852:
I don't see it as being a hole. There are also the
Conservative/Lib-Con governments, which are here called "coalitions" and have a footnote explaining them, but I guess could be a bit clearer. You might also be thinking of the 15th Parliament, where the Conservatives had the most seats, but the Liberals formed government because they had the support of the minor parties; in that case they didn't form an official coalition. Is there are way you think these cases could be better explained than through the footnotes? --
224:
21:
339:
318:
156:
349:
290:
58:
444:
423:
214:
187:
851:
No coalition with a minor party has ever "taken over" parliament. All government have been formed by either the
Liberals or the Conservatives. The only coalition was during WW1 between those two parties in the 13th Parliament, and that one has both a footnote and its own article that are linked, so
715:
I want to add a column about what other parties had official party status in each parliament. However, if we make the list any wider it won't show up right on small menitors, so would anyone oppose getting rid of the speakers column? Who the speaker is isn't really a critical piece of information
567:
When do people think that we should start calling the "Conservative/Liberal-Conservative" just "Conservative"? Do we bother using both names when the coalition is in opposition? Do we use the full name when the "Conservatives" had enough seats to have formed government by themselves without the
644:
Good points. I've added the word "federal" to the first line and linked it, but I may have to be a bit clearer. I'm worried about making the list any wider, as people with smaller monitors were having problems viewing it when it was any bigger; also, I personally like the two lines below the
111:
949:
In the First
Parliament, following the general election of 1867, the Members who sat in the House opposite the government of Sir John A. Macdonald did not constitute a party but a coalition of various interests, just as the government did
126:
35:
827:
What parties make up the coalition? I heard that a major party and and minor party joined together to take over parliament in Canada? What is the voting block? Seems this is a major hole in the info on this page.
798:
521:
96:
1092:
765:
I'm going to (in the next few days), begin adding the
Canadian Senators (past & present), to the 1st through 39th Canadian Parliments. It will take a long, long, long time. Put I'll give it a try.
1050:
I've never edited
Knowledge, and I also don't know where the images originally came from, so I don't know how to fix this. I can poke at it a bit though, I see some of the images say stuff like: : -->
1087:
542:
It looks somewhat messy in the parliaments where the ruling party changed. Is there some way to make all of the years line up with each other (other than turning the thing into a table)? -
568:
help of the "Liberal-Conservatives"? In the 12th
Canadian Parliament, the "Liberal-Conservatives" only had one seat, but they were still part of the coalition, do we use the name then?
654:
Thank you for the first point. As for the second, I didn't mean to create new colums, but to widen just a litlle bit the "Parliament and election" columns because it appears like this:
1112:
689:
It looks like the biggest problem is that it's treating "Liberal-Conservative Party" as only two words, so it won't break them up. I'll add a space on either side of the dash. --
680:
Well, that's no good. I've widened the first column a bit. Tweek it some more if it still looks bad on your display, or ask me to do it if you don't know the table code. --
64:
775:
Most of them don't even have lists of MPs. I would think the lists of lower house members would be a priority if you want to spend that much time on these articles. --
1107:
1102:
270:
299:
197:
1127:
1097:
405:
395:
1064:...so maybe the ones with missing descriptions just need to be tracked down on Wikimedia Commons and the descriptions copied over, or something...
280:
973:
About half of the images on this page have descriptions which include a legend showing which party is represented by each colour. For instance,
1132:
498:
942:
753:
Well, though it's painstaking, may have to check list of All
Canadian Senators tenures; and add them accordingly to each #Canadian Parliment.
1142:
1117:
488:
1016:
623:
633:
And could you increase the width of the "Parliament and election" columns so that elections and sessions fill only two lines? Thank you.
1147:
1122:
371:
925:
862:
843:
899:"Brian Mulroney used a never-before used clause in the Constitution" <-- could this mention which clause is the one in question?
246:
1057:
464:
1137:
586:
because there are discrepancies between the information in it and the information given on one of its references, specifically
362:
323:
769:
738:
1033:
237:
192:
167:
784:
Well, if not the actual
Senators then at least the political party composition of the Senate during those Parliaments.
587:
460:
456:
451:
428:
40:
627:
873:
604:
This should be a featured list now. How does it get one of those little stars at the top right of the page? --
731:
30:
1019:
1069:
876:. Seems like the anon user is a European unfamiliar with the majority-government worshiping nature of FPTP...
155:
20:
1037:
921:
858:
839:
699:
671:
634:
57:
1065:
812:
I've added some seat counts in the Senate, though I need to find a new source for older
Parliaments. --
173:
44:
1028:
1007:
995:
992:
835:
831:
1073:
963:
930:
909:
886:
867:
816:
805:
788:
779:
757:
748:
720:
702:
693:
684:
674:
649:
637:
608:
594:
572:
556:
546:
532:
590:. Some work needs to be done to clarify any conflicts that exist between this list and its source.
529:
370:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
245:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
959:
1017:
https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Parliament_Of_Canada_Seating_Plan_2015_(With_Speaker_Included).svg
916:
906:
883:
853:
813:
802:
776:
745:
717:
690:
681:
646:
605:
569:
553:
543:
48:
591:
974:
1022:
354:
1041:
525:
348:
338:
317:
1081:
955:
583:
229:
901:
878:
785:
766:
754:
735:
289:
1052:
344:
219:
213:
186:
797:
Because this topic is about several articles, I'm moving the conversation to
1013:
1010:
443:
422:
1020:
https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Canadian_House_of_Commons_2019_standard.svg
367:
630:, since there's no mention of the "federal parliament" term in the page?
618:
I'm new to this subject but I have two comments about this great list.
943:
Leaders of the Official Opposition in the House of Commons Since 1873
799:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Government of Canada/Parliaments of Canada
242:
1029:
https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Canada_2006_Federal_Election_seats.svg
1008:
https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Canada_2006_Federal_Election_seats.svg
1004:
996:
https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Canada_1993_Federal_Election_seats.svg
993:
https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Canada_1988_Federal_Election_seats.svg
1001:
998:
989:
986:
983:
980:
716:
and anyone interested can just go look at the list of speakers. --
149:
1047:...but that "Canadian Parliament Legend" page doesn't exist.
744:
How do think the senate should be worked into the table? --
288:
979:
However, the following images don't include such a legend:
975:
https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Chambre_des_Communes_1867.png
552:
I'm making a chart. If it looks really dumb I'll revert.
1023:
https://en.wikipedia.org/File:44th_Canadian_Parliament.svg
463:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
969:
Missing image descriptions with legends for seat colours
945:
at the Library of Parliament site, there is a footnote:
1093:
Featured lists that have appeared on the main page once
954:
Should this be reflected in the Knowledge article? --
366:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
241:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1088:Featured lists that have appeared on the main page
63:This article appeared on Knowledge's Main Page as
1014:https://en.wikipedia.org/File:41st_Can_House.svg
1011:https://en.wikipedia.org/File:40th_Can_House.svg
1113:Top-importance Governments of Canada articles
8:
872:Yeah, I just answered the same question at
455:, an attempt to structure and organize all
1005:https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Elec2004.PNG
417:
312:
181:
72:
15:
1002:https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Cdn2000.PNG
999:https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Cdn1997.PNG
990:https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Cdn1984.PNG
987:https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Cdn1980.PNG
984:https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Cdn1911.PNG
981:https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Cdn1908.PNG
459:. If you wish to help, please visit the
1108:FL-Class Governments of Canada articles
419:
314:
183:
1103:Top-importance Canada-related articles
588:the list of Leaders of the Opposition
153:
7:
725:
624:List of Canadian federal parliaments
449:This article is within the scope of
360:This article is within the scope of
235:This article is within the scope of
27:List of Canadian federal parliaments
823:What parties make up the coalition?
172:It is of interest to the following
47:. If you can update or improve it,
14:
563:Conservative/Liberal-Conservative
300:WikiProject Governments of Canada
1128:Mid-importance politics articles
1098:FL-Class Canada-related articles
941:I noticed that, in the appendix
442:
421:
347:
337:
316:
222:
212:
185:
154:
56:
19:
1027:The description for one image (
493:This article has been rated as
400:This article has been rated as
275:This article has been rated as
703:09:45, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
698:Sorry for the late Thank you.
380:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
1:
1133:WikiProject Politics articles
846:) 08:59, April 6, 2007 (UTC).
694:23:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
685:22:47, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
675:20:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
650:19:11, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
638:09:20, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
582:This list wasn't featured on
533:12:59, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
383:Template:WikiProject Politics
374:and see a list of open tasks.
297:This article is supported by
249:and see a list of open tasks.
1143:Low-importance List articles
1118:All WikiProject Canada pages
817:07:33, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
806:01:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
789:01:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
780:22:56, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
770:22:52, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
758:22:44, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
749:22:35, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
739:20:36, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
726:Where's the Canadian Senate?
721:17:57, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
628:List of Canadian parliaments
255:Knowledge:WikiProject Canada
734:Talk page, for discussion.
609:22:43, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
473:Knowledge:WikiProject Lists
258:Template:WikiProject Canada
1164:
1148:WikiProject Lists articles
1123:FL-Class politics articles
1074:00:53, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
1034:Canadian Parliament legend
578:Discrepancies with sources
573:01:31, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
557:00:10, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
547:00:48, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
499:project's importance scale
476:Template:WikiProject Lists
406:project's importance scale
281:project's importance scale
33:, which means it has been
964:14:33, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
937:Leaders of the Opposition
874:Talk:Parliament of Canada
868:14:29, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
492:
437:
399:
332:
296:
274:
207:
180:
140:
75:
71:
1051:This is a file from the
931:15:04, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
910:14:15, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
887:14:11, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
732:39th Canadian Parliament
595:18:52, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
1055:. Information from its
660:1st Canadian Parliament
622:Why is the list's name
524:got consensus to keep.
457:list pages on Knowledge
261:Canada-related articles
127:Featured list candidate
112:Featured list candidate
1138:FL-Class List articles
1058:description page there
952:
293:
162:This article is rated
947:
834:comment was added by
292:
97:Articles for deletion
65:Today's featured list
645:Parliament name. --
363:WikiProject Politics
67:on October 31, 2011.
45:Knowledge community
39:as one of the best
294:
238:WikiProject Canada
168:content assessment
76:Article milestones
1053:Wikimedia Commons
929:
866:
847:
513:
512:
509:
508:
505:
504:
452:WikiProject Lists
416:
415:
412:
411:
386:politics articles
311:
310:
307:
306:
148:
147:
136:
135:
92:November 30, 2005
1155:
1061:is shown below.
919:
856:
829:
481:
480:
477:
474:
471:
446:
439:
438:
433:
425:
418:
388:
387:
384:
381:
378:
357:
352:
351:
341:
334:
333:
328:
320:
313:
263:
262:
259:
256:
253:
232:
227:
226:
225:
216:
209:
208:
203:
200:
189:
182:
165:
159:
158:
150:
141:Current status:
73:
60:
43:produced by the
23:
16:
1163:
1162:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1078:
1077:
971:
939:
897:
830:—The preceding
825:
728:
713:
616:
602:
580:
565:
540:
520:This article's
518:
478:
475:
472:
469:
468:
431:
385:
382:
379:
376:
375:
355:Politics portal
353:
346:
326:
260:
257:
254:
251:
250:
228:
223:
221:
201:
195:
166:on Knowledge's
163:
12:
11:
5:
1161:
1159:
1151:
1150:
1145:
1140:
1135:
1130:
1125:
1120:
1115:
1110:
1105:
1100:
1095:
1090:
1080:
1079:
970:
967:
938:
935:
934:
933:
896:
893:
892:
891:
890:
889:
824:
821:
820:
819:
809:
808:
794:
793:
792:
791:
763:
762:
761:
760:
727:
724:
712:
709:
708:
707:
706:
705:
687:
667:
665:
663:
661:
658:
657:
656:
655:
641:
640:
631:
615:
612:
601:
598:
579:
576:
564:
561:
560:
559:
539:
536:
517:
514:
511:
510:
507:
506:
503:
502:
495:Low-importance
491:
485:
484:
482:
447:
435:
434:
432:Low‑importance
426:
414:
413:
410:
409:
402:Mid-importance
398:
392:
391:
389:
372:the discussion
359:
358:
342:
330:
329:
327:Mid‑importance
321:
309:
308:
305:
304:
295:
285:
284:
277:Top-importance
273:
267:
266:
264:
247:the discussion
234:
233:
217:
205:
204:
202:Top‑importance
190:
178:
177:
171:
160:
146:
145:
138:
137:
134:
133:
130:
123:
122:August 4, 2006
119:
118:
115:
108:
104:
103:
100:
93:
89:
88:
85:
82:
78:
77:
69:
68:
61:
53:
52:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1160:
1149:
1146:
1144:
1141:
1139:
1136:
1134:
1131:
1129:
1126:
1124:
1121:
1119:
1116:
1114:
1111:
1109:
1106:
1104:
1101:
1099:
1096:
1094:
1091:
1089:
1086:
1085:
1083:
1076:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1066:Bayersglassey
1062:
1060:
1059:
1054:
1048:
1045:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1031:) says: : -->
1030:
1025:
1024:
1021:
1018:
1015:
1012:
1009:
1006:
1003:
1000:
997:
994:
991:
988:
985:
982:
977:
976:
968:
966:
965:
961:
957:
951:
946:
944:
936:
932:
927:
923:
918:
914:
913:
912:
911:
908:
904:
903:
894:
888:
885:
881:
880:
875:
871:
870:
869:
864:
860:
855:
850:
849:
848:
845:
841:
837:
833:
822:
818:
815:
811:
810:
807:
804:
800:
796:
795:
790:
787:
783:
782:
781:
778:
774:
773:
772:
771:
768:
759:
756:
752:
751:
750:
747:
743:
742:
741:
740:
737:
733:
723:
722:
719:
710:
704:
701:
697:
696:
695:
692:
688:
686:
683:
679:
678:
677:
676:
673:
669:
653:
652:
651:
648:
643:
642:
639:
636:
632:
629:
625:
621:
620:
619:
613:
611:
610:
607:
600:Featured List
599:
597:
596:
593:
589:
585:
577:
575:
574:
571:
570:-arctic gnome
562:
558:
555:
554:-arctic gnome
551:
550:
549:
548:
545:
537:
535:
534:
531:
527:
523:
515:
500:
496:
490:
487:
486:
483:
479:List articles
466:
462:
458:
454:
453:
448:
445:
441:
440:
436:
430:
427:
424:
420:
407:
403:
397:
394:
393:
390:
373:
369:
365:
364:
356:
350:
345:
343:
340:
336:
335:
331:
325:
322:
319:
315:
302:
301:
291:
287:
286:
282:
278:
272:
269:
268:
265:
248:
244:
240:
239:
231:
230:Canada portal
220:
218:
215:
211:
210:
206:
199:
194:
191:
188:
184:
179:
175:
169:
161:
157:
152:
151:
144:
143:Featured list
139:
131:
129:
128:
124:
121:
120:
116:
114:
113:
109:
106:
105:
101:
99:
98:
94:
91:
90:
86:
83:
80:
79:
74:
70:
66:
62:
59:
55:
54:
50:
46:
42:
38:
37:
32:
31:featured list
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1063:
1056:
1049:
1046:
1042:André Arthur
1026:
978:
972:
953:
948:
940:
917:Arctic Gnome
900:
898:
877:
854:Arctic Gnome
836:71.131.1.131
826:
814:Arctic Gnome
803:Arctic Gnome
777:Arctic Gnome
764:
746:Arctic Gnome
729:
718:Arctic Gnome
714:
691:Arctic Gnome
682:Arctic Gnome
670:
659:
647:Arctic Gnome
617:
606:Arctic Gnome
603:
581:
566:
544:arctic gnome
541:
519:
494:
461:project page
450:
401:
361:
298:
276:
236:
174:WikiProjects
142:
125:
117:Not promoted
110:
107:May 24, 2006
95:
49:please do so
34:
26:
1038:independent
895:Footnote 18
592:TheGrappler
198:Governments
1082:Categories
711:new column
662:— elected
522:AFD debate
516:Failed AFD
465:discussion
36:identified
915:Done. --
668:sessions
526:Johnleemk
956:Big_iron
926:contribs
863:contribs
844:contribs
832:unsigned
730:See the
626:and not
614:Comments
377:Politics
368:politics
324:Politics
164:FL-class
132:Promoted
902:Padraic
879:Padraic
786:GoodDay
767:GoodDay
755:GoodDay
736:GoodDay
497:on the
404:on the
279:on the
84:Process
1036:. The
584:WP:FLC
252:Canada
243:Canada
193:Canada
170:scale.
87:Result
666:— (5
538:messy
470:Lists
429:Lists
41:lists
29:is a
1070:talk
1032:See
960:talk
950:....
922:talk
907:talk
884:talk
859:talk
840:talk
801:. --
664:1867
530:Talk
102:Kept
81:Date
1040:is
489:Low
396:Mid
271:Top
1084::
1072:)
1044:.
962:)
924:•
905:·
882:·
861:•
842:•
700:CG
672:CG
635:CG
528:|
196::
1068:(
958:(
928:)
920:(
865:)
857:(
838:(
501:.
467:.
408:.
303:.
283:.
176::
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
