305:
1253:"The differential equations determining the evolution function Φ t are often ordinary differential equations: in this case the phase space M is a finite dimensional manifold. Many of the concepts in dynamical systems can be extended to infinite-dimensional manifolds—those that are locally Banach spaces—in which case the differential equations are partial differential equations. In the late 20th century the dynamical system perspective to partial differential equations started gaining popularity."
295:
274:
32:
206:
188:
157:
1315:"; this is established terminology, even if it is not really (wait for it) logical. On the other hand, set theory (except, possibly, for very elementary set theory, such as Venn diagrams and so on) is not standardly characterized as discrete math. I do agree that order theory doesn't belong under logic, but I'm not so sure it goes under discrete math either. --
576:. The decision to make them into portal subpages shouldn't be attempted one list at a time. This is an issue that concerns the whole class of pages known as "lists of lists", and it should be discussed at a wider forum. Many issues need to be discussed concerning these lists (there are more than 80 lists of lists), such as:
586:- Knowledge's default search box settings do not include portal space. Lists of lists would no longer show up in the search results of most users' searches. Lists of lists, which are essential navigation aids, would be partially buried. They'd still support navigation via browsing, but not navigation via search.
1163:
If there is to be an applied section then differential equations should definitely go in it, and so should discrete mathematics. However I don't think there should be such a section. The List of topics could be arranged so that it starts with the more pure-ish topics and then moves down the list to
786:
section). If you had expressed your opinion on the move, the page probably wouldn't have been moved as it was a close call according to the closing admin. Then after the move has been performed it appears you suddenly come forward with an opinion on the move, and you enforce it by overturning the
686:
There was no consensus at all for this move. The cited page on which the consensus was reached did not reach a consensus. And I didn't recognize even one name among those who commented there. HUNDREDS of daily
Knowledge editors have each edited HUNDREDS or (in my case and that of many others)
1263:
I said above that I thought "Discrete mathematics" is applied rather than pure, however "Discrete mathematics" does not seem to be a coherent field. It seems to be just the parts of various fields which are studied in computer science. Most of the fields: Number theory; game theory; logic;
1264:
information theory; probability; and dynamical systems contain both discrete and continuous parts, and all of them already have their own sections on this Lists page, except for combinatorics. So I think a combinatorics section should be there rather than a discrete section.
1086:
The ability to verify this "page" is of dubious utility as it is not an article. Not many readers are likely to want to check that that a list they are interested in has been perfectly described in the section title and the short section intro. Is that logic a case of
592:- many editors are unclear on the guidelines concerning cross-namespace links, and such links are subject to being deleted because of this. Moving lists of lists would require that the links to these pages be checked periodically to make sure they haven't been removed.
904:
I don't think it's a self-reference as such. A self-reference might be "Knowledge's table of contents", which would not make sense if the content were forked. This article is essentially, "This section's table of contents" which is on par in my mind with
Knowledge
604:- they'd be part of the portals they are subpages of, which are covered by featured portals. This could lead to confusion and conflict. Could portal subpages attain featured status independently of the portals they belonged to? My guess would be "no".
1160:"There is no consensus of what the various branches of applied mathematics are. Such categorizations are made difficult by the way mathematics and science change over time, and also by the way universities organize departments, courses, and degrees."
89:
108:
1215:
fields where they belong, I think most mathematicians, if asked to classify these 13 fields as either pure or applied, would reproduce the exact same subdivision. I don't agree that
Discrete mathematics should go under
127:
702:
Just so this won't be misleading: that other page on which it is claimed that a "broad consensus" was reached mentioned this issue only twice, tangentially. I'm not sure it ever mentioned this page specifically.
737:
to work out where this sort of list belongs. If you feel so strongly about this issue, you should obviously request that the other lists mentioned by the
Transhumanist get moved back to article space.
1145:
At the moment, this article divides Fields of mathematics into 3 subdivisions: Basic, Advanced and
Applied. This makes no sense. It would make more sense to divide the advanced section into
1123:
361:
485:) is for reader-oriented portals that help readers find and browse through articles related to a specific subject. It also may contain links to encourage readers to contribute to relevant
687:
THOUSANDS of mathematics articles, and they didn't participate in the discussion. We should broadly canvas to solicit opinions of those hundreds of mathematicians who edit here.
528:
1286:, which IMO belongs to the realm of discrete mathematics), and does not form an organic whole – but is still a useful category for navigational purposes. I would also put
459:
387:
756:
This is a situation I'd have preferred not to have: the closing admin / uninvolved party interpreting and taking a decision, and then have that decision overturned by an
1257:
1221:
598:- many mirrors and forks don't include portal pages - so these lists wouldn't be part of the main encyclopedia anymore, as they would no longer be considered articles.
1568:
1564:
1550:
787:
decision of the closing admin. Leaving us with a closed poll and a closing rationale (given by the closing admin) that doesn't match the position of the page.
1225:
1203:. The main point of having these categories is the ease of navigation. Lumping 6 + 7 = 13 fields together makes navigation harder. I favour instead changing
643:" (all of which are lists of lists). Note that Francis Schonken boldly moved those lists to portal space without prior discussion, citing that they defied
1655:
351:
1640:
250:
1650:
1630:
1067:
This list is obviously a useful navigational tool. I don't care whether it is a featured list or not (what difference does that make to anything ?)
733:
As
Francis notes, he made an effort to solicit opinions, and the requested move has been open for some time. There has been a discussion ongoing at
609:
Moving lists of lists out of the namespace they support is a bad idea. This is a policy or guideline concern, and belongs at the village pump.
772:
327:
256:
1091:?; good heavens no -- its simply that this is a list of lists - its a meta-meta page - I havent seen guidelines for those yet. for example,
44:. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page and why it was removed. If it has improved again to
1645:
1459:
573:
922:
49:
1635:
1546:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
712:
704:
318:
279:
226:
45:
41:
434:, that the broad consensus is that this should not be in article space. Therefore, I will change my mind and close this as a
1418:
1037:
1611:
1096:
628:
532:
168:
778:
Michael, you had all opportunity to express your opinion on the move, instead, above you asked a question (BTW in the "
675:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
406:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
1520:
1054:
1021:
962:
893:
816:
There was no consensus for a move on this page, and the discussion was properly closed with a "no consensus" notice.
451:
222:
218:
213:
193:
1443:
Wonder what was meant here, don't want to change unless original editor lets us know what he/she was trying to say.
806:
647:, but he misinterpretted that guideline. For them to be moved back to the main namespace would require an admin.
478:
466:(I'm not even sure that namespace existed at the time). Then there was a move without apparent discussion in 2006:
1352:
I've just realized that
Discrete mathematics is listed under areas of basic mathematics. I think it's fine there.
1476:
It's a good joke, but I'm not sure it should be presented to readers. I've commented it out, for the moment. —
640:
31:
1567:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
636:
53:
1536:
820:
The proper thing for the closing admin to have done if he wanted to change his mind later would be to start a
455:
1260:
to the dynamical systems section even though
Differential dynamical systems may be an extension of calculus.
1602:
1528:
988:
844:
829:
767:
745:
734:
720:
692:
624:
442:
431:
420:
1524:
1489:
1480:
1050:
1017:
958:
918:
818:
I did not overturn the decision of the closing admin; what I did leaves intact the "no consensus" outcome.
648:
632:
610:
486:
17:
1586:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1574:
1448:
802:
545:
494:
174:
1527:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1220:. The categorization of partial differential equations is indeed problematic; it is a bit curious that
304:
1467:
1199:
does not make eminent sense. I don't think, though, that the best solution is to abolish the category
1108:
898:
509:
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
1356:
1337:
1295:
1279:
470:
1099:
pages, and I have never seen a ref on any of them, and I would vehemently oppose them having a ref.
1320:
1154:
1076:
474:
463:
326:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1463:
1312:
1009:
984:
840:
825:
742:
716:
688:
557:
439:
417:
310:
1571:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
294:
273:
1587:
1477:
1380:
1303:
1269:
1248:
1229:
1169:
1131:
1041:
913:
1444:
1399:
1340:
isn't so much a topic as a way of looking at mathematics. Since it is everything that isn't
1283:
1104:
1594:
839:
I would add that there's nothing resembling a "broad consensus" at that other page either.
1497:
1414:
1282:
is negatively defined as mathematics not requiring the notion of continuity (but see e.g.
1092:
954:
569:
867:
The listed items are
Knowledge constructs, and while that is allowed under the guideline
1616:
1501:
1483:
1471:
1452:
1433:
1403:
1384:
1324:
1306:
1273:
1232:
1173:
1135:
1080:
1058:
1044:
1025:
992:
966:
948:
927:
848:
833:
810:
748:
724:
696:
651:
613:
560:
548:
497:
445:
423:
1553:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1316:
1072:
1013:
871:, it causes a collision with Knowledge's mandatory sourcing requirements in the policy
868:
416:; the other pages listed below by the Transhumanist will be returned to article space.
1593:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1624:
1428:
1088:
943:
909:
887:
880:
872:
855:
644:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1291:
1265:
1165:
1127:
1119:
821:
798:
791:
738:
490:
1421:
should redirect here. Let's consolidate the discussion on that other page. — Carl
1095:
doesnt have cites either. Feel free to write a guideline, as there are a lot of
1560:
1395:
1311:
Set theory is not really logic, in the general sense of that word, but it *is* "
1100:
323:
1559:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1493:
1287:
300:
205:
187:
1537:
https://web.archive.org/web/20061003233339/http://jmp.aip.org/jmp/staff.jsp
489:". Note also that the current page name (in plural) is not consistent with
1424:
1341:
939:
1164:
more applied-ish topics, but there shouldn't be any hard dividing line.
473:. I think Portal namespace suits very well here, per the description at
458:— There are some previous discussions on where to move this page in the
1359:
article for inspiration, perhaps the Logic section should be renamed
1184:
794:
in the other direction if you thought more people could have joined.
602:
As portal subpages, would they still be eligible for featured status?
957:. Or alternatively, establish an exception for this kind of list.
400:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal.
1540:
1241:
OK agreed, pure and applied headings are a useful navigational aid.
556:
What would be the affect on the fact that this is a Featured List?
1299:
741:
was, and is, the right venue to get moves you dislike overturned.
669:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.
1188:
790:
The proper thing for you to do would have been initiating a new
763:
Note that yesterday I still invited mathematics people to join:
150:
682:
No consensus at all was reached on this move. This is bogus.
1344:, it includes parts of just about every area of mathematics.
773:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mathematics#Stalled_move_request
1531:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1124:
Knowledge talk:Move navigational lists to portal namespace
225:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
1036:
Do you also see a verifiability problem with the article
1071:
this is a first step towards an AFD nomination. Is it ?
1180:
1179:
Although this subdivision has been stable since it was
1122:
would move this list back to the portal namespace, see
782:" section, while questions are more appropriate in the
623:- this appears to be an extension of the discussion at
467:
462:, but that was apparently before considering a move to
120:
101:
82:
1363:
and then logic and set theory would be fine there and
1458:
I think it's meant as a tongue-in-cheek reference to
1375:
could be put under algebra or given its own section.
715:
did not participate here when it seemed unnecessary.
322:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1563:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
531:, please explain your reasons, taking into account
388:Talk:Lists of mathematics topics/Archive 2004-2005
255:This article has not yet received a rating on the
711:page, but not of the other one. Participants in
1390:list of math history and math philosphy journals
1258:List of nonlinear partial differential equations
1222:List of nonlinear partial differential equations
1049:No, that's essentially a disambiguation page.
1549:This message was posted before February 2018.
1153:tag altogether. To quote from the article on
8:
1226:List of partial differential equation topics
768:Portal_talk:Mathematics#Stalled_move_request
912:, but I don't even think it's needed here.
217:, an attempt to structure and organize all
1519:I have just modified one external link on
1224:is put under "Calculus and analysis", but
529:polling is not a substitute for discussion
430:It seems, after reading the discussion at
268:
182:
156:
154:
61:
26:
18:Talk:List of lists of mathematical topics
799:WP:RM#Incomplete and contested proposals
221:. If you wish to help, please visit the
1298:; I think they are misclassified under
596:No longer part of the main encyclopedia
270:
184:
1256:It would thus seem reasonable to move
1211:. While there may be no consensus for
936:What would you like to verify? — Carl
983:Would you support such an exception?
797:I'll mention the contentious move at
568:-- Lists of lists are articles. See
7:
1460:Gödel's first incompleteness theorem
316:This article is within the scope of
211:This article is within the scope of
1439:We can help by making inconsistent?
574:Knowledge:Lists (stand-alone lists)
173:It is of interest to the following
1394:It may be helpful to develop one.
707:was notified of the discussion on
25:
1656:Top-priority mathematics articles
1523:. Please take a moment to review
861:This article doesn't have sources
713:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
705:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
336:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
1641:Unknown-importance List articles
1541:http://jmp.aip.org/jmp/staff.jsp
1149:, however I favour removing the
908:I have no problem with invoking
469:. Compare ongoing discussion at
339:Template:WikiProject Mathematics
303:
293:
272:
204:
186:
155:
30:
1651:List-Class mathematics articles
1631:Knowledge former featured lists
1012:seems to be onto a solution at
783:
412:The result of the proposal was
356:This article has been rated as
128:Featured list removal candidate
1228:under "Dynamical systems". Â --
590:Cross-namespace link conflicts
533:Knowledge's naming conventions
1:
1419:Lists of mathematics articles
1141:Proposed changes to this List
1109:14:49, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
1081:12:48, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
1059:11:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
1045:01:02, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
1026:12:08, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
993:15:26, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
967:12:08, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
949:23:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
928:23:35, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
899:22:19, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
849:15:15, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
834:14:45, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
811:07:59, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
749:12:54, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
725:06:43, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
697:04:15, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
652:20:08, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
614:19:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
561:01:55, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
549:00:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
521:, then sign your comment with
498:00:31, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
446:00:53, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
424:00:18, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
330:and see a list of open tasks.
1136:03:45, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
955:Knowledge:Lists#List content
629:Portal:Lists of basic topics
1617:15:12, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
1521:Lists of mathematics topics
1502:21:25, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
1385:16:46, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
1325:00:02, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
1307:23:35, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
1274:15:15, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
1233:23:15, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
1191:, I agree that contrasting
1174:10:49, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
853:
779:
491:WP:NC#Prefer singular nouns
452:Lists of mathematics topics
235:Knowledge:WikiProject Lists
38:Lists of mathematics topics
1672:
1646:WikiProject Lists articles
1580:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1516:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1472:04:24, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
1409:Discussion on organization
1038:List of '2007 in' articles
854:This article doesn't pass
475:Knowledge:namespace#Portal
257:project's importance scale
238:Template:WikiProject Lists
1484:20:12, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
1453:18:44, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
1434:17:49, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
641:Portal:List of glossaries
355:
288:
254:
199:
181:
141:
64:
60:
1636:List-Class List articles
1404:12:20, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
1118:A proposal currently on
953:Every listed item. See
672:Please do not modify it.
664:Any additional comments:
637:Portal:List of overviews
627:concerning the 4 pages "
456:Portal:Mathematics/Lists
403:Please do not modify it.
362:project's priority scale
52:the article to become a
1512:External links modified
879:Should an exception to
735:Knowledge talk:Contents
625:Knowledge talk:Contents
432:Knowledge talk:Contents
319:WikiProject Mathematics
219:list pages on Knowledge
109:Featured list candidate
90:Featured list candidate
633:Portal:Lists of topics
163:This article is rated
46:featured list standard
1114:Another move proposal
1561:regular verification
1357:Areas of mathematics
1338:Discrete mathematics
1296:Discrete mathematics
1280:Discrete mathematics
1247:Here's a quote from
471:Knowledge talk:Lists
414:no consensus to move
342:mathematics articles
144:Former featured list
42:former featured list
1551:After February 2018
1155:applied mathematics
863:for obvious reasons
1605:InternetArchiveBot
1556:InternetArchiveBot
1413:There is a thread
1313:mathematical logic
311:Mathematics portal
169:content assessment
65:Article milestones
1581:
1432:
1249:Dynamical systems
1051:The Transhumanist
1018:The Transhumanist
959:The Transhumanist
947:
926:
895:The Transhumanist
649:The Transhumanist
611:The Transhumanist
460:talk page archive
376:
375:
372:
371:
368:
367:
267:
266:
263:
262:
214:WikiProject Lists
149:
148:
137:
136:
121:December 31, 2007
16:(Redirected from
1663:
1615:
1606:
1579:
1578:
1557:
1422:
1371:could be added.
1284:Scott continuity
1147:Pure and Applied
937:
916:
803:Francis Schonken
674:
546:Francis Schonken
525:
519:
513:
495:Francis Schonken
479:portal namespace
464:portal namespace
405:
344:
343:
340:
337:
334:
313:
308:
307:
297:
290:
289:
284:
276:
269:
243:
242:
239:
236:
233:
208:
201:
200:
190:
183:
166:
160:
159:
158:
151:
142:Current status:
123:
104:
102:October 27, 2005
85:
62:
34:
27:
21:
1671:
1670:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1621:
1620:
1609:
1604:
1572:
1565:have permission
1555:
1529:this simple FaQ
1514:
1441:
1411:
1392:
1355:Looking to the
1143:
1116:
1101:John Vandenberg
1093:Lists of people
859:
684:
679:
670:
660:
570:Knowledge:Lists
523:
517:
511:
505:
401:
395:
381:
341:
338:
335:
332:
331:
309:
302:
282:
240:
237:
234:
231:
230:
167:on Knowledge's
164:
119:
100:
81:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1669:
1667:
1659:
1658:
1653:
1648:
1643:
1638:
1633:
1623:
1622:
1599:
1598:
1591:
1544:
1543:
1535:Added archive
1513:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1440:
1437:
1417:about whether
1410:
1407:
1391:
1388:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1236:
1235:
1142:
1139:
1115:
1112:
1084:
1083:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
996:
995:
974:
973:
972:
971:
970:
969:
931:
930:
906:
883:be made here?
858:
852:
837:
836:
776:
775:
770:
758:involved party
754:
753:
752:
751:
743:Angus McLellan
728:
727:
683:
680:
678:
677:
666:
659:
656:
655:
654:
617:
616:
607:
606:
605:
599:
593:
587:
578:
577:
563:
551:
544:(nominator) --
538:
537:
512:*'''Support'''
504:
501:
449:
448:
440:Angus McLellan
418:Angus McLellan
409:
408:
396:
394:
393:Requested move
391:
380:
377:
374:
373:
370:
369:
366:
365:
354:
348:
347:
345:
328:the discussion
315:
314:
298:
286:
285:
277:
265:
264:
261:
260:
253:
247:
246:
244:
209:
197:
196:
191:
179:
178:
172:
161:
147:
146:
139:
138:
135:
134:
131:
124:
116:
115:
112:
105:
97:
96:
93:
86:
78:
77:
74:
71:
67:
66:
58:
57:
35:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1668:
1657:
1654:
1652:
1649:
1647:
1644:
1642:
1639:
1637:
1634:
1632:
1629:
1628:
1626:
1619:
1618:
1613:
1608:
1607:
1596:
1592:
1589:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1576:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1552:
1547:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1530:
1526:
1522:
1517:
1511:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1482:
1479:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1438:
1436:
1435:
1430:
1426:
1420:
1416:
1408:
1406:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1389:
1387:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1353:
1343:
1339:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1261:
1259:
1254:
1251:
1250:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1234:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1161:
1158:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1140:
1138:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1113:
1111:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1065:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1034:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1010:Michael Hardy
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
994:
990:
986:
985:Phil Sandifer
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
977:
976:
975:
968:
964:
960:
956:
952:
951:
950:
945:
941:
935:
934:
933:
932:
929:
924:
920:
915:
911:
907:
903:
902:
901:
900:
897:
896:
891:
889:
884:
882:
877:
876:
874:
870:
864:
857:
851:
850:
846:
842:
841:Michael Hardy
835:
831:
827:
826:Michael Hardy
823:
819:
815:
814:
813:
812:
808:
804:
800:
795:
793:
788:
785:
781:
774:
771:
769:
766:
765:
764:
761:
759:
750:
747:
744:
740:
736:
732:
731:
730:
729:
726:
722:
718:
717:Michael Hardy
714:
710:
706:
701:
700:
699:
698:
694:
690:
689:Michael Hardy
681:
676:
673:
667:
665:
662:
661:
657:
653:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
630:
626:
622:
619:
618:
615:
612:
608:
603:
600:
597:
594:
591:
588:
585:
582:
581:
580:
579:
575:
571:
567:
564:
562:
559:
558:Michael Hardy
555:
552:
550:
547:
543:
540:
539:
536:
534:
530:
522:
518:*'''Oppose'''
516:
510:
507:
506:
502:
500:
499:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
465:
461:
457:
453:
447:
444:
441:
437:
433:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
422:
419:
415:
407:
404:
398:
397:
392:
390:
389:
385:
378:
363:
359:
353:
350:
349:
346:
329:
325:
321:
320:
312:
306:
301:
299:
296:
292:
291:
287:
281:
278:
275:
271:
258:
252:
249:
248:
245:
241:List articles
228:
224:
220:
216:
215:
210:
207:
203:
202:
198:
195:
192:
189:
185:
180:
176:
170:
162:
153:
152:
145:
140:
132:
130:
129:
125:
122:
118:
117:
113:
111:
110:
106:
103:
99:
98:
94:
92:
91:
87:
84:
80:
79:
75:
72:
69:
68:
63:
59:
55:
54:featured list
51:
47:
43:
39:
36:
33:
29:
28:
19:
1603:
1600:
1575:source check
1554:
1548:
1545:
1518:
1515:
1478:Arthur Rubin
1442:
1412:
1393:
1373:Order theory
1369:model theory
1365:proof theory
1360:
1354:
1351:
1292:Order theory
1262:
1255:
1252:
1246:
1217:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1162:
1159:
1150:
1146:
1144:
1117:
1085:
1068:
914:CRGreathouse
894:
892:
890:apply here?
885:
878:
866:
862:
860:
838:
817:
796:
789:
777:
762:
757:
755:
708:
685:
671:
668:
663:
620:
601:
595:
589:
583:
565:
553:
541:
526:
520:
514:
508:
487:WikiProjects
482:
450:
438:as request.
435:
413:
411:
410:
402:
399:
383:
382:
358:Top-priority
357:
317:
283:Top‑priority
223:project page
212:
175:WikiProjects
143:
126:
107:
95:Not promoted
88:
83:June 9, 2005
37:
1445:Pdecalculus
1361:Foundations
1097:"Lists of "
905:categories.
784:#Discussion
584:No searches
333:Mathematics
324:mathematics
280:Mathematics
1625:Categories
1612:Report bug
1490:removed it
1288:Set theory
1181:introduced
658:Discussion
227:discussion
165:List-class
50:renominate
48:, you may
1595:this tool
1588:this tool
1488:And I've
1317:Trovatore
1073:Gandalf61
1601:Cheers.—
1342:analysis
1205:Advanced
1193:Advanced
639:", and "
554:Question
527:. Since
481:(prefix
384:Archives
379:Untitled
114:Promoted
1525:my edit
1377:Delaszk
1304:Lambiam
1266:Delaszk
1230:Lambiam
1218:Applied
1201:Applied
1197:Applied
1166:Delaszk
1151:applied
1128:Andrewa
1042:Lambiam
1014:WP:FLRC
869:WP:SRTA
780:#Survey
621:Comment
483:Portal:
477:: "The
360:on the
133:Demoted
73:Process
1481:(talk)
1464:DilumA
1396:Tkuvho
1294:under
1185:June 9
1089:WP:IAR
1069:unless
910:WP:IAR
888:WP:IAR
881:WP:VER
873:WP:VER
856:WP:VER
746:(Talk)
645:WP:ASR
503:Survey
443:(Talk)
421:(Talk)
171:scale.
76:Result
1494:dcljr
1302:. Â --
1300:Logic
1195:with
1120:WP:RM
1040:? Â --
886:Does
822:WP:RM
792:WP:RM
232:Lists
194:Lists
40:is a
1498:talk
1492:. -
1468:talk
1449:talk
1429:talk
1415:here
1400:talk
1381:talk
1367:and
1321:talk
1290:and
1270:talk
1209:Pure
1189:2005
1170:talk
1132:talk
1105:talk
1077:talk
1055:talk
1022:talk
989:talk
963:talk
944:talk
845:talk
830:talk
807:talk
801:. --
739:This
721:talk
709:this
693:talk
635:", "
631:", "
572:and
566:Keep
542:Move
524:~~~~
436:move
70:Date
1569:RfC
1539:to
1425:CBM
1213:all
1207:to
1183:on
1016:.
940:CBM
865:.
352:Top
251:???
1627::
1582:.
1577:}}
1573:{{
1500:)
1470:)
1462:.
1451:)
1427:·
1402:)
1383:)
1323:)
1272:)
1187:,
1172:)
1157::
1134:)
1126:.
1107:)
1079:)
1057:)
1024:)
991:)
965:)
942:·
921:|
847:)
832:)
824:.
809:)
760:.
723:)
695:)
515:or
454:→
386::
1614:)
1610:(
1597:.
1590:.
1496:(
1466:(
1447:(
1431:)
1423:(
1398:(
1379:(
1319:(
1268:(
1168:(
1130:(
1103:(
1075:(
1053:(
1020:(
987:(
961:(
946:)
938:(
925:)
923:c
919:t
917:(
875:.
843:(
828:(
805:(
719:(
691:(
535:.
493:—
364:.
259:.
229:.
177::
56:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
