42:
261:
Failing this article because I don't think that it was sufficiently prepared for being nominated to be a Good
Article. There are issues with sourcing, comprehensiveness and referencing. I'm sure there must be more info than there currently is. This article does not satisfy the criteria at the present
231:
The screenshot of
Screenshot of LilyPond running on Linux needs to be on the left and placed at the top of the Design section, as it is currently defaulting to under the info box
80:
70:
47:
228:
I don't see the point of having one sentence sub sections for
Version 1.0 and Version 2.0. Just add these to the end of the History section para.
240:
Another scorewriter with comparable features to LilyPond is SCORE, but SCORE relies on manual positioning more than
Lilypond does. → Unsourced
219:
You could use the {{hlist|}} for the language in the info box: {{hlist|English|Dutch|French|German|Hungarian|Italian|Japanese|Spanish}}
75:
126:
203:
252:
Looking at the history of the article, I don't really think you've done must to improve it. There are a handful of minor changes.
156:
52:
122:
107:
178:
99:
208:
173:
237:
One benefit of this is that more than one language can be included in the same source file. → Unsourced
150:
225:
The lead really isn't giving a broad enough overview of the rest of the article, it's too short.
262:
stage. It needs a lot of work, more than I believe is worth putting on hold for 7 days for. —
168:
263:
191:
146:
115:
17:
213:
I'd add a hatnote to the top of the article saying {{Distinguish|Lily Pond}}
92:
234:
Try to avoid single sentence/line paragraphs. There are a lot of them.
268:
196:
184:
160:
243:
There are inconsistencies in the date formatting in the references.
134:
103:
216:
You don't need to say "; 20 years ago" in the info box
249:
Is ref 14 supposed to have a red link for the name?
8:
190:I will do it this weekend, don't worry. —
30:
61:
33:
7:
246:Most are missing a work or publisher
222:These should be alphabetically too
24:
1:
166:When are you going to begin?
284:
269:08:43, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
197:21:09, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
185:19:43, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
161:07:55, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
204:Quite a few dead links
89:
88:
275:
181:
176:
171:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
283:
282:
278:
277:
276:
274:
273:
272:
179:
174:
169:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
281:
279:
259:
258:
254:
253:
250:
247:
244:
241:
238:
235:
232:
229:
226:
223:
220:
217:
214:
211:
206:
200:
199:
165:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
280:
271:
270:
267:
266:
256:
255:
251:
248:
245:
242:
239:
236:
233:
230:
227:
224:
221:
218:
215:
212:
210:
209:Some dablinks
207:
205:
202:
201:
198:
195:
194:
189:
188:
187:
186:
183:
182:
177:
172:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
18:Talk:LilyPond
264:
260:
192:
167:
164:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
104:visual edit
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
265:Calvin999
193:Calvin999
147:Calvin999
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
157:contribs
76:Criteria
257:Outcome
127:history
108:history
94:Article
170:Peter
136:Watch
16:<
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
180:Fan
175:Sam
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.