407:
380:
926:. If there is not a WP article on a given piece of literature, then I would fully expect that entry to cite a source demonstrating its relevancy to biology or a sub-discipline. Annotations are a powerful method to demonstrate relevancy and should be encouraged if they can be supported by sources. Remember we are writing this WP article so that readers interested in biology can learn about the literature on the subject. My gut tells me, that this list is but 25% or less complete, but its a good start as a
1400:: obviously, this is a controversial move, since two editors are now opposing it. You should not have renamed these lists to bibliographies without discussion, but having renamed them, you should have left them alone unless someone actually objected. So far, the only rename that has met with any comment at all is the physics list, so all these reverts are merely causing more disruption. There is no need for consistency between the names, no need for a mass renaming, and therefore no need for an
203:
193:
172:
417:
308:
287:
95:
33:
862:. I have also added all the relevant publications I could find that have pages on Knowledge (XXG). The next part is harder. There are several general references for the list as a whole and some of the sections, but I have only limited access to their contents so they have very few citations. Also, most of the annotations still do not have citations. I would appreciate some help with that.
536:
85:
64:
512:
1074:, not evolutionary biology. Fisher unified the views of the "Mendelians" and "Biometricians", showing that polygenic inheritance could account for the inheritance of continuously distributed characters (studied by the Biometricians and as opposed to the discrete characters studied by the Mendelians). --
582:
Are you really saying that if there are references for classic papers/landmark papers/etc. in microbiology, cell biology, genetics, yeast biology and bacterial viruses, that is not enough to establish the notability of important publications in all of biology? Moreover, every one of the publications
1776:. The former has not been deleted as it it a redirect to the latter. Consensus is of course desirable and I think consensus will eventually be reached to move all the lists of publications in science to bibliographies. However, each list has existed as an island, without much central discussion at
1069:
I admire all the effort that RockMagnetist is putting into this and would only wish that he'd spend that energy to a better goal. I still think that this list is bound to remain something eclectic and arbitrary and will be contentious for years to come. Nevertheless, let me offer a tiny point of
954:
Rock - Great job so far, more work to do, but I like how you are pulling this together. Most of my recent edits here have been to provide examples and you've taken the bait nicely. I am going to leave you to it, but remember to tap those other sources of information. Google is not necessarily
1634:
A separate article for a bibiolography may be appropriate, but turning a list of important publications into a bibliography was not done with process. This is to establish explicit and formal consensus that the community believes this should be an appropriate standalone
1650:
I don't understand what's being requested here. Are you saying the article should be renamed? or that it should be deleted? In the former case, the requested move has already been declined. In the latter case, a deletion request surely needs to go through the usual
1708:
I agree that such discussion should be started before such little disucsion has taken place. If I did not make that position before, I feel that consistency is important, so I believe that this article should go through dialogue-consensus instead of
623:
I agree. There must be thousands of papers/books where somebody somewhere once said "landmark paper" or something like that. And for many papers/books I still don't see a justification for inclusion, which remains haphazard, eclectic, and arbitrary.
583:
has its own
Knowledge (XXG) article. Consistent with the recent AfD discussions of similar lists, there are no longer any grounds for WP:OR or WP:NPOV, so I am going to delete the multiple issues template (the cleanup tag is too vague to be useful).
1939:
Well, I would reopen it as an RfC request is now in action. Still, there should be at least several RfC and local editors who think it would be a good idea to actually reopen the move discussion. RfC is open for a couple of days, so let's wait. —
570:" which has not yet been done. The problem of WP:OR has not been solved. Until there is a Cite from where this List is drawn from, it is just a list of what good intentioned WP Editors 'feel' is important. Please send it back to the incubator.
1845:, I used the same boldness to move the other pages, as I felt sooner or later the pages would be moved. As there was/is no consensus at the time to have the series renamed to the bibliography suffix, I see no reason for a blanking of
1331:
about this after losing several deletion discussions and being chastised by other editors for at least ten unilateral and undiscussed moves on his part. Curb Chain even voted to delete this article when the title contained the word
522:
234:
1584:
A perennial issue on this and similar pages is how to set criteria for the list. I have carefully considered existing guidelines and tried to craft a broad set of policies that satisfy them. I have posted it on the
1003:
Curb, I think that tranforming these into
Bibliographies where relevancy to a topic is easily established through published bibliographies, reviews and such is the way to deal with the subjectiveness of a word like
1012:
by any other name and I am hoping we can garner sufficient support for the WikiProject
Bibliography to transform all such lists into good, encyclopedic bibliographies. I am hoping you will join us in that
891:
Strictly speaking, the annotations aren't needed for the entries that have their own articles; but if an annotation is added, it needs a citation. Some of the annotations could probably be dispensed with.
1474:
You should have started a
Bibliography article from scratch. Reverting this back to the original title is uncontroversial. Retaining the information before the rename should be uncontroversial as well.
473:
1142:
Sorry, I must have missed something but up above somewhere is the statement that the article will "provide a lead section with unambiguous inclusion criteria". Surely this should be part of Phase 1?
1835:
as a test case. What this means escapes me, as it was clear that the other series of articles where not to be renamed. When asked if all such pages (in the series) would be renamed he answered
823:
Let me note that I'm about to remove the
Neuroscience section -- the two books listed are not even neuroscience books. This ought to ease the process of merging the material to other articles.
628:? Please... Didn't introduce anything new and was influential in the English-speaking part of the world. With all its undeniable qualities, that one didn't change biology as we know it... --
485:
390:
1160:
I'm going to try applying the notability criteria for academic and technical books (see my latest edit) and see how that goes. The same criteria would apply to articles in a journal.
750:
753:. The first step is to rename the list to a Bibliography. The second is to rewrite the list in the recommended form and provide a lead section with unambiguous inclusion criteria.
269:
1716:
Another editor states: "My point is that the naming preferences of a new project are not on their own enough to override the existing consensus that this page is appropriate." (
2168:
259:
1810:
1589:. I would welcome your comments. Of course, these guidelines are not intended to be binding for any particular page, but might help you choose your own selection criteria.
1721:
1118:
Thanks for the suggestions. I must admit that I haven't really spent much time thinking about the entries or where they belong. Most of them were there before I started.
1323:
Current title is the correct title for an article that was resurrected from deletion by another editor and brought into compliance with WP guidelines based on advice in
859:
2072:
2068:
2054:
569:
as an example of how this should be correctly done. It was sent to the incubator to give it time for someone to find a Cite that has a "List of important <stuff: -->
2198:
2173:
463:
2125:
The Fisher, Schrödinger and
Pauling refs look dated and only marginally relevant. Post 2000 sources are badly needed for genetics (whatever that may be becoming...).
229:
2208:
2163:
1430:. If you felt that the information at the original article should be incorporated into the new article/title, you should have proposed a split, which was not done.
490:
1690:
1371:
1543:- this is the better title. Also, since a split is being mentioned above, there is no reason to split this into two such articles. That makes no sense at all.
1433:
I was the one who moved those pages. A selfrevert is totally appropriate, and I object to the name "Bibliography of..." if not all these pages are named such.
1784:. Time needs to be given for discussion on the talk pages of each of these lists and and these projects. Several editors, including myself, have suggested to
1502:
Let's see. A unilateral move is uncontroversial on this page, but when I asked you if all the other pages would be moved to the new name, and when I did, it
1586:
439:
2203:
2193:
225:
216:
177:
154:
1897:
1846:
1769:
1621:
1605:
1423:
1378:
1224:
970:
922:
to the subject of biology and its sub-disciplines. Literature that is widely cited in published biology related biblographies, reviews and such are
362:
2153:
688:
References provided. I don't see what has not been addressed. I would contest that speedy deletion. If you want it deleted you can submit to afd.
144:
1458:, and I am holding it up as an example for editors of other lists. By renaming it, you would be undermining my efforts to improve bibliographies.
1781:
1777:
430:
385:
2183:
2158:
608:
books are the important ones. Otherwise, in 6 months after a whole lot of well intentioned WP Editors have added their favorite book to this
352:
120:
2148:
2040:
2030:
1788:
that he slows down and some have suggested that he is being disruptive. I certainly do not see this RfC as being helpful at this time. --
2218:
2213:
2188:
328:
1454:: The most important for not renaming this bibliography: I have rebuilt this list as an example of what we are trying to achieve with
2178:
2050:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
772:
The move seems to have deleted the comments that were present on this talk page, including the tag referring to the previous AfD. --
930:
article. Don't fear the odd entry that someone might add that isn't really relevant and isn't sourced well, it won't last long.--
1367:
111:
69:
1230:
Until consensus changes on the other pages, this page should not be alone as the only article of its kind to be named this way.
1689:
For comparision: In a discussion regarding a move to "Bibilography" on "List of important publications in physics" an editor
44:
324:
320:
315:
292:
224:
content on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
542:
2115:
1768:
There is no essential difference between a list of publications and a bibliography, so there is no reason to have both
1573:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
1274:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
1199:
Curb's right. In simple terms, we don't wikilink to WP guidelines, projects or essays inside a WP article. A link to
518:
221:
1871:
haven't clearly stated what action you are requesting. If we don't know what the question is, how can we vote on it?
1245:
There doesn't have to be agreement across all the pages! Please leave this page alone, unless you are adding content.
1305:– This is a procedural revert to the original title. It was unilaterally moved to this new title without consensus.
927:
969:
So do you plan to dispense with "important" with the rest of the "important" articles such as the ones listed at
208:
2071:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1981:
1455:
1377:
If you feel that a bibliography of biology is acceptable, that can be a separate article, but having a separate
1324:
406:
379:
2130:
711:
566:
1780:, the parent Project, although it has recently become more active. That is now a task force of a new project,
50:
17:
2106:
2022:
2014:
1960:
1929:
1893:
1876:
1850:
1832:
1818:
1773:
1754:
1613:
1594:
1553:
1493:
1463:
1427:
1409:
1296:
1250:
1189:
1165:
1143:
1123:
1046:
897:
867:
843:
758:
663:
588:
672:
WIth all respect for the efforts that have gone into this resurrection, to me this is still a clear G4. --
1694:
2090:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2078:
1693:: "If you're proposing modifying this list, then in addition to having a thread here, start a thread at
1336:
because important could not be adequately defined, but now when that issue has been corrected, he wants
1287:
438:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2041:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130727182113/http://community.weber.edu/sciencemuseum/pages/life_main.asp
2021:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
658:
I agree. This issue has been argued to death, and we should all go away and do something constructive.
609:
2031:
https://web.archive.org/web/20040608113114/http://www.bio.txstate.edu/~wetlands/Glossary/glossary.html
1858:
1732:
1640:
1511:
1479:
1438:
1386:
1351:
1310:
1235:
1208:
1032:
1018:
978:
960:
935:
882:
792:
746:
693:
649:
644:
This comment applies to all the other "important" lists. There's no point in singling this one out.
546:
511:
2126:
1656:
1342:
1328:
1991:
1956:
1945:
1925:
1909:
1872:
1814:
1750:
1746:
1673:
1664:
1590:
1545:
1489:
1459:
1405:
1246:
1185:
1161:
1119:
1042:
893:
863:
839:
828:
754:
659:
584:
2075:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1901:
710:, only a reliable secondary source can do that. Its obvious you have not actually looked at how
2091:
2044:
2034:
1842:
1200:
1283:
1105:
1079:
806:
777:
677:
633:
2098:
1702:
1652:
1628:
1401:
1363:
1181:
597:
If a Cite says "Book X is important" then that Cite belongs on the
Article about Book X. A
550:
1854:
1796:
1785:
1728:
1683:
1636:
1507:
1475:
1434:
1382:
1347:
1306:
1231:
1204:
1028:
1014:
974:
956:
931:
878:
788:
742:
689:
645:
1955:
Reopening a request mere days after it was rejected would be grounds for a speedy close.
707:
2057:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
435:
100:
2097:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2064:
1609:
192:
171:
2142:
1987:
1941:
1905:
1742:
1660:
824:
1727:
I am simply asking for consensus because I believe consistency should be considered.
416:
2134:
2120:
1995:
1964:
1949:
1933:
1913:
1880:
1862:
1822:
1803:
1758:
1736:
1668:
1644:
1598:
1559:
1535:
1515:
1497:
1483:
1467:
1442:
1413:
1390:
1355:
1314:
1291:
1254:
1239:
1212:
1193:
1169:
1154:
1127:
1109:
1083:
1050:
1036:
1022:
982:
964:
939:
901:
886:
871:
858:
The bibliography is now organized and formatted according to the guidelines in the
847:
832:
810:
796:
781:
762:
720:
697:
681:
667:
653:
637:
618:
592:
576:
422:
1101:
1075:
802:
773:
673:
629:
918:
has been removed from both the title and lead. What we are looking for here is
94:
2063:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1789:
1070:
advice to improve it a little bit: Fisher's 1918 paper is a landmark paper in
412:
198:
90:
535:
307:
286:
877:
So phase 2 entails providing citations to prove that an entry is important?
602:
needs to come from somewhere, other than a WP Editors opinion, to say that
1717:
1624:
should be deleted when it was recently restored from article incubation
1180:
Curb, I'm puzzled by your latest edit. How does changing ] to ] satisfy
838:
Instead of removing it, could you find the proper home for those books?
116:
84:
63:
1100:
goes under taxonomy, not zoology (I would put both under taxonomy). --
1268:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal.
1567:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.
1008:. A list of publications, regardless of inclusion criteria, is a
741:
I am making this list the first test case for the policies that
612:, we are going to end up in the same place we were 3 weeks ago.
1488:
You have a strange notion of the meaning of "uncontroversial".
1900:
and further redirected to it. Just for naming consistency and
1659:. Could you please spell out exactly what you're asking for?
530:
506:
26:
2045:
http://community.weber.edu/sciencemuseum/pages/life_main.asp
115:, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
2035:
http://www.bio.txstate.edu/~wetlands/Glossary/glossary.html
1697:
pointing to this discussion. If you're proposing modifying
1374:
this is an uncontraversial move back to the original title.
2025:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
327:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
228:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
1422:
This was probably bad form to turn the original article
1223:
There obviously was no consensus to move this page from
2018:
1892:: I think it should be done in reverse direction — the
1722:
Talk:List of important publications in mathematics#Move
1681:
1677:
1625:
1620:
This is an rfc to establish consensus that the article
1301:
119:
on
Knowledge (XXG). Leave messages on the WikiProject
564:
Where are these lists drawn from? I am <again: -->
434:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2067:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1027:So, eventually, all such articles will be renamed?
1984:is working on this, I withdraw all my comments.
1655:process, unless you think it's a candidate for
1041:Yes, assuming other contributors don't object.
2053:This message was posted before February 2018.
1749:)'s question. What action are you requesting?
1372:Talk:List of important publications in physics
244:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject History of Science
18:Talk:List of important publications in biology
235:History of Science Collaboration of the Month
8:
319:, an attempt to structure and organize all
2169:Mid-importance history of science articles
1782:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Bibliographies
1778:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Science pearls
448:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Bibliographies
374:
281:
166:
58:
32:
30:
2013:I have just modified 2 external links on
1898:List of important publications in biology
1847:List of important publications in biology
1770:List of important publications in biology
1622:List of important publications in biology
1606:List of important publications in biology
1424:List of important publications in biology
1379:List of important publications in biology
1302:List of important publications in biology
1225:list of important publications in biology
971:List of important publications in science
220:, an attempt to improve and organize the
323:. If you wish to help, please visit the
2199:High-importance Bibliographies articles
2174:WikiProject History of Science articles
376:
283:
247:Template:WikiProject History of Science
168:
60:
2209:Top-importance Science pearls articles
2164:List-Class history of science articles
1836:
1362:Considering this was not raised by an
549:. Please only add items that meet the
787:I'll try and get this fixed today. --
7:
1813:to terminate this discussion early.
914:Curb, you'll note that the criteria
428:This article is within the scope of
313:This article is within the scope of
1921:
1368:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biology
860:draft of WikiProject Bibliographies
751:draft of WikiProject Bibliographies
451:Template:WikiProject Bibliographies
129:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biology
49:It is of interest to the following
2204:List-Class Science pearls articles
2194:List-Class Bibliographies articles
1828:
25:
2017:. Please take a moment to review
1980:Taking in consideration that the
1741:Curb, you still haven't answered
337:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Lists
1920:That would be equivalent to the
1676:made an unilateral move without
1381:is perfectly acceptable as well.
534:
510:
415:
405:
378:
306:
285:
201:
191:
170:
93:
83:
62:
31:
2154:Mid-importance Biology articles
517:This article was nominated for
468:This article has been rated as
357:This article has been rated as
264:This article has been rated as
149:This article has been rated as
2135:11:26, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
232:. You can also help with the
217:History of Science WikiProject
1:
1996:18:59, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
1965:18:31, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
1950:16:57, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
1934:16:35, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
1914:10:21, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
1881:07:14, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
1863:07:06, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
1823:06:24, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
1804:04:17, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
1759:05:01, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
1737:03:57, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
1705:, as I've already suggested."
1669:03:18, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
1645:02:16, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
1370:as suggested by an editor on
1292:20:14, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
521:on 2011-09-23. The result of
483:This article is supported by
442:and see a list of open tasks.
321:list pages on Knowledge (XXG)
2184:Mid-importance List articles
2159:WikiProject Biology articles
1599:00:08, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
1560:03:35, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
1536:01:00, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
1529:- its just easier this way.
1516:04:18, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
1498:01:30, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
1484:01:03, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
1468:00:58, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
1443:01:01, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
1414:00:53, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
1391:00:21, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
1356:00:03, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
1327:. Curb Chain is being very
1315:23:49, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
1255:05:14, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
1240:03:42, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
1219:Revert The Move Of This Page
1213:17:21, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
1194:16:36, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
1170:04:23, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
1155:23:52, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
1128:14:55, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
1110:08:32, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
1096:is listed under botany, but
1084:08:24, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
1051:03:08, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
1037:02:34, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
1023:01:01, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
983:00:30, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
965:23:18, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
940:23:18, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
902:22:52, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
887:22:49, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
872:22:43, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
848:16:32, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
833:16:30, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
811:11:56, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
797:11:09, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
782:07:38, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
763:17:56, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
721:23:43, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
698:16:45, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
682:16:19, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
668:16:02, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
654:14:18, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
638:09:55, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
619:09:22, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
593:06:17, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
577:03:51, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
214:This article is part of the
132:Template:WikiProject Biology
2149:List-Class Biology articles
1580:Proposed selection criteria
1203:is not really necessary. --
955:reliable source nirvana. --
601:of important <stuff: -->
250:history of science articles
2235:
2219:WikiProject Bibliographies
2214:WikiProject Science pearls
2189:WikiProject Lists articles
2084:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2010:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1982:WikiProject Bibliographies
1456:WikiProject Bibliographies
1325:WikiProject Bibliographies
431:WikiProject Bibliographies
363:project's importance scale
340:Template:WikiProject Lists
270:project's importance scale
155:project's importance scale
2121:18:11, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
482:
467:
400:
356:
301:
263:
209:History of science portal
186:
148:
78:
57:
2179:List-Class List articles
1924:that was just rejected.
1587:Science pearls talk page
1570:Please do not modify it.
1340:back in the title. Very
1271:Please do not modify it.
712:List of important operas
567:List of important operas
553:established in the lead.
2015:Bibliography of biology
2006:External links modified
1894:Bibliography of biology
1851:Bibliography of biology
1833:Bibliography of biology
1774:Bibliography of biology
1614:Bibliography of biology
1428:Bibliography of biology
1297:Bibliography of biology
1092:Another inconsistency:
749:) is developing in his
454:Bibliographies articles
107:Bibliography of biology
1896:should be merged into
768:disappearing talk page
565:going to point to the
39:This article is rated
1701:such lists, start an
708:created by WP Editors
486:the Science Taskforce
43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
2065:regular verification
2055:After February 2018
1988:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
1942:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
1906:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
1811:made an ANI request
1506:it's controversial?
1176:How is this WP:NSR?
547:notability criteria
112:WikiProject Biology
2109:InternetArchiveBot
2060:InternetArchiveBot
1674:User:RockMagnetist
1138:Inclusion criteria
551:selection criteria
241:History of Science
222:history of science
178:History of Science
45:content assessment
2085:
1534:
1094:Species Plantarum
854:Phase 1 completed
719:
714:backs itself up.
617:
575:
557:
556:
529:
528:
505:
504:
501:
500:
497:
496:
373:
372:
369:
368:
316:WikiProject Lists
280:
279:
276:
275:
165:
164:
161:
160:
16:(Redirected from
2226:
2119:
2110:
2083:
2082:
2061:
1849:and redirect-to-
1801:
1794:
1713:editing actions.
1686:fixed this move.
1627:without another
1572:
1558:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1533:
1532:
1366:or mentioned to
1304:
1273:
1152:
1150:
928:WP:Summary Style
718:
717:
616:
615:
574:
573:
545:that meets list
543:stand-alone list
538:
531:
514:
507:
474:importance scale
456:
455:
452:
449:
446:
425:
420:
419:
409:
402:
401:
396:
393:
382:
375:
345:
344:
341:
338:
335:
310:
303:
302:
297:
289:
282:
252:
251:
248:
245:
242:
211:
206:
205:
204:
195:
188:
187:
182:
174:
167:
137:
136:
135:Biology articles
133:
130:
127:
103:
98:
97:
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
42:
36:
35:
34:
27:
21:
2234:
2233:
2229:
2228:
2227:
2225:
2224:
2223:
2139:
2138:
2113:
2108:
2076:
2069:have permission
2059:
2023:this simple FaQ
2008:
1797:
1790:
1684:User:Mike Cline
1680:. Apparently,
1657:speedy deletion
1629:deletion debate
1618:
1582:
1577:
1568:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1544:
1530:
1300:
1269:
1263:
1221:
1178:
1146:
1144:
1140:
1098:Systema Naturae
856:
821:
770:
739:
715:
706:list cannot be
613:
571:
562:
470:High-importance
453:
450:
447:
444:
443:
421:
414:
395:High‑importance
394:
388:
342:
339:
336:
333:
332:
295:
249:
246:
243:
240:
239:
207:
202:
200:
180:
134:
131:
128:
125:
124:
109:is part of the
99:
92:
72:
40:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
2232:
2230:
2222:
2221:
2216:
2211:
2206:
2201:
2196:
2191:
2186:
2181:
2176:
2171:
2166:
2161:
2156:
2151:
2141:
2140:
2127:Macdonald-ross
2103:
2102:
2095:
2048:
2047:
2039:Added archive
2037:
2029:Added archive
2007:
2004:
2003:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1967:
1922:requested move
1886:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1840:
1831:, he is using
1825:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1725:
1714:
1706:
1687:
1617:
1602:
1581:
1578:
1576:
1575:
1563:
1562:
1538:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1471:
1470:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1431:
1417:
1416:
1394:
1393:
1375:
1359:
1358:
1277:
1276:
1264:
1262:
1261:Requested move
1259:
1258:
1257:
1220:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1177:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1139:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1113:
1112:
1087:
1086:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
992:
991:
990:
989:
988:
987:
986:
985:
947:
946:
945:
944:
943:
942:
907:
906:
905:
904:
855:
852:
851:
850:
820:
817:
816:
815:
814:
813:
769:
766:
738:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
723:
685:
684:
641:
640:
626:Gray's Anatomy
561:
558:
555:
554:
539:
527:
526:
523:the discussion
515:
503:
502:
499:
498:
495:
494:
491:Top-importance
481:
478:
477:
466:
460:
459:
457:
445:Bibliographies
440:the discussion
436:Bibliographies
427:
426:
410:
398:
397:
386:Bibliographies
383:
371:
370:
367:
366:
359:Mid-importance
355:
349:
348:
346:
311:
299:
298:
296:Mid‑importance
290:
278:
277:
274:
273:
266:Mid-importance
262:
256:
255:
253:
213:
212:
196:
184:
183:
181:Mid‑importance
175:
163:
162:
159:
158:
151:Mid-importance
147:
141:
140:
138:
105:
104:
101:Biology portal
88:
76:
75:
73:Mid‑importance
67:
55:
54:
48:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2231:
2220:
2217:
2215:
2212:
2210:
2207:
2205:
2202:
2200:
2197:
2195:
2192:
2190:
2187:
2185:
2182:
2180:
2177:
2175:
2172:
2170:
2167:
2165:
2162:
2160:
2157:
2155:
2152:
2150:
2147:
2146:
2144:
2137:
2136:
2132:
2128:
2123:
2122:
2117:
2112:
2111:
2100:
2096:
2093:
2089:
2088:
2087:
2080:
2074:
2070:
2066:
2062:
2056:
2051:
2046:
2042:
2038:
2036:
2032:
2028:
2027:
2026:
2024:
2020:
2016:
2011:
2005:
1997:
1993:
1989:
1985:
1983:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1973:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1957:RockMagnetist
1954:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1947:
1943:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1931:
1927:
1926:RockMagnetist
1923:
1919:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1911:
1907:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1882:
1878:
1874:
1873:RockMagnetist
1870:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1860:
1856:
1852:
1848:
1844:
1841:
1838:
1834:
1830:
1829:RockMagnetist
1827:According to
1826:
1824:
1820:
1816:
1815:RockMagnetist
1812:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1802:
1800:
1795:
1793:
1787:
1783:
1779:
1775:
1771:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1751:RockMagnetist
1748:
1744:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1734:
1730:
1726:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1712:
1707:
1704:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1685:
1682:
1679:
1675:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1642:
1638:
1632:
1630:
1626:
1623:
1615:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1601:
1600:
1596:
1592:
1591:RockMagnetist
1588:
1579:
1574:
1571:
1565:
1564:
1561:
1557:
1549:
1542:
1539:
1537:
1528:
1525:
1524:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1505:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1490:RockMagnetist
1487:
1486:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1472:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1460:RockMagnetist
1457:
1453:
1450:
1449:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1406:RockMagnetist
1403:
1399:
1396:
1395:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1360:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1344:
1339:
1335:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1303:
1298:
1294:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1275:
1272:
1266:
1265:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1247:RockMagnetist
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1228:
1226:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1186:RockMagnetist
1183:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1162:RockMagnetist
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1153:
1151:
1149:
1148:Granitethighs
1137:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1120:RockMagnetist
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1068:
1067:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1043:RockMagnetist
1040:
1039:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1011:
1007:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
984:
980:
976:
972:
968:
967:
966:
962:
958:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
948:
941:
937:
933:
929:
925:
921:
917:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
903:
899:
895:
894:RockMagnetist
890:
889:
888:
884:
880:
876:
875:
874:
873:
869:
865:
864:RockMagnetist
861:
853:
849:
845:
841:
840:RockMagnetist
837:
836:
835:
834:
830:
826:
818:
812:
808:
804:
800:
799:
798:
794:
790:
786:
785:
784:
783:
779:
775:
767:
765:
764:
760:
756:
755:RockMagnetist
752:
748:
744:
737:Move of pages
736:
722:
713:
709:
705:
701:
700:
699:
695:
691:
687:
686:
683:
679:
675:
671:
670:
669:
665:
661:
660:RockMagnetist
657:
656:
655:
651:
647:
643:
642:
639:
635:
631:
627:
622:
621:
620:
611:
607:
606:
600:
596:
595:
594:
590:
586:
585:RockMagnetist
581:
580:
579:
578:
568:
559:
552:
548:
544:
540:
537:
533:
532:
524:
520:
516:
513:
509:
508:
492:
489:(assessed as
488:
487:
480:
479:
475:
471:
465:
462:
461:
458:
441:
437:
433:
432:
424:
418:
413:
411:
408:
404:
403:
399:
392:
387:
384:
381:
377:
364:
360:
354:
351:
350:
347:
343:List articles
330:
326:
322:
318:
317:
312:
309:
305:
304:
300:
294:
291:
288:
284:
271:
267:
261:
258:
257:
254:
237:
236:
231:
227:
223:
219:
218:
210:
199:
197:
194:
190:
189:
185:
179:
176:
173:
169:
156:
152:
146:
143:
142:
139:
122:
118:
114:
113:
108:
102:
96:
91:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
29:
28:
19:
2124:
2107:
2104:
2079:source check
2058:
2052:
2049:
2012:
2009:
1979:
1938:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1868:
1799:(Discussion)
1798:
1791:
1767:
1710:
1698:
1633:
1619:
1604:RfC: Should
1583:
1569:
1566:
1540:
1526:
1503:
1451:
1397:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1320:
1295:
1280:No consensus
1279:
1278:
1270:
1267:
1229:
1222:
1179:
1147:
1145:
1141:
1097:
1093:
1071:
1010:Bibliography
1009:
1005:
923:
919:
915:
857:
822:
819:Neuroscience
771:
740:
703:
625:
604:
603:
598:
563:
484:
469:
429:
423:Books portal
358:
325:project page
314:
265:
233:
226:project page
215:
150:
110:
106:
51:WikiProjects
1904:reasons. —
1890:RfC comment
1284:Vegaswikian
610:WP:COATRACK
525:was Delete.
2143:Categories
2116:Report bug
1855:Curb Chain
1843:Being bold
1786:Curb Chain
1729:Curb Chain
1678:discussion
1637:Curb Chain
1610:redirected
1508:Curb Chain
1476:Curb Chain
1435:Curb Chain
1383:Curb Chain
1348:Mike Cline
1307:Curb Chain
1232:Curb Chain
1205:Mike Cline
1029:Curb Chain
1015:Mike Cline
975:Curb Chain
957:Mike Cline
932:Mike Cline
879:Curb Chain
801:Thanks! --
789:Mike Cline
743:Mike Cline
690:Curb Chain
646:Curb Chain
541:This is a
329:discussion
230:discussion
41:List-class
2099:this tool
2092:this tool
1531:Exit2DOS
1343:WP:POINTY
1338:important
1334:important
1329:WP:Pointy
1282:to move.
1013:effort.--
1006:important
920:relevancy
916:important
716:Exit2DOS
704:Qualified
614:Exit2DOS
572:Exit2DOS
560:Where ???
121:talk page
2105:Cheers.—
1902:WP:SPADE
1743:Jowa fan
1718:User:CBM
1661:Jowa fan
1072:genetics
924:relevant
825:Looie496
519:deletion
2019:my edit
1809:I have
1711:editing
1695:WT:PHYS
1555:Shalott
1452:Comment
1201:notable
472:on the
391:Science
361:on the
268:on the
153:on the
126:Biology
117:biology
70:Biology
1691:opined
1541:Oppose
1527:Oppose
1402:WP:RFC
1398:Oppose
1364:WP:RFC
1321:Oppose
1182:WP:NSR
1102:Crusio
1076:Crusio
803:Crusio
774:Crusio
674:Crusio
630:Crusio
47:scale.
1869:still
1792:Bduke
1635:case.
1426:into
605:these
334:Lists
293:Lists
2131:talk
1992:talk
1961:talk
1946:talk
1930:talk
1910:talk
1877:talk
1867:You
1859:talk
1819:talk
1772:and
1755:talk
1747:talk
1733:talk
1699:many
1665:talk
1641:talk
1595:talk
1547:Lady
1512:talk
1494:talk
1480:talk
1464:talk
1439:talk
1410:talk
1387:talk
1352:talk
1311:talk
1288:talk
1251:talk
1236:talk
1209:talk
1190:talk
1166:talk
1124:talk
1106:talk
1080:talk
1047:talk
1033:talk
1019:talk
979:talk
961:talk
936:talk
898:talk
883:talk
868:talk
844:talk
829:talk
807:talk
793:talk
778:talk
759:talk
747:talk
694:talk
678:talk
664:talk
650:talk
634:talk
599:List
589:talk
464:High
2073:RfC
2043:to
2033:to
1837:yes
1703:RFC
1653:AfD
1612:to
1608:be
353:Mid
260:Mid
145:Mid
2145::
2133:)
2086:.
2081:}}
2077:{{
1994:)
1986:—
1963:)
1948:)
1932:)
1912:)
1879:)
1861:)
1821:)
1757:)
1735:)
1667:)
1643:)
1631:.
1597:)
1551:of
1514:)
1496:)
1482:)
1466:)
1441:)
1412:)
1404:.
1389:)
1354:)
1346:--
1313:)
1299:→
1290:)
1253:)
1238:)
1227:.
1211:)
1192:)
1184:?
1168:)
1126:)
1108:)
1082:)
1049:)
1035:)
1021:)
981:)
963:)
938:)
900:)
885:)
870:)
846:)
831:)
809:)
795:)
780:)
761:)
702:A
696:)
680:)
666:)
652:)
636:)
591:)
493:).
389::
2129:(
2118:)
2114:(
2101:.
2094:.
1990:(
1959:(
1944:(
1928:(
1908:(
1875:(
1857:(
1853:.
1839:.
1817:(
1753:(
1745:(
1731:(
1724:)
1720:/
1663:(
1639:(
1616:?
1593:(
1510:(
1504:,
1492:(
1478:(
1462:(
1437:(
1408:(
1385:(
1350:(
1309:(
1286:(
1249:(
1234:(
1207:(
1188:(
1164:(
1122:(
1104:(
1078:(
1045:(
1031:(
1017:(
977:(
973:?
959:(
934:(
896:(
881:(
866:(
842:(
827:(
805:(
791:(
776:(
757:(
745:(
692:(
676:(
662:(
648:(
632:(
587:(
476:.
365:.
331:.
272:.
238:.
157:.
123:.
53::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
