74:
53:
454:
would be nice to know.not anyone who lands a winner film in a festival is a director with artistic twist in the works.absolutely not.most specifically those listed festivals that have for years nothing to do with arts and films with artistic and or even brave perspectives and or unique cinema meits but are only are political sages known to almost everyone in the world.common.this is simply banal..
164:
146:
260:
242:
22:
174:
270:
720:, and lots of other films (most films which received this title, actually) that are clearly the very opposite of art films. He (and a great many others listed here) is widely seen as a director of exploitation/action commerical/entertainment mainstream Hollywood movies by serious academic scholars of film. Refs available upon request.--
391:
many names are not even in the list and many are there fOR NO reason: i do not like to comment on those who are listed, but where is TATI, Keaton, hitchcock,.................. parajanov---------- and many more. who gives you these names. how do you get your listings please. is this political? i just
453:
there are so many names that need to be listed as art film associated directors but here i see names that are in no way an art film related directors....akin,majidi,ghobadi,and....certainly not when you have names such as kubrick,uzo,tati,....tarkowski...? who and how do you get this list?please, it
543:
article and any simple google scholar search or library search would find academics and critics who would label both as art film, art house or independent directors (these terms are used interchangeably of course). So far, another editor and myself are of the opinion that both names belong. When I
544:
have some more time I'll be happy to list some sources on this talk page confirming the appropriateness of those two names being mentioned, although as I said, it would be easy for anyone to find this info. Hopefully, the IP editor will choose not to edit war over this.
508:
With some of the recent removals (some of which I agree with), I think there is very high need for examples and better references in the text. I'll try to provide some of the references, and would like to hear more opinions if examples should be listed.
587:
I must agree with you, although I haven't seen all of his films, since he is not exactly my cup of tea. Another good thing (and already suggested) would be to make a one column list, but with examples (like in this page I created some time ago:
607:
I think he should be here. For example, In 2013, Pulp
Fiction was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant".
364:
are these names mentioned as well?there are some most incredible artists making films uniquely apart from a whole rest of many in the list,even though the list does include some world important directors. —
421:
agrreably with the list lacking many greates names in art film history of cinema. so many names here do not even fit independent filmmaking process, let alone art films? majidi, akin,.............
330:
i would strongly suggest the name of
Daryush Shokof be added to the list. his work includes some of the cinema,s most original, truly artistic oriented and widely influential in all cinema history.
592:), since many of the directors in question worked in both commercial and art cinema and somebody might delete them based on non-art part of their career.
810:
805:
292:
128:
539:
issues insists on removing these two names, claiming in his opinion that they are not art film directors. Both directors are mentioned in the
785:
118:
461:
444:
345:
338:
would you please, make shokof,s name clickable. he is listed, and definitely amongst the top of such a list, in my opinion. thank you.
790:
402:
800:
757:
721:
372:
795:
780:
428:
283:
247:
94:
192:
496:
204:
196:
33:
90:
86:
81:
58:
200:
187:
151:
597:
448:
465:
349:
406:
765:
761:
749:
729:
725:
617:
601:
581:
562:
518:
500:
469:
410:
380:
353:
740:
Do You think he is art film director ? I dont think so. It seems he did mainly
Exploitation and b-movies. (
432:
625:
552:
376:
39:
492:
484:
457:
440:
424:
398:
368:
341:
593:
514:
741:
609:
572:
I strongly suggest to remove
Quentin Tarantino. No top critic would define his features art movie
488:
291:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
577:
275:
745:
613:
545:
529:
510:
774:
573:
536:
476:
Alphabetical - single column and maybe one or two films that clearly are "art film".
589:
191:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can
624:
This hardly means it is an art film. Some other films that received same title (
525:
288:
179:
265:
169:
163:
145:
73:
52:
259:
241:
540:
208:
269:
756:
Me neither (and the same goes for most directors listed here).--
15:
93:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
590:
https://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_gothic_fiction_works
287:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
207:. To improve this article, please refer to the
8:
85:, an attempt to structure and organize all
236:
203:. To use this banner, please refer to the
140:
47:
21:
19:
480:That would make the list more concrete.
89:. If you wish to help, please visit the
238:
142:
49:
7:
281:This article is within the scope of
185:This article is within the scope of
79:This article is within the scope of
387:many names are not even in the list
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
301:Knowledge:WikiProject Visual arts
811:WikiProject Visual arts articles
304:Template:WikiProject Visual arts
268:
258:
240:
201:regional and topical task forces
172:
162:
144:
72:
51:
20:
806:List-Class visual arts articles
451:) 20:01, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
435:) 20:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
123:This article has been rated as
354:13:22, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
1:
519:13:13, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
411:11:51, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
295:and see a list of open tasks.
786:Low-importance List articles
626:National Film Registry#Films
381:17:15, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
103:Knowledge:WikiProject Lists
827:
791:WikiProject Lists articles
710:E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial
563:20:30, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
470:11:47, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
217:Knowledge:WikiProject Film
129:project's importance scale
106:Template:WikiProject Lists
801:WikiProject Film articles
766:15:28, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
750:22:04, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
730:15:36, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
618:21:48, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
602:15:04, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
582:10:45, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
253:
220:Template:WikiProject Film
157:
122:
67:
46:
796:List-Class film articles
781:List-Class List articles
690:The Silence of the Lambs
658:The Shawshank Redemption
501:09:18, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
706:Raiders of the Lost Ark
535:An IP editor with some
284:WikiProject Visual arts
87:list pages on Knowledge
28:This article is rated
678:Beauty and the Beast
307:visual arts articles
638:Saving Private Ryan
437:absolutely RIGHT.
392:do not understand.
193:join the discussion
360:shokof+kitano+tati
276:Visual arts portal
34:content assessment
718:L.A. Confidential
504:
487:comment added by
460:comment added by
443:comment added by
427:comment added by
401:comment added by
371:comment added by
344:comment added by
323:
322:
319:
318:
315:
314:
235:
234:
231:
230:
195:and see lists of
139:
138:
135:
134:
82:WikiProject Lists
818:
714:Schindler's List
634:The Big Lebowski
559:
556:
549:
503:
481:
472:
452:
436:
413:
383:
356:
309:
308:
305:
302:
299:
278:
273:
272:
262:
255:
254:
244:
237:
225:
224:
221:
218:
215:
188:WikiProject Film
182:
177:
176:
175:
166:
159:
158:
148:
141:
111:
110:
107:
104:
101:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
23:
16:
826:
825:
821:
820:
819:
817:
816:
815:
771:
770:
738:
570:
557:
554:
547:
533:
482:
478:
455:
438:
422:
419:
396:
389:
366:
362:
339:
336:
328:
306:
303:
300:
297:
296:
274:
267:
222:
219:
216:
213:
212:
178:
173:
171:
108:
105:
102:
99:
98:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
824:
822:
814:
813:
808:
803:
798:
793:
788:
783:
773:
772:
769:
768:
737:
734:
733:
732:
605:
604:
594:HeadlessMaster
569:
566:
532:
523:
522:
521:
477:
474:
462:87.160.230.146
445:213.160.23.146
418:
415:
388:
385:
361:
358:
346:213.196.208.87
335:
332:
327:
324:
321:
320:
317:
316:
313:
312:
310:
293:the discussion
280:
279:
263:
251:
250:
245:
233:
232:
229:
228:
226:
184:
183:
167:
155:
154:
149:
137:
136:
133:
132:
125:Low-importance
121:
115:
114:
112:
77:
65:
64:
62:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
823:
812:
809:
807:
804:
802:
799:
797:
794:
792:
789:
787:
784:
782:
779:
778:
776:
767:
763:
759:
755:
754:
753:
751:
747:
743:
736:Tinto Brass ?
735:
731:
727:
723:
719:
715:
711:
707:
703:
699:
695:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
671:
667:
666:Jurassic Park
663:
659:
655:
654:The Lion King
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
627:
623:
622:
621:
619:
615:
611:
603:
599:
595:
591:
586:
585:
584:
583:
579:
575:
567:
565:
564:
561:
560:
551:
550:
542:
538:
531:
527:
524:
520:
516:
512:
507:
506:
505:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
475:
473:
471:
467:
463:
459:
450:
446:
442:
434:
430:
426:
416:
414:
412:
408:
404:
403:87.187.194.22
400:
393:
386:
384:
382:
378:
374:
370:
359:
357:
355:
351:
347:
343:
333:
331:
325:
311:
294:
290:
286:
285:
277:
271:
266:
264:
261:
257:
256:
252:
249:
246:
243:
239:
227:
223:film articles
210:
206:
205:documentation
202:
198:
194:
190:
189:
181:
170:
168:
165:
161:
160:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
130:
126:
120:
117:
116:
113:
109:List articles
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
18:
17:
758:87.71.44.208
739:
722:87.71.44.208
717:
713:
709:
705:
701:
697:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
661:
657:
653:
650:Forrest Gump
649:
645:
641:
637:
633:
629:
606:
571:
553:
548:freshacconci
546:
534:
479:
420:
394:
390:
373:81.74.56.208
363:
337:
329:
282:
186:
124:
91:project page
80:
40:WikiProjects
686:Dirty Harry
530:Luis Buñuel
526:David Lynch
483:—Preceding
456:—Preceding
439:—Preceding
429:87.158.13.7
423:—Preceding
397:—Preceding
395:thank you
367:—Preceding
340:—Preceding
298:Visual arts
289:visual arts
248:Visual arts
180:Film portal
775:Categories
630:The Matrix
568:Tarantino?
537:ownership
209:guidelines
197:open tasks
95:discussion
30:List-class
682:Airplane!
674:Star Wars
646:Toy Story
511:StjepanHR
694:Die Hard
574:Grieverk
541:art film
497:contribs
485:unsigned
458:unsigned
441:unsigned
425:unsigned
399:unsigned
369:unsigned
342:unsigned
326:Untitled
742:Jkrn111
702:Top Gun
698:Tootsie
642:Titanic
610:Jkrn111
489:Hannesb
417:i agree
127:on the
334:shokof
36:scale.
662:Rocky
558:to me
100:Lists
59:Lists
762:talk
746:talk
726:talk
670:Jaws
614:talk
598:talk
578:talk
555:talk
528:and
515:talk
493:talk
466:talk
449:talk
433:talk
407:talk
377:talk
350:talk
214:Film
199:and
152:Film
752:).
628:):
620:).
119:Low
777::
764:)
748:)
728:)
716:,
712:,
708:,
704:,
700:,
696:,
692:,
688:,
684:,
680:,
676:,
672:,
668:,
664:,
660:,
656:,
652:,
648:,
644:,
640:,
636:,
632:,
616:)
600:)
580:)
517:)
499:)
495:•
468:)
409:)
379:)
352:)
760:(
744:(
724:(
612:(
608:(
596:(
576:(
513:(
491:(
464:(
447:(
431:(
405:(
375:(
348:(
211:.
131:.
97:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
