220:
scientific achievements. Yet I look at his publication list and see a tremendous amount of technical material that he's put out over the last three decades, in addition to a lot of popular stuff in between. Is any of it notable? This is why an expert is needed. We can't have an article stating foremost that he's "a theoretical physicist" and then not include a damn thing about his actual work. And just to clarify, I'm not saying this as thinly veiled criticism. I like the guy, (you can guess my opinions by looking at my edit history) so I would like to include something more persuasive here about what makes him a notable physicist, assuming he is one. --
205:, which has in turn been the wellspring of his subsequent influence as a public intellectual, academic administrator, and public science policy advisor. Many of the articles listed in his complete publications list are popular rather than scientific, but at least a couple hundred of them are hardcore cosmology and theoretical physics research/reviews. I'm going to try to build a section into the article detailing his scientific work, because at the moment the article makes it difficult to understand why he's such a highly regarded and awarded physicist. If anyone would care to assist in this project, (in particular experts?) please do. --
596:. The criticism has already happened and has been documented. Whether his rumor about the GW detection is true or not is not relevant here. Even if it is true, he would still have received significant criticism for announcing this news early and not leaving that to the discoverers. His rumor has received a lot of attention (I only selected two sources) so I think a small section on this is justified. Just the fact that his criticism happened in the last 6 months is in itself no reason to leave it out based on
31:
286:"In 2006, Krauss led the initiative for the no-confidence vote against Case Western Reserve University's president Edward M. Hundert and provost Anderson by the College of Arts and Sciences faculty. On March 2, 2006, both no-confidence votes were carried: 131–44 against Hundert and 97–68 against Anderson."
337:
The early life section contains the sentence, "He was reared in a Jewish household." I've changed the word 'reared' to 'raised.' To some people only animals are reared while raised is pretty much accepted everywhere. Thus to some groups that original wording might be a little offensive. I consider it
687:
We really do have to be careful about these things. The reason I brought up recentism in addition to BLP, is that it really is too soon in terms of sources to make this an encyclopedic claim. Keep in mind that he just reported what he heard, so if true, it could also be that someone (or more than
219:
My real question is this: What significant discoveries has Krauss made or contributed to? Either he hasn't really discovered much, or he's the most modest guy in the universe, because in spite of his tremendous output, none of the biographies I find of the guy clearly state anything about his
142:
Krauss states in this article, "My practice as a scientist is atheistic. That is to say, when I set up an experiment I assume that no god, angel or devil is going to interfere with its course; and this assumption has been justified by such success as I have achieved in my professional career. I
174:
is a "scientific hypothesis," it is the opinion of many others that it is an unscientific powerplay intended to insert ultra-conservative
Protestant religious dogmas into public school education. Lawrence Krauss's biography is hardly the place to debate such a complicated issue.
169:
If you feel that this article has inappropriate liberal point of view, I encourage you to try to improve it, but adding the vague pejorative term "leftist" fails to accomplish that. Furthermore, although it may be the opinion of some that
692:. As of now (things could change), it would be against policy to add this section as criticism. After the announcement on Feb 11, 2016, and depending on the coverage, perhaps the discussion of rumors would be appropriate in
182:"? If you want this article to criticize Krauss's opposition to intelligent design, the way to do this is to find reliable sources that you can quote, as well as balancing sources expressing the opposite point of view.
619:
which explains that such sections are rarely helpful. If there is encyclopedic information it should be integrated into the existing text because articles should not unduly draw attention to what critics have claimed.
672:
As I already mentioned above, the criticism is not about whether the rumor is false of correct. He may be right, but he'd still have 'stolen some of the glory' (to quote some criticism) of the people doing the work.
738:
The consensus a bit further down this page is that people are waiting for a WP:RS other than BuzzFeed to vet some of the claims in BuzzFeed article. The
Gizmodo article does not address the validity of claims.
315:
It might be possible that Krauss was born in NYC, but supposedly he spent a lot of his childhood in
Calgary, Alberta, or at least that is what he told me. Is this wrong? Maybe someone should ask him. --
377:
Later, in the wider context of the "wrongness" of homosexuality, the audience protested, when Krauss answered the question "Why is incest wrong?" with "It is not clear to me that it is wrong",
366:
Later, in the wider context of the "wrongness" of homosexuality, the audience protested, when Krauss answered the question "Why is incest wrong?" with "It is not clear to me that it is wrong",
91:
I'm moving this line from the main page as I'm pretty sure it's vandalism- "He likes to wear black turtlenecks, as shown in his picture." In the odd chance it's not, give a holler.
234:
As of today, the most notable thing he has done is to personally co-opt ~20,000 man-years of work by LIGO scientists. I expect it will stand as the high water mark of his career.
260:
This is just silly. What does it even mean? What is the impact of superstition in pop culture? What is the impact of religion in pop culture? How could one work to reduce them?
468:
the "it" falsely suggests that this quote refers to incest in general while, in the context of the debate, in fact, it refers to the example of an incest case given by him,
114:
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class.
84:
973:
969:
955:
843:
839:
825:
178:
Also, did you really mean to say that Krauss opposes intelligent design "as a result of his involvement on the issue with the state school board of
638:. I'll look more carefully into that essay and talk page, but it is good to know there are guidelines saying such section are preferably left out.
241:
472:"rational arguments" in the actual debate does not refer to arguments supporting an absolute incest taboo but rather to arguments against
941:
931:
296:
201:
It seems to me that much of Krauss's notability comes from his impressive scientific output complemented by his teaching, referenced
150:
951:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
821:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
267:
811:
561:
497:
424:
592:
source says he has been criticized by 3 different astronomers/physicists, all named: Michael
Merrifield, Erik Mamajek, and
775:
720:
532:
saying that he wouldn't recommend it but may listen to rational arguments concerning the objective morality of such acts.
484:
saying that he wouldn't recommend it but may listen to rational arguments concerning the objective morality of such acts.
450:
saying that he wouldn't recommend it but may listen to rational arguments concerning the objective morality of such acts.
398:
saying that he wouldn't recommend it but may listen to rational arguments concerning the objective morality of such acts.
379:
saying that he wouldn't recommend it but may listen to rational arguments concerning the objective morality of such acts.
1016:
921:
886:
76:
705:
663:
654:
I would also add that the rumor has not even played out yet. His rumor might be correct and that is the reason for
38:
972:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
842:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
689:
616:
245:
187:
553:
Please note that an adjacent REF contains a youtube video, pointing to the exact start of the "incest" debate.
1007:
913:
877:
803:
744:
413:
krauss in his statement does not use the word objective nor objective morality, usually used by apologetics
324:
300:
154:
909:
343:
143:
should therefore be intellectually dishonest if I were not also atheistic in the affairs of the world. "
991:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
979:
861:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
849:
701:
659:
579:
271:
225:
210:
128:
912:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
802:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
658:. Maybe, if his tweets become an essential part of his notability, then criticism could be included. --
92:
942:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070929022056/http://www.gravityresearchfoundation.org/winners_year.html
932:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070929022056/http://www.gravityresearchfoundation.org/winners_year.html
763:
593:
557:
493:
420:
292:
263:
237:
146:
47:
17:
655:
597:
183:
115:
905:
795:
740:
625:
565:
544:
501:
428:
171:
976:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
846:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
992:
862:
101:
771:
697:
678:
643:
605:
461:
for a reason, as the term is exclusively used by his opponent and theist apologists in general
339:
945:
935:
812:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110608234526/http://www.nchum.org/who-we-are/the-professoriate
728:
221:
206:
999:
869:
320:
139:
338:
a minor change but didn't mark it as one so that it isn't overlooked if people disagree.
958:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
828:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1021:
998:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
891:
868:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
779:
748:
732:
709:
682:
667:
647:
629:
609:
548:
347:
332:
304:
275:
249:
229:
214:
191:
158:
132:
118:
104:
95:
922:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110726073048/http://www.ph.utexas.edu/oakes/krauss.html
635:
621:
540:
124:
123:
I can't see anything proving that he's an agnostic. What's your opinion about this?--
815:
465:
in the debate he uses the terms: "absolute condemnation", "absolutely morally wrong"
100:
It may be at least partly true, but not to an excessive degree. It's certainly NN.
767:
674:
639:
601:
256:"and works to reduce the impact of superstition and religious dogma in pop culture"
723:
his appearance or affiliation, I think it's an appropriate topic for the moment. -
965:
835:
724:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
964:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
834:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
316:
925:
202:
688:
one) could not keep their mouth shut. Also, he is not the only source of
588:
a criticism section I added. What do you mean by 'too early to know'? The
353:"objective morality" - incest debate with Tzortis - in "Atheist activism"
518:
and gave an example case, where a simple answer may not be satisfactory.
489:
is a "gross" misrepresentation of Krauss' position and the actual debate
404:
and gave an example case, where a simple answer may not be satisfactory.
368:
and gave an example case, where a simple answer may not be satisfactory.
289:
This needs a citation. Anderson? Anderson who? There's no first name.
693:
179:
25:
476:
an absolute incest taboo in the context of the given example
946:
http://www.gravityresearchfoundation.org/winners_year.html
936:
http://www.gravityresearchfoundation.org/winners_year.html
916:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
806:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
409:
the NEW-edit was accompanied with the following comment:
759:
Shouldn't there be a pronunciation guide for "Krauss"?
537:
please provide a "clear" factually correct alternative.
799:
585:
140:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124597314928257169.html
968:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
838:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
816:http://www.nchum.org/who-we-are/the-professoriate
463:Krauss does not "believe" in objective morality
85:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/Lawrence M. Krauss
954:This message was posted before February 2018.
824:This message was posted before February 2018.
165:Disagreement on POV, others invited to comment
529:
515:
481:
447:
411:
394:
386:
375:
364:
8:
926:http://www.ph.utexas.edu/oakes/krauss.html
794:I have just modified one external link on
555:
491:
418:
235:
904:I have just modified 3 external links on
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
634:Thanks for the helpful explanation,
388:revert unclear sentence to original
282:Citation and more information needed
24:
908:. Please take a moment to review
798:. Please take a moment to review
392:original and "unclear" sentence:
696:. But, this is getting a little
29:
719:A number of organizations have
527:, compared to factually false:
373:was "corrected", reverted to:
197:Scientific Work/Experts needed
1:
1022:01:00, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
749:22:51, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
733:22:34, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
456:Krauss does NOT use the term
276:13:25, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
119:09:58, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
710:05:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
683:01:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
668:01:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
648:01:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
630:01:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
610:00:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
250:16:36, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
77:Knowledge:Votes for deletion
333:02:58, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
305:09:14, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
230:06:05, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
215:05:18, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
1037:
985:(last update: 5 June 2024)
901:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
855:(last update: 5 June 2024)
791:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
222:Grapplequip (formerly LAR)
207:Grapplequip (formerly LAR)
192:21:48, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
105:03:45, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
96:00:55, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
780:16:16, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
348:17:52, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
133:17:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
79:and the consensus was to
892:15:42, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
755:Pronunciation of surname
549:21:52, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
159:21:30, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
110:WikiProject class rating
75:This page was listed on
897:External links modified
787:External links modified
535:
521:
487:
453:
415:
407:
390:
382:
371:
568:) 21:52, 12 May 2015
504:) 21:52, 12 May 2015
431:) 21:52, 12 May 2015
42:of past discussions.
966:regular verification
836:regular verification
445:What is wrong with:
362:The following text:
18:Talk:Lawrence Krauss
956:After February 2018
826:After February 2018
311:Early personal life
1010:InternetArchiveBot
961:InternetArchiveBot
906:Lawrence M. Krauss
880:InternetArchiveBot
831:InternetArchiveBot
796:Lawrence M. Krauss
458:objective morality
172:intelligent design
986:
856:
783:
766:comment added by
594:Gabriela González
573:Criticism section
569:
560:comment added by
513:if you hold that
505:
496:comment added by
432:
423:comment added by
328:
295:comment added by
266:comment added by
252:
240:comment added by
149:comment added by
67:
66:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1028:
1020:
1011:
984:
983:
962:
890:
881:
854:
853:
832:
782:
760:
702:I am One of Many
660:I am One of Many
583:
580:I am One of Many
479:in other words:
329:
326:
307:
278:
161:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1036:
1035:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1014:
1009:
977:
970:have permission
960:
914:this simple FaQ
899:
884:
879:
847:
840:have permission
830:
804:this simple FaQ
789:
761:
757:
698:crystal ballish
577:
575:
511:
443:
438:
360:
355:
325:
313:
290:
284:
261:
258:
199:
167:
144:
112:
72:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1034:
1032:
1004:
1003:
996:
949:
948:
940:Added archive
938:
930:Added archive
928:
920:Added archive
898:
895:
874:
873:
866:
819:
818:
810:Added archive
788:
785:
756:
753:
752:
751:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
712:
652:
651:
650:
615:See the essay
574:
571:
554:
510:
507:
490:
474:
473:
470:
469:
466:
464:
462:
460:
442:
439:
437:
434:
417:
359:
356:
354:
351:
312:
309:
283:
280:
257:
254:
242:131.215.115.31
198:
195:
184:betsythedevine
166:
163:
137:
116:BetacommandBot
111:
108:
89:
71:
68:
65:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1033:
1024:
1023:
1018:
1013:
1012:
1001:
997:
994:
990:
989:
988:
981:
975:
971:
967:
963:
957:
952:
947:
943:
939:
937:
933:
929:
927:
923:
919:
918:
917:
915:
911:
907:
902:
896:
894:
893:
888:
883:
882:
871:
867:
864:
860:
859:
858:
851:
845:
841:
837:
833:
827:
822:
817:
813:
809:
808:
807:
805:
801:
797:
792:
786:
784:
781:
777:
773:
769:
765:
754:
750:
746:
742:
741:HouseOfChange
737:
736:
735:
734:
730:
726:
722:
711:
707:
703:
699:
695:
691:
686:
685:
684:
680:
676:
671:
670:
669:
665:
661:
657:
653:
649:
645:
641:
637:
633:
632:
631:
627:
623:
618:
614:
613:
612:
611:
607:
603:
599:
595:
591:
587:
581:
572:
570:
567:
563:
559:
551:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
533:
528:
526:
520:
519:
514:
508:
506:
503:
499:
495:
486:
485:
480:
477:
471:
467:
459:
455:
454:
452:
451:
446:
440:
435:
433:
430:
426:
422:
414:
410:
406:
405:
400:
399:
393:
389:
385:
381:
380:
374:
370:
369:
363:
357:
352:
350:
349:
345:
341:
335:
334:
330:
322:
318:
310:
308:
306:
302:
298:
294:
287:
281:
279:
277:
273:
269:
265:
255:
253:
251:
247:
243:
239:
232:
231:
227:
223:
217:
216:
212:
208:
204:
196:
194:
193:
189:
185:
181:
176:
173:
164:
162:
160:
156:
152:
148:
141:
135:
134:
130:
126:
121:
120:
117:
109:
107:
106:
103:
98:
97:
94:
88:
87:
86:
82:
78:
69:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1008:
1005:
980:source check
959:
953:
950:
903:
900:
878:
875:
850:source check
829:
823:
820:
793:
790:
762:— Preceding
758:
718:
656:WP:RECENTISM
617:WT:Criticism
598:WP:RECENTISM
589:
576:
556:— Preceding
552:
539:
536:
531:
530:
524:
522:
517:
516:
512:
492:— Preceding
488:
483:
482:
478:
475:
457:
449:
448:
444:
419:— Preceding
416:
412:
408:
403:
401:
397:
395:
391:
387:
384:commenting:
383:
378:
376:
372:
367:
365:
361:
340:MeDrewNotYou
336:
314:
297:69.77.247.60
291:— Preceding
288:
285:
262:— Preceding
259:
236:— Preceding
233:
218:
200:
177:
168:
151:24.248.3.242
136:
122:
113:
99:
93:Andromeda321
90:
80:
74:
73:
60:
43:
37:
268:88.97.18.12
145:—Preceding
138:@Starnold:
36:This is an
1017:Report bug
887:Report bug
1000:this tool
993:this tool
870:this tool
863:this tool
721:cancelled
436:Arguments
61:Archive 1
1006:Cheers.—
876:Cheers.—
776:contribs
764:unsigned
636:Johnuniq
622:Johnuniq
562:Quessler
558:unsigned
541:Quessler
498:Quessler
494:unsigned
425:Quessler
421:unsigned
293:unsigned
264:unsigned
238:unsigned
147:unsigned
125:Starnold
70:Untitled
910:my edit
800:my edit
768:Bearsca
675:Gap9551
640:Gap9551
602:Gap9551
590:Science
586:removed
525:unclear
441:Content
39:archive
725:Reagle
690:rumors
83:: see
402:NEW:
396:OLD:
358:Facts
317:Filll
16:<
772:talk
745:talk
729:talk
706:talk
700:. --
694:LIGO
679:talk
664:talk
644:talk
626:talk
606:talk
584:you
566:talk
545:talk
509:Form
502:talk
429:talk
344:talk
321:talk
301:talk
272:talk
246:talk
226:talk
211:talk
203:here
188:talk
180:Ohio
155:talk
129:talk
102:Gjc8
81:keep
974:RfC
944:to
934:to
924:to
844:RfC
814:to
523:is
327:wpc
987:.
982:}}
978:{{
857:.
852:}}
848:{{
778:)
774:•
747:)
731:)
708:)
681:)
666:)
646:)
628:)
608:)
600:.
547:)
346:)
331:)
323:|
303:)
274:)
248:)
228:)
213:)
190:)
157:)
131:)
1019:)
1015:(
1002:.
995:.
889:)
885:(
872:.
865:.
770:(
743:(
727:(
704:(
677:(
662:(
642:(
624:(
604:(
582::
578:@
564:(
543:(
500:(
427:(
342:(
319:(
299:(
270:(
244:(
224:(
209:(
186:(
153:(
127:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.