466:
895:, and so forth. In the time that I've been active on Knowledge (XXG), none of those have been proposed for deletion. It's also a list of Knowledge (XXG) articles, given that a large number of the entries on this list link to articles about individual extensions. I'd like to see a more substantive reason for deleting this article and not deleting the countless other articles that are comparable in function. Since the template suggests that deletion will automatically happen in five days, if I don't see a response to this question in a few days, I'll remove the template. -
263:
242:
273:
585:
525:
378:
498:
347:
196:
171:
446:
1381:
140:
85:
32:
1678:
There are thousands of addons for firefox available now, in all kinds of categories. some are largely used, others of small cult followings but have large revenue income. What determines if one addon should be on this list but not another? There is no way to catalog all the addons here, I continue to
1430:
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on
1021:
To be honest, I don't really get how some of these are open source while others aren't. The source is easy to get to from the .xpi (for any extension, unless it's a wrapper to some executable, I guess). Some of those listed in Other
Extensions are probably open source - like CuteMenus Crystal SVG and
1257:
To cleanup I suggest: 1)Keep only entries that have their own articles to make this a grouping of articles for organazation purposes, not a directory of software. If the article stands for itself then an entry here is justified 2)Remove most external links, as they, if any, should be in the article.
1704:
The eligibility requirements are laid out in the article source. An extension has to have its own dedicated article to be included here. Therefore, it must meet the notability requirements of an article. That keeps the thousands of addons from being listed here. I'm not sure why you would suggest
995:
h2g2bob, thanks for cleaning up the top list. I'm renaming it back to "Open source extensions" though. It seems to me that open source extensions tend to be more likely to be useful and notable than the rest, but if it is just called "Notable extensions" then it will start to pick up cruft again. I
1155:
the remainder that didn't immediately look notable to me. If I have trimmed a widely used extension that you think would be considered notable, consider creating an article about the extension (or website it integrates with) and be sure to have sources on the new article to demonstrate notability
1115:
Add-ons), Mozila uses "Add-ons" to refer to extensions and themes, not extensions and plug-ins. Plug-ins are a different animal, and work differently with the software. And if we renamed this article to "List of
Firefox add-ons," we'd also have to expand it to include a list of themes (and even
1640:
They are separated from normal third-party extensions because of the development force behind them. This lends to them a certain amount of notability. The "Official" are the ones created by
Mozilla themselves for their own browser. "Firefox Companions" are made by the same developers for other
1719:
I guess the reason behind the question is that this list looks really weird. On the
Firefox catalog one can see ratings and download rates immediately; here it is obviously a 1%-of-all list without a note why exactly these ones were listed. They are "notable" but... how about 100x more other
920:
among others. Now while
Martial arts are an encyclopedic topic, are all of these extensions really encyclopedic, or has this list just become a directory for anybody with an extension to add? Whether or not any of those other pages qualify, I don't know, but they might well not.
1655:
You shouldn't organize this list by notability, readers will most likely look for extensions by how they affect the browser. e.g. DOM Inspector belongs in development tools, eBay companion belongs in website integration, Google
Toolbar belongs in browser features.
1720:
extensions that are also notable? Are they less notable? Why? It's hard to imagine why someone would search for such an article in its current state. Perhaps it would make sense to create a category instead and mark all the qualifying articles with that category.
948:
We could look at how many times it has been downloaded at addons.mozilla.org (take the top however many from the list or set some minimum limit). There's not many that aren't listed on mozilla addons, but those that aren't there we can just guess or something.
907:
It's not automatic, not at all. Prod is a process where a deletion is proposed, without the full impact of an AfD. A testing of the waters to so speak. Since you bring it up though, there are a lot of List's proposed for deletion. Just recently,
799:?) -- a sort of "spamming" with knock-off spyware extensions (or of course the useless half-baked implementations that are a waste of time to install). For example, "toobar" this and "toolbar" that (commonly w/ the same version, 1.0.1.20).
690:
I do think this page has a use if it just listed
Opensource extensions. I am slowly trying to find this out so that I can hack them for Flock, but need a nice list to reference. Putting in a table with a License column would be very useful
1796:. As mentioned, I don't have the time to work on a large project like trying to make a featured list at the moment unfortunately. This also isn't a subject I'm familiar with anyway, so I don't think I'd be the best person to work on it.
1641:
sites. "Google" is a bit of a stretch, but it is the single site that has the most extensions written extensively just for it, so they are easier categorized by themselves instead of mixed in with the general population of extensions.
105:
1362:
shouldn't it be included as its the only firefox extension I know of that is is a email client its different from thunderbird because instead of being a full program its an extension its reletively new considering its only a month old
1212:
Since
Microsoft is writing FF extensions, NPOV suggests we need to welcome them to the fold them. But, of those three, the WMP plugin is the most important to include on this article; the others are not as they are still in beta atm.
1129:
in which both extensions and themes are managed, which are both referred to by their separate name. (And if you dig in the source code, something about plugins is in there too, but it doesn't seem to be for current/public versions.)
1896:
1742:
I added the most useful extensions to the list, including those without an article. Please don't remove these entries because someone will eventually create these articles. We need this because about 50 add-ons are now historical:
633:
Finally, is this page even necessary? There's a similar list at even if the descriptions there are a tad long-winded. Ideally addons.mozilla.org would be made into a wiki. The
Mozilla community is big into wikis anyway; they have
1348:... which redirects to this page. Is NoScript noteworthy enough to have it's own page? Failing that should we just remove the link, or have an external link to the noscript site itself? This circular linking stuff has to go. --
1480:
I agree. This article should include all extensions, or none at all. If this list only mentions "popular" extensions they should be backed up by some numbers. There seems to be no criteria on what can be included on this list at
864:
It might bring some consistency if one of these was always favoured. e.g. if an extension has a page on addons.mozilla.org that's the preferred link to list under 'More Info', or perhaps the homepage should always be favoured?
475:
361:
794:
Just noticed the existence of this page (via google). Normally I just search the mozilla addon site. However, lately, that site has been more difficult to use due to -- for lack of a better term (is there a term? maybe
1302:, removed the bit about Plugins, as that is discussed on the other Extension related article, added hyphens to all list items to provide uniformity and made some minor changes to language, citation style and dates.-
1043:
does not mean "anyone can see the source code if they want". It refers to a number of characteristics, all of which must be met for the software to be open source. See www.opensource.org for more info. Cheers,
47:
1891:
480:
1273:; I haven't touched "Extend Firefox Contest"; some good entries there need to be merged into the rest of the article, perhaps with a note that they won an award, then the section should be deleted.
1244:
119:
1208:
WMP, while a plugin, really should be mentioned on this page IMO, as the new plugin has been designed specifically for
Firefox 2 (Internet Explorer doesnt require the NN4 plugin infrastructure).
1427:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
846:
Few days ago, my seed of an article about DownThemAll! got deleted. I'd love to know why articles about other extensions are allowed and this one is not. No i'm not a DownThemAll! developer...
1876:
1886:
962:
here that I wrote the UnPlug extension, so someone else should decide if that is notable or not. I'll have a quick glance down the list and get rid of any that are obviously not notable. --
1916:
658:
Uh, no, encyclopedias should "have everything", and this isn't everything, it's an arbitrary unauthoritative partial list, is contrary to WP standards, and is quite pointless. --
883:
is a "martial arts directory," and so forth. And there are plenty of other articles, portals, projects, etc that essentially boil down to being "software directories," such as
1901:
1582:
FireGPG was removed from this article. There was a bit of internal policy that didn't get introduced into the AfD, where this page is a list of extensions that follows the
823:. Probably 99% (ummm... citation needed?) of users have TabMixPlus installed (or would want to know about it if they didn't). So, that's three examples that (arguably)
63:
862:
The problem is that some extensions have a page on addons.mozilla.org, Some have a page at mozdev.org, some have a separate homepage, and some extensions have all three.
1230:
I propose we remove any extensions that do not have articles themselves and remove the competition section - as this section is entirely made up of redlinks it seems.
1104:. They are similar for the user, and might as well both be included in this article. And somewhere we need to have an article section that explains the differences.
1921:
912:
was under afd. I thought that was silly myself, but compared to that, this list is mostly a bunch of links to other sites. You may also wish to look at WP:NOT (
1871:
879:
Why is this list any less appropriate for Knowledge (XXG) than any of the other numerous lists on Knowledge (XXG)? Just as this is a "software directory," the
436:
575:
329:
938:
I have deprodded the article but it needs a fair amount of work to get rid of the non-notable and unimportant items in the list. How can we go about this?-
1861:
1344:
I was looking for more information about the NoScript extension. NoScript redirects to this page (List of Firefox extensions). This page has a link to
1298:
I have gone through and done a bit more. I have removed an image which was cluttered and didn't show anything specific, removed links to sites that fail
426:
1408:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
1405:
1911:
1846:
1039:
I believe we should keep the lists separate because the bottom list keeps accumulating entries for non-notable extensions like cheesy toolbars. Note:
909:
565:
319:
1432:
1424:
1420:
1397:
1514:
This article is definetly being manipulate by someone w/ a 24 hour staff. Edits to page are being removed almost immeditley 24 hours a day. - TxS
1606:
Whats the reason behind the sections "Offical", "Firefox Companions", and "Google"? Those should not be given a special category of their own. --
974:
I've zapped some which were under "Open source extensions" and renamed the section "Notable extensions". The list below I haven't checked yet. --
402:
1856:
1851:
1436:
541:
295:
1866:
1841:
807:
for what makes a valid entry into wikipedia: if something exists out there that is popular and cited in multiple places (or, is notoriously
66:. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see
1521:
1679:
suggest deletion. Perhaps listing the 10 MOST DOWNLOADED ADDONS depending on version number (only major updates) would be more useful.
1465:
1586:
policy. Only extensions that are notable enough to have their own article pages are noted here, otherwise there would be thousands.
594:
508:
385:
352:
776:
Should there be a standard criteria for something to appear on this page? There are thousands of extensions now and with sites like
532:
503:
455:
357:
286:
247:
202:
176:
1906:
836:
653:
Yes, this is an encyclopedia. It doesn't matter if other organizations have the info, this encyclopedia should have everything.
151:
1881:
1048:
1000:
1695:
996:
bet everyone who adds extensions to the page thinks the extension they're adding is notable. :-) Makes sense? Cheers, --
827:
be included. Until an extension is "well known" (either for good reasons or bad) it shouldn't be included. (imho). -
1826:
1805:
1786:
1756:
1729:
1714:
1665:
1650:
1635:
1615:
1595:
1554:
1529:
1509:
1490:
1473:
1448:
1370:
1352:
1327:
1306:
1293:
1278:
1262:
1237:
1217:
1160:
1134:
1120:
1108:
1089:
1079:
1060:
1026:
1012:
988:
978:
966:
953:
942:
925:
899:
869:
850:
840:
788:
766:
707:
685:
675:
662:
91:
43:
1568:
1196:
754:
I think this would be a great idea. This article should also link to the extension's homepage next to the extension.
1075:
Should the Knowledge (XXG) link to the extension Sage be removed? It just redirects to the extension list, anyways.
1725:
1057:
1009:
892:
465:
1801:
1564:
So apparently FireGPG redirects here. The AfD for it was closed as a merge to this article. Where did it go? --
1486:
1444:
623:
Or, should those links not exist, and instead should the name of each extension be a clickable external link?
157:
1817:
I understand. Well, I just want to learn how to make a Featured List but I'll read more about it. Thanks. --
1525:
1469:
1683:
1517:
1461:
1227:
So, we need to clean this article up as it is currently suffering from a bit of fluff. How can we do this?
985:
922:
207:
181:
398:
1482:
1323:
Just removed a few more. Many were recent additions probably. Also shortened some of the descriptions. -
659:
1349:
1105:
672:
540:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
401:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
294:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1393:
699:
Extensions by Categ I think we have added enough of extentison. So anymore of edit should be stopped.
272:
262:
241:
1721:
1633:
1552:
1416:
1388:
1053:
1045:
1005:
997:
888:
884:
880:
647:
1392:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
1203:
682:
84:
59:
1812:
1797:
1768:
1440:
1248:
1131:
832:
115:
1254:
I would start with a cleanup and only then, if it gets small enough for that, consider the merger.
1687:
1496:
This is the advantage of sites like EditThis where you can get your own personal wiki. That way,
1290:
1275:
1657:
1607:
1744:
984:
I'd say a lot of hard work. I'll check for a template, see if there's something appropriate.
17:
1822:
1782:
1752:
1188:
1583:
1540:
What are the accepted notability guidelines for which Firefox extensions deserve articles? --
1691:
1505:
1367:
627:
1192:
959:
626:
Would the page be more useful if the extensions were sorted in categories like they are at
1710:
1661:
1646:
1622:
1611:
1591:
1565:
1541:
1178:
1101:
1076:
847:
755:
278:
1409:
1299:
762:
this page definently needs to be categorized. also, a link for each extension is a must-
1117:
896:
828:
620:
Should the "download" / "more info" links be moved to the end of each extension blurb?
1380:
860:
The 'More Info' links are a bit of a mess. You never know wher it's going to take you.
1835:
1303:
1234:
939:
914:
Knowledge (XXG) is neither a mirror nor a repository of links, images, or media files
704:
681:
i think the addition of a table of contents would allow for more intuitive perusal. -
584:
1818:
1793:
1778:
1748:
1458:
isn't it biased to prefer some extensions for inclusion in this list over others?
1086:
1023:
975:
963:
950:
866:
815:. There is already another article about (and a number of internet references to)
812:
796:
785:
763:
1497:
1572:
1501:
1214:
1157:
1040:
524:
497:
445:
377:
346:
195:
170:
1706:
1642:
1587:
1324:
1259:
1174:
667:
On a side note, the descriptions are ridiculously self-promoting. And IE View
268:
718:
It would be nice to have some categories for the long list of FF extensions:
918:
Knowledge (XXG) is not a directory of everything that exists or has existed.
816:
394:
94:. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
1345:
1182:
1100:"Extensions" and "Plugins" are terms Mozilla uses for different kinds of
537:
390:
291:
1151:
the article to give prominence to the more notable extensions, and then
1170:
I expected some opposition to listing Microsoft Firefox extensions :-)
1364:
1200:
811:
and cited in multiple places). For instance, there is a book about
1897:
List-Class Free and open-source software articles of Low-importance
1621:
I agree. The current divisions, and ordering, seems arbitrary. --
1404:
Knowledge (XXG) article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
1575:
1777:). Would you please like to help me make it a Features list? --
643:
1745:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Discontinued_Firefox_add-ons
1251:
was suggested there. As an editor I'm opening that discussion.
820:
133:
79:
26:
1379:
803:
in wikipedia however could remain useful if sticking to the
784:) anyone can put together a toolbar extension in 10 minutes
703:
Then what is the use of having a list in the first place? --
639:
583:
464:
444:
777:
635:
819:, a reasonable implementation of a very common protocol,
1674:
What actually makes an extension eligible for this list?
1193:
http://www.perpetual-motion.com/IdentitySelector.xpi.zip
290:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
1774:
1179:
http://media.labs.live.com/all/ps/_code_/photosynth.xpi
1152:
1148:
71:
67:
38:
1892:
Low-importance Free and open-source software articles
536:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
389:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1435:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
1877:List-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
1156:before adding the extension into this list again.
64:List of free and recommended Mozilla WebExtensions
1887:List-Class Free and open-source software articles
1773:I rewrote this page from scratch (please see the
1114:At least within the Firefox software (Tools-: -->
1125:Mozilla uses the term "Add-ons" to refer to the
205:, a project which is currently considered to be
114:(no consensus; proposed cleanup and/or merge to
1917:List-Class software articles of Mid-importance
1022:NoScript. I'd be for merging the two lists. --
8:
1425:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline
1902:All Free and open-source software articles
492:
341:
236:
165:
139:
137:
910:List of video games published by Nintendo
617:How can this page be made easier to use?
1116:then, plug-ins might be questionable). —
1376:Fair use rationale for Image:Puzzlr.png
1195:, but its not an official extension as
1085:Well spotted! I've removed the link. --
494:
343:
238:
167:
1922:Unknown-importance Computing articles
411:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computing
7:
1872:Unknown-importance software articles
550:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Software
530:This article is within the scope of
383:This article is within the scope of
304:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Internet
284:This article is within the scope of
201:This article is within the scope of
1365:http://telega.phpnet.us/simplemail/
217:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Mozilla
156:It is of interest to the following
1271:I made a - fairly ruthless - start
25:
1862:Low-importance Computing articles
1912:Mid-importance software articles
1847:Low-importance Internet articles
1705:deleting the article over this?
1423:. Using one of the templates at
523:
496:
376:
345:
271:
261:
240:
194:
169:
138:
83:
39:Comparison of Firefox extensions
30:
1199:doesnt work for Microsoft (see
1197:Kevin Miller (not a radio host)
671:IE Tab! I'll do some fixing. --
570:This article has been rated as
431:This article has been rated as
324:This article has been rated as
90:This article was nominated for
18:Talk:List of Firefox extensions
1715:15:15, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
1602:Section ordering of extensions
1437:Media copyright questions page
841:22:45, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
414:Template:WikiProject Computing
1:
1857:List-Class Computing articles
1852:WikiProject Internet articles
1596:02:12, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
1491:23:24, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
1406:boilerplate fair use template
1247:on this. Cleanup, or mergeto
1135:04:08, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
1027:18:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
1013:03:20, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
989:00:30, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
979:22:18, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
967:21:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
954:21:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
943:20:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
926:00:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
900:20:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
789:21:40, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
686:04:56, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
592:This article is supported by
553:Template:WikiProject Software
544:and see a list of open tasks.
476:Free and open-source software
473:This article is supported by
453:This article is supported by
405:and see a list of open tasks.
362:Free and open-source software
307:Template:WikiProject Internet
298:and see a list of open tasks.
1867:List-Class software articles
1842:List-Class Internet articles
1827:11:09, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
1806:10:42, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
1787:05:26, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
1757:07:25, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
1555:18:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
1498:I can be as biased as I want
1449:19:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
1433:criteria for speedy deletion
1371:21:39, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
1121:16:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
1109:15:28, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
1090:22:47, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
1080:01:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
1061:22:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
758:20:19, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
220:Template:WikiProject Mozilla
118:), 20 April 2007 (UTC), see
1738:Articles for new extensions
1730:07:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
1474:19:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
870:17:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
851:14:20, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
767:15:56, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
104:, 30 March 2010 (UTC), see
1938:
1698:) 05:15, 25 September 2009
1510:19:58, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
1417:the image description page
1307:21:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
1294:20:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
1279:20:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
1263:20:57, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
1238:20:51, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
1218:23:32, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
1161:06:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
731:Behaviour & Navigation
708:22:36, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
676:21:28, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
576:project's importance scale
437:project's importance scale
330:project's importance scale
1666:14:03, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
1651:00:33, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
1636:16:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
1616:11:39, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
1530:15:39, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
1419:and edit it to include a
1353:15:22, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
1328:01:14, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
893:Comparison of FTP clients
663:07:55, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
640:http://kb.mozillazine.org
613:Making page easier to use
591:
569:
518:
472:
452:
430:
371:
323:
256:
189:
164:
70:; for its talk page, see
1398:explanation or rationale
714:Extensions by Categories
1147:Due to the Afd, I have
636:http://wiki.mozilla.org
1907:All Computing articles
1536:Notability guidelines?
1384:
1096:Plugins vs. Extensions
760:
588:
469:
449:
399:information technology
146:This article is rated
1882:All Software articles
1400:as to why its use in
1383:
1223:Ways to clean this up
752:
595:WikiProject Computing
587:
468:
448:
386:WikiProject Computing
150:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1340:Circular References?
1243:I've just closed an
889:List of web browsers
885:Portal:Free software
881:List of martial arts
533:WikiProject Software
456:WikiProject Software
287:WikiProject Internet
58:. Its contents were
54:with a consensus to
1289:All done, I think.
1249:Extension (Mozilla)
203:WikiProject Mozilla
116:Extension (Mozilla)
1421:fair use rationale
1385:
734:Privacy / Security
628:addons.mozilla.org
589:
470:
450:
417:Computing articles
152:content assessment
42:was nominated for
1700:
1686:comment added by
1532:
1520:comment added by
1476:
1464:comment added by
1233:Any other ideas?-
1058:how's my driving?
1010:how's my driving?
610:
609:
606:
605:
602:
601:
556:software articles
491:
490:
487:
486:
340:
339:
336:
335:
310:Internet articles
235:
234:
231:
230:
132:
131:
128:
127:
78:
77:
16:(Redirected from
1929:
1816:
1772:
1699:
1680:
1631:
1625:
1550:
1544:
1515:
1459:
1396:but there is no
1389:Image:Puzzlr.png
1051:
1003:
986:FrozenPurpleCube
934:Deprodded but...
923:FrozenPurpleCube
558:
557:
554:
551:
548:
527:
520:
519:
514:
511:
500:
493:
419:
418:
415:
412:
409:
380:
373:
372:
367:
364:
349:
342:
312:
311:
308:
305:
302:
281:
276:
275:
265:
258:
257:
252:
244:
237:
225:
224:
223:Mozilla articles
221:
218:
215:
198:
191:
190:
185:
173:
166:
149:
143:
142:
141:
134:
96:
95:
87:
80:
34:
33:
27:
21:
1937:
1936:
1932:
1931:
1930:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1832:
1831:
1810:
1766:
1764:
1740:
1722:Nikolay Komarov
1681:
1676:
1629:
1623:
1604:
1562:
1548:
1542:
1538:
1456:
1378:
1360:
1342:
1225:
1215:John Vandenberg
1168:
1158:John Vandenberg
1145:
1098:
1073:
1049:
1001:
958:I should put a
936:
877:
858:
805:normal criteria
782:Effective Brand
774:
716:
697:
648:unforgettableid
615:
555:
552:
549:
546:
545:
512:
506:
416:
413:
410:
407:
406:
365:
355:
309:
306:
303:
300:
299:
279:Internet portal
277:
270:
250:
222:
219:
216:
213:
212:
179:
147:
52:3 February 2022
31:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1935:
1933:
1925:
1924:
1919:
1914:
1909:
1904:
1899:
1894:
1889:
1884:
1879:
1874:
1869:
1864:
1859:
1854:
1849:
1844:
1834:
1833:
1830:
1829:
1813:Damien Linnane
1808:
1798:Damien Linnane
1769:Damien Linnane
1763:
1760:
1739:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1675:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1638:
1603:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1561:
1558:
1537:
1534:
1494:
1493:
1483:DemonCleanerUK
1455:
1452:
1441:BetacommandBot
1377:
1374:
1359:
1356:
1341:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1266:
1265:
1255:
1252:
1224:
1221:
1210:
1209:
1206:
1186:
1167:
1164:
1144:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1097:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1072:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1016:
1015:
992:
991:
972:
971:
970:
969:
935:
932:
931:
930:
929:
928:
876:
873:
863:
861:
857:
854:
844:
843:
773:
770:
751:
750:
747:
744:
741:
738:
735:
732:
729:
728:File Downloads
726:
723:
715:
712:
711:
710:
696:
693:
679:
678:
665:
660:71.102.194.130
655:
654:
614:
611:
608:
607:
604:
603:
600:
599:
590:
580:
579:
572:Mid-importance
568:
562:
561:
559:
542:the discussion
528:
516:
515:
513:Mid‑importance
501:
489:
488:
485:
484:
481:Low-importance
471:
461:
460:
451:
441:
440:
433:Low-importance
429:
423:
422:
420:
403:the discussion
381:
369:
368:
366:Low‑importance
350:
338:
337:
334:
333:
326:Low-importance
322:
316:
315:
313:
296:the discussion
283:
282:
266:
254:
253:
251:Low‑importance
245:
233:
232:
229:
228:
226:
199:
187:
186:
174:
162:
161:
155:
144:
130:
129:
126:
125:
124:
123:
109:
88:
76:
75:
50:was closed on
48:The discussion
35:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1934:
1923:
1920:
1918:
1915:
1913:
1910:
1908:
1905:
1903:
1900:
1898:
1895:
1893:
1890:
1888:
1885:
1883:
1880:
1878:
1875:
1873:
1870:
1868:
1865:
1863:
1860:
1858:
1855:
1853:
1850:
1848:
1845:
1843:
1840:
1839:
1837:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1814:
1809:
1807:
1803:
1799:
1795:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1784:
1780:
1776:
1770:
1762:Featured list
1761:
1759:
1758:
1754:
1750:
1746:
1737:
1731:
1727:
1723:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1712:
1708:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1697:
1693:
1689:
1685:
1673:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1648:
1644:
1639:
1637:
1634:
1632:
1628:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1577:
1574:
1570:
1567:
1559:
1557:
1556:
1553:
1551:
1547:
1535:
1533:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1522:69.136.28.175
1519:
1512:
1511:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1453:
1451:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1439:. Thank you.
1438:
1434:
1428:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1415:Please go to
1413:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1390:
1382:
1375:
1373:
1372:
1369:
1366:
1357:
1355:
1354:
1351:
1350:66.227.132.25
1347:
1339:
1329:
1326:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1308:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1292:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1280:
1277:
1274:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1264:
1261:
1256:
1253:
1250:
1246:
1245:AfD discusson
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1236:
1231:
1228:
1222:
1220:
1219:
1216:
1207:
1204:
1201:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1187:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1165:
1163:
1162:
1159:
1154:
1150:
1142:
1136:
1133:
1128:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1119:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1107:
1106:69.87.203.136
1103:
1095:
1091:
1088:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1078:
1070:
1062:
1059:
1055:
1052:
1047:
1042:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1028:
1025:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1014:
1011:
1007:
1004:
999:
994:
993:
990:
987:
983:
982:
981:
980:
977:
968:
965:
961:
957:
956:
955:
952:
947:
946:
945:
944:
941:
933:
927:
924:
919:
915:
911:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
898:
894:
890:
886:
882:
874:
872:
871:
868:
855:
853:
852:
849:
842:
838:
834:
830:
826:
822:
818:
814:
810:
806:
802:
798:
793:
792:
791:
790:
787:
783:
779:
771:
769:
768:
765:
759:
757:
748:
745:
742:
740:Music / Video
739:
736:
733:
730:
727:
725:Website Links
724:
721:
720:
719:
713:
709:
706:
702:
701:
700:
694:
692:
688:
687:
684:
677:
674:
673:76.64.190.236
670:
666:
664:
661:
657:
656:
652:
651:
650:
649:
645:
641:
637:
631:
629:
624:
621:
618:
612:
597:
596:
586:
582:
581:
577:
573:
567:
564:
563:
560:
543:
539:
535:
534:
529:
526:
522:
521:
517:
510:
505:
502:
499:
495:
482:
479:(assessed as
478:
477:
467:
463:
462:
458:
457:
447:
443:
442:
438:
434:
428:
425:
424:
421:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
387:
382:
379:
375:
374:
370:
363:
359:
354:
351:
348:
344:
331:
327:
321:
318:
317:
314:
297:
293:
289:
288:
280:
274:
269:
267:
264:
260:
259:
255:
249:
246:
243:
239:
227:
210:
209:
204:
200:
197:
193:
192:
188:
183:
178:
175:
172:
168:
163:
159:
153:
145:
136:
135:
121:
117:
113:
110:
107:
103:
100:
99:
98:
97:
93:
89:
86:
82:
81:
73:
69:
65:
61:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
40:
36:
29:
28:
19:
1765:
1741:
1677:
1626:
1605:
1563:
1545:
1539:
1513:
1495:
1466:75.62.224.19
1457:
1429:
1414:
1401:
1387:
1386:
1361:
1343:
1291:Andy Mabbett
1276:Andy Mabbett
1272:
1232:
1229:
1226:
1211:
1169:
1146:
1143:The big cull
1126:
1099:
1074:
973:
937:
917:
913:
878:
859:
845:
824:
813:Greasemonkey
808:
804:
800:
797:astroturfing
781:
775:
761:
753:
722:Firefox Tabs
717:
698:
689:
680:
668:
632:
625:
622:
619:
616:
593:
571:
531:
474:
454:
432:
384:
325:
285:
206:
158:WikiProjects
111:
101:
55:
51:
37:
1682:—Preceding
1573:25 December
1516:—Preceding
1460:—Preceding
1368:Atomic1fire
1358:Simple Mail
1118:Erik Harris
1041:Open source
897:Erik Harris
68:its history
1836:Categories
1569:(contribs)
1175:photosynth
1149:rearranged
1077:Moronicles
960:disclosure
848:Jancikotuc
780:(formerly
756:Moronicles
669:criticizes
148:List-class
120:discussion
106:discussion
1189:CardSpace
1166:Microsoft
875:Deletion?
856:More Info
817:ChatZilla
809:unpopular
801:This page
746:Bookmarks
509:Computing
408:Computing
395:computing
391:computers
353:Computing
1696:contribs
1684:unsigned
1518:unsigned
1481:present.
1462:unsigned
1410:fair use
1394:fair use
1346:NoScript
1304:Localzuk
1235:Localzuk
1183:live.com
1132:Arantius
1054:ttableid
1006:ttableid
940:Localzuk
772:Criteria
737:Searches
547:Software
538:software
504:Software
358:Software
301:Internet
292:Internet
248:Internet
208:inactive
182:inactive
92:deletion
44:deletion
1819:Bawanio
1794:Bawanio
1779:Bawanio
1775:history
1749:Bawanio
1584:WP:WTAF
1560:FireGPG
1153:deleted
1102:Add-ons
1087:h2g2bob
1024:h2g2bob
976:h2g2bob
964:h2g2bob
951:h2g2bob
867:Aldaden
837:contrib
829:Michael
786:Aldaden
778:conduit
764:Noclips
574:on the
435:on the
328:on the
214:Mozilla
177:Mozilla
1688:Mtf612
1578:(GMT)
1571:23:19
1502:Nerd42
1127:dialog
1046:unforg
998:unforg
825:should
642:, and
397:, and
154:scale.
60:merged
1707:Rurik
1658:Nezek
1643:Rurik
1608:Nezek
1588:Rurik
1566:Gwern
1454:Bias?
1325:Nabla
1300:WP:EL
1260:Nabla
1181:(see
749:Other
743:Email
705:Bruce
695:Query
644:Devmo
62:into
56:merge
1823:talk
1802:talk
1783:talk
1753:talk
1747:. --
1726:talk
1711:talk
1692:talk
1662:talk
1647:talk
1627:Zala
1612:talk
1592:talk
1576:2008
1546:Zala
1526:talk
1506:talk
1500:. --
1487:talk
1470:talk
1445:talk
1402:this
1202:and
1071:Sage
916:and
833:talk
646:. --
112:Keep
102:Keep
72:here
1792:Hi
1630:Bim
1624:Zim
1549:Bim
1543:Zim
821:IRC
683:Nod
630:?
566:Mid
427:Low
320:Low
46:.
1838::
1825:)
1804:)
1785:)
1755:)
1728:)
1713:)
1694:•
1664:)
1656:--
1649:)
1614:)
1594:)
1528:)
1508:)
1489:)
1472:)
1447:)
1412:.
1258:-
1191::
1177::
1056:|
1044:--
1008:|
949:--
891:,
887:,
839:)
638:,
507::
483:).
393:,
360:/
356::
1821:(
1815::
1811:@
1800:(
1781:(
1771::
1767:@
1751:(
1724:(
1709:(
1690:(
1660:(
1645:(
1610:(
1590:(
1524:(
1504:(
1485:(
1468:(
1443:(
1205:)
1185:)
1050:e
1002:e
835:|
831:(
598:.
578:.
459:.
439:.
332:.
211:.
184:)
180:(
160::
122:.
108:.
74:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
