Talk:Lord Voldemort/Archive 3

621:(1997): In the first book of the HP series, JKR introduced Lord Voldemort as a sinister, powerful dark wizard, referred to in the opening conversation between the characters Dumbledore and McGonagall. JKR establishes that Voldemort has been responsible for a great war in the wizarding world. In addition, he is responsible for the death of the parents of protagonist Harry Potter and was disembodied when he tried to kill Harry, leaving Harry with a lightning scar on his face.(ref HP1, chapter 1) In the course of the story, Rowling describes him as the ultimate archenemy of Hogwarts, letting her characters only refer to him fearfully as "You Know Who".(ref HP1, chapter whatsoever)(ref HP1, chapter whatsoever)(ref HP1, chapter whatsoever) In the end, Rowling reveals he has possessed Professor Quirrell to get the Philosophers Stone in order to win a new body.(ref HP1, chapter whatsoever) 699:

read these reviews here on wiki, don't know where, but someone here has made it their business to record what outsiders think of wiki, so perhaps you could find it and have a read. However, I do endorse it. It is a failing in any article on any subject not to tell the reader what is believed to be the best guess or course, if that is the best that can be achieved. Of course, certainty is to be preferred, by the difficulty with the OR policy is that it is frequently used as a mechanism to exclude content, despite that content being the best available. Those reviewers had identified what they considered a failing of wiki, but which wiki officially considers a virtue. The phrase 'throwing the baby out with the bathwater' comes to mind.

729:

and so forth. I think this is more useful to a reader. It is a logical re-organisation of the mixed up information which has been presented piece by piece scattered through the books. Furthermore, there already exist separate whole articles about each book which tell the rreader the main points of what was in that particular book. If they want to know the plot of book 6, then read the book 6 article. If they want a sensibly re-organised account of the important points of Voldemort's life, then they ought to look here, and find it here. The objective is to do something more useful than simply listing events as they were originally presented. The original presentation was intended to confuse.

2035:. I feel that if you classify Voldemort as immortal, it would mean he could never die, which would certainly make for a spoiled ending of DH, which we definitely don't have yet. My bad about London; for some reason I thought he was somewhere else (York? dunno why). As for treason, well, he switched to the Dark Side, but to me it seems like he basically created the Dark Side and thus was already on it when he went on his wild killing spree, not betraying some other side. If somebody has an argument for treason, though, I'd love to hear it, but I'm thinking that he hasn't really betrayed the Dark Side ever. -- 806:

read INFORMATION (yes, this includes book related citations) about the subject they are searching for. It is ridiculous for you to assume that individual opinions are what feed wiki; it is knowledge, FACTS and the like that are encouraged here; this is an attempt to build an encyclopedia that, through hard work and concrete information, may be used in schools and other higher learning institutions to aid in research. As of right now, because of the high volume of irrational opinionists like yourself, that is not possible. Please don't mar wiki's name with your foolishness. (Maytrix Ink)

1470:

with a heavy spoiler message. The problem became the redirect stub for anyone who searched for "Tom Marvolo Riddle", which automatically redirected to Voldemort, and at first without any spoiler warning, and it became balky and ineffective to try to put up a "spoiler warning gate" to click through at the redirect link. Meanwhile the Voldemort article became long and difficult to manage with the spoilers and essentially the two different "personalities" of Riddle/Voldemort. The best compromised approach was reached by consensus of many editors and HP Project folks. A

2890:

final Horcrux (presumably out of an object of Gryffindor's) with Harry's death. As this did not happen, Voldemort had only five Horcruxes when he returned to his father's house in the first chapter of Goblet of Fire. It was at this point, and with the death of Frank Bryce, that Voldmoert created his sixth Horcrux out of Nagini (although it could be argued Nagini is the seventh, since he unintentionally made Harry a Horcrux, but to Voldemort's knowledge, Nagini was number six).

2381:. This has been discussed at length (above and also in the archives), and I believe the consensus has been not to merge, and to keep the two character articles as separate articles; there were compelling reasons to keep them separate and no compelling reasons to combine them. If something has changed which would compel us into combining the articles again, then let's discuss that here. Otherwise I would suggest the merger tags be removed as per previous consensus. -- 31: 2694:

together when Harry went to face Voldemort in the forest, as he went to death willingly, but with the hidden agenda of repeating what his mother did - being a death / love sacrifice to invoke the ancient magic to protect all those he loved (his friends, the D.A., The Order, his teachers, etc.). In one bold move he stripped Voldemort of a huge part of his power as spells he cast on Harry's friends simply didn't work very well.

100: 376:(2), the real difficulty is that Rowling is not talking and will not untill the series is finished, for the very obvious rerason that she cannot. Given that she has a £500,000,000 reason not to tell us the truth about her characters yet, even her own comments have to be treated with a great deal of caution. For that amount of money I would lie through my teeth when asked questions about the characters. 1617:

magic Riddle did not. Harry did not fear death, as he knew his sacrifice not only meant he would be with the ones who death had taken on his own terms, but also because he knew his sacrifice would protect everybody he loved. ... D.A., teachers, Phoenix members. He knew how to do what his mother did - a simple silence charm of Voldemort wasn't binding after that kind of sacrifice.

1576:

Anakin/Vader, where it is expressly spelled out that most people considered them to be separate (i.e. Anakin "died" when Vader was "born"), Rowling goes to great lengths to consistantly portray Riddle and Voldemort as the same person. I don't care in the end whether the Riddle stuff is merged or not, it just seems unnecessary doubling of information about one single character.

2623:"Voldemort's death obviously marks the end of the terrible Second Wizarding War and Voldemort's reign of power over all of Great Britain's Wizarding World. By the reaction the Wizarding World after Voldemort's first downfall, it can surely be assummed that the wizarding world yet again rejoiced, possibly even more than the last time." 383:, and the individual articles on each book (Harry Potter and...). It does not help the conceptual arrangement of the HP articles as a whole if all that information were reproduced here. Nor would it help that this article was tripled in length my reproducing that stuff here. This article has to be judged as one part of a whole. 1311:, a FA about another fictional character: split fictional character bio into publication history (real dates), and a concise fictional bio (in-universe, but based on pub history) as of WP:WAF. I tried to be easy on the original fictional bio, trying to save good chunks, but I am wary of fictional dates. Fiction is not fact. 2480:'Chapter One. The Dark Lord Ascending. The two men appeared out of nowhere, a few yards apart in the narrow, moonlit lane. For a second they stood quite still, wands pointing at each other's chests: then, recognising each other, they stowed their wands beneath their cloaks and set off, side by side, in the same direction. 526:

the text longer and detracts from the natural way any reader expects to read a story. This is exactly the same argument as whether people watching cowboys shooting indians on TV can appreciate that what they are watching is fiction, and not how real people behave. Of course they understand the difference.

386:(4) NOR is always very difficult in fiction. I havn't read the article in detail recently, but in general it does put forward anything other than summarising the way the character is portrayed within the books. Arguable references to section supporting the statements would be useful, but this is not OR. 2270:

Andrew MacNeille from the University of Cologne state that Voldemort is a deeply racist and fascist tyrant, and a main example of bigots in contemporary pop culture." Surely there is a way the article can stress Voldemort's power, evilness and megalomania in a somewhat more detatched and formal style.

2869:

If the kids say it's their favorite character, then it's their favorite character. It's not like they're lying, and it's a little presumptuous to assume that "Oh, they're kids, so he's not really their favorite literary villain". LotR is aimed towards adults, and I admit that while LotR has some very

1985:

been destroyed, thus rendering him currently immortal. If one seeks to argue that the books are not finished and he may in fact have all his Horcruxes destroyed in Book 7 and die sometime after, then that's fine, the category can stay off. If anyone else agrees with my argument that we should include

1557:

We've discussed this already. And anyways, isn't there the whole "rebirth" thing? Voldemort, for all practical purposes, "died", then came back to life, could he still be truly called the old Tom Riddle? I'm probably wrong, but just a thought. And yes, I know his soul was still out there. But really,

997:

I had a look at the GA page, and as best as I could understand the page, there are very few fiction 'good articles' on all wiki, though to be fair very few 'good articles' all together. However, Harry Potter is listed as one. I would point out that this article needs to be judged as a companion piece

698:

As a point of interest, the reference to wiki's failings on my page (in that wiki does not express opinions) was actually lifted from a couple of reviews of wiki by external agencies (newspaper articles), which criticised wiki specifically that it failed to express a clear view on certain subjects. I

459:

Then, the article does NOT make clear that Voldy is a fictional character, created by JKR. It inserts a “fictional” in the first sentence, then goes on straight-facedly that he was born in 1926, started a great war, was disembodied etc. etc., establishing book summaries as a biography. This is a very

3005:

First, it'd be wise to mention that Andrzej Polkowski, the Polish translator of "Harry Potter" books, mentioned in the "etymology section" of the book that he decided to leave Voldemort's birth name in its original English form. Second, the Russian variation of his name, Volan-de-Mort, sounds like a

2889:

The article states that Nagini was a Horcrux before Lord Voldemort attacked the Potters. This is incorrect. Before the attack on the Potters, Voldemort had in place the following Horcruxes: the diary, the ring, the locket, the cup, the diadem of Ravenclaw. He was intending to create his sixth and

2250:

This excerpt gives evidence that there are other members to the Salazar Slytherin line that are not mentioned on the given family tree on the Knowledge (XXG) webpage. I just want to make it clear that it is understood by me that this is all of the information given out to Harry Potter fans, etc. I

2245:

Lack of sense coupled with a great grandeur meant that the family gold was squandered several generations before Marvolo was born. He, as you saw, was left in squalor and poverty, with a very nasty temper, a fantastic amount of arrogance and pride, and a couple of family heirlooms that he treasured

2230:

Although I know not much information was given on Voldemort's entire family tree or family history in the books, and the information that is featured on this webpage consists of all anyone really knows, I just want to make clear that this Family Tree is NOT complete and there is MORE to it, but as I

1469:

Agree with Onomatopoeia. In addition - this issue was discussed and debated at great length a few months ago - discussions are preserved in the archives. At one time there were separate articles for Tom Marvolo Riddle and for Lord Voldemort. Then they were in fact merged into just Lord Voldemort,

525:

I did read some of the examples quoted, even made a few edits to red and Black. My objection stands. Some of the examples I have seen quoted use virtually the same text as in an in-univers version, except with frequent, 'the author writes', 'later in the story it is explained by's addded. Just makes

136:

In Chamber of Secrets, in the flashback of Riddel, his wand is black, or dark brown, however, in present day, its white and appears boney white. Since we know that Riddel acquired his wand from the same shop as Harry, and the same phoenix gave the feather, could this be a bit of incosistancy between

2693:

Harry's extra powers is multi-faceted, but it comes down to two simple things; he loves, and he isn't afraid of death, at least if it was a brave death. Also, Harry's boggart is extremely revealing - it's dementor, which Lupin told Harry meant that he was only afraid of fear. The two were blended

2683:

First of all, the prophecy referred to Harry, not Dumbledore...So. That you are "equal" to someone doesn't mean you have the same beliefs. It's a reference to Harry's power being equal to Voldy's because of what Voldemort did. This is all outlined quite well in the 7th book, not sure if you've read

2406:

during the film version, the scene when the fat lady attempts to break glass at the top of her voice, the portrait to the bottom left shows lord voldemort waving a wand. this is clearly the same dark lord that is seen in the goblet of fire film. the perfect time if you watch uk dvd is exactly from

1616:

Don't unmerge again - Tom Marvolo Riddle is the beginning, middle, and end of Lord Voldemort. While Voldemort abandoned his given name, two people dared to call him out for what he was - Tom Marvolo Riddle. Dumbledore and Harry Potter. The truth is, both were better men and wizards and both knew

728:

As to this article, instinctively I would prefer the article not to retell the book volume by volume, chapter by chapter. I therefore prefer that information about Voldemort should be re-organised, so that first we discuss his early days, then his exile years, then his rise to power, then his fall,

2906:

JKR said that the horcruxes were made using the following people's deaths: The diary - Moaning Myrtle. The ring - Tom Riddle snr. The cup - Hepzibah Smith, the previous owner. The locket - a Muggle tramp. The diadem - an Albanian peasant. Nagini - Bertha Jorkins (Voldemort could use a wand once he

2678:

Lord Voldemort definetly doesn't mark Dumbledore as his equal. It's true that he sees Dumbledore as the biggest threat to him (with the possible but unlikely exception of Harry), but he constantly talks about his weaknesses including thinking that love is the greatest protection and that there are

2617:

The content that has been added in the wake of the release of the seventh book is absolutely repugnant. Everything from "The Final Battle" to "Aftermath" in the Fictional Character Biography section is bloated, poorly written, ridden with spelling and punctuation errors, and violates nearly every

2269:

The entire article appears to be written a little too dramatically for an encyclopedia article. "Throughout the series Rowling establishes Voldemort as an utterly inhuman mass-murderer" - then later - "a supremely powerful, intelligent and ruthless dark wizard" -"Furthermore, Birgit Zimmermann and

1474:

article was created, featuring all the known Riddles, and especially featuring a Tom Marvolo Riddle section representing his pre-Voldemort days (infancy, at the orphanage, and up through his early years at Hogwarts). The cutoff of Riddle/Voldemort was somewhere about the time that Tom created his

521:

No problems about a long reply, attention is appreciated. However, I must point out that this is wiki. The very first rule is that there are no rules except that the decision of Jimbo Wales is final, everything else is decided by consensus. Everything is debateable. It is very annoying when people

3086:

overrun by fancruft, original research, and mind-boggling in-universe accounts which do not interest anybody but the uber geeks, but as a guy who wrote 1 "featured" article and nine "good" ones, I have to step in. If not, the article will surely have faced another good article review, which would

1302:

Hi, after this article got demoted from GA after taking much flak in the last GA review, I skimmed over the talk page and found certain remarks about the strong in-universe view of the article. I was bold and rewrote a good part of the article, intending to put Voldy back into GA range (WP:WIAGA,

1155:

someone suggested moving this page to Voldemort, rather than Lord Voldemort. To prevent future difficulties, I moved it back. Also because it is arguable his name is 'Lord', not simply his title. Or, indeed, his name arguably should be 'I am Lord Voldemort'. However, does anyone have any views on

1052:

Well, in about 5-10 years, there'll be enough reputable published critical research and opinion to write externally without introducing the much-hated opinions and original research. Until then, all we can do is report the facts as they stand in the books (especially since, mistakenly in my view,

805:

Sandpiper, your preference in terms of the content of the article is not nearly as important as the rules defined by Knowledge (XXG) as a whole; to be precise, it matters almost as much as your opinion. Users do not frequent Wiki because they are interested in POV essays, but because they wish to

216:

In French or in Latin roots "Vol" also means "flight: or "flying". "de mort" means "of death" or "from death", "from" when used with a place name. I believe that the name means "Flight of Death" or in more typical english translation "Flying Death" since we see in the escape from the Dursley's

1788:

Seeing as how it bills itself as "comprehensive", I think it should include Japanese. His name is transliterated rather than translated (トム・マールヴォロ・リドル = Tom Marvolo Riddle, ヴォルデモート殿　is Voldemort plus the Japanese honorific commonly translated as Lord. I have the book in front of me and you can

1575:

But they are never considered to be two different people. No character, even those who do not refer to him as Riddle, ever act as if they are separate people. They always refer to them as one person. Rowling certainly never treats them as separate once his identity is revealed. Again, unlike

1343:

Hope you like the new version, I think it is less crufty, more relevant in real life now and more accessible for non-fans. If you feel something is missing, feel free to re-add it in an appropriate way; in my rewrite, I could impossibly bring in everything without disturbing the flow. Just avoid

740:

Having been reading the ongoing war on WP:Not re plot summaries, where plainly one faction is continuing to try to ban them entirely, it also seems to me that my approach is rather more satisfactory for those who oppose plot summary altogether. The objective is not to simply re-tell the story as

3010:

from "Faust" and "Master and Margarita". If anyone could confirm or deny this, I'd be most grateful. Oh, and by the way: in Ukrainian, the name "Yarvolod" means something along the lines of "strong ruler" or "cruel ruler" ("Yar-" means "strong", "powerful", "cruel" or "strict", while, as noted,

2700:

Harry has been afraid a few times, but they were the normal fears born of insecurity, such as if the Sorting Hat would reject him outright, or asking Cho Chang out to the ball. He's never shown fear in the face of grave danger. A few times he's even embraced death, noting that he'd see Sirius

2569:

While I do think we should have a better main image that shows Voldemort more as he normally is, I don't think that specific one would do, since he doesn't really wear that kind of clothing. However, a picture which shows him wearing his normal robes (especially the OotP ones) and with a normal

1628:

First of all, I am neithmerging or un-merging this article. Secondly, it probably isn't a good idea to merge before we settle on what to do-andwe've already decided not to merge once before.If you want it merged, slap a tag on the articles and discuss it here before you just go ahead and merge.

2932:

We do have definitive knowledge that it wasn't used in Voldemort's initial reign of terror: Dumbledore, the contemporary rival and utmost scholar on Voldemort's activities says (in the first book) that he'd been trying without success to convince people to call him by his real name. Dumbledore

2161:

Of course Voldemort is immortal. Being immortal just means you live forever. It doesn't mean you cannot be destroyed. And Voldemort is for the time being indestructable anyway, thanks to the Horcruxes. And furthermore might I enquire as to why Voldemort has been installed into the category of

2832:

I agree with the user right above, and to the one above him: I dunno which drawing the other user was speaking of, if it came from the books, I'd understand. However, even if it came from the books, there is only one image in the entire series which I would consider good enough to illustrate

2858:

Someone added that British school children voted voldemort as their favorite literary villain of all time. My question is, should this be an accurate assumption? Harry Potter is the fad now, so it seems to me that it's quite obvious that they'll vote him as their favorite villain. It may be

1201:

On the contrary: we KNOW that he taught at the school for more than one year, and we KNOW that it is impossible for a teacher to not be out by the end of the year. Therefore, the only way these canon statements are both true is if he taught a year, went off for a year, came back for a year.

379:(3), to say Voldemort was created 1997 is an interesting fact which arguably ought to be included, but it is a completely different fact than that he was 'born' in 1926. The two are not substitutes. But in fact, anyone interested in general background real-world information ought to read 2175:

I fixed a small error where it says in the bio that Voldemort murdered his uncle Morfin along with his father and grandparents. Someone else may wish fix it up a little more, since I just did a quick fix to remove the glaring contradiction it creates with what is in the next section.

1602:

They were probably un-merged because a merge idea has been discussed already and the consenus was to not merge them. Read what T-dot said above. As for the name, the fact that there are seperate articles at this time means that this article's name would continue to be Lord Voldemort.

1181:

It says in the article that, to paraphrase, "Voldemort placed a jynx on the Defence Against the Dark Arts office so that no teacher could work for more than a consecutive year." However, Quirrel was there for more than a year, as his tenure predated Harry's entrance into Hogwarts.

2928:

The article suggests ignorance regarding Voldemort's employment or non employment of the name charm in the First War. The 'name charm' I'm talking about is the charm that identifies the location of anyone who says 'Voldemort'; it's used in the last book to capture the main trio.

1354:

This looks great! I don't have time to go through it all right now, but I thinnk we just need to standardize the looks of the references, and get some citations for the "Name" section and subsection. But thanks for your work -- the article suffered a lot since it was de-GA'ed.

425:

is not debatable, it is an official guideline. Suggesting to circumvent the JKR references “to retain the flow of the article” is firstly forbidden, and secondly the proof of lazy writing. Colleagues from other fiction Wikiprojects like Star Wars, Comics or Star Trek adhere to

3023:

The name of Voldemort was left unchanged by the Polish translator because Tom Marvolo Riddle is almost a perfect anagram of Polish phrase "Jam Lord Voldemort" (somehow poetic and slightly archaic way of saying "I am Lord Voldemort"). It is mentioned in numerous places e.g.

1475:

first Horcrux, and the rest of the Riddle and Gaunt family essentially ceased to exist. Just wanted you to know this arrangement was worked out as the best solution we could come up with. Re-merging will bring back the same old problems with redirecting spoilers etc. --

1807:

I´m from Argentina and, logically, I have the books in spanish (except for the sixth). I wanted to tell you that in the Spanish version, Voldemort´s name is still Tom Marvolo Riddle, and then they put "yo soy Lord Voldemort" explaining it was a translation difficulty.

1558:

Riddle and Voldemort are very, very different. It just so happens that no one in HP even calls Voldy Riddle anymore, with the obvious exception of Dumbledore and Harry. If they are pretty much considered two seperate people in the book, why not on the wiki article?

1401:

I think Lord Voldemort should be merged with Tom Marvolo Riddle since they are both the same person at different times of his life. In the books, there is not made any difference between them, on the contrary the teenage is always referred to as Voldemort in

551:

Thanks for your input. Until now, this has been a good discussion. As for your objections, I understand your points, but I firmly disagree. Until now, speaking of my own XP, the rules have only improved the articles, and not following them has made them

1669:

Excellently rewritten. Comprehensive and well-written, explains Lord Voldemort very well. My biggest suggestion is to add inlines in the parts where there are stretches without any. Otherwise, you might want to get a peer review for a FA assessment.

1002:. At least, in that case, writing 'Weiss and Hickman wrote' every other paragraph does make sense, because the character also appears in books by different authors. Otherwise it is unhelpfull repetition to keep reminding the reader who wrote the books. 2204:

Does anyone know the anagram used in the Japanese translations? It's not here, and it doesn't seem to be on the Japanese article either. Or did they even use one? They very well could have just used the English "I am Lord Voldemort" and "Tom Marvolo

2260:

Additionally: Also the family tree fails to take into account the Peverells. It would also be interesting to note that Voldemort is descended from the second brother (whose name I forget), while Harry is a descendent of the third (Ignotius).

1792:

Plus one random comment: "plot dump", which is used twice, does not strike me as an NPOV phrasing. I think it implies a value judgment about the authorial skill with which the transfer of information was accomplished, in my experience. See

464:: inserting a fig-leaf “X is a fictional person” in sentence 1, and then going on 100% in-universe. This is forbidden. The magical words are “JKR wrote that… “, “JKR established that…” or “JKR portrayed him as…” and others. You must use this! 137:

Chamber of Secrets and Goblet of Fire and beyond? Can wands change color? He had a black wand (phoenix feather) and somehow the story changes its appearance, and maintains the concept that it is the sister wand of Harry's. (Phoenix Feather).

2539:

Why does his Allegiance say to the Death Eaters? In my opinion, it should say to himself. The Death Eaters are loyal to him as their leader, but he does not like to trust anyone. Wouldn't it make more sense to put Allegiance to Himself?

1835:

Is the entire article a spoiler? Because I don't see an end to the part of the article that is denoted a spoiler, and being that I've yet to read any HP books, I'm not sure where it would end. I'm afraid to read the rest of the article.

456:. The Harry Potter books are not an official biography of a person, who (born in the 1920s) must have co-existed with Gandhi, Einstein, Ford or Hitler. VOLDEMORT WAS CREATED IN 1997 BY J K ROWLING. This is the only correct way to do it. 1990:

the next book comes out and we can be sure if it holds true, then good on them. Keep in mind that we can't keep a category off this page because it could possibly technically be speculation; if that held true, then we couldn't have

249:. Just few words on how JKR sees Voldemort (this could be an entire section, WP:WAF!), his cultural impact, how other writers see him, how his actors (Fiennes) see him, or other real-life info. Much of the text is a violation of 2655:

Also, to compare book and film really isn't the greatest thing to do...the book is written for people to imagine what's happening, the film actually shows what's happening, and therefore illustrates the same scenes differently.

2859:

varifiable, but to me, the reliability is low because it's coming from chidren (an unnofficial group of people) who are absorbed in the fad and probably haven't read (eg) Lord of the Rings because of the adult nature of it. --

893:

Thank you. I bookmarked the Good Articles page. However, I still think Darth Vader is little better than this one. There is a section called "Redemption" that, except for the first throw away line, is totally in-universe.

2327:

I don't think so, unless it is specifically established within the books that he has a mental illness. True, he's ruthless and power-hungry, but on that basis just about any fictional villain could be put into that category.

1859:

on Knowledge (XXG)), but I will say it encourages you to read the series so that you can pretend you're all caught up! Just the same, I've put in endspoiler tags, and a second set of spoiler tags near the bottom of the page.

1086:

I think I agree with you on online sources. An online fan forum editorial, especially one that allows reader comments, is in principle an acceptable reference. Unfortunately, I was not able to easily find one that is

1072:

The difficulty in finding good thrid party references is a separate problem. Even if the article is entirely derived from the work of fiction itself, it need not need be written from a perspective within the fictional

998:

to that article, which effectively contains the 'real world' information relevant to this. I see no point in reproducing that information here. I noticed that there are two 'good article's about characters, including

2515:

In the first Harry Potter movie, Hagrid has a describes why Harry is so famous. Durring which, a clip of Voldemort killing the Potters plays. His face is hidden, but someone played him in this scene. Who was it?

1267:

I noticed that "He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named" will rederict, but "You-Know-Who" doesn't (there isn't an article titled that either). Since a lot of characters call him that, wouldn't it make sense to do this?

2652:

I believe that was them apparating through the Ministry, not actually flying, and it was in the confines of a building. Voldemort was actually flying through the open air, at least the speed of a flying

1166:

I think he would describe himself as 'Lord Voldemort' rather than 'Voldemort'. Certainly, he always seems to refer to himself as the former. I think the 'I am' bit has, significantly, been cast aside.

2302:

I was wondering if maybe we should install Voldemort into the category of Fictional characters with mental illness as in both the books and films he does give the impression of being quite insane.

313:- the phrases "JKR wrote that Voldemort is...", "JKR fleshed out Voldemorts history by adding" or "JKR established a new side of Voldemort, protraying him as..." should appear 100x in this article. 471:

makes the article cumbersome, is fortunately flat out wrong. In the contrary, it makes the article BETTER. Firmly keeping in mind that this is a work of fiction greatly enhances your scope. Just

2755:

Seeing as how movie Voldemort is the most official decent depiction of him, and how his depiction in the movie is in fact very close to that of the books, I'd say we leave the movie picture. --

2076:, on the grounds that, technically when he did his first deed, he was considered to be on the right side of the law. Therefore he did commit treason. Anyways, thats my reasoning. 'Nuff said. 936:

I am sorry to say that as per the good article review (see link above), it has been decided to take away the GA distinction from this article. In a nutshell, the main reasons were (see also

1981:. He uses Horcruxes, and as we all know anyone who uses one or more Horcrux is immortal until all the Horcruxes utilised are destroyed. Insofar, all of his Horcruxes have yes that's right 2684:

it yet, but the deal is that Voldemort marked Harry with the scar, and gave Harry power equal to his own. Yet Harry also had "unkown" power, which related, I believe, to the Elder Wand.

2642:

Why does everyone seem so shocked that Voldemort can fly? Weren't members of the Order of the Phoenix and the Death Eaters flying around the Department of Mysteries in the fifth movie?

1969:

I guess I should defend why I think three categories I put on this page, that were taken off, should remain on. I probably should just add them on now and defend them on the talk page

162:

It's spelled Voldemort, not Voldermort. "I am Lord Voldemort" is a scramble of "Tom Marvolo Riddle". The image name is also spelled wrong, but I don't have time to fix it atm. --

400:

1), No, that kind of abstraction just makes the text longer (it is quite long enough). It is perfectly plain that this article is describing fiction, which is the important point.

1106:

The references should be updated to reflect information that has become available: It probably is now known for sure if Ralph Fiennes reprises his role as Lord Voldemort, right?

2833:

Voldemort, but even that doesn't show his face, which makes his appearance in the movies the second most official and best (in almost everyway) representation of him we have. --

1700:

For anyone that's interested, I've suggested on the project page that we choose another page to rewrite in the same style. Anyone who wants to get involved (and that means you,

2190:

Minor point: the quote in the second sentence, by Rabbi Jack Abramowicz, appears to have been substantially altered by anonymous users. I restored it to what he actually said.

2950:

The article claims that in the second book the name Voldemort is "cursed", technically it has been jinxed. This is nomenclature used by JK Rowling. Can someone change this?

2337:

I agree. There is nothing in the books to suggest that Voldemort has an actual mental illness, and until J.K. Rowling specifically says that he does, it cannot be added.

490:: as significant count interviews with the creators, newspaper articles, essays from reputable critics etc. etc. There are none mentioned or referenced in this article. If 2544:

Seconded. Voldemort has no loyalty to his cronies, he cares little if they die in his service and appears very much ready to torture and kill them himself. Thus, changed.

1590:

I have merged the articles and someone has unmerged them again even though most people want them merged. I agree with Rotten Venetic and think the articles name should be

2776:

I'm till confused why a drawing could illustrate the character better than an image form the film. I mean, did that drawing come from the book or was it created by fans?

2251:

just wanted to make clear that it is evident that there are more people included in the family tree and that this Family Tree that is featured is not completely correct.

2241:'..."Voldemort's grandfather, yes," said Dumbledore. "Marvolo, his son, Morfin, and his daughter, Merope, were the last of the Gaunts, a very ancient Wizarding family 1525:, as that is his name whereas voldemort is a nickname. I don't know how to make such advanced changes, being that I'm a very occasional wikipedian, or indeed if I can. 522:

resort to quoting rules to justify their actions without any better explanation. In fact, that is more annoying than the rules themselves.(which may even be justified)

184:

Although the article states Rowling pronounced Voldemort's name with a silent t, during her webcast reading of Deathly Hallows on July 20, 2007 she pronounces the t.

437:(a pillar of Knowledge (XXG), FYI) then DO NOT ADD IT, please! It does not get any simpler. OR is a very safe way to diminish your article, let alone for GA status. 2618:

single rule Knowledge (XXG) has established. Among the offending passages is this, which I find representational of the inadequate tone of the recent additions:

486:

No, sorry, the article does not contain significant amounts of real-life data. Apart from two quotes and the film section (which is slightly better), nada. Read

3068:

Dealt with the heavy recentiism in the article, concerning part 7. Especially the Deathly Hallows part was a pure blow-by-blow account of the plot, violating

2559:

I think the main picture should be when Voldemort is on the Kings Crss Station wearing a tuxedo. It shows his whole veature, not just his face. Anybody Agree?

3048:

Hi community, as a member of the Good Article WikiProject, Harry Potter WikiProject and the main author of the Lord Voldemort article which was promoted to

3026:]. So the remark about the translation difficulties is not correct. The Polish translator was lucky, and did not really need to change/translate anything. 1501:

page. This would show that they are two very different parts of the same (physical) person, but still show that they are two distinct and separate things.

1012:

I think that it is the case that a lot of conscientious work has been put into this article, and many others like it, but the direction has been wrong. --

969:

Absence of real-life information (e.g. interviews of the creator, newspaper articles, interviews of the actors, essays of reputable critics etc. etc., see

231:

As a member of the GA WikiProject, I am frankly stunned to see this article in the GA list. Here a comprehensive list of shortcomings I found according to

577:), but rather in structure. The main problem is the start in 1926, which is a bad thing. The by far best order of portrayal of all fictional chars is in 342:

I am quite hard on this article, because I think Voldemort is a very cool character who deserves a very cool article. In this sense, happy wiki-ing! —

176:

The article says that whenever somebody says his name in the seventh book, Death Eaters appear, but I thought that is was Snatchers that appeared...?

1321:

sourced the fictional data; note I used chapter references instead of page refs, because the English and American versions have different page counts

987:. Compared to other GAs about fictional people, this sticks out like a sore thumb. I would be happy to re-review it after cleaning up above issues. — 2031:

All right, well, we discussed (briefly, thought there was a much more drawn-out discussion, but I guess I was misremembering or can't find it) back

573:

The main problem is not in prose (I am admittedly picky on "the writer says", I admit that; but however, I enforce that rule myself, see my own GA (

1540:

Unlike Anakin and Clark, Tom Riddle and Lord Voldemort are only treated as separate characters when Harry, et. al. are unaware of who he is. From

844:

I would love to see an example of a properly created article about a fictional character according to these "Good Article" standards. I looked up

627:(1998): ... JKR introduces the diary of Tom Marvolo Riddle. In the climax of the story, she establishes that Riddle is the young Lord Voldemort ... 2017:. Are we sure that throughout his entire life he has never done any act that may be considered treason? If not, then sure, that stays off as well. 977:

As of now, the article carries these yokes, indicating a heavy editing is necessary: {{tl:Unreferenced}} {{tl:Cleanup fiction-as-fact}} {{tl:OR}}

105: 192:"Flight (or wings) of death"? Might what to reference what language that is. "De mort" is "of death" in French, but "vol" is "theft", isn't it? 2709:

I think the picture should be changed to a drawing since keeping the film character doesn't seem right when talking about a book's character.

2014: 2001: 1926:

Your browser must have loaded a version of the article when the page had been blanked, as it appeared for six minutes earlier this morning,

2318: 2286: 585:

bringing in his past as Tom Marvolo Riddle, Book 3 fleshes out his past with the Death Eaters, etc. etc. Real life publishing dates : -->

581:, i.e. in this case Book 1, Book 2, Book 3 … Book 6. Book 1 establishes his backstory and his status as embodiment of evil, Book 2 is a 2441:

It could possibly be another extremely pale, gaunt, evil-looking wizard who happens to be in a painting that happens to be in Hogwarts.

2243:

noted for a vein of instability and violence that flourished through the generations due to their habit of marrying their own cousins.

2097:

is 'crimes against the state'? Whatever 'side' he is on, if he has committed crimes against the state, then he has committed treason.

1995:

categories on this page because it could turn out in HP7 that everything the reader knows about Voldemort is in fact an elaborate lie.

1544:

onwards, they are always treated as a single character and the articles should reflect that. The Riddle material needs to be merged.

2679:

things worse than death.... ...But wait there's more! actually not, but have you noticed that every commercial says that these days.

305:) an example how NOT to write about fictional characters. It is cruft. Please improve, and as a rule of thumb, following guidelines: 1229:

Under the Final battle heading it says: "Olivander tells him that it was Priori Incantatem and that Voldeomrt merely needed". The

2713:'s page has a more appropriate infobox picture. Also, this is not how the character is meant and described to look in the books. 2145: 2059: 1954: 1884: 1379: 1140: 151:

Seriously, pick a tense, past or present, and put the whole background part in it. Don't alternate the tenses, fourth graders.

2628:

I am only a casual fan of the Harry Potter series, so I am not equipped to rewrite these sections. Is anyone else up to it?

2501:

As the names are not canon, I think they should be deleted. Just wanted to see what others thought before I made the change.

2032: 2525:

Saying that, Quirrel was a separate entity, not Voldemort himself, he was just host to Voldemort who had lost his own body.

904: 403:

2) see above, this is handled in different articles, though it is possible to find comments by Rowling about the character.

2430: 2215: 1917: 1763: 1433: 120: 115: 89: 81: 76: 64: 59: 2893:

Also: It says towards the end that harry was made into a "seventh Horcrux", but he was number 8, if I remember correctly

1978: 2231:

have already stated, there is no way of receiving that information, unless J.K. Rowling were to give it to us herself.

2390: 1797:

for confirmation. Accordingly, a more neutral phrasing would be "flashback" or "expository dialogue" as appropriate.

1736:

It's good to see people actually excited about a GA. I've passed a few that haven't even had a comment. Nice work.

1484: 1327:

fictional data now is written in present, as required, and only historical real-life data is written in the past tense

1246:

IIRC, Rowling said in an interview that he taught multiple years at Hogwarts, but only taught Dark Arts for one year.

2502: 2360: 38: 1497:

There could be a section on the Lord Voldemort page with a link to the main article on Tom Riddle, similar to the

871: 2940: 418:

Hi, I am glad that you are so concerned, but I am sorry to say that your arguments are quite easy to dispose of.

289:

Neutral - Okay for a random article, but I am still not convinced this templates alone are enough for a GA or FA.

686: 3062:

Cut back the EXTREMELY BLOATED, UBER GEEKY "fictional biography" part to about 10% of its original length, per

2442: 2346: 2314: 2282: 2131: 2045: 1940: 1870: 1794: 1502: 1365: 1126: 916: 883: 2803:

Who changed the image again? The new one is actually a promotial poster. At least cut the film advertisement.

2101: 856:...well, I guess, etc etc. Can someone point out to me a fictional character article that is designated GA? 497:

In a GA, NOTHING can excuse lack of referencing. It is a 100% failsafe method of getting an article delisted.

2505: 2306: 2274: 1905: 2519:

It was Ian Hart, the same actor who played Quirrel. A mediocre actor if ever there was one if you ask me.

2458:

it says that The Guardian reported the opening of the book. Can somebody please find the source for that?

2177: 1809: 441: 2310: 2278: 2098: 1705: 1203: 1167: 1054: 193: 3027: 2894: 2860: 2560: 2459: 2073: 2022: 1837: 1744: 1704:, given that you opened up this Pandora's Box :)) or make suggestions should go there and get involved. 1678: 1403: 1287: 152: 3012: 2965: 2951: 2657: 1913: 1798: 2604: 2252: 2407:

26.00 minutes, observe and report back. Lord Voldemort seemed to return a year earlier than planned!

1822: 1727: 1577: 1545: 1269: 453: 327: 2937: 2643: 2545: 2339: 2191: 2141: 2055: 1950: 1880: 1847: 1526: 1375: 1212: 1136: 909: 876: 207: 47: 17: 2580: 2475: 2421: 2206: 1336:

Merged some parts of"Attributes and traits" section into the publication history and fictional bio

959:(trying to sell plot summaries as biographical data; in addition, wikipedia is not a plot summary) 445: 99: 2739: 2714: 2378: 2077: 1722:

Congratulations! I've just heard the good news. Have our project ever got any article passed FA?

1420: 1415:". O rly? Where did you get that idea from? Correct me if I'm mistaken, I am of the opinion that 1395: 218: 3076: 3041: 984: 937: 320: 294: 265: 232: 2723:

Hmm...not sure what you mean. The infobox image for Dumbledore potrays the film actor as well.

206:

death", thus Lord Flies(runs) from Death. It seems both viable linguistically and appropriate.

3092: 2777: 2724: 2672: 2426: 2211: 1757: 1714: 1701: 1692: 1649: 1459: 1427: 1345: 988: 980: 849: 690: 649: 589: 513: 472: 343: 3088: 3052:

status way back, I boldly restored part of the article to meet good article standards again.

1648:

Where did we get the names of Thomas and Mary Riddle? I don't remember those from the books.

1279: 353: 240: 2979: 2870:

good villains, there's not much we can say if they haven't read it. And we're talking about

1846:

I wouldn't read any article about a character from a book I haven't read, just to be safe.--

1739: 1673: 1455: 1283: 1193: 1031:

I think that the root of the problem is that the article is written with a perspective from

685:, hate citations and favour opinion over fact. OK, your choice, but be aware that there are 3069: 3063: 3057: 3037: 970: 963: 956: 952: 945: 682: 487: 475:– you will be surprised how much better this real-life POV is, much less nerdy, crufty and 468: 461: 449: 434: 427: 422: 310: 302: 298: 276: 269: 258: 254: 250: 246: 2804: 1723: 1480: 1183: 845: 357: 870:

article—it still has GA status. For more examples, look under the appropriate category

2875: 2685: 2374: 2329: 2136: 2127: 2123: 2050: 2041: 2037: 1945: 1936: 1932: 1875: 1866: 1862: 1658: 1630: 1604: 1595: 1559: 1416: 1391: 1370: 1361: 1357: 1157: 1131: 1122: 1118: 1088: 1036: 1023: 1013: 1003: 742: 730: 678: 574: 527: 404: 335: 163: 2989: 2912: 2834: 2756: 2571: 2488: 2408: 1471: 480: 3095: 3030: 3015: 2994: 2982: 2968: 2954: 2917: 2897: 2878: 2863: 2837: 2807: 2782: 2759: 2742: 2729: 2717: 2688: 2675: 2660: 2646: 2632: 2607: 2583: 2574: 2563: 2548: 2529: 2491: 2462: 2445: 2435: 2411: 2396: 2363: 2351: 2332: 2255: 2220: 2194: 2180: 2149: 2104: 2080: 2063: 2025: 1958: 1888: 1850: 1840: 1825: 1812: 1801: 1766: 1751: 1731: 1717: 1708: 1695: 1685: 1652: 1633: 1607: 1580: 1562: 1548: 1529: 1505: 1488: 1462: 1436: 1406: 1383: 1348: 1291: 1272: 1250: 1215: 1206: 1196: 1186: 1170: 1160: 1144: 1110: 1091: 1057: 1039: 1026: 1016: 1006: 991: 921: 898: 888: 860: 745: 733: 693: 652: 592: 530: 516: 407: 360: 346: 221: 210: 196: 166: 141: 3083: 3049: 2526: 1909: 1107: 895: 857: 491: 380: 138: 2294:

Perhaps Voldemort himself wrote this article? I know Dr.Doom wrote his too. -Pyro

2600:"Voldemort engaged in the battle and striked and smitened everyone in hsi reach" 1789:

verify this, if you speak Japanese, on the Japanese version of the same article.

2738:

It was recently changed. I was referring to the black-and-white drawing of him.

1498: 1451: 1247: 867: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

741:

originally presented, which seems to be precisely what those people object to.

2710: 2629: 2383: 2359:

I'd like to suggest removing Voldemort from the Fictional Dictators category.

1817:

You're wrong. In the Spanish Version, Tom Marvolo Riddle is translated as Tom

1476: 1443: 853: 245:

Broad: FAIL. The article fails to give real-life out-of-universe info, as of

2004:. He was born in London. I think that aptly fits the definition of the word 331: 2978:

Shouldn't the introduction start 'Lord Voldemort (né Tom Marvolo Riddle)'?

2121:

Hmm, well, I can buy that too. Anybody else have something to say on it? --

2911:

Harry was the sixth, Nagini the seventh, there was only seven, not eight.

3075:

Cut long, droning in-universe passages which are all unreferenced, as of

1447: 999: 1315: 1053:

critical opinions and theories from online sources are not accepted).

983:

from my side, but I utterly do not think this is a good article as of

3007: 2235:

This is an excerpt that Dumbledore describes about the Gaunt Family.

1308: 582: 239:

Well written: neutral. Very long-winded entry, could be better as of

1333:

made name section more concise; remove "Valdemar" blurb as of WP:NOR

1901:

What th' hell happened?!!! Lord Voldemort article has been erased!

202:

I strongly believe that it can be interpreted as "flight(or flies)

1973:, but this way I use up more of people's precious, precious time. 476: 316:

Add REAL-LIFE info! This is the best way to improve this article.

2907:

regained a rudimentary body, as long as the victim was subdued)

2456: 2165: 1426:"Lord Voldemort" is only something that Tom regrettably became. 2579:

The new picture is much better. Kudos to whoever put it there.

2476:

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,2126717,00.html

2246:

just as much as his son, and rather more than his daughter."'

1927: 512:

Sorry for the long essay, but I wanted to make myself clear. —

326:

If you want to know how all above is done properly, read e.g.

25: 1211:

Small nitpick: Voldemortplaced a jynx? Surely you mean jinx?

2597:

This article is poorly punctuated with even poorer grammar.

338:, which are both FAs. See the differences in tone and style? 272:, Voldemort is NOT born 1926, he was created by JKR in 1997. 2933:

wouldn't have desired that if occurrences led to trouble.

1413:

In the books, there is not made any difference between them

217:

house, Voldemort can fly, unassisted by broom or thestral.

2936:

I think it's safe to remove that blurb, then. Am I right?

615:

Okay, I here is the skeleton what how I would write this:

2903:

Correction, JKR said it was the dead of Bertha Jorkins.

1855:

I second that advice (I was sadly spoiled the ending of

1192:

We don't know if his years teaching were consecutive.

268:, not to speak a lack of real-life info. FYI, as of 3056:Established a firm out-of-universe POV again as of 588:

fictional canon dates. Hope I made my point clear.—

264:Verifiable: STRONG FAIL. No references at all, see 2701:again, or be with his parents, Sirius, and Lupin. 689:, and original research is strongly discouraged. — 3072:, point 7 (Knowledge (XXG) is not a plot summary) 1594:, but I would like to see the opinion of others. 1318:article, a HP article definitely in range of a GA 1314:I tried to emulate also the look-and-feel of the 293:Please improve. As of now, the article is (as of 2420:Easter egg…the appearance is not part of canon.— 1657:They are on the Gravestone in the fourth movie. 433:If you people cannot add info without violating 2522:Okay, and I didn't like him either by the way. 2487:Hope this is good enough and correcly sourced, 2015:Fictional characters who have committed treason 3011:"Volod-" means "ruler")... A "tyrant" then? -- 2964:It's spelt pathological... someone change it? 2373:Merger tags have been added (again-again?) to 2072:As for the treason part. I totally agree with 430:and still write genuine GA (and FA) articles. 8: 2924:Utilization of 'name charm' in the first war 2474:The text shown in the preview trailer read: 951:Firmly in-universe approach, thus violating 440:Voldy was NOT born in 1926. Voldy is not in 1330:add sourced interpretation section on Voldy 966:(especially “abilities” and “name” section) 944:Almost total lack of references, violating 494:already contains it, then please re-use it! 2923: 962:Abundance of original research, violating 287:STRONG FAIL. Lack of fair use rationales!! 2603:Abysmal but I have rectified some of it. 421:First of all, for characters of fiction, 1521:Let me just say that the article's name 330:. How this is done PERFECTLY, read e.g. 261:(Knowledge (XXG) is not a plot summary). 2874:favorite villain, not everyone elses'. 2402:Brief Appearance in Prisoner of Azcaban 2238:(Chapter 10, p. 212, American Version) 1344:unsourced statements as of of WP:NOR. — 1324:corrected lead as of WP:LEAD and WP:WAF 948:; plus existence of several "fact" tags 2482:"News?", asked the taller of the two. 1307:I tried to make the article look like 1035:the fictional Harry Potter universe.-- 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2496: 1713:D'uh :D Anyway, I will drop a line. — 356:has now been opened on this article. 7: 3001:Polish and Russian name translations 1303:WP:WAF). Please assume good faith. 1102:References to Order of Phoenix film 903:Well, you could try looking at FAs 483:of Star Wars: this is how to do it! 2988:Something like that sounds right. 24: 3036:Heavy de-geekification measures ( 2497:Voldemort's paternal grandparents 2265:Perhaps a little too melodramatic 1821:so it can fit the translation. -- 1022:ah, but which direction is that? 319:Reference, reference, reference! 323:(book cite) is your best friend. 98: 29: 2186:Comparisons and Interpretations 1691:CHAMPAAAAAGGGNNEE!!!! :DDDDDD — 1442:As a comparison, there is also 687:five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 3082:It is mildly amusing to see a 2570:expression would be better. -- 479:. Look at e.g. the article of 1: 2470:It was The Observer, found at 2171:Fictional character biography 2162:Fictional cursed characters? 1959:22:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 1889:03:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 1851:21:32, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 1841:21:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 1802:16:14, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 1767:17:06, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 1752:16:59, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 1732:16:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 1718:13:28, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 1709:12:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 1696:12:23, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 1686:01:42, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 1653:19:39, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 1171:15:25, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 1161:15:13, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 1145:07:01, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 1111:21:58, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 1027:08:07, 20 December 2006 (UTC) 1017:03:10, 20 December 2006 (UTC) 1007:09:21, 19 December 2006 (UTC) 992:08:18, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 746:08:02, 20 December 2006 (UTC) 734:21:32, 17 December 2006 (UTC) 694:16:34, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 653:15:55, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 593:15:17, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 531:14:53, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 517:08:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 460:old bad trick referred to in 408:19:59, 11 December 2006 (UTC) 361:17:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC) 347:15:55, 10 December 2006 (UTC) 227:In danger of losing GA status 2589:But...The suit is hot!-Pyro 2484:"The best," replied Snape.' 2002:Fictional people from London 1523:should be Tom Marvolo Riddle 1489:10:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC) 1463:10:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC) 1437:12:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC) 1407:11:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC) 1384:13:02, 5 February 2007 (UTC) 1349:08:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC) 1292:22:30, 26 January 2007 (UTC) 1273:22:12, 26 January 2007 (UTC) 3087:have been successful as of 2854:Favourite Literary Villian? 1207:09:45, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 1197:01:25, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 1187:01:23, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 1092:02:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 1058:01:28, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 1040:23:49, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 681:you write that you endorse 172:The name "Voldemort"--taboo 3111: 3096:15:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 3031:09:21, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 3016:22:34, 1 August 2007 (UTC) 2995:02:04, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 2918:02:03, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 2530:14:57, 2 August 2007 (UTC) 2195:19:18, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 2181:21:52, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 1661:21:30, 27 July 2007 (GMT) 1598:21:35, 27 July 2007 (GMT) 1251:05:33, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 677:By the way, Sandpiper, on 142:14:58, 2 August 2007 (UTC) 2983:17:57, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 2969:12:11, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 2955:19:31, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2941:08:07, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2898:09:36, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 2879:03:55, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2864:19:21, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 2838:06:42, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2808:02:07, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2783:15:43, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2760:07:55, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2743:14:48, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 2730:14:43, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 2718:14:40, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 2689:04:15, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 2676:16:52, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2661:23:59, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 2647:08:52, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 2633:01:00, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 2608:00:13, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 2584:18:34, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2575:06:11, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 2564:19:26, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 2549:21:59, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 2506:06:14, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 2492:23:55, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 2463:19:17, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 2446:03:17, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 2436:03:16, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 2412:02:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 2364:06:23, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 2256:01:19, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 2221:23:11, 16 June 2007 (UTC) 2200:Japanese anagram/whatever 2150:04:39, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 2105:22:21, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 2081:21:36, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 2064:04:48, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 2026:04:38, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 1813:03:16, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 1634:14:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 1608:04:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1581:20:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 1563:04:21, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 1549:12:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 1530:21:43, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 1506:03:13, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 1263:Suggestion for a rederict 1216:21:41, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 275:NPOV: FAIL. Far too much 222:17:59, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 211:21:39, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 167:23:38, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 2397:16:04, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 2352:15:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 2333:12:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 1826:03:35, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 1795:Exposition_(plot_device) 1423:are entirely different. 922:20:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 899:17:21, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 889:17:16, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 861:14:26, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 444:and does not fall under 393:second list of comments: 197:14:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC) 121:May 2006 – December 2006 2613:Deathly Hallows Content 188:"Voldemort" means what? 2885:Horcrux = Nagini Error 442:Category:Living people 116:July 2003 – April 2006 2503:Faithlessthewonderboy 2361:Faithlessthewonderboy 2226:Voldemort Family Tree 1784:Addition To Name List 42:of past discussions. 2900:SexyIrishLeprechaun 2511:Who Played him here? 1986:the category anyway 1278:Go ahead and do it, 579:real-life chronology 454:Category:1926 births 328:Donut (Red vs. Blue) 2443:Beep Beep Honk Honk 1979:Fictional immortals 1503:Beep Beep Honk Honk 1282:and all that jazz. 354:Good Article review 18:Talk:Lord Voldemort 2379:Tom Marvolo Riddle 1592:Tom Marvolo Riddle 1421:Tom Marvolo Riddle 1396:Tom Marvolo Riddle 288: 2434: 2394: 2323: 2309:comment added by 2291: 2277:comment added by 2219: 2021:Okay, that's it. 1922: 1908:comment added by 1450:(FA!) as well as 1290: 1233:should really be 981:Assume good faith 850:David Copperfield 683:original research 473:assume good faith 369:re your comments: 286: 95: 94: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3102: 2992: 2915: 2861:VorangorTheDemon 2561:ThanosMadTitan23 2451:opening of book? 2424: 2388: 2350: 2343: 2322: 2303: 2290: 2271: 2209: 2134: 2074:VolatileChemical 2048: 2023:VolatileChemical 1943: 1921: 1902: 1873: 1747: 1742: 1681: 1676: 1456:Anakin Skywalker 1368: 1339:General copyedit 1286: 1129: 920: 913: 887: 880: 102: 73: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3110: 3109: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3046: 3003: 2990: 2976: 2962: 2948: 2926: 2913: 2887: 2856: 2707: 2670: 2640: 2615: 2595: 2557: 2537: 2513: 2499: 2453: 2404: 2371: 2341: 2338: 2304: 2300: 2272: 2267: 2228: 2202: 2188: 2178:S W Is For Life 2173: 2132: 2046: 1967: 1941: 1903: 1899: 1871: 1833: 1823:Shadowy Crafter 1810:200.117.155.129 1786: 1745: 1740: 1679: 1674: 1667: 1646: 1578:Rhindle The Red 1546:Rhindle The Red 1399: 1366: 1300: 1270:Momoroxmysoxoff 1265: 1179: 1153: 1127: 1104: 934: 911: 908: 878: 875: 846:Sherlock Holmes 229: 190: 182: 174: 160: 149: 147:Learn Grammar!! 134: 129: 111: 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3108: 3106: 3080: 3079: 3073: 3066: 3060: 3045: 3034: 3020: 3002: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2975: 2972: 2961: 2960:"pathalogical" 2958: 2947: 2944: 2925: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2886: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2855: 2852: 2851: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2733: 2732: 2706: 2703: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2669: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2654: 2639: 2636: 2626: 2625: 2614: 2611: 2594: 2591: 2587: 2586: 2577: 2556: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2546:Rotten Venetic 2536: 2533: 2512: 2509: 2498: 2495: 2486: 2485: 2483: 2481: 2479: 2478: 2472: 2471: 2466: 2465: 2452: 2449: 2439: 2438: 2403: 2400: 2375:Lord Voldemort 2370: 2367: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2342:Arwen Undomiel 2311:81.145.241.247 2299: 2296: 2279:81.145.241.247 2266: 2263: 2249: 2234: 2227: 2224: 2201: 2198: 2187: 2184: 2172: 2169: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2067: 2066: 2019: 2018: 2010: 2009: 1997: 1996: 1966: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1898: 1897:What Happened? 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1848:CyberGhostface 1832: 1829: 1819:Sorvolo Ryddle 1806: 1785: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1706:Michaelsanders 1666: 1663: 1645: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1611: 1610: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1552: 1551: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1527:Rotten Venetic 1513: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1492: 1491: 1466: 1465: 1417:Lord Voldemort 1398: 1392:Lord Voldemort 1388: 1387: 1386: 1341: 1340: 1337: 1334: 1331: 1328: 1325: 1322: 1319: 1312: 1299: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1264: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1228: 1225: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1213:Rotten Venetic 1204:Michaelsanders 1178: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1168:Michaelsanders 1152: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1103: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1055:Michaelsanders 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1010: 1009: 975: 974: 967: 960: 949: 933: 932:Delisted as GA 930: 929: 928: 927: 926: 925: 924: 912:Arwen Undomiel 879:Arwen Undomiel 842: 841: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 826: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 807: 767: 765: 764: 763: 762: 761: 760: 759: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 700: 679:your user page 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 646: 640: 637: 634: 631: 628: 622: 616: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 595: 575:Storm (comics) 562: 561: 560: 559: 558: 557: 556: 555: 554: 553: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 523: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 499: 498: 495: 484: 465: 457: 438: 431: 411: 410: 401: 397: 396: 395: 394: 388: 387: 384: 377: 373: 372: 371: 370: 364: 363: 340: 339: 336:Jabba the Hutt 324: 317: 314: 291: 290: 283: 280: 273: 262: 243: 228: 225: 214: 213: 208:Rotten Venetic 194:69.152.225.217 189: 186: 181: 178: 173: 170: 159: 156: 148: 145: 133: 132:Voldemort Wand 130: 128: 127: 125: 123: 118: 112: 103: 97: 96: 93: 92: 87: 84: 79: 74: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3107: 3098: 3097: 3094: 3090: 3085: 3078: 3074: 3071: 3067: 3065: 3061: 3059: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3051: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3033: 3032: 3029: 3028:62.111.158.66 3025: 3021: 3018: 3017: 3014: 3009: 3006:reference to 3000: 2996: 2993: 2987: 2986: 2985: 2984: 2981: 2973: 2971: 2970: 2967: 2959: 2957: 2956: 2953: 2945: 2943: 2942: 2939: 2934: 2930: 2919: 2916: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2904: 2901: 2899: 2896: 2895:89.100.30.199 2891: 2884: 2880: 2877: 2873: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2862: 2853: 2839: 2836: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2809: 2806: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2784: 2781: 2780: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2761: 2758: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2744: 2741: 2740:Supertigerman 2737: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2731: 2728: 2727: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2716: 2715:Supertigerman 2712: 2704: 2702: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2687: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2677: 2674: 2667: 2662: 2659: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2645: 2637: 2635: 2634: 2631: 2624: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2612: 2610: 2609: 2606: 2601: 2598: 2592: 2590: 2585: 2582: 2578: 2576: 2573: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2562: 2554: 2550: 2547: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2534: 2532: 2531: 2528: 2523: 2520: 2517: 2510: 2508: 2507: 2504: 2494: 2493: 2490: 2477: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2464: 2461: 2460:69.244.234.39 2457: 2450: 2448: 2447: 2444: 2437: 2432: 2428: 2423: 2419: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2410: 2401: 2399: 2398: 2393: 2392: 2386: 2385: 2380: 2376: 2369:Merger again? 2368: 2366: 2365: 2362: 2353: 2349: 2348: 2345: 2344: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2331: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2297: 2295: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2264: 2262: 2258: 2257: 2254: 2247: 2244: 2239: 2236: 2232: 2225: 2223: 2222: 2217: 2213: 2208: 2199: 2197: 2196: 2193: 2185: 2183: 2182: 2179: 2170: 2168: 2167: 2163: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2138: 2135: 2129: 2126: 2125: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2106: 2103: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2082: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2053: 2052: 2049: 2043: 2040: 2039: 2034: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2024: 2016: 2012: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1998: 1994: 1989: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1972: 1964: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1947: 1944: 1938: 1935: 1934: 1929: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1896: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1877: 1874: 1868: 1865: 1864: 1858: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1849: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1839: 1838:12.150.23.178 1830: 1828: 1827: 1824: 1820: 1815: 1814: 1811: 1804: 1803: 1800: 1796: 1790: 1783: 1768: 1765: 1762: 1760: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1743: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1716: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1694: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1677: 1664: 1662: 1660: 1655: 1654: 1651: 1643: 1635: 1632: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1609: 1606: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1597: 1593: 1582: 1579: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1564: 1561: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1550: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1538: 1531: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1507: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1473: 1472:Riddle family 1468: 1467: 1464: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1435: 1432: 1430: 1424: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1409: 1408: 1405: 1404:130.236.60.35 1397: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1372: 1369: 1363: 1360: 1359: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1347: 1338: 1335: 1332: 1329: 1326: 1323: 1320: 1317: 1313: 1310: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1298:Major rewrite 1297: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1271: 1262: 1252: 1249: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1232: 1226: 1217: 1214: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1205: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1195: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1185: 1176: 1172: 1169: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1159: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1133: 1130: 1124: 1121: 1120: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1109: 1101: 1093: 1090: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1059: 1056: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1041: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1025: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1015: 1008: 1005: 1001: 996: 995: 994: 993: 990: 986: 982: 978: 972: 968: 965: 961: 958: 954: 950: 947: 943: 942: 941: 939: 931: 923: 919: 918: 915: 914: 906: 902: 901: 900: 897: 892: 891: 890: 886: 885: 882: 881: 873: 869: 868:Darth Vader's 865: 864: 863: 862: 859: 855: 851: 847: 804: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 772: 771: 770: 769: 768: 747: 744: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 732: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 697: 696: 695: 692: 688: 684: 680: 676: 675: 674: 673: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 667: 666: 665: 654: 651: 647: 644: 641: 638: 635: 632: 629: 626: 623: 620: 617: 614: 613: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 594: 591: 584: 580: 576: 572: 571: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 550: 549: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 532: 529: 524: 520: 519: 518: 515: 511: 510: 509: 508: 507: 506: 496: 493: 489: 485: 482: 481:Padme Amidala 478: 474: 470: 466: 463: 458: 455: 451: 447: 443: 439: 436: 432: 429: 424: 420: 419: 417: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 409: 406: 402: 399: 398: 392: 391: 390: 389: 385: 382: 378: 375: 374: 368: 367: 366: 365: 362: 359: 355: 351: 350: 349: 348: 345: 337: 333: 329: 325: 322: 318: 315: 312: 308: 307: 306: 304: 300: 296: 284: 282:Stable: pass. 281: 278: 274: 271: 267: 263: 260: 256: 252: 248: 244: 242: 238: 237: 236: 234: 226: 224: 223: 220: 212: 209: 205: 201: 200: 199: 198: 195: 187: 185: 180:Pronunciation 179: 177: 171: 169: 168: 165: 157: 155: 154: 153:216.165.12.32 146: 144: 143: 140: 131: 126: 124: 122: 119: 117: 114: 113: 110: 109: 108: 101: 91: 88: 85: 83: 80: 78: 75: 72: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3093:Onomatopoeia 3084:good article 3081: 3050:good article 3047: 3022: 3019: 3013:89.78.33.251 3004: 2977: 2966:210.1.193.29 2963: 2952:116.14.52.26 2949: 2946:Name "curse" 2935: 2931: 2927: 2905: 2902: 2892: 2888: 2871: 2857: 2778: 2725: 2708: 2699: 2673:Poemisaglock 2671: 2658:86.144.174.9 2641: 2627: 2622: 2616: 2602: 2599: 2596: 2588: 2558: 2538: 2524: 2521: 2518: 2514: 2500: 2473: 2454: 2440: 2417: 2405: 2389: 2382: 2372: 2358: 2347: 2340: 2301: 2293: 2268: 2259: 2248: 2242: 2240: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2203: 2189: 2174: 2164: 2160: 2130: 2122: 2094: 2044: 2036: 2020: 2005: 1992: 1987: 1982: 1970: 1968: 1939: 1931: 1900: 1869: 1861: 1856: 1834: 1831:Plot Spoiler 1818: 1816: 1805: 1799:220.31.16.20 1791: 1787: 1758: 1738: 1737: 1715:Onomatopoeia 1702:Onomatopoeia 1693:Onomatopoeia 1672: 1671: 1668: 1656: 1650:Bigblawbenjr 1647: 1644:Grandparents 1591: 1589: 1541: 1522: 1512: 1460:Onomatopoeia 1428: 1425: 1412: 1410: 1400: 1364: 1356: 1346:Onomatopoeia 1342: 1301: 1266: 1234: 1230: 1227: 1224: 1180: 1154: 1125: 1117: 1105: 1032: 1011: 989:Onomatopoeia 979: 976: 935: 917: 910: 884: 877: 848:...sort of, 843: 766: 691:Onomatopoeia 650:Onomatopoeia 642: 624: 618: 590:Onomatopoeia 578: 514:Onomatopoeia 492:Harry Potter 381:Harry Potter 344:Onomatopoeia 341: 292: 230: 215: 203: 191: 183: 175: 161: 150: 135: 106: 104: 70: 43: 37: 2605:Valentina16 2593:Punctuation 2305:—Preceding 2273:—Preceding 2253:Heather1011 2205:Riddle"...— 1965:Cat sorting 1904:—Preceding 1499:Darth Vader 1452:Darth Vader 1284:John Reaves 1194:John Reaves 1087:relevent.-- 279:for a pass. 36:This is an 2805:Lord Opeth 2711:Dumbledore 2653:motorbike. 2535:Allegiance 2455:If you go 2298:Categories 2000:Secondly: 1724:Causesobad 1444:Clark Kent 1184:AstoVidatu 854:Tom Sawyer 645:(2005) ... 358:Homestarmy 2938:Organichu 2876:Ellethwen 2686:Ellethwen 2644:Olosnecaj 2418:Extremely 2330:HonestTom 2013:Thirdly: 1977:Firstly: 1665:Passed GA 1659:Pachoolao 1631:Ellethwen 1605:Ellethwen 1596:Pachoolao 1560:Ellethwen 1454:(GA) and 1235:Voldemort 1231:Voldeomrt 1158:Sandpiper 1151:Page Name 1089:SmokeyJoe 1073:universe. 1037:SmokeyJoe 1024:Sandpiper 1014:SmokeyJoe 1004:Sandpiper 852:...nope, 743:Sandpiper 731:Sandpiper 528:Sandpiper 446:WP:LIVING 405:Sandpiper 332:Palpatine 164:Bilbo1507 90:Archive 7 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 71:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 3077:WP:WIAGA 3042:WP:WIAGA 2991:ϲнʌɴɗɩєʀ 2914:ϲнʌɴɗɩєʀ 2835:Sauron18 2757:Sauron18 2572:Sauron18 2489:T saston 2431:contribs 2422:Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ 2409:T saston 2391:contribs 2319:contribs 2307:unsigned 2287:contribs 2275:unsigned 2216:contribs 2207:Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ 2192:Terraxos 1930:time. -- 1918:contribs 1906:unsigned 1756:Cheers! 1485:contribs 1448:Superman 1116:Done. -- 1000:Goldmoon 985:WP:WIAGA 938:WP:WIAGA 321:WP:CITET 295:WP:WIAGA 285:Images: 266:WP:CITET 233:WP:WIAGA 158:Spelling 107:Archives 3089:WP:SNOW 2980:The One 2779:Peacent 2726:Peacent 2705:Picture 2581:Piggins 2555:Picture 2527:Baaleos 2102:Sanders 2099:Michael 2095:treason 2093:Surely 1910:Ghadden 1808:franshu 1542:Chamber 1316:Horcrux 1280:be bold 1108:Valters 896:Ccrashh 858:Ccrashh 241:WP:LEAD 139:Baaleos 39:archive 3070:WP:NOT 3064:WP:WAF 3058:WP:WAF 3038:WP:WAF 3008:Woland 2638:Flying 2078:Zazzer 1857:Narnia 1746:Day349 1680:Day349 1390:Merge 1309:Batman 1288:(talk) 1248:Ophois 1156:this? 1033:inside 971:WP:WAF 964:WP:NOR 957:WP:NOT 953:WP:WAF 946:WP:NOR 643:Book 6 625:Book 2 619:Book 1 583:retcon 552:worse. 488:WP:WAF 469:WP:WAF 462:WP:WAF 450:WP:BIO 435:WP:NOR 428:WP:WAF 423:WP:WAF 311:WP:WAF 303:WP:NOT 299:WP:WAF 277:WP:NOR 270:WP:WAF 259:WP:NOT 255:WP:NOR 251:WP:WAF 247:WP:WAF 219:Mrhp57 2872:their 2668:Error 2630:Brash 2384:T-dot 1988:until 1971:after 1741:Dooms 1675:Dooms 1477:T-dot 1394:with 1177:Error 587:: --> 586:: --> 477:otaku 467:That 309:Read 16:< 2974:Name 2427:talk 2377:and 2315:talk 2283:talk 2212:talk 2166:Anon 2033:here 2006:from 1914:talk 1764:ceNT 1728:Talk 1481:Talk 1446:and 1434:ceNT 1419:and 1402:HBT. 955:and 905:here 872:here 866:Try 301:and 257:and 204:from 3091:. — 2387:( / 2148:|| 2137:del 2124:Fbv 2062:|| 2051:del 2038:Fbv 1993:any 1983:not 1957:|| 1946:del 1933:Fbv 1928:UTC 1887:|| 1876:del 1863:Fbv 1726:→ ( 1382:|| 1371:del 1358:Fbv 1143:|| 1132:del 1119:Fbv 940:): 907:. 639:... 636:... 633:... 630:... 452:or 3040:, 2656:-- 2429:• 2395:) 2321:) 2317:• 2289:) 2285:• 2214:• 2146:☛c 2144:/ 2142:☑t 2140:/ 2128:65 2060:☛c 2058:/ 2056:☑t 2054:/ 2042:65 1955:☛c 1953:/ 1951:☑t 1949:/ 1937:65 1920:) 1916:• 1885:☛c 1883:/ 1881:☑t 1879:/ 1867:65 1860:-- 1761:ea 1730:) 1487:) 1483:| 1431:ea 1380:☛c 1378:/ 1376:☑t 1374:/ 1362:65 1355:-- 1182:-- 1141:☛c 1139:/ 1137:☑t 1135:/ 1123:65 874:. 448:, 352:A 334:, 297:, 253:, 235:: 86:→ 3044:) 2663:. 2433:) 2425:( 2313:( 2281:( 2218:) 2210:( 2133:e 2047:e 2008:. 1942:e 1912:( 1872:e 1759:P 1479:( 1458:— 1429:P 1411:" 1367:e 1128:e 973:) 648:— 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index