465:: "Section 27 of the Ontario Heritage Act allows municipalities to list or inventory properties of cultural heritage value that are not designated under Part IV or Part V of the Act. These properties are not afforded the same level of protection as a designated property. While a Heritage Permit is not required for alterations to the property, owners are always welcome to seek staff advice. An owner of a "listed" property is required to give Council 60 days notice of their intention to demolish a building (or portion of a building) on the property."
180:
435:
numerous other examples. Based on treatment of local historic site lists in the U.S. and elsewhere, I think that any local registry is pretty obviously merits
Knowledge coverage as a list-article. If there is a complete list of the local listings available, I think any editor could list them all out. But the existing system seems good and could be comprehensive and incorporate the Kincardine items, perhaps requiring a new column.
246:
282:
71:
53:
258:
170:
139:
22:
371:
The CRHP database is likely incomplete. I'm fairly certain (based on a recent pass through the entire database to update these lists) that there are probably a number of heritage designation authorities whose listings are not represented in it. Bruce County and/or its subdivisions may well be one of
438:
About
Kingston, SportingFlyer points us to source mentioning "Kingston's rich history and culture endures and is kept alive by our treasured heritage properties. To give members some perspective, about 120 buildings in Kingston belong on the national register of historic places, and more than 1,000
434:
Magicpiano has observed there are other local lists left out. CRHP listing doesn't necessarily convey any benefits to a local government, and authority to designate local historic places is already fully delegated to local governments, and we have this
Kincardine example, so I suppose there may be
392:
They say as much on the website, but I can't find anything that shows any other property in
Kincardine is on the register after a couple searches. I do note here that Kingston has 120 properties on the national register and over 1,000 on the local register, further emphasizing the Kincardine sites
457:
Based on defined bounds of the district and Bing satellite view, I would guess there are 50 to 100 buildings in that Market Square
Heritage Conservation District, probably each included into the municipal register. Other CRHP listings in Kingston may have several buildings, but there are no other
430:
I hope we can agree this is simply an editorial question, about whether to include local listings into the existing system of lists, or whether to have separate list-articles for them. About the
Kincardine ones, there is sufficient online documentation, including links to the specific town
431:
resolutions/local laws for each listing, to be sure that this is a legal system, and IMHO it is clear the list of
Kincardine listings is a Knowledge-notable topic. Either there will be a separate list-article for them, or they can be included into the Bruce County list-article section.
454:: "At the municipal level, there are two types of designations under the Ontario Heritage Act – Part IV and Part V. Part IV designations refer to individual heritage properties. Part V designations refer to a grouping of heritage properties known as a Heritage Conservation District."
443:
which might have 120 items (it is not numbered and I am not counting), I notice that "Market Square
Heritage Conservation District" in Kingston is just one CRHP listing, as a historic district, apparently under Part V of the Ontario Heritage
479:
What is available for each of the
Kincardine places is a lot more than is readily available for Kingston's municipal listings. It seems worthwhile to develop a Knowledge list for the Kincardine ones, separately I guess from
331:
484:, in order to include descriptive information into them. Then maybe consider merger back, if the SW Ontario list-article can be modified to include descriptive info in a column? --
556:
536:
481:
226:
423:
Okay, this seems like a useful discussion, what to do about locally listed properties that are not explicitly listed in the CRHP database. I may post a notice at
551:
376:
to be only of things that appear in the CRHP (which is what the lead says), then the
Kincardine listings should not appear here until they appear in the CRHP.
440:
531:
315:
469:
458:
wide historic districts defined, AFAICT. So I presume there are then 700 or so scattered places listed in the municipal register not itemized on CRHP.
521:
115:
546:
291:
236:
153:
121:
561:
349:
This article is not the right place for that information, as it appears the only Kincardine place on the Canadian Historic Register is here:
541:
526:
319:
516:
202:
91:
271:
149:
193:
144:
33:
87:
83:
78:
58:
462:
451:
493:
468:
I assume less is available about these, so maybe no one should want to create a list-article itemizing them. Hmm,
406:
387:
362:
343:
350:
401:
394:
357:
424:
39:
384:
201:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
396:
352:
439:
are listed on the city's municipal register and designated under the Ontario Heritage Act." In
489:
339:
327:
318:, which includes links to local law listings of each one. I just tried adding two sites, the
322:
and another one, but am having trouble using the municipal item column. Any tips? Help! --
378:
472:, with only one column "Name/Notes" having a tiny bit of info available for many of them.
263:
510:
185:
485:
335:
323:
245:
281:
253:
175:
169:
138:
70:
52:
198:
332:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Madison House (Kincardine, Ontario)
330:) 18:09, 9 July 2018 (UTC) P.S. This topic comes up due to ongoing
15:
280:
244:
90:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
393:
should be left off until shown they are on the register:
197:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
470:
here is Kingston's list of them all, 124 pages long
120:This article has not yet received a rating on the
482:List of historic places in Southwestern Ontario
8:
441:List of historic places in Kingston, Ontario
82:, an attempt to structure and organize all
133:
47:
21:
19:
557:Low-importance History of Canada articles
86:. If you wish to help, please visit the
135:
49:
537:Low-importance Canada-related articles
552:List-Class History of Canada articles
461:About other Kingston local listings,
7:
191:This article is within the scope of
76:This article is within the scope of
320:Madison House (Kincardine, Ontario)
38:It is of interest to the following
532:List-Class Canada-related articles
14:
522:Unknown-importance List articles
314:Kincardine sites are covered in
256:
178:
168:
137:
69:
51:
20:
547:Low-importance Ontario articles
310:Kincardine local historic sites
231:This article has been rated as
1:
292:WikiProject History of Canada
289:This article is supported by
269:This article is supported by
205:and see a list of open tasks.
562:All WikiProject Canada pages
211:Knowledge:WikiProject Canada
542:List-Class Ontario articles
372:those. If these lists are
214:Template:WikiProject Canada
100:Knowledge:WikiProject Lists
578:
527:WikiProject Lists articles
237:project's importance scale
122:project's importance scale
103:Template:WikiProject Lists
288:
252:
230:
163:
119:
64:
46:
517:List-Class List articles
494:20:09, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
407:18:55, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
388:18:45, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
363:18:23, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
344:21:39, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
217:Canada-related articles
84:list pages on Knowledge
285:
249:
28:This article is rated
284:
248:
272:WikiProject Ontario
463:Kingston's webpage
452:Kingston's webpage
427:. Some thoughts:
286:
250:
194:WikiProject Canada
34:content assessment
307:
306:
303:
302:
299:
298:
132:
131:
128:
127:
79:WikiProject Lists
569:
404:
381:
360:
266:
261:
260:
259:
219:
218:
215:
212:
209:
188:
183:
182:
181:
172:
165:
164:
159:
156:
141:
134:
108:
107:
104:
101:
98:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
23:
16:
577:
576:
572:
571:
570:
568:
567:
566:
507:
506:
400:
379:
356:
312:
262:
257:
255:
216:
213:
210:
207:
206:
184:
179:
177:
157:
147:
105:
102:
99:
96:
95:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
575:
573:
565:
564:
559:
554:
549:
544:
539:
534:
529:
524:
519:
509:
508:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
476:
475:
474:
473:
466:
459:
455:
446:
445:
436:
432:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
366:
365:
311:
308:
305:
304:
301:
300:
297:
296:
287:
277:
276:
268:
267:
264:Ontario portal
251:
241:
240:
233:Low-importance
229:
223:
222:
220:
203:the discussion
190:
189:
173:
161:
160:
158:Low‑importance
142:
130:
129:
126:
125:
118:
112:
111:
109:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
574:
563:
560:
558:
555:
553:
550:
548:
545:
543:
540:
538:
535:
533:
530:
528:
525:
523:
520:
518:
515:
514:
512:
495:
491:
487:
483:
478:
477:
471:
467:
464:
460:
456:
453:
450:
449:
448:
447:
442:
437:
433:
429:
428:
426:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
408:
405:
403:
398:
397:SportingFlyer
395:
391:
390:
389:
386:
383:
382:
375:
370:
369:
368:
367:
364:
361:
359:
354:
353:SportingFlyer
351:
348:
347:
346:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
316:this document
309:
294:
293:
283:
279:
278:
274:
273:
265:
254:
247:
243:
242:
238:
234:
228:
225:
224:
221:
204:
200:
196:
195:
187:
186:Canada portal
176:
174:
171:
167:
166:
162:
155:
151:
146:
143:
140:
136:
123:
117:
114:
113:
110:
106:List articles
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
18:
17:
399:
377:
373:
355:
313:
290:
270:
232:
192:
88:project page
77:
40:WikiProjects
511:Categories
92:discussion
30:List-class
425:wt:CANADA
486:Doncram
374:defined
336:Doncram
324:Doncram
235:on the
154:History
150:Ontario
385:♪piano
208:Canada
199:Canada
145:Canada
36:scale.
380:Magic
97:Lists
59:Lists
490:talk
444:Act:
402:talk
358:talk
340:talk
334:. --
328:talk
227:Low
116:???
513::
492:)
342:)
152:/
148::
488:(
338:(
326:(
295:.
275:.
239:.
124:.
94:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
