Talk:List of natural horror films

2586:, perhaps the epitome of a "shark movie", isn't categorized as such. Can you provide sources that list films as "shark movies"? If you're serious about this, I think you'd have more luck creating a category, especially given that there's currently less than 20 films listed for sharks here. I'm also not really sure what qualifications you're concerned about, since as far as I'm aware the only significant criterion for inclusion here is a source that lists the film as a "natural horror" film...that doesn't sound like a huge hurdle to me. 2626:(which, given the number of films I've seen removed from this list appears to be quite a hurdle, indeed). All a film needed to be for the original list was to be about a "killer shark", which, it should be clear, is a sub-genre all its own and easily demonstrated for any film to be included. And, yes, a category is nice (there is one - Films about shark attacks, which mentions "list of killer shark films" as its "main article"), but a proper list will have more information than a category can provide. 265: 170: 244: 149: 71: 53: 22: 81: 2617:- "For some, just the thought of these ocean-dwelling creatures with teeth to spare is enough to keep people from swimming in any open waters, but movies like The Meg show that they're still popular cinema subject matter. Jaws, in particular, managed to forever terrify the world almost 50 years ago, but it's far from the only shark attack-based fright film in existence." 341: 1624:. As the Cambridge Dictionary puts it, nature is "all the animals, plants, rocks, etc. in the world and all the features, forces, and processes that happen or exist independently of people". This does not include extraterrestrial life. Furthermore, there are no reliable sources that have been added to support extraterrestrials being a component of natural horror. – 2420:

other hand, if it's pertinent, why only one title? If the original Godzilla is a fair inclusion, then all Godzilla films are. Multiple sections include sequels and/or list each entry of a franchise. Why not Godzilla? More so, why is Godzilla the only mentioned "dinosaur"? (Not even being one). What with an entire popular franchise being devoted to dinosaurs.

2388: 2607:- "Admit it: most of us are at least a little scared of swimming in the ocean, and that's probably because we've been traumatized by all those ocean disaster films and shark attack movies (why my 5th-grade teacher thought Jaws would be a fun field trip watch is a mystery to me—I am scarred for life). Also, why are there so many of them?!?" 2674:

Given that there was a previous list article that was subsequently merged to this one because it was felt there wasn't enough substantive content for a standalone list...and based on the state of that article at the time it was merged, I would agree with that assessment...if you're serious about this

2120:

Disregarding calling cavemen and dinosaurs co-existing "fantasy", of course sources are not redundant, generally speaking, however in regards to an article such as this one sources are hardly necessary and precisely do seem redundant, and rather than remove most of the content (which clearly fits the

1795:

Furthermore, as the list includes films featuring killer plants, the lead should reflect that. In fact, now that I read it over more carefully, the lead should contain information beyond even that. At present, the films' antagonists are defined as "mutated beasts, carnivorous insects, and/or normally

1612:

An argument has arose regarding whether or not films featuring extraterrestrial animal antagonists should be included. At present, such a factor is not within the inclusion criteria detailed in the article's lead sentence. The IP editor who has challenged this notion has disregarded my advice to hold

1453:

is repeated a few times within the list, falling under the sections for amphibians, arachnids, birds, lizards, snakes, and turtles and tortoises. Perhaps films such as this should be included into a section for miscellaneous titles, or perhaps be listed under the section which best suits them (which,

1359:

is considered to fall within this list. I'm somewhat surprised to see the Cloverfield monster on this list, given that it appears to be of extraterrestrial origins and as such, would not be something that I'd think of as a natural monster. If the decision is to include an extraterrestrial creature if

816:

I'm still waiting for some kind of response about this. I listed three citations, more than the one that was used to hijack the term "eco-horror." Everything on this page should be listed under eco-horror. What reminded me to even come and look again was seeing a former writer for Rue Morgue Magazine

744:

What are being referred to as "natural horror films" have traditionally been called "eco horror" going back as far as I can remember. The documentaries being listed by wiki as "eco-horror" seem to be highjacking the name of that pre-existing subgenre. I don't know anything about editing wiki entries,

541:

is fully referenced. Please provide completed inline references for every content addition to maintain its quality. When adding to the list please note the quality requirements stated in the comment for each section. Those requirements can of course evolve like anything else with consensus but I will

2419:

I see there's been debate in the past as to what to include in this page, but I don't think a consensus has ever been reached. In regard to Godzilla, is it really reasonable to consider it a "natural horror" film? It's not even any specific animal in a mutated form, it's entirely fantastical. On the

2625:

As I stated, there are less than twenty films listed here because this article has a specific focus that is much more tightly defined than the original list article I'm talking about. That list had 48 shark movies on it, many that aren't allowed here because they aren't considered "natural horror"

503:

I have updated the article to reflect this reference and will continue to look for references for the fictional use of eco-horror or natural horror. Contributions from other editors welcome, naturally. We need to find reliable sources which predate the creation of this article: there are of course

2010:

the last time I reinstated the removal of the unsourced items, would one of you be willing to reinstate said removal, as I feel we have a reasonable consensus here and it's been a sufficient amount of time for other editors to weigh in? If not, I'm willing to do it again as long as I'll have your

1950:

To add on, the more narrow a genre classification is, the less likely that a related list will capture all potentially related films. For the main genres, it is largely pretty easy to verify and source a film because many databases identify a film's main genre(s). However, something like "natural

522:

by, for example, Allrovi. I will rename the list accordingly, split off the documentaries to a new list with the old name, crosslink the two lists and do any more immediate tidying up. I will then remove the inuse tags. A second stage of editing can move or copy appropriate films from the natural

1714:

Well, the more popular terms for "natural horror films" are killer animal movies or creature features. And yes, movies featuring extraterrestrial versions of animals are listed. Also, the most important part is not the monsters being "natural". For example, mutations are listed and they are not

462:

I thought it would be a good idea to have a reference for the term "eco-horror". Unfortunately the most reliable one I have found so far says "Unlike most horror films these movies aren't fiction, they are serious documentaries tackling the big issues of our time. But the message is still: Be

396:

Hi guys. Sorry about not being able to edit this post very well, I'm a bit new to this. I would just like to inform the maker of this page has missed out a few movies, and I would like to contribute, but as I said, I'm not very good at all about editing, plus, I'm not sure if some of them are

2602:- "Since "Jaws" first appeared on movie screens back in 1975, audiences have been captivated by sharks. Since then, we've seen a whole shiver of shark movies from intense thrillers and pulpy horror flicks, to ridiculous monster movies featuring the massive (and mercifully extinct) Megalodon." 2370:

Because this distinction has been made, should the parenthetical “(also known as creature features)” at the beginning of the page be removed? It implies that creature horror and natural horror are synonymous; moreover, the source does not equate creature features and natural horror. If the

858:

Since I recommended you ask that question on this talk page, I suppose I'll throw in my two cents due to a lack of other answers. Personally I don't think werewolf films should be included, as they tend to involve heavy supernatural elements, rather than mutation or other biological causes.

952:

as a horror film, while others, myself included, consider it a thriller. Basically, I'm questioning the article's title. Perhaps it should be renamed "List of killer animal films", though I believe it may have already had that name some time ago (plus that name does sound a bit juvenile).

1819:

Considering film genres are subjective and that this article's inclusion criteria can be interpreted in several different ways, citations are the key to the list's reliability. The nature of the films in the list should be defined as clearly as possible. On what grounds would doing so be

2101:

it is questionable that it is even a horror film, and it is debatable whether its fantasy premise (cavemen and dinosaurs co-existing) disqualifies it even though dinosaurs are of the natural world. That is one film I could go either way on, which is why good sourcing is essential.

1522:

Why do you propose that they should be listed in multiple categories? Adding them into the "miscellaneous" section shortens the number of repeated citations, and makes it easier anyhow to find citations to back up the films listed. It's also more concise and organised for readers.

1030:

be included for their creatures (e.g. Shelob, Aragog, etc.)? The list currently contains films featuring dragons, an Aztec god, and Bigfoot, to name a few. As these are either mythological or cryptozoological, where does the line cross in terms of being a "natural horror film"?

1354:

does mention that a list should still need to be verifiable via sourcing. In this case it'd probably be a good idea to show sourcing to back up the claims that the movie has a mutated critter as its main protagonist. It'd also be a good idea to identify exactly

1926:"In cases where the membership criteria are subjective or likely to be disputed (for example, lists of unusual things or terrorist incidents), it is especially important that inclusion be based on reliable sources given with inline citations for each item." 488:

The list currently only has fiction films as far as I can see, so we need one or more reliable references to justify its current contents or the other use of "eco-horror" and one or more sections for the documentary films referred to in the CNN article.

2044:

Thanks Erik. I concur with your assessment, and also hope that any editors opposed to the removal (KaijuFan or otherwise) will bring their concerns here. Time permitting (not today, maybe next week) I'll see if I can start digging into Betty's source.

778:

The preceding links are just 3 of the many, many references that predate the creation of the natural horror and eco-horror wiki pages and refer to the films wiki has categorized as "natural horror" as the more commonly used and accepted "eco-horror."

2463:

The movies "Jurassic Park" and "Carnosaur" should be included at "Dinosaurs", because they are actually Natural Horror movies antagonized by dinosaurs. And King Kong should be included at "primates", because it's about a giant ape who attacks people.

1380:

I've protected the page for three days. This is not entirely an endorsement of the current version or the sourcing requirements - my last post was mostly to say that it's not an unreasonable request to ask for reliable sourcing. I'm going to tag

609:. The topic of killer animal films is better and more expansively covered in this article than any of the others. I don’t quite see the value of listing them with each animal assigned their own individual pages, except to be used as redirects. -- 1154:

Unless someone's able to find a policy that excludes lists from having citations, then that list should have citations. Other lists on Knowledge have citations, and thus, consistency should win over someone simply saying "not needed".

1651:: They are killer versions of real-life animals. They do qualify. They're monstrous versions of real-life animals, and thus fit the description. Also, some of the are the same as their real-life counterparts, like the dinosaurs from 1955:(which is both prose and list) has sourced listings and would probably be longer if we went with an I-call-it-as-I-see-it mentality. By using sources, we can point to something beyond the editors' own opinions for justification. 2435:

It is reasonable to include a film that is reliably sourced as a "natural horror", certainly as starting point in a discussion. While the creature may be "fantastical" in its depiction, the original film is allegorical as

2693:

I'll consider it. But I may just do it, anyway. It's an old discussion from a decade ago, decided by four people, so I don't really feel bound by it. If I put the list back, it will be at least as well sourced as this

1775:

first?), this issue probably needs to be addressed. Every citation listed in the article discusses natural horror films with organisms as the primary or secondary antagonist. That's what differentiates something like

1687:: The sources listed in the article have all essentially supported the current criteria. Are there any sources you can find that include mention of films with extraterrestrial animal antagonists as "natural horror"? – 924:

As natural horror is a subgenre of horror films, it would be reasonable that the films listed in this article be of the horror genre. However, some of the films listed are not technically horror films. For example,

2241:

content just creates a problem that has to be fixed down the line. I would have done the same as Doniago in his shoes. If you add back the titles with reliable sources I am sure there will not be a problem.

2562:

as just that, a list of films about killer sharks, without all of the qualifications apparently necessary to be included here. "Shark movies" are a sub-genre unto themselves, so I think it is justified.

824: 366:

for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution.

2491:, the accompanying source describes it as "natural horror", and this is further expanded on in the section above. If we removed it based on our own subjective opinion then that would constitute 2121:

bill) it would seem more reasonable to deal with every single movie separately. As far as entries like "Lord of the Rings" and "Monster Squad" goes, these clearly do not belong in this article.

189:

and other media on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the

1385:

in this since I don't see where anyone has, although I would like to point out that MorbidEntree is not an admin. However that said, one does not need to be an admin to do edits on Knowledge.

413:

Now, sorry about this last one, because i don't the exact name, but it's something similar to "Into the Web". It's a movie about poisonous spiders. Sorry, I don't have a link to this one.

2751:

It's not up to us as editors to determine if a film is eligible, just whether it is properly sourced. I suggest looking through some of the films on the list to see what is needed.

377:

I believe the subgenre of natural horror should have its main page, since this is only a list of films belonging to this subgenre. Many subgenres have their own pages on this wiki.

960:" defines the genre as "seeking to elicit a negative emotional reaction from viewers by playing on the audience's primal fears". Therefore, having something like the kid-friendly 2582:. Either one of these would make me more optimistic about the idea that breaking out the sharks to their own list article was a good idea. I also checked AllMovie, and even 2530:

In theory xenobiology horror could come under science-fiction, creature features, and natural horror, but it really depends on the themes of the film itself. In this case,

2062:

I don't see the point of removing all that content, it simply makes no sense. I support keeping the unsourced content, as citing sources seems incredibly redundant here.

1055:

I agree. supernatural monsters shouldn't be included, only natural ones and mutations. However, I think Bigfoot counts as a natural creature, rather than supernatural --

2337:

because it's main antagonists are giant man-eating worms that travel underground, but it is technically a comedy. I'm soliciting opinions on its inclusion here. Thanks

359: 1010:

I think that there should be an established criteria for the inclusion of films in this list, and that it should be approved by several editors. For example, should

817:

and the former editor of Fangoria (so someone that knows horror sub genres well) speaking about eco-horror using the established meaning it's had for decades now.

2610: 2558:

As this list seems to have a specific remit ("natural horror"), rather than being a list of horror films featuring particular animals, I propose re-establishing

896:, but I will be taking greater effort to improve the article and I ask that you discuss changes with me rather than simply reverting all of my work. Thank you. – 2620: 1083: 2733:

Also under the Spider subtitle I would like to submit: 1. Spiders (2000) no Knowledge link; and 2. Spiders II: Breeding ground (2001) no Knowledge link.

2722:

Thank you to the creator/editor of this webpage. I am a horror movie afficionado and under the Shark subtitle I would like to submit: 1. Megalodon (2004)

1951:

horror" is not going to pop up as often, and we should be wary of listing a film because we personally think it meets the definition. To use an example,

1621: 191: 432: 1893:

Is it reasonable to include films on this list simply because they have their own articles, or should they be required to have a citation as well?

2944: 1897:

favors the latter option, but I'm not keen on starting that level of clean-up if I'm going to hit a wall of opposition. Thanks for your thoughts.

226: 216: 767: 504:

lots of copies of the unsourced wikipedia content which illustrates the importance of providing reliable sources at the time content is added. --

1824:? If citations don't list natural horror films as being without primary natural antagonists, then why should we leave it up to interpretation? – 2371:

parenthetical remains it follows logically that creature horror should be listed here, because there is no separate page for creature horror.--

319: 2959: 309: 518:

I found some refs clarifying the use of the term eco-horror. It is clear that many if not most of the films in this list are categorised as

469: 2949: 1784: 1118: 1056: 991: 786: 752: 416:

But yeah, that's it. Again, this is a great page, so good job to whoever did it, and I hope my additions are helpful, and easy to put up.

1070:

But the article for Bigfoot defines it as "a mythological simian, ape, or hominid-like creature". It's also frequently considered to be a

1184:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Knowledge:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=722077551#Is_IMDB_a_reliable_source.3F

2964: 2939: 2338: 1978: 1744: 1716: 1670: 1567: 1501: 1481: 1325: 1252: 1187: 1140: 844: 444: 2167:

Some of the movies were listed alphabetically, some in release year. I've placed them all in chronological order under their subgenre.

2934: 828: 378: 363: 2186:

This eems a very limited list, unless there are stricter grounds for inclusion than the description implies. Probably about half of

1613:

a consensus on the issue, and so I've created the consensus meeting thusly. Here is my reasoning against extraterrestrial inclusion:

2954: 2929: 2695: 2661: 2627: 2564: 2026:

I've reverted the restoration of unsourced content. I would support using Betty's source to re-include films with inline citations.

1251:

If you want citations, fine. Go through the previous revisions and get them yourself. I am not going through all that work again. --

285: 2520: 2205:

If there are reliable sources that classify them thusly, I guess I'd be curious to hear an argument against inclusion. Cheers.

99: 2578:

Is there an article that discusses shark movies as a sub-genre? I couldn't readily find one, nor could I find a category for

939: 927: 745:

but a simple google search of "eco horror" will turn up page after page of results for the more common use of "eco horror."

729: 686: 606: 583: 2612:- "After over four decades since the movie "Jaws" was released and over 100 shark movies, people's fear of sharks remains." 2469: 2352:

If sources are available which categorise it as "natural horror" then it should be added, otherwise it should be left out.

700:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

111: 103: 1593:(1933) in the "Dinosaurs" section, since the explorers do battle with numerous dinosaurs before they find the big guy. 347: 177: 154: 33: 2492: 2465: 281: 277: 272: 249: 2679:

to demonstrate that a separate list article could be viable, with content that elevates it beyond a barebones list.

709:

Similar to the above proposal, I think that killer insects should be added to this article based on the same logic.

2559: 2516: 2035: 1964: 1941: 1026: 602: 598: 107: 94: 58: 2085:

are not "natural horror" films by any definition (they aren't even horror films for a start!), and something like

428: 2480: 956:

It's just a bit odd to me that certain films are listed in an article with such a title. The Knowledge page for "

725: 579: 2741: 2605: 2081:

requires that they are added when claims are challenged. Many of the entries on the list are extremely dubious:

2579: 2376: 1863: 1598: 1122: 1060: 995: 538: 351: 2479:

Films can be characterized in many different ways so will only be added if contributors are able to provide a

1737:

also, aliens are technically natural creatures of other worlds. However, I do agree with you that movies like

1281:

Alrighty. It'll take a while, but I'll go ahead and start to organise a draft to update the page with later. –

790: 768:

http://twitchfilm.com/2008/07/twitch-o-meter-the-implacable-lightness-of-being-5-eco-horror-films-for-our.html

756: 443:

Why were my entries removed sure they weren't very well known but they were real films and I was stating facts

2437: 424: 2484: 2342: 1854: 1837: 1748: 1720: 1700: 1674: 1637: 1571: 1536: 1505: 1485: 1467: 1329: 1294: 1256: 1229: 1209: 1191: 1168: 1144: 1107: 1088: 1044: 979: 909: 872: 848: 614: 448: 2737: 990:

i think they're listed because they feature killer animals in the same style as a "natural horror film". --

1982: 1500:

The "miscellaneous" section should be removed and those movies should be listed in multiple categories. --

1424: 1117:

Bigfoot is still not a supernatural entity. Cryptids are natural creatures that may or may not be real. --

893: 629: 407:

Eye of the Beast, which is an awesome movie about an octopus, which I think is mollusk, but I'm not sure.

382: 2771: 2372: 2756: 2699: 2665: 2651: 2631: 2568: 2543: 2500: 2448: 2425: 2400: 2361: 2292: 2247: 2107: 1994: 1389: 1364: 1351: 1213: 537:

The move and split are now complete. The section for fictional eco-horror films is currently empty. The

39: 1917: 1418: 1382: 624:

Agreed on the transfer. Not enough impact of these specific animals to warrant their individual lists.

2752: 2647: 2539: 2496: 2444: 2396: 2357: 2288: 2243: 2103: 1990: 2483:

that describes them as "natural horror". This isn't a matter of editorial opinion, it is a matter of

1137:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_natural_horror_films&diff=prev&oldid=722075371

1021: 933: 820: 782: 748: 646: 420: 2880: 2848: 2811: 2775: 770: 2884: 2852: 2815: 2779: 2643: 2306: 2275: 2224: 1859: 1653: 1594: 1413:

site). If it had sources from a better site(s), then I wouldn't have reverted it. And thank you to

2287:

categorise it as "sci-fi horror", which is a different sub-genre. This is why sources are needed.

2284: 2356:

categorise it as a "creature" horror rather than a "natural" horror, which is a different genre.

2172: 2126: 2067: 1878: 1842: 1827: 1690: 1627: 1526: 1457: 1350:

It's not unreasonable to request that a page has citations when it's something very specific, as

1284: 1219: 1158: 1097: 1034: 969: 899: 862: 806: 714: 680: 663: 610: 547: 528: 509: 494: 773: 542:"probably" remove list entries which do not conform to the requirement when they are created. -- 1743:(which doesn't really feature a "monster" version of a real-life animal) should not qualify. -- 1216:). The page still needs references, just not from IMDb, because IMDB isn't a reliable source. – 2898: 2870: 2862: 2833: 2798: 2684: 2591: 2261: 2210: 2148: 2050: 2016: 1902: 1665: 889: 625: 2893:

I'd recommmend looking at some of the sources currently used in the article for inspiration.

2421: 2195: 2078: 1913: 1414: 1386: 1361: 1012: 2902: 2888: 2874: 2856: 2837: 2819: 2802: 2783: 2760: 2745: 2703: 2688: 2676: 2669: 2655: 2635: 2595: 2572: 2547: 2524: 2504: 2473: 2452: 2429: 2404: 2380: 2365: 2346: 2310: 2296: 2279: 2265: 2251: 2228: 2214: 2199: 2176: 2152: 2136: 2130: 2111: 2071: 2054: 2039: 2020: 1998: 1974: 1968: 1945: 1906: 1894: 1882: 1867: 1752: 1724: 1705: 1678: 1642: 1602: 1575: 1541: 1509: 1489: 1472: 1436: 1405:

A quick comment: My reason for reverting that edit was because of it having poor sources (

1396: 1371: 1333: 1299: 1260: 1234: 1195: 1173: 1148: 1126: 1112: 1064: 1049: 999: 984: 962: 914: 877: 852: 832: 810: 794: 760: 733: 718: 690: 667: 650: 642: 633: 618: 587: 551: 532: 513: 498: 452: 436: 386: 2459:

Jurassic Park, Carnosaur and King Kong should be included and Godzilla should be removed

1986: 2334: 2302: 2271: 2220: 2031: 1960: 1937: 1806: 658:

There isn't enough of a difference between these genres to warrant separate articles.

186: 2531: 2923: 2270:

Indeed. 'Giant Spider Invasion' just shouts out rom-com. Best to avoid any confusion.

2168: 2122: 2063: 1952: 1921: 1874: 1772: 1659: 1431: 1324:

The article doesn't need to be re-written. just add the citations it used to have. --

888:

You are continuously removing my edits to the article, even when doing so disregards

802: 710: 676: 659: 543: 524: 505: 490: 2789:

What's your point? If you feel the film should be added to this list, you'll need a

2894: 2866: 2829: 2825: 2794: 2790: 2680: 2587: 2257: 2206: 2144: 2046: 2012: 1932:

a monstrous creature does not immediately equate it being a "natural horror film".

1898: 1449: 801:

Hi. I have just seen this and will respond as time permits in the next few days. --

397:

plausible. (Whoever made the page, you guys did a really fantastic job by the way)

2143:

necessary precisely to avoid debates over whether a film belongs in this article.

2615: 2219:

Looks like another page jealously guarded by an over-zealous 'owner'. I'll avoid.

1715:

really "natural". The most important part is that they feature killer animals. --

98:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can 2600: 2583: 2353: 2191: 2089:

contains fantasy horror rather than natural horror. I even find entries such as

1778: 1739: 957: 948: 182: 181:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in 86: 2808: 2187: 1812: 1360:

it resembles an entity on earth, then that should be spelled out in the lead.

76: 70: 52: 1663:. They are just natural creatures from other worlds. Like the arachnids from 1480:

I think it should be listed multiple times. I don't see a problem with it. --

2027: 1956: 1933: 1589: 264: 243: 169: 148: 1973:

I concur with Doniago and Erik. Sometimes it is very obvious (such as with

1788:, which happens to have bats in it. There's not a single source that cites 2723: 2097:

questionable too because they are highly speculative. With something like

340: 2845: 2843: 1212:, which is generally never considered a reliable source (there's even an 115: 597:

I'm proposing that three different subarticles be merged into this one;

408: 401: 1071: 1017: 2646:

to me. If you permit a list of killer shark films where does it end?

1792:

or another movie of that description as being a natural horror film.

1410: 1804:

wouldn't fit this criteria. Nor would its sequels, nor would 1925's

1782:, featuring a shark that clearly kills people, from something like 1078: 2774:

is a killer kangaroo movie starring Rippy, a mad zombie kangaroo!

400:

Um, first off is a movie called Maneater, which can be seen here:

1132:

An administrator removed the citations because they were unneeded

771:

http://cinefantastiqueonline.com/2008/06/cybersurfing-eco-horror/

675:- shark films are a specific and notable topic/list on their own 1406: 724:

I have merged that article along with the three proposed above.

1669:. There's also no rule against having extraterrestrial life. -- 946:

Granted, a film genre is a subjective topic. Some people view

335: 15: 2237:

content takes the article in the right direction, but adding

1985:. Some of these entries may be sourceable through Allmovie's 1608:

The inclusion of films featuring extraterrestrial antagonists

937:, a science fiction adventure film with horror elements; and 774:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=91485965

843:

Should werewolf films be listed in the "Canines" section? --

284:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 2395:. While there is a huge overlap they are not synonymous. 1800:? As great white sharks aren't harmless to humans, then 523:

horror list to a new eco-horror list fiction section. --

2727: 2007: 1821: 1768: 1183: 1136: 966:

appearing in a list of such a subgenre seems strange. –

355: 1454:

in this case, I think would likely be "amphibians"). –

2622:- "Shark Movies: A Dull History with One Exception" 1020:

are reptile-bird hybrids? Should the film series of

571:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

2793:that discusses the film as a natural horror film. 1796:harmless animals turned into killers". What about 2675:suggestion, I'd suggest that you put together a 1182:The administrators agreed to remove it, though. 2809:THE RED | Official Trailer (NEW 2024) - YouTube 2515:like Annhilation? should that be on this list? 114:. To improve this article, please refer to the 2724:https://en.wikipedia.org/Megalodon_(2004_film) 1977:), but there are many dubious entries such as 1912:I endorse removing the unsourced content. The 641:content is better served in a single article. 2660:It ends with a more comprehensive Knowledge. 1620:: Alien creatures should be reserved for the 574:A summary of the conclusions reached follows. 8: 1767:Welp, seeing as how I've just been called a 1208:That's just because the citations were from 373:Natural horror should have its own main page 578:The result of this discussion was to merge 276:, an attempt to structure and organize all 818: 470:"Eco-horror films shocking us into action" 238: 143: 110:. To use this banner, please refer to the 47: 21: 19: 2538:as a horror, let alone a natural horror. 1920:to restore the content with sources. Per 1622:list of films featuring extraterrestrials 404:Which is a movie about a Bengal tiger. 280:. If you wish to help, please visit the 1558:I don't think citations are needed for 1443:Films with multiple natural antagonists 240: 195:to talk over new ideas and suggestions. 145: 49: 2846:https://www.imdb.com/title/tt22306090/ 2190:output could go in here, for a start. 1928:This is definitely subjective. A film 825:2602:306:CD17:D380:3513:BC47:98D5:8267 7: 565:The following discussion is closed. 409:http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0867286/ 402:http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0846713/ 270:This article is within the scope of 175:This article is within the scope of 92:This article is within the scope of 1979:The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug 1848:Flying monkeys in THE WIZARD OF OZ? 1566:since they have wikipedia pages. -- 38:It is of interest to the following 2077:Sources are not redundant because 14: 2011:support if it goes badly for me. 1763:Conflicts over the article's lead 2728:https://en.wikipedia.org/The_Meg 2386: 2083:The Lord of the Rings/The Hobbit 696:The discussion above is closed. 339: 263: 242: 168: 147: 108:regional and topical task forces 79: 69: 51: 20: 943:, a historical survival drama. 314:This article has been rated as 221:This article has been rated as 2945:Low-importance horror articles 2215:14:25, 30 September 2019 (UTC) 2200:15:48, 28 September 2019 (UTC) 2055:20:42, 28 September 2018 (UTC) 2040:19:52, 28 September 2018 (UTC) 2021:12:56, 28 September 2018 (UTC) 1999:18:33, 26 September 2018 (UTC) 1969:13:16, 26 September 2018 (UTC) 1946:12:53, 26 September 2018 (UTC) 1576:00:53, 10 September 2016 (UTC) 705:Merger Proposal Killer Insects 607:List of killer crocodile films 468:Ford, Matt (22 October 2008). 1: 2511:What about xenobiology horror 2182:List /Criteria for inclusion? 1852:Should the flying monkeys in 1843:21:36, 8 September 2016 (UTC) 1542:21:25, 9 September 2016 (UTC) 1510:18:13, 9 September 2016 (UTC) 920:On the title "natural horror" 691:20:55, 3 September 2013 (UTC) 552:00:03, 4 September 2011 (UTC) 533:20:20, 3 September 2011 (UTC) 2960:Low-importance List articles 2761:06:36, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 2746:04:55, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 2548:21:14, 1 November 2021 (UTC) 2525:20:18, 1 November 2021 (UTC) 2405:01:59, 16 October 2021 (UTC) 2381:01:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC) 2366:02:12, 10 January 2020 (UTC) 2153:18:53, 10 October 2018 (UTC) 2131:17:29, 10 October 2018 (UTC) 2112:00:22, 10 October 2018 (UTC) 1873:They were hardly 'natural.' 1868:09:52, 28 January 2018 (UTC) 1603:09:50, 28 January 2018 (UTC) 1079:Knowledge's list of cryptids 892:. I do not want to start an 884:In regards to 24.184.132.160 348:List of natural horror films 201:Knowledge:WikiProject Horror 2950:WikiProject Horror articles 2505:23:37, 9 October 2021 (UTC) 2474:22:02, 9 October 2021 (UTC) 2466:Gabriel Rodrigues Loschiavo 2453:15:40, 11 August 2021 (UTC) 2430:14:17, 11 August 2021 (UTC) 2347:21:04, 9 January 2020 (UTC) 2177:22:03, 12 August 2019 (UTC) 2072:15:56, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 1907:19:11, 30 August 2018 (UTC) 1883:07:08, 25 August 2019 (UTC) 1753:12:48, 29 August 2016 (UTC) 1725:12:45, 29 August 2016 (UTC) 1706:09:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC) 1679:01:24, 29 August 2016 (UTC) 1643:00:32, 29 August 2016 (UTC) 1490:13:39, 28 August 2016 (UTC) 1473:21:05, 25 August 2016 (UTC) 1437:10:56, 25 August 2016 (UTC) 1397:10:38, 25 August 2016 (UTC) 1372:10:36, 25 August 2016 (UTC) 1334:01:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC) 1300:01:19, 20 August 2016 (UTC) 1261:01:12, 20 August 2016 (UTC) 1235:01:06, 20 August 2016 (UTC) 1196:01:03, 20 August 2016 (UTC) 1174:01:02, 20 August 2016 (UTC) 1149:00:59, 20 August 2016 (UTC) 1084:National Geographic article 931:is a science fiction film; 811:23:04, 11 August 2014 (UTC) 734:22:24, 11 August 2014 (UTC) 719:14:25, 27 August 2013 (UTC) 668:14:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC) 619:16:24, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 588:22:24, 11 August 2014 (UTC) 514:23:14, 28 August 2011 (UTC) 499:00:28, 28 August 2011 (UTC) 294:Knowledge:WikiProject Lists 204:Template:WikiProject Horror 2981: 2965:WikiProject Lists articles 2940:List-Class horror articles 2903:18:31, 4 August 2024 (UTC) 2889:18:11, 4 August 2024 (UTC) 2875:16:56, 4 August 2024 (UTC) 2857:08:08, 4 August 2024 (UTC) 2838:01:49, 4 August 2024 (UTC) 2820:16:12, 3 August 2024 (UTC) 2803:15:20, 3 August 2024 (UTC) 2784:12:21, 3 August 2024 (UTC) 2560:List of killer shark films 2554:Re-establishing older list 2311:23:33, 16 April 2020 (UTC) 2297:20:36, 16 April 2020 (UTC) 2280:20:24, 16 April 2020 (UTC) 2266:19:40, 16 April 2020 (UTC) 2252:19:22, 16 April 2020 (UTC) 2229:18:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC) 1771:(could you take a look at 853:01:14, 29 April 2016 (UTC) 603:List of killer shark films 599:List of killer snake films 387:00:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC) 320:project's importance scale 297:Template:WikiProject Lists 227:project's importance scale 192:general Project discussion 124:Knowledge:WikiProject Film 2935:WikiProject Film articles 2704:21:51, 27 July 2022 (UTC) 2689:13:25, 27 July 2022 (UTC) 2670:00:40, 27 July 2022 (UTC) 2656:03:54, 21 July 2022 (UTC) 2636:00:40, 27 July 2022 (UTC) 2596:03:03, 21 July 2022 (UTC) 2580:Films about killer sharks 2573:00:09, 21 July 2022 (UTC) 1065:01:19, 29 June 2016 (UTC) 1050:01:08, 29 June 2016 (UTC) 1000:19:18, 28 June 2016 (UTC) 985:04:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC) 915:05:16, 26 June 2016 (UTC) 878:06:26, 26 June 2016 (UTC) 833:12:22, 30 July 2016 (UTC) 795:15:59, 30 July 2014 (UTC) 761:06:18, 30 July 2014 (UTC) 634:19:20, 7 April 2013 (UTC) 453:01:22, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 437:21:37, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 313: 258: 220: 163: 127:Template:WikiProject Film 64: 46: 2955:List-Class List articles 2930:List-Class film articles 2842:What about this, then?: 1447:I noticed that the film 1127:01:50, 2 July 2016 (UTC) 1113:01:15, 2 July 2016 (UTC) 698:Please do not modify it. 651:16:54, 28 May 2013 (UTC) 568:Please do not modify it. 539:list of eco-horror films 352:List of eco-horror films 2534:does not even describe 2256:Just so. Thanks Betty! 2008:threatened with a block 940:In the Heart of the Sea 278:list pages on Knowledge 2726:and 2. The Meg (2018) 2301:😂😂😂 lockdown laughs 1983:Leprechaun 4: In Space 28:This article is rated 2517:Likeanechointheforest 1022:Tolkien's legendarium 2493:WP:Original research 2135:I rather agree with 2099:One Million Years BC 1762: 1430:(please reply using 1425:Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥ 1016:be included, as the 726:The Legendary Ranger 580:The Legendary Ranger 358:. The former page's 2824:A trailer is not a 2772:The Red (2024 film) 2487:. As for the first 2333:I was going to add 2163:Chronological order 1654:Planet of Dinosaurs 1587:I am cross-listing 1089:Mentalfloss article 458:Eco-horror subgenre 364:provide attribution 356:2011-09-03T22:29:51 100:join the discussion 2481:WP:Reliable source 1564:Day of the Animals 1006:Inclusion criteria 928:Planet of the Apes 425:Cyclone of despair 178:WikiProject Horror 34:content assessment 2087:The Monster Squad 2006:Given that I was 1666:Starship Troopers 1435: 835: 823:comment added by 785:comment added by 751:comment added by 740:Allrovi is wrong. 440: 423:comment added by 370: 369: 334: 333: 330: 329: 326: 325: 273:WikiProject Lists 237: 236: 233: 232: 142: 141: 138: 137: 102:and see lists of 2972: 2738:Savinien d C d B 2485:WP:Verifiability 2394: 2390: 2389: 1855:The Wizard of Oz 1841: 1830: 1704: 1693: 1641: 1630: 1540: 1529: 1471: 1460: 1429: 1417:for the ping. -- 1393: 1368: 1298: 1287: 1233: 1222: 1172: 1161: 1111: 1100: 1048: 1037: 1013:The Dark Crystal 983: 972: 913: 902: 876: 865: 797: 763: 570: 484: 482: 480: 439: 417: 343: 336: 302: 301: 298: 295: 292: 267: 260: 259: 254: 246: 239: 209: 208: 205: 202: 199: 172: 165: 164: 159: 151: 144: 132: 131: 128: 125: 122: 95:WikiProject Film 89: 84: 83: 82: 73: 66: 65: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 23: 16: 2980: 2979: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2920: 2919: 2826:reliable source 2791:reliable source 2769: 2720: 2718:Some new movies 2556: 2513: 2461: 2417: 2387: 2385: 2331: 2184: 2165: 1975:The Grey (film) 1891: 1889:Sources needed? 1850: 1835: 1828: 1765: 1698: 1691: 1635: 1628: 1610: 1534: 1527: 1465: 1458: 1445: 1428: 1391: 1366: 1292: 1285: 1227: 1220: 1166: 1159: 1134: 1105: 1098: 1042: 1035: 1008: 977: 970: 963:Son of Godzilla 922: 907: 900: 886: 870: 863: 841: 839:Werewolf movies 780: 746: 742: 707: 702: 701: 595: 566: 559: 557:Merger proposal 478: 476: 467: 460: 418: 394: 375: 299: 296: 293: 290: 289: 252: 207:horror articles 206: 203: 200: 197: 196: 157: 129: 126: 123: 120: 119: 85: 80: 78: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 2978: 2976: 2968: 2967: 2962: 2957: 2952: 2947: 2942: 2937: 2932: 2922: 2921: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2807:Ok. This one: 2768: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2719: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2618: 2613: 2608: 2603: 2555: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2512: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2460: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2441:discusses here 2416: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2373:Schiaparellist 2335:Tremors (film) 2330: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2183: 2180: 2164: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2115: 2114: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 1987:Natural horror 1948: 1890: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1860:HandsomeMrToad 1849: 1846: 1807:The Lost World 1764: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1709: 1708: 1646: 1645: 1609: 1606: 1595:HandsomeMrToad 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1444: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1422: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1375: 1374: 1352:WP:Source list 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1214:essay about it 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1177: 1176: 1133: 1130: 1119:24.184.132.160 1092: 1091: 1086: 1081: 1068: 1067: 1057:24.184.132.160 1007: 1004: 1003: 1002: 992:24.184.132.160 921: 918: 885: 882: 881: 880: 840: 837: 814: 813: 787:108.209.124.69 753:108.209.124.69 741: 738: 737: 736: 706: 703: 695: 694: 693: 670: 653: 636: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 561: 560: 558: 555: 520:natural horror 486: 485: 459: 456: 393: 390: 374: 371: 368: 367: 362:now serves to 346:Material from 344: 332: 331: 328: 327: 324: 323: 316:Low-importance 312: 306: 305: 303: 268: 256: 255: 253:Low‑importance 247: 235: 234: 231: 230: 223:Low-importance 219: 213: 212: 210: 173: 161: 160: 158:Low‑importance 152: 140: 139: 136: 135: 133: 91: 90: 74: 62: 61: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2977: 2966: 2963: 2961: 2958: 2956: 2953: 2951: 2948: 2946: 2943: 2941: 2938: 2936: 2933: 2931: 2928: 2927: 2925: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2886: 2882: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2854: 2850: 2847: 2844: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2817: 2813: 2810: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2754: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2736:kind regards 2734: 2731: 2729: 2725: 2717: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2653: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2629: 2624: 2623: 2621: 2619: 2616: 2614: 2611: 2609: 2606: 2604: 2601: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2561: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2510: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2442: 2440: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2414: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2393: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2344: 2340: 2339:47.137.185.72 2336: 2328: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2181: 2179: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2162: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2139:that sources 2138: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2009: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1953:survival film 1949: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1856: 1847: 1845: 1844: 1839: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1823: 1822:"unnecesarry" 1817: 1815: 1814: 1809: 1808: 1803: 1799: 1793: 1791: 1787: 1786: 1781: 1780: 1774: 1770: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1745:67.81.107.101 1742: 1741: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1717:67.81.107.101 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1707: 1702: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1686: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1671:67.81.107.101 1668: 1667: 1662: 1661: 1660:King Dinosaur 1656: 1655: 1650: 1644: 1639: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1623: 1619: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1607: 1605: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1591: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1568:67.81.107.101 1565: 1561: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1543: 1538: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1502:67.81.107.101 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1482:67.81.107.101 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1469: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1452: 1451: 1442: 1438: 1433: 1426: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1403: 1398: 1395: 1394: 1388: 1384: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1373: 1370: 1369: 1363: 1358: 1353: 1349: 1348: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1326:67.81.107.101 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1301: 1296: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1253:67.81.107.101 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1236: 1231: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1188:67.81.107.101 1185: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1175: 1170: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1141:67.81.107.101 1138: 1131: 1129: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1115: 1114: 1109: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1090: 1087: 1085: 1082: 1080: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1073: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1046: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1029: 1028: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1014: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 988: 987: 986: 981: 975: 974: 973: 965: 964: 959: 954: 951: 950: 944: 942: 941: 936: 935: 934:Jurassic Park 930: 929: 919: 917: 916: 911: 905: 904: 903: 895: 891: 883: 879: 874: 868: 867: 866: 857: 856: 855: 854: 850: 846: 845:68.196.40.216 838: 836: 834: 830: 826: 822: 812: 808: 804: 800: 799: 798: 796: 792: 788: 784: 776: 775: 772: 769: 764: 762: 758: 754: 750: 739: 735: 731: 727: 723: 722: 721: 720: 716: 712: 704: 699: 692: 688: 685: 682: 678: 674: 671: 669: 665: 661: 657: 654: 652: 648: 644: 640: 637: 635: 631: 627: 623: 622: 621: 620: 616: 612: 611:Morgan Hauser 608: 604: 600: 589: 585: 581: 577: 576: 575: 572: 569: 563: 562: 556: 554: 553: 549: 545: 540: 535: 534: 530: 526: 521: 516: 515: 511: 507: 501: 500: 496: 492: 475: 471: 466: 465: 464: 457: 455: 454: 450: 446: 445:173.18.28.177 441: 438: 434: 430: 426: 422: 414: 411: 410: 405: 403: 398: 391: 389: 388: 384: 380: 372: 365: 361: 357: 353: 350:was split to 349: 345: 342: 338: 337: 321: 317: 311: 308: 307: 304: 300:List articles 287: 283: 279: 275: 274: 269: 266: 262: 261: 257: 251: 248: 245: 241: 228: 224: 218: 215: 214: 211: 194: 193: 188: 184: 180: 179: 174: 171: 167: 166: 162: 156: 153: 150: 146: 134: 130:film articles 117: 113: 112:documentation 109: 105: 101: 97: 96: 88: 77: 75: 72: 68: 67: 63: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 18: 17: 2770: 2735: 2732: 2721: 2644:WP:LISTCRUFT 2642:Sounds like 2557: 2536:Annihilation 2535: 2514: 2488: 2462: 2438: 2418: 2391: 2332: 2238: 2234: 2188:The Asylum's 2185: 2166: 2140: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2061: 2005: 1929: 1925: 1918:KaijuFan4000 1892: 1858:be listed? 1853: 1851: 1826: 1825: 1818: 1811: 1810:, nor would 1805: 1801: 1797: 1794: 1789: 1783: 1777: 1766: 1738: 1689: 1688: 1684: 1664: 1658: 1652: 1648: 1647: 1626: 1625: 1617: 1611: 1588: 1586: 1563: 1559: 1525: 1524: 1456: 1455: 1448: 1446: 1419:MorbidEntree 1390: 1383:MorbidEntree 1365: 1356: 1283: 1282: 1218: 1217: 1157: 1156: 1135: 1116: 1096: 1095: 1093: 1069: 1033: 1032: 1027:Harry Potter 1025: 1011: 1009: 968: 967: 961: 955: 947: 945: 938: 932: 926: 923: 898: 897: 887: 861: 860: 842: 819:— Preceding 815: 781:— Preceding 777: 765: 747:— Preceding 743: 708: 697: 683: 672: 655: 638: 626:Andrzejbanas 596: 573: 567: 564: 536: 519: 517: 502: 487: 477:. Retrieved 473: 461: 442: 415: 412: 406: 399: 395: 379:73.235.91.43 376: 315: 282:project page 271: 222: 190: 176: 93: 40:WikiProjects 2879:What then? 2753:Betty Logan 2696:98.13.3.175 2662:98.13.3.175 2648:Betty Logan 2628:98.13.3.175 2565:98.13.3.175 2540:Betty Logan 2497:Betty Logan 2445:Betty Logan 2422:Kumagoro-42 2397:Betty Logan 2358:Betty Logan 2289:Betty Logan 2244:Betty Logan 2104:Betty Logan 1991:Betty Logan 1769:"fuck face" 1740:Cloverfield 1415:Tokyogirl79 1387:Tokyogirl79 1362:Tokyogirl79 958:horror film 419:—Preceding 87:Film portal 2924:Categories 2863:WP:RS/IMDb 1989:category. 1813:Piranha 3D 890:WP:MOSLINK 643:Wetdogmeat 286:discussion 187:literature 116:guidelines 104:open tasks 30:List-class 2881:Hj1924601 2849:Hj1924601 2812:Hj1924601 2776:Hj1924601 2303:WisDom-UK 2272:WisDom-UK 2239:unsourced 2221:WisDom-UK 2095:The Thing 2079:WP:BURDEN 1914:WP:BURDEN 1590:King Kong 711:Zell Faze 677:Cas Liber 660:Zell Faze 479:28 August 463:afraid." 2532:Allmovie 2489:Godzilla 2415:Godzilla 2354:Allmovie 2285:Allmovie 2169:Bkatcher 2137:WP:LISTV 2123:TurokSwe 2064:TurokSwe 1895:WP:LISTV 1875:Bkatcher 1432:{{ping}} 894:edit war 821:unsigned 803:Mirokado 783:unsigned 749:unsigned 687:contribs 544:Mirokado 525:Mirokado 506:Mirokado 491:Mirokado 433:contribs 421:unsigned 392:Untitled 2895:DonIago 2867:DonIago 2830:DonIago 2795:DonIago 2767:The Red 2681:DonIago 2588:DonIago 2439:Vulture 2329:Tremors 2258:DonIago 2235:sourced 2233:Adding 2207:DonIago 2192:Iapetus 2145:DonIago 2091:The Fly 2047:DonIago 2036:contrib 2013:DonIago 1965:contrib 1942:contrib 1899:DonIago 1829:Matthew 1816:, etc. 1790:Dracula 1785:Dracula 1692:Matthew 1685:Comment 1649:Support 1629:Matthew 1528:Matthew 1459:Matthew 1392:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1367:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1286:Matthew 1221:Matthew 1160:Matthew 1099:Matthew 1072:cryptid 1036:Matthew 1018:Skeksis 971:Matthew 901:Matthew 864:Matthew 656:Support 639:Support 360:history 318:on the 225:on the 2861:Nope. 1930:having 1922:WP:LSC 1916:is on 1773:WP:NPA 1618:Oppose 1411:Weebly 1409:and a 766:edit: 673:Oppose 605:, and 198:Horror 155:Horror 36:scale. 2677:draft 1560:Frogs 1450:Frogs 291:Lists 250:Lists 2899:talk 2885:talk 2871:talk 2853:talk 2834:talk 2816:talk 2799:talk 2780:talk 2757:talk 2742:talk 2700:talk 2694:one. 2685:talk 2666:talk 2652:talk 2632:talk 2592:talk 2584:Jaws 2569:talk 2544:talk 2521:talk 2501:talk 2470:talk 2449:talk 2426:talk 2401:talk 2392:Done 2377:talk 2362:talk 2343:talk 2307:talk 2293:talk 2276:talk 2262:talk 2248:talk 2225:talk 2211:talk 2196:talk 2173:talk 2149:talk 2127:talk 2108:talk 2093:and 2068:talk 2051:talk 2032:talk 2028:Erik 2017:talk 1995:talk 1981:and 1961:talk 1957:Erik 1938:talk 1934:Erik 1903:talk 1879:talk 1864:talk 1838:talk 1802:Jaws 1798:Jaws 1779:Jaws 1749:talk 1721:talk 1701:talk 1675:talk 1657:and 1638:talk 1599:talk 1572:talk 1562:and 1537:talk 1506:talk 1486:talk 1468:talk 1407:IMDb 1357:what 1330:talk 1295:talk 1257:talk 1230:talk 1210:IMDb 1192:talk 1169:talk 1145:talk 1123:talk 1108:talk 1061:talk 1045:talk 1024:and 996:talk 980:talk 949:Jaws 910:talk 873:talk 849:talk 829:talk 807:talk 791:talk 757:talk 730:talk 715:talk 681:talk 664:talk 647:talk 630:talk 615:talk 584:talk 548:talk 529:talk 510:talk 495:talk 481:2011 449:talk 429:talk 383:talk 183:film 121:Film 106:and 59:Film 2141:are 2038:) 1967:) 1944:) 474:CNN 354:on 310:Low 217:Low 2926:: 2901:) 2887:) 2873:) 2865:. 2855:) 2836:) 2828:. 2818:) 2801:) 2782:) 2759:) 2744:) 2730:. 2702:) 2687:) 2668:) 2654:) 2634:) 2594:) 2571:) 2546:) 2523:) 2503:) 2495:. 2472:) 2451:) 2443:. 2428:) 2403:) 2379:) 2364:) 2345:) 2309:) 2295:) 2278:) 2264:) 2250:) 2227:) 2213:) 2198:) 2175:) 2151:) 2129:) 2110:) 2070:) 2053:) 2034:| 2019:) 1997:) 1963:| 1940:| 1924:, 1905:) 1881:) 1866:) 1834:- 1751:) 1723:) 1697:- 1677:) 1634:- 1601:) 1574:) 1533:- 1508:) 1488:) 1464:- 1421:- 1332:) 1291:- 1259:) 1226:- 1194:) 1186:-- 1165:- 1147:) 1139:-- 1125:) 1104:- 1074:. 1063:) 1041:- 998:) 976:- 906:- 869:- 851:) 831:) 809:) 793:) 759:) 732:) 717:) 689:) 666:) 649:) 632:) 617:) 601:, 586:) 550:) 531:) 512:) 497:) 489:-- 472:. 451:) 435:) 431:• 385:) 185:, 2897:( 2883:( 2869:( 2851:( 2832:( 2814:( 2797:( 2778:( 2755:( 2740:( 2698:( 2683:( 2664:( 2650:( 2630:( 2590:( 2567:( 2542:( 2519:( 2499:( 2468:( 2447:( 2424:( 2399:( 2375:( 2360:( 2341:( 2305:( 2291:( 2274:( 2260:( 2246:( 2223:( 2209:( 2194:( 2171:( 2147:( 2125:( 2106:( 2066:( 2049:( 2030:( 2015:( 1993:( 1959:( 1936:( 1901:( 1877:( 1862:( 1840:) 1836:( 1747:( 1719:( 1703:) 1699:( 1673:( 1640:) 1636:( 1597:( 1570:( 1539:) 1535:( 1523:– 1504:( 1484:( 1470:) 1466:( 1434:) 1427:) 1423:( 1328:( 1297:) 1293:( 1255:( 1232:) 1228:( 1190:( 1171:) 1167:( 1155:– 1143:( 1121:( 1110:) 1106:( 1094:– 1059:( 1047:) 1043:( 1031:– 994:( 982:) 978:( 912:) 908:( 875:) 871:( 859:– 847:( 827:( 805:( 789:( 755:( 728:( 713:( 684:· 679:( 662:( 645:( 628:( 613:( 582:( 546:( 527:( 508:( 493:( 483:. 447:( 427:( 381:( 322:. 288:. 229:. 118:. 42::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index