360:
1204:
links to individual articles about RAF Squadrons, this article does not link to articles about individual ATC squadrons but merely links to place names, where the articles have no content about the ATC, so would seem tenuous at the very least. I was the original author for this article after being asked to move the drivel it has become as it did not meet Wiki standards. Nobody has bothered to do anything with it apart from adding place names, therefore I have now added a speedy delete tag to this and it will be due to be deleted today.
408:
376:
467:
229:
124:
21:
344:
279:
95:
187:
155:
301:
290:
268:
257:
716:
A lot of people have had problems editing this page as you can see from the edit section. Not all squadrons have been put in the table etc. because of bad formatting. I trying to clean up some of this (mainly 3 welsh wing at the moment as i'm in it) but will try to clean up more when i've got time.
1203:
The PROD has been moved by one editor (Colonel Bogey/Blimp whatever he calls himself) he has not bothered to justify he reasons which fly's in the face of WP conventions, he did however when challenged gave the article List of RAF Squadrons as an example why this one should stay. However that list
643:
I tend to patrol the atc pages. I'm in the organisation myself. Don't forget if you create an article. Don't forget it must be notable, verifiable and it must not read like an advertisement as previous squadron articles have sounded like. Regarding naming i suggest something based like this 360
698:
Yes, it appears that a lot of contributors to this article are having difficulties editing the tables. It has to be said the layout of the tables doesn't make this easy. I suggest a better layout would be to have one row for each wing, with a sorted list of squadrons for each wing. Given the
1223:
G7 applies here, it only applies "provided that the only substantial content to the page and to the associated talk page was added by its author". There have been many contributors to this article since it was created on 25 February 2008 by
383:
173:
837:
Excellent! I was going to do something similar myself, but the amount of work involved was putting me off! One suggestion I'd make is to use multiple columns (maybe two or three) to reduce the amount of blank space in the page - see
367:
169:
58:
105:
351:
165:
1091:
There is a great blank space down the right hand side of this article. Perhaps this could be filled with the pictures of each wing/regions emblem/flag. If someone could upload some images that would be great.
621:
was created and speedily deleted unfortunately (I have asked for it to be brought back). I was wondering if the article would be called 2352 (Stone) squadron Air
Training Corps or No. 2352 (Stone) squadron
1363:
474:
52:
1358:
1353:
1348:
1343:
242:
199:
228:
1064:
No, wikipedia is not a collection of external links. I will be linking the location of each squadron to an article on wikipedia concerning that village/town/city.
1338:
1333:
1328:
1171:
Not sure that the article has any encyclopedic value I am sure it breaks a lot of guidelines about list for the sake of it. Would be better as an article about
1142:
I was wondering what was meant by filling up the page. I use IE and it still looks the same. I still believe pictures would give the article a better feel.
194:
160:
733:
Problem - Some of the squadrons I've seen are not even in the right wing. Anyone know where I could find a list of squadrons and they're wings?
1175:
which could give some background into the how they are organised, established and closed. It has no historic information at all. Any thoughts.
1029:
This article is looking much better now. All it needs is the locations of the squadrons to be linked to articles, which i shall start myself.
203:
1302:
664:
483:
73:
1127:
I've just noticed the templates I used to do this only work in certain web browsers - for instance, they have no effect in IE7 or Opera.
1049:
Ummm - part of the new formatting was to remove the numerous links to the actual squadrons - your not going to start that again are you?
1150:
1100:
1072:
1037:
979:
40:
939:
While including external links to individual squadron websites may be useful, WP isn't really the right place to do this, according to
513:
699:
different numbers of squadrons in each wing it doesn't make sense to have a fixed number of columns (or rows in the current layout).
688:
135:
34:
499:
1259:
I can't find any sources but it looks as though 41DF (Wellington) has been disbanded/doesn't exist. Can anyone confirm? --
1235:
1189:
I agree with this, if its not added to in any substantial way then I would expect it to be up for deletion by years end.
30:
449:
101:
685:
445:
1112:
Someone has filled this by using coloums witch made the page fill up a bit more - well done to whoever did that.
80:
1172:
472:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
1278:
I can't find any sources but it looks as though 2340 (Blandford Forum) has been disbanded. Can anyone confirm? --
1143:
1093:
1065:
1030:
972:
545:
668:
359:
141:
198:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
529:
503:
1209:
1194:
915:
All done. Letdorf, colud you add the DMOZ link to the new version of the page, it wouldn't work for me...
1303:
https://www.raf.mod.uk/aircadets/find-a-squadron/south-west/plymouth-cornwall-wing-hq/2533-wadebridge-df/
808:
The table format has been removed, as this was getting very messy as people didn't know how to format it.
678:
I agree. Does the table format work on this page? Perhaps it should just be split into the ATC regions..
488:
453:
46:
1180:
940:
857:{{Dmoz|Regional/Europe/United_Kingdom/Government/Defence/Cadets/Air_Training_Corps|Air Training Corps}}
1118:
1055:
1014:
920:
906:
888:
824:
771:
738:
722:
605:
What do you mean by naming format, as in how are the squadrons iven names, or how are they numbered?
1314:
1287:
1268:
1247:
1213:
1198:
1184:
1156:
1136:
1122:
1106:
1078:
1059:
1043:
1018:
1003:
985:
960:
924:
892:
877:
828:
789:
775:
760:
742:
726:
708:
691:
672:
650:
638:
611:
600:
94:
682:
66:
1225:
618:
535:
466:
1114:
1051:
1010:
991:
916:
898:
884:
820:
767:
734:
718:
1310:
1283:
1264:
1243:
1229:
1205:
1190:
1132:
999:
956:
873:
785:
756:
704:
627:
589:
1176:
407:
1220:
416:
944:
766:
Ah. That helps. bit awkward thought as it won't let you sort by squadron. thanks anyway
679:
375:
1322:
883:
Yep - about to do that now. It hasn't been changed recently as ive been away. Thanks
1306:
1279:
1260:
1239:
1128:
995:
952:
869:
839:
812:
781:
752:
700:
623:
585:
563:
551:
519:
498:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
1298:
646:
607:
842:. This shouldn't really make it any harder to edit. Also an external link to
802:
780:
You can sort by squadron number by clicking on the
Squadron column heading.
444:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
971:
This article has a really bad format. It needs to be totally rewritten.
343:
644:(Llwchwr) Squadron. Thats the standard in the corps. Hope that helps.
1305:). Any ideas about what the case is or how it should be described? --
186:
154:
948:
843:
461:
402:
117:
89:
15:
1301:), but on the MOD squadron finder and their logo it is 2533 (
751:
See the
Squadron Finder under External links in the article.
492:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments,
374:
358:
342:
227:
482:
among
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. Knowledge (XXG) has
65:
663:
This page is a bit of a mess. Is anyone on the case?
240:
This article has been checked against the following
325:
239:
79:
1364:Knowledge (XXG) articles that use British English
1009:Actually, it's been finished - again, see above.
584:What is the naming format for these squadrons?--
803:http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Ziaix/atcsquadrons
994:is working on a reformatted page - see above.
1359:European military history task force articles
1354:List-Class European military history articles
1299:https://www.facebook.com/wadebridgeaircadets/
512:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected
8:
1349:British military history task force articles
1344:List-Class British military history articles
212:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
1297:On their social media, they go under 1942 (
486:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
420:, which has its own spelling conventions (
322:
236:
149:
123:
121:
104:on 13 February 2012 (UTC). The result of
811:The numerous links hav been removed, as
506:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
192:This article is within the scope of the
1293:1942 (Wadebridge) or 2533 (Wadebridge)?
868:would be a good thing to have. Cheers!
151:
202:. To use this banner, please see the
1339:Military aviation task force articles
1334:List-Class military aviation articles
452:, this should not be changed without
215:Template:WikiProject Military history
7:
1329:List-Class military history articles
384:European military history task force
368:British military history task force
140:It is of interest to the following
14:
1274:2340 (Blandford Forum) disbanded?
465:
406:
299:
288:
277:
266:
255:
185:
153:
122:
93:
19:
100:This article was nominated for
1248:12:21, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
1214:11:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
1199:23:40, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
897:All done!!! Wooo! (see below)
709:12:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
1:
1185:11:28, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
1157:22:48, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
1137:00:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
1123:18:48, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
1079:19:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
1060:18:48, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
502:on the part of others and to
1255:41DF (Wellington) disbanded?
1173:Air Training Corps squadrons
1107:18:07, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
1044:18:04, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
1019:17:07, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
1004:12:02, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
986:11:40, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
961:12:57, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
925:16:49, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
893:14:54, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
878:14:23, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
829:13:20, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
790:21:39, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
776:13:20, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
761:20:51, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
743:20:35, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
727:20:20, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
352:Military aviation task force
195:Military history WikiProject
1315:10:39, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
1288:10:28, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
1269:10:20, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
951:as a suitable alternative.
692:18:52, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
1380:
260:Referencing and citation:
801:I've redone this page at
673:21:04, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
651:22:47, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
639:01:04, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
612:16:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
601:14:50, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
382:
366:
350:
321:
218:military history articles
180:
148:
544:; accounts blocked for
514:single-purpose accounts
484:policies and guidelines
326:Associated task forces:
271:Coverage and accuracy:
379:
363:
347:
304:Supporting materials:
232:
130:This article is rated
378:
362:
346:
231:
134:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1145:Gaia Octavia Agrippa
1095:Gaia Octavia Agrippa
1067:Gaia Octavia Agrippa
1032:Gaia Octavia Agrippa
974:Gaia Octavia Agrippa
450:relevant style guide
446:varieties of English
496:by counting votes.
475:not a majority vote
448:. According to the
293:Grammar and style:
246:for B-class status:
380:
364:
348:
233:
200:list of open tasks
136:content assessment
577:
576:
573:
500:assume good faith
460:
459:
401:
400:
397:
396:
393:
392:
389:
388:
317:
316:
306:criterion not met
295:criterion not met
273:criterion not met
262:criterion not met
204:full instructions
116:
115:
88:
87:
1371:
1153:
1146:
1121:
1103:
1096:
1075:
1068:
1058:
1040:
1033:
982:
975:
636:
633:
598:
595:
571:
559:
543:
527:
508:
478:, but instead a
469:
462:
413:This article is
410:
403:
333:
323:
307:
303:
302:
296:
292:
291:
285:
281:
280:
274:
270:
269:
263:
259:
258:
237:
220:
219:
216:
213:
210:
209:Military history
189:
182:
181:
176:
161:Military history
157:
150:
133:
127:
126:
125:
118:
97:
90:
84:
83:
69:
23:
22:
16:
1379:
1378:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1319:
1318:
1295:
1276:
1257:
1169:
1155:
1151:
1144:
1113:
1105:
1101:
1094:
1089:
1077:
1073:
1066:
1050:
1042:
1038:
1031:
1027:
1025:Looking good :)
984:
980:
973:
969:
937:
661:
634:
631:
596:
593:
582:
561:
549:
533:
517:
504:sign your posts
454:broad consensus
417:British English
331:
305:
300:
294:
289:
283:
278:
272:
267:
261:
256:
217:
214:
211:
208:
207:
163:
131:
26:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1377:
1375:
1367:
1366:
1361:
1356:
1351:
1346:
1341:
1336:
1331:
1321:
1320:
1294:
1291:
1275:
1272:
1256:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1219:I don't think
1168:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1149:
1099:
1088:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1071:
1036:
1026:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1007:
978:
968:
965:
936:
935:External links
933:
932:
931:
930:
929:
928:
927:
910:
881:
863:
862:
861:
860:
859:
858:
850:
849:
848:
847:
832:
831:
818:
817:
816:
809:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
764:
746:
745:
730:
729:
713:
712:
695:
694:
665:90.240.102.254
660:
659:Needs Clean Up
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
581:
578:
575:
574:
470:
458:
457:
411:
399:
398:
395:
394:
391:
390:
387:
386:
381:
371:
370:
365:
355:
354:
349:
339:
338:
336:
334:
328:
327:
319:
318:
315:
314:
312:
310:
309:
308:
297:
286:
275:
264:
250:
249:
247:
234:
224:
223:
221:
190:
178:
177:
158:
146:
145:
139:
128:
114:
113:
106:the discussion
98:
86:
85:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1376:
1365:
1362:
1360:
1357:
1355:
1352:
1350:
1347:
1345:
1342:
1340:
1337:
1335:
1332:
1330:
1327:
1326:
1324:
1317:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1292:
1290:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1273:
1271:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1254:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1234:
1231:
1227:
1222:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1201:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1187:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1167:Article value
1166:
1158:
1154:
1147:
1141:
1140:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1104:
1097:
1086:
1080:
1076:
1069:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1041:
1034:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
990:
989:
988:
987:
983:
976:
966:
964:
962:
958:
954:
950:
946:
942:
934:
926:
922:
918:
914:
913:*edit* Almost
911:
908:
904:
903:
902:
896:
895:
894:
890:
886:
882:
879:
875:
871:
867:
866:
865:
864:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
845:
841:
836:
835:
834:
833:
830:
826:
822:
819:
814:
810:
807:
806:
804:
800:
799:
791:
787:
783:
779:
778:
777:
773:
769:
765:
762:
758:
754:
750:
749:
748:
747:
744:
740:
736:
732:
731:
728:
724:
720:
715:
714:
710:
706:
702:
697:
696:
693:
690:
687:
684:
681:
677:
676:
675:
674:
670:
666:
658:
652:
649:
648:
642:
641:
640:
629:
625:
620:
616:
615:
614:
613:
610:
609:
603:
602:
591:
587:
579:
569:
565:
557:
553:
547:
541:
537:
531:
525:
521:
515:
511:
507:
505:
501:
495:
491:
490:
485:
481:
477:
476:
471:
468:
464:
463:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
418:
412:
409:
405:
404:
385:
377:
373:
372:
369:
361:
357:
356:
353:
345:
341:
340:
337:
335:
330:
329:
324:
320:
313:
311:
298:
287:
284:criterion met
276:
265:
254:
253:
252:
251:
248:
245:
244:
238:
235:
230:
226:
225:
222:
205:
201:
197:
196:
191:
188:
184:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
162:
159:
156:
152:
147:
143:
137:
129:
120:
119:
111:
107:
103:
99:
96:
92:
91:
82:
78:
75:
72:
68:
64:
60:
57:
54:
51:
48:
45:
42:
39:
36:
32:
29:
28:Find sources:
25:
18:
17:
1296:
1277:
1258:
1238:). Regards,
1232:
1206:Pandaplodder
1202:
1191:Pandaplodder
1188:
1170:
1090:
1028:
970:
938:
912:
900:
899:
840:Help:Columns
813:user:Letdorf
662:
645:
606:
604:
583:
567:
555:
546:sockpuppetry
539:
528:; suspected
523:
509:
497:
493:
487:
479:
473:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
414:
241:
193:
142:WikiProjects
109:
76:
70:
62:
55:
49:
43:
37:
27:
1177:MilborneOne
941:WP:LINKFARM
619:2352sqn atc
617:An article
415:written in
282:Structure:
53:free images
1323:Categories
992:User:Ziaix
815:suggested.
480:discussion
132:List-class
947:suggests
536:canvassed
530:canvassed
489:consensus
426:travelled
1236:contribs
1087:Pictures
580:Untitled
568:username
562:{{subst:
556:username
550:{{subst:
540:username
534:{{subst:
524:username
518:{{subst:
438:artefact
243:criteria
174:European
166:Aviation
102:deletion
1307:Aluxosm
1280:Aluxosm
1261:Aluxosm
1240:Letdorf
1226:WDT-MSP
1129:Letdorf
996:Letdorf
953:Letdorf
870:Letdorf
782:Letdorf
753:Letdorf
701:Letdorf
624:mrg3105
586:mrg3105
532:users:
442:analyse
434:defence
170:British
59:WP refs
47:scholar
1221:WP:CSD
1119:(Talk)
1056:(Talk)
967:Format
846:, ie.:
647:Seddσn
608:Seddσn
430:centre
422:colour
138:scale.
31:Google
1115:Ziaix
1052:Ziaix
1011:Ziaix
945:WP:EL
917:Ziaix
901:Ziaix
885:Ziaix
821:Ziaix
768:Ziaix
735:Ziaix
719:Ziaix
628:comms
622:RAF--
590:comms
510:Note:
74:JSTOR
35:books
1311:talk
1284:talk
1265:talk
1244:talk
1230:talk
1210:talk
1195:talk
1181:talk
1152:Sign
1133:talk
1102:Sign
1074:Sign
1039:Sign
1015:talk
1000:talk
981:Sign
957:talk
949:DMOZ
921:talk
907:talk
889:talk
874:talk
844:DMOZ
825:talk
786:talk
772:talk
757:talk
739:talk
723:talk
705:talk
669:talk
110:keep
108:was
67:FENS
41:news
680:Jez
630:) ♠
592:) ♠
564:csp
560:or
552:csm
520:spa
494:not
81:TWL
1325::
1313:)
1286:)
1267:)
1246:)
1212:)
1197:)
1183:)
1148:|
1139:.
1135:)
1117:|
1098:|
1070:|
1054:|
1035:|
1017:)
1002:)
977:|
963:.
959:)
943:.
923:)
891:)
876:)
827:)
805:.
788:)
774:)
759:)
741:)
725:)
707:)
671:)
637:♣
599:♣
570:}}
558:}}
548::
542:}}
526:}}
516::
440:,
436:,
432:,
428:,
424:,
332:/
172:/
168:/
164::
61:)
1309:(
1282:(
1263:(
1250:.
1242:(
1233:·
1228:(
1208:(
1193:(
1179:(
1131:(
1013:(
1006:.
998:(
955:(
919:(
909:)
905:(
887:(
880:.
872:(
823:(
792:.
784:(
770:(
763:.
755:(
737:(
721:(
711:.
703:(
689:✍
686:✉
683:☎
667:(
635:♦
632:♥
626:(
597:♦
594:♥
588:(
572:.
566:|
554:|
538:|
522:|
456:.
206:.
144::
112:.
77:·
71:·
63:·
56:·
50:·
44:·
38:·
33:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
