33:
I added the tags to the page. I felt the article was in need of some experts' knowledge. Plus, One can not start a
Knowledge article and write "Feel free to add what you feel necessary."! and also there are some Physics, Quantum mechanics, and Chemistry theories under Psychology!! , the idea of the
16:
Hello, i am the creator of this page, because I noticed that wikipedia was lacking a compilation of relevant (and significant) theories/laws, and I felt it necessary to get one started. Make sure that you links are actually linking to
99:
I'm starting to agree. Generally speaking, a law, a theory, and a theorem are very different things. I also don't see any reason to use a list rather than a category. All of science is theory, really.
34:
article is good and needed. but attention must be paid to what it contains or the message it sends to the reader. but good work nonetheless
Bearsbaseballcubs !
70:
22:
18:
62:
81:. Why do we need another one ? Seems to me that this new list will only duplicate what already exists.
108:
90:
50:
26:
86:
104:
78:
58:
74:
82:
100:
66:
45:
40:
35:
57:Knowledge already has many similar lists - see
8:
71:List of scientific laws named after people
7:
14:
1:
109:18:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
91:15:26, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
51:19:42, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
27:05:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
127:
63:List of discoveries
118:
79:List of theorems
59:List of theories
48:
43:
38:
126:
125:
121:
120:
119:
117:
116:
115:
75:Laws of science
46:
41:
36:
12:
11:
5:
124:
122:
114:
113:
112:
111:
94:
93:
54:
53:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
123:
110:
106:
102:
98:
97:
96:
95:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
60:
56:
55:
52:
49:
44:
39:
32:
31:
30:
28:
24:
20:
67:List of laws
15:
17:something.(
83:Gandalf61
101:eaolson
19:scosco
105:talk
87:talk
37:Λua∫
23:talk
107:)
89:)
77:,
73:,
69:,
65:,
61:,
47:se
42:Wi
29:)
25:)
103:(
85:(
21:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.