
1629:
1621:
1619:
1612:
1607:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1588:
1584:
1577:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1550:
1549:
1545:
1542:
1541:
1537:
1535:
1532:
1528:
1525:
1523:
1517:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1458:
1456:
1452:
1451:The Intercept
1448:
1447:The Intercept
1444:
1443:The Intercept
1438:
1437:
1436:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1420:
1418:
1414:
1409:
1400:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1381:
1377:
1375:In your edit
1372:
1363:
1361:
1360:
1356:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1305:legal reasons
1301:
1300:if you are.)
1299:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1282:
1274:
1272:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1257:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1223:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1106:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1084:
1083:
1078:
1075:
1074:
1069:
1068:
1063:
1059:
1056:
1054:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1044:
1043:
1037:
1035:
1034:Common Dreams
1032:
1030:
1029:EIN Presswire
1027:
1025:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1015:
1014:
1011:
1008:IAC "of ____"
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
987:
983:
982:
978:
974:
970:
966:
961:
956:
952:
948:
944:
940:
939:
935:
931:
928:
923:
921:
917:
912:
909:
908:
901:
897:
893:
889:
887:
885:
883:
881:
878:
873:
869:
865:
864:
863:
859:
855:
851:
848:
844:
840:
836:
832:
828:
827:
822:
818:
814:
811:
805:
799:
798:
797:
793:
789:
784:
780:
779:
778:
777:
773:
769:
761:
757:
756:User:Pahlevun
753:
752:User:Jeff5102
749:
745:
744:User:Pahlevun
741:
738:
737:User:Jeff5102
734:
731:
727:
723:
719:
715:
711:
708:
707:User:DESiegel
704:
700:
699:User:Pahlevun
696:
693:
692:User:DESiegel
689:
688:User:Pahlevun
685:
682:
679:
675:
671:
668:
667:User:Pahlevun
664:
661:
657:
653:
652:User:Pahlevun
649:
648:
647:
641:
637:
633:
629:
625:
621:
618:
617:
614:
610:
606:
602:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
578:WP:NODEADLINE
573:
568:
567:
566:
562:
558:
554:
548:
543:
542:
541:
540:
536:
532:
528:
519:
504:
500:
494:
491:
490:
487:
470:
466:
462:
461:
453:
447:
442:
440:
437:
433:
432:
428:
422:
419:
416:
412:
399:
395:
389:
386:
385:
382:
378:Iran articles
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
348:
340:
329:
327:
324:
320:
319:
315:
309:
306:
303:
299:
286:
282:
276:
273:
272:
269:
256:United States
250:
247:
245:
242:
240:
237:
235:
234:
230:
228:
225:
224:
221:
217:
216:
208:
197:
195:
192:
188:
187:
183:
177:
176:United States
174:
171:
167:
154:
150:
144:
141:
140:
137:
124:Organizations
120:
116:
115:Organizations
112:
111:
106:
103:
99:
98:
94:
88:
87:Organizations
85:
82:
78:
73:
69:
63:
55:
51:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
2039:
2032:
2019:
1903:
1879:
1850:
1824:
1819:
1806:
1730:
1669:
1648:
1638:
1635:
1627:
1625:
1617:
1615:
1554:
1551:
1546:
1543:
1538:
1512:
1462:
1455:OIAC network
1454:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1440:
1422:
1416:
1412:
1407:
1405:
1367:
1339:
1335:
1324:
1312:
1302:
1289:
1278:
1259:
1255:
1233:
1227:
1196:The Guardian
1187:
1161:
1153:
1145:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1072:
1066:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
989:
916:edit warring
834:
830:
825:
820:
819:now states:
764:
759:
747:
680:
669:
645:
619:
600:
527:WP:EDITATAFD
523:
498:
458:
393:
345:
280:
244:Project Talk
232:
213:
148:
108:
68:WikiProjects
35:
1757:Vanamonde93
1516:Vanamonde93
1313:information
1309:copyrighted
1228:The source
1115:independent
892:London Hall
868:MEK article
726:User:Otr500
360:discussions
339:Iran portal
2075:Categories
2052:There was
1851:engagement
1613:" writes:
1490:Al-Monitor
1406:...Via an
1378:you added
1328:plagiarize
1321:referenced
843:WP:BALANCE
364:open tasks
1983:Vanamonde
1952:Vanamonde
1784:Vanamonde
1739:Vanamonde
1705:Vanamonde
1697:ignored (
1695:|authors=
1583:Vanamonde
1150:synthesis
1119:secondary
2021:BarcrMac
1944:BarcrMac
1907:Pahlevun
1874:Pahlevun
1859:Pahlevun
1810:Pahlevun
1776:Pahlevun
1761:Pahlevun
1723:Pahlevun
1709:Pahlevun
1686:citation
1598:ellipsis
1576:Pahlevun
1498:Pahlevun
1494:This one
1486:Politico
1465:Pahlevun
1425:Pahlevun
1371:Pahlevun
1317:fair use
1262:Pahlevun
1208:Pahlevun
1192:IB Times
1124:Pahlevun
1073:"IAC-VA"
1024:Merinews
936:Comments
911:Pahlevun
872:Pahlevun
804:Pahlevun
783:Pahlevun
768:Jeff5102
605:Jeff5102
572:Pahlevun
557:Pahlevun
474:Politics
465:politics
421:Politics
28:deletion
1880:thought
1855:I moved
1482:Haaretz
1399:WP:CLOP
1348:Diannaa
1344:blocked
1204:soapbox
703:WP:Coat
501:on the
396:on the
283:on the
151:on the
58:C-class
1290:unless
1238:Otr500
1170:Otr500
1105:Otr500
1088:Otr500
965:Otr500
960:WP:BRD
854:Otr500
823:, but
628:Otr500
547:Otr500
531:Otr500
249:Alerts
64:scale.
2058:Barca
2054:WP:OR
1999:Barca
1968:Barca
1929:Barca
1914:Barca
1884:Barca
1832:Barca
1560:Barca
1384:Barca
1111:Maybe
681:again
670:again
601:Agree
553:WP:RS
2062:talk
2041:talk
2029:this
2027:and
2025:this
2003:talk
1987:Talk
1972:talk
1956:Talk
1933:talk
1918:talk
1888:talk
1878:you
1863:talk
1836:talk
1788:Talk
1765:talk
1743:Talk
1727:here
1713:talk
1699:help
1674:ISBN
1587:Talk
1564:talk
1502:talk
1488:and
1469:talk
1429:talk
1388:talk
1355:talk
1340:will
1303:For
1266:talk
1242:talk
1212:talk
1194:and
1174:talk
1128:talk
1117:and
1092:talk
969:talk
896:talk
858:talk
817:lead
815:The
792:talk
772:talk
720:and
632:talk
620:Note
609:talk
590:talk
561:talk
535:talk
369:Iran
352:Iran
308:Iran
36:keep
34:was
1536::
1342:be
1184:IRS
920:DES
493:Low
388:Low
275:Low
143:Low
2077::
2064:)
2034:VR
2005:)
1974:)
1935:)
1920:)
1890:)
1865:)
1838:)
1767:)
1715:)
1690::
1688:}}
1684:{{
1664:,
1661:,
1658:,
1655:,
1652:,
1566:)
1504:)
1471:)
1431:)
1390:)
1357:)
1351:🍁
1325:or
1268:)
1244:)
1236:.
1214:)
1176:)
1130:)
1094:)
1000:,
996:,
992:,
971:)
898:)
890:.
860:)
794:)
774:)
676:;
658:;
634:)
626:.
611:)
592:)
584:.
563:)
555:?
537:)
2060:(
2001:(
1989:)
1985:(
1970:(
1958:)
1954:(
1946::
1942:@
1931:(
1916:(
1909::
1905:@
1886:(
1876::
1872:@
1861:(
1834:(
1812::
1808:@
1790:)
1786:(
1778::
1774:@
1763:(
1745:)
1741:(
1711:(
1701:)
1589:)
1585:(
1578::
1574:@
1562:(
1518::
1514:@
1500:(
1467:(
1463:—
1427:(
1423:—
1386:(
1373::
1369:@
1353:(
1264:(
1240:(
1210:(
1172:(
1126:(
1107::
1103:@
1090:(
967:(
894:(
875:(
856:(
806::
802:@
790:(
770:(
630:(
607:(
588:(
574::
570:@
559:(
549::
545:@
533:(
505:.
400:.
366:.
287:.
155:.
70::
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
