479:(one of my all time faves BTW - I enjoy getting to see Bruce Dern as the good guy for once - he was used as a villain so often in that era) so I don't know what the authors wrote or the context that they might have used the term in. I most certainly would not insist on removing either film from this list. It wont be the first list or article with misleading info in it since sourcing trumps accuracy per Knowledge (XXG) guidelines (I really do apologize if this reads as an insult - it isn't meant as one - it simply states a fact about WikiP's guidelines) nor will it be the last. I mention it as food for thought and because I couldn't help from picking this nit :-) Cheers and again thanks for you good work.
951:
films featuring dogs, there would be so many films in which dogs appeared in the background and nobody notes them. As for the "Ref." column, it sometimes encourages referencing. In other cases, editors have added a film without one (either they don't care about adding one or expect someone else to add one), or they copy another film's reference tag (by accident or to pretend the reference applies; hard to say). What we could do to explain the criteria is rewrite the lead section's opening sentence to state something like, "films that feature space stations as a distinct/noteworthy setting" (better wording could be used).
280:
924:"List of films in which space stations appear" perhaps? A bit wordy, but more clear and solves the implication of prominence. I agree that "about" would be a bad choice unless the goal really is to limit the list to films where the space station is central to the plot. I only belatedly realized that "featuring" could be construed in the same sense as a "geographical feature"...which is to say they appear but aren't necessarily significant; I don't feel we should assume readers will interpret the word that way.
329:
204:
308:
177:
902:"Featuring" is used pretty broadly here. If we used "about", that would suggest that a space station was the film's main setting. The prominence of a space station is going to vary by degrees, and reliable sources aren't going to judge space stations on an importance scale. Is there a term other than "featuring" to use? Such lists require secondary sources, so these are films where space stations have been worth noting.
99:
81:
50:
339:
214:
109:
21:
1453:
1145:
826:
887:, but I would hardly say they are "featured". If it's just a list of films in which space stations appear I feel the list name should perhaps be updated; if it's a list of films in which space stations play a significant role then I think the list needs to be reviewed and possibly the lead needs to be clarified. Cheers.
564:
where it was decided that, although the book mentions the nuclear platform space stations and that the signal from the monolith on the moon is activated when the sun hits it, neither of these could be mentioned in the plot of the article since they weren't specifically stated onscreen. But if that is
474:
the ship took off from Earth (unseen) and returns to land on it at the end of the film. Now I suspect that you will tell me that as long as the sourcing mentions stations then it is okay to list them here. I see that AO Scott uses the term though I have my doubts that he understands the distinction.
1241:
because I do not find that it warrants inclusion. It is more often called a spaceship than a space station, and space stations are largely identified to have generally static locations in space. Some sources do call it a space station, but it seems to be more of a sloppy label. Maybe we can include
927:
I like that the list has a column for references, strongly implying they're required...but I also note that a couple of (related from the looks of it) entries don't have references right now. The lead should perhaps include a notation that sources should be provided at the time an entry is added in
1047:
You can rename it to List of films about space stations if you are aiming for the prominence. Then you can exclude films that mention a station in passing or for just a few scenes. For example, there might be a comedy where someone could be shouting "Noooo!!!" so loudly that even space station Mir
950:
I have to say that it sounds wordy. The goal of saying "featuring" is to say that a space station is a distinct element in the film, especially to the point that at least an independent party found it worth noting. Space stations are kind of a unique element to pop up in films. If we talked about
1070:
but was not sure if this was too vague. I was also thinking something like "including" but I'm not sure what fits. As for documentaries, I took a quick look in Google, and I'm not sure if there are enough notable items to separate from the table. What we could do instead is have a "Description"
742:
738:
559:
they don't just hang there (well I guess in terms of the model ships that are used they do Heehee) they are always moving. My preference would be that then term actually be used in the film - there is some precedence for this - one of the best examples would be at the talk page for
1048:
hears it. And also any of the Star Trek franchise that isn't Deep Space Nine. Also, any films that involve a real space station, like documentaries, might warrant its own subcategory. The other end of the spectrum is to call it List of films with space stations. -
1115:
The article needs a better introduction to establish notability. What do the sources say about space stations in films? The appropriate name will come from how the sources approach the topic. The
Westfahl 2009 book looks like it has a lot of potential.--
789:
Thanks for providing those. I think you are correct in your assessment. It feels like the author in the first link didn't make the distinction between the two terms but it was an interesting read. I appreciate your taking the time to provide those.
526:, also identified it as a space station. I assume it is because the space freighters just linger in orbit. Maybe what we can do is create a "See also" section, put these two films there, and list the various characterizations? Like
1101:
and one of the definitions is "to appear". So "List of films in which a space station appears" or a variation on that might work. I know it is a bit long and it is only one editors thoughts so I look forward to other suggestions.
1551:
Could I get a feel as for whether editors believe that RT is an appropriate source to justify inclusion on this list? I'm referring to individual film articles, not, say, a list of Top Ten Films With Space
Stations. Thanks!
31:
417:
Hello Erik. My compliments on another fine list that you have created. I do have one quibble. In all my years of learning about space travel both real and imagined space stations are stationary. As it states in the
1679:
1669:
981:
I'd be amenable to rephrasing the lead for clarity, sure. Just to be clear I don't feel especially strongly about this; I'd just like to see the ambiguity in the word "featuring" resolved one way or another.
289:
187:
605:. While the line between space station and spacecraft can be blurred, I do not think we can call the Prometheus a space station. Otherwise we'd count all spacecraft with long-term living. I think the
836:
may qualify as an entry due to its Battle School being a space station. I can't find any clear-cut sources right now, but it is likely that some will emerge closer to the film's release.
395:
643:(1998) film may be considered a space station? - or not? - interestingly, seems planet Earth itself has been regarded a "spaceship" since the planet itself is traveling
1744:
1642:
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not.
385:
514:
MarnetteD, I have thought about these technicalities. I think part of the challenge is that "space station" can be used as a general term. For example, when I Google
270:
1729:
1749:
578:
Maybe a note in a see also section stating that some sources mention the craft in these films as space stations while others do not would help clarify things.
361:
1739:
1724:
1575:
260:
647:
through the universe - however, since the planet Earth is not landing any where (hopefully), maybe it's more a "station" instead? - in any case - Enjoy! :)
1734:
1071:
column that states how a space station appears in each film. That way, for documentary films, we can state that at the beginning of the description.
236:
1719:
1579:
1438:
1179:
352:
313:
1583:
1568:
1422:
1386:
1302:
227:
182:
1675:
1665:
928:
the interest of making the inclusion criteria more clear, but since there is a column for them I'm not sure that's strictly necessary.
1714:
1276:
127:
1709:
1448:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
497:
the term "space station" isn't used. I haven't watched Wall-E in a few months so I can't remember if the term is used in it or not.
446:) for an extended period of time and for other spacecraft to dock. A space station is distinguished from other spacecraft used for
279:
61:
639:- Thank you for your comments - no problem whatsoever - on a related note - just wondering if "Dark City" (station?) in the
1182:). IMDb mentioned January 30, 2015 for a UK release date. If this film is released and gets reviews, we should include it.
1161:
855:
Space.com published a list of space stations, and the Battle School was one of the stations. I've used it as a reference.
139:
131:
135:
122:
86:
1691:
1490:
1067:
27:
1536:
1255:
1218:
1191:
1080:
1028:
960:
911:
864:
845:
754:
675:
626:
546:
344:
1590:
article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
1117:
1439:
https://web.archive.org/web/20131217021327/http://www.rocketcityspacepioneers.com/space/space-stations-in-movies
1661:
The following
Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
1586:'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for
613:, which has been called both a space liner and a space station, according to sources. I'll need to look up the
1382:
1349:
FWIW, you replied to a comment from four years earlier, and the film isn't currently on the list in any case.
1306:
849:
67:
1687:
1481:
1430:
1340:
1280:
1374:
1298:
1272:
1426:
1378:
1510:
1505:
Why is this part of the list? Starkiller Base is not a space station, it's a military base on a planet.
1465:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1442:
640:
451:
360:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
235:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1695:
1651:
1561:
1540:
1514:
1495:
1429:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1407:
1358:
1344:
1330:
1310:
1284:
1259:
1222:
1195:
1165:
1125:
1110:
1084:
1057:
1032:
991:
964:
937:
915:
896:
868:
798:
758:
712:
679:
656:
630:
586:
573:
550:
505:
487:
833:
644:
20:
1646:
1107:
1053:
795:
709:
583:
570:
533:
s Axiom has been called a spaceship, generation ship, and space station. And something similar for
502:
484:
1336:
1269:
There are several
Thunderbirds films and Thunderbird 5 definitely qualifies as a space station.
652:
219:
1466:
1557:
1403:
1354:
1326:
1157:
987:
933:
892:
447:
1520:
1506:
1206:
1473:
1335:
The Icarus I/II isn't a space station per se, but an spaceship (like 2001s
Discovery One).
1178:) may be a list candidate, though it has yet to be released since being produced in 2011 (
879:
How are we defining "featuring" for the purposes of this list? One or more space stations
443:
357:
1395:
1318:
468:
the only spacecraft that are seen are space freighters which are always on the move. In
1643:
1532:
1251:
1214:
1187:
1103:
1076:
1049:
1024:
1014:
956:
907:
860:
841:
791:
750:
705:
671:
622:
579:
566:
542:
498:
480:
464:
203:
176:
1472:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1703:
1657:
Commons files used on this page or its
Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
648:
602:
419:
328:
307:
1553:
1399:
1350:
1322:
1153:
983:
929:
888:
704:. Do the sources only mention the Valley Forge or does it mention the other ships?
126:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can
1621:
1600:
1019:
You've weighed in about this list before. What are your thoughts on the matter?
439:
232:
114:
1686:
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —
1627:"Russian actress to head to ISS in 2021 to star in first feature film in space"
1606:"Russian actress to head to ISS in 2021 to star in first feature film in space"
1578:
to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for
1523:, you're right. The inline citation for that listing is from 2013 and precedes
1171:
745:. I think they're referring to the Valley Forge, though not directly by name?
435:
334:
209:
104:
98:
80:
1528:
1247:
1210:
1183:
1072:
1020:
952:
903:
856:
837:
746:
667:
636:
618:
538:
462:
There are at least two films on the list that do not meet this criteria. In
338:
522:, I think you can see the results in Google Books. Another book, I think
143:
1202:
1175:
455:
1460:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
1443:
http://www.rocketcityspacepioneers.com/space/space-stations-in-movies
470:
1626:
1605:
1527:, so it does not mention Starkiller Base at all. I've removed it.
43:
15:
1098:
438:
capable of supporting a crew, which is designed to remain in
661:
The way I've been checking is to Google "<film title: -->
278:
1433:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
609:
item does not belong for similar reasons. Less sure about
1582:
in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of
518:, there are a few results that identify it that way. For
666:
is a good one, actually, with lots of relevant results.
662:" "space station" and checking results in Google Books.
565:
a no-go a see also section would be a good alternative.
1238:
356:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
231:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
700:The see also section looks good. One last nit for
475:I don't have access to the book that you used for
1242:it under "See also" instead? It is most like the
1209:, so there may be press based on that screening.
142:. To improve this article, please refer to the
8:
1576:Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting
370:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Science Fiction
1421:I have just modified one external link on
1372:
1296:
1270:
302:
171:
138:. To use this banner, please refer to the
75:
49:
47:
1295:This movie should be added to the list.
1745:Low-importance science fiction articles
1371:This movie should be added to the list.
304:
245:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Spaceflight
173:
77:
1584:List of films featuring space stations
1569:List of films featuring space stations
1423:List of films featuring space stations
1730:Space stations working group articles
1097:I took a look at the word feature at
7:
1750:WikiProject Science Fiction articles
373:Template:WikiProject Science Fiction
350:This article is within the scope of
225:This article is within the scope of
120:This article is within the scope of
1740:List-Class science fiction articles
1725:Low-importance spaceflight articles
66:It is of interest to the following
14:
1425:. Please take a moment to review
1394:You're welcome to add it with an
1317:You're welcome to add it with an
1068:List of films with space stations
737:Here is what I looked at before:
1735:WikiProject Spaceflight articles
1451:
1143:
824:
337:
327:
306:
290:the space stations working group
248:Template:WikiProject Spaceflight
212:
202:
175:
152:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Film
136:regional and topical task forces
107:
97:
79:
48:
19:
1720:List-Class spaceflight articles
1594:Reference named "tass20201102":
390:This article has been rated as
265:This article has been rated as
30:on 16 July 2024. The result of
26:This article was nominated for
1676:Soyuz-TMA-13-Mission-Patch.png
1652:17:05, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
1359:01:46, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
1345:00:58, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
1223:18:05, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
1196:18:03, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
645:nearly 2 million miles an hour
516:"wall-e" axiom "space station"
1:
1666:Soyuz MS-19 Mission Patch.png
1541:14:53, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
1515:07:19, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
1496:09:30, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
364:and see a list of open tasks.
287:This article is supported by
239:and see a list of open tasks.
1696:21:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
1547:Rotten Tomatoes as a source?
1260:16:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
1408:13:56, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
1331:13:57, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
1311:19:25, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
1233:I reverted the addition of
353:WikiProject Science Fiction
1766:
1562:14:47, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
1418:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1285:11:04, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
1246:link that is under there.
1141:
869:20:13, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
822:
396:project's importance scale
345:Speculative fiction portal
271:project's importance scale
1715:WikiProject Film articles
1166:21:05, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
850:01:00, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
799:23:23, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
759:21:53, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
713:21:50, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
680:21:48, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
657:21:42, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
631:21:27, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
587:21:22, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
574:21:22, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
555:Thanks for the reply. In
551:21:08, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
506:21:04, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
488:20:59, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
389:
322:
286:
264:
197:
155:Template:WikiProject Film
92:
74:
1710:List-Class film articles
1574:I check pages listed in
1126:01:28, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
1111:21:54, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
1085:19:45, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
1058:19:35, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
1033:16:12, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
992:15:43, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
965:15:02, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
938:13:57, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
916:13:09, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
897:13:01, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
524:Ecology and Popular Film
376:science fiction articles
1629:. TASS. 2 November 2020
1608:. TASS. 2 November 2020
1567:Orphaned references in
1414:External links modified
1121:aka The Red Pen of Doom
228:WikiProject Spaceflight
460:
283:
56:This article is rated
1152:Film has been added.
493:I would add that, in
424:
282:
60:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
818:
251:spaceflight articles
1580:orphaned references
834:Ender's Game (film)
128:join the discussion
1688:Community Tech bot
1484:InternetArchiveBot
1396:appropriate source
1319:appropriate source
1205:it will screen at
442:(most commonly in
284:
220:Spaceflight portal
62:content assessment
1525:The Force Awakens
1501:The Force Awakens
1390:
1377:comment added by
1313:
1301:comment added by
1287:
1275:comment added by
1122:
611:The Fifth Element
607:Starship Troopers
450:by lack of major
448:human spaceflight
410:
409:
406:
405:
402:
401:
301:
300:
297:
296:
170:
169:
166:
165:
130:and see lists of
42:
41:
1757:
1649:
1638:
1636:
1634:
1617:
1615:
1613:
1494:
1485:
1458:
1455:
1454:
1207:Starmus Festival
1168:
1147:
1146:
1123:
1120:
1066:I thought about
1018:
828:
827:
532:
413:Stations v ships
378:
377:
374:
371:
368:
347:
342:
341:
331:
324:
323:
318:
310:
303:
253:
252:
249:
246:
243:
222:
217:
216:
215:
206:
199:
198:
193:
190:
179:
172:
160:
159:
156:
153:
150:
123:WikiProject Film
117:
112:
111:
110:
101:
94:
93:
83:
76:
59:
53:
52:
51:
44:
23:
16:
1765:
1764:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1700:
1699:
1659:
1647:
1632:
1630:
1625:
1611:
1609:
1604:
1572:
1549:
1503:
1488:
1483:
1456:
1452:
1431:this simple FaQ
1416:
1369:
1293:
1291:Sunshine (2007)
1267:
1231:
1169:
1151:
1149:
1144:
1140:
1118:
1012:
877:
831:
830:
825:
821:
530:
444:low Earth orbit
432:orbital station
415:
375:
372:
369:
367:Science Fiction
366:
365:
358:science fiction
343:
336:
316:
314:Science Fiction
250:
247:
244:
241:
240:
218:
213:
211:
191:
185:
157:
154:
151:
148:
147:
113:
108:
106:
57:
12:
11:
5:
1763:
1761:
1753:
1752:
1747:
1742:
1737:
1732:
1727:
1722:
1717:
1712:
1702:
1701:
1684:
1683:
1673:
1658:
1655:
1640:
1639:
1618:
1571:
1565:
1548:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1502:
1499:
1478:
1477:
1470:
1446:
1445:
1437:Added archive
1415:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1379:108.93.181.106
1368:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1333:
1303:108.93.181.106
1292:
1289:
1266:
1263:
1230:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1142:
1139:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1061:
1060:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
972:
971:
970:
969:
968:
967:
943:
942:
941:
940:
925:
919:
918:
876:
873:
872:
871:
823:
820:
817:
816:
815:
814:
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
808:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
689:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
682:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
535:Silent Running
520:Silent Running
509:
508:
465:Silent Running
414:
411:
408:
407:
404:
403:
400:
399:
392:Low-importance
388:
382:
381:
379:
362:the discussion
349:
348:
332:
320:
319:
317:Low‑importance
311:
299:
298:
295:
294:
285:
275:
274:
267:Low-importance
263:
257:
256:
254:
237:the discussion
224:
223:
207:
195:
194:
192:Low‑importance
188:Space stations
180:
168:
167:
164:
163:
161:
119:
118:
102:
90:
89:
84:
72:
71:
65:
54:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1762:
1751:
1748:
1746:
1743:
1741:
1738:
1736:
1733:
1731:
1728:
1726:
1723:
1721:
1718:
1716:
1713:
1711:
1708:
1707:
1705:
1698:
1697:
1693:
1689:
1681:
1677:
1674:
1671:
1667:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1656:
1654:
1653:
1650:
1645:
1628:
1623:
1619:
1607:
1602:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1591:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1577:
1570:
1566:
1564:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1522:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1500:
1498:
1497:
1492:
1487:
1486:
1475:
1471:
1468:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1449:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1419:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1366:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1337:Erick Soares3
1334:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1290:
1288:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1264:
1262:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1240:
1236:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1137:
1127:
1124:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1109:
1105:
1100:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1069:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1046:
1045:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1016:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
993:
989:
985:
980:
979:
978:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
966:
962:
958:
954:
949:
948:
947:
946:
945:
944:
939:
935:
931:
926:
923:
922:
921:
920:
917:
913:
909:
905:
901:
900:
899:
898:
894:
890:
886:
885:Event Horizon
882:
874:
870:
866:
862:
858:
854:
853:
852:
851:
847:
843:
839:
835:
800:
797:
793:
788:
787:
786:
785:
784:
783:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
777:
776:
775:
774:
773:
760:
756:
752:
748:
744:
740:
736:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
714:
711:
707:
703:
699:
698:
697:
696:
695:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
660:
659:
658:
654:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
633:
632:
628:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
604:
600:
599:
598:
597:
588:
585:
581:
577:
576:
575:
572:
568:
563:
558:
554:
553:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
512:
511:
510:
507:
504:
500:
496:
492:
491:
490:
489:
486:
482:
478:
473:
472:
467:
466:
459:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
428:space station
423:
421:
420:space station
412:
397:
393:
387:
384:
383:
380:
363:
359:
355:
354:
346:
340:
335:
333:
330:
326:
325:
321:
315:
312:
309:
305:
292:
291:
281:
277:
276:
272:
268:
262:
259:
258:
255:
238:
234:
230:
229:
221:
210:
208:
205:
201:
200:
196:
189:
184:
181:
178:
174:
162:
158:film articles
145:
141:
140:documentation
137:
133:
129:
125:
124:
116:
105:
103:
100:
96:
95:
91:
88:
85:
82:
78:
73:
69:
63:
55:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1685:
1660:
1641:
1631:. Retrieved
1610:. Retrieved
1593:
1592:
1587:
1573:
1550:
1524:
1504:
1482:
1479:
1459:
1450:
1447:
1420:
1417:
1373:— Preceding
1370:
1297:— Preceding
1294:
1277:31.80.60.210
1271:— Preceding
1268:
1265:Thunderbirds
1243:
1234:
1232:
1170:
884:
880:
878:
832:
819:Ender's Game
701:
663:
614:
610:
606:
561:
556:
534:
527:
523:
519:
515:
494:
476:
469:
463:
461:
431:
427:
425:
416:
391:
351:
288:
266:
226:
121:
68:WikiProjects
35:
1622:Soyuz MS-18
1612:17 November
1601:Soyuz MS-19
1521:Kumagoro-42
1507:Kumagoro-42
1367:2010 (1984)
1099:Wikitionary
242:Spaceflight
233:spaceflight
183:Spaceflight
115:Film portal
1704:Categories
1680:discussion
1670:discussion
1491:Report bug
1235:Passengers
1229:Passengers
1203:looks like
1201:Actually,
1172:51 Degrees
1138:51 Degrees
875:Featuring?
452:propulsion
436:spacecraft
144:guidelines
132:open tasks
58:List-class
1644:AnomieBOT
1474:this tool
1467:this tool
1104:MarnetteD
1050:AngusWOOF
1015:MarnetteD
792:MarnetteD
706:MarnetteD
664:Dark City
641:Dark City
580:MarnetteD
567:MarnetteD
499:MarnetteD
481:MarnetteD
36:Withdrawn
1480:Cheers.—
1387:contribs
1375:unsigned
1299:unsigned
1273:unsigned
1237:as seen
1180:citation
1148:Resolved
865:contribs
846:contribs
829:Resolved
755:contribs
676:contribs
649:Drbogdan
635:Pinging
627:contribs
603:Drbogdan
601:Pinging
547:contribs
458:systems.
422:article
28:deletion
1633:2 April
1554:DonIago
1537:contrib
1427:my edit
1400:DonIago
1351:DonIago
1323:DonIago
1256:contrib
1219:contrib
1192:contrib
1162:contrib
1154:Erik II
1081:contrib
1029:contrib
984:DonIago
961:contrib
930:DonIago
912:contrib
889:DonIago
456:landing
434:) is a
394:on the
269:on the
1244:WALL-E
1119:TRPoD
881:appear
528:WALL-E
471:WALL-E
64:scale.
1620:From
1599:From
617:one.
440:space
1692:talk
1635:2021
1614:2020
1588:this
1558:talk
1533:talk
1529:Erik
1511:talk
1404:talk
1383:talk
1355:talk
1341:talk
1327:talk
1307:talk
1281:talk
1252:talk
1248:Erik
1239:here
1215:talk
1211:Erik
1188:talk
1184:Erik
1176:IMDb
1158:talk
1108:Talk
1077:talk
1073:Erik
1054:talk
1025:talk
1021:Erik
988:talk
957:talk
953:Erik
934:talk
908:talk
904:Erik
893:talk
861:talk
857:Erik
842:talk
838:Erik
796:Talk
751:talk
747:Erik
741:and
710:Talk
672:talk
668:Erik
653:talk
637:Erik
623:talk
619:Erik
615:Dune
584:Talk
571:Talk
562:2001
543:talk
539:Erik
503:Talk
485:Talk
430:(or
149:Film
134:and
87:Film
34:was
1539:)
1441:to
1258:)
1221:)
1194:)
1164:)
1083:)
1031:)
963:)
914:)
883:in
454:or
386:Low
261:Low
1706::
1694:)
1624::
1603::
1560:)
1535:|
1513:)
1406:)
1398:.
1389:)
1385:•
1357:)
1343:)
1329:)
1321:.
1309:)
1283:)
1254:|
1217:|
1190:|
1160:|
1150:–
1106:|
1079:|
1056:)
1027:|
990:)
959:|
936:)
910:|
895:)
867:)
863:|
848:)
844:|
794:|
757:)
753:|
708:|
702:SR
678:)
674:|
655:)
629:)
625:|
582:|
569:|
557:SR
549:)
545:|
537:?
501:|
495:SR
483:|
477:SR
426:A
186::
1690:(
1682:)
1678:(
1672:)
1668:(
1648:⚡
1637:.
1616:.
1556:(
1531:(
1509:(
1493:)
1489:(
1476:.
1469:.
1457:Y
1402:(
1381:(
1353:(
1339:(
1325:(
1305:(
1279:(
1250:(
1213:(
1186:(
1174:(
1156:(
1075:(
1052:(
1023:(
1017::
1013:@
986:(
955:(
932:(
906:(
891:(
859:(
840:(
749:(
743:2
739:1
670:(
651:(
621:(
541:(
531:'
398:.
293:.
273:.
146:.
70::
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
