554:
means of payment. So, if your friend owes you $ 1000 and you made no agreement at the time the debt was incurred that a $ 1000 bill was not acceptable then, in fact, you must accept the $ 1000 bill or risk forfeiting the debt. (If you press your friend for repayment in another form, your friend can ask a court to extinguish the debt if you won't accept the legal tender bill.) However, it is perfectly acceptable for a business to limit your payment options as part of the process of contracting the debt. For example, McDonald's can say "hamburgers for sale as long as you don't pay in bills larger than $ 20" - the idea being that how you pay is part of the deal. But they have to let you know at the time of the purchase that not just any form of payment is acceptable. --
1854:
there was no such issue. The $ 500 section contains the only reference (unsourced) I was able to find on the internet to a small-size $ 500 note nicknamed a “watermelon note.” Correct use would be for the $ 100 1890 and $ 1,000 1890 Treasury notes (Watermelon and Grand
Watermelon, respectively). The $ 1,000 section states that exactly 165,372 notes were known to exist in 2009. This is an impossible figure to confirm (from a somewhat questionable source to begin with). One part of the $ 10,000 section comes very close to a copyvio (despite being sourced) when talking about the Binion’s hoard of notes. Will add additional information, citations and images over the next 24-48 hours.--
1638:
are the money in our pockets – and are in general circulation in this country and abroad in $ 1, $ 2, $ 5, $ 10, $ 20, $ 50, and $ 100 denominations. It would appear that there should be no confusion between the phony notes and legitimate U.S. currency. However, fraudsters often falsely claim that the altered
Federal Reserve Notes that they hold are somehow very special (for example, they are part of a secret trove of notes issued by the Federal Reserve under unusual circumstances that have been hidden for decades in secret locations abroad) and are not known to the public because they are so secret. The fraudulent notes – one example of which is set forth above – are worthless.2
1153:
mid 1970s I wouldn't be given its inflation adjusted value. There maybe function in quoting appraised value to collectors, but purchasing power equivalent is kind of a red herring. Also this 'value' is mentioned twice in the article, first as a stand alone section and then again with each individual note's section. If it truly is of educational value and more than just trivia it should be consolidated, having it mentioned more than once seems inappropriate. Also, where does this value come from? If it is of serious value its source should be listed.
1086:
222:
74:
212:
185:
53:
1215:
hearing the commentary for Sarah
Michelle Gellar's movie, uh, whose name I can't recall for now, the director said that he was annoyed when he saw obviously fake money being used in movies, so he kept real cash in a safe, for use in such scenes as when SMG's character is rolling around in the cash. So with that in mind, I wonder if the director for MM's movie might have done the same thing with that wad of cash the millionaire was shown using in the diner. Or was it all fake?
292:
1536:) a member of the Federal Reserve says that the Federal Reserve still holds around $ 11 billion in gold certificates. This seems to be somewhere around the amount that was originally printed in series 1934 gold certificates, which makes me think that a large number of $ 100,000 bills are still held and counted as legal tender by the treasury. This might be original research on my part but I found it interesting and maybe something could be added to the page. :P
84:
1584:, especially for something as simple as disagreeing and reverting your edit with a reasonable edit summary. It would be more helpful if you used the talk page to explain your rationale for why the content should be included and to comment on the content, not the contributor. The article in question only mentions $ 1,000 bills in passing, but says nothing that would indicate that it's an important use of the denomination in any way. -
1455:
proposal is that instead of keeping all of those assets locked up for a contingency that may never happen, the
Treasury wants the privilege of saving about $ 3 to $ 4 million a year in interest on outstanding debt by using those assets to retire the debt to that extent, with a clear provision that if any of these old notes should later show up, they will be fully redeemed.
22:
1447:
The
Federal Reserve banks would pay to the Treasury an amount sufficient to discharge their liabilities for outstanding Federal Reserve notes. This action would make available to the Treasury for current use approximately $ 3 to $ 4 million a year. Any of the old notes presented for redemption would be redeemed in regular course from the general fund of the Treasury.
2315:
353:
1629:
dangers associated with investment schemes that promise very high rates of interest that are, among other things, supposedly generated through secret trading programs involving financial instruments. That SR letter listed the general characteristics or "red flags" of illicit financial instrument investment scams.
1211:
title character, "Pluto Nash". They used a type of paper money with
Hillary Rodham Clinton's portrait on it, and it was said she had been a U.S. President. If I'm not mistaken, her version replaced Benjamin Franklin on the $ 100.00 bill/note. I include this "movie trivia" as an afterthought, I suppose.
2294:
It might be nice if the table heading "Fr." were explained in the body of the article or in a table note, rather than requiring the reader to sort through the notes and references to realize that it refers to the "Friedberg number" and then sort further to find out that the
Friedbergs created a guide
1853:
Sections removed. Each one ($ 500, $ 1000, $ 5000, and $ 10000) focused solely on small-size note issuance and people depicted despite illustrating large-size notes. Numerous errors were also noted. For example, the $ 500 and $ 1,000 sections described small-size
Federal Reserve Notes issued in 1918,
1387:
This listing, of a $ 100,000 Gold
Certificate, is intended for educational purposes only. I do not own this note, nor have I ever owned it in the past. The description and the scan were uploaded in response to the many people who claim they have a genuine $ 100,000 Gold Certificate, and would like to
1276:
Introduction For most of their history after World War II, Treasury notes have been issued with denominations never rising above a high of $ 1 million. Yet, from 1955 to 1969, the
Treasury issued Treasury notes with the added denominations of $ 100 million and $ 500 million. The purpose of this study
1214:
Now here is what I really want to write about and/or ask about. The $ 1,000.00 bill/note that I saw in Marilyn Monroe's movie! I took a screenshot of that scene. What I want to know is, is it genuine, or just a movie prop? It doesn't seem to match the example that you all ready have though. But after
1152:
Is it worthwhile to mention this amount (e.g. $ 100,000 bill now worth $ 1.6 mil etc.)? The simple fact is that currency redemption is not adjusted for inflation. If you presented any of these bills for deposit at any bank you would be given face value, just as if I presented a $ 5 bill issued in the
418:
According to the website referenced, in the article, the large denominations were cancelled due to lack of use and not because of an executive order issued by Nixon to fight organized crime. Additionally there is no record of Richard Nixon ever issuing an executive order concerning either the Federal
1645:
Federal law enforcement authorities have asked the Federal Reserve to advise individuals, banking organizations, and other entities who have been contacted regarding the phony Federal Reserve Notes to contact the local offices of the agencies. This includes the field offices of the Federal Bureau of
1446:
The bill would authorize the Treasury to transfer the amounts of this old currency from its currency accounts to the outstanding public debt, to be reported as part of the outstanding public debt, in the same manner as Federal Reserve bank notes, national bank notes, and U.S. notes are now reported.
710:
I understood that US currency never expires, thus all bills could (in theory) still be used for face value. However, most old bills are move valuable as collectors items and would never actually be used as currency. This does explain why we now have THREE different "modern" $ 50, $ 20 and $ 10 bills
2366:
You're confusing "full sized" with "life sized". A full sized image is the largest resolution of the image, while a life sized image is one that depicts an object in terms of its actual size. We can't "fix" the image to show at actual size, as different screens will resize the page and change the
1641:
Board staff is also aware that wrongdoers have been falsely claiming that the "notes" can be taken to banks and other financial institutions to be used to collateralize loans or traded as part of an investment program. They cannot be used for any purpose whatsoever because they are entirely bogus.3
1454:
The chairman would state that that appears to be a rather technical provision, but he understands it just boils down to this, that a very substantial amount of paper money has been lost or destroyed and the backing for it in gold and gold certificates is still kept for its ultimate redemption. This
1391:
The $ 100,000 Gold Certificate is the highest denomination ever printed for all Federal paper money in the United States. The notes were dated Series of 1934 and a total of 42,000 units were printed. Depicted on the front of the note is Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the United States. He served
1348:
The Secretary of the Treasury, pursuant to the authority of the Second Lib- erty Bond Act, approved September 24, 1917, as amended, offers for subscrip- tion, at par, 1% percent notes of the United States, designated Treasury notes of series D-1936, in payment of which only Treasury certificates of
1092:
There are many excellent scans/images of $ 500, $ 1000, $ 5000 and $ 10,000 bills available, plus a handful of scans/images of large-size large denomations. For example, a small-size $ 1000 gold certificate would be one of interest to show, due to its high value as a collector's item. Regular FRN $
523:
Theoretically, you could cash a high-denomination ($ 500, $ 1000, $ 5000, $ 10,000) bill at a U.S. bank, and receive the same amount back in smaller notes. But you wouldn't want to do so because, firstly, they are worth more than their face value to collectors (i.e., you can sell them on ebay), and
505:
But how was this recall act in 1969 supposed to combat crime? Presumably it caused some inconvenience to criminals who were forced to carry larger stacks of bills for their illicit transactions - but if the banks are still accepting the old bills, there is still plenty of opportunity to forge them?
1998:
to refute your claim. Further, the images themselves seem to be questionable. They are all listed as fair use, which doesn't appear to be the case, they credit the Bureau of Engraving and Printing and the Federal Reserve as authors of the fake notes (absolutely not the case), and they, I think, do
1881:
in order to actually coax him to fight off the enemy. However, planes carrying the notes (which where in Federal Reserve boxes) crashed, and the boxes, along with the notes, can be found today in caves. crashed aircraft, or sunken submarines. The question is is this true, and is it worthy of being
1649:
Reserve Banks are asked to distribute this SR letter to the domestic and foreign banking organizations supervised by the Federal Reserve in their districts. Questions concerning this matter should be directed to a senior special investigator in the Special Investigations Section of the Division of
1637:
Except for coins, U.S. currency is in the form of "Federal Reserve Notes." The notes are designed and printed by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing of the U.S. Department of the Treasury and are circulated through the 12 Federal Reserve Banks in the United States. These notes are familiar – they
1628:
Over the past several years, the Federal Reserve has issued various advisories relating to bogus investment schemes involving phony "prime bank" notes, letters of credit, and guarantees, and other financial instruments. In May 2002, in SR letter 02-13 the Federal Reserve once again highlighted the
1442:
The CHAIRMAN. S. 3714 would authorize the Treasury to adjust its accounts with respect to the large size currency issued by the Government prior to 1929 and with respect to about $ 12 million of gold certificates issued between 1929 and 1934. The Treasury and the Federal Reserve System are holding
1132:
Two of the entries seem to be conflicting. At one point in the article it states "there are only about two hundred $ 5,000 bills, and three hundred $ 10,000 bills known, of all series since 1861". The next paragraph goes on to state "as of May 30, 2009, there were only 336 of the $ 10,000 bills in
1618:
I took out the mentions of the $ 500,000,000 bill references. I've seen pictures of that supposed "bill" which is obviously a crudely edited version of a $ 1,000 bill. The object in the photo is a fake bond from a Philippine scam claiming to have trillions in unaccounted for bonds and such. It
1450:
The bill would also permit the Secretary of the Treasury to determine the amount of the old currency which has been destroyed or irretrievably lost and to reduce amounts of this old currency outstanding on the records of the Treasury. This action would not impair the redeemability of any currency
1189:
I am going to remove the inflation adjusted numbers. The biggest problem I see with it is the question of from what date the inflation is done from. The $ 10,000 bill was used for many years. Are you inflation adjusting from the first bill that was printed (say 1919) or the last one or one in the
921:
they have been declared at customs INBOUND to the United States. At the time of use or ownership questioning the holder must provide that customs' declaration. I struck the line, temporally, about all know items being in museums. Harris and NCS (now defunct) have both auctioned off privately held
1623:
Exactly!. Other versions have $ 500's, $ 100's, $ 50's, $ 20's, and even $ 1's edited and coupons added, same case for this, a person put a picture of a $ 1,000 note into paint, added coupons, and changed the denomination and such. Also, this was allegedly issued during the 30's, but if you look
1432:
The bill would authorize adjustments in the accounts of paper currency issues of the United States issued prior to July 1, 1929, and gold certificates issued prior to January 30, 1934, and the writing off the Treasury statements and accounts of the amount of each denomination of each kind of old
1210:
Hello! I came here to learn about something I saw in the final scenes of "How to Marry a Millionaire" that I saw Thursday morning. However as I've been reading your various articles, it came to my mind that I should mention the prop currency seen in the Eddie Murphy movie, in which he played the
553:
I would like to add a bit to this since the details are hard to find from a simple web search. Legal Tender means something different in each jurisdiction, but in the U.S. it means that the tender is a valid way to discharge a debt if the parties that contracted the debt did not specify another
1301:
Treasury Notes: Series A-1947 Description: Authorizing Act (s): 24 September 1917, amended Liability: Public Debt Issued for: United States Treasury Instrument Type: Note Conditions: Interest: 1.50% Maturity: 4 years Redeemable: on maturity Callable: n/a Sold at: par Denominations: Negotiable:
1633:
Since the issuance of the Federal Reserve's last pronouncement about fraudulent investment schemes in 2002, Board staff has become aware of the growing use of altered Federal Reserve Notes as part of illicit investment schemes. The notes are in face amounts of $ 1 billion, $ 500 million, $ 100
1061:
Its funny you should mention this -- I've heard this was going on in Texas. A friend of my family who worked in construction/carpentry occasionally carried $ 500 bills, as late as the early-1990s. I also seem to remember hearing you could "order" (as in a trade) $ 500 or $ 1000 bills in Texas,
2349:
Some, but not all, and probably not most, of the images of currency will take a reader to a page with the image and some text, but, on that page, a click of the image does NOT take the reader to a stand-alone FULL-SIZED image of the currency front-and-back. ("Full-sized" means in terms of the
1433:
large-size currency now outstanding that has been destroyed or irretrievably lost and which in the judgment of the Secretary of the Treasury will never be presented for redemption. The effect of the proposal would be to improve the cash position of the Treasury by more than $ 100 million.
1355:
The notes will be dated September 15, 1934, and will bear interest from that date at the rate of 1^^ percent per annum, payable semiannually on March 15 and September 15 in each year. They will mature September 15, 1936, and will not be subject to call for redemption prior to maturity.
922:
specimens over the past few years. Declarations of import (and reasoning that they were purchased or traded-for in foreign countries) were provided. Unless the author can provide referenced proof that they are now, as of this date, all in museums, the line should probably be removed.
1443:
approximately $ 100 million in gold, silver, and other assets as security for this old currency. This includes about $ 61 million in gold and silver reserves held by the Treasury and about $ 37 million in reserves held by the Federal Reserve banks to secure Federal Reserve notes.
1565:, I believe you showed a measure of bad faith in your recent edit to remove content I had added. You treated the edit almost as if it was vandalism, and I disagree with your assertions. Perhaps consensus will support your actions, but you've quite a ways to go to convince me.--
1045:
I'm not sure where I can find a verifiable source for this, but as late as 2005 people I know have received thousand-dollar bills as payment, and have gotten five hundreds and thousands when they cashed in their tax return checks. Could this only be limited to Texas though?
1486:
I mean, if these things were really only used by Federal Reserve banks, why on earth would you need an act to “authorize adjustments in the accounts of paper currency and writing off old large-size currency now outstanding that has been destroyed or irretrievably lost”???
1713:, c. 1980 there were 66 1934 Gold certificates amounting to $ 2,166,600. Looking at the amount/number of notes received by different Federal Reserve Banks and the Smithsonian, and those retained by the Treasury, there are likely about 20 $ 100,000 notes in existence.-
491:
Yes, you can cash it in. They're still legal tender, but they've been on "permanent recall" since 1969, meaning whenever one comes across the window at a bank, the bank is supposed to send it in to the local branch of the Federal Reserve for redemption and shredding.
1395:
It is important to understand that $ 100,000 Gold Certificates (like the one pictured) were intended for use in FISCAL CHANNELS ONLY. They were never issued for general circulation. The notes are strictly government property and are not legal to collect or own.
2144:
How are the 1¢, 5¢, 10¢, 25¢ and 50¢ coins not denominations in which the US dollar is issued? If the claim is that they're denominations of the cent rather than the dollar, then I don't think you can claim this about the 25¢ and 50¢ coins, which according to
1359:
The notes shall be exempt, both as to principal and interest, from all taxa- tion (except estate or inheritance taxes) now or hereafter imposed by the United States, any State, or any of the possessions of the United States, or by any local taxing authority.
2350:
original image, not the currency. The full-sized images are MUCH larger than the currencies of which they are photos.) But on many other images you do get to the full-sized unframed stand-alone image in two clicks. Please fix for all those that are broken.
1733:
Would there be any objection if this article were converted into a more tradition list-format article. I could supply high resolution scans from the Smithsonian which would allow for a nearly complete typeset. Just curious about the general reaction...
905:
The edit is correct. Although most gold certificates are legal to own, the 1934 series certificates (the ones mentioned with the orange reverses) are illegal to own because they were never released to the public and only used for intra-governmental
516:
Legal tender and an obligation to accept any currency are two different things, you can not force any business or person to accept cash as payment (like a 100$ at a toll both), you can force the government to accept it (such as paying a tax).
1914:
This isn't appropriate content for this article. This article talks about $ 500 though $ 100,000 bills, and nothing about bonds and fake notes. So, please remove it. You can create your own page, if you want. But, it doesn't belong here.
1363:
The notes will be accepted at par during such time and under such rules and regulations as shall be prescribed or approved by the Secretary of the Treasury in payment of income and profits taxes payable at the maturity of the notes.
524:
secondly, because the bill will be destroyed (and the bills, especially the $ 5000 and $ 10,000, are already very rare). Also, if a high-denomination bill is spent at a store, it will probably return to a bank, and be destroyed.
1763:
Close to making significant edits and import table. Current section leads will be deleted as they focus only on the Series of 1928 notes and later whereas the new table/images represent 1862 through and including the small size
729:
This is because counterfeiting large numbers of out of date currency would be immediately suspect due to the their new appearance, sequential serial numbers and the sheer unlikelihood of anyone accepting large numbers of them.
620:
Problem with that is the President only controls the excituve branch and cannot make laws or take things away from people without due process. An Excsutive Order is an order directing a member of that branch to do something.
506:
Also, if they are "legal tender", does that mean I'm personally obliged to accept one, if a friend owes me $ 1,000 and offers me a $ 1,000 bill in payment? I wouldn't have a clue how to verify that the note was genuine.
1505:
There were 100m and 500m notes, with Ulysses Grant on 100m and Grover Cleveland on 500m. These were to be sent to Chiang Kai Shek to fight of the commies, but the plane carrying the notes crashed in a filipino jungle.
1451:
subsequently presented to the Treasury. The Treasury would be authorized to withhold from destruction one piece of each currency issue to provide a historical collection of the paper currency of the United States.
1349:
indebted- ness of series TS-1934, maturing September 15, 1934, may be tendered. The amount of the offering is limited to the amount of Treasury certificates of indebtedness of series TS-1934 tendered and accepted.
382:
For the denomination bills of $ 5 to $ 100, I added pre-Federal Reserve histories. But how about the $ 500 through $ 10,000?? It can be harder because this page would be about 4 times as large as the other pages.
718:
This seems to make the addition of new security features rather pointless. Why would a forger waste time trying to counterfeit a "new" $ 10, $ 20 or $ 50 bill, when an "old" one will always remain legal tender?
1596:
Deconstructing an article is not constructive. I stand by my comment and it goes much deeper than the simple revert that you are suggesting. Nevertheless you are welcome to call things what you like. Cheers.--
968:, the lead character uncovers a secret plan by the U.S. President to fund a revolution in Latin America with stacks of discontinued $ 10,000 bills, money taken from the U.S. Treasury that will not be missed.
301:
195:
1133:
circulation; 342 remaining $ 5,000 bills; and 165,372 $ 1,000 bills still being used". If these numbers are referencing something different, it does not appear to be clear. Can someone clarify?
2073:- I'm pretty suspect about these "bills" too---note the '60s-era "THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER" text and what appears to be the English-era Treasury seal, again, wasn't prevalent until the '60s.
1902:
2408:
1370:
Bearer notes with interest coupons attached will be issued in denominations of $ 100, $ 500, $ 1,000, $ 5,000, $ 10,000, and $ 100,000. The notes will not be issued in registered form.
1483:
How can you have “gold certificates, Series of 1934″ which are “issued only to Federal Reserve banks and do not appear in circulation” that have been DESTROYED or IRRETRIEVABLY LOST?
1302:
Coupon: $ $ 500, $ 1,000, $ 5,000, $ 10,000, $ 100,000, $ 1,000,000 Non-Negotiable: n/a Issues: Series A-1947 Source(s): Annual Report of the Secretary of the Treasury, 1943: 327.
1218:
I don't know how to insert the screenshot here! But anyway, any help would be appreciated. Plus, I hope that if I can share my screenshot, that it could be helpful to this article.
114:
1694:
Serial numbers 2 and 3 also still exist. As of the mid 1990's they were together with #1 at the Bureau of Engraving and Printing. The #1 is now part of the Smithsonian collection.-
1873:
Hello. I have question. I've heard that larger denomination of $ 100,000,000, $ 500,000,000, & even $ 1,000,000,000 have been issued. According my sources, these notes were
1420:
BILLS TO EXTEND AUTHORITY OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS TO PURCHASE TREASURY OBLIGATIONS AND TO AUTHORIZE ADJUSTMENTS IN ACCOUNTS OF OUTSTANDING OLD SERIES CURRENCY JUNE 24, 1960
1510:
1237:
I couldn't figure out how to add a citation without messing up the formatting. Here is an official .gov page noting that private ownership of the $ 100,000 bill is illegal:
2433:
306:
131:
471:. Is there any way this can be added back in?? Also, all the articles of today's bills have a complete history; can anyone add the complete history of the larger bills??
1022:
1409:
Well, they were “accounted for” by wiping “approximately $ 100 million in gold, silver, and other assets as security for this old currency” under the carpet in 1961:
2403:
2236:
2232:
2218:
167:
157:
2188:
2423:
1828:
Could there be a section a the page showing the uses of these larger US Large Denominations in Popular Culture? It would be a good expansion for the page. --
1018:
676:
282:
272:
2428:
2413:
121:
1634:
million, or $ 50 million or some other astronomically large amount and have "coupons" attached to them. They often look like the picture to the right.
1334:
Very interesting that here you find the proof that bonds with attached interest coupons WERE issued and with nominations as high as $ 100,000 as well:
2443:
1907:
126:
2036:
in the absence of a reliable source. Anyway, isn't discussing the existence of secret objects whose existence is denied due to secrecy dangerous?
2398:
852:
845:
This article needs a section regarding the "Grand Watermelon", which in time should probably be split off into a separate page. See this article
1991:
1646:
Investigation, U.S. Secret Service, U.S. Bureau of Immigration and Enforcement, or Internal Revenue Service's Criminal Investigation Division.
248:
483:
If, conceivably, I DID have a $ 1000 bill, could i cash it in at a bank? Or are they like confederate money, worthless except to collectors?
2137:
1936:- None of the images posted in this section are genuine (currency or bonds). Either way, they do not fit within the scope of this article.--
2418:
1791:
This page has high quality scans of the $ 100,000 bill, much higher than the ones in the article. Maybe they could be cropped and added?
1624:
closely, the seal is in English (English seal was introduced in 1966), and the obligation does not moention "Lawful money". The Fed writes:
1098:
1063:
856:
831:
531:
447:, there was no Excutive Order signed by Nixon to halt priting of bills thus I am removing the statement about Nixon issuing such an order.
337:
760:
If there are 300 $ 10,000 bills surviving, how can the survival of "most" of them be due to Benny Binion's conservation of 100 of them?
405:
1946 is when the government stopped printing the large bills. 1969 is when it actually started withdrawing these bills from circulation.
2438:
2351:
2204:
1543:
1002:
97:
58:
1270:
A Paper for Presentation at the 2005 Annual Conference of the Economic History Society at the University of Leicester, 8-10 April 2005
807:
Some intrepid editor may want to take note of the Secret Service seizure of the Ray Comfort million dollar bill tract. More info here:
1829:
1807:
1190:
middle? Even if we inflation adjusted from the first bill that was printed, this information is not really pertinant to this article.
1047:
915:
Two items at issue here. The gold certificates (including the gold-backs) ARE legal to own, and even to trade (as in use to purchase)
109:
2214:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
2146:
690:
235:
190:
2129:
1475:
1259:
This paper (with references) confirms that Treasury notes with very high nominations HAVE indeed been issued by the US Treasury:
1399:
Of the 42,000 notes printed, there are no notes outstanding. In other words, all the notes that were printed are accounted for.
2302:
2133:
1480:“Excludes gold certificates, Series of 1934, which are issued only to Federal Reserve banks and do not appear in circulation.”
1169:
1405:
Interesting contradiction. How can you have “many people who claim” when “all the notes that were printed are accounted for”?
818:
Done and done. As a member of GNN, I've got somewhat of an inside track. It's slowly being picked up by the news media, and
2121:
1311:
669:
1329:
105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
2125:
2117:
2113:
365:
2279:
33:
895:, saying that since 1964 there have been no restrictions on acquiring or holding the Gold Certificates, is accurate. --
873:
992:
1093:
1000 bills are relatively common (just take a look at ebay) but Gold Certs are rare. Is there a rule that says we
813:
2041:
1277:
is to determine why the Treasury issued these very-high-denomination Treasury notes and why it stopped doing so.
2383:
2359:
2338:
2306:
2284:
2235:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2173:
2158:
2082:
2045:
2008:
1970:
1945:
1924:
1891:
1863:
1837:
1811:
1773:
1758:
1743:
1722:
1703:
1662:
1605:
1591:
1574:
1551:
1521:
1499:
1249:
1227:
1199:
1183:
1142:
1121:
1106:
1071:
1055:
1034:
1010:
981:
926:
910:
899:
880:
864:
835:
797:
782:
764:
749:
734:
723:
698:
630:
563:
539:
510:
456:
434:
387:
369:
345:
1426:
Washington, March 9, 1959. Hon. A. WILLIS ROBERTSON, Chairman, Committee on Banking and Currency, U.S. Senate.
1367:
The notes will be acceptable to secure deposits of public moneys, but will not bear the circulation privilege.
1223:
1102:
1067:
945:
860:
827:
535:
361:
341:
1412:
1429:
DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: Your letter of February 27, 1959, acknowledged March 2, requests our comments on S. 1177.
1006:
444:
420:
2355:
2270:
2196:
2109:
2078:
1547:
1085:
1051:
846:
793:
The article as is looks extremely cluttered. Propose to dump most of the pictures into a gallery format. --
694:
2192:
1966:
1897:
1887:
1833:
1803:
977:
1219:
2254:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2242:
2169:
1289:
This pdf, for example, shows that there multiple treasury notes with very high nominations were issued:
559:
472:
398:
384:
39:
2195:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1990:- I highly doubt the source of your information (per your comment on my talk page) would be considered
1799:
1245:
467:
It appears that some information was dropped; namely who was on the $ 1000 bill during the time of the
1786:
1749:
If there is no objection I will start working on the table off line and have it ready in a few weeks.-
731:
431:
2205:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140625074516/http://moneyfactory.gov/uscurrency/largedenominations.html
2105:
2037:
1995:
1795:
1679:
1539:
1436:
We believe that the purpose of S. 1177 is meritorious and would have no objections to its enactment.
1157:
998:
771:
686:
527:
89:
1262:
1175:
1161:
484:
21:
1658:
1601:
1588:
1570:
1517:
1179:
1165:
823:
819:
680:
2208:
1241:
247:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2074:
1920:
1284:
1117:
1030:
794:
779:
741:
622:
448:
227:
2239:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
991:
I think there should be a mention of the fictional trillion-dollar bill in the Simpsons episode
211:
184:
73:
52:
2295:
to US bank notes. This is a somewhat obscure piece of arcana that requires a bit of expansion.
2255:
2032:- Any statement that something exists, but that its existence is denied due to secrecy, is not
2070:
2029:
2004:
1987:
1962:
1958:
1941:
1933:
1883:
1859:
1769:
1754:
1739:
1718:
1699:
1476:
http://www.archive.org/stream/treasurybulletin1967unitaug/treasurybulletin1967unitaug_djvu.txt
1138:
973:
1376:
Googling for “series of 1934″ (with the “” also in the google search bar), like for example:
336:
Its been added. Its also a fairly grainy, small image. I propose a better scan replace it. --
2165:
1495:
964:
923:
775:
745:
666:
646:
626:
598:
555:
468:
452:
332:, there is a picture of a $ 10,000 bill. Can you copy it to this page?? User 66.245.114.181
2262:
1464:
291:
1878:
1562:
1472:
Also a very interesting detail can be found in several Treasury bulletins, like this one:
1379:
1326:
1320:
1312:
http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=creator:%22United+States.+Dept.+of+the+Treasury%22
1238:
1195:
1017:
There has been resistance against putting fictional instances into this article. Look at
896:
614:
329:
1999:
not contain a valid image license. Please do not add them back to the article. Thanks.--
1330:
http://www.archive.org/stream/annualreportofse1935unit/annualreportofse1935unit_djvu.txt
683:, the 19th president. The Fake currency is actually a tract given out. ( I have one! )
665:
Who's the man on the picture of the million dollar bill at the bottom of this article??
2374:
2329:
2296:
2221:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
2154:
1654:
1597:
1585:
1581:
1566:
1513:
950:
877:
774:(which were the notes held by Binion) rather than other denominations from series like
2261:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1062:
presumably at any major bank you had an account with? Anyone else heard about this? --
635:
Does that include gold jewellery and such, or was it just those big bricks you see in
2392:
1961:- The bonds are real alright. Their existence is denied by the Fed due to secrecy. --
1916:
1113:
1026:
954:
588:
406:
102:
939:
I have removed the "In popular culture" section. It contained the following items:
2000:
1937:
1855:
1765:
1750:
1735:
1714:
1695:
1134:
497:
1710:
1308:
The Annual Reports of the Secretary of the Treasury can be found at archive.org:
2228:
2033:
1491:
907:
761:
720:
643:
640:
605:
no, but it was from 1933 to 1975 when the ownership of bullion was re-legalized.
595:
592:
507:
240:
1507:
1112:
Images of US currency are considered public domain, so any image may be used. -
814:
http://www.worldviewweekend.com/secure/cwnetwork/article.php?&ArticleID=770
657:
What's with the last paragraph. The woman was arrested and beaten? Say what?
2227:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1533:
1191:
636:
610:
244:
217:
79:
2368:
2323:
2150:
1439:
Sincerely yours, JOSEPH CAMPBELL, Comptroller General of the United States.
1082:↓Do we really need to use the generic grainy images of large denominations?
1413:
http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/docs/historical/senate/senate_frdp_old1960.pdf
397:
Where did 1969 come from?? I always thought it was 1946 for all the bills.
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
740:
Not really as there is a process to make bills look older than they are.
445:
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/1969-nixon.html
421:
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/1969-nixon.html
419:
Reserve or organized crime at the National Archives for the year 1969.
1650:
Banking Supervision and Regulation at (202) 452-6488 or (202) 452-228.
1469:“The act of June 30, 1961, is the Old Series Currency Adjustment Act”
711:
and TWO different "modern" $ 100, and $ 5 bills still in circulation.
1461:
This act appears to have been enacted, but it may have been changed:
1290:
1787:
http://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/search/object/nmah_742353
1206:"The Adventures of Pluto Nash" & "How To Marry A Millionaire"!
1084:
1023:
Talk:Fake_denominations_of_United_States_currency#Simpsons_episode
1680:
http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/SRletters/2003/sr0314.htm
1263:
http://www.ehs.org.uk/ehs/conference2005/Assets/NollFullPaper.doc
579:"the gold standard was repealed and gold was made illegal to own"
1882:
added to the article. Below are images of such notes. Thanks, --
822:
has said he'll be interviewed on television about the incident.
584:
2209:
http://www.moneyfactory.gov/uscurrency/largedenominations.html
2149:
are marked "QUARTER DOLLAR" and "HALF DOLLAR" respectively. —
1285:
http://franklinnoll.com/Treasury-Securities-Knowledgebase.html
15:
290:
1388:
know a little more about their note. This then is for you.
810:
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50495
2199:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
957:" (i.e. a $ 5,000 bill) by his former friend Terry Lennox.
1319:
This one should be very interesting. The one from 1934:
1465:
http://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/section16.htm
1380:
http://www.highdenomination.com/Gold_Details.asp?id=904
1327:
http://www.archive.org/details/annualreportofse1935unit
1321:
http://www.archive.org/details/annualreportofse1934unit
892:
591:? No it's not. What is this sentence meant to be about?
1239:
http://www.moneyfactory.gov/100000goldcertificate.html
1342:
Treasury Department, Washington, September 10, 1934.
239:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2231:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
770:Maybe it's referencing the "known" population of
2409:B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
2367:resolution of the images to non-actual size. -
2217:This message was posted before February 2018.
2189:Large denominations of United States currency
876:it's press released by the Auction house. --
8:
1528:$ 100,000 gold certificates still used/held?
1019:Fake denominations of United States currency
849:for brief details of the grand watermelons.
677:Fake denominations of United States currency
378:Pre-Federal Reserve histories of large bills
1994:to support your claims. There is, however,
1782:High resolution scans of the $ 100,000 note
1283:This guy also has more interesting papers:
1041:$ 500 and $ 1000 bills still in circulation
611:http://www.austincoins.com/confiscation.htm
2187:I have just modified one external link on
1819:Uses in Pop Culture / Edit Request 5/10/14
1534:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eExucI3IWs
1423:COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES,
525:
179:
47:
2434:Mid-importance American currency articles
887:legal or illegal to own the orange bills?
1672:
803:Ray Comfort and the million dollar bill
181:
49:
19:
1619:obviously isn't real. -- ChameleonXVX
847:Collector Pays $ 2.3M for $ 1,000 Bill
2404:Low-importance United States articles
1653:I removed Tamara's $ 500M section. --
872:Good image in that article. As noted
7:
233:This article is within the scope of
95:This article is within the scope of
2424:High-importance numismatic articles
142:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
38:It is of interest to the following
2429:B-Class American currency articles
2414:WikiProject United States articles
1291:http://franklinnoll.com/Vol_10.pdf
145:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
2191:. Please take a moment to review
2147:Coins of the United States dollar
1908:The $ 1,000,000,000 denomination.
257:Knowledge:WikiProject Numismatics
2444:WikiProject Numismatics articles
2313:
1580:It's not really constructive to
1392:as President from 1913 to 1921.
891:Somebody please confirm whether
351:
302:the American currency task force
260:Template:WikiProject Numismatics
220:
210:
183:
82:
72:
51:
20:
2345:Some links to images are busted
1903:The $ 500,000,000 denomination.
1898:The $ 100,000,000 denomination.
277:This article has been rated as
162:This article has been rated as
2399:B-Class United States articles
2108:has only been issued in seven
1532:In this video at around 1:45 (
982:00:40, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
583:Um, what? It's illegal to own
370:10:49, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
1:
2285:04:43, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
2174:21:43, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
2159:19:30, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
1812:03:31, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
1744:03:04, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
1500:18:53, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
1250:08:37, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
1172:) 20:48, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
1097:to use the current images? --
1021:, as well as the discussion,
911:16:36, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
900:11:36, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
881:15:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
865:00:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
724:02:23, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
670:16:58, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
511:02:23, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
299:This article is supported by
251:and see a list of open tasks.
2307:12:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
2046:02:47, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
2009:22:26, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
1971:22:08, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
1946:21:05, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
1925:17:15, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
1892:22:04, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
1704:06:04, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
927:20:57, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
735:23:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
435:23:12, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
2419:B-Class numismatic articles
1582:accuse someone of bad faith
1345:EXCHANGE OFFERING OF NOTES
1233:Citation for $ 100,000 bill
1228:14:02, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
1200:06:53, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
1184:20:51, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
706:All US Currency is "in use"
699:06:03, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
2460:
2439:American currency articles
2248:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2184:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1759:05:29, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
1614:$ 500,000,000 bill removed
1255:Even bigger denominations?
1035:15:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
1011:16:41, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
993:The Trouble With Trillions
660:
649:08:12, Sep 27, 2004 (UTC)
601:20:54, Sep 25, 2004 (UTC)
283:project's importance scale
168:project's importance scale
2164:I have tried to fix this
1864:07:28, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
1774:01:07, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
1729:Conversion to list-format
1723:20:29, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
1552:17:26, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
1522:20:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
1148:Current Equivalent Values
1122:15:02, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
1107:08:56, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
1072:08:56, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
617:00:42, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)
564:14:58, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
540:08:22, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
487:22:08, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
475:00:29, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)
401:13:45, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)
346:09:09, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
298:
276:
205:
161:
98:WikiProject United States
67:
46:
2384:12:44, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
2360:05:40, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
2339:12:46, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
2083:15:22, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
1838:22:08, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
1663:23:58, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
1606:06:19, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
1592:06:06, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
1575:05:56, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
1143:15:12, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
1056:17:32, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
836:21:10, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
798:22:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
783:22:26, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
750:17:02, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
679:, and the man's name is
631:17:00, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
457:16:55, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
409:22:44, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
103:United States of America
2362:Christopher L. Simpson
2180:External links modified
1709:Actually, according to
953:is sent a "portrait of
765:06:02, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
388:14:52, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
236:WikiProject Numismatics
1849:Article reorganization
1295:For example (page 5):
1089:
789:Propose to add gallery
295:
148:United States articles
28:This article is rated
1869:Larger Denominations?
1352:DESCRIPTION OF NOTES
1273:By Dr. Franklin Noll
1088:
855:comment was added by
772:Federal Reserve Notes
294:
2229:regular verification
90:United States portal
2219:After February 2018
2099:Only denominations?
778:and other series.--
681:Rutherford_B._Hayes
613:for a discussion.
362:Charles Edwin Shipp
263:numismatic articles
116:Articles Requested!
2273:InternetArchiveBot
2224:InternetArchiveBot
1090:
943:In the 1953 novel
935:In popular culture
296:
228:Numismatics portal
34:content assessment
2249:
2104:"Since then, the
2071:User:Hans Barbosa
2030:User:Hans Barbosa
1959:User:Hans Barbosa
1934:User:Hans Barbosa
1815:
1798:comment added by
1558:Recent reversions
1542:comment added by
1174:
1160:comment added by
1128:Confusion content
1001:comment added by
962:In the 1989 film
868:
689:comment added by
542:
530:comment added by
469:large-sized notes
321:
320:
317:
316:
313:
312:
196:American currency
178:
177:
174:
173:
2451:
2321:
2317:
2316:
2299:
2283:
2274:
2247:
2246:
2225:
1877:to be issued to
1814:
1792:
1690:$ 100,000 census
1682:
1677:
1554:
1173:
1154:
1013:
987:Simpsons episode
965:The Mighty Quinn
949:, the detective
946:The Long Goodbye
850:
841:Grand Watermelon
776:Gold Certificate
701:
661:Who's that man??
359:
355:
354:
265:
264:
261:
258:
255:
230:
225:
224:
223:
214:
207:
206:
201:
198:
187:
180:
150:
149:
146:
143:
140:
92:
87:
86:
85:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
2459:
2458:
2454:
2453:
2452:
2450:
2449:
2448:
2389:
2388:
2379:
2347:
2334:
2314:
2312:
2305:
2297:
2292:
2277:
2272:
2240:
2233:have permission
2223:
2197:this simple FaQ
2182:
2101:
2038:Robert McClenon
1879:Chiang Kai-Shek
1871:
1851:
1821:
1793:
1784:
1731:
1692:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1678:
1674:
1616:
1560:
1537:
1530:
1257:
1235:
1208:
1155:
1150:
1130:
1080:
1043:
996:
989:
937:
889:
851:—The preceding
843:
805:
791:
758:
708:
684:
675:Its now on the
663:
655:
576:
481:
465:
395:
380:
352:
350:
330:Salmon P. Chase
326:
324:Salmon P. Chase
279:High-importance
262:
259:
256:
253:
252:
226:
221:
219:
200:High‑importance
199:
193:
147:
144:
141:
138:
137:
136:
122:Become a Member
88:
83:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
2457:
2455:
2447:
2446:
2441:
2436:
2431:
2426:
2421:
2416:
2411:
2406:
2401:
2391:
2390:
2387:
2386:
2373:
2346:
2343:
2342:
2341:
2328:
2301:
2291:
2288:
2267:
2266:
2259:
2212:
2211:
2203:Added archive
2181:
2178:
2177:
2176:
2100:
2097:
2096:
2095:
2094:
2093:
2092:
2091:
2090:
2089:
2088:
2087:
2086:
2085:
2057:
2056:
2055:
2054:
2053:
2052:
2051:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2018:
2017:
2016:
2015:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2011:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1973:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1948:
1928:
1927:
1911:
1910:
1905:
1900:
1870:
1867:
1850:
1847:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1820:
1817:
1783:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1730:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1691:
1688:
1684:
1683:
1671:
1670:
1666:
1632:
1626:
1625:
1615:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1559:
1556:
1529:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1514:Tamara Johnson
1490:
1408:
1316:
1256:
1253:
1234:
1231:
1220:LeoStarDragon1
1207:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1149:
1146:
1129:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1099:98.232.181.201
1079:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1064:98.232.181.201
1042:
1039:
1038:
1037:
988:
985:
970:
969:
959:
958:
951:Philip Marlowe
936:
933:
932:
931:
930:
929:
888:
885:
884:
883:
857:72.240.211.151
842:
839:
824:MessengerAtLWU
804:
801:
790:
787:
786:
785:
757:
754:
753:
752:
727:
726:
707:
704:
703:
702:
662:
659:
654:
651:
615:Rick Boatright
607:
606:
581:
580:
575:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
546:
545:
544:
543:
532:118.211.76.171
514:
513:
480:
477:
464:
461:
460:
459:
439:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
411:
410:
394:
391:
379:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
338:98.232.181.201
325:
322:
319:
318:
315:
314:
311:
310:
307:Mid-importance
297:
287:
286:
275:
269:
268:
266:
249:the discussion
232:
231:
215:
203:
202:
188:
176:
175:
172:
171:
164:Low-importance
160:
154:
153:
151:
135:
134:
129:
124:
119:
112:
110:Template Usage
106:
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
62:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2456:
2445:
2442:
2440:
2437:
2435:
2432:
2430:
2427:
2425:
2422:
2420:
2417:
2415:
2412:
2410:
2407:
2405:
2402:
2400:
2397:
2396:
2394:
2385:
2382:
2378:
2377:
2372:
2371:
2365:
2364:
2363:
2361:
2357:
2353:
2352:204.155.230.3
2344:
2340:
2337:
2333:
2332:
2327:
2326:
2320:
2311:
2310:
2309:
2308:
2304:
2300:
2289:
2287:
2286:
2281:
2276:
2275:
2264:
2260:
2257:
2253:
2252:
2251:
2244:
2238:
2234:
2230:
2226:
2220:
2215:
2210:
2206:
2202:
2201:
2200:
2198:
2194:
2190:
2185:
2179:
2175:
2171:
2167:
2163:
2162:
2161:
2160:
2156:
2152:
2148:
2142:
2141:
2139:
2135:
2131:
2127:
2123:
2119:
2115:
2111:
2110:denominations
2107:
2098:
2084:
2080:
2076:
2075:DudeWithAFeud
2072:
2069:
2068:
2067:
2066:
2065:
2064:
2063:
2062:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2058:
2047:
2043:
2039:
2035:
2031:
2028:
2027:
2026:
2025:
2024:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2010:
2006:
2002:
1997:
1993:
1989:
1986:
1985:
1984:
1983:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1972:
1968:
1964:
1960:
1957:
1956:
1955:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1947:
1943:
1939:
1935:
1932:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1926:
1922:
1918:
1913:
1912:
1909:
1906:
1904:
1901:
1899:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1889:
1885:
1880:
1876:
1868:
1866:
1865:
1861:
1857:
1848:
1840:Jacob Chesley
1839:
1835:
1831:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1818:
1816:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1789:
1788:
1781:
1775:
1771:
1767:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1712:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1701:
1697:
1689:
1681:
1676:
1673:
1669:
1665:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1639:
1635:
1630:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1613:
1607:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1590:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1557:
1555:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1544:24.121.105.94
1541:
1535:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1508:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1488:
1484:
1481:
1478:
1477:
1473:
1470:
1467:
1466:
1462:
1459:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1437:
1434:
1430:
1427:
1424:
1421:
1418:
1415:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1403:
1400:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1382:
1381:
1377:
1374:
1371:
1368:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1350:
1346:
1343:
1340:
1338:
1335:
1332:
1331:
1328:
1323:
1322:
1317:
1314:
1313:
1309:
1306:
1303:
1299:
1296:
1293:
1292:
1287:
1286:
1281:
1278:
1274:
1271:
1268:
1265:
1264:
1260:
1254:
1252:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1240:
1232:
1230:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1216:
1212:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1147:
1145:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1087:
1083:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1003:70.110.232.68
1000:
994:
986:
984:
983:
979:
975:
967:
966:
961:
960:
956:
952:
948:
947:
942:
941:
940:
934:
928:
925:
920:
919:
914:
913:
912:
909:
904:
903:
902:
901:
898:
894:
886:
882:
879:
875:
871:
870:
869:
866:
862:
858:
854:
848:
840:
838:
837:
833:
829:
825:
821:
820:Darrel Rundus
816:
815:
811:
808:
802:
800:
799:
796:
795:293.xx.xxx.xx
788:
784:
781:
780:293.xx.xxx.xx
777:
773:
769:
768:
767:
766:
763:
755:
751:
747:
743:
739:
738:
737:
736:
733:
725:
722:
717:
716:
715:
712:
705:
700:
696:
692:
688:
682:
678:
674:
673:
672:
671:
668:
658:
652:
650:
648:
645:
641:
638:
633:
632:
628:
624:
618:
616:
612:
604:
603:
602:
600:
597:
593:
590:
589:United States
586:
578:
577:
574:Gold illegal?
573:
565:
561:
557:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
541:
537:
533:
529:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
512:
509:
504:
503:
502:
501:
499:
494:
493:
488:
486:
478:
476:
474:
473:66.245.14.250
470:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
443:According to
442:
441:
440:
437:
436:
433:
422:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
408:
404:
403:
402:
400:
399:66.245.110.24
392:
390:
389:
386:
385:66.245.86.115
377:
371:
367:
363:
358:
349:
348:
347:
343:
339:
335:
334:
333:
331:
323:
308:
305:(assessed as
304:
303:
293:
289:
288:
284:
280:
274:
271:
270:
267:
250:
246:
242:
238:
237:
229:
218:
216:
213:
209:
208:
204:
197:
192:
189:
186:
182:
169:
165:
159:
156:
155:
152:
139:United States
133:
130:
128:
125:
123:
120:
118:
117:
113:
111:
108:
107:
104:
100:
99:
91:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
59:United States
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
2380:
2375:
2369:
2348:
2335:
2330:
2324:
2318:
2293:
2271:
2268:
2243:source check
2222:
2216:
2213:
2186:
2183:
2143:
2103:
2102:
1988:Hans Barbosa
1963:Hans Barbosa
1884:Hans Barbosa
1874:
1872:
1852:
1830:24.147.1.197
1800:ChameleonXVX
1794:— Preceding
1790:
1785:
1732:
1711:the Treasury
1693:
1675:
1667:
1652:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1631:
1627:
1617:
1561:
1538:— Preceding
1531:
1489:
1485:
1482:
1479:
1474:
1471:
1468:
1463:
1460:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1438:
1435:
1431:
1428:
1425:
1422:
1419:
1416:
1411:
1407:
1404:
1401:
1398:
1394:
1390:
1386:
1383:
1378:
1375:
1372:
1369:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1351:
1347:
1344:
1341:
1339:
1336:
1333:
1324:
1318:
1315:
1310:
1307:
1304:
1300:
1297:
1294:
1288:
1282:
1279:
1275:
1272:
1269:
1266:
1261:
1258:
1236:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1151:
1131:
1094:
1091:
1081:
1078:Lousy images
1048:67.149.24.80
1044:
990:
974:Andrew Kelly
971:
963:
944:
938:
917:
916:
890:
844:
817:
812:
809:
806:
792:
759:
756:Benny Binion
728:
713:
709:
664:
656:
634:
619:
608:
582:
526:— Preceding
515:
500:
495:
490:
489:
482:
466:
438:
429:
396:
381:
356:
327:
300:
278:
234:
163:
127:Project Talk
115:
96:
40:WikiProjects
2166:LondonYoung
2106:U.S. dollar
1156:—Preceding
997:—Preceding
924:Lostinlodos
906:transfers.-
732:Beowulf1978
691:99.185.2.22
685:—Preceding
667:Georgia guy
556:LondonYoung
432:Beowulf1978
254:Numismatics
241:numismatics
191:Numismatics
2393:Categories
2280:Report bug
2034:verifiable
1668:References
1563:Trivialist
1325:And 1935:
897:Mathew5000
637:Goldfinger
245:currencies
2298:WikiDan61
2263:this tool
2256:this tool
1764:issues.--
1655:Yang Long
1598:My76Strat
1567:My76Strat
1176:Dougboyle
1162:Dougboyle
893:this edit
878:Kendrick7
485:Rhymeless
479:So then..
2303:ReadMe!!
2269:Cheers.—
1996:evidence
1992:reliable
1917:Buscus 3
1875:supposed
1808:contribs
1796:unsigned
1540:unsigned
1170:contribs
1158:unsigned
1114:Verdatum
1027:Verdatum
999:unsigned
853:unsigned
832:contribs
714:mnw2000
687:unsigned
528:unsigned
407:Funnyhat
2290:Fr. ???
2193:my edit
2001:Godot13
1938:Godot13
1856:Godot13
1766:Godot13
1751:Godot13
1736:Godot13
1734:Thanks-
1715:Godot13
1696:Godot13
1242:Fredirc
1135:Dohhh22
955:Madison
653:Beaten?
587:in the
498:clawson
281:on the
166:on the
30:B-class
2136:, and
1492:L4m4re
908:MBK004
762:Schoen
742:Trentc
721:Mtford
623:Trentc
508:Mtford
463:Uh oh!
449:Trentc
360:?? --
132:Alerts
36:scale.
2138:$ 100
1589:Ghost
1458:–::–
1417:–::–
1402:–::–
1384:–::–
1373:–::–
1337:–::–
1305:–::–
1298:–::–
1280:–::–
1267:–::–
1192:Cshay
2370:ZLEA
2356:talk
2325:ZLEA
2319:Done
2170:talk
2155:talk
2151:Smjg
2134:$ 50
2130:$ 20
2126:$ 10
2079:talk
2042:talk
2005:talk
1967:talk
1942:talk
1921:talk
1888:talk
1860:talk
1834:talk
1804:talk
1770:talk
1755:talk
1740:talk
1719:talk
1700:talk
1659:talk
1602:talk
1586:Sudo
1571:talk
1548:talk
1518:talk
1509:and
1496:talk
1246:talk
1224:talk
1196:talk
1180:talk
1166:talk
1139:talk
1118:talk
1103:talk
1095:have
1068:talk
1052:talk
1031:talk
1007:talk
978:talk
874:here
861:talk
828:talk
746:talk
695:talk
644:Rory
627:talk
609:see
596:Rory
585:gold
560:talk
536:talk
453:talk
393:1969
366:talk
357:Done
342:talk
273:High
243:and
2237:RfC
2207:to
2122:$ 5
2118:$ 2
2114:$ 1
1025:. -
995:.
328:At
158:Low
2395::
2358:)
2322:-
2250:.
2245:}}
2241:{{
2172:)
2157:)
2140:."
2132:,
2128:,
2124:,
2120:,
2116:,
2112::
2081:)
2044:)
2007:)
1969:)
1944:)
1923:)
1890:)
1862:)
1836:)
1810:)
1806:•
1772:)
1757:)
1742:)
1721:)
1702:)
1661:)
1604:)
1573:)
1550:)
1520:)
1512:--
1498:)
1248:)
1226:)
1198:)
1182:)
1168:•
1141:)
1120:)
1105:)
1070:)
1054:)
1033:)
1009:)
980:)
972:--
918:IF
863:)
834:)
830:|
748:)
730:--
697:)
629:)
562:)
538:)
496:--
455:)
430:--
368:)
344:)
309:).
194::
2381:\
2376:T
2354:(
2336:\
2331:T
2282:)
2278:(
2265:.
2258:.
2168:(
2153:(
2077:(
2040:(
2003:(
1965:(
1940:(
1919:(
1886:(
1858:(
1832:(
1802:(
1768:(
1753:(
1738:(
1717:(
1698:(
1657:(
1600:(
1569:(
1546:(
1516:(
1494:(
1244:(
1222:(
1194:(
1178:(
1164:(
1137:(
1116:(
1101:(
1066:(
1050:(
1029:(
1005:(
976:(
867:.
859:(
826:(
744:(
693:(
647:☺
642:—
639:?
625:(
599:☺
594:—
558:(
534:(
451:(
364:(
340:(
285:.
170:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.