Knowledge

Talk:List of RAL colours

Source 📝

82: 64: 154: 33: 443: 558:
The CIELAB colors listed here do not match other sources on the web, raising the question of where they were sourced. Hopefully not mathematically derived from RGB values! As this article only exists to provide colorimetric data, it is important to make sure the data provided is absolutely correct.
536:
Can the L*a*b* (CIELAB) colours be checked against the RAL standard, and/or where did they come from? With what observer and what light source were they taken? There seems to be no consensus on the web which L*a*b* colour belongs to which RAL colour, although the webshop of RAL sells an application
578:
I note that as of 28/3/2016, RAL 1021 is described as "Rapeseed yellow". This is not the correct colour description, the correct description is "rape yellow". The table on this page is copied from the standard, as referenced, and thus must agree with the standard, even though some people do not
663:
A site describing "pure white" as #FFFFFF sounds more like an assumption than a reference to the RAL colour chart, because thats what "pure white" usually means. FWIW I have seen fairly good agreement between colour values on different sites (www.ral-farben.de/en/all-ral-colours vs
829:
at the bottom. Copying the entire table from the RAL Design System+ section to a sandbox and previewing shows no errors. My guess is that coltit is adding too much overhead given the large list of entries in this article. Any thoughts on how it could be fixed?
653:
Good question. Your're right, the tool tip Hex codes as well as the visible colors differ from the correct RAL ones. In the german disc archive about the RAL color list there have been mentioned possible legal
499:
If you would look in the policy you could find that "I fail to see what purpose it serves." is not listed as a valid reason for deletion. Stop the vandal or test edits and read and learn WP policies.
638:
uses #F1ECE1. Did I grab the wrong standard? Is the 24bit hex RGB encoding not accurate enough? Anyway, there's little consensus on the web about RAL 9010 as some sites even state #FFFFFF.
579:
like it. In particular, the story thast hit the UK recently, does not change what the standard calles this shade, even though some retailer has decided to relabel their cans of paint.
537:
that allows to convert to L*a*b*. CIELAB appears to be a good choise if a list is made, because it is an absolute colometric measure, if the whitepoint is specified (as far as I read).
544: 611: 453: 664:
encycolorpedia.com vs ralcolorchart.com (no relation)). Is it possible that somebody has taken the Lab colour values and translated them to RGB instead of sRGB?
822: 701:
It's not included in the RAL color system. So it's just a product from one company labeled with a name which doesn't belong to the official RAL colors. --
845:
I fixed it with a bit of a kludge using a much-simplified emulation of the template. The errors can be seen in the revision prior to my edit which was
890: 126: 559:
Otherwise, it serves no useful purpose and may cause harm (wasting the time of those who consult it and use it in projects) and should be deleted.
132: 635: 687: 895: 665: 885: 548: 102: 846: 587:
Is there any reason why all the examples are German? Seems a little unbalanced considering how widely used the system is.
44: 513:
But as repeated stated, the reason for deletion is a lack of notability - you have not addressed that. And please read
98: 94: 89: 69: 785: 564: 449: 658: 691: 669: 607: 560: 781: 686:
If you google this you'll find lots of products. What's the deal with it? I can't find it on RAL's site.
643: 50: 721:
This article is currently showing errors, see "Node-count limit exceeded" at the bottom and the broken
634:
The tool tip RGB colour code might not match the standard. For instance, RAL 9010 states #F7F9EF while
540: 482: 639: 442: 399: 386: 373: 359: 344: 329: 314: 299: 284: 269: 254: 239: 224: 210: 197: 174: 854: 835: 818: 748: 706: 619: 504: 471: 867: 772: 592: 603: 811: 762: 732: 602:
The company behind RAL is located in Germany and the RAL-Design-System is their product:
485:
is a reason for deletion. Note that your disagreeing with it does not make it vandalism.
17: 879: 850: 831: 744: 702: 615: 522: 514: 500: 490: 467: 864: 802: 769: 738: 725: 588: 870: 858: 839: 789: 775: 752: 710: 695: 673: 647: 623: 596: 568: 552: 526: 508: 494: 475: 517:
and don't shout vandalism every time you disagree with other peoples edits.
81: 63: 481:
If you had quoted the full reason for the prod you could note that lack of
518: 486: 466:"I fail to see what purpose it serves." - is not a reason for deletion. 731:
templates in the last table. I think that is due to recent edits at
758:
I'm trying to figure it out. I messed something up yesterday in
437: 148: 26: 612:
de:RAL Deutsches Institut fĂźr GĂźtesicherung und Kennzeichnung
807:
Some problems are showing in the article since you edited
101:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 657:
For booth topics take a look at the dewiki disk archive:
131:This article has not yet received a rating on the 863:Actually, no, I don't know how to fix this. — 8: 823:Category:Pages where node count is exceeded 93:, an attempt to structure and organize all 768:, but I thought I feixed it in the end. — 538: 171: 160: 58: 32: 30: 743:Would you please check what is going on? 97:. If you wish to help, please visit the 574:Arbitrarily changing RAL colo(u)r names 60: 821:section. The article is in the hidden 819:List of RAL colors#RAL Design System+ 7: 87:This article is within the scope of 49:It is of interest to the following 545:2001:983:89F9:1:BC62:35C:33E9:8DAF 25: 891:Unknown-importance List articles 441: 152: 80: 62: 31: 448:This article was nominated for 780:I have the same problem too.-- 659:de:Diskussion:RAL-Farbe/Archiv 452:on 19 May 2013. The result of 1: 776:15:18, 28 February 2020 (UTC) 753:06:46, 28 February 2020 (UTC) 711:23:50, 19 February 2018 (UTC) 674:16:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC) 648:22:37, 23 November 2016 (UTC) 624:23:46, 19 February 2018 (UTC) 696:22:02, 12 October 2017 (UTC) 569:23:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC) 111:Knowledge:WikiProject Lists 912: 896:WikiProject Lists articles 871:14:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC) 859:09:08, 11 March 2020 (UTC) 840:02:55, 10 March 2020 (UTC) 553:22:39, 3 August 2015 (UTC) 133:project's importance scale 114:Template:WikiProject Lists 825:and is showing junk like 790:16:02, 2 March 2020 (UTC) 608:de:RAL gemeinnützige GmbH 434:Historic deletion request 130: 75: 57: 886:List-Class List articles 597:11:50, 1 July 2016 (UTC) 527:16:40, 19 May 2013 (UTC) 509:16:34, 19 May 2013 (UTC) 495:16:14, 19 May 2013 (UTC) 476:16:09, 19 May 2013 (UTC) 95:list pages on Knowledge 18:Talk:List of RAL colors 682:RAL 9910 "hipca white" 39:This article is rated 583:Color names in german 604:de:RAL-Design-System 796:Node count exceeded 178: 175:List of RAL colours 387:RAL Design System+ 172: 45:content assessment 827:rgb=249,234,235}} 555: 543:comment added by 515:assume good faith 464: 463: 431: 430: 426: 425: 422: 421: 173:Section size for 147: 146: 143: 142: 139: 138: 90:WikiProject Lists 16:(Redirected from 903: 828: 816: 810: 806: 767: 761: 742: 730: 724: 445: 438: 362: 347: 332: 317: 302: 287: 272: 257: 242: 227: 225:Yellow and beige 179: 161: 156: 155: 149: 119: 118: 115: 112: 109: 84: 77: 76: 66: 59: 42: 36: 35: 34: 27: 21: 911: 910: 906: 905: 904: 902: 901: 900: 876: 875: 826: 814: 808: 800: 798: 765: 759: 736: 733:Template:Coltit 728: 722: 719: 684: 632: 585: 576: 561:Paul Coddington 436: 427: 358: 345:White and black 343: 328: 313: 298: 283: 268: 253: 238: 223: 166: 153: 116: 113: 110: 107: 106: 43:on Knowledge's 40: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 909: 907: 899: 898: 893: 888: 878: 877: 874: 873: 861: 817:and added the 797: 794: 793: 792: 778: 718: 715: 714: 713: 688:86.127.104.145 683: 680: 679: 678: 677: 676: 655: 631: 630:RAL RGB values 628: 627: 626: 584: 581: 575: 572: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 462: 461: 454:the discussion 446: 435: 432: 429: 428: 424: 423: 420: 419: 416: 413: 409: 408: 405: 402: 396: 395: 392: 389: 383: 382: 379: 376: 370: 369: 366: 363: 355: 354: 351: 348: 340: 339: 336: 333: 325: 324: 321: 318: 310: 309: 306: 303: 295: 294: 291: 288: 280: 279: 276: 273: 265: 264: 261: 258: 250: 249: 246: 243: 235: 234: 231: 228: 220: 219: 216: 213: 207: 206: 203: 200: 194: 193: 191: 188: 186: 183: 177:(15 sections) 168: 167: 164: 159: 157: 145: 144: 141: 140: 137: 136: 129: 123: 122: 120: 85: 73: 72: 67: 55: 54: 48: 37: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 908: 897: 894: 892: 889: 887: 884: 883: 881: 872: 869: 866: 862: 860: 856: 852: 848: 844: 843: 842: 841: 837: 833: 824: 820: 813: 804: 795: 791: 787: 783: 782:𝒞𝒽ℯℯ𝓈ℯ𝒹ℴℊ 779: 777: 774: 771: 764: 757: 756: 755: 754: 750: 746: 740: 734: 727: 716: 712: 708: 704: 700: 699: 698: 697: 693: 689: 681: 675: 671: 667: 662: 661: 660: 656: 652: 651: 650: 649: 645: 641: 637: 629: 625: 621: 617: 613: 609: 605: 601: 600: 599: 598: 594: 590: 582: 580: 573: 571: 570: 566: 562: 556: 554: 550: 546: 542: 528: 524: 520: 516: 512: 511: 510: 506: 502: 498: 497: 496: 492: 488: 484: 483:WP:notability 480: 479: 478: 477: 473: 469: 459: 455: 451: 447: 444: 440: 439: 433: 417: 414: 411: 410: 406: 403: 401: 398: 397: 393: 390: 388: 385: 384: 380: 377: 375: 372: 371: 367: 364: 361: 357: 356: 352: 349: 346: 342: 341: 337: 334: 331: 327: 326: 322: 319: 316: 312: 311: 307: 304: 301: 297: 296: 292: 289: 286: 282: 281: 277: 274: 271: 267: 266: 262: 259: 256: 252: 251: 247: 244: 241: 237: 236: 232: 229: 226: 222: 221: 217: 214: 212: 209: 208: 204: 201: 199: 196: 195: 189: 184: 181: 180: 176: 170: 169: 165:Section sizes 163: 162: 158: 151: 150: 134: 128: 125: 124: 121: 117:List articles 104: 100: 96: 92: 91: 86: 83: 79: 78: 74: 71: 68: 65: 61: 56: 52: 46: 38: 29: 28: 19: 799: 720: 685: 666:82.18.16.235 633: 586: 577: 557: 539:— Preceding 535: 465: 457: 182:Section name 99:project page 88: 51:WikiProjects 717:Page errors 636:page source 211:RAL Classic 880:Categories 400:References 374:RAL Effect 103:discussion 41:List-class 865:Christoph 847:permalink 770:Christoph 640:Hummeling 851:Johnuniq 832:Johnuniq 745:Johnuniq 703:Angerdan 616:Angerdan 541:unsigned 501:HSRtrack 468:HSRtrack 450:deletion 418:323,534 394:224,870 360:Overview 803:Crissov 739:Crissov 654:issues. 589:ProfDEH 415:323,534 391:224,870 381:30,484 368:41,152 218:67,535 190:Section 812:coltit 763:coltit 378:30,484 365:41,152 353:1,731 338:2,216 323:3,735 308:5,164 293:2,962 278:1,293 270:Violet 263:2,761 248:2,378 240:Orange 233:4,127 192:total 47:scale. 868:Päper 773:Päper 412:Total 350:1,731 335:2,216 330:Brown 320:3,735 305:5,164 300:Green 290:2,962 275:1,293 260:2,761 245:2,378 230:4,127 198:(Top) 187:count 108:Lists 70:Lists 855:talk 836:talk 786:talk 749:talk 707:talk 692:talk 670:talk 644:talk 620:talk 593:talk 565:talk 549:talk 523:talk 505:talk 491:talk 472:talk 458:keep 456:was 407:160 315:Grey 285:Blue 205:485 185:Byte 726:rgb 519:noq 487:noq 404:160 255:Red 202:485 127:??? 882:: 857:) 849:. 838:) 815:}} 809:{{ 788:) 766:}} 760:{{ 751:) 735:. 729:}} 723:{{ 709:) 694:) 672:) 646:) 622:) 614:-- 610:, 606:, 595:) 567:) 551:) 525:) 507:) 493:) 474:) 215:16 853:( 834:( 805:: 801:@ 784:( 747:( 741:: 737:@ 705:( 690:( 668:( 642:( 618:( 591:( 563:( 547:( 521:( 503:( 489:( 470:( 460:. 135:. 105:. 53:: 20:)

Index

Talk:List of RAL colors
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Lists
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Lists
list pages on Knowledge
project page
discussion
???
project's importance scale
List of RAL colours
(Top)
RAL Classic
Yellow and beige
Orange
Red
Violet
Blue
Green
Grey
Brown
White and black
Overview
RAL Effect
RAL Design System+
References
Articles for deletion
deletion

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑