1074:, which enables incorporation of local governments (i.e. municipalities) in the province, is long in the tooth. Upon review, it dates back to at least 1973 and possibly further back to 1967. It is evident that, back then, there were only three different status types of municipalities – cities, towns and villages – with different incorporation requirements. In 2005, the Act was amended to provide the opportunity to pursue a fourth incorporated local government or municipal status type – rural community. In 2013, it was amended again to enable a fifth incorporated local government or municipal status type – regional municipality. Thus there are five status types enabled by the
630:, as it is not directly related to the list in question. As another user pointed out "If we are going to start including financials, then where does it end? Number of employees? Kilometre lengths of roads, water pipes, sewers, etc.?". Also the table was very confusing and included numbers with no definition of what the numbers meant outside of the text, and also contained bare links to pdfs. It will also make this article quite a bit different in form and style to all the other provinces/state list of local government pages. I think if this information is to stay on wikipedia, it could be given it's own article "
2243:
instead of replacing or editing the existing table, simply adding a second table that lists the post-reform municipalities. More specifically, it would simply share the first four columns of the existing table but exclude the final five columns because no census data is available. This means the existing table goes untouched other than branding it as the pre-reform list of municipalities. I will implement this at some point. Once the 2026 census results come out in early 2027, we can return to having just one table. Happy to receive feedback on this suggestion in the meantime. Cheers,
198:
264:
304:
21:
353:
332:
122:
363:
455:
437:
58:
550:
529:
188:
153:
2052:. The gnomes then only have to update the template once every five years in one location rather than updating in three different tables every five years. Compound this across all provinces and territories and their statuses, a huge load would be lifted. This is something I want to do, though I have never created a template before and am not familiar with its necessary additional coding.
2628:
map, highway maps, maps in the previous regulatons defining LSDs, municipalities, rural communities, and
Tracadie all show that almost every single boundary in the province was changed, even in cases where no change is noted in the text. There's avoidance of original research and then there's sticking one's head in the sand like the proverbial ostrich and pretending nothing happened.
284:
465:
786:, would a change of title of the present article from "List of municipalities in New Brunswick" to "Municipalities in New Brunswick" help you overcome your difficulty? That way we could have sections on "list of" and "municipal finance" all on one page. The benefit would be that we wouldn't need to grow our "see also" list, for example at
2627:
Whatever. The fact remains that any municipality other than those should not be noted as unaffected because the regulation only noted changes when they affected populated areas. Call it original research or whatever epithet you wish, a simple visual comparison of the new municipal maps with electoral
2355:
I am of the opinion that @g Walton will continue to have a alternative motive (perhaps political or bureaucratic), and I would like to develop a test for this theory by requesting a consensus involving the community of contributors. But in the meantime, I am asking that a simple and current list of
2795:
for transclusion, but it looks like the end of the section is never detected and the balance of the article is transcluded instead -- disrupting the rest of the referencing article. I believe this used to work correctly, but I don't think there's a good way to figure out what change may have caused
2604:
The 14 municipalities above that were continued as they existed already have the note stating "The 2023 local governance reform did not affect Foo." I am doubtful there is a source that verifies "where the boundaries were only slightly affected—no longer cutting across properties" and/or "these are
2101:
Very interesting. Could you sandbox a quick and dirty template showing how the API/JSON routine accesses StatCan data to enable this non-programmer’s understanding? Also, some questions about parameters. In my mind I have parameters that toggle on and off rows within the table template based on the
1610:
To recap, Cornellier sees it as three types (bolded in light grey cells) based on legislated definitions whereas I see it as five types, or three types where one type has three sub-types, based on how municipalities are generally synonymous with local governments in Canada (italicized in light grey
1046:
Okay. Thanks for the clarity. I'm going to revert your edits for the time being to allow investigation into this and further discussion to seek consensus, given this article's featured list status and how the edits you've made makes this list article inconsistent with the 10 other featured lists of
649:
I am the other user quoted above and I agree the recently added (and since deleted) information is too granular and not relevant to this list. Its placement front and centre before the list of the municipalities themselves certainly was not helpful and gave this trivial information more weight than
2031:
I think the best solution to take the load off gnomes from having to update with, for example, new census info that would need to be repeated on two or more articles of slightly different scope is to build a template. Say you build the above table for all CSDs in NB as a template instead. It could
2656:
Calculating 2021 population solely on municipalities affected is misleading in many cases due to the number of LSDs included. The 2021 census figures now list many of them with their parish CSDs and they should be included in calculations, marking those that are impossible to calculate due to the
2242:
At some point, someone is going to be bold by editing the table that lists all municipalities to match the outcome of the recent local governance reforms. This would be problematic because we have no amended census data for those municipalities that experienced boundary changes. My suggestion is,
723:
page. This page is just a list with very basic demographic information, and that's it. Any addition would be trivial relative to the purpose of this list. Should we add another section on number of lakes? Hospitals? Schools? There are separate pages for many of those. It doesn't make sense to put
2258:
Sounds reasonable but the first table would need an introductory note stating the the second table exists. I've already had to revert a couple of bad edits elsewhere that stated a former municipality was now included in the census data for a neighbouring rural CSD without bothering to adjust the
2174:
Interesting how rural communities and regional municipalities are now properly nested alongside the other three types. The province corrected its unintentional semantics error introduced in the 2000s this time around, at least on the GNB page. The page still isn’t perfect however as there is no
1639:
sums up the two competing categorizations. I understand where the 3 categories (with 3 sub categories) comes from, however to prevent confusion with the very title of this article, I recommend keeping the organization as we have it, with a comment mentioning that New
Brunswick categorizes cities
1194:
Yes. This goes back to my long in the tooth comment. When the Act was amended in 2005 and again in 2013, the definition of 'municipality' should have been amended to "means a city, town, village, rural community or rural municipality", or re-termed as "'urban municipality' means a city, town or
808:
I still don't think it's wise to include two completely different topics in a single page. But thankfully Hwy43 made a great alternative, and I think all the data you inputted deserves it's own page, specifically because municipal finance is a distinct subject. For the same reason we also don't
2315:
are published annually, usually in the fall. It will either be reflected in this year’s forthcoming list or, due to the volumes of changes, next year’s list. For all the recent changes in PEI, it wasn’t until the second edition after the effective dates of the changes that the adjustments were
2070:
I like your template idea. I'll take a crack at developing one. Templates do take parameters, so it's conceivable that all of the, say, census data for a province could live in one template, and then be displayed as a subset on the page for a county or city. That template could even be built
1319:
I understand and really like the preferred format used for MB. If the GoNB and/or the Act explicitly differentiated the three original types as 'urban municipalities' instead of the ambiguous 'municipalities', I'd be all-in immediately like done for MB as well as SK and AB. However, if we do
956:
Unless I missed something what you said is exactly reflected in the lead: "Approximately one-third of the residents of New
Brunswick do not live in municipalities but reside in local service districts, which are unincorporated communities administered by the Minister of Environment and Local
1613:
Ultimately, we are tasked with determining if the organization of the list article should fully match the legislative hierarchy/definitions or what is generally understood in the
Canadian context. If there is consensus to do the former, I have put some thought together on how to do so while
2219:
If you are referring to the table at the top of this thread, CSD type remains the proper column title due to the presence of reserves (and we are assuming StatCan will create the new CSD type of rural districts, which will eventually be confirmed once StatCan’s interim list publishes the
2330:
A second response from StatsCan: "The next release for New
Brunswick (NB) census data based on the new municipal boundaries effective January 2023 would be included in the release of the Census of Population 2026 data. At this time, Census 2026 release dates have not been determined."
979:
As LSDs are unincorporated communities and the scope of this article are incorporated communities (i.e. municipalities), what we have here on this article, as amended by
Mattximus, is appropriate. A list article inclusive of both incorporated and unincorporated communities would be
1640:
towns and villages as "municipalities" distinct from regional and rural municipalities in the lead. I believe a line to this effect in the lead will allow us to keep the 5 categories and reduce confusion while still being true to the concerns raised above. This is just my 2 cents.
699:
but we need to arrive at a consensus-based solution. I'll create a sandbox for us to paste the reverted content and collaboratively craft it so that it can be laced into the article. I'll return in a couple hours to set that up once I have an extended period of free time. Cheers,
2679:
please remove the final column. It is original research and in many cases incorrect as explained by GTW. Also please apply proper references to all remaining columns. This is a featured list. A bare bones reference with just a url in the title of the table is not sufficient.
2589:
There, that's all. Maybe a note stating that "these are the only municipalities whose census population data should be unaffected" would be the most accurate way of putting it. Campobello Island is probably the only municipality that had no boundary adjustments at all.
2106:, there would be parameters that: toggle on columns for 2011 population, percent change, population density, and incorporation date; toggle off the governance and county columns; and change the "CSD type" heading to read "Municipality type" or simply "Type"? Cheers,
672:
definition, unless someone can point to a bullet point on that list. I'll place it *after* the list of municipalities themselves, as per Hwy43. I accept that we do things differently in NB, and hope that other
Canadians can accept wiki as a tool for diverse people.
2532:
Not quite. I was thinking of places where the boundaries were only slightly affected—no longer cutting across properties, for example—and not worth noting in the
Regulation other than showing up on the new maps. A single shared footnote or cell colour should
1761:(e.g. the New Brunswick, Canadian community, and Canadian geography WikiProjects weren’t notified). I might RfC two or all three of them in future with additional detailed content on current towns/villages, lists and details about former towns/villages, etc.
2293:
I sent an email to StatsCan asking if there's a release date for data based on the new municipal boundaries. The response: "The data you are requesting is not available as a standard product. However, it may be available through a custom order (fees may
1312:
The consequence is we get casual readers asking questions like "does this mean rural communities and regional municipalities aren't municipalities?"; "if so, why are they even mentioned in this article?"; etc. At the end of the day, how many types of
100:
35:
650:
the most relevant and important information in the list article. Not sure if its own article is warranted either. Research should be undertaken to determine if precedent articles have been created along the same vein before boldly creating one.
1214:
1087:
2631:
Change the footnotes to "the text of the regulation did not mentioned any change in boundaries" or whatever. Strip off the absurd and misleading footnotes that such-and-such was unaffected except for annexing some unincorporated areas.
1532:. This means that they are not synonymous according to New Brunswick legislation, so I now understand, more than previously, where Cornellier is coming from. Rather, "local government" is an umbrella term above "municipality" instead.
1399:
The second idea can't work because villages are not urban. You asked "how many types of incorporated municipalities, as the concept generally known and understood by society, exist in NB?" Well the NB government answers that at
848:? Need new entry in the table for this new rural community, plus removal of four villages. Prose in the Rural community and Village sections would also require updating, as well as likely the overall article lead. Cheers,
1266:
If we think about the casual readers that visit this article that aren't as knowledgeable as us about the intricacies of municipalities in NB, the following article heading organization would create further confusion.
2029:, but I have more work to do. I am currently researching former municipalities by every status across every province and territory so that I can start integrating more former municipalities in each sub-list article.
2102:
scope of article. Can parameters also toggle on and off columns in the template? Can they also switch the names of column headings? Using your quick table above as an example in relation to the current table at
2878:
1683:, and a desire to keep things simple. But as has been pointed out, the term "municipality" is overloaded. Also, the term "village", "town", "city" often make up part of a municipality's official name. So
932:
Anybody (1/3 of the population) not in one of the three above types is in an LSD, administered by the
Minister of Environment and Local Government. This should be made clear in the prose, and a linked to
2716:
At a glance, it looks like types of communities and census data both appear in multiple citations. Could somebody with the time and inclination do whatever updates and mergers are necessary? Thanks.
1970:
Might not be too onerous to build the first time if I take a CSV file from the governement site and do a scripted transform into a wikitable. Obviously this will create more maintenance work for the
1754:
1264:
As mentioned, their semantics on the webpage, which is consistent with their semantics in the dated Act that has a definition that hasn't been updated properly, has created this current confusion.
1484:
Also, the provincial government itself is inconsistent in stating in press releases and web documents whether rural municipalities and the regional municipality are distinct from municipalities.
2079:
of a place, then fire off a query to statcan to retrieve pop data. We do something like this when we add {{Coord}} to {{Infobox settlement}} and use that to build a map based off information at
941:. I suggest that the page be organized to reflect that. I gives undue weight to the distinction (which is what?) between towns, villages, and cities, and should give some context about LSDs. --
2873:
1082:
make this confusing. It is evident that the spirit and intent is that there are five different municipal status types providing local government in the province, and such is acknowledged by
746:
2759:#1 and #7 should not be merged as #7 cannot verify "eighth-most populous" and "third-smallest province by land area". #1 on the other hand can verify as it lists all provinces in Canada.
2071:
programmatically once every five years by parsing a downloaded data set from statcan. Here's another idea: Statistics Canada has exposed all 2016 census data for a geo of interest via an
790:, and we needn't have a sentence like "For a list, see the list page" on the muni finance page, and vice-versa. Growth of redirection link is also an evil to be avoided. But I do like
2087:
for an example of how I did that. Ideal long-term solution? Those are hard to come by in the ever-changing world of IT, but I think this could be a fruitful line of investigation. --
2044:
communities). It would be built with invokable parameters to only display cities, towns, villages, rural communities and regional municipalities for use when placing the template on
888:
Ok I think I've updated the table and prose, the only hiccup is that I could not find the land area anywhere, but I did make a note of this in the table. Is there anything I missed?
2923:
2913:
719:
For me, the issue isn't the content that you are adding, I actually think it does belong on wikipedia, and deserves it's own page. My issue is that it doesn't really fit well in
1195:
village" to disambiguate from the two other types of municipalities introduced by these amendments decades later. The GoNB has therefore created this semantics-based confusion.
2371:
The idiom is ulterior motive and no, I don't have one. I'm quite open in my motive of trying to make information on our governance, past and present, accurate and accessible.
2277:
Subsection headings would negate the need for an introductory note. We aren’t writing a user manual. Articles shouldn’t have content that describes “how to” use the article.
1130:
1114:
965:
is also present in the see also section. I believe that covers it, no? I don't think there should be any details about LSD in the body as this is a list of municipalities.
2791:. Transclusion isn't working correctly at all, as both of these articles show duplicated sections and terrible layout. It seems like this article is meant to provide the
1654:
Agreed. A fine distinction that's meaningless or unknown to most people (even many who work in the field) gets in the way of usefulness when it comes to writing articles.
2888:
962:
938:
244:
1379:
As for LSDs, they are not incorporated municipalities, whereas LGDs in MB are incorporated municipalities. This is why LSDs are not included in this article. Cheers,
1224:
Yes. The feds therefore also see that there are truly five types of municipalities in NB (though they are missing the "Regional" prefix for
Tracadie's status type).
64:
2918:
2898:
2908:
2018:
1142:
745:, I have created a sandbox with two options. Each option includes my suggested edits, comments and requests for citations and clarifications. You can view it at
2948:
2495:
Do you think it would be reasonable to use some sort of markup in the table to indicate which municipalities weren't significantly affected by the reforms?
2903:
2745:#1 and #7 can be merged; add in #23 if you're willing to combine two sources in the same citation. I guess #5 and #9 are different enough to leave alone.
1176:
Thanks for the info, I was unaware that conformity with homologous articles of other provinces was a requirement. I'm proposing a layout like that of the
2375:
1102:
313:
171:
1614:
respecting the theme and approach applied across all provincial/territorial entries in the scope of the List of municipalities in Canada topic. Cheers,
2938:
2883:
419:
409:
293:
167:
2893:
1635:
I think for the average reader the most important thing would be to use what is generally understood in the Canadian context. I think the table by
2103:
2045:
1732:
1110:
254:
1680:
1401:
1243:
1083:
1079:
911:
2943:
1722:
1679:
Thanks for your thoughtful replies. I'll go with the flow. I suppose I was motivated by a (too?) literal interpretation of the NB Government's
1126:
958:
934:
604:
2963:
2953:
2928:
2075:
which responds with JSON. For any non-programmers reading this, it means that we could create a template which would take as a parameter the
2010:
1118:
594:
2828:
2784:
2033:
1078:
that all walk and talk like incorporated local governments (i.e. municipalities). It is unfortunate that semantics in both the Act and the
981:
764:
Wow, that was a lot of work put into that page. I strongly support option 2, primarily because each wikipedia page should have one focus.
668:
Thanks for the input. As with all novel ideas, it is encountering resistance. I certainly don't think the financial information meets the
2356:
municipalities and perhaps near municipalities in New Brunswick be established without accompanying paraphernalia. Questions? Seconder?
2968:
2933:
1758:
385:
273:
163:
1516:, it states "In Canada, municipalities are local governments established through provincial and territorial legislation...". The terms
1498:
I've observed the same in Alberta. Sometimes the provincial government says special areas, improvement districts, and Metis settlement
1177:
1106:
795:
809:
include list of river length per municipality, lakes per municipality, crime rates, etc... in this page. I would think a page titled
631:
2006:
1717:
1712:
1246:
clearly states that there are four types of local government: Municipalities, Regional Municipalities, rural communies, and LSDs. --
1134:
1122:
1098:
922:
495:
220:
1512:(LGA), I am going to try to re-articulate a different way to reveal that both Cornellier and I are correct in different ways. At
1146:
674:
570:
1418:
We should present it as the government does. Anything else, justified by not confusing the "casual reader", could be "violating
2958:
2049:
1839:
1750:
1138:
998:
Thanks for the quick feedback. My main point, which got obscured by LSDs, is that per the gov't the following entities exist:
1817:
376:
337:
1097:, see how it deviates from the standardized organization implemented for the equivalent featured lists of municipalities in
810:
478:
442:
211:
158:
133:
2750:
2721:
2662:
2637:
2595:
2500:
2471:
2434:
2383:
2336:
2302:
2264:
2206:
1670:
1489:
566:
562:
557:
534:
40:
2126:
2788:
1861:
2845:
Now fixed in both locations with additional fixes at the former, including the uncoupling of towns and villages.
1524:
are effectively synonymous in Canada. Drilling down however to the New Brunswick context, according to the LGA,
1032:
Cities towns and villages are all legally and functionally the same thing. This is not reflected in the page. --
2002:
1903:
724:
everything in one list. But we can link a new page from here for sure. Would that be an acceptable compromise?
30:
1047:
municipalities across Canada's other provinces and territories. Hopefully you can sit tight for a bit. Cheer,
626:
I reverted the recent addition of financial information for several reasons. First, it seems to run afoul of
1925:
799:
121:
20:
2746:
2717:
2658:
2633:
2591:
2496:
2467:
2445:
2430:
2393:
2379:
2332:
2298:
2260:
2202:
1666:
1485:
918:
Municipalities: cities, towns and villages, which are functionally the same and differ only in size AFAIK.
678:
2036:
in its entirety (your proposed table is most appropriate there because that list article's scope is both
749:. I look forward to your comments. The more I have thought about this, I am leaning to Option 2. Cheers,
57:
2854:
2840:
2823:
2808:
2768:
2754:
2740:
2725:
2703:
2689:
2666:
2641:
2622:
2599:
2523:
2504:
2475:
2457:
2438:
2423:
2405:
2387:
2365:
2340:
2325:
2306:
2286:
2268:
2252:
2229:
2210:
2184:
2175:
acknowledgement of reserves, which will be voids in the fabric of local govs/munis and rural districts.
2166:
2115:
2096:
2064:
1983:
1770:
1744:
1674:
1649:
1623:
1493:
1476:
1458:
1435:
1388:
1255:
1233:
1204:
1170:
1056:
1041:
993:
974:
950:
897:
872:
857:
822:
803:
773:
758:
733:
709:
682:
659:
643:
139:
44:
2799:
Does anyone have insight into the way transclusion was meant to work here, before it was disrupted? --
2076:
2453:
2419:
2401:
2361:
2162:
2092:
1979:
1740:
1506:. It is frustrating because we like to strive for things to be perfect and non-contradictory on here.
1472:
1431:
1251:
1037:
946:
738:
2674:
1974:
but that could be offset by removing one or two of the many other place lists that exist for NB. --
1657:
Rural communities and the regional municipality are quasi-municipalities but retitling the article
1645:
1464:
970:
893:
868:
818:
769:
729:
639:
494:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
384:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
219:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2804:
1994:
1990:
48:
1735:
for now. government_type could be populated with the same values except parish and county. --
1481:
I'll point out that the Municipalities Act was replaced by the Local Governance Act in 2017.
669:
627:
491:
263:
2850:
2836:
2819:
2764:
2736:
2699:
2685:
2618:
2610:
2605:
the only municipalities whose census population data should be unaffected". Such requires
2519:
2449:
2415:
2397:
2357:
2321:
2282:
2248:
2225:
2180:
2158:
2111:
2088:
2060:
1975:
1971:
1953:
1766:
1736:
1619:
1468:
1454:
1442:
1427:
1423:
1384:
1325:
1247:
1229:
1200:
1166:
1149:
that will eventually follow. To achieve the goal of making the "List of municipalities in
1052:
1033:
989:
942:
853:
754:
705:
655:
368:
303:
2312:
1509:
1158:
2378:
page, though I don't actually maintain that or this beyond fixing typos if I see them.
1641:
1446:
966:
889:
864:
845:
839:
814:
783:
765:
742:
725:
635:
2072:
1184:
1070:
362:
352:
331:
2867:
2800:
2080:
863:
Yep I can work on that this week no problem. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
787:
470:
203:
1753:. There were separate lists for towns, villages and rural communities but they were
2731:
What citations are you referring to? #1, #7 and #23 are similar but all different.
2606:
2021:. I've since taken initial steps of following the Alberta approach, taking it from
1513:
1419:
1321:
1314:
1154:
2466:
No. It should be about its history, its places, its people, and so on, and so on.
2001:
be expanded to be more than a duplicate by adding additional details. Look at how
1684:
1611:
cells). I hope the above helps understanding of where my concerns are coming from.
2694:
With no action, I have deleted the column myself now that I have some free time.
1526:"local government" means a municipality, rural community or regional municipality
928:
Rural community: is an incorporated community that has a locally elected council.
2084:
454:
436:
2005:
has much more additional content on towns than the main municipalities list at
1989:
I like your thought process but what that AfD discussion failed to consider is
2846:
2832:
2815:
2760:
2732:
2695:
2681:
2614:
2515:
2490:
2317:
2278:
2244:
2221:
2176:
2107:
2056:
1788:
1762:
1636:
1615:
1450:
1380:
1317:, as the concept generally known and understood by society, exist in NB? Five.
1225:
1196:
1162:
1048:
985:
883:
849:
844:
feel up to the task of updating this list article to reflect incorporation of
791:
779:
750:
701:
651:
460:
358:
193:
187:
152:
2374:
If you want a full list of current municipalities, you can find that on the
957:
Government and have no local government of their own". I've added a link to
549:
528:
2055:
What are your thoughts on that being an ideal long-term solution? Cheers,
1665:
seems to slide into the "distinction without a difference" logic fallacy.
381:
283:
2412:
2316:
published. It is assumed the delay was due to the volume of changes.
1791:. What do you think about having an all-encompassing list like this:
216:
2259:
numbers to new figures, which of course haven't been released yet.
1217:
groups municipalities together in one list, distinguished by type.
921:
Regional Municipalities: introduced in May 2013, so far just the
1659:
List of municipalities and quasi-municipalities in New Brunswick
487:
483:
634:" or something like that, but it does not belong in this list.
2831:
is fixed, though I disagree with them being bundled together.
2201:
are a different matter. The discussion below deals with this.
115:
2814:
I will take a peak. I think I know what went wrong and when.
2444:
Is a page about a community strictly about it's governance @
2133:
Local governments ("also commonly known as municipalities")
2048:, and then only the cities parameter invoked for display at
2009:. The proposed AfDer for the NB sub-lists has sights set on
1445:, I have put some further thought on this. Just waiting for
302:
282:
262:
1408:
municipalities: towns villages and cities according to size
1377:
inappropriate, I suggest this would be an ideal compromise.
747:
User:Hwy43/List of municipalities in New Brunswick/sandbox
569:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
1508:
Based on Timothy's advisement (thank you) about the new
1320:
institute the slightly adjusted below, are we violating
2879:
Featured lists that have appeared on the main page once
2829:
List of communities in New Brunswick#Towns and villages
2511:
2026:
2022:
2014:
1542:
1187:
states: "'municipality' means a city, town or village".
1094:
696:
93:
1749:
For City in the infobox you could alternately link to
2536:
Let me just check the Reg, and I'll give you a list.
2238:
Table adjustment due to 2023 local governance reforms
782:! I agree with a lot of your constructive criticism.
482:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
380:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
215:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2874:Featured lists that have appeared on the main page
63:This article appeared on Knowledge's Main Page as
1663:List of incorporated communities in New Brunswick
833:Update to reflect incorporation of Haut-Madawaska
963:List of local service districts in New Brunswick
939:List of local service districts in New Brunswick
961:in the lead though, that is a good suggestion.
632:Municipal debts of New Brunswick municipalities
2657:division of some LSDs by multiple new bodies.
2019:List of municipalities in Prince Edward Island
2924:High-importance Canadian communities articles
8:
2914:High-importance Geography of Canada articles
1530:"municipality" means a city, town or village
2484:Indicating communities unaffected by reform
2413:https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Valley_Waters
906:Legal types of local government in NB today
561:, an attempt to structure and organize all
2376:2023 New Brunswick local governance reform
1793:
523:
431:
326:
147:
72:
15:
2129:, the province is subdivided as follows:
1575:
1568:
1563:
1558:
1012:But the article says these types exist:
565:. If you wish to help, please visit the
2889:High-importance Canada-related articles
2104:List of municipalities in New Brunswick
2046:List of municipalities in New Brunswick
1733:List of municipalities in New Brunswick
1335:List of municipalities in New Brunswick
1274:List of municipalities in New Brunswick
695:Let's slow down a bit here. Pardon the
525:
433:
328:
149:
27:List of municipalities in New Brunswick
2919:FL-Class Canadian communities articles
2899:High-importance New Brunswick articles
1215:List of municipalities - New Brunswick
1145:featured list and the final remaining
959:Local service district (New Brunswick)
935:Local service district (New Brunswick)
2909:FL-Class Geography of Canada articles
2011:List of towns in Prince Edward Island
1997:, etc., and that sub-lists by status
1465:my related remarks at WikiProject_NB
914:, the following are legally defined:
622:The addition of financial information
119:
7:
2949:FL-Class WikiProject Cities articles
2785:List of communities in New Brunswick
2351:@g and list of municipalities proper
2034:List of communities in New Brunswick
1731:The first five will have to link to
1687:should be populated as follows (?):
1502:municipalities and other times they
984:, which could use some improvement.
982:List of communities in New Brunswick
555:This article is within the scope of
476:This article is within the scope of
374:This article is within the scope of
209:This article is within the scope of
2125:Note that as of 2023, according to
1549:Municipalities = local governments
1161:among all lists will be important.
1141:as well as the currently nominated
138:It is of interest to the following
47:. If you can update or improve it,
2904:WikiProject New Brunswick articles
1783:All-encompassing table or template
1178:List of municipalities in Manitoba
811:Municipal finance in New Brunswick
14:
2783:This article is transcluded from
2013:based on comments at the current
2007:List of municipalities in Alberta
923:Regional Municipality of Tracadie
2939:Low-importance politics articles
2884:FL-Class Canada-related articles
1373:If there is consensus that this
548:
527:
463:
453:
435:
361:
351:
330:
314:WikiProject Canadian communities
196:
186:
151:
120:
56:
19:
2894:FL-Class New Brunswick articles
2050:List of cities in New Brunswick
1751:List of cities in New Brunswick
910:Per this Government of NB page
599:This article has been rated as
414:This article has been rated as
294:WikiProject Geography of Canada
249:This article has been rated as
1947:Big Hole Tract 8 (South Half)
1554:In New Brunswick per its LGA:
394:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
1:
2944:WikiProject Politics articles
1661:would be absurd. Changing to
873:00:45, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
858:06:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
498:and see a list of open tasks.
397:Template:WikiProject Politics
388:and see a list of open tasks.
311:This article is supported by
291:This article is supported by
271:This article is supported by
223:and see a list of open tasks.
2964:Low-importance List articles
2954:All WikiProject Cities pages
2929:All WikiProject Canada pages
2341:17:43, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
2326:07:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
2307:01:16, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
2287:07:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
2269:09:06, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
2253:08:12, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
2230:07:40, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
2211:01:11, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
2185:07:40, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
2167:00:30, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
1594:
1589:
1584:
1153:" family of list articles a
504:Knowledge:WikiProject Cities
229:Knowledge:WikiProject Canada
2793:<section name=towns: -->
1315:incorporated municipalities
1242:This Government of NB page
898:21:43, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
579:Knowledge:WikiProject Lists
510:WikiProject Cities articles
507:Template:WikiProject Cities
232:Template:WikiProject Canada
2985:
2969:WikiProject Lists articles
2934:FL-Class politics articles
2789:List of villages in Canada
2690:05:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
2667:02:59, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
2505:00:52, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
2476:23:25, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
2458:21:11, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
2439:04:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
2424:04:19, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
2406:03:30, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
2388:01:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
2366:00:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
1681:Types of Local Governments
1402:Types of Local Governments
1244:Types of Local Governments
912:Types of Local Governments
605:project's importance scale
582:Template:WikiProject Lists
420:project's importance scale
255:project's importance scale
33:, which means it has been
2116:16:03, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
2097:14:21, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
2065:21:26, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
1984:13:25, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
1771:17:04, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
1759:satisfactory consultation
1745:16:28, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
1675:02:27, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
1650:19:17, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
1624:05:19, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
1553:
1548:
1494:02:55, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
1477:01:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
1459:01:00, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
1436:10:41, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
1389:22:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
1256:20:52, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
1234:22:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
1213:This Revenue Canada page
1205:22:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
1171:05:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
1057:03:19, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
1042:02:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
994:00:29, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
975:22:10, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
951:21:14, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
823:23:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
804:22:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
774:21:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
759:06:47, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
734:20:40, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
710:00:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
683:19:48, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
660:07:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
644:20:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
598:
543:
448:
413:
346:
310:
290:
274:WikiProject New Brunswick
270:
248:
181:
146:
75:
71:
2003:List of towns in Alberta
1449:to return and weigh in.
2855:21:45, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
2841:20:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
2824:20:28, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
2809:20:22, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
2769:05:51, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
2755:23:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
2741:19:49, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
2726:18:23, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
2704:20:00, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
2642:14:36, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
2623:05:53, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
2600:23:35, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
2524:22:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
2148:regional municipalities
1690:settlement_type: one of
1578:Regional municipalities
1411:regional municipilities
1360:Regional municipalities
1299:Regional municipalities
1024:Regional municipalities
1004:Regional Municipalities
563:list pages on Knowledge
235:Canada-related articles
101:Featured list candidate
2959:FL-Class List articles
2514:what you had in mind?
1723:Local service district
1363:List of municipalities
1302:List of municipalities
307:
287:
267:
128:This article is rated
2779:Transclusion problems
2392:and to the question @
2297:Not much help there.
1706:Regional municipality
1546:In Canada in general:
1463:Please also consider
1088:Canada Revenue Agency
778:Wow goes for me too,
306:
286:
266:
65:Today's featured list
2551:Fredericton Junction
2193:The table refers to
1510:Local Governance Act
1339:Urban municipalities
1095:minor reorganization
794:'s option 2 myself.
377:WikiProject Politics
1404:. There are three.
1180:for these reasons:
45:Knowledge community
39:as one of the best
2032:then be placed on
1755:successfully AFDed
1685:Infobox settlement
1559:Local governments
1185:Municipalities Act
1151:province/territory
1076:Municipalities Act
1071:Municipalities Act
813:would be perfect.
490:and various other
479:WikiProject Cities
308:
288:
268:
212:WikiProject Canada
134:content assessment
76:Article milestones
67:on March 21, 2022.
2747:G. Timothy Walton
2718:G. Timothy Walton
2659:G. Timothy Walton
2634:G. Timothy Walton
2592:G. Timothy Walton
2572:Campobello Island
2497:G. Timothy Walton
2468:G. Timothy Walton
2446:G. Timothy Walton
2431:G. Timothy Walton
2394:G. Timothy Walton
2380:G. Timothy Walton
2333:G. Timothy Walton
2299:G. Timothy Walton
2261:G. Timothy Walton
2203:G. Timothy Walton
2199:local governments
2145:rural communities
1968:
1967:
1757:arguably without
1667:G. Timothy Walton
1601:
1600:
1571:Rural communities
1486:G. Timothy Walton
1414:rural communities
1357:Rural communities
1296:Rural communities
1084:Statistics Canada
1027:Rural communities
619:
618:
615:
614:
611:
610:
558:WikiProject Lists
522:
521:
518:
517:
430:
429:
426:
425:
400:politics articles
325:
324:
321:
320:
114:
113:
110:
109:
2976:
2794:
2678:
2494:
2429:Which question?
1794:
1543:
1522:local government
1159:clear similarity
887:
843:
587:
586:
583:
580:
577:
552:
545:
544:
539:
531:
524:
512:
511:
508:
505:
502:
473:
468:
467:
466:
457:
450:
449:
439:
432:
402:
401:
398:
395:
392:
371:
366:
365:
355:
348:
347:
342:
334:
327:
237:
236:
233:
230:
227:
206:
201:
200:
199:
190:
183:
182:
177:
174:
155:
148:
131:
125:
124:
116:
96:
73:
60:
43:produced by the
23:
16:
2984:
2983:
2979:
2978:
2977:
2975:
2974:
2973:
2864:
2863:
2792:
2781:
2714:
2672:
2654:
2652:2021 Population
2578:Upper Miramichi
2488:
2486:
2353:
2240:
2153:Rural districts
1958:Northumberland
1954:Band government
1950:Indian reserve
1818:Aberdeen Parish
1785:
1709:Rural community
1422:, specifically
1336:
1324:, specifically
1275:
1007:Rural community
908:
881:
837:
835:
624:
584:
581:
578:
575:
574:
537:
509:
506:
503:
500:
499:
469:
464:
462:
399:
396:
393:
390:
389:
369:Politics portal
367:
360:
340:
251:High-importance
234:
231:
228:
225:
224:
202:
197:
195:
176:High‑importance
175:
161:
132:on Knowledge's
129:
92:
12:
11:
5:
2982:
2980:
2972:
2971:
2966:
2961:
2956:
2951:
2946:
2941:
2936:
2931:
2926:
2921:
2916:
2911:
2906:
2901:
2896:
2891:
2886:
2881:
2876:
2866:
2865:
2862:
2861:
2860:
2859:
2858:
2857:
2780:
2777:
2776:
2775:
2774:
2773:
2772:
2771:
2713:
2710:
2709:
2708:
2707:
2706:
2653:
2650:
2649:
2648:
2647:
2646:
2645:
2644:
2629:
2625:
2584:
2583:
2582:
2581:
2580:
2579:
2576:
2573:
2570:
2567:
2564:
2561:
2558:
2555:
2552:
2549:
2546:
2543:
2540:
2534:
2527:
2526:
2485:
2482:
2481:
2480:
2479:
2478:
2461:
2460:
2427:
2426:
2410:
2409:
2408:
2372:
2352:
2349:
2348:
2347:
2346:
2345:
2344:
2343:
2295:
2291:
2290:
2289:
2272:
2271:
2239:
2236:
2235:
2234:
2233:
2232:
2220:adjustments).
2214:
2213:
2190:
2189:
2188:
2187:
2155:
2154:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2146:
2143:
2140:
2137:
2123:
2122:
2121:
2120:
2119:
2118:
2042:unincorporated
2015:FLC discussion
1966:
1965:
1962:
1959:
1956:
1951:
1948:
1944:
1943:
1940:
1937:
1934:
1931:
1928:
1922:
1921:
1918:
1915:
1912:
1909:
1906:
1900:
1899:
1896:
1893:
1890:
1887:
1884:
1880:
1879:
1876:
1873:
1870:
1867:
1864:
1858:
1857:
1854:
1851:
1848:
1845:
1842:
1836:
1835:
1832:
1829:
1826:
1823:
1820:
1814:
1813:
1812:Land area km2
1810:
1807:
1804:
1801:
1798:
1784:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1720:
1715:
1710:
1707:
1704:
1701:
1698:
1692:
1691:
1655:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1599:
1598:
1593:
1588:
1582:
1581:
1574:
1567:
1565:Municipalities
1561:
1560:
1556:
1555:
1551:
1550:
1547:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1482:
1416:
1415:
1412:
1409:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1364:
1361:
1358:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1348:
1345:
1340:
1337:
1334:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1303:
1300:
1297:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1287:
1284:
1279:
1278:Municipalities
1276:
1273:
1259:
1258:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1219:
1218:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1189:
1188:
1155:featured topic
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1025:
1022:
1019:
1016:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1005:
1002:
1001:Municipalities
930:
929:
926:
919:
907:
904:
903:
902:
901:
900:
876:
875:
846:Haut-Madawaska
834:
831:
830:
829:
828:
827:
826:
825:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
712:
688:
687:
686:
685:
663:
662:
623:
620:
617:
616:
613:
612:
609:
608:
601:Low-importance
597:
591:
590:
588:
553:
541:
540:
538:Low‑importance
532:
520:
519:
516:
515:
513:
496:the discussion
475:
474:
458:
446:
445:
440:
428:
427:
424:
423:
416:Low-importance
412:
406:
405:
403:
386:the discussion
373:
372:
356:
344:
343:
341:Low‑importance
335:
323:
322:
319:
318:
309:
299:
298:
289:
279:
278:
269:
259:
258:
247:
241:
240:
238:
221:the discussion
208:
207:
191:
179:
178:
156:
144:
143:
137:
126:
112:
111:
108:
107:
104:
97:
89:
88:
85:
82:
78:
77:
69:
68:
61:
53:
52:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2981:
2970:
2967:
2965:
2962:
2960:
2957:
2955:
2952:
2950:
2947:
2945:
2942:
2940:
2937:
2935:
2932:
2930:
2927:
2925:
2922:
2920:
2917:
2915:
2912:
2910:
2907:
2905:
2902:
2900:
2897:
2895:
2892:
2890:
2887:
2885:
2882:
2880:
2877:
2875:
2872:
2871:
2869:
2856:
2852:
2848:
2844:
2843:
2842:
2838:
2834:
2830:
2827:
2826:
2825:
2821:
2817:
2813:
2812:
2811:
2810:
2806:
2802:
2797:
2796:the problem.
2790:
2786:
2778:
2770:
2766:
2762:
2758:
2757:
2756:
2752:
2748:
2744:
2743:
2742:
2738:
2734:
2730:
2729:
2728:
2727:
2723:
2719:
2711:
2705:
2701:
2697:
2693:
2692:
2691:
2687:
2683:
2676:
2671:
2670:
2669:
2668:
2664:
2660:
2651:
2643:
2639:
2635:
2630:
2626:
2624:
2620:
2616:
2612:
2608:
2603:
2602:
2601:
2597:
2593:
2588:
2587:
2586:
2585:
2577:
2574:
2571:
2568:
2565:
2562:
2559:
2556:
2553:
2550:
2547:
2544:
2541:
2538:
2537:
2535:
2531:
2530:
2529:
2528:
2525:
2521:
2517:
2513:
2509:
2508:
2507:
2506:
2502:
2498:
2492:
2483:
2477:
2473:
2469:
2465:
2464:
2463:
2462:
2459:
2455:
2451:
2447:
2443:
2442:
2441:
2440:
2436:
2432:
2425:
2421:
2417:
2414:
2411:
2407:
2403:
2399:
2395:
2391:
2390:
2389:
2385:
2381:
2377:
2373:
2370:
2369:
2368:
2367:
2363:
2359:
2350:
2342:
2338:
2334:
2329:
2328:
2327:
2323:
2319:
2314:
2313:interim lists
2310:
2309:
2308:
2304:
2300:
2296:
2292:
2288:
2284:
2280:
2276:
2275:
2274:
2273:
2270:
2266:
2262:
2257:
2256:
2255:
2254:
2250:
2246:
2237:
2231:
2227:
2223:
2218:
2217:
2216:
2215:
2212:
2208:
2204:
2200:
2196:
2192:
2191:
2186:
2182:
2178:
2173:
2172:
2171:
2170:
2169:
2168:
2164:
2160:
2152:
2147:
2144:
2141:
2138:
2135:
2134:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2128:
2127:this GNB page
2117:
2113:
2109:
2105:
2100:
2099:
2098:
2094:
2090:
2086:
2082:
2081:OpenStreetMap
2078:
2074:
2069:
2068:
2067:
2066:
2062:
2058:
2053:
2051:
2047:
2043:
2039:
2035:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2016:
2012:
2008:
2004:
2000:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1987:
1986:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1973:
1963:
1960:
1957:
1955:
1952:
1949:
1946:
1945:
1941:
1938:
1935:
1932:
1929:
1927:
1924:
1923:
1919:
1916:
1913:
1910:
1907:
1905:
1902:
1901:
1897:
1894:
1891:
1888:
1885:
1882:
1881:
1877:
1874:
1871:
1868:
1865:
1863:
1860:
1859:
1855:
1852:
1849:
1846:
1843:
1841:
1838:
1837:
1833:
1830:
1827:
1824:
1821:
1819:
1816:
1815:
1811:
1808:
1805:
1802:
1799:
1796:
1795:
1792:
1790:
1782:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1742:
1738:
1734:
1730:
1724:
1721:
1719:
1716:
1714:
1711:
1708:
1705:
1702:
1699:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1689:
1688:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1672:
1668:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1638:
1634:
1626:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1597:
1592:
1587:
1583:
1580:
1579:
1573:
1572:
1566:
1562:
1557:
1552:
1545:
1544:
1533:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1505:
1501:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1413:
1410:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1403:
1391:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1376:
1372:
1365:
1362:
1359:
1356:
1355:
1349:
1346:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1338:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1327:
1323:
1316:
1311:
1304:
1301:
1298:
1295:
1294:
1288:
1285:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1277:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1240:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1211:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1181:
1179:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1091:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1072:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1026:
1023:
1020:
1017:
1014:
1013:
1011:
1006:
1003:
1000:
999:
997:
996:
995:
991:
987:
983:
978:
977:
976:
972:
968:
964:
960:
955:
954:
953:
952:
948:
944:
940:
936:
927:
924:
920:
917:
916:
915:
913:
905:
899:
895:
891:
885:
880:
879:
878:
877:
874:
870:
866:
862:
861:
860:
859:
855:
851:
847:
841:
832:
824:
820:
816:
812:
807:
806:
805:
801:
797:
793:
789:
788:New Brunswick
785:
781:
777:
776:
775:
771:
767:
763:
762:
761:
760:
756:
752:
748:
744:
740:
736:
735:
731:
727:
722:
711:
707:
703:
698:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
684:
680:
676:
671:
667:
666:
665:
664:
661:
657:
653:
648:
647:
646:
645:
641:
637:
633:
629:
621:
606:
602:
596:
593:
592:
589:
585:List articles
572:
568:
564:
560:
559:
554:
551:
547:
546:
542:
536:
533:
530:
526:
514:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
480:
472:
471:Cities portal
461:
459:
456:
452:
451:
447:
444:
441:
438:
434:
421:
417:
411:
408:
407:
404:
387:
383:
379:
378:
370:
364:
359:
357:
354:
350:
349:
345:
339:
336:
333:
329:
316:
315:
305:
301:
300:
296:
295:
285:
281:
280:
276:
275:
265:
261:
260:
256:
252:
246:
243:
242:
239:
222:
218:
214:
213:
205:
204:Canada portal
194:
192:
189:
185:
184:
180:
173:
169:
165:
164:New Brunswick
160:
157:
154:
150:
145:
141:
135:
127:
123:
118:
117:
105:
103:
102:
98:
95:
94:March 2, 2016
91:
90:
86:
83:
80:
79:
74:
70:
66:
62:
59:
55:
54:
50:
46:
42:
38:
37:
32:
31:featured list
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
2798:
2782:
2715:
2655:
2609:at worst or
2566:New Maryland
2487:
2428:
2354:
2241:
2198:
2194:
2156:
2124:
2054:
2041:
2038:incorporated
2037:
2030:
1998:
1969:
1850:Restigouche
1786:
1662:
1658:
1612:
1595:
1590:
1585:
1577:
1576:
1570:
1569:
1564:
1529:
1525:
1521:
1518:municipality
1517:
1514:Municipality
1507:
1503:
1499:
1417:
1398:
1378:
1375:would not be
1374:
1318:
1265:
1150:
1092:
1075:
1069:
1067:
931:
909:
836:
796:47.54.11.193
737:
720:
718:
625:
600:
567:project page
556:
477:
415:
375:
312:
292:
272:
250:
210:
140:WikiProjects
99:
49:please do so
34:
26:
2554:Grand Manan
2085:Fredericton
1995:WP:NOTPAPER
1936:Gloucester
1862:Alma Parish
1809:Population
1803:Governance
1093:As for the
492:settlements
172:Communities
2868:Categories
2560:Memramcook
2542:Quispamsis
2539:Saint John
2450:Spooninpot
2416:Spooninpot
2398:Spooninpot
2358:Spooninpot
2311:StatCan’s
2159:Cornellier
2089:Cornellier
1991:WP:NOTDONE
1976:Cornellier
1737:Cornellier
1469:Cornellier
1443:Cornellier
1428:Cornellier
1248:Cornellier
1034:Cornellier
943:Cornellier
739:47.54.9.44
675:47.54.9.44
571:discussion
36:identified
2712:Citations
2675:RonCanada
2613:at best.
2548:Belledune
1972:WP:GNOMEs
1914:Victoria
1904:Aroostook
1840:Addington
1828:Carleton
1800:CSD type
1642:Mattximus
1447:Mattximus
967:Mattximus
890:Mattximus
865:Mattximus
840:Mattximus
815:Mattximus
784:Mattximus
766:Mattximus
743:Mattximus
726:Mattximus
670:WP:TRIVIA
636:Mattximus
628:WP:TRIVIA
168:Geography
2801:Mikeblas
2611:WP:SYNTH
2575:Tracadie
2545:Rothesay
2533:suffice.
2294:apply)."
2142:villages
1926:Bathurst
1911:Village
1908:Village
1889:Village
1886:Village
1596:Villages
1424:WP:SYNTH
1350:Villages
1326:WP:SYNTH
1289:Villages
1086:and the
1021:Villages
391:Politics
382:politics
338:Politics
130:FL-class
106:Promoted
2197:units;
2077:GEO_UID
1892:Albert
1878:222.62
1872:Albert
1866:Parish
1856:935.17
1844:Parish
1822:Parish
1806:County
1787:Thanks
1697:Village
1137:, and
1080:webpage
603:on the
418:on the
253:on the
84:Process
2563:Neguac
2557:McAdam
2195:census
2136:cities
2083:. See
1964:27.86
1942:92.04
1939:11897
1834:446.2
1718:parish
1713:county
1586:Cities
1504:aren't
1344:Cities
1283:Cities
1015:Cities
697:revert
501:Cities
484:cities
443:Cities
226:Canada
217:Canada
159:Canada
136:scale.
87:Result
2847:Hwy43
2833:Hwy43
2816:Hwy43
2761:Hwy43
2733:Hwy43
2696:Hwy43
2682:Hwy43
2615:Hwy43
2607:WP:OR
2569:Tracy
2516:Hwy43
2491:Hwy43
2318:Hwy43
2279:Hwy43
2245:Hwy43
2222:Hwy43
2177:Hwy43
2139:towns
2108:Hwy43
2057:Hwy43
1933:City
1930:City
1920:2.23
1898:47.6
1883:Alma
1797:Name
1789:Hwy43
1763:Hwy43
1637:Hwy43
1616:Hwy43
1591:Towns
1451:Hwy43
1426:". --
1420:WP:OR
1381:Hwy43
1347:Towns
1322:WP:OR
1286:Towns
1226:Hwy43
1197:Hwy43
1163:Hwy43
1049:Hwy43
1018:Towns
986:Hwy43
884:Hwy43
850:Hwy43
792:Hwy43
780:Hwy43
751:Hwy43
702:Hwy43
652:Hwy43
576:Lists
535:Lists
488:towns
41:lists
29:is a
2851:talk
2837:talk
2820:talk
2805:talk
2787:and
2765:talk
2751:talk
2737:talk
2722:talk
2700:talk
2686:talk
2663:talk
2638:talk
2619:talk
2596:talk
2520:talk
2512:this
2501:talk
2472:talk
2454:talk
2435:talk
2420:talk
2402:talk
2384:talk
2362:talk
2337:talk
2322:talk
2303:talk
2283:talk
2265:talk
2249:talk
2226:talk
2207:talk
2181:talk
2163:talk
2112:talk
2093:talk
2061:talk
2040:and
2027:this
2023:this
2017:for
1980:talk
1917:306
1895:213
1869:LSD
1853:656
1847:LSD
1831:781
1825:LSD
1767:talk
1741:talk
1703:City
1700:Town
1671:talk
1646:talk
1620:talk
1528:and
1520:and
1490:talk
1473:talk
1467:. --
1455:talk
1432:talk
1385:talk
1366:etc.
1305:etc.
1252:talk
1230:talk
1201:talk
1183:the
1167:talk
1068:The
1053:talk
1038:talk
990:talk
971:talk
947:talk
937:and
894:talk
869:talk
854:talk
819:talk
800:talk
770:talk
755:talk
741:and
730:talk
721:this
706:talk
679:talk
656:talk
640:talk
245:High
81:Date
2510:Is
2073:API
2025:to
1999:can
1961:48
1500:are
1441:Hi
595:Low
410:Low
2870::
2853:)
2839:)
2822:)
2807:)
2767:)
2753:)
2739:)
2724:)
2702:)
2688:)
2665:)
2640:)
2621:)
2598:)
2522:)
2503:)
2474:)
2456:)
2448:?
2437:)
2422:)
2404:)
2396:?
2386:)
2364:)
2339:)
2324:)
2305:)
2285:)
2267:)
2251:)
2228:)
2209:)
2183:)
2165:)
2157:--
2114:)
2095:)
2063:)
1993:,
1982:)
1875:5
1769:)
1743:)
1673:)
1648:)
1622:)
1492:)
1475:)
1457:)
1434:)
1387:)
1328:?
1254:)
1232:)
1203:)
1169:)
1157:,
1147:QC
1143:PE
1139:YK
1135:NU
1133:,
1131:NT
1129:,
1127:SK
1125:,
1123:ON
1121:,
1119:NS
1117:,
1115:NL
1113:,
1111:NB
1109:,
1107:MB
1105:,
1103:BC
1101:,
1099:AB
1055:)
1040:)
992:)
973:)
949:)
896:)
871:)
856:)
821:)
802:)
772:)
757:)
732:)
708:)
681:)
658:)
642:)
486:,
170:/
166:/
162::
2849:(
2835:(
2818:(
2803:(
2763:(
2749:(
2735:(
2720:(
2698:(
2684:(
2677::
2673:@
2661:(
2636:(
2617:(
2594:(
2518:(
2499:(
2493::
2489:@
2470:(
2452:(
2433:(
2418:(
2400:(
2382:(
2360:(
2335:(
2320:(
2301:(
2281:(
2263:(
2247:(
2224:(
2205:(
2179:(
2161:(
2110:(
2091:(
2059:(
1978:(
1765:(
1739:(
1669:(
1644:(
1618:(
1488:(
1471:(
1453:(
1430:(
1383:(
1250:(
1228:(
1199:(
1165:(
1090:.
1051:(
1036:(
988:(
969:(
945:(
925:.
892:(
886::
882:@
867:(
852:(
842::
838:@
817:(
798:(
768:(
753:(
728:(
704:(
677:(
654:(
638:(
607:.
573:.
422:.
317:.
297:.
277:.
257:.
142::
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.