662:
behind the events of 1929 (maybe a bit of possesivness mixed with the logic of having a federation headquarters in the country capital) the entire perspective nowadays is a bit different. It is a fact that
Yugoslav football lived allways in this Serbo-Croat antagonism and rivalry, but also the fact that Serbia tried to keep together the illed Yugoslavia, while Croatia was the first, along Slovenia, to leave it in 1991. Croatia also basically left in 1941 to return in 1945... All this makes somehow Serbia the one that kept that Federation going and alive calling others to stay when others were turning their backs and proudly building something of their own. To make it a bit pinturesque, Serbia was the one allways asking "
757:
Serbia". Either you challenge this or otherwise you are basing your opinions just on geographical units, which is random... You are entitled to make all the sorts of inclusion criteriums for the lists that WP policies allow, and so am I, and I made this one which is the one that sources support. Also, I kindly asked you suggest to me a better name if you feel uncomfortable with the title for some reason (as seems evident), however until a fair and correct suggestion isn´t made and subsequently accepted, I will keep this version as it is the one which is technically correct.
526:
one. If I remember, Croatia protested back then, but it made no difference in the final decition, so that is why perhaps what you consider common sense may differ from the other common senses. Basically for us in Serbia it doesn´t make sense having the large ammount of players separated in two lists as they in our view played allways for the same selection, and we receved the support of FIFA and UEFA for this view. It would also make no sense removing the
Croatian or other players that played in it, as they, after all, also played for this same NT.
1045:
forming their own national teams. Also, during all the periods
Serbian players formed the majority of the national team, and many played during different periods, thus not making much sense to have a separate list for each one of the periods. This list is a complete list of players that represented the same Football Association which during time had some territorial and name changes, only that. Joy seems to have missunderstood the purpose of the list, and he seems to ignore the official position of the ruling bodies over this issue.
179:
158:
74:
53:
1162:
national teams. That is why in fact all this players did represented the
Serbian football association (named Yugoslav back then) and did played for the Serbian national team (named Yugoslavia back then). This is the official position, and as I told you, Croatia complained but its complain was rejected. I am willing to adress your concerns, but I am not willing to make changes which are not supported by this facts I just mentioned.
609:(complementary website of the official UEFA one for historical purposes) clearly lists data that way as well (notece how former countries like Saar and others are listed at the left column, but Yugoslavia is not and it is included within Serbian NT). This is not "Serbian POV" against "common sense", but the official view that recognised things as such and FIFA and UEFA certailnly had their reasons to decide that way. That is why
84:
22:
674:"), so if adequatly sourced, presented and explained, there should be no problem in my view. That is why I indeed want you to help me with this, although in reality we don´t have much room for major explanations, as the list is already quite long, so that is why I limited myself to a short lead with links to the related articles where all is explained (I would even appreciate to have a
489:(the view why FIFA and UEFA had for taking the decition). I made an effort to make the inclusion criterium explicit in the lead, mentioning the different names. Anyway, I would definitely favour any fair siggestion I couldn´t find until here. What would you suggest? Title change? Some way of indicating next to a player name the exact period and NT he represented? Other ideas?
267:
246:
277:
1088:
different periods, something which is not supported by the official stand of the ruling bodies neither by any reliable sources. I already made a proposal of a title change in order to make it less ambiguos and more "supportable" for editors with Joy´s POV, however that is a good-faith suggestion on my behalve as the title is still correct the way it is.
1325:: we can see the "Foundation year: 1919" and the fact that they are putting in the statistics such as number of World Cup appearances them including the participations of Yugoslavia and Serbia&Montenegro along, thus clearly indicating they are considering Yugoslavia-Serbia&Montenegro-Serbia to be one and same national team.
1359:
Yugoslavia-Serbia&Montenegro-Serbia they all go together. Serbs were the majority of players in
Yugoslav NT and many continued playing after the change of names, so it is complicated to make separate statistics for each period, much better to have them listed all in one. To confirm it, I bring sources that do just the same:
590:
respective countries; I've never seen anyone in football refer to some player as someone who primarily plays for or represents their federation. Clearly federations are very much involved in the player-country relationship, but they in turn are primarily thought of as representatives of the countries themselves, not vice versa. --
628:
federation existed as a separate FIFA/UEFA member during
Yugoslavia - they were all voluntarily joined in a single federation, and this single federation was not the Serbian federation, it was the Yugoslav federation. Well, at least one would like to think that none of this was outright federation misappropriation, but given the
1036:(where he basically copy/pasted this list and removed some players) so he could claim duplication now. The inclusion criteriums are different and official sources back the fact that all players which have played for the Belgrade-based Football Federation are list together despite the name changes of the country that occured.
1422:
But that is a fact. You exposed your arguments in the discussions above, they totally match the
Croatian stance regarding the Serbian recognition as sole official successor of Yugoslav national team, and you are a Croatian Wikipedian, talk straight and open, dont try to disguise your real intentions
627:
You're using the wrong term for the UK example - countries do match, independent states don't. And my basic point stands - we say a player plays for Wales, which is a country, not just their federation. But in this case we don't have an analogy with any of that - it's not like the
Serbian or Croatian
1445:
You're intentionally misrepresenting my position as some sort of a specific argument, whereas it's nothing of the sort. Our readers, as myself, do not actually care for any such discussion that took place in any football organization, because it's meaningless to them. They care about the undisguised
1294:
teams. Lets talk straight and honest, Joy is a
Croatian-based Wikipedian and he is trying in this article to implement the Croatian objection of the FIFA and UEFA recognitions of successorship. The case is the following: the Yugoslav Football Association was formed in 1919 and gained admittance to
1008:
Listing them as "international footballers of predecessor teams to the Serbia team" is similarly problematic, because it leads to a slippery slope - all of the six former
Yugoslav republics could then get a list of their own, and each of them could include the whole list of Yugoslav players with the
1004:
I don't think it's appropriate to list Yugoslav players from the 1920s or the 1950s as "Serbia international footballers", because that's simply factually incorrect. They played for "Yugoslavia", not for "Serbia". Some of them can be said to have played for their individual republics, but the common
455:
But Joy, this is strictly football we are refering here. FIFA and UEFA had access to all documents and know the events, and at the end they decided this way. I had the article for some time as sandbox because I wanted to weight all possibilities. If we include Yugoslavia in title, then we should FRY
756:
Joy, the entire problem for you here is that FIFA and UEFA actually acknolledged Serbia to be the direct and only successor of all Belgrade-based federations, which include Yugoslavia since its creation. Once they acknolledged that, it is technically correct that they are all "predecessor teams of
1472:
You are not going to convince no one that the decitions of FIFA and UEFA on this matter are irrelevant. They ruled out Yugoslavia-Serbia&Montenegro-Serbia are one and same national team and group all together their statistics. So do we here on this list, and so do numerous websites, so what is
1087:
Also, in order to adress Joy´s concerns, I already asked him several times to make suggestions for a more appropriate title for this article, but now I find Joy´s attitude to be ambiguos, as he is not present in order to improve this article, but rather to acomplish the separation of the list into
661:
Regarding the issue in question, well, yes Joy, I am well aware of the football history of the region (I´m really passionate about it) and I am fully aware that football at the very beggining was more developed in Croatia than in Serbia. But soon the two matched eachother, and whatever the reasons
413:
Sorry Joy, but I beleave that Serbia is regarded by FIFA and UEFA as the only direct successor of K.Yugoslavia, SFRY, FRY and SCG. With regard of the other articles you mention (coincidentally I created and mostly keep updated the last one as well), I see no connection to this one, as none of them
1044:
recognise Serbia as the only official successor of all of this state entities: Kingdom of Yugoslavia, SFR Yugoslavia, FR Yugoslavia and Serbia and Montenegro. Serbia kept the national team affiliation in these organisations during all the time, with the rest of the counties separating appart and
525:
The first is that what you call common sense is not what had become accepted by the ruling powers. FIFA and UEFA actually recognise the current Serbian FA as being the same as YFA, just renamed, and that the other Federations left and created their own ones, with no effect to the "Belgrade-based"
1293:
Here is the thing. Croatian FA was the one that objected FIFA and UEFA recognition of FR Yugoslavia becoming the sole successor of Yugoslavia. Croatian objections were disregarded and today Serbia is considered the direct successor of Yugoslavia, FR Yugoslavia and Serbia&Montenegro national
1079:
official website that Serbian national team keeps the affiliation date in 1923 (the year the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes was affiliated) as the affiliation year, honours (1930 and 1962 World Cup 4th place) and all related statistics and data by including Yugoslavia history and results,
604:
Regarding your thought of country/FA (football association) I disagree, as actually mostly, but not allways, countries and FA´s coincide (UK exemple). The FA´s are the ones competing and forming national teams, so players are selected by them, not the country. Anyway, important websites for this
589:
where they don't seem to make any effort to explain their decision to dis the dissolution of Yugoslavia (heh), they just consistently classify member countries under member federations. This is probably fine under their own bylaws, but in general, players are widely considered to represent their
1161:
national team, a view that is supported by FIFA. I think you are missing the point that FIFA and all related organisms considers Yugoslavia and Serbia to be the same football association and national team, while the other counties secceded from it and formed their own football associations and
1302:
in 1921 and 1954 respectively. FIFA and UEFA are the, respectively World and European, ruling bodies of football (for the ones unfamiliarised with football). In 1991 the players of Slovenia and Croatia left the Yugoslav national team and formed their own respective ones. In 1992 Bosnian and
503:
Well that's just it, even if we throw common sense out the window and just call it a federation rename - they still did not play for the federation under the new name, but under the old one. They weren't clairvoyant so they couldn't know what could happen in 1991 and accept it as such, so we
470:
So they made a decision - why do you think it binds us with regard to this kind of an article? Besides, now that I think about it, we wouldn't be saying anything contrary to any such decision, we'd be simply saying the most clear and direct truth - if someone was an international player for
1351:
After the dissolution of the federation, and separation of Montenegro, on 28th June 2006, Football Association of Serbia became the national home of football, and was admitted to the membership of FIFA and UEFA, as legal successor to all the previous national associations whose part it
1358:
So resumingly, Joy is trying something Croatian FA already tried, which is to deny Serbian FA its recognition of sole successor of Yugoslav FA. He tried to convince us that Yugoslavia has separate articles from Serbia, but in matters of football statistics, for what matters,
529:
The second is that this list doesn´t prevent the creation of another one specifically for the pre-1992 period. If you notece I didn´t pretended nowhere to use this list to present it as the Yugoslav list, even if it may had been very usefull in the "See also" section of
355:
I figure this awkward part of the title, and in turn the confusing part of the article, was probably deemed a necessary compromise in order to have the article verifiable at reprezentacija.rs. It is nevertheless strange, and in conflict with common sense - if we want a
1031:
This is actually a duplication of the previous discussion where the same user failed to receve support for his edits. Everyone should read the previous discussion where all this was explained in detail. The only thing that changed since then was that Joy created the
1366:
the major and most reliable world-wide website for national teams, we can clearly see how they list all players together and even add at top the explanation of the name changes of the national team I talked about. Just in case of doubt, see how for instance at
909:
First you came opening a thread. Then what you asked failed to have even one support (please read Rich Farmbrough post and don´t distort his meaning), and then you simply reverted on your wish knowing you were opposed. Sorry Joy, but this is the plain trouth.
456:
and SCG as well, and all three are basically direct predecessors only of current day Serbian FA. I understand the possible dissatisfaction some non-Serb former-Yugoslavs may have, but the title is actually correct. Anyway, suggestions are allways welcomed.
1109:
The bottom line is still the same - the readers don't and shouldn't care for the intricate details of what constitutes the relation between "Serbia" and a player. Either the player played for Serbia, or they didn't. Or Yugoslavia. Or whatever other
853:
I don't see Rich Farmbrough actually objecting to the new layout. The current list layout is fair and accurate according to all definitions. If you want to haggle about it some more, please get a third opinion that explicitly supports your POV.
666:?" and keeping the house open... I suspect that was possibly this attitude one of the possible reasons for FIFA and UEFA to declare Serbia as the only successor of the old Yugoslavia. Anyway, this list is for Serbs a complete list of the kind "
886:
painstaking effort to weed out KoY and SFRY players. Despite the fact I've explained my position at length in advance and the fact the proper layout sat there from April 10 to May 25 untouched, IOW no readers saw it as against consensus.
1315:. So, because of this different names the national tam had troughout its history, if one makes a list of all players that played in it it has to name it the way the list it is named now. If anyone has sugestions, they are welcome.
432:
That's a valid point that has been raised but also disputed in the past. Even if the two organizations did accept new FSJ (now FSS) as successor to old FSJ, that still doesn't mean that they dictate common sense in general -
1498:
970:
992:
is the sole official successor of the Yugoslav Football Association (and the extent of this opinion is moot), that it's also the sole official successor of the national team of Yugoslavia. However, that
1400:
I stopped reading at the point where you accused me of promoting some POV of some specific national organization in some specific dispute. That's, well, just plain false, and such an accusation is an
1149:
But Joy, that is why I proposed to you a change in the title if you find it so ambiguos and I am still open to accept any reasonable proposals that would help to fix your concerns. However, the fact
882:, and then made a flurry of new changes. So I can't simply revert you again without either looking like a jerk myself (by making an outright revert that drops your new changes) or making
1446:
facts such as the fact that some player represented "Yugoslavia" in football tournaments. The intricate successor issue is something only misguided people such as yourself care about. --
471:"Yugoslavia", they were that. Calling such a person an international player of "Serbia", regardless of whether you add "(including predecessor teams)", is anachronistic and wrong. --
940:- so how are we to conclude anything? I gave it a prod with an explicit separation of lists, and now readers should see my point more clearly, maybe someone notices the new RFC. --
1333:
The Football Association of Serbia (FSS) is the successor to the Yugoslav Football Association founded in 1919 and is staging their first final tournament in their current form
581:
The larger list could continue exist to appease the Serbian POV, I guess, but it would still seem like a gross duplication, putting it at odds with the basic principles of
835:
Please feel free to have the list you created having an inclusion criterium of your choice, however please don´t make major changes of the kind you did in this one.
1568:
Notice "coherent". By association, all cumulus clouds are clouds, which doesn't mean we should go out of our way and merge their article into the cloud article. --
438:
392:
678:
section where all this issues would be expanded, but that doesn´t seem possible because of the lenght of the list, so even if we make one it has to be concise).
228:
1404:. I'm not interested in a further baseless flaming with you, so I'll just leave it at that. I hope others won't be dissuaded from participating by your rant. --
1494:
1308:
1286:
1033:
974:
963:
803:
708:
Well, if you want to put it that way, I'm fine with "They are all here", but for the time before 1992, "here" is defined as "Yugoslavia", not as "Serbia". --
561:
It would seem easy to create the additional lists if required, and still have the larger list. Presumably the lists would be useful for different purposes.
505:
357:
333:
1624:
1546:
FIFA is listing Yugoslavia as predecessor team of Serbia, thus all Yugoslav players are by associaton players of the predecessor team of nowadays Serbia.
485:
Well, it is not wrong in a sense that they all played for the same Federation, it is just that the federation changed name troughout time being th current
218:
1318:
Another aspect is that Joy is challenging the fact that Serbia is the sole official successor of Yugoslavia. Here are the offcial sources confirming it:
140:
1307:
was renamed to Serbia and Montenegro national team. And, finally, in 2006 Montenegrin players left the national team and formed their own one, and the
504:
shouldn't pretend they were and not force their names to appear under the contentious new name. My fair suggestion stands - there should be a separate
1639:
772:
323:
1629:
1619:
1609:
1577:
1555:
1537:
1510:
1482:
1455:
1432:
1413:
1394:
1276:
1243:
1209:
1171:
1136:
1097:
1054:
1025:
949:
919:
896:
863:
844:
815:
784:
766:
751:
717:
687:
641:
622:
599:
572:
543:
517:
498:
480:
465:
450:
423:
407:
387:
373:
130:
1260:
Is the inclusion of predecessor teams here the best possible course of action here given the existence of articles about football in Yugoslavia?
1644:
299:
197:
and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
1634:
1113:
The road you're proposing inevitably leads to tagging all of those players and teams as "Serbia", which has actually been tried recently by
1614:
106:
1604:
189:
163:
610:
534:
for exemple. I even thought in some future to make the Yugo list with statistics and such data, but I still didn´t found time for it.
1075:, however this is a well known fact in the region (it was disputed by Croatia but rejected by the ruling bodies). We can see in the
1304:
1285:- I knew sooner or later you were coming for it. First you tried at talk but you failed to get support, then you created a parallel
1124:
1072:
531:
382:
290:
251:
97:
58:
33:
1289:
by copy/pasting this list and excluding the players that played after 1992, and now we will finally discuss it and settle it.
989:
936:
It doesn't occur to you that few people actually care enough about the discussion to participate? :) I answered Rich, and he
1232:
1255:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1591:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1312:
1068:
978:
1521:
1517:
1193:
1189:
937:
658:
Joy, sorry I had some off-wiki issues and I was completely abscent for weeks, so that is why I didn´t answered to you.
282:
1524:. FIFA is not listing these players under "Serbia predecessor team", it's listing them under "Yugoslavia", with the
1267:. I'm hoping that after many years, third time's the charm - to at least get someone else to voice an opinion. :) --
1263:
The previous discussions failed to attract the attention of anyone other than myself and the article primary author
1196:. FIFA is not listing these players under "Serbia predecessor team", it's listing them under "Yugoslavia", with the
826:
566:
434:
1009:
same rationale - it was their predecessor team, too. This would be against common sense and the instructions at
39:
1335:." The entire article explains well all. We can also see how UEFA includes Yugoslav results as well in the
414:
lists all players with international caps, which is the point of this list. Anyway, what is that you sugest?
1336:
629:
586:
1525:
1197:
1528:. I wrote this almost three years ago, and nobody has put forward a coherent argument to explain this. --
879:
1118:
998:
298:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
105:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1374:
1551:
1478:
1428:
1390:
1340:
1167:
1093:
1050:
915:
840:
823:
780:
775:? Will this fix the ambiguity to which you refered earlier about the title? Any other suggestions?
762:
747:
683:
618:
563:
539:
494:
461:
419:
295:
1423:
with soft wording in this RfC if you clearly expressed your intentions in the previous discussions.
1010:
360:, then we can and should create a normal article called like that. Otherwise Serbia's role is given
1381:
Football websites just follow the FIFA and UEFA decition and so should we. We should not engage in
806:
and made the content of both articles consistent with the rest of the relevant related articles. --
582:
441:
etc, so I still think it's wrong to list Yugoslav football information under a Serbian title. --
361:
1322:
1081:
874:
Oh, and of all the dickish moves I've seen, your behavior here just trumped them all. You did
742:
Technically you are not correct as "after 1992" was still not "Serbia" but "FR Yugoslavia"...
1377:
the national team website, that lists them all together from 1919 till nowadays just as well.
1229:
There's no clear consensus on whether predecessor teams should be included in this article.
1114:
178:
157:
1401:
1547:
1506:
1474:
1424:
1386:
1264:
1163:
1157:
are fundamental, and the list complies with the fact that all this players played for one
1089:
1046:
985:
911:
836:
776:
758:
743:
679:
614:
535:
490:
457:
415:
1382:
193:, a collaborative effort to improve the Knowledge (XXG) coverage of articles related to
1328:
1303:
Macedonian players left the Yugoslav national team and formed their own ones. In 2003
73:
52:
1598:
1573:
1533:
1451:
1409:
1272:
1239:
1205:
1132:
1021:
945:
892:
859:
811:
771:
OK, I made an effort to adress your concerns: how about renaming this article into -
713:
637:
595:
513:
476:
446:
403:
369:
89:
1001:, and we can't magically separate the national team from the country it represents.
1346:
1106:
I'm not claiming new duplication - it existed before, it just wasn't as apparent.
1339:, and again all confirmed that they treat all as one same national team at the
1127:), and reverted on the spot not just by myself but by other editors as well. --
606:
1502:
272:
194:
79:
393:
List of Yugoslavia born footballers who have played for other national teams
1363:
632:
and this situation today, it's not hard to reach an opposite conclusion. --
1368:
1188:
Where exactly does FIFA say that in the context of this list? It doesn't.
1569:
1529:
1447:
1405:
1385:
neither support the POV of Croatia which had its objections turned down.
1268:
1201:
1128:
1017:
941:
888:
855:
807:
709:
633:
591:
509:
472:
442:
399:
378:
For the .yu topic, we actually have a decent amount of articles already:
365:
276:
266:
245:
1499:
List of Serbia international footballers (including predecessor teams)
971:
List of Serbia international footballers (including predecessor teams)
185:
List of Serbia international footballers (including predecessor teams)
102:
1299:
1295:
1076:
1041:
1037:
773:
List of international footballers of Serbia and its predecessors
15:
364:, because Yugoslavia was not succeeded only by Serbia. --
997:
does not have a sole official successor since 1991, see
875:
821:...and you did it on your own ignoring the opinion of
977:
by listing all the players who ever played under the
988:
is apparently that because FIFA/UEFA think that the
294:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
585:. I went looking for the exact UEFA POV, and found
1200:. I fail to see how you can misinterpret that. --
1516:FIFA says on their own very website simply that
439:United Nations Security Council Resolution 777
1347:Serbian Football Association official website
8:
1495:List of Yugoslavia international footballers
1309:Serbia and Montenegro national football team
1287:List of Yugoslavia international footballers
1034:List of Yugoslavia international footballers
975:List of Yugoslavia international footballers
964:List of Yugoslavia international footballers
804:list of Yugoslavia international footballers
506:list of Yugoslavia international footballers
358:list of Yugoslavia international footballers
1011:Knowledge (XXG):Merging#Reasons for merger
522:OK, but we have two different issues here:
240:
152:
47:
21:
19:
1331:: starts the page for Serbia by saying "
1005:denominator is Yugoslavia, not Serbia.
388:Yugoslavia national football team games
242:
154:
49:
1071:is the sole official successor of the
203:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Yugoslavia
1473:your problem exactly with this list?
7:
1251:The following discussion is closed.
1222:RfC on "including predecessor teams"
308:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Football
288:This article is within the scope of
95:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
1625:Low-importance Yugoslavia articles
1518:Ivica Horvat played for Yugoslavia
1190:Ivica Horvat played for Yugoslavia
115:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Serbia
14:
1305:Yugoslavia national football team
1073:Yugoslavia national football team
383:Yugoslavia national football team
1640:Low-importance football articles
1587:The discussion above is closed.
275:
265:
244:
177:
156:
82:
72:
51:
20:
1630:WikiProject Yugoslavia articles
878:, which is a baseless claim of
328:This article has been rated as
223:This article has been rated as
206:Template:WikiProject Yugoslavia
135:This article has been rated as
1620:List-Class Yugoslavia articles
1610:Low-importance Serbia articles
990:Football Association of Serbia
613:also lists players like that.
1:
1645:WikiProject Football articles
1371:they dont include Yugoslavia.
1313:Serbia national football team
1069:Serbia national football team
979:Yugoslav Football Association
973:duplicate the content of the
876:"Rv change without consensus"
718:10:14, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
688:06:42, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
587:current Serbia member profile
351:"including predecessor teams"
311:Template:WikiProject Football
302:and see a list of open tasks.
109:and see a list of open tasks.
1635:List-Class football articles
1578:11:32, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
1556:23:38, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
1538:22:23, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
1511:13:43, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
1483:14:31, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
1456:09:12, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
1433:21:57, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
1414:16:19, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
1395:08:03, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
1277:20:11, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
802:In conclusion, I've created
642:07:44, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
623:23:50, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
600:22:05, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
573:20:49, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
544:01:32, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
518:22:36, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
499:21:57, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
481:21:47, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
466:20:21, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
451:19:42, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
424:19:04, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
408:16:22, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
374:13:59, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
1615:WikiProject Serbia articles
283:Association football portal
118:Template:WikiProject Serbia
1661:
1605:List-Class Serbia articles
1364:Serbia at EU-football.info
1244:13:35, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
816:09:12, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
334:project's importance scale
229:project's importance scale
141:project's importance scale
435:dissolution of Yugoslavia
327:
260:
222:
172:
134:
67:
46:
1589:Please do not modify it.
1522:As did Vladimir Durković
1253:Please do not modify it.
1210:09:35, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
1194:As did Vladimir Durković
1172:19:30, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
1137:19:00, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
1098:18:55, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
1055:18:38, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
1026:10:45, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
950:19:11, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
920:18:25, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
897:10:20, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
864:10:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
845:01:24, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
785:03:32, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
767:03:26, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
752:03:19, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
1501:. See FIFA and UEFA.--
1402:assumption of bad faith
1059:Also, Joy describes as
187:is within the scope of
1526:Flag of SFR Yugoslavia
1198:Flag of SFR Yugoslavia
190:WikiProject Yugoslavia
28:This article is rated
1329:UEFA official website
1323:FIFA official website
999:breakup of Yugoslavia
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
296:Association football
291:WikiProject Football
1497:should redirect to
437:did happen, as did
209:Yugoslavia articles
1254:
984:The contention of
98:WikiProject Serbia
34:content assessment
1375:reprezentacija.rs
1252:
1236:
1233:non-admin closure
1155:intricate details
962:Duplication with
672:They are all here
576:
348:
347:
344:
343:
340:
339:
314:football articles
239:
238:
235:
234:
151:
150:
147:
146:
1652:
1230:
607:EU-Football.info
571:
316:
315:
312:
309:
306:
285:
280:
279:
269:
262:
261:
256:
248:
241:
211:
210:
207:
204:
201:
181:
174:
173:
168:
160:
153:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
85:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
23:
16:
1660:
1659:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1349:we can read: "
1311:was renamed to
1265:User:FkpCascais
1257:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1224:
986:User:FkpCascais
967:
353:
313:
310:
307:
304:
303:
281:
274:
254:
208:
205:
202:
199:
198:
166:
121:Serbia articles
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
83:
81:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
1658:
1656:
1648:
1647:
1642:
1637:
1632:
1627:
1622:
1617:
1612:
1607:
1597:
1596:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1541:
1540:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1417:
1416:
1379:
1378:
1372:
1356:
1355:
1344:
1326:
1291:
1290:
1258:
1249:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1223:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1111:
1107:
1101:
1100:
1085:
1067:the fact that
1057:
966:
960:
959:
958:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
927:
926:
925:
924:
923:
922:
902:
901:
900:
899:
869:
868:
867:
866:
848:
847:
832:
831:
800:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
754:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
697:
696:
695:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
664:Who is with us
659:
649:
648:
647:
646:
645:
644:
630:events of 1929
577:
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
527:
523:
427:
426:
396:
395:
390:
385:
352:
349:
346:
345:
342:
341:
338:
337:
330:Low-importance
326:
320:
319:
317:
300:the discussion
287:
286:
270:
258:
257:
255:Low‑importance
249:
237:
236:
233:
232:
225:Low-importance
221:
215:
214:
212:
182:
170:
169:
167:Low‑importance
161:
149:
148:
145:
144:
137:Low-importance
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
62:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1657:
1646:
1643:
1641:
1638:
1636:
1633:
1631:
1628:
1626:
1623:
1621:
1618:
1616:
1613:
1611:
1608:
1606:
1603:
1602:
1600:
1590:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1376:
1373:
1370:
1365:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1353:
1348:
1345:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1327:
1324:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1316:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1301:
1297:
1288:
1284:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1261:
1256:
1245:
1242:
1241:
1234:
1221:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1123:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1086:
1083:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1014:
1012:
1006:
1002:
1000:
996:
991:
987:
982:
980:
976:
972:
965:
961:
951:
947:
943:
939:
938:stayed silent
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
930:
929:
928:
921:
917:
913:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
898:
894:
890:
885:
881:
877:
873:
872:
871:
870:
865:
861:
857:
852:
851:
850:
849:
846:
842:
838:
834:
833:
829:
828:
825:
820:
819:
818:
817:
813:
809:
805:
786:
782:
778:
774:
770:
769:
768:
764:
760:
755:
753:
749:
745:
741:
740:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
719:
715:
711:
707:
706:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
660:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
643:
639:
635:
631:
626:
625:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
603:
602:
601:
597:
593:
588:
584:
580:
579:
578:
574:
569:
568:
565:
545:
541:
537:
533:
528:
524:
521:
520:
519:
515:
511:
507:
502:
501:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
483:
482:
478:
474:
469:
468:
467:
463:
459:
454:
453:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
431:
430:
429:
428:
425:
421:
417:
412:
411:
410:
409:
405:
401:
394:
391:
389:
386:
384:
381:
380:
379:
376:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
350:
335:
331:
325:
322:
321:
318:
301:
297:
293:
292:
284:
278:
273:
271:
268:
264:
263:
259:
253:
250:
247:
243:
230:
226:
220:
217:
216:
213:
196:
192:
191:
186:
183:
180:
176:
175:
171:
165:
162:
159:
155:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
90:Serbia portal
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
18:
17:
1588:
1493:
1380:
1369:Croatia page
1357:
1350:
1341:Profile page
1332:
1317:
1292:
1282:
1262:
1259:
1250:
1238:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1121:
1080:please see:
1064:
1060:
1015:
1007:
1003:
994:
983:
968:
883:
880:WP:CONSENSUS
822:
801:
675:
671:
667:
663:
562:
560:
486:
397:
377:
362:undue weight
354:
329:
289:
224:
188:
184:
136:
96:
40:WikiProjects
1503:John, AF4JM
1337:Honors page
1153:that these
1115:Lukabeograd
830:and myself.
605:matter, as
1599:Categories
1548:FkpCascais
1475:FkpCascais
1425:FkpCascais
1387:FkpCascais
1164:FkpCascais
1090:FkpCascais
1063:and being
1061:my opinion
1047:FkpCascais
912:FkpCascais
837:FkpCascais
827:Farmbrough
777:FkpCascais
759:FkpCascais
744:FkpCascais
680:FkpCascais
615:FkpCascais
611:Serbian FA
567:Farmbrough
536:FkpCascais
491:FkpCascais
458:FkpCascais
416:FkpCascais
200:Yugoslavia
195:Yugoslavia
164:Yugoslavia
30:List-class
668:Tu su svi
1125:contribs
1110:country.
1082:fifa.com
583:WP:MERGE
305:Football
252:Football
1283:Comment
995:country
969:Should
884:another
676:History
532:Yugo NT
332:on the
227:on the
139:on the
487:Serbia
112:Serbia
103:Serbia
59:Serbia
36:scale.
1383:WP:OR
1574:talk
1570:Joy
1552:talk
1534:talk
1530:Joy
1507:talk
1479:talk
1452:talk
1448:Joy
1429:talk
1410:talk
1406:Joy
1391:talk
1300:UEFA
1298:and
1296:FIFA
1273:talk
1269:Joy
1206:talk
1202:Joy
1168:talk
1159:same
1133:talk
1129:Joy
1119:talk
1094:talk
1077:FIFA
1065:moot
1051:talk
1042:UEFA
1040:and
1038:FIFA
1022:talk
1018:Joy
946:talk
942:Joy
916:talk
893:talk
889:Joy
860:talk
856:Joy
841:talk
824:Rich
812:talk
808:Joy
781:talk
763:talk
748:talk
714:talk
710:Joy
684:talk
670:" ("
638:talk
634:Joy
619:talk
596:talk
592:Joy
564:Rich
540:talk
514:talk
510:Joy
508:. --
495:talk
477:talk
473:Joy
462:talk
447:talk
443:Joy
420:talk
404:talk
400:Joy
370:talk
366:Joy
1352:was
1240:Rob
324:Low
219:Low
131:Low
1601::
1576:)
1554:)
1536:)
1520:.
1509:)
1481:)
1454:)
1431:)
1412:)
1393:)
1354:."
1275:)
1237:~
1208:)
1192:.
1170:)
1151:is
1135:)
1096:)
1053:)
1024:)
1016:--
1013:.
981:?
948:)
918:)
895:)
887:--
862:)
854:--
843:)
814:)
783:)
765:)
750:)
716:)
686:)
640:)
621:)
598:)
570:,
542:)
516:)
497:)
479:)
464:)
449:)
422:)
406:)
398:--
372:)
1572:(
1550:(
1532:(
1505:(
1477:(
1450:(
1427:(
1408:(
1389:(
1343:.
1271:(
1235:)
1231:(
1204:(
1166:(
1131:(
1122:·
1117:(
1092:(
1084:.
1049:(
1020:(
944:(
914:(
891:(
858:(
839:(
810:(
779:(
761:(
746:(
712:(
682:(
636:(
617:(
594:(
575:.
538:(
512:(
493:(
475:(
460:(
445:(
418:(
402:(
368:(
336:.
231:.
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.