31:
1813:
serial grouped under its own production code, so saying that they were part of the same story was simple enough. Here, production codes don't help us because different production blocks are scattered over different episodes, so we have to fall back on the intent of the production office. There was a very brief discussion on the
1690:
The numbering scheme is, ultimately, arbitrary, since originally all we ever had to go on was production codes. The scheme here follows the scheme started in reference works like the
Discontunity Guide and the numbering in the R1 DVD releases and is not to be taken as an "official" number, but merely
399:
Saying where a story is in a season isn't a problem - my problem is with attempts to number all the stories from the start which have appeared in some lists elsewhere. This breaks down because of arguments over "is the Trial 1 or 4 stories" (and the BBC took different views on different ocassions!),
1828:
If you're going by the BBC's organization, then why are you numbering the new-series episodes using the original-series scheme? Seems a bit odd, going halfway. One would think you'd either treat the new series entirely as its own unit, and number accordingly, or follow the old standard and group by
1812:
This is a slightly contentious issue. Originally, we had the stories arranged as you mention. However, it appears that the BBC are treating them as separate episodes (the episode guides on the BBC website on
Outpost Gallifrey reflects this). In the Hartnell stories we had the benefit of having each
543:
Hmm, they've changed it since I last looked. To be honest the whole season went out with one story title and was clearly intended to be one story, regardless of how the internal production was structured. The confusion arises because "The
Ultimate Foe" was in fact a working title for the third bit,
1316:
Yeah, that probably would work better. That was my original idea, as well, but I thought that it might make more sense show the crew in context of the shows themselves, to give a better idea of their tenure (esp. during periods of high turnover, as in seasons five and six). But it makes the list a
1307:
The writers after the serials are okay - the producers and story editors bits look awkward. In the individual synopses (at least those in the format I've been pushing) I've included links to cast and crew lists, and those should be sufficient. What I was thinking was a separate article showing the
1284:
I think they're important since some people might be searching for the episode name rather than the serial name. As to the formatting, I admit there could be a better way of doing it. I tried numbered lists, but that just took up way too much space. I tried tables so that the episode number and
1168:
Right now, there's only one entry written with a "from" in the title ("Spearhead From Space"), and that has it capitalized. Since there are two other entries to be created, "Creature from the Pit" and "Fury from the Deep", with the same word in them should they be capitalized too or shall we move
1673:
As the new Doctor Who is considered a new production by the BBC, shouldn't epsiode numbering start at 1? It might be a good idea to split off the new Doctor Who into "List of (new) Doctor Who episodes" article, as they are not multi-episode serial stories, but single episode stories.
1207:
You just need to use the "move" link at the top of the From page. All the article history is preserved. You can't normally overwrite existing pages in this way, but as it's overwriting a redirect in this case this is OK. Actually you don't need to do this, as I've just done it. --
1807:
What I'm wondering is why, in the case of multi-part stories, each episode is listed as its own "serial" in the guide. Surely it is both fair and sensible to list "Aliens of London" and "World War Three" as a single story, especially given the way the early
Hartnell era operated.
1264:, among others). One of the things I've added to all the synopses is an external link to the cast and crew lists on the bbc.co.uk website. They've changed the .html files to .shtml files, so the links are all broken. Please change the links accordingly if you come across them. -
287:
Other big thing - the correct term is story or serial, not episode. The series number is not something to put in as there is no official designation for any of them and some of the later ones generate a lot of controversy as it's not clear what should and shouldn't be counted.
309:
You're right, of course. I use the term serial consistently in my entries (see my proposed format), but there's always the occasional slip. Can we then settle on whether or not to include cast list and then start doing the individual serial entries to the proposed format?
140:
People I know use the word "series" to mean "programme/show", especialy when there is more than one related programme, like the five Star Trek series. A "story arc" is a chain of episodes longer than a two-parter, so it can be used to discribe the original Doctor Who.
1099:
On a more positive note, I like the
Peerbox template - that should replace the tables we've been using for the synopses. I'm quite happy with for format I've been using, but of course that's bias for my own work... does anybody else have any thoughts on the cast box in
1564:
being listed as No. 152, it seems that they're treating Trial as 4 serials instead of 1, and Shada is in there as well. The reason I put them up there is because of the lack of production codes on the new series - Series 1, Episode 1, etc. are going to be confusing.
495:
as the page title for the Dalek story (though there should be an acknowledgement on there that that is the original title and the reason why it isn't used) but
Knowledge does encourage consistency and standardised formates on large series of related article titles.
269:
I don't think a cast list or series number is necessary, myself (perhaps if we included the official serial designation, like AA, or 7B). It doesn't look right on the page somehow. I would be more interested in the plot or the significance of the episode if
1727:
has confirmed that the title of the previously untitled episode 12 is "Bad Wolf" (which was my first guess, anyway). Their source for this information is Doctor Who
Magazine, so I assume it to be official. I'll go ahead and make that minor change... :) --
832:
Looks good. Can I suggest including the directors (Warris
Hussein and someone else for one episode IIRC). Also the code is just "D", not "1D" - the numbers don't come in until the fourth cycle (until then it's A,B etc..., then AA, BB... then AAA, BBB...).
1735:
While the information seems reliable, I wonder if it might be worthwhile to specify that it's as-yet-uncomfirmed-by-the-BBC, just to cover our... well, y'know. OTOH, it's my personal inclination to trust OG over and above the BBC, so, whatever.... –
1047:
OK, how about this. I've right-aligned it as it would be on the page. Is everybody happy with wikilinking all companions, writers, directors and producers? My feeling is that where these articles don't already exist, we should have them eventually.
852:
Agree, looks good to me. Hope you don't mind but I've corrected your HTML (you used an open td tag instead of a close td tag on the last two rows, which added an unwanted third column). Maybe add the producer too? They do set the "tone" of an era.
1574:
I think that having a number to the left of each episode title is helpful even if the numbers themselves are more or less meaningless. People like to have things numbered. We may wish to add a note about how the numbering is arbitrary.
92:
I think we should title the first
Eccleston series '2005 Season', as that seems to be the least controversial title(without specifying whether it is to be considered a continuation of the previous series or a new series entirely).
1549:
and the only time the BBC ever said anything on this provides a different answer to what we have here. Would it not be better to follow the usage of most programme guides and use the production codes which are pretty unambiguous?
1169:"Spearhead From Space" to its non-capitalized version? My view is that we should do the latter, since "of the" is lower-case throughout the serial listing. A disambig page for "Spearhead" exists, but it should be the main page. --
366:. Also, I think we need to say, "XXX is the Yth serial in the Zth season", rather than just using a production code which wouldn't necessarily mean anything to a non-Doctor Who fan (though why a non-fan would be looking up
1524:
Comments are welcome. If this is acceptable to people, let's start redoing the serial pages with the new box over the next week or so. I'm kind of under deadline doom for my thesis, so I would appreciate help on this.
1520:
to separate the lines. We should still leave the
External link to the Cast and Crew list as that carries a lot more detail. Guybrush suggested a Script Editor credit - where should it go in the hierarchy, though?
1061:
Sounds like a good idea to me. If we have to add any further to the box, I'd suggest the Script Editor (Story Editor for the first five seasons) as they had arguably more creative influence than the producer.
208:, originally aired in X parts from DATE to DATE. Anything especially significant about the episode (Anniversary, etc.) can be put here. If it is an early Hartnell serial, episode titles should be listed:
252:
I absolutely agree that we need a consistent standard, and that seems pretty good. Is it worth putting in a (main) cast list? I've been doing that with the episodes that I've put in (see, for example,
79:
71:
66:
554:
Regarding that pesky Season 23; Knowledge has articles for all of the individual serials, but not under the titles we currently use on this list. They are titled with the nomenclature used in the
1782:
were story arcs, or even the early Hartnell serials. I believe it's already noted in the "Notes" section of the stories, or should be if it isn't that each directly follows on from the other from
1223:"The BBC" is a very big sprawling organisation and one section's usage of a term does not make anything "official". Can I suggest we adopt the following order of priority in determining this:
1747:
I think we can leave it as it's from DWM. The only confusion earlier (from an SFX article) was whether the earlier episode was World War III or World War Three, and that was minor. --
256:). I've also put the series number in the intro, but I agree that transmission date is important too. I'd put anything more than that (anniversaries, etc) into the "notes" section.--
47:
17:
1619:
Excellent! I shall look forward to it ; when was that decision taken? Was it purely on the back of last Saturday's viewing figures - or was it taken some time before that?
1149:!). But IMHO it's better to let the box size itself, and use a design that doesn't produce over-long lines. I might try a few designs later in the week, if I have time. --
674:
Or even something more extensive - a sidebox with Doctor, season, companions, writer, alternate titles, etc. It might solve some of the issue we've discussed above. --
1829:
serial. Although it is true that neither scheme seems entirely adequate, it seems wise to just pick one rather than hedge your bets and not get either quite right.
1648:
Is this definitely true? Last I heard, it was a Sun front page. Might Eccleston be persuaded to stay on, or change his mind before the new season gets written?
114:
Dr. Who ran in stories consisting of several episodes. Each story was named not each episode. The stories were of widely differing lengths and number of episodes.
599:
I'd go with four separate stories, plus an entry for the Trial as a whole (that's how we've got it now), but making the "official" position clear in each story.--
97:
Actually, it should still be Series 1 because that's how the production team are referring to it. The 2005 is just to make it distinct from Season One, et al. --
1694:
In terms of "official" placing, we're already designating it as Series 1, Episode 1 in the production code section of the box, like the production company does.
335:
I see no problem with cast lists. I would also use the production codes - these are mainly unambiguous and are generally used by reference works and the like.
362:
What about writer/director? Writers seem quite important, which is why I've included them in the ones I've done, but I do appreciate that Knowledge isn't the
370:, for example, I'm not too sure!) Oh, and can we make sure that alternative titles, where they are not ambiguous, are redirected to whatever title we use. --
1051:
Incidentally, does anyone feel that we should have an official Doctor Who wikiproject? There are sure to be other issues like this that need resolution. --
919:
737:
584:
Can I suggest we decide first of all if the Trial should be presented as one story or four (I'm with the former as that is how it is billed on screen) and
1111:
I think it's too wide: but that's a result of the first line, which is unusually long. We can always improve the design but the content looks good. --
477:
needs to be disamb'd. IMO, we should only tag it with (Doctor Who Serial) where it is necessary. To put the suffix on every serial seems a big clumsy.
1633:
Had this been announced a day later, I would have put it down to an April Fool's Day joke - sad news however ; quite a shock to wake up to that... -
511:
I'd say there's no need for suffixes except where necessary to disambiguate - there's going to be no more than half a dozen or so like that. --
684:
A more extensive sidebox would work better in my opinion. Take a look at the ones used for UK Prime Ministers, to pick a random example, e.g.
1818:
1276:
Do we really want to add this to the listing? So far, they've been included in the actual synopses. Also, the tables look really awkward. --
123:
As near as I can figure, the terms "show, series, & serial" in the UK translate as "series, season, & story arc" in that order.
574:. I'm not sure whether The Ultimate Foe should be a description of the third story, the fourth story, or a disambiguation page... --
1066:
1055:
837:
705:
692:
678:
625:
603:
592:
578:
548:
515:
408:
374:
339:
314:
292:
274:
260:
1814:
1707:
232:
Anything else significant about the episode that doesn't warrant an entry in the first section. For examples of this format, see
1687:
The new series is a continuation of the old - it is not a reboot, but is clearly intended to follow on from the old continuity.
1701:
was a series of serials - who's to say it won't go back to that? And to have two lists would be more confusing than one.
1090:
To be frank? It's ugly. Is there any information there that the link to the BBC website at the bottom wouldn't provide? -
1334:
to replace the box at the bottom of the serial synopses. Have a look at the code for the box below to see how it works.
544:
and only applied to the fourth by people outside the production office, presumably the publishers of the novelisation.
1073:
438:
1583:
656:
199:
38:
1537:
Are these really needed? There is no actual consensus on the correct numbers for the series, not least because of
1560:
860:
Agreed about adding the producer - what about noting archive status - whether the story still exists or not etc.
240:
1601:
Has this been confirmed yet? Or is it still hypothetical? If the latter, should it really be included here? -
1545:
555:
1357:
1292:
I couldn't find a good way of formatting the text, so I just added links to individual episode title pages.
1027:
807:
253:
1778:
1634:
1620:
1602:
1146:
1101:
1079:
861:
567:
536:
159:
We're talking about the (admittedly confusing) traditional UK useage, though. --22:47, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
1551:
1497:
1331:
1244:
1178:
1083:
1063:
834:
689:
589:
559:
545:
497:
469:
because that would confuse it with the Pertwee serial of the same name) - the alternative is to call it
458:
442:
405:
336:
289:
177:
Not true. The episodes may have been individually titled, but each serial was made as a single entity. —
1675:
1519:
It's all very simple - basically, all you need to do is just fill in the fields, and put a <br: -->
1790:
1260:
637:
367:
234:
1762:
Story arc? Or just stories that apparently take place one after another. Compare Yeti/Ice Warriors.
1724:
1710:, please consider creating an account, go to the project page and continue to discuss this there. --
1658:
1626:
Apparently on the strength of the viewing figures. But now Eccleston has announced he's leaving. --
1411:
1192:
So how do we get someone to swap the current "Spearhead From Space" with "Spearhead from Space"? --
1039:
819:
1832:
The lame answer is that that's how Outpost Gallifrey is doing it in its episode guide, really. --
1763:
1660:
Still, I guess Eccleston always was a bit busy to commit to Dr Who for 7 years like Tom Baker...
1539:
1308:
chronological tenure of producers, story editors, because they are more constant than writers. --
401:
134:
172:
Note that for the early Hartnell years there was not yet a concept of a multi-episode 'serial'.
1610:
1427:
189:
Is there a common format for episode synopses or can we settle on one? I propose the following
1772:
1507:
649:
142:
124:
1784:
1661:
1649:
911:
729:
571:
1833:
1822:
1795:
1748:
1711:
1627:
1613:
1587:
1576:
1566:
1526:
1309:
1293:
1286:
1277:
1265:
1193:
1170:
1127:
1091:
685:
478:
311:
271:
245:
98:
1126:
Is there a way to make the box a standard width no matter how long the lines in it are? -
1737:
1475:
1393:
1318:
1317:
little cluttered, and probably doesn't help as much as I thought it might. Ah, well. –
1209:
1182:
1150:
1112:
1052:
973:
957:
945:
933:
929:
882:
854:
795:
751:
747:
702:
675:
665:
600:
512:
371:
257:
196:
1729:
1723:
While it is not yet on the official BBC website, in their episode guide, the website
961:
925:
743:
434:
115:
1235:
2). The standard rules of capitalisation - only the nouns get capitalised and so on.
1421:
1383:
107:
881:
Oh, and number of episodes in the serial, plus episode length - eg 4x25 minutes --
531:
The Official Site's episode guide calls its entry for the last part of Season 23
1364:
1005:
773:
622:
575:
363:
178:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1285:
the episode title wouldn't become separated. "& nbsp;" might work better.
430:
204:
1258:
I've been trying to push a standardized format for the episode synopses (see
429:
Some of the links would be more appropriate for articles on concepts (e.g.
894:
563:
1012:
780:
1467:
1458:
636:
Would it be helpful to have something like this as a footer (using
1691:
the place the story stands in the larger context of the programme.
454:
450:
1471:
1462:
1015:
1008:
783:
776:
527:
The Trial of a Time Lord - One story or four? Individual titles?
1072:
Also, to get a link to the Barbara Wright page you have to use
1431:
1181:
uses "from" rather than "From" so I guess that's official. --
425:
Need for an agreed format for the individual serial page names
25:
1558:
The story numbers are on the BBC Region 1 releases, and with
1232:
1). The onscreen captions - some are not fully capitalised.
1078:
It's been a while but there's now an example of the box at
712:
437:. How about we retitle all the pages to something like
1145:
You can specify widths (as I see you've discovered in
465:
is still the most common title (we don't want to use
133:
Not so. Show = programme, serial = in several parts.
106:
What's a serial? Isn't this just a list of episodes?
1839:
Well, now OG has changed format just as arbitrarily.
588:
decide on individual titles, if any are to be used.
1482:
1454:
1446:
1438:
1417:
1407:
1399:
1389:
1379:
1374:
1349:
1342:
18:Talk:List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–present)
441:to provide a consistency and avoid confusion?
1697:Things change. For the majority of its life,
8:
433:), whilst others lead to non-Who stuff like
185:Need for a common format for serial synopses
1657:Bugger! Just read it on the bbc website.
1339:
642:
661:
654:
645:
223:SYNOPSIS (as subsection) {msg: Spoiler}
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
1706:If you would like to participate in
1682:Not really, for a number of reasons.
24:
763:1D (fourth serial, first season)
1708:Knowledge:Wikiproject Doctor Who
226:Full summary, including ending.
29:
995:Seven episodes, each 25 minutes
1770:Not a story arc any more than
985:D (season one, fourth serial)
701:OK, here's a first attempt. --
439:The Daleks (Doctor Who serial)
1:
1669:New Production vs continuity
1719:untitled episode "Bad Wolf"
1104:? -04:32, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1074:Barbara Wright (Doctor Who)
1860:
1836:12:00, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
1825:20:01, May 11, 2005 (UTC)
1609:Yes, it's been confirmed.
1584:List of Doctor Who serials
857:22:05, May 14, 2004 (UTC)
657:List of Doctor Who Serials
539:04:08, May 13, 2004 (UTC)
535:so why doesn't Knowledge?
491:I wouldn't advocate using
449:We already have pages for
200:science fiction television
1798:15:24, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)
1766:14:30, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1740:15:47, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC)
1678:09:58, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1664:10:52, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
1652:10:49, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
1630:23:40, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
1623:23:11, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
1616:22:55, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
1605:22:53, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
1579:21:00, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1561:Remembrance of the Daleks
1554:09:53, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
1529:04:56, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
1487:
1354:
1344:Doctor Who (Enemy Within)
1268:09:56, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1173:02:24, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC)
1086:18:30, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
885:14:46, May 15, 2004 (UTC)
864:14:08, May 15, 2004 (UTC)
445:03:28, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)
248:20:00, 24 Apr 2004 (UTC)
241:Remembrance of the Daleks
181:01:39, 15 Sep 2003 (UTC)
137:06:39, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
118:16:29, Sep 13, 2003 (UTC)
110:14:15, 13 Sep 2003 (UTC)
1758:Tom Baker opening season
1751:15:54, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1714:13:13, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1637:05:14, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
1590:21:27, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1569:15:05, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
1546:The Trial of a Time Lord
1321:12:04, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
1312:05:58, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
1289:04:56, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
1280:00:04, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
1247:11:18, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
1212:08:00, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
1196:14:54, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC)
1185:08:49, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC)
1179:BBC page on this episode
1153:22:07, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1130:10:41, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1115:09:11, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1094:18:57, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1067:11:06, 17 May 2004 (UTC)
1056:10:41, 17 May 2004 (UTC)
838:14:18, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
706:12:01, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
693:10:19, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
679:10:15, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
626:21:10, 19 May 2004 (UTC)
604:10:07, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
593:23:08, 13 May 2004 (UTC)
579:16:23, 13 May 2004 (UTC)
556:The Trial of a Time Lord
549:07:55, 13 May 2004 (UTC)
516:08:47, 13 May 2004 (UTC)
500:10:21, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)
481:06:03, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)
409:10:17, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
375:10:07, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
340:09:39, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
315:08:48, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
293:08:03, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
275:03:21, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
261:08:47, 13 May 2004 (UTC)
101:17:49, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)
1337:1996 Doctor Who episode
1296:09:01, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
1028:The Edge of Destruction
808:The Edge of Destruction
621:to a disambiguation --
609:I went ahead and moved
473:. I agree, though that
1815:WikiProject Doctor Who
1779:The Evil of the Daleks
1147:Mission to the Unknown
1102:Mission to the Unknown
1080:Mission to the Unknown
640:as a random example):
568:Terror of the Vervoids
229:NOTES (as subsection)
1418:Executive producer(s)
1332:Template:Doctorwhobox
1326:Template:Doctorwhobox
560:The Mysterious Planet
459:Silurian (Doctor Who)
42:of past discussions.
1803:New Series "Serials"
1791:Terror of the Zygons
1261:Tomb of the Cybermen
638:The Curse of Peladon
368:The Mark of the Rani
235:Spearhead From Space
1254:Cast and crew lists
1040:The Keys of Marinus
901:
820:The Keys of Marinus
719:
195:is a serial in the
1422:Philip David Segal
1001:Transmission dates
910:The First Doctor:
895:
769:Transmission dates
728:The First Doctor:
713:
632:Footer box/sidebox
1773:The Faceless Ones
1725:Outpost Gallifrey
1635:Zaphod Beeblebrox
1621:Zaphod Beeblebrox
1603:Zaphod Beeblebrox
1517:
1516:
1513:
1512:
1045:
1044:
825:
824:
672:
671:
650:Day of the Daleks
615:Time Incorporated
88:Series vs. Season
85:
84:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1851:
1785:The Ark in Space
1552:Timrollpickering
1489:
1488:
1340:
1245:Timrollpickering
1084:Timrollpickering
1064:Timrollpickering
912:William Hartnell
902:
900:
835:Timrollpickering
730:William Hartnell
720:
718:
690:Timrollpickering
643:
611:The Ultimate Foe
590:Timrollpickering
572:The Ultimate Foe
546:Timrollpickering
533:The Ultimate Foe
498:Timrollpickering
443:Timrollpickering
406:Timrollpickering
337:Timrollpickering
290:Timrollpickering
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1859:
1858:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1805:
1760:
1721:
1671:
1599:
1597:Series 2 (2006)
1535:
1455:First broadcast
1439:Production code
1370:
1369:
1338:
1328:
1305:
1303:Production team
1274:
1256:
1166:
1082:. Take a look.
981:Production code
896:
759:Production code
714:
686:Stanley Baldwin
634:
529:
471:The Dead Planet
427:
187:
90:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1857:
1855:
1847:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1804:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1759:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1742:
1741:
1720:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1703:
1702:
1695:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1683:
1670:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1654:
1653:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1598:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1571:
1570:
1534:
1531:
1515:
1514:
1511:
1510:
1506:
1500:
1496:
1485:
1484:
1480:
1479:
1466:
1465:(first global)
1456:
1452:
1451:
1448:
1444:
1443:
1440:
1436:
1435:
1426:
1424:
1419:
1415:
1414:
1409:
1405:
1404:
1401:
1397:
1396:
1394:Matthew Jacobs
1391:
1387:
1386:
1381:
1377:
1376:
1372:
1371:
1368:
1367:
1361:
1355:
1352:
1351:
1347:
1346:
1336:
1327:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1304:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1273:
1272:Episode titles
1270:
1255:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1233:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1187:
1186:
1165:
1164:From vs. from?
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1106:
1105:
1096:
1095:
1070:
1069:
1043:
1042:
1037:
1031:
1030:
1025:
1019:
1018:
1003:
997:
996:
993:
987:
986:
983:
977:
976:
974:Verity Lambert
971:
965:
964:
958:Warris Hussein
955:
949:
948:
946:John Lucarotti
943:
937:
936:
934:Ian Chesterton
932:
930:Barbara Wright
928:
923:
915:
914:
908:
893:
892:
891:
890:
889:
888:
887:
886:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
823:
822:
817:
811:
810:
805:
799:
798:
796:John Lucarotti
793:
787:
786:
771:
765:
764:
761:
755:
754:
752:Ian Chesterton
750:
748:Barbara Wright
746:
741:
733:
732:
726:
711:
710:
709:
708:
696:
695:
670:
669:
666:The Sea Devils
663:
660:
653:
647:
633:
630:
629:
617:, and changed
607:
606:
596:
595:
552:
551:
528:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
504:
503:
502:
501:
485:
483:
482:
426:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
280:
279:
278:
277:
264:
263:
221:
220:
219:
218:
215:
186:
183:
175:
174:
168:
167:
166:
165:
164:
163:
162:
161:
160:
150:
149:
148:
147:
146:
145:
128:
127:
120:
119:
104:
103:
102:
89:
86:
83:
82:
77:
74:
69:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1856:
1838:
1837:
1835:
1831:
1830:
1827:
1826:
1824:
1820:
1816:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1802:
1797:
1793:
1792:
1787:
1786:
1781:
1780:
1775:
1774:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1765:
1764:GraemeLeggett
1757:
1750:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1739:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1726:
1718:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1704:
1700:
1696:
1693:
1689:
1686:
1685:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1677:
1668:
1663:
1659:
1656:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1646:
1636:
1632:
1631:
1629:
1625:
1624:
1622:
1618:
1617:
1615:
1611:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1604:
1596:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1580:
1578:
1573:
1572:
1568:
1563:
1562:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1553:
1548:
1547:
1542:
1541:
1533:Story numbers
1532:
1530:
1528:
1522:
1509:
1504:
1501:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1490:
1486:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1464:
1460:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1423:
1420:
1416:
1413:
1412:Peter V. Ware
1410:
1406:
1402:
1400:Script editor
1398:
1395:
1392:
1388:
1385:
1382:
1378:
1373:
1366:
1363:
1362:
1360:
1359:
1353:
1348:
1345:
1341:
1335:
1333:
1325:
1320:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1311:
1302:
1295:
1291:
1290:
1288:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1279:
1271:
1269:
1267:
1263:
1262:
1253:
1246:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1234:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1211:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1195:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1172:
1163:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1129:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1114:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1103:
1098:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1085:
1081:
1076:
1075:
1068:
1065:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1054:
1049:
1041:
1038:
1036:
1033:
1032:
1029:
1026:
1024:
1021:
1020:
1017:
1014:
1010:
1007:
1004:
1002:
999:
998:
994:
992:
989:
988:
984:
982:
979:
978:
975:
972:
970:
967:
966:
963:
962:John Crockett
959:
956:
954:
951:
950:
947:
944:
942:
939:
938:
935:
931:
927:
926:Susan Foreman
924:
922:
921:
917:
916:
913:
909:
907:
904:
903:
899:
884:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
863:
859:
858:
856:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
839:
836:
831:
830:
829:
828:
827:
826:
821:
818:
816:
813:
812:
809:
806:
804:
801:
800:
797:
794:
792:
789:
788:
785:
782:
778:
775:
772:
770:
767:
766:
762:
760:
757:
756:
753:
749:
745:
744:Susan Foreman
742:
740:
739:
735:
734:
731:
727:
725:
722:
721:
717:
707:
704:
700:
699:
698:
697:
694:
691:
687:
683:
682:
681:
680:
677:
668:
667:
659:
658:
652:
651:
644:
641:
639:
631:
628:
627:
624:
620:
616:
612:
605:
602:
598:
597:
594:
591:
587:
583:
582:
581:
580:
577:
573:
569:
565:
561:
558:article, ie:
557:
550:
547:
542:
541:
540:
538:
534:
526:
517:
514:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
499:
494:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
480:
476:
475:The Awakening
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
447:
446:
444:
440:
436:
435:The Awakening
432:
424:
410:
407:
404:count etc...
403:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
387:
376:
373:
369:
365:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
341:
338:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
316:
313:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
294:
291:
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
276:
273:
268:
267:
266:
265:
262:
259:
255:
251:
250:
249:
247:
243:
242:
237:
236:
230:
227:
224:
217:Title, (etc.)
216:
213:
212:
211:
210:
209:
207:
206:
201:
198:
194:
190:
184:
182:
180:
173:
170:
169:
158:
157:
156:
155:
154:
153:
152:
151:
144:
139:
138:
136:
135:GraemeLeggett
132:
131:
130:
129:
126:
122:
121:
117:
113:
112:
111:
109:
100:
96:
95:
94:
87:
81:
78:
75:
73:
70:
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1806:
1789:
1783:
1777:
1771:
1761:
1722:
1698:
1676:67.68.65.210
1672:
1600:
1559:
1544:
1538:
1536:
1523:
1518:
1502:
1493:
1447:Running time
1384:Geoffrey Sax
1356:
1343:
1329:
1306:
1275:
1259:
1257:
1167:
1077:
1071:
1050:
1046:
1034:
1022:
1000:
990:
980:
968:
952:
940:
918:
905:
897:
814:
802:
790:
768:
758:
736:
723:
715:
673:
664:
662:Followed by:
655:
648:
646:Preceded by:
635:
618:
614:
610:
608:
585:
553:
532:
530:
492:
484:
474:
470:
466:
462:
428:
239:
233:
231:
228:
225:
222:
203:
192:
191:
188:
176:
171:
143:Arctic.gnome
125:Arctic.gnome
105:
91:
60:
43:
37:
1662:PaulHammond
1650:PaulHammond
1503:Followed by
1494:Preceded by
1425:Alex Beaton
1408:Produced by
1380:Directed by
1365:Paul McGann
1035:Followed by
1023:Preceded by
1006:22 February
815:Followed by
803:Preceded by
774:22 February
493:The Mutants
467:The Mutants
461:and so on.
364:Radio Times
36:This is an
1834:khaosworks
1823:khaosworks
1796:khaosworks
1749:khaosworks
1712:khaosworks
1699:Doctor Who
1628:khaosworks
1614:khaosworks
1588:khaosworks
1577:Ravenswood
1567:khaosworks
1527:khaosworks
1483:Chronology
1390:Written by
1375:Production
1330:I created
1310:khaosworks
1294:DonQuixote
1287:DonQuixote
1278:khaosworks
1266:khaosworks
1194:khaosworks
1171:khaosworks
1128:khaosworks
1092:khaosworks
920:Companions
898:Marco Polo
738:Companions
716:Marco Polo
479:khaosworks
463:The Daleks
431:The Daleks
312:khaosworks
272:khaosworks
254:Marco Polo
246:khaosworks
205:Doctor Who
99:khaosworks
1738:Seancdaug
1582:Added to
1430:(for the
1428:Jo Wright
1319:Seancdaug
1210:Avaragado
1183:Avaragado
1151:Avaragado
1113:Avaragado
1053:ALargeElk
953:Directors
883:Avaragado
855:Avaragado
703:ALargeElk
676:ALargeElk
601:ALargeElk
513:ALargeElk
372:ALargeElk
258:ALargeElk
80:Archive 5
72:Archive 3
67:Archive 2
61:Archive 1
1730:travlr23
1498:Survival
969:Producer
564:Mindwarp
116:Rmhermen
1474:(first
1450:85 mins
1013:4 April
781:4 April
202:series
197:British
108:Evercat
39:archive
1468:May 27
1459:May 14
1358:Doctor
991:Length
960:&
941:Writer
906:Doctor
791:Writer
724:Doctor
623:Logotu
576:Logotu
270:any.--
179:Paul A
1817:page
1540:Shada
455:Auton
451:Dalek
402:Shada
400:does
214:Title
193:Title
16:<
1821:. --
1819:here
1794:. --
1776:and
1586:. --
1543:and
1508:Rose
1472:1996
1463:1996
1442:None
1403:None
1350:Cast
1177:The
1016:1964
1009:1964
784:1964
777:1964
586:then
570:and
244:. --
238:and
1788:to
1432:BBC
862:PMA
619:Foe
613:to
537:PMA
1612:--
1575:--
1565:--
1492:←
1476:UK
1470:,
1461:,
1011:-
853:--
779:-
688:.
566:,
562:,
457:,
453:,
310:--
76:→
1525:-
1505:→
1478:)
1434:)
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.