42:
243:
Thanks for the review and the suggestions. It looks like I have my work cut out for me on this one. I'll take your great ideas and see if I can't improve the article. After I think I am done, THEN I'll run it through GOCE to have it polished as you suggest. I'm thinking all this will take me a month
197:
Dunn: "In 1589 Henri IV (1553–1610) attacked Paris. With her husband away in the army, Louise fled behind the walls of the city..." → "King Henri IV attacked Paris in 1589; Bourgeois had three children at the time. Bourgeois fled behind the city walls of Paris with her children for protection, since
210:
There are also some tone/neutrality issues. In the lead, there is a mention of
Boursier raising the status of the profession from folklore to science, but there seems to be little support for this idea even in the body of the entry.
187:
Goodell: "she was taught to read and write" → "she was taught to read and write" (this might be worth leaving out, as it can be inferred from her becoming the first woman to write about childbirth practices)
218:
A GOCE request may also be helpful for this article; there are some odd constructions, such as "which however did not bring in enough money..." and "just outside Paris called, the".
203:
Perkins: "the examining panel had to consist of a physician, two surgeons, and two midwives" → "The examining panel consisted of a physician, 2 surgeons, and 2 experienced midwives"
126:
47:
122:
80:
107:
70:
99:
52:
207:
These were just examples that I noted from the early portions of the article. The rest of the entry needs to be reviewed for this issue.
156:
165:
I will be happy to review this. Thanks to the nominator for his interest in improving
Knowledge's coverage of science and medicine.
75:
115:
92:
221:
I am sure that we can work on the writing issues, but copyright problems fall under the quick fail criteria at
250:
233:
170:
150:
183:, or the use of wording from another source with only superficial modification. Here are a few examples:
212:
192:
Perkins: "then probably by 1586, and certainly by 1588" → "then probably by 1586 and definitely by 1588"
17:
246:
229:
166:
146:
222:
180:
254:
237:
174:
160:
179:
As I read this entry, I am concerned about copyright problems, specifically
134:
103:
225:and should be addressed before re-nomination.
8:
30:
215:may be helpful to stamp out such issues.
245:AFTER that then I'll renominate GAN. --
228:Thank you for your work on this entry.
61:
33:
7:
198:her husband was away in the army."
24:
1:
255:14:14, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
238:13:44, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
175:12:57, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
161:12:57, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
271:
18:Talk:Louise Boursier
181:close paraphrasing
89:
88:
262:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
270:
269:
265:
264:
263:
261:
260:
259:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
268:
266:
258:
257:
213:WP:Peer review
205:
204:
200:
199:
194:
193:
189:
188:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
267:
256:
252:
248:
247:Doug Coldwell
242:
241:
240:
239:
235:
231:
230:Larry Hockett
226:
224:
219:
216:
214:
208:
202:
201:
196:
195:
191:
190:
186:
185:
184:
182:
177:
176:
172:
168:
167:Larry Hockett
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
147:Larry Hockett
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
244:or so -: -->
227:
220:
217:
209:
206:
178:
164:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
104:visual edit
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
223:WP:GAFAIL
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
157:contribs
76:Criteria
127:history
108:history
94:Article
136:Watch
16:<
251:talk
234:Talk
171:Talk
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
253:)
236:)
173:)
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
249:(
232:(
169:(
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.