Talk:Left-libertarianism/Archive 2

1066:

page on wikipedia, it is full of non-anarchists who are significant libertarian socialists, who are clearly also notable within this wider current of left libertarianism ("autonomism, communalism, participism, revolutionary syndicalism, and libertarian Marxist philosophies such as council communism and Luxemburgism" in the lede, then social ecology, the New Left and within the mainstream labour movement later in the article). I strongly think this broad left libertarian current, the current Goodway talks about, needs to be mentioned right at the start of the article, with both anarchism and libertarianism situated within it. I shall therefore at some point take up your suggestion to add to that section to ensure weight is where it is due.

1030:, David Goodway states that "'Libertarian' and 'libertarianism' are frequently employed by anarchists as synonyms for 'anarchist' and 'anarchism', largely as an attempt to distance themselves from the negative connotations of 'anarchy' and its derivatives. The situation has been vastly complicated in recent decades with the rise of anarcho-capitalism, 'minimal statism' and an extreme right-wing laissez-faire philosophy advocated by such theorists as Murray Rothbard and Robert Nozick and their adoption of the words 'libertarian' and 'libertarianism'. It has therefore no become necessary to distinguish between their right libertarianism and the left libertarianism of the anarchist tradition." — 171:, from Minor Compositions/Autonomedia), even though claims throughout the section are then referenced to books, magazines, and publications from academic presses. The eradication of the section is then described as being a simple deletion of "unsourced material." It is hard to know what to make of this; it looks uncomfortably like deliberate misdirection from an editor who wants to conceal the extent and the motivations of the deletions being made. In any case, the section on left-wing market anarchism clearly is relevant to contemporary printed usage of the term "left-libertarianism," and clearly belongs in this article. 246:, half an hour later, deleted 3 paragraphs of text, including all the remaining discussion of left-wing market anarchism, amounting to a deletion of 5,703 bytes was also carried out without any discussion or justification on the Talk: page, and was explained in your edit note with nothing more than the following: "Removed section. The first sentence is sourced to a blog. The second is tagged." As I will discuss below, this is a wild irrelevancy, but even if it were clearly on point, if you think that this is anything like an explanation or an adequate discussion for deleting not only those two sentences, but 237:, deleted 11 paragraphs of text, totaling 14,075 bytes, with no discussion whatever on the Talk: page, and with no discussion whatever of your reasons for deleting this much material other than the single word "Cleanup." Some content similar to some of what you deleted was later re-added when you rewrote the section on mutualism; the content contained in the discussions of Hodgskin, Tucker, Agorism, etc. was not re-added, nor did you make any attempt to discuss this with other editors or to justify your deletions. 2423:"Scholars representing this school of left-libertarianism often understand their position in contrast to right-libertarians, who maintain that there are no fair share constraints on use or appropriation that individuals have the power to appropriate unowned things by claiming them (usually by mixing their labor with them) and deny any other conditions or considerations are relevant and that there is no justification for the state to redistribute resources to the needy or to overcome market failures." 376:. But even if it could not be, it's hard to see any reason why this issue would be treated as a reason to justify deleting not only the first sentence, but the subsequent 14 paragraphs of text and all mentions of a view which was repeatedly sourced elsewhere in that section. It's hard to know what even to make of this complaint other than as an opportunistic excuse to delete a view that you'd rather not see represented in this article; but if so, that kind of POV has no place in editing this article. 693:

the Nolan chart deserve this kind of extreme over-representation that you are insisting on. This is poorly-sourced, biased material. Please stop giving it top billing in this article, ahead of good, scholarly material which examines left-libertarianism on its own terms. What you have is a personal website whose importance, reliability, and objectivity is attested to by exactly no one. You really want to argue for the claim that this material is more reliable than the

1061:

non-anarchists later? Chomsky is clearly saying the terms are used differently in the US and elsewhere. Goodway's book includes several people who are very obviously not anarchists - EP Thompson, William Morris and George Orwell, for example, who are far from non-notable - because he clearly uses the term left libertarianism to mean something broader than anarchism. Many anarchists emphatically reject the designation "left" (see e.g. ] and some who use the term

280:

Section" tag, (5) changing the header level for "Libertarian communism," and (6) deleting subsidiary mentions of left-wing market anarchism elsewhere in the article after you removed the section on it. Of these, the only significant constructive edit which is not contingent on the deletion of left-wing market anarchism from the article, is edit (2), which I directly addressed by re-incorporating a significant amount of your edit into the text

31: 543:

this libertarianism at the apex of freedom in two dimensions, one of which—the economic dimension—identifies freedom with laissez-faire capitalism. This information would probably work well in the section titled, "The Steiner-Vallentyne school," but I'd seriously question any association of the Nolan chart with the other left-libertarians whose traditions stem more from either American individualist anarchists or libertarian socialists. --

1193:, etc. My thought now is to expand the opening section, introducing a broad left libertarian tradition, including socialist and non-socialist, anarchist and non-anarchist currents, then note that these currents informed the New Left and social movements of the 1960s-80s, which moved into the mainstream and led to the emergence of new electoral parties such as these. Does that sound viable? 396:

appropriate solution, and worse, your way of carrying out this blanket deletion has been systematically underhanded, misdirecting and destructive of relevant and well-sourced discussions of the viewpoint. The section on left-wing market anarchism clearly is relevant to contemporary printed usage of the term "left-libertarianism," and clearly belongs in this article.

2335: 570:

libertarians as an accurate measure of political views. Although many who consider themselves libertarian, but who are left of center, mistakenly place all advocates of laissez-faire economics on the right, the subject of this article can not be exclusive to their interpretation. Neglect of the discussion makes the article biased.

202:.) Lastly, that section was poor in terms of layout and the article as a whole looks much cleaner now. If you can come up with an appropriate source for the first sentence we can discuss possibly adding back the first paragraph. The rest of the section would need to be discussed piece by piece in regards to relevance. 2492:, where primary sources, often dubiously RSes, are used to support claims that are then made in wiki voice - when the claims being made need a secondary source that's a clear RS making them. There's a lot of "X-Libertarians believe Y" in wiki voice, cited to primary source examples - that's prima facie 2551:

I'm less concerned with what its fans may think than what is explicitly said in the sources. At the end of the day, if more than half of the sources don't even use the term "left-libertarianism", then they may be useful to its ideological proponents, but they're not useful to an encyclopedic article.

1771:

All words are made up; the phrase I quoted was written by Murray Rothbard, not myself; I did not propose deleting any article. What I said what that there's a serious, historical article – that would be "libertarian socialism" – and a much less serious article, which is kind of a historical curiosity

1589:

The proponents of "Classical liberal radicalism" are not socialists and are a different kind of "libetarian" than the libertarian socialists. Both the "left-libertarian" and "libertarian socialist" labels describe heterogeneous groups and there is some overlap, but it is clearly only partial overlap.

1116:

As for your comments regarding anarchism and the (slightly) broader left-libertarian tradition, I am well aware of the various (and still minor) currents which comprise left-libertarianism. In fact, I am a social ecologist, i.e., libertarian municipalist and Communalist. These "non-anarchist" views

692:

I urge you to slow down and think about what you are doing. Now you have created a new section in the article dedicated to the Nolan Chart's description of left-libertarianism, and you have placed at the very top of the article. This article contains a lot of good sources. There is no indication that

395:

If you want to clean up the section on left-wing market anarchism, then by all means clean it up. But this is not cleaning up; it is cleaning out. I agree that many things about this entire article are a mess; but a blanket deletion of the section on left-wing market anarchism is not even remotely an

366:

The footnote is explicit that the reference to the blog post is for the limited purpose of pointing to the usage of the phrase "freed markets." (Here is the footnote: "For 'freed market,' see William Gillis, 'The Freed Market.'") It is not intended as a citation to justify the statement that "Another

1380:

Oppose. the term "Libertarian socialism" is older than "left libertarianism" and more widely used around the world. Left libertarianism is mostly used in a small literature of a few authors. I also can understand why left libertarians will also want to keep those two as separate article. Libertarian

833:

Is there no reliable source about the Nolan Chart that can be used in this "Political orientation" section? I appreciate JLMadrigal taking my advice into consideration, but I don't think it's appropriate to include this material without an explanation of what it means (what is social freedom? what

264:

You have no basis whatever to complain about this and no standing to issue demands when you summarily delete 20KB of content and erase entire senses of the article without more discussion than "Cleanup," a brief mention of sourcing issues with two sentences, etc. Nor when you respond to my reversion

1108:

to refer to "a family of political parties and movements" that are not distinct from the movements currently mentioned in the article. Therefore, listing green-libertarianism separately, which has the effect of presenting those libertarians with environmental concerns as an unique current detached

997:

is a synonym for anarchism, as multiple sources note (see below, and I can easily obtain more). Technically, anarchism is a subset of libertarian socialism, but "non-anarchist" elements within the latter are a tiny minority whose political beliefs and activism do not significantly differ from that

963:

page that it is not a generally understood as a synonym for anarchism although some do use it synonymously or as overlapping movements. It seems to me very bizarre that the historically and globally largest and most significant type of left libertarianism - libertarian socialism - is mentioned only

922:

The libertarian socialism section was deleted because, by and large, that is a synonym for anarchism and there is already a significant section detailing that philosophy, though I see now that we would do well to explicitly mention these synonyms. The green libertarianism section was deleted for a

372:

Press. There is in fact no sourcing problem at all, since (as I stated on this Talk page and as I demonstrated in a subsequent edit which you reverted), the minor point that the blog was being cited for (the origin of the phrase "freed markets") can in any case be sourced in print in the collection

350:

T"his strand of left-libertarianism tends to be rooted either in the Mutualist economics conceptutalized by Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, classical American individualist anarchism, or in a left-wing interpretation or extension of the thought of Murray Rothbard. It is typically linked with the thought of

310:

discussed under the "left-wing market anarchist" section: see for example the discussions of agorism, and of Tuckerite individualists. The section on left-wing market anarchism in this article easily satisfies the criteria listed for discussion of a viewpoint: it is easy to name prominent adherents

1073:

are not just mentioning left-libertarians and environmental policies in the same article, nor are they arguing for this being a distinct current. Rather, they are using the term left-libertarian to designate a family of political parties and movements that are currently not included in the current

1065:

partly to signal that they are not of the left. On the other hand, many on the left who are not anarchists - including libertarian socialists, but also green libertarians - describe themselves and are described by political scientists as libertarian. Again, if you look at the libertarian socialism

948:

1. Re the green stuff, surely the way to deal with sections with lack of reliable sources is to insert citation needed tags and work towards sourcing them, rather than unilaterally delete? Besides, there were actually quite a few references there, to peer reviewed scholarly articles using the term

542:

I agree with goethean that the addition was POV not only due to the phrasing ("tend to favor restriction of economic liberties."), but also in that it uses a right-libertarian model of classifying political ideologies. The Nolan chart is inherently biased toward right-libertarianism, as it places

523:

There are several issues with your addition. One, you added it to the lede. The lede is intended to summarize the article. Material which is new to the article should never be added to the lede. Two, the material is worded in a highly biased, misleading way. It is clearly written from the POV of a

1737:

Sure. Libertarian socialism describes a socialist tendency (principally anarchism) and "left-libertarianism" is a fatuous neoliberal tautology that appeared in the process of laissez-faire capitalists, in the words of Rothbard, attempting to "capture a word from the enemy." One is historical; the

1544:

Oppose: The most prominent form of "left-libertarianism" in recent scholarly writing is probably still the tendency described here as "Classical liberal radicalism," which should not be confused with socialism. And the individualist-anarchist treatment of the term "socialism" (in the writings of

1025:

s "The Week Online Interviews Chomsky", states that "The term libertarian as used in the US means something quite different from what it meant historically and still means in the rest of the world. Historically, the libertarian movement has been the anti-statist wing of the socialist movement.

371:

statement is justified, on any minimally careful reading of the paragraph, by the citations at the end of the paragraph, which directly cite examples of the view in a series of books, magazines, and academic press titles from Ashgate, Pennsylvania State University Press, and Cambridge University

279:

The edits you made after the reversion that I reverted to consisted of: (1) changing the size of the photo of Henry George, (2) re-inserting material about Mutualism under the heading of "Libertarian Socialism," (3) fiddling with the section headings of this sub-section, (4) removing an "Improve

2521:

and novel syntheses in this article, as part of a broader effort on culling OR from libertarianism-related articles. This is another one of those articles that has grown bloated with inaccurate information and unreliable sourcing, but hopefully I'll be able to work this down into something more

1300:

As presented in this article, “left-libertarianism” encompasses several different views, some of them identical with libertarian socialism, others a more specific subset of it (e.g. mutualism, which is one of many schools, and notably distinct from, e.g. anarchist communism or syndicalism), and

906:

I don't understand why the sections on green left libertarianism and on libertarian socialism have been edited out of this article. The resulting article is very skewed to a very narrow and arguably esoteric US-centric understanding of left libertarianism. In Europe, the term has a much broader

528:

restrict economic liberties. Left-libertarianism support the easing of some restrictions, and the creation of other restrictions, just as right-libertarianism does. This is a widespread misunderstanding, since libertarianism is widely equated with right-libertarianism and left-libertarianism is

2536:

Good luck with it :-) Frankly a lot of that sort of OR-riddled wikitext is just unevidenced and should be cut - but this is then protested by fans, who say it's true (and it might well be!). Finding solid sources is not easy when a lot of proponents came to a political position from non-RSes -

1060:

Of course I agree that many people use libertarianism or left libertarianism and anarchism synonymously, but many people do not. It's a lot less neat than you are suggesting. Even the examples you use show this. Ward says that anarchists used it that way for a century - but do anarchists or

606:

JLMadrigal, if you can add this information in a way that doesn't define left-libertarianism from a propertarian perspective, I'd support it. Perhaps you can preface it with a statement of its origin, i.e. that the Nolan chart is a model that is not accepted by all libertarians, especially

569:

The lede is to summarize "left-libertarianism" - which is the subject of the article. If the article fails to discuss left-libertarianism as commonly interpreted in current libertarian circles, it is incomplete, and needs to be updated. The Nolan chart is commonly accepted today among most

137:

That does summarize the following paragraphs, but I don't have a source for the statement itself, though haven't looked that hard yet. Any thoughts? Sources? I'd like to put something similar in this article if it is true and maybe a much shorter summary of what is in that section now.

858:

Indeed. Additionally, the citation that JLMadrigal provided for his addition to the article has completely failed verification. The cited source simply does not say what he is adding to the article. He is interpreting a chart based on his own ideology. His addition clearly violates

158:

to delete massive amounts of text related to left-wing market anarchism and individualist anarchism, which were carried out without any discussion whatever here on Talk, and which are hard to distinguish from deliberate vandalism. Edit notes attempt to delete entire multi-paragraph

706:

The Nolan Chart is prominent (not just a web site) I think because it provides an accurate description of the common form / meaning of libertarianism in the US. My gut feel is that it will not be as useful to provide information and context on left-libertarianism. Sincerely,

2382:

for left-libertarian definitions from individuals unaffiliated with the ideology. Also, the above citation is used like 11 times and all cited to page 227 (from the longer chapter), which sounds likely incorrect. But I'd recommend finding/using alternative citations anyway.

1155:

I think we're pretty close to agreement MisterDub. Re the green stuff: the sources in the footnote - which are secondary - all describe a series of parties as left libertarian, in ways which would be very uncontroversial in political science. Have a look at these examples:

1752:

Your argument just said that left-libertarianism doesn't really exist, it's a made-up word without any real meaning other than (in your words) "attempting to capture a word from the enemy". This is an argument saying the article should be deleted. Given that some people

990:

refers to green libertarianism/anarchism as a distinct current from other left-libertarians. The fact that left-libertarians (often) hold environmental concerns should instead be noted in the other sections, which have reliable secondary sources supporting their

1857:

Well I support the merger, but it is looking like consensus is going toward nay. I'm not going to pursue it further. Bigger issues to worry about around here. Anyone is welcome to untag...I will refrain from doing so in case someone else wants to run with this.

347:

If you actually think that this is the "most important sentence of the section," then I can only say that that is not a sane reading of the section. Every sentence following it in the paragraph is more important to the content of the section; in particular:

753:

Goethean, you are encouraged to add and reference academic studies regarding the political orientation of left-libertarianism in relation to other political viewpoints. The new section is useful for readers who need a political backdrop on the subject.

838:

article and noticed that it really doesn't have anything in the way of reliable sources either. I'm almost guessing that there are no academic sources that cover the Nolan chart, perhaps because libertarianism is a minority position. --

186:

First, don't do blanket reverts, I edited many different sections of the article. Second, I explained in my edit summary the removal of left-wing market anarchism from the article. That section was linked to the main article for

1545:

Tucker and Ernest Lesigne, and then in modern circles like those around the Center for a Stateless Society) is idiosyncratic enough that it would probably cause more confusion than clarity to lump all these things together.

1465:

Also, while mutualists considered themselves to be libertarian socialists historically (in the 19th century), I don't know how many would accept the label socialist nowadays. They are, however, definitely left-libertarian.

1109:

from the other three mentioned here, creates a false distinction. Rather, information about environmental concerns ought to be added to the appropriate section(s). And, perhaps most importantly, it would be ideal to have

1574:

That seems like a pretty un-nuanced way to analyze ideology. Has it not already been established that there are people in one category but not the other? I notice that I received no reply to my answer to your question.

381:"If you can come up with an appropriate source for the first sentence we can discuss possibly adding back the first paragraph. The rest of the section would need to be discussed piece by piece in regards to relevance." 529:

widely ignored. Third, the Nolan chart website is not such a great source that it needs to be added at all. Great sources are published by publishers known to publish scholarly material, such as university presses. —

867:

in a big way. Thus my request for him to supply the text from the cited source that he is using for his addition to the article. Given the fact that he first added this poorly sourced and biased material to the

1559:

Is there any issue one would side one way and one another? trade, tariffs, guns, abortion, jobs, religion, schools, war, if so, which side of which issue? What is the single largest difference of the two?

2440:-libertarian. He briefly mentions members of the Steiner-Vallentyne school only to dismiss them in favor of proviso Lockeanism, his version of which is the explicit source of his support for welfare. 1491:

that it is also called left-libertarianism: these are two words for the same thing. The very opening sentence of that article says: "Libertarian socialism (sometimes dubbed socialist libertarianism,

907:

application. I am adding both libertarian socialism and green left libertarianism back in. If you want to delete them, please discuss that here and seek consensus rather than simply deleting them.

945:

Sorry for slow reply due to seasonal distractions. I find MisterDub's response rather cavalier and un-Wikipedian. Surely we need to discuss and reach consensus before deleting large section?

986:

I don't think those references support what you think they do. Merely mentioning left-libertarians and environmental policies in the same article is not enough to make the claim that

891:

do not mention the Nolan Chart. If JLMadrigal thinks that I am being unfair, I suggest that he attempt to add the material to the lead of those articles and see how long it lasts. —

1610:

Do you consider the approach documented in the "Classical liberal radicalism" to be a form of socialism? I guess, more importantly, are there reliable sources to back the merger?

1301:

others (such as philosophical georgism and geolibertarianism) which are not identical at all. Trying to condense the information in this article into something that would fit in

250:

of the article, totaling 14 paragraphs and nearly 20KB, and thus deleting an entire sense of the term from being mentioned at all, then I can only say that this is far beyond

1776:

than any well defined modern political movement or tendency. And that might be okay – I don't know. In any case, the words are used quite differently, sometimes inclusively.

2378:, per his WP article, is associated with "left-libertarian" activism in a way that makes him a partisan source to cite in this article. We should be looking to independent, 2346: 458:

I still need to go through all the references and check that we aren't duplicating them unnecessarily, but I feel this is at least a significant improvement. Thanks! --

351:

scholars including Kevin Carson, Roderick T. Long, Charles Johnson, Brad Spangler, Samuel Edward Konkin III, Sheldon Richman, Chris Matthew Sciabarra, and Gary Chartier."

2433:

1) an entire book by Van Parijs (can I get a page number?) that basically advocates UBI, which is neither targeted to the needy nor meant to "overcome market failures".

1665:

Oppose: If anything, the tautological so-called "left-libertarianism" should be merged with libertarian socialism, which is by far the more serious article of the two.

265:

by blanket-reverting, thus destroying edits which directly dealt with exactly the sourcing issues that you claimed were motivating your edits. If you're going to be

2309:

It may be a naming in public discourse. Anyway is left-libertarianism the version were all drugs should be legalized, but public healthcare should be socialized? --

998:

of anarchists. The major reason for labeling this camp "Anarchism" and not "Libertarian socialism" is due to lack of sources; there are plenty of sources relating

2232: 2228: 2214: 2122: 2118: 2104: 1985: 1981: 1967: 1305:

is certain to produce editing conflicts and probably the loss of a great deal of the material here on non-socialist left-libertarian views, with no obvious gain.

872:

of the article, and then created a new section dedicated to this Nolan Chart business, it seems that his edits are quite inappropriate and should be reverted. —

600:

politician. It is biased. I have to disagree strongly with your assumption that this article needs to be written from the perspective of right-libertarianism. —

1451:

Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe that many anarchists would not necessarily identify as libertarian socialist, but they are certainly left-libertarian.

1794:

was saying the article should be deleted. I would think that saying an article is "fatuous" (your term) could be described as an argument for deleting it.

923:

lack of reliable sources. I have again removed these sections and will work toward improving the "Anarchism" section to explain its various synonyms. —

1709:

on account of not being particularly notable as a term, or, for that matter, considered redundant by typical left-wing libertarians, I might reconsider.

2370:]. "Anarchism". In Gaus, Gerald F.; D'Agostino, Fred, eds. (2012). ''The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy''. p. 227.</ref: --> 2044: 1953: 1021:

that "For a century, anarchists have used the word 'libertarian' as a synonym for 'anarchist', both as a noun and an adjective." Noam Chomsky, in

79:

To include the claim that Henry George was a left-libertarian is wrong, is NPOV, is co opting and hence is a kind of vandalism/intellectual theft.

1701:

I oppose either merge unless the reasons are stated clearly. If someone wants to argue the point that "left-libertarianism" should be merged into

2200: 1576: 1467: 1452: 1424: 2293: 508:

I dispute this claim as the chart is itself libertarian and comparative of the range of libertarian views - including left-libertarianism.

89: 1017:

states that "In its oldest sense, is a synonym either for anarchism in general or social anarchism in particular." Colin Ward writes in

1811:

Any characterization of the distinction really should be properly sourced and expressed in language more appropriate to an encyclopedia.

2430:"justification for the state to redistribute resources to the needy or to overcome market failures." The editor cites only two sources: 1903: 2090: 2328: 1529: 390:

and I will not accept the demand for "piece by piece" re-negotiation of the very existence of a section on left-wing market anarchism.

386:

This is absurd. I gave you an appropriate source for the usage claim in the first sentence, but you reverted it. Your edits are not a

59: 1923: 1437:

Agree. would the oppose please clarify the main distinction of the two? Is there any party considered one, not considered the other?

2310: 2210:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

2100:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

1963:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

1797:

Since it's clear that the article needs to distinguish the two terms, I added your description of how the terms differ to the text.

597: 429:

pulled "Agorism" and "Geolibertarianism" out of the section for market-oriented left-libertarianism and made them top-level sections

341:

Another contemporary school that self-identifies as “left-libertarian” stresses the value of radically free – or “freed” – markets.

807:, can you quote the exact wording that you are using from the site for the material that you are adding to the article? Thanks. — 1190: 489:, left-of-center libertarians put a high priority on personal liberties while tending to favor restriction of economic liberties. 1216: 1126: 1039: 932: 848: 616: 552: 467: 1634:

natural resources (land, oil, gold, vegetation) should be held in an egalitarian manner, either unowned or owned collectively.

2518: 319:, not some kind of guideline for comparing the discussion of a viewpoint and other, more general articles that it links to. ( 1933: 1913: 834:

is economic freedom?), especially since it's a model built by propertarians to promote propertarianism. I looked at the

2275: 2165: 2028: 1846: 1271: 207: 327:, which does not discuss free market anarchism at all, or even allude to the ideas except by way of a "See also" link.) 200: 2342: 1207:

Yes, that sounds like a good plan. I would just reiterate that we would prefer secondary sources for attribution. —

2354: 1802: 1762: 1513: 1404: 1369: 1182: 38: 1954:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140722145233/http://www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/tgif/workers-of-the-world-unite

311:-- for example, Tucker, Spooner, Hodgskin, Voltairine de Cleyre, Kevin Carson, Roderick Long, Gary Chartier, etc. 1580: 1471: 1456: 1428: 1230: 1198: 1079: 969: 912: 367:

contemporary school that self-identifies as 'left-libertarian' stresses the value of radically free... markets."

2231:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2121:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

1984:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

1943: 1028:

Anarchist Seeds Beneath the Snow: Left-libertarian thought and British writers from William Morris to Colin Ward

2445: 1626:

Ip address, please share the nuanced version. no, reread the lede of both articles, identical. your qualifier,

1178: 1062: 47: 17: 2297: 93: 1842: 596:

The Nolan chart is not some kind of great scholarly source. It's a private website created by David Nolan, a

2489: 2379: 2266: 2192: 2156: 2082: 2019: 1895: 1773: 1286: 1267: 269:, you're going to get some reverts in response. If you don't like this, try and take it up on the Talk page. 220: 203: 195:. Also, the first and most important sentence of the section (which qualifies its inclusion) was cited to a 155: 293:

which does not list Left-wing market anarchism anywhere in that article, meaning it carries little to zero

254:

and you are going to have to get used to people responding with reverts when you destroy that much content.

191:

which does not list Left-wing market anarchism anywhere in that article, meaning it carries little to zero

2542: 2501: 2201:

https://web.archive.org/web/20100702184359/http://klinechair.missouri.edu/on-line%20papers/LL%20Primer.doc

2188: 2078: 1957: 1533: 959:

2. Re socialism and the European left libertarianism more generally, it is very clear from looking at the

387: 2441: 2426:

That strongly implies the Steiner-Vallentyne school, "in contrast to right-libertarians", believes there

242:

Your second major deletion of content, which eliminated the left-wing market anarchism section entirely,

2314: 2250:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2238: 2140:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2128: 2003:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1991: 1798: 1758: 1728: 1702: 1692: 1648: 1565: 1509: 1485: 1442: 1400: 1365: 1338: 1324: 1302: 1281:

I agree this is a good idea, there is no real distinction made between the two terms in either article.

960: 320: 303: 290: 188: 126: 2350: 2191:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2081:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1894:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1841:

Oppose. The term "left-libertarianism" can refer to a number of non-socialist positions, ie. agorism.

1757:

try to look up left-libertarianism, the question is: to which article should this term be redirected?

1738:

other is a new phenomenon, where socialists have to explicitly remind people that they're socialists.

1904:

https://web.archive.org/web/20150317210356/http://www.progress.org/views/editorials/geoism-explained/

1816: 1615: 1595: 1550: 1226: 1194: 1075: 1007: 965: 908: 759: 659: 575: 513: 85: 2091:

https://web.archive.org/web/20080911064302/http://www.homepages.ucl.ac.uk/~uctymio/leftlibP%26PA.pdf

432:

condensed both the Steiner-Vallentyne and left-wing market anarchism sections into coherent accounts

2481:

What it says: citations to blog-level or fringe sources, synthesised into statements in wiki voice.

2471: 2374:

This citation's authorship was credited to the encyclopedia's editors, omitting its actual author.

2184: 2074: 2056: 1887: 1416: 1212: 1122: 1035: 928: 844: 716: 612: 548: 463: 130: 122: 118: 2204: 1924:

https://web.archive.org/web/20120204155505/http://libertarian-labyrinth.org/warren/1stAmAnarch.pdf

2557: 2527: 2522:

manageable. Let me know if there's anything else I can do as I make my way forward with this. --

1869: 1355: 1282: 251: 2235:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2125:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

1988:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

426:

created a "Notes" section for citations with quotes or explanations that have multiple citations

2251: 2141: 2004: 306:

does not include the phrase "left-wing market anarchism" in it. It does explicitly discuss the

2538: 2512: 2497: 2459: 1310: 401: 176: 140: 1907: 167:(issues which could be resolved simply by referring to printed discussions, such as the book 2375: 2094: 1724: 1706: 1688: 1644: 1561: 1438: 1320: 312: 294: 228:"I explained in my edit summary the removal of left-wing market anarchism from the article." 192: 2561: 2546: 2531: 2505: 2475: 2449: 2410: 2358: 2318: 2301: 2280: 2258: 2170: 2148: 2060: 2033: 2011: 1872: 1850: 1820: 1806: 1785: 1766: 1747: 1732: 1718: 1696: 1674: 1652: 1619: 1599: 1584: 1569: 1554: 1537: 1517: 1475: 1460: 1446: 1432: 1408: 1390: 1373: 1358: 1328: 1314: 1290: 1275: 1234: 1220: 1202: 1130: 1083: 1071:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Left-libertarianism&oldid=638523336#cite_note-85

1043: 973: 955:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Left-libertarianism&oldid=638523336#cite_note-86

951:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Left-libertarianism&oldid=638523336#cite_note-85

936: 916: 895: 876: 852: 811: 763: 720: 701: 663: 629: 620: 579: 556: 533: 517: 471: 405: 211: 180: 144: 133:

are all phrases which activists with a variety of perspectives have applied to their views.

97: 2493: 1927: 1812: 1611: 1604: 1591: 1546: 1386: 802: 755: 655: 571: 509: 1934:

https://web.archive.org/web/20120105095946/http://www.iaf-ifa.org/principles/english.html

1006:. I would be okay with renaming the section for technical accuracy, or if you feel that 1163: 2467: 2404: 2386: 2217:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2107:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1970:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1781: 1743: 1714: 1670: 1364:

Agree. The text of the articles do not seem to clearly distinguish one from the other.

1208: 1118: 1110: 1031: 924: 840: 608: 544: 459: 266: 113: 109: 2257:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2147:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2010:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

1914:

https://web.archive.org/web/20121104040047/http://www.progress.org/archive/fold251.htm

1157: 2553: 2523: 2394: 1859: 1680: 1345: 892: 873: 808: 698: 626: 601: 530: 436: 419: 324: 315:

is in any case a policy about the relationship between a viewpoint under discussion

1306: 888: 860: 397: 172: 949:

left libertarian to describe these currents, such as in the now deleted footnotes

1937: 654:

I have revised addition as requested by MisterDub, and was reverted by Goethean.

2224: 2114: 1977: 1395:

The fact that "only a few authors" use the term left libertarian is an argument

1166: 864: 835: 486: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2223:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2113:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1976:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1917: 1639:

abolishing authoritarian institutions that control certain means of production

1525: 1382: 884: 524:

right-libertarian. If you take left-libertarian philosophy seriously, it does

442:

added "Verify section" template to section called "Similarities with Georgism"

1944:

https://web.archive.org/web/20090609075437/http://www.mutualist.org/id32.html

1104:

Bobfrombrockley, that is precisely my point: the articles are using the term

439:, per a previous discussion (this can be reinstated by uncommenting the text) 2436:

2) an essay that does advocate welfare but whose author is a self-described

1777: 1739: 1710: 1666: 1420: 1186: 435:

hidden the history of "Left-wing market anarchism" as potentially violating

418:

All, I figured this page probably doesn't see much editor traffic, so I was

233:

Your first major deletion of content related to left-wing market anarchism,

2043:

There is a discussion / presentation of ideas that affects this article at

1263: 1256: 491: 2334: 1958:

http://www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/tgif/workers-of-the-world-unite

1947: 1174: 1160: 1074:

article. Please take a look at what they say before dismissing them.

163:

of the article on the basis of complaints about sources in the first

1069:

As for the green stuff, the articles cited in the deleted footnote

1170: 902:

Deletion of green left libertarianism and of libertarian socialism

150:

Attempted Deletion of Material on Left-wing Market Anarchism, etc.

2416:

Second paragraph of Steiner-Vallentyne section highly misleading

2290:

I don't think this has anything to do with left-libertarianism.

334:"Also, the first and most important sentence of the section ..." 2205:

http://klinechair.missouri.edu/on-line%20papers/LL%20Primer.doc

1381:

socialism on top is a major branch of socialism as a whole. --

284:, in one of my edits which you wiped out with your own revert. 25: 2341:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

2333: 1504:

say that the two are the same, why are there two articles?

1790:

I didn't say you proposed deleting an article; I said your

2195:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

2085:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1908:

http://www.progress.org/views/editorials/geoism-explained/

1898:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1415:

Oppose. The articles are no more closely related than are

1117:

should certainly be included, but accorded due weight. —

1015:

The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy

625:

It appears that he's decided to ignore us and edit war. —

302:

I do not know what could possibly justify this inference.

2095:

http://www.homepages.ucl.ac.uk/~uctymio/leftlibP%26PA.pdf

1723:

Would you point out the main difference betwixt the two?

154:

I object in the strongest terms to the recent efforts by

2462:

would you please elaborate further on the rationale for

2517:

Hey, I'm now working away at trying to cut down on the

2463: 1928:

http://libertarian-labyrinth.org/warren/1stAmAnarch.pdf

1891: 1070: 954: 950: 281: 243: 234: 2488:

of our articles on libertarianism - it all goes a bit

1607:, could you point out how they do not wholly overlap? 1010:

demands that we expand this section, please add to it.

422:

and made some sweeping changes to the article. I've:

1164:

http://www.olemiss.edu/courses/pol628/kitschelt88.pdf

964:

once in this article and in a very in passing way. --

1026:

Socialist anarchism was libertarian socialism." In

2227:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2117:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1980:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1158:

http://sf.oxfordjournals.org/content/78/2/491.short

274:"I edited many different sections of the article." 82:I've got nothing against the idea of Single Tax. 2496:. Tagging is the minimum first step, I'd think - 289:"That section was linked to the main article for 454:revised lead to accurately reflect these changes 1687:would be willing to restart this on that page? 2286:Propose removing Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism 2213:This message was posted before February 2018. 2103:This message was posted before February 2018. 1966:This message was posted before February 2018. 1938:http://www.iaf-ifa.org/principles/english.html 1264:https://en.wikipedia.org/Libertarian_socialism 1257:https://en.wikipedia.org/Libertarian_socialism 1167:http://cps.sagepub.com/content/23/2/210.short 1002:to left-libertarianism, and few, if any, for 481:The following edit was deleted as "biased". 112:article and stuck all of the following under 8: 451:added a few things to the "See also" section 317:and the subject of the article it appears in 2327:Alliance of the Libertarian Left listed at 1918:http://www.progress.org/archive/fold251.htm 2183:I have just modified one external link on 2073:I have just modified one external link on 883:Additionally, I note that the articles on 2045:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Libertarianism 1886:I have just modified 6 external links on 2484:More generally, this is an issue with a 697:or scholarly, peer-reviewed journals? — 2369:<ref name="routledge-anarchism": --> 1679:I would support either merge, perhaps 1319:agreed. i will make the change now. 1225:Cool. Will get to it at some point! -- 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2420:Consider the first, run-on sentence: 1113:instead of interpreting primary ones. 7: 2039:Discussion that affects this article 1019:Anarchism: A Very Short Introduction 1948:http://www.mutualist.org/id32.html 1161:http://www.jstor.org/stable/522545 339:Here is the sentence in question: 199:(See the unacceptable source here 114:Libertarianism#Left_libertarianism 75:Henry George was not a libertarian 24: 2187:. Please take a moment to review 2077:. Please take a moment to review 1890:. Please take a moment to review 1500:Given that the Knowledge article 598:Libertarian Party (United States) 259:"First, don't do blanket reverts" 104:Left-libertarianism as catch all? 2343:Alliance of the Libertarian Left 1344:Topics are very closely related 1169:They include groups such as the 29: 2302:16:26, 26 September 2017 (UTC) 1772:that probably says more about 1476:02:01, 30 September 2016 (UTC) 1461:01:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC) 1447:01:22, 30 September 2016 (UTC) 1433:00:26, 30 September 2016 (UTC) 1391:22:50, 26 September 2016 (UTC) 1374:19:10, 26 September 2016 (UTC) 1359:22:12, 25 September 2016 (UTC) 492:"Q8. What is the Nolan Chart?" 406:01:22, 13 September 2013 (UTC) 1: 2171:23:32, 19 December 2017 (UTC) 2061:16:25, 24 November 2017 (UTC) 937:17:58, 17 December 2014 (UTC) 917:17:27, 17 December 2014 (UTC) 212:08:08, 9 September 2013 (UTC) 181:19:21, 8 September 2013 (UTC) 98:18:59, 23 December 2011 (UTC) 2506:15:59, 21 October 2021 (UTC) 2476:06:33, 21 October 2021 (UTC) 2450:19:17, 13 October 2022 (UTC) 2411:22:42, 25 January 2020 (UTC) 1821:06:50, 12 October 2016 (UTC) 1807:17:08, 10 October 2016 (UTC) 1315:10:46, 17 October 2014 (UTC) 1291:16:26, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 1235:17:23, 10 January 2015 (UTC) 472:16:17, 21 January 2014 (UTC) 2562:17:28, 2 January 2023 (UTC) 2547:15:52, 2 January 2023 (UTC) 2532:15:48, 2 January 2023 (UTC) 2380:reliable, secondary sources 2281:13:35, 8 January 2018 (UTC) 1873:17:38, 8 October 2016 (UTC) 1851:02:55, 8 October 2016 (UTC) 1786:14:07, 7 October 2016 (UTC) 1767:13:22, 7 October 2016 (UTC) 1748:18:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC) 1733:18:10, 6 October 2016 (UTC) 1719:18:06, 6 October 2016 (UTC) 1697:18:01, 6 October 2016 (UTC) 1675:17:52, 6 October 2016 (UTC) 1653:13:30, 5 October 2016 (UTC) 1620:02:30, 7 October 2016 (UTC) 1600:05:25, 5 October 2016 (UTC) 1585:05:08, 5 October 2016 (UTC) 1570:23:55, 4 October 2016 (UTC) 1555:21:31, 4 October 2016 (UTC) 1538:18:17, 3 October 2016 (UTC) 1518:19:04, 2 October 2016 (UTC) 1409:18:53, 2 October 2016 (UTC) 1221:17:17, 9 January 2015 (UTC) 1203:14:23, 9 January 2015 (UTC) 1131:16:21, 8 January 2015 (UTC) 1084:14:45, 8 January 2015 (UTC) 1044:18:38, 6 January 2015 (UTC) 974:17:38, 6 January 2015 (UTC) 695:Encyclopedia of Libertarian 445:removed redundant wikilinks 248:deleting the entire section 2584: 2244:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2180:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2134:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2070:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1997:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1883:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1183:Nordic Green Left Alliance 145:20:45, 16 March 2013 (UTC) 2349:if you wish to do so. – 1329:09:08, 5 April 2015 (UTC) 1276:04:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC) 1063:anarchism with adjectives 896:20:32, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 877:18:42, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 853:18:33, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 812:15:06, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 764:14:44, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 721:14:28, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 702:14:17, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 664:13:10, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 630:04:14, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 621:18:17, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 580:16:43, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 557:16:14, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 534:14:32, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 518:14:05, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 448:fixed format of citations 2359:17:01, 6 June 2019 (UTC) 2345:. Please participate in 2329:Redirects for discussion 2319:18:31, 5 July 2018 (UTC) 2034:11:10, 13 May 2017 (UTC) 18:Talk:Left-libertarianism 2347:the redirect discussion 2176:External links modified 2066:External links modified 1879:External links modified 1179:Alliance '90/The Greens 607:left-libertarians? -- 221:User:Somedifferentstuff 156:User:Somedifferentstuff 2338: 1493:or left-libertarianism 1399:merging, not against. 374:Markets Not Capitalism 357:". . . was cited to a 169:Markets Not Capitalism 2337: 1703:libertarian socialism 1486:Libertarian socialism 1339:Libertarian socialism 1303:Libertarian socialism 1262:Propose merging with 1255:Propose merging with 1004:libertarian socialism 961:libertarian socialism 321:Free-market anarchism 304:Free-market anarchism 291:Free-market anarchism 189:Free-market anarchism 131:Libertarian communism 127:Libertarian socialism 42:of past discussions. 2455:OR / unreliable tags 2225:regular verification 2115:regular verification 1978:regular verification 1630:negated your reply. 1337:Proposed merge with 2215:After February 2018 2185:Left-libertarianism 2105:After February 2018 2075:Left-libertarianism 1968:After February 2018 1888:Left-libertarianism 1528:echoes my concerns 1417:left-libertarianism 988:left-libertarianism 123:Libertarian Marxism 119:Left libertarianism 2339: 2269:InternetArchiveBot 2220:InternetArchiveBot 2159:InternetArchiveBot 2110:InternetArchiveBot 2022:InternetArchiveBot 1973:InternetArchiveBot 1843:Oscar666kta420swag 1298:Strongly disagree. 1268:Lance W. Haverkamp 204:Somedifferentstuff 2519:original research 2402: 2351:Arms & Hearts 2245: 2135: 1998: 1864: 1685: 1489:explicitly states 1350: 1111:secondary sources 88:comment added by 72: 71: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2575: 2516: 2490:WP:Walled garden 2409: 2407: 2400: 2399: 2393: 2384: 2376:Roderick T. Long 2371: 2364:Roderick T. Long 2279: 2270: 2243: 2242: 2221: 2169: 2160: 2133: 2132: 2111: 2053: 2032: 2023: 1996: 1995: 1974: 1860: 1799:Skepticalgiraffe 1759:Skepticalgiraffe 1707:market anarchism 1681: 1510:Skepticalgiraffe 1401:Skepticalgiraffe 1366:Skepticalgiraffe 1346: 1106:left-libertarian 806: 713: 503: 501: 499: 494:. nolanchart.com 108:Just cleaned up 100: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2583: 2582: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2510: 2457: 2418: 2405: 2403: 2397: 2391: 2390: 2368: 2366: 2332: 2288: 2273: 2268: 2236: 2229:have permission 2219: 2193:this simple FaQ 2178: 2163: 2158: 2126: 2119:have permission 2109: 2083:this simple FaQ 2068: 2049: 2041: 2026: 2021: 1989: 1982:have permission 1972: 1896:this simple FaQ 1881: 1628:not necessarily 1577:207.161.217.209 1468:207.161.217.209 1453:207.161.217.209 1425:207.161.217.209 1342: 1260: 1227:BobFromBrockley 1195:BobFromBrockley 1076:BobFromBrockley 966:BobFromBrockley 909:BobFromBrockley 904: 800: 709: 497: 495: 490: 479: 416: 388:WP:FAITACCOMPLI 152: 106: 83: 77: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2581: 2579: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2482: 2456: 2453: 2442:Pennythugginit 2417: 2414: 2365: 2362: 2331: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2294:24.245.124.232 2287: 2284: 2263: 2262: 2255: 2208: 2207: 2199:Added archive 2177: 2174: 2153: 2152: 2145: 2098: 2097: 2089:Added archive 2067: 2064: 2040: 2037: 2016: 2015: 2008: 1961: 1960: 1952:Added archive 1950: 1942:Added archive 1940: 1932:Added archive 1930: 1922:Added archive 1920: 1912:Added archive 1910: 1902:Added archive 1880: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1854: 1853: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1795: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1642: 1636: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1587: 1541: 1540: 1521: 1520: 1497: 1496: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1463: 1435: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1377: 1376: 1341: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1294: 1293: 1259: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1191:English Greens 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1114: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1067: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1011: 995:Libertarianism 992: 979: 978: 977: 976: 957: 946: 940: 939: 903: 900: 899: 898: 880: 879: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 826: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 772: 771: 770: 769: 768: 767: 766: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 704: 677: 676: 675: 674: 673: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 667: 666: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 635: 634: 633: 632: 604: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 562: 561: 560: 559: 537: 536: 506: 505: 478: 475: 456: 455: 452: 449: 446: 443: 440: 433: 430: 427: 415: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 393: 391: 384: 382: 379: 377: 364: 362: 355: 353: 345: 343: 337: 335: 332: 330: 328: 300: 298: 287: 285: 277: 275: 272: 270: 262: 260: 257: 255: 240: 238: 231: 229: 226: 224: 215: 214: 151: 148: 110:Libertarianism 105: 102: 90:96.234.185.204 76: 73: 70: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2580: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2520: 2514: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2454: 2452: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2434: 2431: 2429: 2424: 2421: 2415: 2413: 2412: 2408: 2396: 2388: 2381: 2377: 2372: 2363: 2361: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2336: 2330: 2326: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2291: 2285: 2283: 2282: 2277: 2272: 2271: 2260: 2256: 2253: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2240: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2216: 2211: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2181: 2175: 2173: 2172: 2167: 2162: 2161: 2150: 2146: 2143: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2130: 2124: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2106: 2101: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2071: 2065: 2063: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2052: 2046: 2038: 2036: 2035: 2030: 2025: 2024: 2013: 2009: 2006: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1993: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1969: 1964: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1884: 1878: 1874: 1871: 1868: 1865: 1863: 1856: 1855: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1793: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1774:recuperation 1770: 1769: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1684: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1643: 1640: 1637: 1635: 1632: 1631: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1608: 1606: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1588: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1543: 1542: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1522: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1487: 1483: 1482: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1464: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1379: 1378: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1357: 1354: 1351: 1349: 1340: 1336: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1299: 1296: 1295: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1283:Gouncbeatduke 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1258: 1254: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1165: 1162: 1159: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1115: 1112: 1107: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1009: 1008:WP:DUE WEIGHT 1005: 1001: 996: 993: 989: 985: 984: 983: 982: 981: 980: 975: 971: 967: 962: 958: 956: 952: 947: 944: 943: 942: 941: 938: 934: 930: 926: 921: 920: 919: 918: 914: 910: 901: 897: 894: 890: 886: 882: 881: 878: 875: 871: 866: 862: 857: 856: 855: 854: 850: 846: 842: 837: 813: 810: 804: 799: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 765: 761: 757: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 722: 718: 714: 712: 705: 703: 700: 696: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 680: 679: 678: 665: 661: 657: 653: 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 643: 642: 631: 628: 624: 623: 622: 618: 614: 610: 605: 603: 599: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 589: 588: 581: 577: 573: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 558: 554: 550: 546: 541: 540: 539: 538: 535: 532: 527: 522: 521: 520: 519: 515: 511: 493: 488: 484: 483: 482: 476: 474: 473: 469: 465: 461: 453: 450: 447: 444: 441: 438: 434: 431: 428: 425: 424: 423: 421: 413: 407: 403: 399: 394: 392: 389: 385: 383: 380: 378: 375: 370: 365: 363: 360: 356: 354: 352: 346: 344: 342: 338: 336: 333: 331: 329: 326: 325:Laissez-faire 322: 318: 314: 309: 305: 301: 299: 296: 292: 288: 286: 283: 278: 276: 273: 271: 268: 263: 261: 258: 256: 253: 249: 245: 241: 239: 236: 232: 230: 227: 225: 222: 219: 218: 217: 216: 213: 209: 205: 201: 198: 194: 190: 185: 184: 183: 182: 178: 174: 170: 166: 162: 157: 149: 147: 146: 143: 142: 135: 134: 132: 128: 124: 120: 115: 111: 103: 101: 99: 95: 91: 87: 80: 74: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2539:David Gerard 2513:David Gerard 2498:David Gerard 2485: 2460:David Gerard 2458: 2437: 2435: 2432: 2427: 2425: 2422: 2419: 2373: 2367: 2340: 2292: 2289: 2267: 2264: 2239:source check 2218: 2212: 2209: 2182: 2179: 2157: 2154: 2129:source check 2108: 2102: 2099: 2072: 2069: 2050: 2048: 2042: 2020: 2017: 1992:source check 1971: 1965: 1962: 1885: 1882: 1866: 1861: 1791: 1754: 1682: 1638: 1633: 1627: 1530:172.56.2.239 1505: 1501: 1492: 1488: 1484:The artlcle 1396: 1352: 1347: 1343: 1297: 1261: 1105: 1027: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1003: 999: 994: 987: 905: 889:Conservatism 869: 832: 710: 708: 694: 525: 507: 496:. Retrieved 480: 457: 417: 414:Many changes 373: 368: 358: 349: 340: 316: 307: 247: 196: 168: 164: 160: 153: 141:CarolMooreDC 139: 136: 117: 107: 84:— Preceding 81: 78: 65: 43: 37: 2311:105.0.2.184 2047:Sincerely, 1725:Darkstar1st 1689:Darkstar1st 1645:Darkstar1st 1562:Darkstar1st 1439:Darkstar1st 1321:Darkstar1st 1023:Z Magazine' 836:Nolan chart 487:Nolan chart 477:Nolan chart 252:WP:CAUTIOUS 36:This is an 2464:these tags 2276:Report bug 2166:Report bug 2029:Report bug 1813:Libertatia 1612:Libertatia 1605:Libertatia 1592:Libertatia 1547:Libertatia 991:inclusion. 885:Liberalism 803:JLMadrigal 756:JLMadrigal 656:JLMadrigal 572:JLMadrigal 510:JLMadrigal 437:due weight 2494:synthesis 2468:Pfhorrest 2389:, please 2259:this tool 2252:this tool 2149:this tool 2142:this tool 2051:North8000 2012:this tool 2005:this tool 1421:anarchism 1209:MisterDub 1187:GreenLeft 1119:MisterDub 1032:MisterDub 1000:anarchism 925:MisterDub 841:MisterDub 711:North8000 609:MisterDub 545:MisterDub 460:MisterDub 323:links to 313:WP:WEIGHT 308:positions 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 2554:Grnrchst 2524:Grnrchst 2387:watching 2265:Cheers.— 2155:Cheers.— 2018:Cheers.— 1862:Pariah24 1792:argument 1683:Pariah24 1524:Oppose. 1495:) is..." 1348:Pariah24 1217:contribs 1127:contribs 1040:contribs 933:contribs 893:goethean 874:goethean 849:contribs 809:goethean 699:goethean 627:goethean 617:contribs 602:goethean 553:contribs 531:goethean 498:March 5, 485:"On the 468:contribs 165:sentence 161:sections 86:unsigned 2189:my edit 2079:my edit 1892:my edit 1307:Radgeek 398:Radgeek 267:WP:BOLD 223:writes: 173:Radgeek 39:archive 1502:itself 1189:, the 1175:Agalev 295:weight 193:weight 2438:right 2385:(not 1526:Eduen 1506:Merge 1383:Eduen 1171:Ecolo 861:WP:OR 359:blog. 197:blog. 16:< 2558:talk 2543:talk 2528:talk 2502:talk 2472:talk 2466:? -- 2446:talk 2406:czar 2395:ping 2355:talk 2315:talk 2298:talk 2057:talk 1847:talk 1817:talk 1803:talk 1782:talk 1763:talk 1755:will 1744:talk 1729:talk 1715:talk 1705:and 1693:talk 1671:talk 1649:talk 1616:talk 1596:talk 1581:talk 1566:talk 1551:talk 1534:talk 1514:talk 1472:talk 1457:talk 1443:talk 1429:talk 1419:and 1405:talk 1387:talk 1370:talk 1325:talk 1311:talk 1287:talk 1272:talk 1231:talk 1213:talk 1199:talk 1123:talk 1080:talk 1036:talk 1013:The 970:talk 953:and 929:talk 913:talk 887:and 870:lead 865:WP:V 863:and 845:talk 760:talk 717:talk 660:talk 613:talk 576:talk 549:talk 514:talk 500:2014 464:talk 420:bold 402:talk 369:That 282:here 244:here 235:here 208:talk 177:talk 129:and 94:talk 2552:-- 2486:lot 2233:RfC 2203:to 2123:RfC 2093:to 1986:RfC 1956:to 1946:to 1936:to 1926:to 1916:to 1906:to 1397:for 526:not 2560:) 2545:) 2530:) 2504:) 2474:) 2448:) 2428:is 2398:}} 2392:{{ 2357:) 2317:) 2300:) 2246:. 2241:}} 2237:{{ 2136:. 2131:}} 2127:{{ 2059:) 1999:. 1994:}} 1990:{{ 1849:) 1819:) 1805:) 1784:) 1778:fi 1765:) 1746:) 1740:fi 1731:) 1717:) 1711:fi 1695:) 1673:) 1667:fi 1651:) 1618:) 1598:) 1583:) 1568:) 1553:) 1536:) 1516:) 1508:. 1474:) 1459:) 1445:) 1431:) 1423:. 1407:) 1389:) 1372:) 1327:) 1313:) 1289:) 1274:) 1266:-- 1233:) 1219:) 1215:| 1201:) 1185:, 1181:, 1177:, 1173:, 1129:) 1125:| 1082:) 1042:) 1038:| 972:) 935:) 931:| 915:) 851:) 847:| 762:) 719:) 662:) 619:) 615:| 578:) 555:) 551:| 516:) 470:) 466:| 404:) 297:." 210:) 179:) 125:, 121:, 116:: 96:) 2556:( 2541:( 2526:( 2515:: 2511:@ 2500:( 2470:( 2444:( 2401:) 2353:( 2313:( 2296:( 2278:) 2274:( 2261:. 2254:. 2168:) 2164:( 2151:. 2144:. 2055:( 2031:) 2027:( 2014:. 2007:. 1870:☏ 1867:┃ 1845:( 1815:( 1801:( 1780:( 1761:( 1742:( 1727:( 1713:( 1691:( 1669:( 1647:( 1641:. 1614:( 1594:( 1579:( 1564:( 1549:( 1532:( 1512:( 1470:( 1455:( 1441:( 1427:( 1403:( 1385:( 1368:( 1356:☏ 1353:┃ 1323:( 1309:( 1285:( 1270:( 1229:( 1211:( 1197:( 1121:( 1078:( 1034:( 968:( 927:( 911:( 843:( 805:: 801:@ 758:( 715:( 658:( 611:( 574:( 547:( 512:( 504:" 502:. 462:( 400:( 361:" 206:( 175:( 92:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index