Knowledge

Talk:List of municipalities in New Brunswick

Source đź“ť

1074:, which enables incorporation of local governments (i.e. municipalities) in the province, is long in the tooth. Upon review, it dates back to at least 1973 and possibly further back to 1967. It is evident that, back then, there were only three different status types of municipalities – cities, towns and villages – with different incorporation requirements. In 2005, the Act was amended to provide the opportunity to pursue a fourth incorporated local government or municipal status type – rural community. In 2013, it was amended again to enable a fifth incorporated local government or municipal status type – regional municipality. Thus there are five status types enabled by the 630:, as it is not directly related to the list in question. As another user pointed out "If we are going to start including financials, then where does it end? Number of employees? Kilometre lengths of roads, water pipes, sewers, etc.?". Also the table was very confusing and included numbers with no definition of what the numbers meant outside of the text, and also contained bare links to pdfs. It will also make this article quite a bit different in form and style to all the other provinces/state list of local government pages. I think if this information is to stay on wikipedia, it could be given it's own article " 2243:
instead of replacing or editing the existing table, simply adding a second table that lists the post-reform municipalities. More specifically, it would simply share the first four columns of the existing table but exclude the final five columns because no census data is available. This means the existing table goes untouched other than branding it as the pre-reform list of municipalities. I will implement this at some point. Once the 2026 census results come out in early 2027, we can return to having just one table. Happy to receive feedback on this suggestion in the meantime. Cheers,
198: 264: 304: 21: 353: 332: 122: 363: 455: 437: 58: 550: 529: 188: 153: 2052:. The gnomes then only have to update the template once every five years in one location rather than updating in three different tables every five years. Compound this across all provinces and territories and their statuses, a huge load would be lifted. This is something I want to do, though I have never created a template before and am not familiar with its necessary additional coding. 2628:
map, highway maps, maps in the previous regulatons defining LSDs, municipalities, rural communities, and Tracadie all show that almost every single boundary in the province was changed, even in cases where no change is noted in the text. There's avoidance of original research and then there's sticking one's head in the sand like the proverbial ostrich and pretending nothing happened.
284: 465: 786:, would a change of title of the present article from "List of municipalities in New Brunswick" to "Municipalities in New Brunswick" help you overcome your difficulty? That way we could have sections on "list of" and "municipal finance" all on one page. The benefit would be that we wouldn't need to grow our "see also" list, for example at 2627:
Whatever. The fact remains that any municipality other than those should not be noted as unaffected because the regulation only noted changes when they affected populated areas. Call it original research or whatever epithet you wish, a simple visual comparison of the new municipal maps with electoral
2355:
I am of the opinion that @g Walton will continue to have a alternative motive (perhaps political or bureaucratic), and I would like to develop a test for this theory by requesting a consensus involving the community of contributors. But in the meantime, I am asking that a simple and current list of
2795:
for transclusion, but it looks like the end of the section is never detected and the balance of the article is transcluded instead -- disrupting the rest of the referencing article. I believe this used to work correctly, but I don't think there's a good way to figure out what change may have caused
2604:
The 14 municipalities above that were continued as they existed already have the note stating "The 2023 local governance reform did not affect Foo." I am doubtful there is a source that verifies "where the boundaries were only slightly affected—no longer cutting across properties" and/or "these are
2101:
Very interesting. Could you sandbox a quick and dirty template showing how the API/JSON routine accesses StatCan data to enable this non-programmer’s understanding? Also, some questions about parameters. In my mind I have parameters that toggle on and off rows within the table template based on the
1610:
To recap, Cornellier sees it as three types (bolded in light grey cells) based on legislated definitions whereas I see it as five types, or three types where one type has three sub-types, based on how municipalities are generally synonymous with local governments in Canada (italicized in light grey
1046:
Okay. Thanks for the clarity. I'm going to revert your edits for the time being to allow investigation into this and further discussion to seek consensus, given this article's featured list status and how the edits you've made makes this list article inconsistent with the 10 other featured lists of
649:
I am the other user quoted above and I agree the recently added (and since deleted) information is too granular and not relevant to this list. Its placement front and centre before the list of the municipalities themselves certainly was not helpful and gave this trivial information more weight than
2031:
I think the best solution to take the load off gnomes from having to update with, for example, new census info that would need to be repeated on two or more articles of slightly different scope is to build a template. Say you build the above table for all CSDs in NB as a template instead. It could
2656:
Calculating 2021 population solely on municipalities affected is misleading in many cases due to the number of LSDs included. The 2021 census figures now list many of them with their parish CSDs and they should be included in calculations, marking those that are impossible to calculate due to the
2242:
At some point, someone is going to be bold by editing the table that lists all municipalities to match the outcome of the recent local governance reforms. This would be problematic because we have no amended census data for those municipalities that experienced boundary changes. My suggestion is,
723:
page. This page is just a list with very basic demographic information, and that's it. Any addition would be trivial relative to the purpose of this list. Should we add another section on number of lakes? Hospitals? Schools? There are separate pages for many of those. It doesn't make sense to put
2258:
Sounds reasonable but the first table would need an introductory note stating the the second table exists. I've already had to revert a couple of bad edits elsewhere that stated a former municipality was now included in the census data for a neighbouring rural CSD without bothering to adjust the
2174:
Interesting how rural communities and regional municipalities are now properly nested alongside the other three types. The province corrected its unintentional semantics error introduced in the 2000s this time around, at least on the GNB page. The page still isn’t perfect however as there is no
1639:
sums up the two competing categorizations. I understand where the 3 categories (with 3 sub categories) comes from, however to prevent confusion with the very title of this article, I recommend keeping the organization as we have it, with a comment mentioning that New Brunswick categorizes cities
1194:
Yes. This goes back to my long in the tooth comment. When the Act was amended in 2005 and again in 2013, the definition of 'municipality' should have been amended to "means a city, town, village, rural community or rural municipality", or re-termed as "'urban municipality' means a city, town or
808:
I still don't think it's wise to include two completely different topics in a single page. But thankfully Hwy43 made a great alternative, and I think all the data you inputted deserves it's own page, specifically because municipal finance is a distinct subject. For the same reason we also don't
2315:
are published annually, usually in the fall. It will either be reflected in this year’s forthcoming list or, due to the volumes of changes, next year’s list. For all the recent changes in PEI, it wasn’t until the second edition after the effective dates of the changes that the adjustments were
2070:
I like your template idea. I'll take a crack at developing one. Templates do take parameters, so it's conceivable that all of the, say, census data for a province could live in one template, and then be displayed as a subset on the page for a county or city. That template could even be built
1319:
I understand and really like the preferred format used for MB. If the GoNB and/or the Act explicitly differentiated the three original types as 'urban municipalities' instead of the ambiguous 'municipalities', I'd be all-in immediately like done for MB as well as SK and AB. However, if we do
956:
Unless I missed something what you said is exactly reflected in the lead: "Approximately one-third of the residents of New Brunswick do not live in municipalities but reside in local service districts, which are unincorporated communities administered by the Minister of Environment and Local
1613:
Ultimately, we are tasked with determining if the organization of the list article should fully match the legislative hierarchy/definitions or what is generally understood in the Canadian context. If there is consensus to do the former, I have put some thought together on how to do so while
2219:
If you are referring to the table at the top of this thread, CSD type remains the proper column title due to the presence of reserves (and we are assuming StatCan will create the new CSD type of rural districts, which will eventually be confirmed once StatCan’s interim list publishes the
2330:
A second response from StatsCan: "The next release for New Brunswick (NB) census data based on the new municipal boundaries effective January 2023 would be included in the release of the Census of Population 2026 data. At this time, Census 2026 release dates have not been determined."
979:
As LSDs are unincorporated communities and the scope of this article are incorporated communities (i.e. municipalities), what we have here on this article, as amended by Mattximus, is appropriate. A list article inclusive of both incorporated and unincorporated communities would be
1640:
towns and villages as "municipalities" distinct from regional and rural municipalities in the lead. I believe a line to this effect in the lead will allow us to keep the 5 categories and reduce confusion while still being true to the concerns raised above. This is just my 2 cents.
699:
but we need to arrive at a consensus-based solution. I'll create a sandbox for us to paste the reverted content and collaboratively craft it so that it can be laced into the article. I'll return in a couple hours to set that up once I have an extended period of free time. Cheers,
2679:
please remove the final column. It is original research and in many cases incorrect as explained by GTW. Also please apply proper references to all remaining columns. This is a featured list. A bare bones reference with just a url in the title of the table is not sufficient.
2589:
There, that's all. Maybe a note stating that "these are the only municipalities whose census population data should be unaffected" would be the most accurate way of putting it. Campobello Island is probably the only municipality that had no boundary adjustments at all.
2106:, there would be parameters that: toggle on columns for 2011 population, percent change, population density, and incorporation date; toggle off the governance and county columns; and change the "CSD type" heading to read "Municipality type" or simply "Type"? Cheers, 672:
definition, unless someone can point to a bullet point on that list. I'll place it *after* the list of municipalities themselves, as per Hwy43. I accept that we do things differently in NB, and hope that other Canadians can accept wiki as a tool for diverse people.
2532:
Not quite. I was thinking of places where the boundaries were only slightly affected—no longer cutting across properties, for example—and not worth noting in the Regulation other than showing up on the new maps. A single shared footnote or cell colour should
1761:(e.g. the New Brunswick, Canadian community, and Canadian geography WikiProjects weren’t notified). I might RfC two or all three of them in future with additional detailed content on current towns/villages, lists and details about former towns/villages, etc. 2293:
I sent an email to StatsCan asking if there's a release date for data based on the new municipal boundaries. The response: "The data you are requesting is not available as a standard product. However, it may be available through a custom order (fees may
1312:
The consequence is we get casual readers asking questions like "does this mean rural communities and regional municipalities aren't municipalities?"; "if so, why are they even mentioned in this article?"; etc. At the end of the day, how many types of
100: 35: 650:
the most relevant and important information in the list article. Not sure if its own article is warranted either. Research should be undertaken to determine if precedent articles have been created along the same vein before boldly creating one.
1214: 1087: 2631:
Change the footnotes to "the text of the regulation did not mentioned any change in boundaries" or whatever. Strip off the absurd and misleading footnotes that such-and-such was unaffected except for annexing some unincorporated areas.
1532:. This means that they are not synonymous according to New Brunswick legislation, so I now understand, more than previously, where Cornellier is coming from. Rather, "local government" is an umbrella term above "municipality" instead. 1399:
The second idea can't work because villages are not urban. You asked "how many types of incorporated municipalities, as the concept generally known and understood by society, exist in NB?" Well the NB government answers that at
848:? Need new entry in the table for this new rural community, plus removal of four villages. Prose in the Rural community and Village sections would also require updating, as well as likely the overall article lead. Cheers, 1266:
If we think about the casual readers that visit this article that aren't as knowledgeable as us about the intricacies of municipalities in NB, the following article heading organization would create further confusion.
2029:, but I have more work to do. I am currently researching former municipalities by every status across every province and territory so that I can start integrating more former municipalities in each sub-list article. 2102:
scope of article. Can parameters also toggle on and off columns in the template? Can they also switch the names of column headings? Using your quick table above as an example in relation to the current table at
2878: 1683:, and a desire to keep things simple. But as has been pointed out, the term "municipality" is overloaded. Also, the term "village", "town", "city" often make up part of a municipality's official name. So 932:
Anybody (1/3 of the population) not in one of the three above types is in an LSD, administered by the Minister of Environment and Local Government. This should be made clear in the prose, and a linked to
2716:
At a glance, it looks like types of communities and census data both appear in multiple citations. Could somebody with the time and inclination do whatever updates and mergers are necessary? Thanks.
1970:
Might not be too onerous to build the first time if I take a CSV file from the governement site and do a scripted transform into a wikitable. Obviously this will create more maintenance work for the
1754: 1264:
As mentioned, their semantics on the webpage, which is consistent with their semantics in the dated Act that has a definition that hasn't been updated properly, has created this current confusion.
1484:
Also, the provincial government itself is inconsistent in stating in press releases and web documents whether rural municipalities and the regional municipality are distinct from municipalities.
2079:
of a place, then fire off a query to statcan to retrieve pop data. We do something like this when we add {{Coord}} to {{Infobox settlement}} and use that to build a map based off information at
941:. I suggest that the page be organized to reflect that. I gives undue weight to the distinction (which is what?) between towns, villages, and cities, and should give some context about LSDs. -- 2873: 1082:
make this confusing. It is evident that the spirit and intent is that there are five different municipal status types providing local government in the province, and such is acknowledged by
746: 2759:#1 and #7 should not be merged as #7 cannot verify "eighth-most populous" and "third-smallest province by land area". #1 on the other hand can verify as it lists all provinces in Canada. 2071:
programmatically once every five years by parsing a downloaded data set from statcan. Here's another idea: Statistics Canada has exposed all 2016 census data for a geo of interest via an
790:, and we needn't have a sentence like "For a list, see the list page" on the muni finance page, and vice-versa. Growth of redirection link is also an evil to be avoided. But I do like 2087:
for an example of how I did that. Ideal long-term solution? Those are hard to come by in the ever-changing world of IT, but I think this could be a fruitful line of investigation. --
2044:
communities). It would be built with invokable parameters to only display cities, towns, villages, rural communities and regional municipalities for use when placing the template on
888:
Ok I think I've updated the table and prose, the only hiccup is that I could not find the land area anywhere, but I did make a note of this in the table. Is there anything I missed?
2923: 2913: 719:
For me, the issue isn't the content that you are adding, I actually think it does belong on wikipedia, and deserves it's own page. My issue is that it doesn't really fit well in
1195:
village" to disambiguate from the two other types of municipalities introduced by these amendments decades later. The GoNB has therefore created this semantics-based confusion.
2371:
The idiom is ulterior motive and no, I don't have one. I'm quite open in my motive of trying to make information on our governance, past and present, accurate and accessible.
2277:
Subsection headings would negate the need for an introductory note. We aren’t writing a user manual. Articles shouldn’t have content that describes “how to” use the article.
1130: 1114: 965:
is also present in the see also section. I believe that covers it, no? I don't think there should be any details about LSD in the body as this is a list of municipalities.
2791:. Transclusion isn't working correctly at all, as both of these articles show duplicated sections and terrible layout. It seems like this article is meant to provide the 1654:
Agreed. A fine distinction that's meaningless or unknown to most people (even many who work in the field) gets in the way of usefulness when it comes to writing articles.
2888: 962: 938: 244: 1379:
As for LSDs, they are not incorporated municipalities, whereas LGDs in MB are incorporated municipalities. This is why LSDs are not included in this article. Cheers,
1224:
Yes. The feds therefore also see that there are truly five types of municipalities in NB (though they are missing the "Regional" prefix for Tracadie's status type).
64: 2918: 2898: 2908: 2018: 1142: 745:, I have created a sandbox with two options. Each option includes my suggested edits, comments and requests for citations and clarifications. You can view it at 2948: 2495:
Do you think it would be reasonable to use some sort of markup in the table to indicate which municipalities weren't significantly affected by the reforms?
2903: 2745:#1 and #7 can be merged; add in #23 if you're willing to combine two sources in the same citation. I guess #5 and #9 are different enough to leave alone. 1176:
Thanks for the info, I was unaware that conformity with homologous articles of other provinces was a requirement. I'm proposing a layout like that of the
2375: 1102: 313: 171: 1614:
respecting the theme and approach applied across all provincial/territorial entries in the scope of the List of municipalities in Canada topic. Cheers,
2938: 2883: 419: 409: 293: 167: 2893: 1635:
I think for the average reader the most important thing would be to use what is generally understood in the Canadian context. I think the table by
2103: 2045: 1732: 1110: 254: 1680: 1401: 1243: 1083: 1079: 911: 2943: 1722: 1679:
Thanks for your thoughtful replies. I'll go with the flow. I suppose I was motivated by a (too?) literal interpretation of the NB Government's
1126: 958: 934: 604: 2963: 2953: 2928: 2075:
which responds with JSON. For any non-programmers reading this, it means that we could create a template which would take as a parameter the
2010: 1118: 594: 2828: 2784: 2033: 1078:
that all walk and talk like incorporated local governments (i.e. municipalities). It is unfortunate that semantics in both the Act and the
981: 764:
Wow, that was a lot of work put into that page. I strongly support option 2, primarily because each wikipedia page should have one focus.
668:
Thanks for the input. As with all novel ideas, it is encountering resistance. I certainly don't think the financial information meets the
2356:
municipalities and perhaps near municipalities in New Brunswick be established without accompanying paraphernalia. Questions? Seconder?
2968: 2933: 1758: 385: 273: 163: 1516:, it states "In Canada, municipalities are local governments established through provincial and territorial legislation...". The terms 1498:
I've observed the same in Alberta. Sometimes the provincial government says special areas, improvement districts, and Metis settlement
1177: 1106: 795: 809:
include list of river length per municipality, lakes per municipality, crime rates, etc... in this page. I would think a page titled
631: 2006: 1717: 1712: 1246:
clearly states that there are four types of local government: Municipalities, Regional Municipalities, rural communies, and LSDs. --
1134: 1122: 1098: 922: 495: 220: 1512:(LGA), I am going to try to re-articulate a different way to reveal that both Cornellier and I are correct in different ways. At 1146: 674: 570: 1418:
We should present it as the government does. Anything else, justified by not confusing the "casual reader", could be "violating
2958: 2049: 1839: 1750: 1138: 998:
Thanks for the quick feedback. My main point, which got obscured by LSDs, is that per the gov't the following entities exist:
1817: 376: 337: 1097:, see how it deviates from the standardized organization implemented for the equivalent featured lists of municipalities in 810: 478: 442: 211: 158: 133: 2750: 2721: 2662: 2637: 2595: 2500: 2471: 2434: 2383: 2336: 2302: 2264: 2206: 1670: 1489: 566: 562: 557: 534: 40: 2126: 2788: 1861: 2845:
Now fixed in both locations with additional fixes at the former, including the uncoupling of towns and villages.
1524:
are effectively synonymous in Canada. Drilling down however to the New Brunswick context, according to the LGA,
1032:
Cities towns and villages are all legally and functionally the same thing. This is not reflected in the page. --
2002: 1903: 724:
everything in one list. But we can link a new page from here for sure. Would that be an acceptable compromise?
30: 1047:
municipalities across Canada's other provinces and territories. Hopefully you can sit tight for a bit. Cheer,
626:
I reverted the recent addition of financial information for several reasons. First, it seems to run afoul of
1925: 799: 121: 20: 2746: 2717: 2658: 2633: 2591: 2496: 2467: 2445: 2430: 2393: 2379: 2332: 2298: 2260: 2202: 1666: 1485: 918:
Municipalities: cities, towns and villages, which are functionally the same and differ only in size AFAIK.
678: 2036:
in its entirety (your proposed table is most appropriate there because that list article's scope is both
749:. I look forward to your comments. The more I have thought about this, I am leaning to Option 2. Cheers, 57: 2854: 2840: 2823: 2808: 2768: 2754: 2740: 2725: 2703: 2689: 2666: 2641: 2622: 2599: 2523: 2504: 2475: 2457: 2438: 2423: 2405: 2387: 2365: 2340: 2325: 2306: 2286: 2268: 2252: 2229: 2210: 2184: 2175:
acknowledgement of reserves, which will be voids in the fabric of local govs/munis and rural districts.
2166: 2115: 2096: 2064: 1983: 1770: 1744: 1674: 1649: 1623: 1493: 1476: 1458: 1435: 1388: 1255: 1233: 1204: 1170: 1056: 1041: 993: 974: 950: 897: 872: 857: 822: 803: 773: 758: 733: 709: 682: 659: 643: 139: 44: 2799:
Does anyone have insight into the way transclusion was meant to work here, before it was disrupted? --
2076: 2453: 2419: 2401: 2361: 2162: 2092: 1979: 1740: 1506:. It is frustrating because we like to strive for things to be perfect and non-contradictory on here. 1472: 1431: 1251: 1037: 946: 738: 2674: 1974:
but that could be offset by removing one or two of the many other place lists that exist for NB. --
1657:
Rural communities and the regional municipality are quasi-municipalities but retitling the article
1645: 1464: 970: 893: 868: 818: 769: 729: 639: 494:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
384:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
219:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2804: 1994: 1990: 48: 1735:
for now. government_type could be populated with the same values except parish and county. --
1481:
I'll point out that the Municipalities Act was replaced by the Local Governance Act in 2017.
669: 627: 491: 263: 2850: 2836: 2819: 2764: 2736: 2699: 2685: 2618: 2610: 2605:
the only municipalities whose census population data should be unaffected". Such requires
2519: 2449: 2415: 2397: 2357: 2321: 2282: 2248: 2225: 2180: 2158: 2111: 2088: 2060: 1975: 1971: 1953: 1766: 1736: 1619: 1468: 1454: 1442: 1427: 1423: 1384: 1325: 1247: 1229: 1200: 1166: 1149:
that will eventually follow. To achieve the goal of making the "List of municipalities in
1052: 1033: 989: 942: 853: 754: 705: 655: 368: 303: 2312: 1509: 1158: 2378:
page, though I don't actually maintain that or this beyond fixing typos if I see them.
1641: 1446: 966: 889: 864: 845: 839: 814: 783: 765: 742: 725: 635: 2072: 1184: 1070: 362: 352: 331: 2867: 2800: 2080: 863:
Yep I can work on that this week no problem. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
787: 470: 203: 1753:. There were separate lists for towns, villages and rural communities but they were 2731:
What citations are you referring to? #1, #7 and #23 are similar but all different.
2606: 2021:. I've since taken initial steps of following the Alberta approach, taking it from 1513: 1419: 1321: 1314: 1154: 2466:
No. It should be about its history, its places, its people, and so on, and so on.
2001:
be expanded to be more than a duplicate by adding additional details. Look at how
1684: 1611:
cells). I hope the above helps understanding of where my concerns are coming from.
2694:
With no action, I have deleted the column myself now that I have some free time.
1526:"local government" means a municipality, rural community or regional municipality 928:
Rural community: is an incorporated community that has a locally elected council.
2084: 454: 436: 2005:
has much more additional content on towns than the main municipalities list at
1989:
I like your thought process but what that AfD discussion failed to consider is
2846: 2832: 2815: 2760: 2732: 2695: 2681: 2614: 2515: 2490: 2317: 2278: 2244: 2221: 2176: 2107: 2056: 1788: 1762: 1636: 1615: 1450: 1380: 1317:, as the concept generally known and understood by society, exist in NB? Five. 1225: 1196: 1162: 1048: 985: 883: 849: 844:
feel up to the task of updating this list article to reflect incorporation of
791: 779: 750: 701: 651: 460: 358: 193: 187: 152: 2374:
If you want a full list of current municipalities, you can find that on the
957:
Government and have no local government of their own". I've added a link to
549: 528: 2055:
What are your thoughts on that being an ideal long-term solution? Cheers,
1665:
seems to slide into the "distinction without a difference" logic fallacy.
381: 283: 2412: 2316:
published. It is assumed the delay was due to the volume of changes.
1791:. What do you think about having an all-encompassing list like this: 216: 2259:
numbers to new figures, which of course haven't been released yet.
1217:
groups municipalities together in one list, distinguished by type.
921:
Regional Municipalities: introduced in May 2013, so far just the
1659:
List of municipalities and quasi-municipalities in New Brunswick
487: 483: 634:" or something like that, but it does not belong in this list. 2831:
is fixed, though I disagree with them being bundled together.
2201:
are a different matter. The discussion below deals with this.
115: 2814:
I will take a peak. I think I know what went wrong and when.
2444:
Is a page about a community strictly about it's governance @
2133:
Local governments ("also commonly known as municipalities")
2048:, and then only the cities parameter invoked for display at 2009:. The proposed AfDer for the NB sub-lists has sights set on 1445:, I have put some further thought on this. Just waiting for 302: 282: 262: 1408:
municipalities: towns villages and cities according to size
1377:
inappropriate, I suggest this would be an ideal compromise.
747:
User:Hwy43/List of municipalities in New Brunswick/sandbox
569:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 1508:
Based on Timothy's advisement (thank you) about the new
1320:
institute the slightly adjusted below, are we violating
2879:
Featured lists that have appeared on the main page once
2829:
List of communities in New Brunswick#Towns and villages
2511: 2026: 2022: 2014: 1542: 1187:
states: "'municipality' means a city, town or village".
1094: 696: 93: 1749:
For City in the infobox you could alternately link to
2536:
Let me just check the Reg, and I'll give you a list.
2238:
Table adjustment due to 2023 local governance reforms
782:! I agree with a lot of your constructive criticism. 482:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 380:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 215:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2874:Featured lists that have appeared on the main page 63:This article appeared on Knowledge's Main Page as 1663:List of incorporated communities in New Brunswick 833:Update to reflect incorporation of Haut-Madawaska 963:List of local service districts in New Brunswick 939:List of local service districts in New Brunswick 961:in the lead though, that is a good suggestion. 632:Municipal debts of New Brunswick municipalities 2657:division of some LSDs by multiple new bodies. 2019:List of municipalities in Prince Edward Island 2924:High-importance Canadian communities articles 8: 2914:High-importance Geography of Canada articles 1530:"municipality" means a city, town or village 2484:Indicating communities unaffected by reform 2413:https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Valley_Waters 906:Legal types of local government in NB today 561:, an attempt to structure and organize all 2376:2023 New Brunswick local governance reform 1793: 523: 431: 326: 147: 72: 15: 2129:, the province is subdivided as follows: 1575: 1568: 1563: 1558: 1012:But the article says these types exist: 565:. If you wish to help, please visit the 2889:High-importance Canada-related articles 2104:List of municipalities in New Brunswick 2046:List of municipalities in New Brunswick 1733:List of municipalities in New Brunswick 1335:List of municipalities in New Brunswick 1274:List of municipalities in New Brunswick 695:Let's slow down a bit here. Pardon the 525: 433: 328: 149: 27:List of municipalities in New Brunswick 2919:FL-Class Canadian communities articles 2899:High-importance New Brunswick articles 1215:List of municipalities - New Brunswick 1145:featured list and the final remaining 959:Local service district (New Brunswick) 935:Local service district (New Brunswick) 2909:FL-Class Geography of Canada articles 2011:List of towns in Prince Edward Island 1997:, etc., and that sub-lists by status 1465:my related remarks at WikiProject_NB 914:, the following are legally defined: 622:The addition of financial information 119: 7: 2949:FL-Class WikiProject Cities articles 2785:List of communities in New Brunswick 2351:@g and list of municipalities proper 2034:List of communities in New Brunswick 1731:The first five will have to link to 1687:should be populated as follows (?): 1502:municipalities and other times they 984:, which could use some improvement. 982:List of communities in New Brunswick 555:This article is within the scope of 476:This article is within the scope of 374:This article is within the scope of 209:This article is within the scope of 2125:Note that as of 2023, according to 1549:Municipalities = local governments 1161:among all lists will be important. 1141:as well as the currently nominated 138:It is of interest to the following 47:. If you can update or improve it, 2904:WikiProject New Brunswick articles 1783:All-encompassing table or template 1178:List of municipalities in Manitoba 811:Municipal finance in New Brunswick 14: 2783:This article is transcluded from 2013:based on comments at the current 2007:List of municipalities in Alberta 923:Regional Municipality of Tracadie 2939:Low-importance politics articles 2884:FL-Class Canada-related articles 1373:If there is consensus that this 548: 527: 463: 453: 435: 361: 351: 330: 314:WikiProject Canadian communities 196: 186: 151: 120: 56: 19: 2894:FL-Class New Brunswick articles 2050:List of cities in New Brunswick 1751:List of cities in New Brunswick 910:Per this Government of NB page 599:This article has been rated as 414:This article has been rated as 294:WikiProject Geography of Canada 249:This article has been rated as 1947:Big Hole Tract 8 (South Half) 1554:In New Brunswick per its LGA: 394:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics 1: 2944:WikiProject Politics articles 1661:would be absurd. Changing to 873:00:45, 29 December 2018 (UTC) 858:06:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC) 498:and see a list of open tasks. 397:Template:WikiProject Politics 388:and see a list of open tasks. 311:This article is supported by 291:This article is supported by 271:This article is supported by 223:and see a list of open tasks. 2964:Low-importance List articles 2954:All WikiProject Cities pages 2929:All WikiProject Canada pages 2341:17:43, 17 January 2023 (UTC) 2326:07:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC) 2307:01:16, 13 January 2023 (UTC) 2287:07:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC) 2269:09:06, 12 January 2023 (UTC) 2253:08:12, 12 January 2023 (UTC) 2230:07:40, 13 January 2023 (UTC) 2211:01:11, 13 January 2023 (UTC) 2185:07:40, 13 January 2023 (UTC) 2167:00:30, 13 January 2023 (UTC) 1594: 1589: 1584: 1153:" family of list articles a 504:Knowledge:WikiProject Cities 229:Knowledge:WikiProject Canada 2793:<section name=towns: --> 1315:incorporated municipalities 1242:This Government of NB page 898:21:43, 1 January 2019 (UTC) 579:Knowledge:WikiProject Lists 510:WikiProject Cities articles 507:Template:WikiProject Cities 232:Template:WikiProject Canada 2985: 2969:WikiProject Lists articles 2934:FL-Class politics articles 2789:List of villages in Canada 2690:05:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC) 2667:02:59, 26 April 2023 (UTC) 2505:00:52, 30 March 2023 (UTC) 2476:23:25, 29 March 2023 (UTC) 2458:21:11, 29 March 2023 (UTC) 2439:04:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC) 2424:04:19, 29 March 2023 (UTC) 2406:03:30, 29 March 2023 (UTC) 2388:01:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC) 2366:00:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC) 1681:Types of Local Governments 1402:Types of Local Governments 1244:Types of Local Governments 912:Types of Local Governments 605:project's importance scale 582:Template:WikiProject Lists 420:project's importance scale 255:project's importance scale 33:, which means it has been 2116:16:03, 19 June 2020 (UTC) 2097:14:21, 19 June 2020 (UTC) 2065:21:26, 18 June 2020 (UTC) 1984:13:25, 18 June 2020 (UTC) 1771:17:04, 17 June 2020 (UTC) 1759:satisfactory consultation 1745:16:28, 17 June 2020 (UTC) 1675:02:27, 17 June 2020 (UTC) 1650:19:17, 16 June 2020 (UTC) 1624:05:19, 16 June 2020 (UTC) 1553: 1548: 1494:02:55, 16 June 2020 (UTC) 1477:01:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC) 1459:01:00, 16 June 2020 (UTC) 1436:10:41, 12 June 2020 (UTC) 1389:22:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC) 1256:20:52, 11 June 2020 (UTC) 1234:22:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC) 1213:This Revenue Canada page 1205:22:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC) 1171:05:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC) 1057:03:19, 11 June 2020 (UTC) 1042:02:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC) 994:00:29, 11 June 2020 (UTC) 975:22:10, 10 June 2020 (UTC) 951:21:14, 10 June 2020 (UTC) 823:23:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC) 804:22:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC) 774:21:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC) 759:06:47, 16 June 2016 (UTC) 734:20:40, 15 June 2016 (UTC) 710:00:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC) 683:19:48, 15 June 2016 (UTC) 660:07:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC) 644:20:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC) 598: 543: 448: 413: 346: 310: 290: 274:WikiProject New Brunswick 270: 248: 181: 146: 75: 71: 2003:List of towns in Alberta 1449:to return and weigh in. 2855:21:45, 7 May 2023 (UTC) 2841:20:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC) 2824:20:28, 7 May 2023 (UTC) 2809:20:22, 7 May 2023 (UTC) 2769:05:51, 8 May 2023 (UTC) 2755:23:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC) 2741:19:49, 7 May 2023 (UTC) 2726:18:23, 7 May 2023 (UTC) 2704:20:00, 7 May 2023 (UTC) 2642:14:36, 8 May 2023 (UTC) 2623:05:53, 8 May 2023 (UTC) 2600:23:35, 7 May 2023 (UTC) 2524:22:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC) 2148:regional municipalities 1690:settlement_type: one of 1578:Regional municipalities 1411:regional municipilities 1360:Regional municipalities 1299:Regional municipalities 1024:Regional municipalities 1004:Regional Municipalities 563:list pages on Knowledge 235:Canada-related articles 101:Featured list candidate 2959:FL-Class List articles 2514:what you had in mind? 1723:Local service district 1363:List of municipalities 1302:List of municipalities 307: 287: 267: 128:This article is rated 2779:Transclusion problems 2392:and to the question @ 2297:Not much help there. 1706:Regional municipality 1546:In Canada in general: 1463:Please also consider 1088:Canada Revenue Agency 778:Wow goes for me too, 306: 286: 266: 65:Today's featured list 2551:Fredericton Junction 2193:The table refers to 1510:Local Governance Act 1339:Urban municipalities 1095:minor reorganization 794:'s option 2 myself. 377:WikiProject Politics 1404:. There are three. 1180:for these reasons: 45:Knowledge community 39:as one of the best 2032:then be placed on 1755:successfully AFDed 1685:Infobox settlement 1559:Local governments 1185:Municipalities Act 1151:province/territory 1076:Municipalities Act 1071:Municipalities Act 813:would be perfect. 490:and various other 479:WikiProject Cities 308: 288: 268: 212:WikiProject Canada 134:content assessment 76:Article milestones 67:on March 21, 2022. 2747:G. Timothy Walton 2718:G. Timothy Walton 2659:G. Timothy Walton 2634:G. Timothy Walton 2592:G. Timothy Walton 2572:Campobello Island 2497:G. Timothy Walton 2468:G. Timothy Walton 2446:G. Timothy Walton 2431:G. Timothy Walton 2394:G. Timothy Walton 2380:G. Timothy Walton 2333:G. Timothy Walton 2299:G. Timothy Walton 2261:G. Timothy Walton 2203:G. Timothy Walton 2199:local governments 2145:rural communities 1968: 1967: 1757:arguably without 1667:G. Timothy Walton 1601: 1600: 1571:Rural communities 1486:G. Timothy Walton 1414:rural communities 1357:Rural communities 1296:Rural communities 1084:Statistics Canada 1027:Rural communities 619: 618: 615: 614: 611: 610: 558:WikiProject Lists 522: 521: 518: 517: 430: 429: 426: 425: 400:politics articles 325: 324: 321: 320: 114: 113: 110: 109: 2976: 2794: 2678: 2494: 2429:Which question? 1794: 1543: 1522:local government 1159:clear similarity 887: 843: 587: 586: 583: 580: 577: 552: 545: 544: 539: 531: 524: 512: 511: 508: 505: 502: 473: 468: 467: 466: 457: 450: 449: 439: 432: 402: 401: 398: 395: 392: 371: 366: 365: 355: 348: 347: 342: 334: 327: 237: 236: 233: 230: 227: 206: 201: 200: 199: 190: 183: 182: 177: 174: 155: 148: 131: 125: 124: 116: 96: 73: 60: 43:produced by the 23: 16: 2984: 2983: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2864: 2863: 2792: 2781: 2714: 2672: 2654: 2652:2021 Population 2578:Upper Miramichi 2488: 2486: 2353: 2240: 2153:Rural districts 1958:Northumberland 1954:Band government 1950:Indian reserve 1818:Aberdeen Parish 1785: 1709:Rural community 1422:, specifically 1336: 1324:, specifically 1275: 1007:Rural community 908: 881: 837: 835: 624: 584: 581: 578: 575: 574: 537: 509: 506: 503: 500: 499: 469: 464: 462: 399: 396: 393: 390: 389: 369:Politics portal 367: 360: 340: 251:High-importance 234: 231: 228: 225: 224: 202: 197: 195: 176:High‑importance 175: 161: 132:on Knowledge's 129: 92: 12: 11: 5: 2982: 2980: 2972: 2971: 2966: 2961: 2956: 2951: 2946: 2941: 2936: 2931: 2926: 2921: 2916: 2911: 2906: 2901: 2896: 2891: 2886: 2881: 2876: 2866: 2865: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2780: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2713: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2653: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2629: 2625: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2576: 2573: 2570: 2567: 2564: 2561: 2558: 2555: 2552: 2549: 2546: 2543: 2540: 2534: 2527: 2526: 2485: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2461: 2460: 2427: 2426: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2372: 2352: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2295: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2272: 2271: 2239: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2220:adjustments). 2214: 2213: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2155: 2154: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2146: 2143: 2140: 2137: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2042:unincorporated 2015:FLC discussion 1966: 1965: 1962: 1959: 1956: 1951: 1948: 1944: 1943: 1940: 1937: 1934: 1931: 1928: 1922: 1921: 1918: 1915: 1912: 1909: 1906: 1900: 1899: 1896: 1893: 1890: 1887: 1884: 1880: 1879: 1876: 1873: 1870: 1867: 1864: 1858: 1857: 1854: 1851: 1848: 1845: 1842: 1836: 1835: 1832: 1829: 1826: 1823: 1820: 1814: 1813: 1812:Land area km2 1810: 1807: 1804: 1801: 1798: 1784: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1720: 1715: 1710: 1707: 1704: 1701: 1698: 1692: 1691: 1655: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1599: 1598: 1593: 1588: 1582: 1581: 1574: 1567: 1565:Municipalities 1561: 1560: 1556: 1555: 1551: 1550: 1547: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1482: 1416: 1415: 1412: 1409: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1364: 1361: 1358: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1348: 1345: 1340: 1337: 1334: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1303: 1300: 1297: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1287: 1284: 1279: 1278:Municipalities 1276: 1273: 1259: 1258: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1219: 1218: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1189: 1188: 1155:featured topic 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1025: 1022: 1019: 1016: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1005: 1002: 1001:Municipalities 930: 929: 926: 919: 907: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 876: 875: 846:Haut-Madawaska 834: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 826: 825: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 688: 687: 686: 685: 663: 662: 623: 620: 617: 616: 613: 612: 609: 608: 601:Low-importance 597: 591: 590: 588: 553: 541: 540: 538:Low‑importance 532: 520: 519: 516: 515: 513: 496:the discussion 475: 474: 458: 446: 445: 440: 428: 427: 424: 423: 416:Low-importance 412: 406: 405: 403: 386:the discussion 373: 372: 356: 344: 343: 341:Low‑importance 335: 323: 322: 319: 318: 309: 299: 298: 289: 279: 278: 269: 259: 258: 247: 241: 240: 238: 221:the discussion 208: 207: 191: 179: 178: 156: 144: 143: 137: 126: 112: 111: 108: 107: 104: 97: 89: 88: 85: 82: 78: 77: 69: 68: 61: 53: 52: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2981: 2970: 2967: 2965: 2962: 2960: 2957: 2955: 2952: 2950: 2947: 2945: 2942: 2940: 2937: 2935: 2932: 2930: 2927: 2925: 2922: 2920: 2917: 2915: 2912: 2910: 2907: 2905: 2902: 2900: 2897: 2895: 2892: 2890: 2887: 2885: 2882: 2880: 2877: 2875: 2872: 2871: 2869: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2806: 2802: 2797: 2796:the problem. 2790: 2786: 2778: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2738: 2734: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2711: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2687: 2683: 2676: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2651: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2630: 2626: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2612: 2608: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2577: 2574: 2571: 2568: 2565: 2562: 2559: 2556: 2553: 2550: 2547: 2544: 2541: 2538: 2537: 2535: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2492: 2483: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2459: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2436: 2432: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2414: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2363: 2359: 2350: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2323: 2319: 2314: 2313:interim lists 2310: 2309: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2250: 2246: 2237: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2191: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2152: 2147: 2144: 2141: 2138: 2135: 2134: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2128: 2127:this GNB page 2117: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2081:OpenStreetMap 2078: 2074: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2053: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1981: 1977: 1973: 1963: 1960: 1957: 1955: 1952: 1949: 1946: 1945: 1941: 1938: 1935: 1932: 1929: 1927: 1924: 1923: 1919: 1916: 1913: 1910: 1907: 1905: 1902: 1901: 1897: 1894: 1891: 1888: 1885: 1882: 1881: 1877: 1874: 1871: 1868: 1865: 1863: 1860: 1859: 1855: 1852: 1849: 1846: 1843: 1841: 1838: 1837: 1833: 1830: 1827: 1824: 1821: 1819: 1816: 1815: 1811: 1808: 1805: 1802: 1799: 1796: 1795: 1792: 1790: 1782: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1724: 1721: 1719: 1716: 1714: 1711: 1708: 1705: 1702: 1699: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1689: 1688: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1638: 1634: 1626: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1597: 1592: 1587: 1583: 1580: 1579: 1573: 1572: 1566: 1562: 1557: 1552: 1545: 1544: 1533: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1413: 1410: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1403: 1391: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1376: 1372: 1365: 1362: 1359: 1356: 1355: 1349: 1346: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1338: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1327: 1323: 1316: 1311: 1304: 1301: 1298: 1295: 1294: 1288: 1285: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1277: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1240: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1211: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1181: 1179: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1091: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1072: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1026: 1023: 1020: 1017: 1014: 1013: 1011: 1006: 1003: 1000: 999: 997: 996: 995: 991: 987: 983: 978: 977: 976: 972: 968: 964: 960: 955: 954: 953: 952: 948: 944: 940: 936: 927: 924: 920: 917: 916: 915: 913: 905: 899: 895: 891: 885: 880: 879: 878: 877: 874: 870: 866: 862: 861: 860: 859: 855: 851: 847: 841: 832: 824: 820: 816: 812: 807: 806: 805: 801: 797: 793: 789: 788:New Brunswick 785: 781: 777: 776: 775: 771: 767: 763: 762: 761: 760: 756: 752: 748: 744: 740: 736: 735: 731: 727: 722: 711: 707: 703: 698: 694: 693: 692: 691: 690: 689: 684: 680: 676: 671: 667: 666: 665: 664: 661: 657: 653: 648: 647: 646: 645: 641: 637: 633: 629: 621: 606: 602: 596: 593: 592: 589: 585:List articles 572: 568: 564: 560: 559: 554: 551: 547: 546: 542: 536: 533: 530: 526: 514: 497: 493: 489: 485: 481: 480: 472: 471:Cities portal 461: 459: 456: 452: 451: 447: 444: 441: 438: 434: 421: 417: 411: 408: 407: 404: 387: 383: 379: 378: 370: 364: 359: 357: 354: 350: 349: 345: 339: 336: 333: 329: 316: 315: 305: 301: 300: 296: 295: 285: 281: 280: 276: 275: 265: 261: 260: 256: 252: 246: 243: 242: 239: 222: 218: 214: 213: 205: 204:Canada portal 194: 192: 189: 185: 184: 180: 173: 169: 165: 164:New Brunswick 160: 157: 154: 150: 145: 141: 135: 127: 123: 118: 117: 105: 103: 102: 98: 95: 94:March 2, 2016 91: 90: 86: 83: 80: 79: 74: 70: 66: 62: 59: 55: 54: 50: 46: 42: 38: 37: 32: 31:featured list 28: 25: 22: 18: 17: 2798: 2782: 2715: 2655: 2609:at worst or 2566:New Maryland 2487: 2428: 2354: 2241: 2198: 2194: 2156: 2124: 2054: 2041: 2038:incorporated 2037: 2030: 1998: 1969: 1850:Restigouche 1786: 1662: 1658: 1612: 1595: 1590: 1585: 1577: 1576: 1570: 1569: 1564: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1518:municipality 1517: 1514:Municipality 1507: 1503: 1499: 1417: 1398: 1378: 1375:would not be 1374: 1318: 1265: 1150: 1092: 1075: 1069: 1067: 931: 909: 836: 796:47.54.11.193 737: 720: 718: 625: 600: 567:project page 556: 477: 415: 375: 312: 292: 272: 250: 210: 140:WikiProjects 99: 49:please do so 34: 26: 2554:Grand Manan 2085:Fredericton 1995:WP:NOTPAPER 1936:Gloucester 1862:Alma Parish 1809:Population 1803:Governance 1093:As for the 492:settlements 172:Communities 2868:Categories 2560:Memramcook 2542:Quispamsis 2539:Saint John 2450:Spooninpot 2416:Spooninpot 2398:Spooninpot 2358:Spooninpot 2311:StatCan’s 2159:Cornellier 2089:Cornellier 1991:WP:NOTDONE 1976:Cornellier 1737:Cornellier 1469:Cornellier 1443:Cornellier 1428:Cornellier 1248:Cornellier 1034:Cornellier 943:Cornellier 739:47.54.9.44 675:47.54.9.44 571:discussion 36:identified 2712:Citations 2675:RonCanada 2613:at best. 2548:Belledune 1972:WP:GNOMEs 1914:Victoria 1904:Aroostook 1840:Addington 1828:Carleton 1800:CSD type 1642:Mattximus 1447:Mattximus 967:Mattximus 890:Mattximus 865:Mattximus 840:Mattximus 815:Mattximus 784:Mattximus 766:Mattximus 743:Mattximus 726:Mattximus 670:WP:TRIVIA 636:Mattximus 628:WP:TRIVIA 168:Geography 2801:Mikeblas 2611:WP:SYNTH 2575:Tracadie 2545:Rothesay 2533:suffice. 2294:apply)." 2142:villages 1926:Bathurst 1911:Village 1908:Village 1889:Village 1886:Village 1596:Villages 1424:WP:SYNTH 1350:Villages 1326:WP:SYNTH 1289:Villages 1086:and the 1021:Villages 391:Politics 382:politics 338:Politics 130:FL-class 106:Promoted 2197:units; 2077:GEO_UID 1892:Albert 1878:222.62 1872:Albert 1866:Parish 1856:935.17 1844:Parish 1822:Parish 1806:County 1787:Thanks 1697:Village 1137:, and 1080:webpage 603:on the 418:on the 253:on the 84:Process 2563:Neguac 2557:McAdam 2195:census 2136:cities 2083:. See 1964:27.86 1942:92.04 1939:11897 1834:446.2 1718:parish 1713:county 1586:Cities 1504:aren't 1344:Cities 1283:Cities 1015:Cities 697:revert 501:Cities 484:cities 443:Cities 226:Canada 217:Canada 159:Canada 136:scale. 87:Result 2847:Hwy43 2833:Hwy43 2816:Hwy43 2761:Hwy43 2733:Hwy43 2696:Hwy43 2682:Hwy43 2615:Hwy43 2607:WP:OR 2569:Tracy 2516:Hwy43 2491:Hwy43 2318:Hwy43 2279:Hwy43 2245:Hwy43 2222:Hwy43 2177:Hwy43 2139:towns 2108:Hwy43 2057:Hwy43 1933:City 1930:City 1920:2.23 1898:47.6 1883:Alma 1797:Name 1789:Hwy43 1763:Hwy43 1637:Hwy43 1616:Hwy43 1591:Towns 1451:Hwy43 1426:". -- 1420:WP:OR 1381:Hwy43 1347:Towns 1322:WP:OR 1286:Towns 1226:Hwy43 1197:Hwy43 1163:Hwy43 1049:Hwy43 1018:Towns 986:Hwy43 884:Hwy43 850:Hwy43 792:Hwy43 780:Hwy43 751:Hwy43 702:Hwy43 652:Hwy43 576:Lists 535:Lists 488:towns 41:lists 29:is a 2851:talk 2837:talk 2820:talk 2805:talk 2787:and 2765:talk 2751:talk 2737:talk 2722:talk 2700:talk 2686:talk 2663:talk 2638:talk 2619:talk 2596:talk 2520:talk 2512:this 2501:talk 2472:talk 2454:talk 2435:talk 2420:talk 2402:talk 2384:talk 2362:talk 2337:talk 2322:talk 2303:talk 2283:talk 2265:talk 2249:talk 2226:talk 2207:talk 2181:talk 2163:talk 2112:talk 2093:talk 2061:talk 2040:and 2027:this 2023:this 2017:for 1980:talk 1917:306 1895:213 1869:LSD 1853:656 1847:LSD 1831:781 1825:LSD 1767:talk 1741:talk 1703:City 1700:Town 1671:talk 1646:talk 1620:talk 1528:and 1520:and 1490:talk 1473:talk 1467:. -- 1455:talk 1432:talk 1385:talk 1366:etc. 1305:etc. 1252:talk 1230:talk 1201:talk 1183:the 1167:talk 1068:The 1053:talk 1038:talk 990:talk 971:talk 947:talk 937:and 894:talk 869:talk 854:talk 819:talk 800:talk 770:talk 755:talk 741:and 730:talk 721:this 706:talk 679:talk 656:talk 640:talk 245:High 81:Date 2510:Is 2073:API 2025:to 1999:can 1961:48 1500:are 1441:Hi 595:Low 410:Low 2870:: 2853:) 2839:) 2822:) 2807:) 2767:) 2753:) 2739:) 2724:) 2702:) 2688:) 2665:) 2640:) 2621:) 2598:) 2522:) 2503:) 2474:) 2456:) 2448:? 2437:) 2422:) 2404:) 2396:? 2386:) 2364:) 2339:) 2324:) 2305:) 2285:) 2267:) 2251:) 2228:) 2209:) 2183:) 2165:) 2157:-- 2114:) 2095:) 2063:) 1993:, 1982:) 1875:5 1769:) 1743:) 1673:) 1648:) 1622:) 1492:) 1475:) 1457:) 1434:) 1387:) 1328:? 1254:) 1232:) 1203:) 1169:) 1157:, 1147:QC 1143:PE 1139:YK 1135:NU 1133:, 1131:NT 1129:, 1127:SK 1125:, 1123:ON 1121:, 1119:NS 1117:, 1115:NL 1113:, 1111:NB 1109:, 1107:MB 1105:, 1103:BC 1101:, 1099:AB 1055:) 1040:) 992:) 973:) 949:) 896:) 871:) 856:) 821:) 802:) 772:) 757:) 732:) 708:) 681:) 658:) 642:) 486:, 170:/ 166:/ 162:: 2849:( 2835:( 2818:( 2803:( 2763:( 2749:( 2735:( 2720:( 2698:( 2684:( 2677:: 2673:@ 2661:( 2636:( 2617:( 2594:( 2518:( 2499:( 2493:: 2489:@ 2470:( 2452:( 2433:( 2418:( 2400:( 2382:( 2360:( 2335:( 2320:( 2301:( 2281:( 2263:( 2247:( 2224:( 2205:( 2179:( 2161:( 2110:( 2091:( 2059:( 1978:( 1765:( 1739:( 1669:( 1644:( 1618:( 1488:( 1471:( 1453:( 1430:( 1383:( 1250:( 1228:( 1199:( 1165:( 1090:. 1051:( 1036:( 988:( 969:( 945:( 925:. 892:( 886:: 882:@ 867:( 852:( 842:: 838:@ 817:( 798:( 768:( 753:( 728:( 704:( 677:( 654:( 638:( 607:. 573:. 422:. 317:. 297:. 277:. 257:. 142:: 51:.

Index

Featured list
featured list
identified
lists
Knowledge community
please do so
Main Page trophy
Today's featured list
March 2, 2016
Featured list candidate

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Canada
New Brunswick
Geography
Communities
WikiProject icon
Canada portal
WikiProject Canada
Canada
the discussion
High
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
WikiProject New Brunswick
Taskforce icon
WikiProject Geography of Canada
Taskforce icon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑