252:
Abingdon West), but more often, portions of two or more of the old divisions were combined under a new name. If all of the constituent divisions were of the same party, it might be fair to state that, for example, Banbury
Calthorpe was a "Labour gain from Conservative" because although there had been no previous Banbury Calthorpe division, all of the four divisions (Banbury Easington; Banbury Grimsbury & Castle; Banbury Neithrop; Bloxham) from which it was formed had been Conservative previously. But this is not always the case, particularly when one of the old divisions had had two councillors, with different party allegiances. For example, the new Headington & Quarry division was won by the Liberal Democrats; but it was formed from portions of Barton & Churchill (one Labour & Co-operative, one Liberal Democrat) and portions of Headington & Marston (one Liberal Democrat and one Labour). Since 50% of the previous councillors had not been Liberal Democrat, is it fair to describe it as a Liberal Democrat hold?
78:
60:
160:
142:
290:
is that there is no 'gain/loss' for any changed seats, nor is there a swing. The exception is where an academic exercise has been done to map old constituencies to new ones. I don't suppose this has been done for the
Oxfordshire CC seats, so the gain/loss information is meaningless and should be removed. There is of course nothing wrong with comparing the total seats in the council before and after.
33:
376:
It is a misrepresentation of the name of a candidate to arbitrarily remove all but two (the first and last) of the words which make up his or her name. In the first place, you don't know that the first word is their everyday forename; in the second place, this gives the wrong surname to people with
289:
I have only just seen this comment, and I agree with your view. Firstly, although there are links to all the division results, these sources say nothing about gains and losses. Secondly, the normal practice in the case of boundary changes, for example in a general election after a boundary review,
372:
When I added the candidates to this page, I carefully copied the names from the lists given on the
Oxfordshire County Council website; and checked them again after the results were announced. These lists - prepared as they were by the staff of the Returning Officer - must be considered official. I
251:
The remaining 39 divisions - almost two-thirds of the County
Council - were created by redrawing the division boundaries, in many cases radically. Sometimes, a new division would consist entirely of territory from just one of the old (for example, Abingdon South was formed entirely from part of
243:
Four divisions retained both name and boundaries, these were: Abingdon East; Didcot
Ladygrove; Grove & Wantage; and Shrivenham. One division changed its name, although its boundaries were unaltered: Witney East became Witney North & East. For these five, a gain/hold comparison is fair.
247:
A further 17 divisions (such as
Abingdon North) retained their names, but their boundaries were changed. In each case, territory was gained from one or more other divisions; and in five cases, territory was also lost to other divisions. The territory gained or lost was not always of the same
428:, I do not believe middle names should be included. The only place for them is in the article about the person. Obviously if someone has a double-barrel surname, then both should be included. I don't think there is a guideline about this, so consensus has to be achieved here.
523:
338:
Please see here for an example of the common names and therefor the names used by the parties and the candidates for the
Conservatives to promoted their candidates. This is clearly first name and last name only
118:
124:
518:
94:
533:
528:
85:
65:
395:
between the two words of the surname. I can't give an immediate example of a candidate in
Oxfordshire 2013 who goes by a name that isn't the first name; but such people
481:
has lists of all the candidates with surnames in capital letters or on a separate row to mark them apart, so that should help identify any with double barrel names.
185:
167:
147:
361:
what the policy or guideline was that justified the shortening of candidates names. You have not provided one. The website of one political party is not a
478:
266:
258:
235:
227:
77:
59:
425:
311:
492:
439:
90:
358:
347:
321:
40:
477:
The website provided by Sports and politics is a good start for the
Conservative candidates. Local media too - the
384:
17:
343:
317:
497:
472:
444:
419:
351:
325:
299:
283:
295:
46:
487:
468:
434:
415:
279:
93:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
171:, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to
404:
391:- the email address is david.nimmo-smith ... with a dot between forename and surname, but a
373:
gave each and every one of them as a source, which is why the article has over 60 references.
291:
179:
482:
461:
451:
429:
408:
272:
340:
159:
141:
512:
377:
unhyphenated two-word surnames. The second case may be demonstrated with a check of
271:
to all of the divisions without a third-party source to verify these conclusions. --
362:
400:
308:
There is a very very simple solution to this simply use the following template
183:
and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit
383:, David Roger Nimmo Smith, whose surname is not Smith but Nimmo Smith; see
248:
political allegiance, so a gain/hold comparison is not necessarily fair.
173:
407:
who falls into both groups. We wouldn't call him George Smith. --
240:
to the divisional results - I think that these are misleading.
26:
316:
for the seats which have had significant boundary changes.
524:
Unknown-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
379:
103:
Knowledge:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
89:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
106:
Template:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
39:This article has not yet been rated on Knowledge's
519:Unassessed Politics of the United Kingdom articles
123:This article has not yet received a rating on the
195:Knowledge:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
534:WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles
198:Template:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
18:Talk:Oxfordshire County Council election, 2013
529:Unassessed Elections and Referendums articles
255:I therefore feel that is misleading to apply
8:
369:candidate who does not belong to that party.
224:Regarding the recent edits which have added
380:the winner of the Henley-on-Thames division
399:exist, and in the current cabinet we have
136:
86:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
54:
32:
30:
359:User talk:Sport and politics#Middle names
138:
109:Politics of the United Kingdom articles
56:
168:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
7:
165:This article is within the scope of
83:This article is within the scope of
45:It is of interest to the following
456:How should the shortened named be
201:Elections and Referendums articles
25:
342:. Other parties can be provided.
267:Election box hold with party link
259:Election box gain with party link
236:Election box hold with party link
228:Election box gain with party link
158:
140:
76:
58:
31:
300:19:32, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
100:Politics of the United Kingdom
91:Politics of the United Kingdom
66:Politics of the United Kingdom
1:
498:19:39, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
473:19:32, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
445:19:18, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
420:16:54, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
352:00:10, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
97:and see a list of open tasks.
426:WP:Elections and referendums
385:Councillor David Nimmo Smith
326:18:46, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
284:11:41, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
550:
389:Oxfordshire County Council
125:project's importance scale
312:Election box new seat win
192:Elections and Referendums
153:
148:Elections and Referendums
122:
71:
53:
405:George Iain Duncan Smith
403:- and then there is
401:John Vincent Cable
344:Sport and politics
318:Sport and politics
41:content assessment
424:Coming here from
365:for the names of
217:
216:
213:
212:
209:
208:
135:
134:
131:
130:
16:(Redirected from
541:
495:
490:
485:
464:
455:
442:
437:
432:
411:
382:
315:
275:
270:
262:
239:
231:
203:
202:
199:
196:
193:
186:our project page
180:electoral reform
162:
155:
154:
144:
137:
111:
110:
107:
104:
101:
80:
73:
72:
62:
55:
36:
35:
34:
27:
21:
549:
548:
544:
543:
542:
540:
539:
538:
509:
508:
493:
488:
483:
462:
449:
440:
435:
430:
409:
378:
336:
309:
273:
264:
256:
233:
225:
222:
220:Gains and holds
200:
197:
194:
191:
190:
108:
105:
102:
99:
98:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
547:
545:
537:
536:
531:
526:
521:
511:
510:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
460:determined? --
374:
370:
335:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
303:
302:
221:
218:
215:
214:
211:
210:
207:
206:
204:
163:
151:
150:
145:
133:
132:
129:
128:
121:
115:
114:
112:
95:the discussion
81:
69:
68:
63:
51:
50:
44:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
546:
535:
532:
530:
527:
525:
522:
520:
517:
516:
514:
499:
496:
491:
486:
480:
476:
475:
474:
470:
466:
459:
453:
448:
447:
446:
443:
438:
433:
427:
423:
422:
421:
417:
413:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
381:
375:
371:
368:
364:
360:
356:
355:
354:
353:
349:
345:
341:
333:
327:
323:
319:
313:
307:
306:
305:
304:
301:
297:
293:
288:
287:
286:
285:
281:
277:
268:
260:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
229:
219:
205:
188:
187:
182:
181:
176:
175:
170:
169:
164:
161:
157:
156:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
126:
120:
117:
116:
113:
96:
92:
88:
87:
82:
79:
75:
74:
70:
67:
64:
61:
57:
52:
48:
42:
38:
29:
28:
19:
479:Oxford Times
457:
396:
392:
388:
366:
337:
254:
250:
246:
242:
223:
184:
178:
172:
166:
84:
47:WikiProjects
357:I asked at
292:Sussexonian
513:Categories
334:Full names
452:Number 57
174:elections
458:reliably
484:Number
465:rose64
431:Number
412:rose64
393:hyphen
276:rose64
43:scale.
363:WP:RS
469:talk
416:talk
348:talk
322:talk
296:talk
280:talk
263:and
232:and
463:Red
410:Red
387:at
367:any
274:Red
119:???
515::
471:)
418:)
397:do
350:)
324:)
314:}}
310:{{
298:)
282:)
269:}}
265:{{
261:}}
257:{{
238:}}
234:{{
230:}}
226:{{
177:,
494:7
489:5
467:(
454::
450:@
441:7
436:5
414:(
346:(
320:(
294:(
278:(
189:.
127:.
49::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
