Talk:Looper (film)

1453:(Gordon-Levitt), the death of sarah by the old joe (willis from the future ) would logically create the rain maker. There are two possibilities from my point of view. a.) And to answer the question who, or how the rain maker was created originally (because it couldn't have been the joe from the future, as the first joe that got sent back was killed immediately) I would say it has to do with the 3 children born on the same date. And the storys about "rain maker" that differ (nobody knows how he really looks like) have to do, because, maybe sid never became the rain maker originalla but one of the other two childs that lost their mother by accident of a future looper that got killed latter on (its pretty sure that the escape of a future looper did happen more than twice). b.)Another theory I personally stick to is: Sid thought his mother (in fact that was his aunt) got killed by some guy with a gun. Sarah however tells it was an accident, and she is his real mother. However, in the Future A (where the rain maker cannot lose his mother because of joe, because joe is killed by his younger version) sarah never gave him the feeling being HIS MOTHER! So he still thought he lost his mother. But before Future B comes to life(the future resulting from the end of the movie) he knows because Sarah said to him to calm down and she also adds that she is his mother, when he used telekinesis to defend Sarah from the old joe, that she REALLY IS HIS MOTHER. And as young joe now kills himself, Sid now knows he has a living mother (not like in future A were he lost his aunt but never believed in his real mother).-- 1261:

The mafia must therefore bring in the renagade Seth from the future, and does this by capturing Young Seth and carving a message into his arm that his older self sees as a scar. The message instructs Old Seth to present himself at a certain address within 15 minutes. When Old Seth fails to comply with the dictum, the crime organization has its "doctor" cut off body parts from young Seth's body. As Old Seth begins losing fingers, his nose, and them portions of his arms and legs, he crawls to the door of the location that had been carved on his arm by the mafia, and is shot in the head.

1396:

of nerfer's wording my be more helpful than our current phrasing. I mean for me, much like you, the plot wasn't really all that complicated. But you and I have crossed paths on many film articles and we both know that time travel plots and twisty plots can often lead to debate amongst other film watchers. It seems like when we've been able to pin down specifics clearly we've gotten fewer edit conflicts down the line. /I'm about to watch the film again and jot some notes first, though. There's some stuff I'm remembering that I think may be my own subjective take on things.

1112:

think we could probably shoot for between 700-800 and I plan on grabbing the version Darkwarrior reverted and playing with it in my sandbox to see if I can keep some of the core content you'd added but trim up the wordiness a bit. I'll drop a note here when it's ready to go and see what others think. A lot of this film is going to be a bit subject to viewer interpretation (and you were really close to neutral but I spotted a bit or two I could work on) so I think we cut bulk from that longer version that way. Hopefully, I'll have something later on tonight.

627: 407: 1411:

events originally played out, e.g. there is no reason to believe that Cid did not have a mother in the original timeline and since Old Joe cannot have been in the original timeline and Young Joe never interacted with Cid in the original timeline, it is impossible to know what created the Rainmaker. Kid could just be a douche. Like I said, you can feel free to edit, but I don't think most of that stuff should ho back in, definitely not as it was, and definitely not the huge chunk about Seth's torture.

147: 308: 280: 617: 599: 1089:

watch the movie, and I wasn't offering a commentary or interpretation. Regarding the series of events that originally created the Rainmaker, we just don't know. But with the Old Joe and Young Joe interfering with Cid's life, and Cid & Sarah having the breakthrough moment in his control, it's obvious the future has changed. Also, the gold/silver bars probably won't hurt Sarah's life either. (A little glitch there - when did they change from silver to gold?).

318: 196: 175: 1504:

a trap and is captured by Kid Blue.". Conveying the same point in three times the amount of text. This continues despite clear edit summaries explaining why their edits, including Tiller54's, were removed. I'm unwatching the article because editors can't be bothered to participate to follow the same guidelines every other film article falls under and are ignoring the clearly laid out edit summaries. Someone else can deal with it.

443: 505: 487: 455: 515: 77: 53: 1057:. We report what was shown onscreen and nothing else, unless a source from the writer or director makes a definitive statement. Then we can clarify in the plot section with an inline citation. If nothing like that is available, then we can (once there are sources discussing it) include the aforementioned interpretation section with the various veiwpoints covered by reliable sources. 206: 419: 87: 22: 1888:

Before the dispute, there were no cast surnames in the plot. Nobody suggested reverting back to the style of the first, earliest edit of plot content. (Betty, please correct me if I have misunderstood you.) Also, after someone has read the plot, it does not seem like they would have to scroll very

1503:

People keep adding fluff details to the plot like and generally ignoring the plot limit rule for the most minor of details such as turning " Meanwhile, Old Joe is captured by Kid Blue." into "Meanwhile, Old Joe has killed one of the children and arrives at Suzie's house to kill her son but walks into

1452:

But I think there is an answer for the question "who created the original rain maker(from the future old joe comes from)that gave the order to close all the loopers,although sid couldn't have lost his mother if old joe is killed in the first place(in bruce willis life) ? In the time-line of young joe

1434:

Oh I pretty much agree on all points; but the second people can interpret some kind of paradox or alternate interpretation of events (think Shutter Island and Inception) our edit conflicts on film plots goes up exponentially, regardless of how clear it may seem to me. SO I want to poke at it. I may

1270:

This is basically just reciting a scene in its entirety that does not further the plot. In the opening paragraph it is established that failing a contrract is a death sentence for the Looper and that a Looper will be presented with their older selves at some point. So saying that Seth failed to do it

1260:

a ruthless mastermind who has taken over future organized crime and is closing all loops. Joe attempts to protect Seth, but later chooses to betray him to Abe instead of surrendering half of his silver savings. Because the older Seth is affecting the events in 2044, his own past is changing as well.

1170:

Thanks, I'll poke at those while I'm writing/tweaking. I don't work on plot summaries needing outside sources very often. Do any more experienced editors know if it will be ok to use either of those as refs for any definitive points? I should think the collider link with Johnson's commentary track

1088:

I tried expanding the plot to explain some of these details, but apparently others disagreed with this and undid my changes. I think people come to Knowledge and read the plot to figure out what was going on, as this was a confusing film to many people. You don't read the plot to see if you want to

955:

I deleted the last paragraph of the plot summary since it simply didn't happen. There is no mystery about "Who's the Rainmaker" given that (1) Joe doesn't have TK, (2) Old Joe was kidnapped by the Rainmaker's henchmen, (3) the Rainmaker's birthdate most certainly means it's not Joe, and (4) Young Joe

2117:

The sequence of events depicted by these sentences ("...Some time later he meets a woman during a bar fight; the two fall in love and marry. Thirty years later Joe is taken...") is not just ambiguous but positively misleading. Old Joe didn't meet his wife "some time" later, he met her 23 years after

2073:

It is a plot hole, in the sense that they shoot the older seth when he appears....... but it also means that the younger seth... (with no nose, legs, missing fingers etc) will still end up dying (and being useless to the syndicate) anyway..... Would have made more sense to just have a scar that said

2001:

Re the edit war which has been going on about this, the anon has been trying to insert a comment about the child character being "shot in the face." I just looked at the scene at issue in a copy of the film. A brief segment at 1h58m48s and a longer one at 1h44m55s to 1h45m00s in the copy I looked at

1806:

We could go back and forth like that till doomsday. Won't get us any closer to a consensus. At the end of the day, there is no right or wrong way to do it. I think generally it's down to the individual editors writing the pages. If it's not hurting staying there, then there isn't a need to change it

1368:

It's all redundant and excessive detail and my removal of the content was IMO, completely justified. Now that doesn't mean Milahanna cannot edit it, what I am advocating is that the content that was removed was redundant then no matter how it was written, and shouldn't be added back in, in any form.

1319:

Another unnecessary point, the final paragraph states that Joe realizes Old Joe is going to end up creating the Rainmaker. Ill thought out time travel aside, Old Joe didn't come back originally or he'd remember having to fight himself in the past, so whatever makes the Rainmaker happens anyway. It's

1111:

says we should shoot for about 700 words tops and we were at just over 900 after your's and an anon editor's collective work. Now the guideline also notes that there will sometimes be exceptions for complicated films, and in my experience time travel flicks often turn out to be those exceptions. I

1030:

It's important for clarity so people don't incorrectly believe that this series of events had occurred in Old Joe's timeline to create the Rainmaker. There is a large amount of contention surrounding the cause and effect of this film, and to ignore it, even if just to enjoy the story, you're missing

1008:

Deleted a comment from the plot summary that stated "even though Old Joe's timeline had the same Rainmaker outcome without his interference." Seemed unnecessary to point out that particular plot hole. It's also debatable that it was even a plot hole - I felt the film suggested what was happening was

2096:

Abe did say that they didn't want to just kill Seth because of concern about the potential ripple effects on the timeline. He also acknowledged that even what they were planning (which turned out to be the mutilation) would be risky in that regard. But he said (without elaborating on exactly why)

1827:

Some people like them some people don't, and there are many articles that utilise this approach and many that don't. The MOS permits parenthesised cast names, but doesn't compel it. It's a personal preference thing, and the problem with that is that there is no good reason why one editor's personal

1395:

I actually agree with you on most of this (regarding redundancy) but there were one or two small things that I remember reading and thinking I could sort of hybridize into the current plot, if that makes any sense. Basically there was some stuff I spotted where I thought that a slimmed down version

2021:

Even if we do include the plot point about the child being shot in the face, saying he was "shot in the face" doesn't sound right and we don't need to put every place someone gets shot (does that make sense?). It has turned into disruptive editing on the annons part even if he did have a justified

1869:

includes the surnames of the actors after their character names. Is everyone happy to keep it as it is then with the surnames of the main characters? I mean to be honest, I am going by my personal views on it that it makes the article easier to read and saves scrolling a mile to find out who's who

1646:

The second child is not named in the text of the film... Joe's going to give Suzie half his silver to "raise her kid right". Old Joe says that no one is even sure if the Rainmaker is a man or a woman (diner conversation). When Suzie picks her child up from the neighbor, it's clearly a girl (long

1566:

It's edit warring if repeated reverts are made over the same content by the same users in a short period of time without discussion. I don't think this is edit warring, but there are guidelines that hte user(s) are ignoring. And they've ignored the edit summaries explaining why to restore the same

1300:

that will spare his life, it isn't the case and referring to the previous point, we know that failure is a death sentence so him wanting to kill Joe doesn't need further elaboration, its just repeating the point. Then the arm thing, same over elaboration, they meet in a diner, who cares if he text

2051:

by carving a message into young Seth arm that his older self sees as a scar - is very attractive, unfortunately there is no need for that, because if young Seth would be killed instead instantly, the old Seth would disappear immediately :) You can argue that the syndicate probably needed form the

1052:

I think, in the long run, we may have to go the route of Inception with this one and source a few minor aspects of the plot or include an interpretation section elsewhere, once there are sources discussing it. If it's viewer interpretation (and the fact that there is debate about the sequence of

1567:

superfluous content without explanation, which is ignorant if nothing else, because they had to check the edit summaries to find out why the content they had added was gone. I'm worn out fighting over article content so I'm leaving it to others to deal with, just wanted to respond to your query.

1410:

I don't think the time travel part is actually that big a part of the film, its a linear story, the only time travel part is his older self coming back and the brief look at the original timeline we get of him in Hong Kong. Nothing is really presented in the film to offer any explanation for how

1364:

Same problem again, overstating and original research. Cid could get adopted for all we know so we can't say he grows up motherless or STILL grows up motherless because we don't know how he originally grew up. "Continuous" in "time loop" is redundant, the whole stuff about explaining his weapon?

2118:

closing his loop. The next sentence "Thirty years later..." would imply the passage of 53 years, not 30. While my original edit might have been a bit wordy (because I tied in Rainmaker's rise to power), the point stands and I've made a smaller edit for the sake of factual accuracy and clarity.

1205:

I'd say that since Johnson is the writer and director of the film, pretty much anything he says anywhere about the film's plot could be used as refs for any definitive points. The infographic, however, might be better for a "Film structure" section that could be developed (I'm thinking about

1435:

not come up with anything I like better than what's here but this sort of thing is basically my favorite part of working on wiki so I'll give it a go. I'll do everything in my sandbox and link to it here for folks to look at so as not to bump into anyone else's trimming/expansion efforts.

1449:@ Darkwarriorblake I watched the movie recently and looked up the internet regarding why the rainmaker ever could exist. In the life time line of the old joe(Bruce Willis) from the future he killed his future version that got sent back , so there was no possibilty to create the rain maker. 1828:

preference should win out over somebody else's, so my suggestion is to stick with what you had before the dispute. The existing format should be retained unless it either violates the MOS (which neither format does here) or there is a clear consensus to alter the casting format in use.

1986:

We do not need to warn people about the shooting of children in the lede of article as a "trigger warning" in connection to the event at Sandy Hook. Such connection is not encyclopedic. In reading the plot and the reception, this detail is brought to the attention of the reader.

2165:

That does seem odd. The same user previously added something about the Rainmaker being "jawless" - I don't remember that from the movie. Maybe I missed it... I've removed it all for now. Even if it's legitimate and someone adds it back, it could stand to be phrased much better.

1951:

Moreovr. If Old Joe disapperas, that means the truck he drived should disappear and no silver bars should be present on teh road to make the happy end. And actually Yong Joe should disappear since he wuld be in some other place by that time not chasing Old

1719:

I only included them because in pretty much all film articles I have read has had them in during the plot for ease of reading and being able to put a character name to a face making, in my opinion ease of reading. But I will happily go with the consensus.

2211:"Cid falls down the stairs and becomes upset, triggering an enormous telekinetic blast that kills Jesse, revealing that Cid is a powerful telekinetic and the future Rainmaker." - This seems pretty clear to me. I'll defer to other editors on point 2. 701:

That's just the way I've always seen it. The article doesn't help as the title doesn't have the dash but the contents use science-fiction 12 times. From my knowledge of grammar that seems the most sensible way for it to be but I may be wrong.

2195:

2. The article is PR-hyped. I took out "acclaimed": most liked it some didn't. More importantly, isn't the Critics' section hugely looong, as compared to other film pages I have read. I don't want to cut it by 80% unless there is consensus.

1956:

Actually, that isnt a plot hole because the criminal syndicates were using loopers before the Rainmaker came along. But this isnt a forum for general discussion on the film and its plot holes. Please go to various movie forums for that.

2139:

From the plot section: "the bullet grazing his cheek - this infection will later lead to jaw amputation as Cid matures." What? Nothing of the sort is said or even alluded to in the film! Kumagoro-42 15:42, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

1905:

If they do go in the plot I don't think they need linking, they are mostly linked above, to the right (the infobox) and directly below. Non eed for 4 links in the immediate opening of the article to the same actors.

1271:

and that Joe betrayed him covers the events of this very briefly. Describing what is done to seth is just replicating a scene people thought was cool, but it isn't important to the overall understanding of the plot.

1928:

If there's no Rainmaker, there's no criminal syndicate that uses time machines to send people back to get killed, so Joe probably isn't a contract killer and doesn't kill himself, neither does he go back in time.

1281:

Young Joe knows he needs to kill his future self if he wants to live another 30 years, and is desperate to do this before the mafia kills them both. He sends a message to his future self much like Seth's arm.

1009:

a predestination paradox. Whether it was or not is up for debate, but I think its enough of a question to remove the "even though Old Joe's timeline had the same Rainmaker..." bit from the plot summary..

1585:

I notice has reverted the same edit twice, I dropped a line explaining the reason why his edit had been reverted, and then he did it again an hour later so I gave him the friendly edit warring notice.

1542:

I noticed that the same editor has undone the same edit twice now, so I sent him a friendly edit warring notice on his talk page. This is in addition to the message I sent him earlier this evening.

2634: 2584: 1518:

I know what you mean. Is it still considered edit warring if several editors undo the trivial details repeatedly? Iv been reluctant to undo them for fear of being caught in an edit war.

816:

I can't find any information elsewhere that supports this film being based on a Philip K Dick story, and I don't think there even is a story by him of the name "The Loop And Loom".

348: 2074:

something like 'time for you to disappear' or suchlike..... Cut to a shot of Seth then being killed.... Then back to older Seth vanishing at the fence next to the railway.......

432: 290: 156: 63: 1284:

After meeting in a diner, Old Joe tells Joe that the Rainmaker sent him back to be killed, and that Old Joe's wife was killed during his capture. Old Joe killed his captors and

2589: 1365:

Pointless and original research because it is saying if he had, had a sniper rifle he'd have killed Old Joe instead. Point is he made a sacrifice for something he believed in.

2629: 2579: 1763: 739:

The most common usages I've seen are as "science fiction" (unhypenated), but the shorter form ("sci-fi") hypenated, but Merriam-Webster shows the noun form as unhypenated

673: 391: 365: 2564: 262: 252: 2599: 2477: 2473: 2459: 2367: 2363: 2349: 397: 2619: 2569: 575: 2549: 717:

I've seen the dash before but I thought that it was a less common variation. I'll try to see if there's a reason for using it, maybe in certain situations.

2609: 355: 977:

I too have been trying to fix some of the errors. It might be better just to rewrite it at this point. So many things are out of order chronologically. --

1691: 228: 2235:

i recently returned the DVD to the library, but didn't one of the bonus features interviews say the film was created with Joseph Gordon-Levitt in mind?

1486:), it is an acceptable length because it is a time travel narrative and may be considered unconventional in structure or more complicated than average. 1849:. It elminated the redundancy, but also eliminated the need to scroll down to see who was playing the part. You might be able to do something similar. 2559: 2544: 581: 360: 2624: 2604: 2574: 679: 219: 180: 2098: 2081: 1755: 1038: 956:

says that he was sold to pan-handlers by his junkie mother. I'm not sure why the person who wrote the plot summary was confused by this.

2639: 2594: 2257: 2059: 823: 551: 331: 285: 2614: 2554: 1936: 1759: 1747: 1016: 844: 343: 2455:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

2345:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

2156: 1807:

for the main characters. However, listing EVERY minor character thats too far and should not happen as it would take up word counts.

963: 914: 885: 1690:

The fact is, some articles have them and some do not. There has been discussion about having cast names in a film's plot summary (

649: 1320:

arguable that Young Joe's interference because of Old Joe's return makes Cidinto a better person, but that is original research.

2246:, & if so, is that worth noting in the article? Heck, even if it's a coincidence, maybe it should be mentioned. Not like 468: 294: 105: 2539: 1647:

hair, flower-speckled stretch pants). Watching it in slow motion right now. Three possible Rainmakers, two boys, one girl.

547: 528: 492: 339:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

2052:

young and older Seth some services later, but then the young Seth could not by mutilated, nor murdered by the doctor ...

117: 109: 1482:

tag because even though the plot summary is currently about 730 words (about 30 words longer than the normal maximum per

2520: 2410: 2335: 33: 2445: 2325: 2315: 640: 604: 1142:, but, as Johnson himself said, "this is NOT to be listened to on a first viewing, or before you've seen the film". 2125: 1911: 1682:) because I feel that they would be redundant, given that this article has a "Cast" section. He undid my removal ( 1572: 1509: 1416: 1374: 777: 726: 707: 648:

related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

211: 113: 100: 58: 2476:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2366:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

1251:

I disagree that the plot is complex and its downright not thought out at all in places. The additions made were:

2247: 1702:. It seems to me like this issue is to be dealt with on a case-by-case basis. Thoughts on this case, please. 941:

It may not warrant a re write but there's an error in about every other paragraph. I'll correct the ones I see

2102: 2085: 1107:

I saw your edit and appreciated the concept but shared Darkwarriorblake's concern that it was a little long.

1042: 2261: 2063: 827: 2511: 2437: 2401: 2307: 1993: 1940: 1751: 1020: 848: 1870:

after I have read the plot if that makes sense? I am happy to go with the consensus. Whatever that may be.

967: 918: 889: 2433: 2031: 1966: 1875: 1812: 1775: 1725: 1699: 1671: 1636: 1595: 1551: 1527: 1077: 865: 2495:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2483: 2385:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2373: 2152: 2121: 1907: 1896: 1854: 1846:

As aside, Gothicfilm and I had a very similar disagreement, and this was one of the proposed solutions:

1833: 1789: 1709: 1568: 1505: 1493: 1458: 1412: 1370: 1228: 1149: 1072:

Agreed.It's not the place of Knowledge pages to identify plot holes/discrepancies. They are for forums.

703: 533: 39: 2436:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2306:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1850: 1829: 1454: 2201: 2144: 2077: 2055: 2006: 1932: 1034: 1012: 959: 819: 323: 21: 1440: 1401: 1180: 1139: 1117: 1062: 747: 406: 146: 1346:, which doesn't have the accuracy to kill Old Joe at that distance. So Joe instead kills himself, 928: 546:. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the 227:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

2171: 1989: 1483: 1108: 978: 900: 802: 2480:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2370:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

1648: 307: 279: 2496: 2386: 2280: 2216: 2024: 1959: 1871: 1865:

Going on your idea of before the dispute Betty, the first edit of the plot (that I could see)

1808: 1767: 1721: 1667: 1632: 1588: 1544: 1520: 1073: 932: 858: 740: 616: 598: 2148: 1891: 1784: 1704: 1488: 1223: 1144: 1094: 982: 946: 904: 460: 2503: 2393: 2271:

I can't speak to the first point, but as to the second, it shouldn't be mentioned unless a

899:

I completely agree, but that's a discussion for the IMDB forums, not the Knowledge article.

2197: 2003: 1739: 1652: 837:

His bibliography here makes no mention of it and it isn't in the list of short stories at

520: 224: 927:

Did you mean on Knowledge, you don't think the film makes sense and it needs re-writing?

2192:

1. Is Abe the Rainmaker? Plot summary is not clear (and I only saw the last 20 minutes)

1976: 1944: 1627:

Suzie's child was referred to as a "boy" in the film. That is more telling than a name.

2462:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2352:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1436: 1397: 1207: 1176: 1113: 1058: 773: 743: 722: 2502:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2392:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2533: 2429: 2336:

http://www.webcitation.org/6FaZ1wnUQ?url=http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms34.html

2299: 2239: 2167: 1771: 1624:

Editors seem to disagree. The child's name is Megan. I think that means it's a girl.

1582: 1476: 798: 336: 2446:

https://web.archive.org/web/20131221034244/http://floridafilmcriticscircle.webs.com/

195: 174: 2326:

http://www.webcitation.org/6CrNMCA0g?url=http://www.criticschoice.com/movie-awards/

2316:

http://www.webcitation.org/6CrNMCA0g?url=http://www.criticschoice.com/movie-awards/

2276: 2272: 2212: 1172: 1054: 793: 742:, and the adjective form hyphenated (as it should be, being a compound adjective). 632: 791:

Evidently, the poster they have on the article is fake. If you look at one of the

104:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can 2469: 2449: 2359: 1743: 1343: 1135: 1090: 942: 838: 442: 424: 92: 2339: 1310:

Sara argues that with proper parenting, Cid will not use his powers for evil.

504: 486: 2468:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2358:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1688:

Main Cast names in plot are a part of most if not all film pages on wikipedia.

1674:) added and wikilinked the surnames of select characters in the plot summary ( 1656: 1640: 622: 537: 510: 450: 414: 313: 201: 82: 76: 52: 2329: 2319: 797:

posters, you can see that they resemble the inner text. Can this be deleted?

1218: 769: 718: 335:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 205: 2243: 2228: 1695: 542: 121: 1053:

events means that it is), we can't include it in the plot. It would be

843:

Googling "The Loop and Loom" as a phrase only comes up with a few hits.

2525: 2415: 2284: 2265: 2220: 2205: 2175: 2129: 2106: 2089: 2067: 2041: 2016: 1996: 1915: 1900: 1879: 1858: 1837: 1816: 1793: 1778:, or any of the 22 James Bond film articles (excluding the unreleased 1729: 1713: 1605: 1576: 1561: 1537: 1513: 1497: 1462: 1444: 1420: 1405: 1378: 1232: 1184: 1153: 1121: 1098: 1081: 1066: 1046: 1024: 986: 971: 950: 936: 922: 908: 893: 884:

Anyone else besides be feel like this plot makes absolutely no sense?

874: 852: 831: 806: 781: 751: 730: 711: 2186:

I'm new to this Talk, but just saw the movie, and read the article.

2002:

clearly depict the bullet as having grazed the child's right cheek.

1031:

very important details people visit Knowledge to find lucidity to.

2189:

I have 2 issues which veteran Talk editors of Looper can address.

1889:

far to get to the cast list—the very next section in the article.

645: 2231:? & was Looper created specifically for Joseph Gordon-Levitt? 1171:

wouldn't be an issue but I'm not sure how Film.com rates on the

1214: 15: 441: 405: 145: 2440:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

2310:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1140:

Rian Johnson has recorded an audio commentary for the film

550:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 2097:

that it was less risky than just killing him altogether.

857:

Has anyone managed to find any more information on this?

1210:), and Johnson's commentary could be used there as well. 2303: 1866: 1847: 1692:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Film/Archive 43#Cast in plot

1683: 1679: 1675: 1631:

Was Susie's child named...? I dont recall that part.

1221:, among other sites, so I think it's alright to use. 2635:

C-Class China-related articles of Unknown-importance

2585:

C-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance

644:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 223:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2472:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2362:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1764:Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull 678:This article has not yet received a rating on the 580:This article has not yet received a rating on the 396:This article has not yet received a rating on the 1286:to prevent his wife from being killed in 2074, he 1332:and it will lead to Cid becoming the Rainmaker 120:. To improve this article, please refer to the 2458:This message was posted before February 2018. 2348:This message was posted before February 2018. 2450:http://www.floridafilmcriticscircle.webs.com/ 1354:and leaving Cid's future open to other paths. 1330:Cid will still escape but grow up motherless, 839:http://www.philipkdick.com/works_stories.html 433:WikiProject Film - American cinema task force 8: 2340:http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms34.html 2590:Unknown-importance American cinema articles 1136:this infographic and commentary on the plot 2428:I have just modified one external link on 2330:http://www.criticschoice.com/movie-awards/ 2320:http://www.criticschoice.com/movie-awards/ 1217:and is partnered with MTV Movies Blog and 593: 481: 274: 169: 116:. To use this banner, please refer to the 47: 2630:Unknown-importance China-related articles 2580:Unknown-importance United States articles 2298:I have just modified 3 external links on 2565:Mid-importance science fiction articles 595: 483: 276: 171: 49: 19: 2600:Unknown-importance Louisiana articles 237:Knowledge:WikiProject Science Fiction 7: 2620:Unknown-importance Missouri articles 2570:WikiProject Science Fiction articles 1756:Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom 638:This article is within the scope of 329:This article is within the scope of 240:Template:WikiProject Science Fiction 217:This article is within the scope of 98:This article is within the scope of 2550:American cinema task force articles 768:will yield some references to use. 766:looper "rian johnson" site:nola.com 376:Knowledge:WikiProject United States 38:It is of interest to the following 2610:WikiProject United States articles 1760:Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade 1748:Captain America: The First Avenger 379:Template:WikiProject United States 14: 2432:. Please take a moment to review 2302:. Please take a moment to review 1698:'s guideline on cast information 1213:As far as Film.com is concerned, 154:This article is supported by the 2560:C-Class science fiction articles 2545:C-Class American cinema articles 1662:Cast members in the plot summary 625: 615: 597: 513: 503: 485: 453: 417: 316: 306: 278: 204: 194: 173: 114:regional and topical task forces 85: 75: 51: 20: 2047:The time-passing message scene 1923: 1348:erasing Old Joe from existence 257:This article has been rated as 2625:C-Class China-related articles 2605:WikiProject Louisiana articles 2575:C-Class United States articles 987:09:43, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 972:21:07, 29 September 2012 (UTC) 951:23:19, 28 September 2012 (UTC) 937:23:12, 28 September 2012 (UTC) 923:22:47, 28 September 2012 (UTC) 909:18:41, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 752:15:24, 29 September 2012 (UTC) 560:Knowledge:WikiProject Missouri 1: 2042:00:51, 23 December 2012 (UTC) 2017:02:21, 22 December 2012 (UTC) 1997:00:34, 22 December 2012 (UTC) 1581:Well, one user in particular 894:07:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 853:22:05, 3 September 2012 (UTC) 652:and see a list of open tasks. 563:Template:WikiProject Missouri 466:This article is supported by 430:This article is supported by 231:and see a list of open tasks. 2182:Too much hype in the article 2130:06:42, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 1977:18:17, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 1945:17:13, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 1916:00:54, 19 October 2012 (UTC) 1901:00:52, 19 October 2012 (UTC) 1880:23:43, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 1859:23:28, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 1838:23:22, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 1817:23:01, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 1794:22:28, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 1730:22:01, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 1714:21:46, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 1657:05:48, 11 January 2013 (UTC) 1641:23:02, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 1606:00:05, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 1577:23:50, 19 October 2012 (UTC) 1562:23:25, 19 October 2012 (UTC) 1538:23:13, 19 October 2012 (UTC) 1514:22:50, 19 October 2012 (UTC) 1498:01:58, 14 October 2012 (UTC) 1463:02:41, 12 October 2012 (UTC) 875:21:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC) 807:03:45, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 2526:02:18, 6 January 2018 (UTC) 2285:12:55, 18 August 2015 (UTC) 2266:23:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC) 1700:was recently under revision 1445:03:45, 8 October 2012 (UTC) 1421:03:27, 8 October 2012 (UTC) 1406:03:20, 8 October 2012 (UTC) 1379:03:11, 8 October 2012 (UTC) 1233:03:38, 8 October 2012 (UTC) 1185:03:20, 8 October 2012 (UTC) 1154:03:06, 8 October 2012 (UTC) 1122:02:56, 8 October 2012 (UTC) 1099:02:04, 8 October 2012 (UTC) 1082:22:13, 2 October 2012 (UTC) 1067:03:09, 2 October 2012 (UTC) 1047:02:09, 2 October 2012 (UTC) 1025:07:41, 1 October 2012 (UTC) 832:08:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC) 658:Knowledge:WikiProject China 220:WikiProject Science Fiction 2656: 2640:WikiProject China articles 2595:C-Class Louisiana articles 2489:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2425:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2379:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2295:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2176:16:07, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 2090:00:03, 12 March 2013 (UTC) 2068:10:27, 10 March 2013 (UTC) 2022:reason for putting it in. 1686:), with the edit summary: 680:project's importance scale 661:Template:WikiProject China 582:project's importance scale 398:project's importance scale 263:project's importance scale 212:Speculative fiction portal 157:American cinema task force 130:Knowledge:WikiProject Film 2615:C-Class Missouri articles 2555:WikiProject Film articles 2248:Kid Blue (disambiguation) 2221:14:40, 22 June 2015 (UTC) 2206:22:42, 21 June 2015 (UTC) 1296:This part is untrue, Joe 1215:it has an editorial staff 782:19:06, 10 June 2011 (UTC) 731:18:57, 10 June 2011 (UTC) 712:18:55, 10 June 2011 (UTC) 677: 610: 579: 498: 449: 413: 395: 332:WikiProject United States 301: 256: 189: 153: 133:Template:WikiProject Film 70: 46: 2416:20:41, 25 May 2017 (UTC) 2107:07:19, 20 May 2013 (UTC) 1350:from that point forward, 1134:Might want to check out 526:This article is part of 337:United States of America 243:science fiction articles 2421:External links modified 2291:External links modified 2227:should article mention 1752:Raiders of the Lost Ark 1620:Gender of Suzie's child 1468:Arbitrary section break 1334:who sends Old Joe back, 1982:Child shooting warning 1924:Here's a real plothole 1776:The Dark Knight (film) 1357: 1312: 1289: 1263: 664:China-related articles 446: 410: 382:United States articles 150: 28:This article is rated 2540:C-Class film articles 1619: 1352:saving Sara and Cid, 1327: 1308: 1278: 1258: 469:WikiProject Louisiana 445: 409: 149: 2470:regular verification 2360:regular verification 1678:). I removed them ( 529:WikiProject Missouri 324:United States portal 2460:After February 2018 2350:After February 2018 2250:, but something... 350:Articles Requested! 106:join the discussion 2514:InternetArchiveBot 2465:InternetArchiveBot 2404:InternetArchiveBot 2355:InternetArchiveBot 2275:has mentioned it. 2113:Thirty years later 447: 411: 151: 34:content assessment 2490: 2380: 2161: 2147:comment added by 2080:comment added by 2058:comment added by 2015: 1992: 1935:comment added by 1768:Prometheus (film) 1472:I've removed the 1342:Joe only has his 1037:comment added by 1015:comment added by 962:comment added by 822:comment added by 694: 693: 690: 689: 686: 685: 641:WikiProject China 592: 591: 588: 587: 566:Missouri articles 480: 479: 476: 475: 273: 272: 269: 268: 168: 167: 164: 163: 108:and see lists of 2647: 2524: 2515: 2488: 2487: 2466: 2414: 2405: 2378: 2377: 2356: 2160: 2141: 2122:Iyentra Rasonica 2092: 2070: 2040: 2038: 2029: 2009: 1988: 1975: 1972: 1964: 1947: 1908:Darkwarriorblake 1899: 1792: 1712: 1604: 1601: 1593: 1569:Darkwarriorblake 1560: 1557: 1549: 1536: 1533: 1525: 1506:Darkwarriorblake 1496: 1481: 1475: 1413:Darkwarriorblake 1371:Darkwarriorblake 1336:thus creating a 1231: 1152: 1049: 1027: 974: 871: 863: 834: 704:Darkwarriorblake 666: 665: 662: 659: 656: 635: 630: 629: 628: 619: 612: 611: 601: 594: 568: 567: 564: 561: 558: 523: 518: 517: 516: 507: 500: 499: 489: 482: 463: 461:Louisiana portal 458: 457: 456: 427: 422: 421: 420: 384: 383: 380: 377: 374: 326: 321: 320: 319: 310: 303: 302: 297: 282: 275: 245: 244: 241: 238: 235: 214: 209: 208: 198: 191: 190: 185: 177: 170: 138: 137: 134: 131: 128: 101:WikiProject Film 95: 90: 89: 88: 79: 72: 71: 66: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 2655: 2654: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2530: 2529: 2518: 2513: 2481: 2474:have permission 2464: 2438:this simple FaQ 2423: 2408: 2403: 2371: 2364:have permission 2354: 2308:this simple FaQ 2293: 2273:reliable source 2233: 2184: 2142: 2137: 2135:Jaw amputation? 2115: 2075: 2053: 2049: 2036: 2032: 2025: 2023: 1984: 1968: 1960: 1958: 1930: 1926: 1890: 1783: 1740:Iron Man (film) 1703: 1664: 1622: 1597: 1589: 1587: 1553: 1545: 1543: 1529: 1521: 1519: 1487: 1479: 1473: 1470: 1222: 1143: 1032: 1010: 1006: 957: 882: 867: 859: 817: 814: 789: 762: 699: 697:Science-fiction 663: 660: 657: 654: 653: 631: 626: 624: 565: 562: 559: 556: 555: 536:related to the 521:Missouri portal 519: 514: 512: 459: 454: 452: 423: 418: 416: 381: 378: 375: 372: 371: 370: 356:Become a Member 322: 317: 315: 288: 242: 239: 236: 234:Science Fiction 233: 232: 225:science fiction 210: 203: 183: 181:Science Fiction 135: 132: 129: 126: 125: 91: 86: 84: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 2653: 2651: 2643: 2642: 2637: 2632: 2627: 2622: 2617: 2612: 2607: 2602: 2597: 2592: 2587: 2582: 2577: 2572: 2567: 2562: 2557: 2552: 2547: 2542: 2532: 2531: 2508: 2507: 2500: 2453: 2452: 2444:Added archive 2422: 2419: 2398: 2397: 2390: 2343: 2342: 2334:Added archive 2332: 2324:Added archive 2322: 2314:Added archive 2292: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2232: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2183: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2136: 2133: 2114: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2099:76.169.121.177 2082:176.248.19.154 2048: 2045: 2034: 1983: 1980: 1954: 1953: 1925: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1903: 1883: 1882: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1841: 1840: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1733: 1732: 1663: 1660: 1644: 1643: 1621: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1469: 1466: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1366: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1211: 1208:Memento (film) 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1102: 1101: 1085: 1084: 1039:65.130.112.241 1005: 1002: 1000: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 911: 881: 878: 813: 810: 788: 785: 761: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 734: 733: 698: 695: 692: 691: 688: 687: 684: 683: 676: 670: 669: 667: 650:the discussion 637: 636: 620: 608: 607: 602: 590: 589: 586: 585: 578: 572: 571: 569: 525: 524: 508: 496: 495: 490: 478: 477: 474: 473: 465: 464: 448: 438: 437: 429: 428: 412: 402: 401: 394: 388: 387: 385: 369: 368: 363: 358: 353: 346: 344:Template Usage 340: 328: 327: 311: 299: 298: 283: 271: 270: 267: 266: 259:Mid-importance 255: 249: 248: 246: 229:the discussion 216: 215: 199: 187: 186: 184:Mid‑importance 178: 166: 165: 162: 161: 152: 142: 141: 139: 97: 96: 80: 68: 67: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2652: 2641: 2638: 2636: 2633: 2631: 2628: 2626: 2623: 2621: 2618: 2616: 2613: 2611: 2608: 2606: 2603: 2601: 2598: 2596: 2593: 2591: 2588: 2586: 2583: 2581: 2578: 2576: 2573: 2571: 2568: 2566: 2563: 2561: 2558: 2556: 2553: 2551: 2548: 2546: 2543: 2541: 2538: 2537: 2535: 2528: 2527: 2522: 2517: 2516: 2505: 2501: 2498: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2485: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2461: 2456: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2430:Looper (film) 2426: 2420: 2418: 2417: 2412: 2407: 2406: 2395: 2391: 2388: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2375: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2351: 2346: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2321: 2317: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2300:Looper (film) 2296: 2290: 2286: 2282: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2258:71.121.143.34 2254: 2251: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2236: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2193: 2190: 2187: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2169: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2134: 2132: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2119: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2071: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2060:91.127.108.50 2057: 2046: 2044: 2043: 2039: 2037: 2030: 2028: 2019: 2018: 2013: 2008: 2005: 1999: 1998: 1995: 1991: 1981: 1979: 1978: 1974: 1971: 1965: 1963: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1904: 1902: 1898: 1895: 1894: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1826: 1825: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1795: 1791: 1788: 1787: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1772:Batman Begins 1769: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1711: 1708: 1707: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1661: 1659: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1625: 1607: 1603: 1600: 1594: 1592: 1584: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1559: 1556: 1550: 1548: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1535: 1532: 1526: 1524: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1495: 1492: 1491: 1485: 1478: 1467: 1465: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1450: 1447: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1367: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1356: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1345: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1311: 1299: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1288: 1287: 1283: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1262: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1234: 1230: 1227: 1226: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1209: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1155: 1151: 1148: 1147: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1110: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1087: 1086: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1050: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1028: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1003: 1001: 988: 984: 980: 976: 975: 973: 969: 965: 961: 954: 953: 952: 948: 944: 940: 939: 938: 934: 930: 926: 925: 924: 920: 916: 912: 910: 906: 902: 898: 897: 896: 895: 891: 887: 879: 877: 876: 873: 870: 864: 862: 855: 854: 850: 846: 841: 840: 835: 833: 829: 825: 824:129.12.13.187 821: 812:Philip K Dick 811: 809: 808: 804: 800: 796: 795: 787:Looper Poster 786: 784: 783: 779: 775: 771: 767: 759: 753: 749: 745: 741: 738: 737: 736: 735: 732: 728: 724: 720: 716: 715: 714: 713: 709: 705: 696: 681: 675: 672: 671: 668: 651: 647: 643: 642: 634: 623: 621: 618: 614: 613: 609: 606: 603: 600: 596: 583: 577: 574: 573: 570: 553: 549: 545: 544: 539: 535: 531: 530: 522: 511: 509: 506: 502: 501: 497: 494: 491: 488: 484: 471: 470: 462: 451: 444: 440: 439: 435: 434: 426: 415: 408: 404: 403: 399: 393: 390: 389: 386: 373:United States 367: 364: 362: 359: 357: 354: 352: 351: 347: 345: 342: 341: 338: 334: 333: 325: 314: 312: 309: 305: 304: 300: 296: 292: 287: 286:United States 284: 281: 277: 264: 260: 254: 251: 250: 247: 230: 226: 222: 221: 213: 207: 202: 200: 197: 193: 192: 188: 182: 179: 176: 172: 159: 158: 148: 144: 143: 140: 136:film articles 123: 119: 118:documentation 115: 111: 107: 103: 102: 94: 83: 81: 78: 74: 73: 69: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 2512: 2509: 2484:source check 2463: 2457: 2454: 2427: 2424: 2402: 2399: 2374:source check 2353: 2347: 2344: 2297: 2294: 2255: 2252: 2242:named after 2237: 2234: 2194: 2191: 2188: 2185: 2143:— Preceding 2138: 2120: 2116: 2076:— Preceding 2072: 2054:— Preceding 2050: 2033: 2027:MisterShiney 2026: 2020: 2012:Boracay Bill 2011: 2000: 1985: 1969: 1962:MisterShiney 1961: 1955: 1937:87.79.231.90 1931:— Preceding 1927: 1892: 1872:MisterShiney 1809:MisterShiney 1785: 1779: 1722:MisterShiney 1705: 1687: 1668:MisterShiney 1665: 1645: 1633:MisterShiney 1626: 1623: 1598: 1591:MisterShiney 1590: 1554: 1547:MisterShiney 1546: 1530: 1523:MisterShiney 1522: 1489: 1471: 1451: 1448: 1433: 1353: 1349: 1341: 1340:time loop. 1337: 1333: 1329: 1328: 1309: 1297: 1285: 1280: 1279: 1259: 1224: 1145: 1074:MisterShiney 1051: 1033:— Preceding 1029: 1017:70.79.14.136 1011:— Preceding 1007: 1004:Plot summary 999: 958:— Preceding 883: 868: 861:MisterShiney 860: 856: 845:76.243.45.36 842: 836: 818:— Preceding 815: 794:Tron: Legacy 792: 790: 765: 763: 700: 639: 633:China portal 548:project page 541: 527: 467: 431: 361:Project Talk 349: 330: 258: 218: 155: 99: 40:WikiProjects 2149:Kumagoro-42 1970:Come say hi 1851:Betty Logan 1830:Betty Logan 1744:Thor (film) 1694:), and the 1599:Come say hi 1555:Come say hi 1531:Come say hi 1484:WP:FILMPLOT 1455:Itssaturday 1344:blunderbuss 1109:WP:FILMPLOT 964:66.65.162.5 915:76.94.37.86 886:76.94.37.86 869:Come say hi 534:WikiProject 425:Film portal 93:Film portal 2534:Categories 2521:Report bug 2411:Report bug 2238:Also, was 2198:Bellagio99 2004:Wtmitchell 1338:continuous 552:discussion 538:U.S. state 122:guidelines 110:open tasks 2504:this tool 2497:this tool 2394:this tool 2387:this tool 2010:(earlier 1990:BOVINEBOY 1437:Millahnna 1398:Millahnna 1219:Movieline 1177:Millahnna 1138:. Also, 1114:Millahnna 1059:Millahnna 764:Googling 760:Louisiana 744:GaidinBDJ 295:Louisiana 2510:Cheers.— 2400:Cheers.— 2253:Thanks. 2244:Kid Blue 2240:Kid Blue 2229:Kid Blue 2168:Fru1tbat 2157:contribs 2145:unsigned 2078:unsigned 2056:unsigned 1933:unsigned 1696:MOS:FILM 1583:Tiller54 1175:scale. 1035:unsigned 1013:unsigned 960:unsigned 820:unsigned 799:Lacon432 778:contribs 727:contribs 557:Missouri 543:Missouri 493:Missouri 64:American 2434:my edit 2304:my edit 2277:DonIago 2213:DonIago 1780:Skyfall 929:Charlr6 261:on the 30:C-class 2007:(talk) 1298:thinks 1091:Nerfer 979:Tarage 943:Skeith 913:Link? 901:Prebys 366:Alerts 291:Cinema 36:scale. 1897:Smith 1893:Cliff 1790:Smith 1786:Cliff 1710:Smith 1706:Cliff 1649:Jcr13 1494:Smith 1490:Cliff 1229:Smith 1225:Cliff 1173:WP:RS 1150:Smith 1146:Cliff 1055:WP:OR 655:China 646:China 605:China 2281:talk 2262:talk 2217:talk 2202:talk 2172:talk 2153:talk 2126:talk 2103:talk 2086:talk 2064:talk 1994:2008 1941:talk 1912:talk 1876:talk 1867:here 1855:talk 1834:talk 1813:talk 1738:See 1726:talk 1684:here 1680:here 1676:here 1672:talk 1666:So, 1653:talk 1637:talk 1573:talk 1510:talk 1477:Plot 1459:talk 1441:talk 1417:talk 1402:talk 1375:talk 1301:him? 1181:talk 1118:talk 1095:talk 1078:talk 1063:talk 1043:talk 1021:talk 983:talk 968:talk 947:talk 933:talk 919:talk 905:talk 890:talk 880:Plot 849:talk 828:talk 803:talk 774:talk 770:Erik 748:talk 723:talk 719:Erik 708:talk 532:, a 127:Film 112:and 59:Film 2478:RfC 2448:to 2368:RfC 2338:to 2328:to 2318:to 1952:Joe 1782:). 674:??? 576:??? 540:of 392:??? 253:Mid 2536:: 2491:. 2486:}} 2482:{{ 2381:. 2376:}} 2372:{{ 2283:) 2264:) 2256:-- 2219:) 2204:) 2174:) 2166:-- 2159:) 2155:• 2128:) 2105:) 2088:) 2066:) 1943:) 1914:) 1878:) 1857:) 1836:) 1815:) 1774:, 1770:, 1766:, 1762:, 1758:, 1754:, 1750:, 1746:, 1742:, 1728:) 1655:) 1639:) 1575:) 1512:) 1480:}} 1474:{{ 1461:) 1443:) 1419:) 1404:) 1377:) 1183:) 1120:) 1097:) 1080:) 1065:) 1045:) 1023:) 985:) 970:) 949:) 935:) 921:) 907:) 892:) 851:) 830:) 805:) 780:) 776:| 750:) 729:) 725:| 710:) 293:/ 289:: 62:: 2523:) 2519:( 2506:. 2499:. 2413:) 2409:( 2396:. 2389:. 2279:( 2260:( 2215:( 2200:( 2170:( 2151:( 2124:( 2101:( 2084:( 2062:( 2035:✉ 2014:) 1973:) 1967:( 1939:( 1910:( 1874:( 1853:( 1832:( 1811:( 1724:( 1670:( 1651:( 1635:( 1602:) 1596:( 1571:( 1558:) 1552:( 1534:) 1528:( 1508:( 1457:( 1439:( 1415:( 1400:( 1373:( 1179:( 1116:( 1093:( 1076:( 1061:( 1041:( 1019:( 981:( 966:( 945:( 931:( 917:( 903:( 888:( 872:) 866:( 847:( 826:( 801:( 772:( 746:( 721:( 706:( 682:. 584:. 554:. 472:. 436:. 400:. 265:. 160:. 124:. 42::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index