Talk:List of Nobel laureates in Physiology or Medicine/Archive 1

31: 348:- I do not believe this image was created by the NIH. Note at the source how it says "The National Library of Medicine's Profiles in Science program has made every effort to secure proper permissions for posting items on the web site. In this instance, however, it has either not been possible to identify or contact the current copyright owner." We need information on who the copyright holder is. 745: 669: 625:

Edwin G. Krebs (1992), Edward B. Lewis (1995), Leland H. Hartwell (2001), H. Robert Horvitz (2002), Sir Robert G. Edwards (2010), Ralph M. Steinman (2011), and James E. Rothman (2013). I may have missed one or two. Is there a specific reason these people do not have photos here? If not, could people more experienced than I please fill in the gaps?

179: 415:

indicates that the copyright holder is unknown: "The National Library of Medicine's Profiles in Science program has made every effort to secure proper permissions for posting items on the web site. In this instance, however, it has either not been possible to identify or contact the current copyright

503:

states "The National Library of Medicine's Profiles in Science program has made every effort to secure proper permissions for posting items on the web site. In this instance, however, it has either not been possible to identify or contact the current copyright owner." - I don't see any evidence that

624:

I noticed that a lot of pictures are missing, namely the ones for John Franklin Enders (1954), Sir Bernard Katz (1970), Karl von Frisch (1973), Allan M. Cormack (1979), George D. Snell (1980), David H. Hubel (1981), Bengt I. Samuelsson (1982), Georges J.F. Köhler (1984), Joseph E. Murray (1990),

111:- I'm a bit confused on the source here - it is listed as the Instituto Cajal, Madrid. What does that mean, exactly? Also, the license asserts that the image was published before 1923 - is that in the US and in Spain? What evidence do we have to verify the date provided in the image description? 201:- This image is licensed under the "life of the author + 70 years", but we don't know who the author is. If this was published before Nicole died, we can easily justify a pre-1923 license, because he died in 1922. Do you know if it was published before he died? 299:- This image claims to be in the PD because it is a work of the NLM, however the link to that page clearly indicates that not everything at the NLM is a government work and therefore in the PD. We need some evidence that this photograph is a government work. 190:- We cannot use the "life of the author + 70 years" license, since we do not know who the author is. I would suggest a pre-1923 license. Do you know where the image was first published (that will determine which 1923 license)? 582:- The source says "Courtesy Baruj Benacerraf" - it is not entirely clear if that is referring to the text or the image, but I would guess the image, suggesting it is not a work of the US government as claimed by the license. 771:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. 695:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. 530:- There is no evidence that this image was made by the federal government, as claimed by the license. Note that at the source, there are definitely non-governmental images, such as the cover of 47: 17: 488:- The source link does not work for this image, which means that the license is not verifiable. Could you fix the link? Also, the image description page needs to be filled out. 519: