95:
311:
290:
200:
321:
85:
64:
33:
190:
169:
624:- there seems to be some mindset here that stubs are bad, they are not. They are simply articles awaiting expansion, and in this case they are perfectly good articles. The table on the SE postcode area already looks terrible and overcrowded and should probably be removed ASAP in favour of these individual articles.
691:
centralising individual post code stubs creates a substantional article; and avoids duplication of basic information about post codes. Post codes are merely a comment on the organisation of postal delivery, they contain no substantive information about the administration of districts - nor should
823:
side of the river. But the only two buildings entered from the southern bridge approach, nos 1 and 2 London Bridge (which have SE1 addresses), are surely in the administrative
Borough of Southwark. Similarly, the northern halves of several other bridges are in the City, but in SE1!
773:
Does anyone know what is meant by "Sidcup (small parts for 2012)" in the area for SE9? With no reference for what this means, I am going to delete this. If you disagree, please state why - happy for it to be restored if it makes sense.
558:) has reverted these redirects, recreating the stub articles with edit summary "substantive content clearly verifiable". I would like to outline my rationale for undoing this action, and for redirecting these here:
709:
until a common guideline has been agreed for UK postcode districts articles either all to be merged into sections within the articles about their postcode area, or all to be kept (and named consistently). —
595:
Our coverage of postal administration should not be organised with articles of pseudo-localities based on postcode districts. It is unnecessary duplication of the locality articles.
602:
article already exists and contains all the information duplicated in these articles: District coverage, Local authorities, Maps, details of areas, streets and features.
674:
Redirecting to a centralised discussion, that encourages avoidance of a "one size fits all" policy is counter-intuitive and disrupts the individual merge discussions.
819:
Puzzles me as well. Is it perhaps London Bridge? - which is wholly in the City, including the south end?, while the postcode maps show the SE1 area extending to the
853:
141:
863:
530:
I've redirected these stubs here as they contain little substantive content that is not in this article. I'd be interested in any rationale for not doing that.
272:
262:
848:
873:
385:
375:
858:
878:
661:
151:
868:
833:
351:
781:
414:
94:
234:
230:
226:
213:
174:
117:
334:
295:
660:- Rather than have sparse discussions on these articles spread across Knowledge, I have suggested centralised discussion at
729:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
555:
108:
69:
44:
829:
785:
418:
606:
I cannot see any rationale for retaining these stubs and I propose to redirect them back to this article.
809:
218:
205:
50:
562:
These particular postcode districts, relating to suburban locations in London, are not, in themselves,
777:
715:
697:
637:
Can you detail what information would be detailed in these articles that is not already contained in
410:
825:
350:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
116:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
467:
238:
751:
549:
805:
638:
599:
475:
346:
326:
711:
693:
310:
289:
641:
article? We need a rationale for creating these articles and none has been put forward.
801:
759:
679:
646:
611:
535:
483:
434:
222:
842:
100:
573:
545:
84:
63:
225:
on
Knowledge. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can
581:
563:
519:
514:
509:
503:
498:
17:
747:
577:
569:
524:
316:
195:
90:
592:
etc. are all notable as localities and that is why we have articles for them.
755:
675:
664:
642:
625:
607:
531:
479:
430:
340:
813:
789:
763:
719:
701:
683:
669:
650:
630:
615:
539:
487:
438:
422:
407:
This needs explanation. It sounds impressive but doesn't convey meaning.
662:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject UK geography#Input requested: SE postcode area
585:
221:
dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the
589:
113:
189:
168:
26:
403:
districts are also split into two alphabetical tranches
459:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
338:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
112:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
466:The result was following centralised discussion,
462:A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
8:
284:
163:
58:
32:
30:
692:they - since it is an unrelated subject.
286:
211:This article falls within the scope of
165:
60:
854:Low-importance London-related articles
754:indicates some of SE18 was also used.
7:
864:Mid-importance UK geography articles
453:The following discussion is closed.
332:This article is within the scope of
106:This article is within the scope of
49:It is of interest to the following
849:List-Class London-related articles
247:Knowledge:WikiProject UK geography
25:
874:Low-importance Philately articles
250:Template:WikiProject UK geography
859:List-Class UK geography articles
744:calved out of existing districts
725:The discussion above is closed.
319:
309:
288:
198:
188:
167:
93:
83:
62:
31:
879:All WikiProject Philately pages
429:This is hopefully clearer now.
380:This article has been rated as
360:Knowledge:WikiProject Philately
267:This article has been rated as
146:This article has been rated as
800:Which parts of SE1 are in the
363:Template:WikiProject Philately
239:how to write about settlements
1:
869:List-Class Philately articles
354:and see a list of open tasks.
120:and see a list of open tasks.
834:11:48, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
738:I've changed the entry from
126:Knowledge:WikiProject London
227:join us at the project page
129:Template:WikiProject London
895:
814:08:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
790:20:26, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
764:12:26, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
720:15:21, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
702:13:03, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
684:12:15, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
670:12:08, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
651:12:05, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
631:11:49, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
616:11:11, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
540:08:04, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
488:04:29, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
439:19:01, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
386:project's importance scale
273:project's importance scale
152:project's importance scale
379:
304:
266:
183:
145:
78:
57:
727:Please do not modify it.
456:Please do not modify it.
423:13:45, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
214:WikiProject UK geography
132:London-related articles
39:This article is rated
335:WikiProject Philately
253:UK geography articles
206:United Kingdom portal
746:as a comparison of
366:Philately articles
237:and guidelines on
109:WikiProject London
45:content assessment
780:comment added by
740:calved out of SE2
413:comment added by
400:
399:
396:
395:
392:
391:
283:
282:
279:
278:
162:
161:
158:
157:
16:(Redirected from
886:
792:
667:
639:SE postcode area
628:
600:SE postcode area
476:SE postcode area
458:
425:
368:
367:
364:
361:
358:
347:stamp collecting
329:
327:Philately portal
324:
323:
322:
313:
306:
305:
300:
292:
285:
255:
254:
251:
248:
245:
229:where there are
208:
203:
202:
201:
192:
185:
184:
179:
171:
164:
134:
133:
130:
127:
124:
103:
98:
97:
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
42:
36:
35:
34:
27:
21:
18:Talk:London SE25
894:
893:
889:
888:
887:
885:
884:
883:
839:
838:
798:
775:
771:
736:
731:
730:
665:
626:
495:
454:
447:
408:
405:
365:
362:
359:
356:
355:
325:
320:
318:
298:
252:
249:
246:
243:
242:
204:
199:
197:
177:
131:
128:
125:
122:
121:
99:
92:
72:
43:on Knowledge's
40:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
892:
890:
882:
881:
876:
871:
866:
861:
856:
851:
841:
840:
837:
836:
802:City of London
797:
794:
770:
767:
735:
732:
724:
723:
722:
704:
686:
672:
654:
653:
634:
633:
604:
603:
596:
593:
567:
528:
527:
522:
517:
512:
507:
501:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
449:
448:
446:
443:
442:
441:
404:
401:
398:
397:
394:
393:
390:
389:
382:Low-importance
378:
372:
371:
369:
352:the discussion
331:
330:
314:
302:
301:
299:Low‑importance
293:
281:
280:
277:
276:
269:Mid-importance
265:
259:
258:
256:
223:United Kingdom
210:
209:
193:
181:
180:
178:Mid‑importance
172:
160:
159:
156:
155:
148:Low-importance
144:
138:
137:
135:
118:the discussion
105:
104:
88:
76:
75:
73:Low‑importance
67:
55:
54:
48:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
891:
880:
877:
875:
872:
870:
867:
865:
862:
860:
857:
855:
852:
850:
847:
846:
844:
835:
831:
827:
826:John O'London
822:
818:
817:
816:
815:
811:
807:
803:
795:
793:
791:
787:
783:
782:86.161.179.90
779:
768:
766:
765:
761:
757:
753:
749:
745:
741:
733:
728:
721:
717:
713:
708:
705:
703:
699:
695:
690:
689:Support merge
687:
685:
681:
677:
673:
671:
668:
663:
659:
656:
655:
652:
648:
644:
640:
636:
635:
632:
629:
623:
620:
619:
618:
617:
613:
609:
601:
597:
594:
591:
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
568:
565:
561:
560:
559:
557:
554:
551:
547:
542:
541:
537:
533:
526:
523:
521:
518:
516:
513:
511:
508:
505:
502:
500:
497:
496:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
470:was adopted,
469:
465:
464:
463:
460:
457:
451:
450:
444:
440:
436:
432:
428:
427:
426:
424:
420:
416:
415:81.140.57.113
412:
402:
387:
383:
377:
374:
373:
370:
353:
349:
348:
343:
342:
337:
336:
328:
317:
315:
312:
308:
307:
303:
297:
294:
291:
287:
274:
270:
264:
261:
260:
257:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
215:
207:
196:
194:
191:
187:
186:
182:
176:
173:
170:
166:
153:
149:
143:
140:
139:
136:
119:
115:
111:
110:
102:
101:London portal
96:
91:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
29:
28:
19:
820:
799:
776:— Preceding
772:
743:
739:
737:
726:
706:
688:
657:
622:Oppose merge
621:
605:
574:East Dulwich
552:
543:
529:
471:
461:
455:
452:
406:
381:
345:
339:
333:
268:
244:UK geography
212:
175:UK geography
147:
107:
51:WikiProjects
806:Crookesmoor
769:SE9 - What?
582:Rotherhithe
525:London SE6‎
520:London SE13
515:London SE16
510:London SE24
504:London SE22
499:London SE28
468:WP:UKPOSTAL
409:—Preceding
235:to do lists
843:Categories
712:Richardguk
694:Kbthompson
578:Herne Hill
570:Thamesmead
219:user-group
41:List-class
544:I notice
472:merge all
445:Redirects
357:Philately
341:philately
296:Philately
231:resources
778:unsigned
586:Lewisham
556:contribs
411:unsigned
590:Catford
564:notable
546:Rumping
384:on the
271:on the
150:on the
123:London
114:London
70:London
47:scale.
821:north
707:Defer
658:Note:
478:. --
474:into
830:talk
810:talk
786:talk
760:talk
756:MRSC
752:this
750:and
748:this
734:SE28
716:talk
698:talk
680:talk
676:MRSC
666:Jeni
647:talk
643:MRSC
627:Jeni
612:talk
608:MRSC
598:The
550:talk
536:talk
532:MRSC
484:talk
480:MRSC
435:talk
431:MRSC
419:talk
344:and
217:, a
796:SE1
742:to
376:Low
263:Mid
142:Low
845::
832:)
824:--
812:)
804:?
788:)
762:)
718:)
700:)
682:)
649:)
614:)
588:,
584:,
580:,
576:,
572:,
538:)
486:)
437:)
421:)
233:,
828:(
808:(
784:(
758:(
714:(
696:(
678:(
645:(
610:(
566:.
553:·
548:(
534:(
506:‎
482:(
433:(
417:(
388:.
275:.
241:.
154:.
53::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
