Talk:Otto Hahn - Knowledge

1415:

contemplated suicide, and instead indicates that it was the physicist Walther Gerlach who was quite upset by the news of Hiroshima, so much that when his fellow internees Max von Laue and Paul Harteck tried to comfort him Gerlach threatened to shoot himself. According to Major Ritter, Gerlach “consider himself in the position of a defeated general, the only alternative to whom is to shoot himself.”440 However, Gerlach had no gun and was ultimately calmed by Laue and Harteck, and later by Hahn as well. There is no evidence at all that any of the other internees, including Hahn, reacted so strongly to Hiroshima. J. Michael Cole, the translator of Hoffmann’s biography agrees that Hoffmann probably had a poor version of the Farm Hall transcript (the transcripts were not officially released or published until 1993, by which time Hoffmann’s biography was in press) and as a result confused Hahn and Gerlach. As Cole wrote: “This direct record …counters the contention that Hahn was of any suicidal mind, let alone sufficient to cause his colleagues serious concern, and reveals that it was Gerlach who was badly affected with such a mood, here incorrectly imprecated upon Hahn.”

1073:

some cases, on behalf of the Nazi regime. I believe the betrayal of Meitner and Hahn's complicity in removing her from the KWI deserves a mention here."...I don't really think the article is overly laudatory - Hahn was surely one of the greatest chemists of the 20th century (maybe in the top three? Or ten?). I also think the fact that he worked under the Nazi regime is obvious, and not overly noteworthy unless someone knows of some particularly heinous project(s) he completed directly promoting Nazi crimes (as opposed to wartime contributions going on all over the world by scientists, medical doctors, etc)...Hahn was never known as a fan of the Nazis, compared, say, to Phillip Lenard who actively wanted Meitner removed. Per Ruth Lewin Sime's exhaustively researched book, Meitner and the Hahn family remained friends up to their deaths...

2389:

did not discover nuclear fission because he misinterpreted his findings, just like Irene Joliot-Curie and Pavle Savic misinterpreted their findings earlier in 1938 conducting similar experiments, which Meitner also corrected and reinterpreted (a fact Irene Curie later acknowledged prior to her death), and from which Hahn and Strassmann could even conduct their experiment to begin with. Irene and Frederic Joliot-Curie only conducted their experiments in Paris due to Enrico Fermi's team in Rome conducting research based on Leo Szilard and Thomas Chalmers in 1934, that discovered the Szilard-Chalmers effect of isotopic separation, which itself was based on Fermi's experiment from earlier in 1934, and again itself relied upon publications by the Joliot-Curie's earlier in 1933. All these publications were predominantly published in

511: 353: 234: 2400:. Frisch confirms nuclear fission is replicable and Bohr corrected the record that it is indeed Frisch who first confirmed nuclear fission come late-February 1939, but unfortunately after he, Fermi, Szilard, Dunning, Anderson and other physicists in the USA had begun to conduct their own research from Meitner and Frisch's correct reinterpretation. This is because Frisch had not responded to Bohr's telegrams until 20-22 January about were his experiments were at in Copenhagen. 1499:

until Chadwick's discovery of the neutron in 1932. Even isotopes were not discovered until 1913; before that Hahn was credited with discovering new elements. I stuck with linking each element on first appearance. In some cases isotopes have their own articles, some have a section in the isotopes article, and some are merely part of a table of isotopes. Hahn nearly blew the symbolic notation out of the water when he discovered nuclear isomerism. We could say

406: 385: 619: 598: 937:

Chemistry) or that we downplayed Meitner's role. I think that definitly the Germans/Jews and Man/Woman question is strongly superposed over the controversy and difficult to separate from the actual question. By the way, I somehow think the remember that after war Hahn and Meitner hat still good relations with each other. Does somebody know about that? I list three articles I found by searching a scientific database for "meitner l*":

501: 474: 629: 21: 93: 225: 291: 267: 819: 1058:

was an Experimental physicist, as opposed to Theoretical, and without adequate lab support her work (and her 'visiblity') slowed considerably for 10 years. Point is, this gives a sense of her being in a support role to observers watching from a distance (I do not mean to take away from her brilliant insights or her life's work...). The Sweden era threw Meitner's career off track compared to Hahn.

728: 707: 208: 738: 1053:

for discussing Hahn's Nobel prize as having a "controversy" other than a brief mention and maybe linking to to Meitner's Wiki bio. Rather it seems to be as much a product of a flaw in the awarding system as anything to do with Hahn. He didn't award the prize to himself! 3) Meitner's contributions do not downgrade Hahn's own work. We keep looking at it as an "either-or" contest.

147: 2096: 1341:

Hahn and Strassmann were the experimental half of the team, and Meitner and Frisch were the theoretical half. The current wording in the article makes it sound like Meitner (but not Frisch) was one of the experimentalists. I believe that when the experiments were performed at the lab in Berlin, Meitner was already a refugee in Sweden because of her race.

970:, a former Jew and a woman, in their collaboration such that she was excluded in the credit and the Nobel Prize. Some historians have asserted that her contributions were equal if not greater, and in a controversial survey of Nobel Prize winners conducted forty years later Lise Meitner was voted the most deserving of those who had not received the award. 1063:"controversial" about the survey? Who thought it was controversial? Perhaps a more exact, detailed identification of the survey would be in order, together with some discussion of who considered it controversial and why. Richwales 19:39, 18 November 2005 (UTC)"...I agree w/ Richwales - any statement like that about Meitner is better discussed under 1845: 1640: 1719: 1210:. Angelo says that "radiothorium" is Th-228 and "radioactinium" is Th-227, and that the original names were given by Hahn when working as a postdoc for Rutherford in 1904-1906. This was before atomic numbers were assigned or isotopes were understood, so it is not surprising that the inital identifications were very confused. 301: 1436:, pp. 133-137. The quote from Cole comes from the translator's notes in the 2001 edition of Hoffmann's book; I don't have that book (and the library has lost its copy), and the article writer had the earlier 1993 edition, and Badash writing in 1983 so must have had a still earlier copy. So I removed the quite under 2388:

what had occurred - not Hahn or Strassmann. Frisch is unaware of Bohr letting the cat out of the bag, considering he had asked him not to prior to leaving for the USA in January 1939, and it is Frisch who actually confirmed, and named, nuclear fission through discussions with Bohr in Copenhagen. Hahn

2368:

Frisch published their corrected findings in February. During Frisch's experimentation at Neil Bohr's Institute in Copenhagen, which he'd been exiled to since 1934 as a Jewish-Austrian like his aunt Lise. However, it was Bohr who took this news to the USA with Leon Rosenfeld, and it was Rosenfeld who

1498:

I needed a list while writing! All the sources used the old names and while the Knowledge notes them in the "isotopes of..." articles, often you didn't know what element they were. I constructed a table. Each of the old names is followed by a modern one in parentheses. The new names are anachronistic

1013:

Although Hahn was one of the great contributors to the field, I think that the article as it presently stands is overly laudatory, that it suppresses the Meitner contributions, and that it is far too silent on Hahn's continuing to work under and, in some cases, on behalf of the Nazi regime. I believe

936:

Perhaps the "who gets the Nobel Prize" section should be shortened, and I think it is more a question for the Meitner article. To my knowledge the controversy is more about that Meitner did NOT receive the Nobel Prize (of Physics) but not about that Hahn did not deserve to receive the Nobel Prize (of

2408:

the 'father of nuclear fission or nuclear chemistry' and I've never in all my research ever come across anyone labelling Hahn as such in any fashion. All of Hahn's most important achievements are conducted with Meitner during their decades of joint research prior to July 1938 when Meitner was forced

1057:

probably should have recieved a prize. 4) Meitner's insights flowed to Hahn via their letters in the time that Meitner was isolated in Sweden in an unsupportive environment in Manne Siegbahn's institution - she was given minimal assets (money, space, equipment, assistants, etc) to work with. Meitner

1052:

A couple of points: 1) The Nobel prizes are never rescinded, as far as I know. The comittee never does that. 2) Far as I know, they also do not re-award prizes for the same event (discovery, or what have you) to other contributors after the fact. With these two points in mind, I don't see much need

2412:

It remains a black mark on the Nobel committee for the fact Hahn was solely awarded the Prize for Chemistry, and it remains a misogynist and bigoted decision considering Meitner became a Swedish citizen in 1949, and everyone who matter within in physics had nominated Meitner for the prize nearly 40

1340:

I don't think that Meitner and Frisch were involved in the fission experiment until after the data were collected. Their brilliant 1939 paper explained the results obtained by Hahn and Strassmann a year earlier in Berlin, but at that time the actual experiment was complete. My understanding is that

1044:

A good source of info from the Meitner POV is the book "Lise Meitner, A Life in Physics" by Ruth Lewin Sime (herself a physics prof). The book is about Meitner of course, but it is excellently researched - and referenced - and by necessity includes a great deal about her 30 year collaboration with

1072:

In regard to the statement above by anonymous: "Although Hahn was one of the great contributors to the field, I think that the article as it presently stands is overly laudatory, that it suppresses the Meitner contributions, and that it is far too silent on Hahn's continuing to work under and, in

2413:

times before Hahn was awarded it, a fact ignored in Hahn's lede but illustrated on Meitner's page. I feel there needs to be some rather extensive corrections to Hahn's lede and to his overall story post haste regarding his true contributions to nuclear chemistry and by default nuclear physics.

1491:

Can we use a convention to: write contemporary name throughout (when describing a contemporal process). At introduction, add modern name in ()-brackets, and wl'ed (the wl to precise article/section as possible; at least the Isotopes of ... page). Repeat this for every section (ie, introduce an

1062:

In response to the concern mentioned above about Meitner: "Regarding this statement: ". . . and in a controversial survey of Nobel Prize winners conducted forty years later, Lise Meitner was voted the most deserving of those who had not received the award." I see an NPOV problem here. What was

1414:

Hahn’s biographer, Klaus Hoffmann wrote that the news of Hiroshima had so upset Hahn the other Farm Hall internees feared he would commit suicide, and some even kept watch over him that night to ensure he could not do so. The Farm Hall transcript, however, does not support the claim that Hahn

926:

Regarding this statement: ". . . and in a controversial survey of Nobel Prize winners conducted forty years later, Lise Meitner was voted the most deserving of those who had not received the award." I see an NPOV problem here. What was "controversial" about the survey? Who thought it was

1047:

Many people indeed feel Meitner was left on the fringes of the discovery of splitting the atom, and its true she played a key role. Hahn seems to have failed to actively acknowledge her role, but I haven't seen any particular evidence that he actively intended to suppress her contributions

1983:

Die Oberrealschule ist eine ehemalige Schulform in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz, die oft als Alternative zu den meist als Lateinschulen ausgelegten Gymnasien entstand. Sie ermöglichte in der Regel das Studium naturwissenschaftlicher Fächer. Die Bezeichnung wird heute nicht mehr

2369:

told John Dunning and Herbert Anderson who had just begun working with Enrico Fermi (exiled from Fascist Italy due to his wife being Jewish-Italian in December 1938) at Columbia University in New York City. CU physics staff also included Leo Szilard, who is the first person to conceive a

1492:

isotope in every section where it is used; once/article is not helpful IMO). I would not mind when someone uses the symbolic notation also (U), to describe a process (like alpha-decay, or beta-decay). This is better than, as a reader, having to make written notes while reading ;-) )

2245:

The personal history of Otto Hahn should have included an explicit listing of his academic credentials. For example, the article says, "A graduate of the University of Marburg," but does not state what field he graduated from nor the academic level---bachelors? Masters? Doctorate?

911:

I'm confused by this statement: "Later few American Jewish historians considered contributions to have been the greater . . . ." This use of "few" means "not many" and has a definite negative connotation (i.e., it really means the same as "most American Jewish historians did

831: 987:

why dont i see a passage dealing with the controversy surrounding hahn and meitner? i have read in the book "e-mc^2" by david bodanis and also seen a documentary "einstein's big idea"(PBS Nova)that hahn purposefully tried to underplay the influence meitner had on his work

1992:

The Oberrealschule is a former type of school in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, which emerged as an alternative to the gymnasiums, which were mostly designed as Latin schools. As a rule, it made it possible to study natural science subjects. The term is no longer

1297:

The article on Hahn has a brief mention of his involvement in chemical warfare, under "discovery of protactinium." I suggest adding a subhead on chemical warfare, to give this aspect of his life a bit more prominence, with a cross-ref. to the Battle of Caporetto.

1106:

having just read e=mc^2 as well, i thought that the summary at the beginning was a bit of a joke. if you take what's in that book as true, then the line " Considered by many to be a model for scholarly excellence and personal integrity" doesn't make much sense.

1207: 2327:

As per the information I have recently corrected in other articles pertaining to nuclear fission and who did what when, this lede is not correct or accurate in many aspects. It also contradicts other articles quite significantly. Hahn and Strassmann only

1067:

Wiki bio, not Hahn. As far as it being controversial, surveying this type of subject after the fact is bound to be problematic. The survey probably included scientists not even born at the time of events we're discussing. Its basically looking back in

2403:

The circumstances are articulated much more accurately and correctly within the other articles lede, but not on Hahn's for some reason, even though Hahn's links to these articles. Obviously, such corrections should be conducted for Hahn. Also, he is

916:

consider Meitner's contributions to have been the greater". Is this true? If the writer meant Meitner's work was considered by some to have been more important than Hahn's, then I would propose changing "few" to "some", or maybe even "many".

1559:

does not solve this issue: when Hahn discovered new species, they gave odd names to what were isotopes etc. This Hahn article could use a good old-name/current-name translation table in the text, while preventing being illegible ;-)

1580:

Wow! You people are more educated than I but THANK YOU for saying cut & dried! As a word/grammar/spelling person, drives me nuts that people think it's "cut & dry". It's not! Glad to see some actual smart people on here.

2356:

the theoretical data of Hahn and Strassmann whilst Frisch visited his aunty Lise exiled in Sweden later in December, as he regularly did prior to fleeing Nazi Germany himself in 1933. Frisch and Meitner correctly deduced the

1648:

Thanks. I found him a pretty complicated person. The article tells the reader a lot about the development of radiochemistry over a half a century, and also a lot about science in Germany. Note that the it is up for review at

1176:

Do I smell an error here? Then-"Radioactinium" IMHO has nothing to do with actinium, but it's a historical name for the isotope thorium-227! Hence, I don't see why you are linking to the Actinium article here. -andy

962:, by an anonymous user from 217.225.221.201, has removed the question of the controversy completely. For the record, the cut material read as follows, in case people feel it or something like it should go back in: 1599:

Lots of persons are introduced. In some cases I have added qualifications like "physicist" (but not: "American"), to illustrate why that person is of interest. However, there may be too many names to keep this up.

943:

MEITNER L: EINIGE ERINNERUNGEN AN DAS KAISER-WILHELM-INSTITUT FUR CHEMIE IN BERLIN-DAHLEM (Some memories on the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Chemistry in Berlin-Dahlem) NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN 41, 97-99 (1954)

1806:

Hello, I will be reviewing this article. As I am an editor specialized in popular culture and, while a science enthusiast, a non-science editor, I hope my review would be totally unbiased and comprehensive,

2547: 367: 2352:

of the fact they published them mere days afterwards in a German-only publication. Hahn informed Meitner literally that same evening with their findings, but it took Otto Robert Frisch and Meitner to

2267:

provide this. It says: "In 1901, Hahn received his doctorate in Marburg for a dissertation entitled "On Bromine Derivates of Isoeugenol", a topic in classical organic chemistry... Hahn completed his

200: 689: 947:

MEITNER L: ZUR ENTWICKLUNG DER RADIOCHEMIE - HAHN,OTTO ZUM 50 JAHRIGEN DOKTOR-JUBILAUM (On the evolution of radiochemistry - Hahn, Otto to the 50th PhD jubilee), ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE 64, 1-4 (1952)

2542: 56: 2068:

We don't have a template for it. But gold is trading at €52.85 per g, and the pre-1914 mark was worth 0.385 g of gold. that would be worth €20.35 today. So 100 marks would be €2,035.

1488:

How to note isotopes? And wikilink them? They appear in contemporary names (mesothorium I), modern names (uranium-234), uranium X2 (protactinium-234), plus wrong or dead-end names.

2587: 362: 277: 2527: 2607: 679: 52: 2552: 1040:

In response to the two main topics above "Lise Meitner, and 1944 Nobel controversy" by Richwales and "lise meitner and hahn" (unsigned), which should be under one topic:

927:

controversial? Perhaps a more exact, detailed identification of the survey would be in order, together with some discussion of who considered it controversial and why.

2299:

In this section we read that all the captive scientists were held at Chateau Facqueval. This is not referenced but after some searching I found the following article

1511:

but many readers won't know what I'm talking about. I decided not to use the chemical symbols as those of elements like protactinium are not well known. However, the

1757: 78: 64: 2592: 2487: 1688:

Tbh, I don't think I should GAN-promote this article, because I am not familiar with the GAN process at all. Meanwhile, I will truly try to improve the article. -

2376:

The experiments of Fermi and Szilard in New York with Bohr, Dunning, Anderson, etc, concurrently occur when Frisch is conducting his experiments to confirm the

567: 2602: 1747: 885:

Hahn had a strong dislike for Adolf Hitler and his government and told a friend: "If my work would lead to Hitler having an atomic bomb I would kill myself."

579: 484: 2567: 2517: 1606:

General reading: sometimes I added a description (eg for KWS), as a single name may not be clear. Say, at least a section should be understandable without

446: 1294:

In September three experts from the Imperial General Staff led by the chemist Otto Hahn went to the Isonzo front to find a site suitable for a gas attack.

2532: 456: 1344:

Note that the Nobel prize was awarded to Hahn (but not to Strassmann for some reason) for the experiment, and not to Meitner and Frisch for the theory.

2305:

dated in 1993. It is written in French but does confirm that they were held in Chateau Facqueval. Maybe somebody could create a reference in the page.

1724: 2582: 2512: 847: 557: 2622: 2522: 2502: 2344:

Mietner had fled Nazi Germany in July. On 19 December 1938 when Hahn and Strassmann conducted a specific bombardment of uranium with neutrons, they

2161:

I can see there are some "unsourced" awards listed at "Honors and awards" section. I think it's better that all awards have corresponding citations

794: 784: 104: 2572: 2557: 2497: 2087:

Along the way, Hahn determined that just as he was unable to separate thorium from radiothorium, so he could not separate mesothorium from radium.

319: 238: 2118:

Physicists were more accepting of Hahn's work, and he began attending a colloquium at the Physics Institute conducted by Heinrich Rubens. It was

2612: 196: 510: 2627: 2597: 29: 2562: 2537: 1178: 422: 323: 2247: 1373: 1118: 870:

I question the claim on this page that Hahn worked on the German fission weapon program. For example, this article suggests otherwise:

118: 33: 2617: 2577: 760: 533: 327: 2205:

The prose is great! I may have missed some points here and there, and will try to give a second read-through before passing the GAN,

1003: 318:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 2507: 2492: 2182:

I'd consider merging the "Legacy" section somewhere, or just removing it. I personally opt against a section with two sentences

1875:

Overall a well written article. I just have finished reading up to "Discovery of mesothorium I", and have a few minor concerns:

1729: 1752: 413: 390: 314: 272: 110: 655: 642: 603: 2065:

A possible conversion of the German mark to today's value would be helpful in understanding how much did the elements worth

1482:. Not all are cut and dried improvements, for example see my es's. Other questions I met and could not answer completely: 1029: 751: 712: 524: 479: 2457: 2164:

Not really. I had them in prose, but another editor preferred them in point form. I have added refs to each dot point.

1512: 247: 188: 1796: 1998:

The school still exists; it is just called the Klinger Schule today. It has no Knowledge entry. It is named after

2275:. A thesis was not required; the Chemical Institute accepted one of his publications on radioactivity instead." 1197: 183: 71: 1182: 940:

MEITNER L: OTTO HAHN ZUM 85. GEBURTSTAG (Otto Hahn to the 85th birthday), NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN 51, 9 (1964)

2251: 1271:

Is Otto Hahn the inventor of the water-tap (faucet)? In german it translates to Wasserhahn. Just a "theory".

1122: 1369: 1256: 1237: 966:

There was also considerable controversy from anti-Germans and anti-Nazis that he had downplayed the role of

2365:

Frisch who replicated and confirmed it was replicable in mid-January 1939, as Meitner was still in Sweden.

999: 1771: 1192:

If you have a reliable source for radioactinium being thorium-227, I'll change the redirect accordingly.--

891: 92: 2415: 253: 162: 2047:

Thanks for clarifying. For a non-native speaker it's a challenge for me to understand scentific terms,

1153:

The quotes were added back to this article for some reason. I removed them again and added a link to

995: 951: 2340:

on Lise Meitner's theoretical suppositions pertaining to research all three had been conducting, but

1361: 1349: 1303: 1129: 1114: 1017: 991: 896: 1014:

the betrayal of Meitner and Hahn's complicity in removing her from the KWI deserves a mention here.

1288: 1193: 1145: 1021: 759:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

532:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

421:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

2467: 2310: 2281: 2191: 2170: 2146:

Given that the prose is the longest which I've ever reviewed, this GAN may take quite a while. —

2133: 2105: 2074: 2037: 2008: 1954: 1933: 1896: 1884: 1857: 1775: 1659: 1620: 1556: 1532: 1521: 1446: 1437: 1365: 1324: 1252: 1233: 855: 822:

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between

125: 2302: 2300: 1582: 1083: 352: 146: 2223:

Passed the GAN. I have no reasons to withhold the nomination. Brilliant work with the article!

1634:

And this: what an interesting person (=article) to read! A great composition to you editor(s).

1215: 1025: 835: 114: 1693: 1678: 1565: 1098: 647: 634: 306: 618: 597: 32:. A featured article should exemplify Knowledge's best work, and is therefore expected to 1586: 1345: 1299: 1162: 1087: 839: 2228: 2210: 2151: 2052: 1911: 1830: 1812: 1790: 1144:

I took them off of this page and put them in wikiquote, since it seems more appropriate

405: 384: 2444: 1074: 928: 918: 743: 516: 2481: 2462: 2306: 2276: 2186: 2165: 2128: 2100: 2069: 2032: 2003: 1975: 1949: 1928: 1891: 1852: 1654: 1650: 1615: 1540: 1516: 1461: 1441: 1404: 1390: 851: 1232:

Why does the first paragraph not identify him as a discoverer of nuclear fission?

871: 2268: 1396: 1248: 1211: 967: 877: 167: 1890:

I don't like that slang term, but sure. (It is deprecated in MilHist articles.)

2320:

This lede does not conform with other pages on nuclear fission and its discovery

1999: 1689: 1674: 1561: 1273: 1108: 974: 818: 500: 473: 60: 290: 266: 2224: 2206: 2147: 2048: 2028: 1927:

From 3 July 1945 to 3 January 1946. It is in the article. Added to the lead.

1907: 1826: 1808: 1786: 1614:

The abbreviation is KWG. I avoided the use of abbreviations where possible.

1395:- More curious than challenging you: So you are saying the quote is not in a 1158: 733: 727: 706: 624: 506: 296: 2440: 418: 178: 157: 20: 1778:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 1423:

How Experiments Are Remembered: The Discovery of Nuclear Fission, 1938–1968

1948:

deleted this; re-wrote the lead. I never pay much attention to the lead.

890:

If Hahn did participate in some way we should state clearly what he did.

1551: 1536: 1457: 1400: 1318: 2396:

Hahn and Strassmann did not discover nuclear fission nor name it, they

756: 654:

on Knowledge. Please participate by editing this article, or visit the

651: 529: 1880: 326:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 2373:

in 1933 when exiled to London from Nazism as a Jewish-Hungarian.

2324:

Hello to everyone that has contributed to this specific article.

2472: 2448: 2421: 2314: 2286: 2255: 2232: 2214: 2196: 2175: 2155: 2138: 2110: 2079: 2056: 2042: 2013: 1959: 1938: 1915: 1901: 1862: 1834: 1816: 1800: 1697: 1682: 1664: 1625: 1590: 1569: 1544: 1526: 1465: 1451: 1408: 1377: 1358:

Added a citation regarding the diamond ring Hahn gave Meitner.

1353: 1330: 1307: 1277: 1260: 1241: 1219: 1201: 1186: 1166: 1148: 1133: 1101: 1091: 1077: 1033: 1007: 977: 954: 931: 921: 900: 859: 1924:

Any information on from when till when was Hahn incarcenated?

218: 201:

Template:Did you know nominations/Discovery of nuclear fission

141: 87: 15: 2303:

https://www.dissident-media.org/infonucleaire/bombe_reich.pdf

1097:

I put the bit quoted above back in with some modifications.--

1610:

to click a link. IUPAC, OTOH, may taking up too much space.

351: 206: 19: 1945:"Considered by many" is vague; any possible attribution? 1825:

There is a mantainance tag in the "Early life" section.

1434:

Hitler’s Uranium Club: The Secret Recordings at Farm Hall

1206:

I just noticed this today and I have found a source. See

2548:

Mid-importance biography (science and academia) articles

2089:→ This sounds a bit off, was there a grammatical error? 1479: 960: 131: 42: 2431:

I think the article is in British English, as we have

1154: 199:. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at 813:

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

2393:and from which each team continued their research. 755:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 528:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 417:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2543:GA-Class biography (science and academia) articles 1887:, given that the term "nazism" is more well-known 1399:? How are you certain it didn't happen? --John ( 1317:A record for this person has been created in the 872:http://www.britannica.com/nobel/micro/254_40.html 2454:Sure. Concur with your tagging the article with 878:http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/GERhahn.htm 117:. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can 65:update the nomination page and article talk page 1990: 1980: 1412: 2380:of Hanh and Strassmann's findings, thus it is 1336:Meitner did not bombard uranium with neutrons 8: 2588:GA-Class physics articles of High-importance 2528:Knowledge level-4 vital articles in People 1707: 1359: 1127: 1015: 989: 894: 701: 592: 468: 379: 261: 2608:Low-importance chemical elements articles 2398:accidentally observed it and got it wrong 2336:when they conducted specific experiments 1966:I think we need a literal translation of 848:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment 170:). The text of the entry was as follows: 2553:Science and academia work group articles 2027:That's in English. Removed the italics. 1283:A bit more about chemical warfare in WWI 1208:Joseph Angelo, Nuclear Technology, p.117 907:Lise Meitner, and 1944 Nobel controversy 646:, which gives a central approach to the 2124:→ Unsure of what the bolded text means 1738: 1710: 1421:Yruma, Jeris Stueland (November 2008). 1321:genealogical website. --User:Ceyockey ( 846:Above undated message substituted from 703: 594: 470: 381: 263: 2117: 2086: 197:Knowledge:Recent additions/2020/August 2593:GA-Class physics biographies articles 2488:Knowledge featured article candidates 195:A record of the entry may be seen at 7: 2439:. It really needs to be consistent. 2271:in the spring of 1907, and became a 2093: 749:This article is within the scope of 522:This article is within the scope of 411:This article is within the scope of 312:This article is within the scope of 224: 222: 2603:GA-Class chemical elements articles 2361:of Hahn and Strassmann, but it was 1456:Sounds reasonable. Thanks --John ( 1425:(PhD thesis). Princeton University. 363:the science and academia work group 252:It is of interest to the following 182:was the sole recipient of the 1944 2568:High-importance Chemistry articles 2518:Knowledge vital articles in People 2022:On Bromine Derivates of Isoeugenol 827: 823: 51:After one of the FAC coordinators 14: 2533:GA-Class vital articles in People 1979:as "high school". Knowledge says 207: 113:. If you can improve it further, 2583:High-importance physics articles 2513:Knowledge level-4 vital articles 2384:Frisch and Meitner who actually 2094: 1843: 1638: 1515:article uses them extensively. 830:. Further details are available 817: 736: 726: 705: 627: 617: 596: 509: 499: 472: 404: 383: 299: 289: 265: 232: 223: 145: 91: 2623:Mid-importance Germany articles 2523:GA-Class level-4 vital articles 2503:Knowledge Did you know articles 1432:I've checked Jeremy Bernstein, 789:This article has been rated as 684:This article has been rated as 562:This article has been rated as 451:This article has been rated as 431:Knowledge:WikiProject Chemistry 336:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography 2573:WikiProject Chemistry articles 2558:WikiProject Biography articles 2498:Natural sciences good articles 2473:19:31, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 2449:10:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 2307:Everybody got to be somewhere! 2185:Moved to the awards section. 1220:02:45, 11 September 2011 (UTC) 664:Knowledge:WikiProject Elements 434:Template:WikiProject Chemistry 339:Template:WikiProject Biography 105:Natural sciences good articles 101:has been listed as one of the 1: 2613:WikiProject Elements articles 2287:23:32, 26 February 2023 (UTC) 2256:17:37, 26 February 2023 (UTC) 2127:Colloquia. Added that word. 1906:Interesting... I wonder why. 1308:20:48, 14 November 2014 (UTC) 1228:Discoverer of Nuclear Fission 932:19:39, 18 November 2005 (UTC) 922:19:39, 18 November 2005 (UTC) 769:Knowledge:WikiProject Germany 763:and see a list of open tasks. 667:Template:WikiProject Elements 640:This article is supported by 577:This article is supported by 542:Knowledge:WikiProject Physics 536:and see a list of open tasks. 425:and see a list of open tasks. 360:This article is supported by 67:. Do not manually update the 2628:WikiProject Germany articles 2598:Physics biographies articles 2315:23:48, 7 February 2024 (UTC) 1513:Discovery of nuclear fission 1378:02:28, 31 October 2016 (UTC) 1149:06:11, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 1034:16:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 1008:04:32, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 955:19:21, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 860:05:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC) 772:Template:WikiProject Germany 545:Template:WikiProject Physics 324:contribute to the discussion 189:discovery of nuclear fission 2563:GA-Class Chemistry articles 2538:GA-Class biography articles 2233:04:37, 28 August 2020 (UTC) 2215:02:05, 27 August 2020 (UTC) 2197:03:57, 27 August 2020 (UTC) 2176:03:57, 27 August 2020 (UTC) 2156:04:26, 26 August 2020 (UTC) 2139:06:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC) 2111:06:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC) 2080:06:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC) 2057:06:39, 26 August 2020 (UTC) 2043:06:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC) 2014:06:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC) 1960:06:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC) 1939:06:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC) 1916:06:40, 26 August 2020 (UTC) 1902:06:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC) 1863:07:51, 25 August 2020 (UTC) 1835:07:45, 25 August 2020 (UTC) 1817:07:26, 25 August 2020 (UTC) 1801:07:26, 25 August 2020 (UTC) 1591:05:25, 9 January 2024 (UTC) 1261:02:11, 13 August 2013 (UTC) 1242:21:15, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 1202:16:37, 9 January 2011 (UTC) 1187:16:01, 9 January 2011 (UTC) 1167:15:40, 4 January 2008 (UTC) 1092:05:13, 9 January 2024 (UTC) 978:17:27, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 2644: 1102:04:06, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 795:project's importance scale 670:chemical elements articles 568:project's importance scale 457:project's importance scale 166:column on 30 August 2020 ( 30:featured article candidate 28:This article is a current 2618:GA-Class Germany articles 2578:GA-Class physics articles 2031:is an organic compound. 1683:18:55, 30 June 2020 (UTC) 1665:22:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC) 1639: 1626:22:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC) 1527:22:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC) 1331:17:38, 7 March 2015 (UTC) 1278:10:34, 26 June 2014 (UTC) 1078:00:12, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 901:03:13, 26 June 2004 (UTC) 788: 721: 683: 612: 576: 561: 494: 450: 399: 359: 284: 260: 2422:00:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC) 2378:correct reinterpretation 1698:20:40, 5 July 2020 (UTC) 1570:20:51, 5 July 2020 (UTC) 1545:02:47, 1 July 2020 (UTC) 1466:22:33, 6 June 2020 (UTC) 1452:20:47, 6 June 2020 (UTC) 1409:19:16, 6 June 2020 (UTC) 1134:06:19, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 184:Nobel Prize in Chemistry 156:appeared on Knowledge's 2508:GA-Class vital articles 2493:Knowledge good articles 2024:(I am not sure though) 1970:(is it a high school?) 1883:would be preferable to 1851:Removed drive-by tag. 1354:17:13, 9 May 2015 (UTC) 2371:nuclear chain reaction 1995: 1987: 1968:Klinger Oberrealschule 1429: 356: 212: 24: 2295:Incarceration section 1535:of any help? --John ( 1155:Otto Hahn's wikiquote 983:lise meitner and hahn 834:. Student editor(s): 580:Biographies Taskforce 414:WikiProject Chemistry 355: 315:WikiProject Biography 239:level-4 vital article 210: 111:good article criteria 23: 2332:nuclear fission and 1111:11:18, 7 July 2011 643:WikiProject Elements 278:Science and Academia 129:: August 28, 2020. ( 38:Please feel free to 2458:Use British English 2354:correctly interpret 1289:Battle of Caporetto 1287:The article on the 1267:water-tap or faucet 752:WikiProject Germany 525:WikiProject Physics 79:when the FAC closes 1973:I would translate 1885:national socialism 1776:Talk:Otto Hahn/GA1 1478:Today I made some 876:So does this one: 838:. Peer reviewers: 832:on the course page 437:Chemistry articles 357: 342:biography articles 248:content assessment 213: 186:, awarded for the 25: 2409:to flee Berlin. 2002:, the sculptor. 1766: 1765: 1474:Thoughts on edits 1380: 1364:comment added by 1328: 1295: 1251:for fixing this. 1140:quotes about hahn 1136: 1117:comment added by 1036: 1020:comment added by 1010: 994:comment added by 903: 892:Peter Hendrickson 809: 808: 805: 804: 801: 800: 700: 699: 696: 695: 658:for more details. 648:chemical elements 591: 590: 587: 586: 467: 466: 463: 462: 378: 377: 374: 373: 217: 216: 140: 139: 136: 86: 85: 82: 34:meet the criteria 2635: 2470: 2465: 2461: 2420: 2418: 2417:WolfStonerRocker 2284: 2279: 2241:Academic history 2194: 2189: 2173: 2168: 2136: 2131: 2108: 2103: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2077: 2072: 2040: 2035: 2011: 2006: 1957: 1952: 1936: 1931: 1899: 1894: 1860: 1855: 1850: 1847: 1846: 1720:Copyvio detector 1708: 1662: 1657: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1623: 1618: 1555: 1524: 1519: 1510: 1508: 1507: 1449: 1444: 1427: 1426: 1394: 1322: 1293: 1276: 1126: 959:The latest edit 862: 829: 825: 821: 777: 776: 775:Germany articles 773: 770: 767: 746: 741: 740: 739: 730: 723: 722: 717: 709: 702: 690:importance scale 672: 671: 668: 665: 662: 637: 635:Chemistry portal 632: 631: 630: 621: 614: 613: 608: 600: 593: 550: 549: 548:physics articles 546: 543: 540: 519: 514: 513: 503: 496: 495: 490: 487: 476: 469: 439: 438: 435: 432: 429: 408: 401: 400: 395: 387: 380: 344: 343: 340: 337: 334: 320:join the project 309: 307:Biography portal 304: 303: 302: 293: 286: 285: 280: 269: 262: 245: 236: 235: 228: 227: 226: 219: 209: 149: 142: 134: 132:Reviewed version 123: 95: 88: 76: 70: 59:the nomination, 50: 48: 16: 2643: 2642: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2478: 2477: 2468: 2463: 2455: 2429: 2416: 2414: 2348:their findings 2322: 2297: 2282: 2277: 2243: 2192: 2187: 2171: 2166: 2134: 2129: 2120:at one of these 2106: 2101: 2095: 2075: 2070: 2038: 2033: 2009: 2004: 1955: 1950: 1934: 1929: 1897: 1892: 1873: 1858: 1853: 1848: 1844: 1770:This review is 1762: 1734: 1706: 1660: 1655: 1637: 1635: 1621: 1616: 1549: 1522: 1517: 1506: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1476: 1447: 1442: 1428: 1420: 1419: 1397:reliable source 1388: 1386: 1338: 1315: 1285: 1272: 1269: 1230: 1174: 1172:"Radioactinium" 1142: 1112: 985: 909: 868: 845: 824:13 January 2020 815: 774: 771: 768: 765: 764: 742: 737: 735: 715: 669: 666: 663: 660: 659: 633: 628: 626: 606: 564:High-importance 547: 544: 541: 538: 537: 515: 508: 489:High‑importance 488: 482: 453:High-importance 436: 433: 430: 427: 426: 394:High‑importance 393: 341: 338: 335: 332: 331: 305: 300: 298: 275: 246:on Knowledge's 243: 233: 130: 74: 72:Article history 68: 55:the article or 39: 12: 11: 5: 2641: 2639: 2631: 2630: 2625: 2620: 2615: 2610: 2605: 2600: 2595: 2590: 2585: 2580: 2575: 2570: 2565: 2560: 2555: 2550: 2545: 2540: 2535: 2530: 2525: 2520: 2515: 2510: 2505: 2500: 2495: 2490: 2480: 2479: 2476: 2475: 2428: 2425: 2346:misinterpreted 2321: 2318: 2296: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2242: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2218: 2217: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2018: 2017: 2016: 1996: 1988: 1976:Oberrealschule 1964: 1963: 1962: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1872: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1838: 1837: 1805: 1781: 1780: 1764: 1763: 1761: 1760: 1755: 1750: 1744: 1741: 1740: 1736: 1735: 1733: 1732: 1730:External links 1727: 1722: 1716: 1713: 1712: 1705: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1668: 1667: 1629: 1628: 1594: 1593: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1504: 1503: 1475: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1417: 1385: 1382: 1337: 1334: 1314: 1311: 1296: 1292: 1284: 1281: 1268: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1229: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1194:Roentgenium111 1179:77.191.205.168 1173: 1170: 1146:Acornwithwings 1141: 1138: 1132:comment added 1095: 1094: 1080: 1070: 1069: 1060: 1059: 1050: 1049: 1046: 1042: 1041: 984: 981: 972: 971: 908: 905: 899:comment added 888: 887: 867: 864: 814: 811: 810: 807: 806: 803: 802: 799: 798: 791:Mid-importance 787: 781: 780: 778: 761:the discussion 748: 747: 744:Germany portal 731: 719: 718: 716:Mid‑importance 710: 698: 697: 694: 693: 686:Low-importance 682: 676: 675: 673: 639: 638: 622: 610: 609: 607:Low‑importance 601: 589: 588: 585: 584: 575: 572: 571: 560: 554: 553: 551: 534:the discussion 521: 520: 517:Physics portal 504: 492: 491: 477: 465: 464: 461: 460: 449: 443: 442: 440: 423:the discussion 409: 397: 396: 388: 376: 375: 372: 371: 368:Mid-importance 358: 348: 347: 345: 311: 310: 294: 282: 281: 270: 258: 257: 251: 229: 215: 214: 204: 194: 193: 150: 138: 137: 122: 96: 84: 83: 49: 43:leave comments 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2640: 2629: 2626: 2624: 2621: 2619: 2616: 2614: 2611: 2609: 2606: 2604: 2601: 2599: 2596: 2594: 2591: 2589: 2586: 2584: 2581: 2579: 2576: 2574: 2571: 2569: 2566: 2564: 2561: 2559: 2556: 2554: 2551: 2549: 2546: 2544: 2541: 2539: 2536: 2534: 2531: 2529: 2526: 2524: 2521: 2519: 2516: 2514: 2511: 2509: 2506: 2504: 2501: 2499: 2496: 2494: 2491: 2489: 2486: 2485: 2483: 2474: 2471: 2466: 2459: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2446: 2442: 2438: 2434: 2426: 2424: 2423: 2419: 2410: 2407: 2401: 2399: 2394: 2392: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2374: 2372: 2366: 2364: 2360: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2325: 2319: 2317: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2301: 2294: 2288: 2285: 2280: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2248:38.124.147.11 2240: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2216: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2203: 2198: 2195: 2190: 2184: 2183: 2181: 2177: 2174: 2169: 2163: 2162: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2140: 2137: 2132: 2126: 2125: 2123: 2121: 2116: 2112: 2109: 2104: 2091: 2090: 2088: 2085: 2081: 2078: 2073: 2067: 2066: 2064: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2041: 2036: 2030: 2026: 2025: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2012: 2007: 2001: 1997: 1994: 1989: 1986: 1985: 1978: 1977: 1972: 1971: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1958: 1953: 1947: 1946: 1944: 1940: 1937: 1932: 1926: 1925: 1923: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1900: 1895: 1889: 1888: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1870: 1864: 1861: 1856: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1823:Quick comment 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1803: 1802: 1798: 1795: 1792: 1788: 1785: 1779: 1777: 1773: 1768: 1767: 1759: 1756: 1754: 1751: 1749: 1746: 1745: 1743: 1742: 1737: 1731: 1728: 1726: 1723: 1721: 1718: 1717: 1715: 1714: 1709: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1666: 1663: 1658: 1652: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1633: 1627: 1624: 1619: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1598: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1579: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1558: 1553: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1525: 1520: 1514: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1489: 1487: 1483: 1481: 1473: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1450: 1445: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1430: 1424: 1416: 1411: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1392: 1384:Removed Quote 1383: 1381: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1366:MrColeJohnson 1363: 1356: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1342: 1335: 1333: 1332: 1327: 1326: 1320: 1312: 1310: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1290: 1282: 1280: 1279: 1275: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1253:HowardMorland 1250: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1234:HowardMorland 1227: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1171: 1169: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1151: 1150: 1147: 1139: 1137: 1135: 1131: 1124: 1120: 1119:98.207.49.104 1116: 1110: 1104: 1103: 1100: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1079: 1076: 1071: 1066: 1061: 1056: 1051: 1043: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1011: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 982: 980: 979: 976: 969: 965: 964: 963: 961: 957: 956: 953: 948: 945: 941: 938: 934: 933: 930: 924: 923: 920: 915: 906: 904: 902: 898: 893: 886: 883: 882: 881: 879: 874: 873: 865: 863: 861: 857: 853: 849: 843: 841: 837: 833: 820: 812: 796: 792: 786: 783: 782: 779: 762: 758: 754: 753: 745: 734: 732: 729: 725: 724: 720: 714: 711: 708: 704: 691: 687: 681: 678: 677: 674: 657: 653: 649: 645: 644: 636: 625: 623: 620: 616: 615: 611: 605: 602: 599: 595: 582: 581: 574: 573: 569: 565: 559: 556: 555: 552: 535: 531: 527: 526: 518: 512: 507: 505: 502: 498: 497: 493: 486: 481: 478: 475: 471: 458: 454: 448: 445: 444: 441: 424: 420: 416: 415: 410: 407: 403: 402: 398: 392: 389: 386: 382: 369: 366:(assessed as 365: 364: 354: 350: 349: 346: 329: 328:documentation 325: 321: 317: 316: 308: 297: 295: 292: 288: 287: 283: 279: 274: 271: 268: 264: 259: 255: 249: 241: 240: 230: 221: 220: 205: 202: 198: 191: 190: 185: 181: 180: 175: 172: 171: 169: 165: 164: 159: 155: 151: 148: 144: 143: 133: 128: 127: 120: 116: 112: 108: 107: 106: 100: 97: 94: 90: 89: 80: 73: 66: 62: 58: 54: 46: 45: 44: 35: 31: 27: 22: 18: 17: 2436: 2432: 2430: 2411: 2405: 2402: 2397: 2395: 2390: 2385: 2381: 2377: 2375: 2370: 2367: 2362: 2358: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2334:accidentally 2333: 2329: 2326: 2323: 2298: 2273:Privatdozent 2272: 2269:habilitation 2264: 2263:The article 2244: 2145: 2119: 2021: 1991: 1982: 1981: 1974: 1967: 1874: 1822: 1804: 1793: 1783: 1782: 1769: 1758:Instructions 1673:(sign OP): - 1670: 1669: 1631: 1630: 1607: 1603: 1602: 1596: 1595: 1490: 1485: 1484: 1477: 1433: 1422: 1413: 1387: 1360:— Preceding 1357: 1343: 1339: 1323: 1316: 1286: 1270: 1249:User:Dirac66 1231: 1175: 1152: 1143: 1128:— Preceding 1113:— Preceding 1105: 1096: 1064: 1054: 1016:— Preceding 1012: 990:— Preceding 986: 973: 968:Lise Meitner 958: 949: 946: 942: 939: 935: 925: 913: 910: 895:— Preceding 889: 884: 875: 869: 844: 836:Megracquelle 816: 790: 750: 685: 656:project page 641: 578: 563: 523: 452: 412: 361: 313: 254:WikiProjects 237: 187: 177: 174:Did you know 173: 163:Did you know 161: 153: 152:A fact from 124: 115:please do so 103: 102: 98: 41: 40: 2359:observation 2092:It's fine. 2020:Ditto with 2000:Max Klinger 1772:transcluded 1557:WP:CHEMNAME 1533:WP:CHEMNAME 1438:WP:NOTFALSE 1274:User:ScotXW 1099:Gloriamarie 996:Tirthkpatel 952:Linksrechts 828:16 May 2020 485:Biographies 168:check views 2482:Categories 2433:travelling 2350:regardless 2029:Isoeugenol 1984:verwendet. 1725:Authorship 1711:GA toolbox 1346:Rwflammang 1325:talk to me 1300:Oaklandguy 1247:Thanks to 1068:hindsight. 840:Amakhlouf1 650:and their 109:under the 2469:(discuss) 2283:(discuss) 2193:(discuss) 2172:(discuss) 2135:(discuss) 2107:(discuss) 2076:(discuss) 2039:(discuss) 2010:(discuss) 1956:(discuss) 1935:(discuss) 1898:(discuss) 1859:(discuss) 1784:Reviewer: 1748:Templates 1739:Reviewing 1704:GA Review 1661:(discuss) 1622:(discuss) 1523:(discuss) 1448:(discuss) 1075:Engr105th 929:Richwales 919:Richwales 428:Chemistry 419:chemistry 391:Chemistry 333:Biography 273:Biography 242:is rated 211:Knowledge 179:Otto Hahn 176:... that 158:Main Page 154:Otto Hahn 99:Otto Hahn 77:template 2464:Hawkeye7 2386:discover 2330:observed 2278:Hawkeye7 2188:Hawkeye7 2167:Hawkeye7 2130:Hawkeye7 2102:Hawkeye7 2071:Hawkeye7 2034:Hawkeye7 2005:Hawkeye7 1951:Hawkeye7 1930:Hawkeye7 1893:Hawkeye7 1879:I think 1854:Hawkeye7 1797:contribs 1753:Criteria 1656:Hawkeye7 1636:Hawkeye7 1617:Hawkeye7 1537:User:Jwy 1518:Hawkeye7 1480:65 edits 1458:User:Jwy 1443:Hawkeye7 1401:User:Jwy 1391:Hawkeye7 1374:contribs 1362:unsigned 1319:WeRelate 1313:WeRelate 1115:unsigned 1030:contribs 1018:unsigned 1004:contribs 992:unsigned 866:Untitled 852:PrimeBOT 661:Elements 652:isotopes 604:Elements 244:GA-class 119:reassess 57:archives 53:promotes 1212:Dirac66 1157:page. – 1130:undated 1048:either. 1022:Danite1 897:undated 793:on the 766:Germany 757:Germany 713:Germany 688:on the 566:on the 539:Physics 530:Physics 480:Physics 455:on the 160:in the 2437:honour 2427:ENGVAR 2391:Nature 1881:nazism 1871:Review 1690:DePiep 1675:DePiep 1651:WP:GAN 1608:having 1562:DePiep 1291:says: 1109:att159 975:Jheald 250:scale. 126:Review 2342:after 2338:based 2122:where 1993:used. 1774:from 1583:Mlgcb 1159:panda 1084:Mlgcb 1082:yes! 1045:Hahn. 231:This 63:will 61:a bot 2445:talk 2441:John 2435:and 2382:only 2363:only 2311:talk 2265:does 2252:talk 2229:talk 2211:talk 2152:talk 2053:talk 1912:talk 1831:talk 1813:talk 1791:talk 1694:talk 1679:talk 1587:talk 1566:talk 1541:talk 1462:talk 1405:talk 1370:talk 1350:talk 1304:talk 1257:talk 1238:talk 1216:talk 1198:talk 1183:talk 1163:talk 1123:talk 1088:talk 1055:Both 1026:talk 1000:talk 856:talk 826:and 558:High 447:High 322:and 2406:not 1653:. 1552:Jwy 1531:Is 1440:. 1065:her 914:not 850:by 785:Mid 680:Low 121:it. 2484:: 2460:}} 2456:{{ 2447:) 2313:) 2254:) 2231:) 2225:HĐ 2213:) 2207:HĐ 2154:) 2148:HĐ 2055:) 2049:HĐ 1914:) 1908:HĐ 1833:) 1827:HĐ 1815:) 1809:HĐ 1799:) 1787:HĐ 1696:) 1681:) 1671:5. 1632:4. 1604:3. 1597:2. 1589:) 1568:) 1543:) 1509:Pa 1505:92 1486:1. 1464:) 1418:— 1407:) 1376:) 1372:• 1352:) 1329:) 1306:) 1259:) 1240:) 1218:) 1200:) 1185:) 1165:) 1125:) 1107:-- 1090:) 1032:) 1028:• 1006:) 1002:• 950:-- 880:: 858:) 842:. 483:: 370:). 276:: 135:). 75:}} 69:{{ 2443:( 2309:( 2250:( 2227:( 2209:( 2150:( 2051:( 1910:( 1849:Y 1829:( 1811:( 1794:· 1789:( 1692:( 1677:( 1585:( 1564:( 1560:- 1554:: 1550:@ 1539:/ 1460:/ 1403:/ 1393:: 1389:@ 1368:( 1348:( 1302:( 1255:( 1236:( 1214:( 1196:( 1181:( 1161:( 1121:( 1086:( 1024:( 998:( 854:( 797:. 692:. 583:. 570:. 459:. 330:. 256:: 203:. 192:? 81:. 47:. 36:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index