Talk:List of bus routes in Metro Vancouver/Archive 1

832:. So far, most of the new shuttle route since then do not have Cxx number (for instance 227, 251, 252, 590). And now I've noticed there are some mentions of bus type in the pamphlet about bus service changes (not the "Evergreen means go" one). so far I cannot find a copy of it online. Under 153 and 157 it says "Uses a Community Shuttle bus" (although peak period in 157 is conventional)... Under 180 it says "operates with a 40-foot bus and 15-min frequency during peak period"... Under 188 it says "with larger bus at all time"... and for the rest of the shuttle route " to provide higher capacity bus during peak times and smaller Community Shuttle when less service is required. Make sure to look for the new bus number as opposed to the type of vehicle at their stop." They do eventually have bus type information in the 1308:

maybe have informal sources. I feel like that level of detail, especially if it's not verifiable by others, belongs in a different venue, kinda like how I think some TV-related info is so detailed that it belongs more in source devoted to entertainment (IMDb) or fans (say a Wikia wiki). Basically I favour asking: even though we can add this, should we add it? But yeah, I think one way we can improve the quality of the TransLink-related articles here is to be a bit more stringent on sourcing. Like I said, I don't think it's productive to start going through and ripping out huge chunks of articles but maybe doing some

987:

downtown and Stanley Park on weekends are only served with conventional buses; most of the 4 & 7 are not trolley during construction on Powell a couple of years ago; 5 & 6 does not use trolley on days with special event; the 555 sometimes use conventional bus to provide more capacity; the 601 now uses articulated buses on some trips to carry more shopper to/from Tsawwassen Mills... Right now, TransLink only seems to maintain 2 distinctive brands - B-Lines and Nightbuses. I think it is a good idea for the article to follow that, and everything else about bus assignment should go to the note section.

213:"* Trip continues to Vancouver before Skytrain extended to Surrey." Is a reference to the previous one (discontinued early 90s, around when Skytrain was extended past Scott Road.) I remember taking it to Scott Road station, and am 90% sure that the other terminus was Fleetwood (Fraser Hwy at 156th or 160th). Prior to the Skytrain, the 330 did continue on from Guildford to Vancouver. After Skytrain and before the Skytain to extension to Surrey - I don't remember if it was still running to/from Vancouver, or to New West Station instead. 422:

onwards, at Kootenay Loop, Willingdon, Brentwood, Lougheed Mall; from there the 151 continued along Lougheed with the next stop at Essondale, then went in as a local to "the back way" (the old Mary Hill Bypass) to Shaughnessy; after a while the 151 was run along Brunette Highway as a local; the 152 screwed around on the Coquitlam Plateau for a while, can't remember how it got to Shaughnessy; I swear after various route adjustments it used to go in a virtual circle around the community centre complex and was a

31: 141:

too many routes out there that do weird short runs like that on a regular basis (ie. some #10 buses end at 63rd, some #20 buses end at 54th, some #410 buses end at Richmond Centre, some #407 buses end at Richmond Centre, some runs of #98 terminate at Airport Station... just to name a few). Besides, the list is based primarily on the official schedule, and it shows Brentwood and UBC as the main start/endpoints. -→

289: 737:(which I asked last night because I had the same questions as Sweetnhappy, we need to stop making the distinction (at least in the Tri-Cities). Kinda annoying, if you ask me, and it's not lost on me that this "flexibility" conveniently obscures actual service provided to the region. Certainly a single person's "observations" cannot be used to determine what category of service is being provided. 793:

Analyze enough samples for each route and we can figure out which type of bus they intend to put onto which route. Beside these methods, there is no other straightforward way to distinguish the type of bus, and this is the path that TransLink is heading to, as the C numbers will eventually be phased out.

971:

Holy shit snacks this thread is long. I think we should also get rid of the trolleybus routes subsection because I have seen diesels on trolley routes, but only once. Maybe we should put a note on the trolley routes saying "usually served by trolleys" or something like that. Maybe even nix the B-Line

956:

I'm not sure why they were separated. I think it may have made sense in the past, when the C designation actually corresponded more closely to minibus usage. But now it's become less clear and that may also be why TransLink is phasing out the C designation. Maybe they shouldn't be noted any longer

850:

That seems like a good idea to remove the C and just use numbers. The image that the C routes bring to my mind, at least in my opinion, are that they are for old or disabled people due to the fact that they operate those minibuses on them. Honestly hope Richmond follows suit because sometimes the bus

525:

can I ask why you moved the WCE icons to the first position in the list (if there are multiple connections)? of all the various modes of public transport in the Lower Mainland, the WCE is extremely infrequent, only goes one way (based on time of day), and isn't first alphabetically by name... so, I'm

421:

These started out as the "Lougheed FastBus" and their Barnet counterpart was the 160, which is still in operaton. The 151 went all the way to the far end of Prairie Street in PoCo, and up Cedar a ways to a small "ring" up there ("ring" was the new term for a "loop"). They made only stops, from Main

338:

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on

216:

Current route 320: During the Victoria Day long weekend, there are extra "special" runs between Surrey Central and Cloverdale. These buses are labelled "320 Special" or "320 Cloverdale" and run in addition to the regular 320 buses during those three days. I added a note on this but am not sure if the

1261:

But beyond all that, this information is not sourced—like quite a bit of super-specific "down to the coach number" I-would-argue-minutiae-style information in various TransLink articles. I've let that slide for existing info because I think it's rude to just come in and strip people's contributions,

1136:

I've been thinking about this today and I feel the notes are missing some info. On some routes, some stops are only served at certain times (i.e. the eastbound stop on Steveston Highway and Coppersmith Place by Ironwood Plaza isn't served between 14:30 and 18:30 on weekdays). Also, maybe even adding

1030:

I have now completed my update of the entire list and copied it over. This update includes merging the community shuttle and coach routes into conventional routes with additional 'tags' to show which routes use minibuses, articulated 60 ft. buses, and suburban coaches. The only section not updated

541:

I'm also interested in hearing the reasoning behind the change (didn't even notice it at first until I updated my sandbox version and checked the diff). As for the order, I would say it should go Expo, Millennium, Canada, SeaBus, and WCE (first by most used type of transit, then age of given line –

1015:

The B-Lines are high capacity routes with higher frequency service when compared to other express routes (debatable for the 97, but that one is now defunct). They also have an elevated status because of their inclusion on SkyTrain maps (i.e. the platform maps/diagrams) and other maps/diagrams that

865:

So what I'm gathering from the above is that removing the Community Shuttle sub-sections would be the best way to go. I think that using the Notes column to indicate that the given routes do use the Community Shuttle minibuses (as is the case for some routes currently) would be a sufficient way to

140:

That's still not a very high number (actually, it's even lower than my estimates). If it was something like 25%, then it might be significant. But if you're going to use a number like that, it deserves a tiny mention in the "notes" section but not anything more than that, I think, because there are

116:

Actually I did the math and 6.5% of weekday 25 trips eastbound terminate at Nanaimo Station. 3.84% of Saturday Trips terminate at Nanaimo station and 2.2% of Sunday/Holiday trips terminate at Nanaimo station. Overall, 5.93% of all trips every week terminate there. It's not one of those destinations

986:

I support getting rid of trolleybus and express bus section too if we're going to remove the community shuttle section. It is actually more common for TransLink to substitute a trolley or express bus with regular bus, as it share the same driver pool. For instance, the summer-only 19 trips between

604:

I favour SkyTrain, SeaBus, WCE. For SkyTrain order, I'm fine with either by age or alphabetical. The benefit of going alpha by SkyTrain line with that approach is that then the icons in total are alpha by name: Canada, Expo, Millennium, SeaBus, WCE. But I don't mind going chrono: Expo, Millennium,

401:

In adding the "Main St to Kootenay Loop" explanation for the Hastings Express, it occurred to me to look for the 9 Broadway Express, which isn't in the list yet. Unlike its Hastings counterpart, it stopped at all major streets but I can't remember what its range was - Commercial to Granville? or

169:

I've noticed that the destination sign on the newer bus now display not only the destination, but also an intermediate point on the route (for example, 152 Lougheed Station via Mariner; C28 Port Moody Station Via Noon's Creek). Should we add this info to the route name, in the note area, or ignore

1307:

I didn't meant to suggest you were insisting we add it without sourcing. And it's not you, in particular: I just edit a fair number of transit-related articles (for TransLink and the TTC mainly) and often the very detailed info is provided without sourcing, I assume by insiders or aficionados who

675:

In my updates of the routes, I have been using the route maps provided by TransLink to determine whether a route is a conventional vs. community shuttle route. However it seems that an anonymous editor has reversed some of my updates without providing a source. Is there a solid source out there

792:

and analyze it at the bus assignment level. For instance, if a 153 is going to change to 186 at Coquitlam Station and then change to every other shuttle route in the region, then its obviously a shuttle. If a 183 becomes a 701 at the end of the trip, then it would have to be a conventional bus.

556:

When I was adding the Millennium Line icons to Coquitlam Central, I thought it looked better to place to West Coast Express icon ahead of the Millennium Line. To keep things consistent, I changed the order for the Waterfront connections. My only argument to keep it there is that the West Coast

741:

provides a collection of all the recent articles they've done on the service changes in the Tri-Cities, and should list all the existing Cnn routes converted to regular NNN routes... of course, it won't necessarily clear up which of the new NNN routes might be serviced by community shuttles

1292:

Fine. We won't add it in. I just thought that it would be nice if we included it in the article. But yes, you do have a valid argument that it is not sourced, and I am not disputing it. I never said that "We are definitely going to add it in, regardless if it follows proper Knowledge (XXG)

1177:

The second reason would be it was running extremely late, and phoned control (T-Comm) about it, and they told the driver to skip some stops or areas where the 401 would normally go to make up time therefore justifying the express sign being displayed. This does happen, but it's rare.

771:

There are many sites and apps that uses TransLink's APIs that tell you exactly which bus is assigned to which route on which day at which time. Even TransLink's own next bus site tells you that. You'll just have to know which bus number corresponds to which type of bus. For example,

1078:

Yeah, I added that. Please refer to the legend at the bottom of the Routes by Region section which says 'Operates mostly or always with 60 ft. articulated buses.' I see that other tags have been added too (and I corrected the legend descriptions to also use similar wording).

1229:

For others who are unaware of previous actions on this page, the reason I added garage info on the page is I feel it is crucial info for those that are studying transportation in Metro Vancouver, or are just curious and want to learn more about the transportation in Metro

605:

Canada. The only hill I would die on (LOL) is that I don't think WCE should be first. Although I appreciate the service covers a more extensive area, it's too limited in frequency and number of users served to give that kind of prominence (in my opinion, of course). —

756:

I honestly agree with that. Community Shuttle routes are just regular bus routes, usually shorter, usually operated with minibuses. I saw a C92 operating with a regular bus, the kind that the 84 operates with, at Bridgeport station when I was waiting for the bus.

557:

Express serves two regional districts and not one like the other modes of transit. That said, I would agree that the West Coast Express is not that important compared to other services. There's really no consistency with other articles either. For example, on the

170:

them all together? I have update the routes in the Coquitlam area and add the info in the note. I think this clear up a bit for routes that have the same destination points (like 151, 152; C27, C28), but maybe too much info for some other route (like C37 and C38)?

1108:

Yeah, I started that and it has been continued by the person who's behind that IPv6 address. Seems to make a bunch of small changes, sometimes breaking ones, without previewing or leaving summaries. He/she has been doing that a lot on a few of the TransLink

972:

subsections because there is nothing special about them other than that they are limited stop express buses that run with the 60 foot articulated buses. The only things bus rapid transit about them are having a partly exclusive right of way and limited stops.

231:

Although it is listed as King George Station / White Rock in the timetable, I have seen 345 buses departing for White Rock from Guildford Exchange. I have not seen, but have also heard of 345 buses arrive at Guildford. Both examples are on weekday mornings.

590:'s order (WCE, Ex, Mi, Ca, SB) or mine (Ex, Mi, Ca, SB, WCE)? Or something else (perhaps Ex, Mi, Ca, WCE, SB)? I'll need an answer for my sandbox version, which will be copied over (not renaming/moving articles) the existing content on the 19th. Thanks! 941:

Seriously?! (sorry, I'm losing track as this discussion is super-long) Okay then why are we even noting routes that use or don't use community shuttles? It seems like it's all up for grabs and that TransLink is just gonna do what it wants to do.

1174:

The first reason (and probably the most probable) would be that it did a route that is an express route, such as the 480 or something like that before turning into the 401, and the driver forgot to get rid of the express sign on the destination

1093:

I was wondering who did that. All I saw was an IPv6 address. I have edited the legend because for one of the descriptors, you used the brand of bus while all the other ones didn't, so I removed the branding for consistency. Hope you don't mind.

564:

My personal preference, I would order SkyTrain lines by age, Expo, Millennium and Canada. For all modes, I would put commuter rail first: West Coast Express, SkyTrain (rail first), SeaBus. If not, I would go with Sweetnhappy's suggestion.

922:

regarding the C92 and I have seen this myself too) so I think it would be inappropriate to include an overall note that contradicts actual vehicle assignments. Or at the very least, the note should read something to the effect of

619:

I was riding the Canada Line on Wednesday, when I looked up at the route diagram and noticed that the icon order for Waterfront was (Expo, SeaBus, WCE). The order should be left as it was, (Expo, Millennium, Canada, SeaBus, WCE).

1249:

is never a good reason to add something. "Crucial" is debatable... we're a general encyclopedia, not Transitopedia; I'm not convinced the preponderance of readers need to know or care what garage a bus comes out of. I

811:—I certainly haven't seen or heard anything about that. But again, this all just makes me think we need to stop making the distinction, because trying to interpret the data like that feels a lot like OR (specifically 1156:

Yesterday around 0600, I was riding the 401 One Road to brighouse on my way to work and passed a 401 Garden City to Riverport Express. Does anyone know anything about it and should we add it to the list?

867: 902:

So for Vancouver non-trolleys: 2, 15, 22, 23, ..., 99, C18, C19, C20 (with a note that the 23 uses shuttles). Maybe an overall note that all Cnn routes are shuttle-only? (that is the case still, right?)

1232:

Another reason why I added garage info is because many other articles that list the bus routes for many cities in North America also state the garage the route runs out of. So why not Vancouver?

335:

is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

526:

confused as to why we'd list those connections first. I would pick Canada Line, Expo Line, Millennium Line, SeaBus, WCE as the order—but if you have a different rationale, feel free to share.

446: 1302: 1241: 1187: 449:

to the "future routes" section, but they are still in evaluation phase... also, the 231 (Lonsdale-Harbourside, replacing the 236 trips as of December 12, 2011) should be put up. Oh,

815:). And I don't see how it's useful to know what vehicles are conventional buses and what are community shuttles, especially if they are going to be swapping them up more and more. — 1112:

Anyway, I don't mind removing the branding – I only had it in there because unlike the other bus types which have mixed/varied manufacturers, the coaches are all made by Orion.

74:

This is kind of pointless, but interesting, but I found an old bus route list from an archive of the BC Transit website from late 1996, thanks to the Wayback Machine. See here:

899:

That's pretty much what I was thinking, so I'm all for it. I would order the sections with the numbered buses first and then the remaining Cnn numbers at the end of the list.

1001:

Might I ask what makes the B-Lines distinct other than partial bus lanes (though that is highly doubtful) and limited stops (which in my opinion do not make them distinct)?

1205:

his edit here. First and foremost, that information is not sourced. Second, it created an error with at least one of the tables. Third, I believe this information is

499:

Arguably, Knowledge (XXG) is nothing BUT an archive; . We also can't list absolutely everything about every single subject - but we make a damn good go of it.

47: 17: 316:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with 313: 235: 833: 340: 332: 328: 305: 1329: 1279: 836:. But since the review is done in every Sept and publish next year, information about these new routes probably won't be released until June 2018. 1063:

in some of the routes notes. I have seen routes that are usually run with articulated buses sometimes run with rigid buses. Should we amend this?

274:

Is it too much information? I think it made the table look more confusing, plus it'll require a lot of work later on to keep the list updated...

1209:. It also clutters an already complicated set of tables and I feel like it should be placed elsewhere if (and only if) consensus is to keep it. 402:

did it go to Alma on the one end and the Renfrew Loop on the other? Used to be a lifesaver in rush hour, though almost as crowded as the 9...

344: 210:"330 Surrey Central Station / Scott Road Station" is the more recent one which was brought in around '96-97ish and lasted for several years. 454: 382: 500: 366:, now it just stops at Scotsdale, does anyone know what happened to the rest of the line? Because that information is not on this page. 426:

of a run, especially after it was fudged with. Not sure when they started making more stops between Brentwood and Lougheed Mall....

324: 296: 86:

Sorry to burst your bubble, but as a transit enthusiast, I can access route lists far older than that. 1988 1987 1984 1973 1949

734: 558: 561:

article, under services on the infobox the order goes: SeaBus, West Coast Express, SkyTrain Expo Line, SkyTrain Canada Line.

1227:

I have spotted the errors you were talking about. If we decide to keep this information, the errors are easily fixable.

247: 788:

shows the routes that uses conventional bus. The way I figured out before the service change is to use download the

1373: 1358: 1221: 1166: 1146: 1121: 1103: 1088: 1072: 1040: 1025: 1010: 996: 981: 966: 951: 936: 918:

But that's not exactly true for all Cnn routes. Some of them do use conventional 40' buses (as mentioned above by

912: 879: 860: 845: 824: 802: 766: 751: 717: 698: 643: 629: 614: 599: 574: 551: 535: 508: 494: 462: 435: 411: 390: 375: 353: 278: 263: 251: 221: 196: 174: 158: 134: 106: 81: 38: 957:

as being separate and any remaining Cnn routes should just be ordered after conventional routes as you suggested.

813:

Analyze enough samples for each route and we can figure out which type of bus they intend to put onto which route.

189: 153: 829: 708:. P.S. If it's not prefixed with a "C" and operated with those minibuses, then it must be a conventional route. 259:

I notice that there isn't a turnaround point at King George, so I guess the just unofficially continues there.

458: 453:

most of the reference links at the bottom of the page don't work; you just end up at a "page not found" page.

386: 364: 75: 1298: 1237: 1183: 705: 504: 1364:

Why do we need them. The contant can be found on the Translink URL. Knowledge (XXG) is not a travel guide.

1347:

These need to be updated every few months; TransLink removes the older documents when they post new ones.

1212:

He's reverted back; I'll be undoing that based on the first two points: unsourced and introduces errors. —

171: 147: 1325: 1275: 1217: 1117: 1084: 1036: 1021: 962: 947: 932: 908: 875: 820: 747: 694: 639: 610: 595: 547: 531: 738: 301: 275: 676:

that can differentiate the routes besides the route maps (that I have been adding as cited sources)?

371: 181: 142: 1266:, but there is no way we are even considering putting this new info in this article without proper, 988: 837: 794: 300:

is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under

1162: 1142: 1099: 1068: 1006: 992: 977: 856: 841: 798: 762: 713: 625: 570: 350: 260: 78: 1350: 1255: 1206: 660:

A solid source for community shuttle vs. conventional routes (particularly in Coq, PoMo, and PoCo)

1294: 1233: 1198: 1179: 809:

and this is the path that TransLink is heading to, as the C numbers will eventually be phased out

490: 431: 407: 1246: 239: 218: 1354: 1369: 1321: 1271: 1254:

believe that little "except every 3rd Tuesday after a full moon"-style notations are HUGELY

1213: 1113: 1080: 1032: 1017: 958: 943: 928: 904: 871: 816: 743: 724: 690: 683:

Routes 153, 157, 173, 174, and 179 are conventional bus routes according to their route maps

670: 635: 606: 591: 581: 543: 527: 367: 243: 118: 90: 1267: 317: 1158: 1138: 1095: 1064: 1002: 973: 919: 852: 789: 758: 728: 709: 666: 621: 587: 566: 520: 1263: 288: 925:

most C labeled routes typically use shuttle minibuses except where noted specifically

486: 427: 403: 381:

The Scottsdale to Newtown segment becomes route 319, and the rest becomes route 341.

851:

I normally take, the 404, has hardly any people on it. Sometimes, I'm the only one.

781: 777: 773: 785: 1365: 1312: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

117:

where only 7 trips a week terminate there. 33 trips out of 556 do every week.

1318:

tagging and asking for good sourcing for new stuff will slowly improve them.

1172:

There would be two reasons why the bus would be displaying an express sign.

1031:

is the Future Routes section. Please feel free to comment on the changes.

706:

http://www.translink.ca/en/Schedules-and-Maps/Transit-Service-Changes.aspx

780:

shows that those routes are shuttle at least for part of the day, while

207:

There have been two discontinued route #330 buses in the past 15 years:

866:

delineate vehicle types/service levels. I'll have an example ready on

363:

340 used to go all the way to Newton Exchange and even Cloverdale

284:

Fair use rationale for Image:TransLink (British Columbia) logo.png

1293:

guidelines, or if the general concensus agrees with it or not."

686:

Route 191 is a community shuttle route according to its route map

312:

Knowledge (XXG) article constitutes fair use. In addition to the

1137:

route length and number of stops would be fun to add. Thoughts?

25: 287: 445:

Should somebody add some of the routes identified in this

1202: 586:

which would you (and anyone else interested) prefer?

343:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 217:wording accurately conveyed what I meant to say. 704:The TransLink website is as solid as it gets. 634:Alright, then that's the order I'll go with. 8: 333:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline 297:Image:TransLink (British Columbia) logo.png 18:Talk:List of bus routes in Metro Vancouver 830:see the comment on May 7, 2013 @ 11:59 am 542:that's why Millennium is before Canada). 812: 808: 203:Former route 330 and Current Route 320 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 7: 807:So first, we would need a source on 1016:contain TransLink's major routes. 468:Deleting former bus routes section 24: 482:Knowledge (XXG) is not an archive 180:Probably too much information. -→ 165:Route name and intermediate point 331:. Using one of the templates at 70:List of routes from 10 years ago 29: 735:the answer to my question here 559:Waterfront station (Vancouver) 345:Media copyright questions page 1: 1374:00:01, 20 December 2017 (UTC) 1122:19:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC) 1104:11:50, 27 December 2016 (UTC) 1089:08:25, 27 December 2016 (UTC) 1073:06:17, 27 December 2016 (UTC) 1041:06:02, 25 December 2016 (UTC) 1026:22:35, 22 December 2016 (UTC) 1011:20:50, 22 December 2016 (UTC) 997:20:27, 22 December 2016 (UTC) 982:08:06, 22 December 2016 (UTC) 967:06:43, 22 December 2016 (UTC) 952:03:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC) 937:03:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC) 913:02:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC) 880:00:49, 22 December 2016 (UTC) 861:20:47, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 846:16:58, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 825:11:00, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 803:09:16, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 767:09:11, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 752:08:44, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 718:08:30, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 699:05:18, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 509:03:32, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 463:02:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 354:19:07, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 314:boilerplate fair use template 279:04:25, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 1330:22:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC) 1303:22:00, 4 December 2017 (UTC) 1280:20:38, 4 December 2017 (UTC) 1242:20:09, 4 December 2017 (UTC) 1222:19:52, 4 December 2017 (UTC) 1194:including garage information 1188:07:46, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 1167:21:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC) 1147:07:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC) 1132:A few things to add to notes 644:20:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC) 630:12:45, 9 December 2016 (UTC) 615:01:23, 9 December 2016 (UTC) 600:01:00, 9 December 2016 (UTC) 575:12:06, 6 December 2016 (UTC) 552:07:03, 5 December 2016 (UTC) 536:06:53, 5 December 2016 (UTC) 341:criteria for speedy deletion 252:10:32, 7 February 2007 (UTC) 222:08:03, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 175:03:57, 3 November 2006 (UTC) 159:09:08, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 135:08:46, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 107:08:02, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 1060:Noticed that someone added 197:04:52, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 82:02:53, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 1390: 1343:Bus schedule and map links 391:23:06, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 376:00:20, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 325:the image description page 264:20:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 1359:17:48, 10 July 2017 (UTC) 479:We can't list all of them 327:and edit it to include a 495:19:13, 9 June 2011 (UTC) 441:North Shore transit plan 436:02:45, 9 June 2009 (UTC) 412:02:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC) 306:explanation or rationale 834:Transit Service Review 292: 1262:even if they are not 514:Connection icon order 308:as to why its use in 291: 238:comment was added by 42:of past discussions. 868:my sandbox version 397:9 Broadway Express 329:fair use rationale 293: 89:are some of them. 679:Inconsistencies: 255: 67: 66: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 1381: 1332: 1317: 1311: 732: 674: 585: 524: 304:but there is no 233: 194: 186: 184:Buchanan-Hermit™ 156: 150: 145: 132: 131: 128: 125: 122: 104: 103: 100: 97: 94: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 1389: 1388: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1345: 1319: 1315: 1309: 1196: 1154: 1134: 733:I think, given 722: 664: 662: 579: 518: 516: 472:Reasons below: 470: 443: 419: 399: 361: 286: 272: 234:—The preceding 229: 205: 190: 182: 167: 154: 148: 144:Buchanan-Hermit 143: 129: 126: 123: 120: 119: 114: 101: 98: 95: 92: 91: 72: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1387: 1385: 1377: 1376: 1344: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1259: 1231: 1228: 1201:wonders why I 1195: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1176: 1173: 1153: 1150: 1133: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1110: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 897: 896: 895: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 882: 688: 687: 684: 661: 658: 657: 656: 655: 654: 653: 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 562: 515: 512: 484: 483: 480: 477: 476:Hard to source 469: 466: 455:173.180.181.29 442: 439: 418: 415: 398: 395: 394: 393: 383:64.180.237.213 360: 357: 351:BetacommandBot 285: 282: 271: 268: 267: 266: 261:Canadianshoper 228: 225: 204: 201: 200: 199: 172:64.180.239.213 166: 163: 162: 161: 113: 110: 79:FlyingPenguins 71: 68: 65: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1386: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1342: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1314: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1260: 1257: 1253: 1248: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1210: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1151: 1149: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1131: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1000: 999: 998: 994: 990: 985: 984: 983: 979: 975: 970: 969: 968: 964: 960: 955: 954: 953: 949: 945: 940: 939: 938: 934: 930: 926: 921: 917: 916: 915: 914: 910: 906: 900: 881: 877: 873: 869: 864: 863: 862: 858: 854: 849: 848: 847: 843: 839: 835: 831: 828: 827: 826: 822: 818: 814: 810: 806: 805: 804: 800: 796: 791: 787: 783: 779: 775: 770: 769: 768: 764: 760: 755: 754: 753: 749: 745: 740: 736: 730: 726: 721: 720: 719: 715: 711: 707: 703: 702: 701: 700: 696: 692: 685: 682: 681: 680: 677: 672: 668: 659: 645: 641: 637: 633: 632: 631: 627: 623: 618: 617: 616: 612: 608: 603: 602: 601: 597: 593: 589: 583: 578: 577: 576: 572: 568: 563: 560: 555: 554: 553: 549: 545: 540: 539: 538: 537: 533: 529: 522: 513: 511: 510: 506: 502: 501:207.6.238.190 497: 496: 492: 488: 481: 478: 475: 474: 473: 467: 465: 464: 460: 456: 452: 448: 440: 438: 437: 433: 429: 425: 416: 414: 413: 409: 405: 396: 392: 388: 384: 380: 379: 378: 377: 373: 369: 365: 358: 356: 355: 352: 348: 347:. Thank you. 346: 342: 336: 334: 330: 326: 323:Please go to 321: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 299: 298: 290: 283: 281: 280: 277: 269: 265: 262: 258: 257: 256: 253: 249: 245: 241: 237: 226: 224: 223: 220: 214: 211: 208: 202: 198: 195: 193: 187: 185: 179: 178: 177: 176: 173: 164: 160: 157: 151: 146: 139: 138: 137: 136: 133: 111: 109: 108: 105: 87: 84: 83: 80: 76: 69: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1349: 1346: 1295:Saltn'Pepper 1251: 1234:Saltn'Pepper 1211: 1199:Saltn'Pepper 1197: 1180:Saltn'Pepper 1155: 1152:401 Express? 1135: 1061: 1059: 924: 901: 898: 742:sometimes. — 689: 678: 663: 517: 498: 485: 471: 450: 444: 423: 420: 400: 362: 349: 337: 322: 309: 295: 294: 276:64.180.9.209 273: 230: 215: 212: 209: 206: 191: 183: 168: 115: 88: 85: 73: 60: 43: 37: 1322:Joeyconnick 1272:Joeyconnick 1270:sourcing. — 1214:Joeyconnick 1114:Sweetnhappy 1081:Sweetnhappy 1033:Sweetnhappy 1018:Sweetnhappy 959:Sweetnhappy 944:Joeyconnick 929:Sweetnhappy 905:Joeyconnick 872:Sweetnhappy 817:Joeyconnick 744:Joeyconnick 725:Sweetnhappy 691:Sweetnhappy 671:Joeyconnick 636:Sweetnhappy 607:Joeyconnick 592:Sweetnhappy 582:Joeyconnick 544:Sweetnhappy 528:Joeyconnick 417:151 and 152 270:Bus stop ID 36:This is an 1264:verifiable 1230:Vancouver. 1252:certainly 1159:Cganuelas 1139:Cganuelas 1096:Cganuelas 1065:Cganuelas 1003:Cganuelas 989:Snowystar 974:Cganuelas 920:Cganuelas 853:Cganuelas 838:Snowystar 795:Snowystar 790:GTFS data 759:Cganuelas 739:This link 729:Cganuelas 710:Cganuelas 667:Cganuelas 622:Northwest 588:Northwest 567:Northwest 521:Northwest 359:Route 340 227:Route 345 61:Archive 1 1268:reliable 1247:WP:OTHER 1203:reverted 428:Skookum1 404:Skookum1 318:fair use 302:fair use 248:contribs 236:unsigned 112:Route 25 1351:MacsBug 1256:trivial 1207:trivial 487:Langdon 39:archive 1366:Ajf773 1109:pages. 870:soon. 1175:sign. 240:Ccg 1 219:Ccg 1 16:< 1370:talk 1355:talk 1326:talk 1299:talk 1276:talk 1238:talk 1218:talk 1184:talk 1163:talk 1143:talk 1118:talk 1100:talk 1085:talk 1069:talk 1037:talk 1022:talk 1007:talk 993:talk 978:talk 963:talk 948:talk 933:talk 909:talk 876:talk 857:talk 842:talk 821:talk 799:talk 786:this 784:and 782:this 778:this 776:and 774:this 763:talk 748:talk 727:and 714:talk 695:talk 669:and 640:talk 626:talk 611:talk 596:talk 571:talk 548:talk 532:talk 505:talk 491:talk 459:talk 447:plan 432:talk 408:talk 387:talk 372:talk 310:this 244:talk 130:cape 102:cape 451:and 424:dog 368:_dk 1372:) 1357:) 1328:) 1316:}} 1313:cn 1310:{{ 1301:) 1278:) 1240:) 1220:) 1186:) 1165:) 1145:) 1120:) 1102:) 1087:) 1071:) 1039:) 1024:) 1009:) 995:) 980:) 965:) 950:) 935:) 927:. 911:) 878:) 859:) 844:) 823:) 801:) 765:) 750:) 716:) 697:) 642:) 628:) 613:) 598:) 573:) 550:) 534:) 507:) 493:) 461:) 434:) 410:) 389:) 374:) 320:. 250:) 246:• 192:?! 155:?! 127:ms 124:or 121:St 99:ms 96:or 93:St 77:-- 1368:( 1353:( 1324:( 1320:— 1297:( 1274:( 1258:. 1236:( 1216:( 1182:( 1178:— 1161:( 1141:( 1116:( 1098:( 1083:( 1067:( 1035:( 1020:( 1005:( 991:( 976:( 961:( 946:( 942:— 931:( 907:( 903:— 874:( 855:( 840:( 819:( 797:( 761:( 746:( 731:: 723:@ 712:( 693:( 673:: 665:@ 638:( 624:( 609:( 594:( 584:: 580:@ 569:( 546:( 530:( 523:: 519:@ 503:( 489:( 457:( 430:( 406:( 385:( 370:( 254:. 242:( 188:/ 152:/ 149:™ 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index