1521:
your precious "sober" sources pointedly don't; because it exposes the truth about their incestuous relationships at all levels; you have built a wall against sources that don't jibe with your position, why should I spend my evening and the next day or two satisfying someone who has already made it very clear he won't accept what he doesn't want to hear? I'm not your pet monkey,and I'm tired of the "get me a shrubbery" tactic. I repeat what I've already said, which you haven't acknowledged or taken action on; either add what you want to expand the article or stop arguing about the title and denying that obvious realities of the
Canadian political-media-government triad exists; I see you're from the UK, though live in Canada now.....if you genuinely have never heard of what I'm talking about, you don't read much outside your "sober" sources and their cadre of "write what we want or get fired" team of dissemblers; scores of writers have left their employ or been fired for not toeing the line; it was even gloated by a conservative columnist that there are no more 'liberal' columnists west of the Great Lakes; indeed not, most write their own sites now or work for independent papers...the very ones you maintain are "ideologically driven", which is code for "not conservative".
1544:
properly, don't just keep making poor and ill thought out excuses. All of the prejudice and POV has been coming from you, and you very clearly have an agenda in maintaining the image of this event as some cataclysmic, world-news-coverage-worthy event. Yet as with so many occurrences of the same, you level those charges against your opponents with no proof whatsoever. You accuse any source that doesn't use the term "disaster" as doing so for agenda-setting and POV reasons, yet you seem to think that use of that term is entirely reasonable and not at all POV whatsoever, oh no. Yes, I have been living in Canada for around the last decade only, does that mean I can't comment on what is and isn't a reliable media source? Again and again and again and again and again and again you level spurious and entirely unsupported accusations against mainstream media, but you seem to think that you are exempt from justifying your opinion with actual facts. Again, if these "corporate-political" links are actually a matter of fact then you should be able to point me to reputable sources that have documented them. It is not up to me to make your arguments and provide proof for you, that is your role in this debate.
2656:
template to a phrase which appears in many sources, other than the three I did provide as references, without even attempting to search that phrase; which is clearly opprobrium to all other participants in this own section, whose views and POV too closely coincide with that of the government/corporate-side p.r.. Balance is what this article needs, in all its material, not one-sided reliance on government statements and a certain pro-government columnist, while downplaying as above the WTI citations as "out of date" when really they're only nine days old; that the paper Sage
Birchwater works for has since stopped using "disaster" is apt demonstration of the centralized control of the flow of information by the government-friendly/allied news monopolies. As yet Grand Chief STewart Philip's comments and others like his have not yet been added to the article and that's my bad for not ignoring the troll...though doubtless we'd have seen some edit was and cries of "biased sources" from the same element.
2992:
did not contain that statement. On August 10 I added the note “citation needed” to this unreferenced statement. As of August 16 no-one had added any reference so I deleted the statement as unreferenced. Skookum1 then reinserted the statement and referenced three articles that included the statement - all three of which are dated August 12 and later, so none of these references were available at the time the statement was first inserted, nor when I added my “citation needed”. I don't think it is the job of other editors to find attributions to unreferenced statements in articles - and certainly not to keep checking over time to see if a source eventually emerges. (I posted this earlier today, then took it down because I thought I wouldn't drag this debate out, but this evening I realized that
Skookum1 had posted on other parts of Knowledge (XXG) the accusation that I acted improperly, so I want to provide the logic I saw in my actions)
1475:
those very sources? Sorry, not gonna play that game; the financial ties between the newspaper/media chains and the ruling parties are well-known in
Canadian politics, as is the role the mining industry has had in putting the BC Liberals in power and getting legislation it wanted fulfilled. If you're not aware of all this, it's either because you don't know anything about Canadian political realities, or are are here to dissemble and nothing more...all the while spouting troll-talk that's recognizable from the news forums in all media, including the mainstream media's forums. Quibbling about the article's title while doing nothing to improve and expand it, and demanding I prove what many Canadians already know and Canadian journalism schools and communications analysts have been saying for years. You're asking me to prove the obvious, while continuing to denounce sources you don't like as "ideologically driven" as if the
1386:
400k uses of alternate terms, including one term (mine spill) that outnumbers "disaster" by more than two two one. You then tried to engage in some intellectually bankrupt manipulation by claiming entirely unsubstantiated duplication between sources that you claim are mere mirrors of one another. Even here you don't appear to be aware of even basic facts, such as CTV and The
Province being independent sources that are not actually linked in any way (one being owned by Shaw Communications, the other by Postmedia). Again and again I have asked you for evidence to support your claims, but all you can provide are personal attacks and abuse. That isn't the behaviour of a reputable editor, that is the behaviour of a troll. Put up or shut up: provide sources that substantiate your claims of both "corporate-political" links and inherent bias in mainstream media sources.
1153:
water and fish safety, for example. Both sets of tests showed that water was safe to drink and fish were safe to eat; a good news story in most people's books, surely? Yet VanObs chose to open their headline "Residents scoff as..." That isn't, balanced, nuanced, objective reporting, that is yellow press sensationalism of the worst kind. In the last couple of days they have been so desperate to keep the scare-mongering alive that they have even taken to giving over a large chunk of a story to quotations from the security guard standing next to the water tanker in Likely, as though he were some sort of reliable authority. Bizarre. Other than
Imperial Metals and Global both being TSX-listed, please do also provide some evidence for your claimed "corporate-political" links between the two.
1229:, as also with the parroting of hte BC government's position that this is "not an environmental disaster". I have provided examples of other wiki-articles with "disaster" in them, pointed out that it has been described as such by man people affected, including First Nations governments, and you say I have not substantiated them, even though I have....you are being countefactual and apparently will not read or acknowledge, 94,000+ sources and are talking through your hat in claiming I have no substantiated them; whereas you are refusing to read them, it seems, by your POV claim that they are "poor journalism" and "rabble rousers". Your POV is on clear display, as is your resistance to acknowledge valid sources, including those of FN governments and organizations.
1649:. I've wasted enough time on your garbage-y accusations and cant; go find another article to argue about its title; the sources below (and there are more out there) demonstrate that there IS an answer to "Who's calling it a "disaster"? I would think and inflammatory title like this would need to be well sourced?" and yours and Sweet Nightmare's claims that the title is POV: then so are the Williams Lake Tribune, local MLAs, local mayors and resort owners, the provincial Privacy Commissioner and Grand Chief of the UBCIC, and an Alaskan senator.....even the BC Mines minister says it "may...be a disaster", after first denying it was (just like you, Sweet Nightmares, and the now-departed p.r. hack IP user.
962:
coverage of the corporate media vs independent media, especially not using derogatory descriptions to discredit the latter, as you have just done. The claim in "who's calling it a "disaster"? I would think and inflammatory title like this would need to be well sourced?" is disingenuous, for anyone following this matter. Who's calling it a disaster?" The Union of BC Indian Chiefs for one, and the
Esketemc First Nation, for another, and the St'at'imc Chiefs Council. Four of the links above use "disaster" so that makes the IP user's "who's calling it a disaster completely disingenous; oh, the CBC article, as I recall, described it as the largest such
2873:
history articles this month, but .... well, nobody else was finding cites here, while claiming sources didn't exist to support the title; I think, as you will I hope agree, I have more than adequately proven that 'that term" is in fact in wide use in media, by public officials, and more.....and is not "POV" but adequate to describe more than just the details of the spill itself. No one has yet called it a "scandal" other than a handful; but that again, if that were to arise, is actually a different title/article....material that is widely discussed right now as to campaign donations and such, well, that maybe could go on
213:
383:
362:
147:
2574:
unimportant to you, then why are you complaining so much? I will work on the article when I am confident that I am not going to be enmeshed in tedious and time-consuming battles with editors who only want to represent one side of a topic. For starters, it would have been good to eradicate any mention of the entirely fictional "Imperial Mines" entity, which despite your crusade for factuality were still there until IP editor 216.232.227.60 removed them.
393:
1458:(but you won't read or acknowledge as valid), we're stuck at an impasse; you refuse to admit those as valid sources, I maintain that the monopolistic nature of Canadian media is well-known and is subject of widespread discussion in Canada, including in academia...so you're engaging in "get me a shrubbery" to eat up time and energy and keep this "discussion" going with POV putdowns of criticism of the government/corporate sphere and
2460:"My office has been closely monitoring recent events involving the Mount Polley mine tailings-pond breach, which has significantly impacted the people and lands of B.C.'s Cariboo region. In the aftermath of the breach, concerns are being raised about what government knew about the condition of the Mount Polley mine and whether the public should have been notified of potential risks before the disaster occurred," Denham said.
282:
261:
2536:
interviews that they have conducted with third parties. Notice how rarely they use verbatim quotations. This is the mark of a good journalist. Keep you own opinions to yourself, but don't put words into the mouths of others. If your interviewee uses "disaster" then you use "disaster" when you report their opinions. However, don't use a qualitative and subjective term in the simple commentary on events.
137:
233:
106:
2672:
else to find the references - I understand that it is the responsibility of someone adding material to to also reference it. Also I don't believe it is appropriate for one editor to assume what work another editor has done or has not done to find references for material someone else added - it is neither POV nor an indication of lack of effort for an editor to remove unreferenced material.
32:
75:
1315:
issues 3) he's just going to overwhelm anyone who disagrees with post after post after post of conspiracy claims and undocumented/unproven corruption of anyone or any source he doesn't agree with. I read wiki a lot and contribute once in a blue moon. Thought I could lend something to this article but I don't have the time or energy for this kind of bullying. Peace out.
696:
2704:
statements about more balanced articles on your own userpage, which I read with interest, is rather....odd. I was accused by those above of being POV and a troll, while their own POV was on blatant display. Now, it happens that you are a mining consultant, and have taken an interest in mining articles and..... you should really read
2867:. When I get accused of things by people pointing fingers who are not...being nice...I get my back up, and yes, my fangs come out. But given the situation of your professional career re this industry....I'm really not the one with the bigger problem here, as far as formal procedures and policies go...16:36, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
1039:
a million dollars in tax-deductible funds raised in
Alberta last year to further a "flow-through tax credit" which was passed six months later by the beneficiaries...; the incestuousness of the mainstream media evident in their avoidance of the term "disaster" is duly noted. 'Twas me, by the way, who alerted
2962:
covers the promotion of an editor's business, financial or other interests, which includes paid or unpaid advocacy. If your work in the mining industry is not directly or indirectly related to the cited article topics (for example they're your competitors or you are an employee/consultant/analyst for
2872:
I trust I will see some 'responsible editing' on your part when I wake up, and perhaps some more editors from WP:Environment and WP:Canada also taking part. I don't want to spend my next month on this article or in any ANI as recipient or nominator of that "honour"....I had had plans of writing some
2790:
I simply asked for others to help expand the article; and got dragged into a nasty bit of business above from somebody who was only here to bitch about the word "disaster" and another who slagged non-MSM media as "rabble rousers" and "porr journalism" and other POV comments. And it was me who tagged
2775:
and related materials, and make a full disclosure as is now expected of business professionals editing
Knowledge (XXG), and refrain from making more-than-technical edits on articles about companies or associations you may have or have had contracts with...and please bear in mind seeking procedures to
2732:
and more......Now, I don't know if it was you who added the cite from the BC Government
Newsroom without naming the publisher, but given that that was left out was a "sin by omisssion" by whomever did. There are plenty of other sources out there than them, which do not have a POV agenda as they very
1644:
claim that "sober" "reliable sources" do not use the term "disaster". If you're not going to expand the article and are only here to demand food for your red herring, go find yourself another fishbucket. Case closed; your demands I prove the obvious about Canadian media and ties between governments
1585:
see you showing any effort at doing anything but a POV campaign against the current title, repeating recognizable anti-independent media troll-talk..and attacking me and demanding I sit up and do tricks, which you'll just s**t on anyway. You're the pathetic one, buddy, I've seen your kind before and
1450:
of bullying, when his cant and "line" is an aping of the BC government's position, now under fire from independent media and also the CBC; you want to argue about whether it's a disaster or not and style me as a "troll" and POV and the sources you don't like as "ideologically driven" "rabble rousers"
1038:
I didn't filter for facebook or twitter or the like, and I note that yahoonews and huffington post copy is Canadian Press or otherwise derived/adapted from CTV/CBC coverage; Canadian Press' office in BC is closely tied to the Sun and Province and (via marriage) to the BC Liberal Party, which received
694:
Hazeltine Creek enters Quesnel Lake at Hazeltine Flat; I suspect the locality is known locally as Hazeltine,and given the flat, someone may have homesteaded there or live there still, though no locality is listed on BC Names; there is a Hazeltine Flat on Antler Creek farther northwest, probably named
2924:
have professional consulting association(s) you do have and as to approprate procedures on any such pages related to your professional activities in Knowledge (XXG); normally that would be making requests on article talkpages for someone else to make an edit for you, other than punctuation, spelling
2770:
which I note you have also edited on substantially, while you were complaining about me here. It's late in my timezone and I've spent enough time on this matter today; more than enough.....I can be very polite if not attacked and insulted as I was above. You are a professional, I hope that you will
2751:
and other articles. I am more than willing to collaborate with you on this article, within my own time constraints (I do have other things going on in my life and within Knowledge (XXG)), but seeing you delete an easily citable passage with apparent too-much-simlarity to those disproven above, also
2703:
Well, noting that you took out a phrase that was easily citable and jibed with the agenda of those above who ranted about "disaster" being POV and not found in mainstream sources, and noting how many of those I found, including the two I just added in replacing that phrase that you had removed, your
1385:
No, we are interested in making sure that the article's title properly reflects the situation and, most importantly, the common terms being used to discuss this event. As your own research has shown, use of the term "disaster" is very much a minority position with only 94k uses compared to more than
1314:
I just read the entire discussion here and it appears that: 1) Skook believes his opinion of the MSM is supreme and therefore they must all be flatly dismissed (does he have any proof of these "corporate ties" of is this just his opinion/speculation?) 2) he has strong POV on environmental and native
2991:
Something for others to consider - when this article was first created on August 7 the statement was included “The spill has been called one of the largest Canadian environmental disaster in modern history“. The only reference to the article at that time was a CBC article that as far as I can tell
2785:
Y'see, you are at least working on the article, unlike those whining about "disaster" being used in the title. There are ways to adjust the title, formal procedures that take a fair bit of time and are not constructive in terms of expanding the article...in the interests of NPOV, while I am asleep
2671:
One of the values of Knowledge (XXG) is that multiple editors help lead to a balanced article - part of that process should be respect for other editors. Someone please enlighten me if I am wrong, but I don't believe that includes that one person can put in unreferenced material and expect someone
2651:
I've fixed my indenting to the one-colon level and added the three-tilde undated signature to posts of mine that had been broken into paragraphs; also unindented follow-up posts below just-earlier posts of mine so that all my posts are at the same colon-level and all paragraphs are now identifiable
2602:
In all good faith, I posted this on CANTALK hoping that others would take my lead about the scope of coverage and the many issues and background arising from it, and work on expanding it with needed content. Instead a name dispute has been launched, and a huge group of sources treated in a derisive
1769:
A Disaster Psycho-Social Support (DPS) team has deployed locally to offer residents emotional support for their unique impacts and needs. Emergency Management BC (EMBC) requested DPS services from the Provincial Health Services Authority, which co-ordinates trained volunteers to provide services to
1470:
preferred sources/information into the article? What kind of opposition are you going to undertake when I - or anyone - start adding things the UBCIC, the first nations whose territory it is or whose fishery is being affected (despite denials from the government that there's anything wrong).....or
1269:
I had just thought that since virtually all the local, regional and national media outlets including The Tyee and The Straight were calling it either a "spill" or "breach" that it would be titled as such here. Those sources calling it a "disaster" appear to be ideologically slanted alternative news
980:
widely used by the media, and by those affected by this; the first two terms, also, could confine this only to technical details of the spill itself, vs the wider disaster to the fishery and fauna and local economy and society that only "disaster" can adequately describe. The invective against the
2943:
I would appreciate guidance from others - I do not understand that COI requires editors to disclose their membership in industry organizations (I presume that would extend to disclosing membership or involvement in other interest groups ?). I don't see involvement in the industry as a "conflict",
2889:. There's a lot to be done in Knowledge (XXG) because of these events; making procedural vendettas is a bore and a waste of time as far as constructive work to expand/improve articles goes, no? Good night, sir, I look forward to seeing your contributions tomorrow (it's quarter to midnight here).
2535:
The Vancouver Sun is a very interesting source and I'm glad you thought to look through. However, I'm afraid that it doesn't support your opinion. In pretty much every case you cite their own commentary uses only "spill", "breach" or similar, and they only use "disaster" when they are paraphrasing
1675:
Lovely, yet more flannel and misrepresentation without actually addressing the question I put to you. Where are the "corporate-political" sources? You were using that argument to dismiss one set of sources, which is most certainly an editorial issue, yet you provide no proof. Faced with a complete
2919:
Good. In the interest of what is laid out at WP:COI, you should make a full disclosure of any such economic associations and any mining industry associations you may belong to on your user page, and consult with the talkpage at COI and the policies and pages listed there as to what to do for any
2746:
If you are really interested in a fair and balanced article, then you should incorporate material from the many citations I have provided above, which contain considerably more balanced information than the very and obviously/implicitly POV material from the BC government which now dominates this
1520:
No, "buddy" I've had a day doing stuff; dammit; going to the store,dealing with a dead phone, a dead friend (really), a virus, my work, and am not about to spend my evening pandering to demands from a POV troll who has already denounced the type of sources that would carry that information, which
1206:
My assessment is "not valid"? I gave you specific examples of poor journalism, you give me abuse. That does rather undermine your own credibility, not mine. And if there are "LOTS" of sources out there for the information you, again, fail to substantiate then why are you having so much difficulty
1895:
So, as far as "who's calling it a disaster" goes, clearly not the Williams Lake Tribune. They called it that initially, but since more knowledge and test results have been provided they don't seem to think it is any more. And states of emergency are called for... emergencies! (The clue is in the
1576:
of the reality of Canadian media and corporate-ruling party ties because of the POV already pushed here by the IP user's launching of the name dispute, and the rank POV or your "rabble rousers" bitch about media you don't like; in the meantime no work at all has been done on the article....which
1474:
And btw, I live in another timezone far from yours, and have a whole bunch of personal matters going on not worth relaying t o someone as callous as you obviously are; it's not like I'm going to jump up and run to the sources to fulfill the demands of someone who's made it clear he is hostile to
1152:
Skookum, please do try to assume good faith. Also, don't confuse independent with reliable, the two are not at all the same thing. My assessment of VanObs' relibility is based entirely on their behaviour in covering this event. Take their recent story covering the announcement of test results on
930:
To me your "sober" sites are corporate-oriented and with close ties to the mining industry and therefore POV, and CTV and the Province have corporate-political ties to Imperial Metals, so does the BC Liberal Party; CBC is politically neutered of late and apes the Global-style of coverage; Global
2655:
My main concern is that throughout out the persistent madness above, I have constantly gone and provided sources as examples, and all of those sources contain material that could expand the article, which at least DigitalDavidG did a bit of expansion on; though deleted a hostile citation-needed
911:
Agreed SN. Most sober sources (e.g. CBC, CTV, The Province, etc.) are going with neutral terms such as "spill" or "breach". Only the rabble rousers like Vancouver Observer are still using "disaster". As the true physical and social impacts of this event apparently diminish by the day, Knowledge
2296:
Again with the POV accusation, like you are some unimpeachable arbiter of neutrality! That's hilarious. As pointed out above, only one of those uses is not simple reportage of a third party's words and opinions, or has not been superseded by changing events. Since last week the CBC have almost
2573:
It's not picky at all. If the facts change in 20 minutes then the circumstances change, never mind a span as long as 9 days. The title is the banner beneath which the whole article is constructed, so actually it is the most important part. If you are saying that having a non-neutral title is
1543:
Ha! So anyone who disagrees with you is simply dismissed as a "POV troll"? This despite the fact that it is me who has been providing proof of my statements and you who is hiding behind abuse and hearsay? Frankly I don't care how busy your day has been, if you engage in debate here then do it
1329:
And you are the one calling them "ideologically-slanted news sources" as if CTV and the Sun weren't. You weren't interested in improving or expanding the article, only quibbling about the title to match the government's line that it is not a disaster; That's POV and highly suspect; you don't
1171:
Your assessment of those sources is not valid and is obviously POV per your use of "rabble rousers", which is a parroting of corporate/BC Liberal putdowns of sources critical of them. As for corporate-political links, why don't you read some of the coverage, there's lots of material on that.
961:
or CTV; calling them "rabble rousers" because they don't toe the corporate line, using terms recognizable as part of corporate p.r. put-downs of them, is...well, never mind, it's clear we don't see eye-to-eye this. But "balance" doesn't mean putting UNDUE weight on the allegedly more "sober"
1952:
I know the right-wing-partisan lobby in Canada, spearheaded by SunMedia but including the regular troll-pack in major news forums, want the CBC privatized so it does as its told, and consider it a hotbed of left-wingers, but here are articles from the CBC website, which is noted for "sober"
1930:, your claim of "out of date" is specious and nosensical and is further evidence of your POV agenda here, which is to obliterate the word "disaster" from the public record. Take it to the Privacy Commissioner, go harass the MLA, and local residents, and tell them it's not a a disaster.....
1334:
for covering environmental issues and native issues, and this is definitely a native issue; suggesting that my desire to see that material fairly represented and not whitewashed or ignored or branded as "ideologically-motivated" is only so much more POV from your side, and also part of the
936:
partisan-speak. I reject the notion that the Observer, The Tyee and the Straight are not reliable sources; time and again they have proven more reliable than the mainstream media and its pushing of neutered language, as with "oil sands" vs "tar sands", and its ties to the corporate world.
1032:
935:
and non-corporate Vancouver Observer as "rabble rouser" is p.r. troll-talk and is also not acceptable if what I have just said isn't, as is your also-POV wording "more sober sources". I've been "bit" by IP users a-plenty in my time, all with an obvious agenda pushing corporate-speak or
975:
I'll run a comparative search on the three terms "breach", "spill" and "disaster", and we'll see what comes up; but I'll be discounting repetitions of CTV and Province coverage in other outlets of the same media chain(s)....I saw nothing wrong with the title in POV terms because it
2633:— but then there are two unsigned posts in a row, so maybe not?) please fix their signatures below, or else convince me that it's worth taking a tour through the history to learn who wrote what? Note also that four tildes give a proper sig, while five tildes just give a timestamp.
2332:
to prove what my opponents above have been vociferously denying and attacking me for, has lots of usages, including from local politicians and senior bureacurats (the provincial Privacy Commissioner), and both a denial and an admission of possibility from the Minister of Mines,
2502:
Jay Ritchlin, the western region director general for the David Suzuki Foundation, said while there’s little doubt the dam collapse was “bad” and that it will require longer-term monitoring to determine its effects, he saw little use in arguing whether it was an environmental
2520:, including in headlines. The term was used by an Alaska senator, also. CTV had lots of instances of "disaster", but none about this event/ series of events; as per my observation above, they are "ideologically driven", perhaps the better wording is "politically connected".
1709:
Per the above, very annoying troll-hype against the term disaster and supposed "rabble rouser" and "ideologically driven" sources and claims of "poor journalism", an easy-to-find and very obvious close-to-the-ground media source has these headlines and articles from the
1010:
715:
1022:
2603:
manner by at least one editor supporting the IP user's complaint, which is POV and recognizably so, as is that supporting editor's usages; yes, what I said back is POV too, but it's because balance is needed, not one-sided wiki-derogation. To me, this article needs
1016:
1571:
have a political agenda; silencing what you don't like, and denouncing anyone saying it, including me. I'd posted a notice at CANTALK about expanding the article, I didn't make any suggestions that it should be slanted one way or the other; I'e only laid out my
1004:
1636:, which is hereby showing that your position, and that of the now-departed POV troll, and your own POV trolling and accusations and denunciations against me, are useless diversions from the issues at hand; which is expanding the article, and settling the
752:
I just took the time to create it using BC Names and bivouac.com (I was the one, in fact, who charted this for bivouac.com during my time as senior geographer there, in calculating the province-wide network of prominence relationships. I left redlinked
2747:
article. I have no POV agenda, and no COI whatsoever, and other than being a citizen (though living far abroad at present), am a long-time Wikipedian who has taken on POV issues on both sides of the enviro propaganda-war, such as trimming POV dross on
2374:
She added that a lot of work needs to be done to clean up the mine disaster, and the province is focused on that. But it is also working to get up-to-date imagery that puts the scope of the incident in perspective and encourage visitors to come to the
2432:
privacy commissioner Elizabeth Denham said concerns are being raised about what the provincial government knew about the condition of the Mount Polley mine and whether the public should have been notified of the potential risks before the disaster
2029:
Privacy commissioner Elizabeth Denham says concerns are being raised about what the provincial government knew about the condition of the Mount Polley mine and whether the public should have been notified of the potential risks before the disaster
2558:
have used it, it's found in headlines and ledes, it's used by the FN bands, and more. Go stuff it. Are you actually going to work on the article or just keep on fighting over the title on a totally POV agenda? Never mind, I already know the
1062:
in its day, independent journalists in BC who will not work for or are not welcome at CanWest or Global or whatever it's called now are generally held in higher regard by educated readers...not, of course, by those who dismiss them as "rabble
1856:
during World War II So "Who's calling it a disaster", the main local newspaper, the local MLA, and Emergency Services BC calling in a Disaster Psycho-Social Support team, that's who. States of Emergency and DPS teams are not called in for
1028:
3062:
2297:
entirely used "spill" or "breach". Picking and choosing your evidence and not providing a broad overview of a source and how that source has evolved in time is pretty shoddy debating, but that seems par for the course with you.
2381:
Len Doucette, general manager at the Hills Health Ranch at 108 Mile in the south of the Cariboo-Chilcotin region, added that the scope of the disaster was initially exaggerated, with terms like “B.C.’s Exxon Valdez” applied to
2091:"I think the Mount Polley disaster will have a profound impact on the mining industry throughout the entire province," said Phillip, who said the province, the federal government and the mining industry all share in the blame.
2733:
implicitly do. Your userpage talks about ensuring balanced coverage of mining articles.....I hope that doesn't mean not including things you just don't like and favouring government and mining industry statements and POV.(
1797:
Imperial Metals Corporations issued a statement about the disaster Tuesday, stating the tailings dam breach had stabilized and that they are working closely with provincial ministries, local agencies and emergency response
1601:
Facts. Show facts. The voices in your head and the prejudice in your heart are not facts. Making scurrilous and unsupported attacks against me and my motivations for engaging in this debate are a coward's debating tactic.
737:
It's the spill that's made it notable, not the mine, though there are as yet tons of mine and geological information from mining cites that need creating. BCMINFILE if you search with that in the search terms will have
718:. We have several sources on its geology and probably other info buried within. I'd say it's worthy. It could contain a section each perhaps on the company operating the mine there, as well as a summary of the spill. -
1441:
and more. That's "blanketing results". I'm not behaving like a troll, that was the IP user who, confronted with answers to his question "who's calling it a disaster" and confronted with a sample of 94,000+ hits that
2765:
I was in fact contemplating how to address your apparent COI adn so-far-associated-POV activity here without taking this to the formal procedures of the various ANI boards that apply...and have just added material to
1466:. I've seen this kind of thing before; too much. That you incant the usual denunciations of the independent media as "rabble rousers" and more indicates you do NOT have NPOV in mind. What work have you done to add
3057:
1058:'s publications, which are an effective monoolistic control on local newspapers in BC, is as valid a requirement for any filtering of these results that some might conduct to remove blog-type citations; but as with
1270:
sources. I just don't see how a very small number of outlier sources can automatically negate the vast majority of media outlets (including those that are commonly accepted as highly reliable soruces elsewhere???)
931:
being the owners of the Province and CTV. I didn't start the title, but I do question the motives of the name change...but oh, gee, questioning motives isn't acceptable right? yeah, right.... your styling of the
242:
120:
2162:
Stale again, this dates back more than a week to a time when it did appear to be a true disaster. Times change, more information becomes available, and a proper assessment of the true impact becomes possible.
1428:
use "disaster" is 71,000 hits. Closer examination of those may show that it's the same article, repeated across the news monopolies that dominate Canadian media i.e. the same article typically appears in the
2261:"Following a disaster in British Columbia this week, questions are being raised in northern Ontario about the safety of storing mine waste in tailings ponds. Pictured here are tailings ponds in Sudbury, Ont"
1423:
Quantitative evaluation of google searches is called for by most RM closers, but that doesn't mean that they can't be filtered for qualitative concerns. 317,000 hits minus the 244,000 that very POVishly do
2406:'Tests on water and trout in the waterways around a tailings pond breach in B.C.'s Interior remain within guidelines, but local First Nations aren't convinced the disaster won't have lasting repercussions.
606:
I've left the links bareboned rather than taking the time to copy-paste titles as this is only talkpage, so that an idea what's in each one can be seen; I will probably add more. I haven't looked at the
1581:
coverage of the event and the background and political criticism/aftermath arising from it. You have only thrown our red herrings and "get me a shrubbery" demands, that's all I'm hearing, and I do
2724:
behaviour when there are implication of COI and Paid Editing is...a tactic, to be polite...or seems to be, as I am not assuming bad faith and am willing to give you the benefit of the doubt as to
1586:
am familiar with the bag of tricks you're hauling out here, and the denunciation of facts and sources you don't want to hear...... you're a waste of time, and IMO that's your whole purpose here.
2904:
In light of the comments above, as a note to any interested, I do work in the mining industry but have no economic association with Imperial Metals, nor any economic association with Goldcorp.
2803:
article, where the technical and corporate data about the companies and the mine itself belong; I did as result of Sweet Nightmare's comment above, spend some time making a separate article for
2281:
So....CBC uses the term, and the foreman of the mine used that word when speaking of having warned the company of the problem beforehand. So to the POV denouncers of the term, put a sock in it.
2337:
1043:
to the event, and as the first non-North American major media to cover this, that they don't avoid the word "disaster" in their article is also duly noted per what the IP user said above.
2786:
overnight, please use the material provided to create a First Nations concerns section, and more balanced coverage than the rather dry material that is all that there is here so far...on
2486:
B.C. Mines Minister Bill Bennett says the Mount Polley tailings dam collapse is not an environmental disaster, equating it to the “thousands” of avalanches that happen annually in B.C.
2368:
However, Zorn said that from the eight guests they were hosting, they learned that news of the mine disaster was featured prominently in places such as Switzerland, Belgium and Germany.
2361:
However, Zorn said that from the eight guests they were hosting, they learned that news of the mine disaster was featured prominently in places such as Switzerland, Belgium and Germany.
2675:
I don't know if there is a way to raise a complaint about editors behavior towards other editors, so I will start by asking here that everyone please stick to respectful behaviour.
2791:
this article with WikiProject Mining, which also implied hoping that people from the mining sector of Knowledge (XXG) would add technical and corporate material; there is as yet no
1502:
Yet again, no sources to substantiate your claims. I have shown you, with evidence, why I consider VO to be a poor source for news. You have come back with.... nothing. Pathetic.
819:
You're not looking very far, then, and Google isn't doing its "job"; "disaster" is repeatedly used in articles listed above, including in titles, and in articles linked from them.
667:
for name information, and has a bit of historical info about its namesake; there may be more on him and on the lake from gold rush times, so it may warrant its own article.
2392:
3052:
1471:
are you here, as the IP user was, to bitch about the title and not do any actual work on the title; and to try to slander me for POV when your own is on clear display.
497:
1676:
inability to provide that proof you suddenly decide that it isn't the issue any more. Your opinion of "obvious" is not at all convincing an argument. Try again, again.
629:, whatever the rest of its name is, will also need an article as it's now very notable; its subsidaries like the Mount Polley Mining Corporation can be redirects maybe.
3042:
193:
1770:
communities affected by emergencies and disasters. EMBC is funding the deployment and information on how to access the services will be provided directly to residents
585:
471:
2014:
3092:
2967:. In the same way, someone who works for a computer company isn't disqualified from editing computing articles, providing the above mentioned criteria are met.
1957:
461:
565:
595:
2554:
Picky picky picky. The provincial Privacy Commissioner and the mayor of Williams Lake and the local MLA and the leader of the NDP and local residents and
2072:
3047:
2491:
Central B.C. First Nations, some area residents and Williams Lake mayor Kerry Cook have described the collapse of the dam as an “environmental disaster.”
344:
203:
575:
437:
222:
116:
3037:
2616:
2246:
3077:
1922:
and probably reined in the editor and its writers. The fact remains taht local residents, the local MLA, the provincial Privacy Commissioner, and
1451:
and "poor journalism", as for your insistence I provide "claims of corporate-political links and inherent bias in mainstream media sources".....
334:
570:
310:
590:
656:
2444:
3087:
3067:
2471:
2713:
2417:
3082:
2691:
1316:
1271:
802:
39:
410:
367:
306:
169:
1050:
How to filter out results from other Canadian papers in the media chain(s) the Sun, Province and CTV are part of , and likewise whatever
2272:
But environmental groups like Mining Watch Canada remain skeptical that full-site rehabilitation after such a disaster is ever possible.
784:
655:, it's only 1255 m / 4117 feet high, with prominence 271m. I'm thinking that title should probably just redirect to this article, with
52:
600:
2709:
419:
2112:
Again, both cases of the CBC reporting verbatim what third parties have said. This does not make it the CBC that has used the term.
660:
799:
48:
912:(XXG)'s continued use of the more sensational term does start to look like POV pushing rather than balanced encyclopedic content.
3072:
586:
http://www.straight.com/news/704041/mount-polley-mine-owner-imperial-metals-corp-only-recently-joined-national-mining-association
1872:
Nothing since August 8 though, that's interesting. Actually the latest WLT coverage has avoided using the "disaster" term. See:
580:
949:
sources; and frankly, there's more detail and actual pertinent material in those publications on various topics than there has
868:
1567:
Two days of arguing with negative contrarians wanting to sanitize the article's title to suit their political agenda; and you
503:
Huffington Post commentary re implications for US mines including a 10x larger tailings pond proposed near Bristol Bay, Alaska
302:
289:
266:
160:
111:
86:
2859:
and not exluding information from one side or the other; I'm into inclusion and expansion, and have long sought for balanced/
2204:
Gerald MacBurney was a foreman at the Mount Polley Mine for 7 years and says he warned management of a disaster in the making
2096:"The Mount Polley disaster is being viewed as a consequence of what happens when you simply abrogate your responsibilities."
566:
http://www.vancouverobserver.com/news/world/imperial-metals-wanted-detoxify-mount-polley-tailings-overlooked-other-problems
2963:
any party mentioned), then I don't think that you have a conflict of interest, notwithstanding that should you maintain a
1577:
perhaps was his, and perhaps your, whole purpose here; to prevent making the article into what it should be, a summary of
507:
611:
article, if there is one, but this tailings disaster is another nail in the coffin of that shelved project; among others.
596:
http://www.straight.com/news/703411/environmentalist-credits-regional-district-filming-tailings-flowing-mount-polley-mine
433:
886:
405:
2792:
981:
independent media here sounds a bit too much like the stuff that comes from the climate denial to be taken seriously.
502:
2796:
1078:
And important to note, per the IP user's "who's calling it a disaster?" the first time the word "disaster" occurs in
798:
It appears virtually all media sources are terming it either "Mount Polley Mine Spill" or "Mount Polley Mine Breach"
60:
493:
I have no time to expand this article, but there's plenty of material out there in addition to what's already here:
1047:
are using the word, the UBCIC is using the word, the Cariboo Regional District is using the word....shall I go on?
576:
http://www.vancouverobserver.com/news/understaffing-deregulation-blame-mount-polley-tailings-pond-disaster-critics
2882:
2077:, Canadian Press, August 13, 2014, containing the following statement from Union of BC Indian Chiefs Grand Chief
1446:
use that term, including the Cariboo Regional District and the UBCIC and more, has decided he's lost and accused
851:
725:
1896:
name, do you see?) If they were always and only called for disasters they would be called "States of Disaster".
423:
2997:
2949:
2909:
2886:
2863:
coverage of anything I work on here, whether it's history, geography, FN material, biographies, town articles,
2687:
676:
1320:
1275:
806:
788:
571:
http://www.vancouverobserver.com/news/calls-about-mount-polley-tailings-breach-allegedly-went-unanswered-hours
294:
92:
1759:, posted August 8, 2014, no author given, containing the following from a statement by local MLA Carol Oakes:
783:
Who's calling it a "disaster"? I would think and inflammatory title like this would need to be well sourced?
591:
http://www.straight.com/news/703116/mount-polley-tailings-pond-breach-could-result-first-nations-legal-action
1225:
Your assessment of them as "poor journalism" is yet more POV maundering; I am not abusing you, I am calling
2679:
2445:
http://www.vancouversun.com/privacy+commissioner+investigate+Mount+Polley+mine+collapse/10118694/story.html
1712:
1702:
427:
2267:
The recent disaster at the Mount Polley Mine released billions of litres of wastewater into river systems.
301:
and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the
2328:
It seems we don't have to use "rabble rousers" and "ideologically-driven" "poor journalism", the "sober"
1927:
2748:
2496:
Bennett acknowledged the dam collapse may be a mining industry, a geotechnical and a political disaster.
1330:
contribute once in a blue moon; your only other edit has been on the MH-17 downing. And yes, I do have
168:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
560:
533:
of coverage and important information in BC's various independent media; here's from the "top three",
55:. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about
3019:
1059:
846:
720:
668:
2787:
2138:
2078:
550:
514:
Many statements are contradictory, but that's nothing new in enviro/corporate politicking either....
426:
articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly
74:
2993:
2945:
2905:
2683:
2630:
1852:
since 1975 (that chain's first newspaper) and was founded as an offshoot of Ma and George Murray's
1835:
Louie was very disappointed that nobody from Imperial Metals contacted the band after the disaster.
672:
601:
http://www.straight.com/news/704111/engineering-company-distances-itself-mount-polley-mine-disaster
415:
1914:
The article was launched on August 8, it is now nine days since then. That's not "out of date".
2930:
2894:
2840:
2816:
2757:
2738:
2661:
2638:
2612:
2564:
2525:
2286:
1935:
1862:
1658:
1591:
1526:
1492:
1340:
1234:
1181:
1135:
1095:
1090:
applies to the comment about me "biting" the IP user per his incantation of the government's POV.
1068:
986:
894:
876:
837:
824:
766:
743:
704:
684:
634:
616:
519:
398:
800:
https://www.google.com/search?q=Mount+Polley#q=Mount+Polley&safe=off&start=0&tbm=nws
382:
361:
2851:
Here's the deal: You don't call me names, and I won't call you names, and we both work on this
2394:
Tests okay, but First Nation wants long-term studies before consuming fish near tailings breach
1084:" British Columbia’s government has insisted the dam failure is not an environmental disaster."
212:
17:
2808:
2800:
754:
555:
56:
44:
2964:
2944:
but would appreciate guidance from others (Skookum1 you have given me your view, thank you).
2720:
mining company or association somewhere, if not Imperial Metals or GoldCorp. so going after
2339:
Cariboo tourism appears to have dodged public-relations hit from jarring Mount Polley imagery
1226:
1087:
841:
757:
which may suit a separate article, and if not could redirect to the mountain article...or to
581:
http://www.vancouverobserver.com/news/grand-chief-compares-mount-polley-disaster-exxon-valdez
2767:
2581:
2543:
2304:
2227:
2170:
2119:
2053:
1995:
1903:
1683:
1609:
1551:
1509:
1393:
1214:
1160:
919:
392:
2959:
2777:
2772:
2729:
2725:
2705:
2622:
Could people please edit this article with proper references and without personal attacks ?
2517:
1781:
3015:
2874:
2220:
Yet again, verbatim reportage. Not a term employed by the CBC or its reporter themselves.
758:
626:
608:
2189:
1988:
Reporting what local residents are calling it doesn't make that the position of the CBC.
1127:
3014:
Expanded the lead of the article, added a trusted source that confirms the information、
2716:
and more.....I'm not saying your paid, but in all likelihood you are under contract to
1645:
and the corporate world are not at issue for the purpose of this talkpage, which is to
2811:
could be a subsection there, as the mountain itself is not otherwise all that notable.
2597:
845:
719:
3031:
2926:
2890:
2878:
2836:
2812:
2753:
2734:
2657:
2634:
2608:
2560:
2521:
2282:
1931:
1858:
1654:
1587:
1522:
1488:
1336:
1230:
1177:
1131:
1091:
1064:
1051:
982:
890:
872:
820:
762:
739:
700:
680:
630:
612:
515:
152:
2807:
which has the citation from BC Minfile about the mine's geology and claims history;
664:
2968:
2804:
644:
2473:
Mount Polley dam breach not an environmental disaster: Mines Minister Bill Bennett
1736:
840:; no article linked there contains "disaster" in its title. Skookum1 please don't
2576:
2538:
2299:
2222:
2165:
2144:
2114:
2048:
1990:
1915:
1898:
1849:
1678:
1604:
1546:
1504:
1388:
1209:
1155:
1122:
1055:
914:
281:
260:
2194:, CBC Player copy of aired news coverage, containing the following introduction
1887:
1881:
1875:
1819:
1754:
1746:
1728:
1720:
2598:
what's more important? Expanding the article from sources, or a name dispute?
2352:
The travellers saw news about the mine disaster on televisions at the airport.
388:
142:
136:
105:
2776:
silence me on this page to further the POV your edits have been about....is
3023:
3001:
2973:
2953:
2934:
2913:
2898:
2844:
2820:
2695:
2665:
2641:
2587:
2568:
2549:
2529:
2310:
2290:
2233:
2176:
2125:
2074:
First Nation aims to evict Imperial Metals over Mount Polley tailings spill
2059:
2001:
1939:
1909:
1866:
1689:
1662:
1615:
1595:
1557:
1530:
1515:
1496:
1399:
1344:
1324:
1279:
1238:
1220:
1185:
1166:
1139:
1099:
1072:
990:
925:
898:
880:
857:
828:
810:
792:
770:
747:
731:
708:
688:
652:
638:
620:
523:
232:
867:
Apples and oranges, SN, I said nothing about oil spills; and duh, there's
2448:
B.C.'s privacy commissioner to investigate Mount Polley mine dam collapse
761:
once it's created. I included the BC MinFile report as an external link.
2016:
Mount Polley tailings pond breach investigated by B.C. privacy watchdog
2885:(not sure of the MoM's article name, Premier Bennett II I think is at
298:
165:
3063:
High-importance Political parties and politicians in Canada articles
1959:
Mount Polley Mine tailings pond breach called environmental disaster
1748:
CRD confirms representation at mine disaster meeting in Likely today
1126:
which is a global newspaper published, I believe, twice weekly, has
2835:, and that Australian Mine Safety Journal "not proper references"??
561:
http://thetyee.ca/News/2014/08/08/Mine-and-Dam-Inspections-Dropped/
2248:
Tailings ponds in northern Ontario considered safe, scientist says
2148:
1756:
Oakes updates the public on Mount Polley Mine tailings pond breach
508:
Mining.com's coverage, again in relation to concerns over US mines
551:
http://thetyee.ca/News/2014/08/09/Imperial-Metals-Monetary-Gifts/
2984:
Late addition of references for "largest environmental disaster"
2607:
expansion, not an UNDUE and time-consuming battle over its name.
2419:
Red Chris mine blockade to remain pending review, protesters say
1722:
Likely residents fear the worst after Mount Polley Mine disaster
2652:
as my own by way of the untimestamped 3-tilde sigs in brackets.
675:
are rather small, though because of all Cariboo names being on
68:
26:
2498:
Bennett is the current Minister of Mines for British Columbia
2046:
This one is fair enough, they did use the term in this case.
3058:
C-Class Political parties and politicians in Canada articles
2958:
As an uninvolved editor I'd just like to point out that the
2019:, Canadian Press, August 14, 2014, containing the following:
231:
211:
1825:, Sean Glanville, August 7, 2014, containing the following:
556:
http://thetyee.ca/News/2014/08/09/Mine-Spill-Water-Effects/
1803:“If it comes down, then we are just starting our disaster.
1972:
Local residents are calling it an environmental disaster.
1787:, Carol Mindus, August 6, 2014, containing the following:
1876:
Government releases sediment sample results from Aug. 10
1782:
http://www.wltribune.com/news/270183061.html?mobile=true
1730:
Mayor Kerry Cook responds to Mount Polley Mine disaster
945:"Balanced encyclopedic content" means inclusiveness of
243:
WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada
2771:
consider all I have said, and take some time to study
1454:....but the sources I would provide, aside from being
305:, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the
2462:
Denham is the Government of BC's Privacy Commissioner
1962:, CBC News, August 4, 2014, containing the following:
1733:, posted and updated August 8, 2014 (no author given)
1462:. Filtering the google searches takes time and is a
2251:, CBC News, August 7, 2014, containing the following
1805:, from quotes from lakefront resident Pohney Whitmer
1751:, posted and updated August 8, 2014, no author given
164:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2752:by easy searches for citations....well, whatever (
1120:, none have any coverage of this at all yet. The
1882:Polley Lake water test results expected this week
1926:and other papers used the word; Stop flogging a
999:google-search comparison of what the sources use
663:on the redirect. BC Names' entry refers to the
2476:, Gordon Hoekstra, August 12, 2014, containing:
2450:, Gordon Hoekstra, August 14, 2014, containing:
2342:, Derrick Penner, August 15, 2014], containing:
2397:, Canadian Press, August 15, 2014, containing:
1335:government/corporate's penchant for newspeak.
414:to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of the
8:
1820:http://www.wltribune.com/news/270394261.html
1033:244,000 do not use "disaster" in their texts
297:to organize and improve articles related to
699:has any name or historical info.....as yet.
1948:more articles using "disaster" from CBC.ca
1888:Mine spill tests turn to long-term effects
1785:Steps underway to remediate tailings spill
356:
255:
100:
3053:High-importance British Columbia articles
1738:Mount Polley Mine Disaster Hurts Everyone
1108:as a "left-wing rag", I just checked the
1011:"Mount Polley tailings breach" -wikipedia
2925:and formatting edits. Good night again.
2191:Foreman warned of tailings pond disaster
1823:First Nations leaders slam mine policies
1716:, the main paper in the Cariboo region:
1700:more articles using "disaster" from the
1023:"Mount Polley tailings spill" -wikipedia
3043:High-importance Canada-related articles
2370:(Zorn operator of a local tour company)
1017:"Mount Polley mine disaster" -wikipedia
446:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Environment
358:
257:
102:
72:
1651:Either improve the article or GET LOST
657:Category:Mountains of British Columbia
2518:many articles with "disaster" in them
1005:"Mount Polley mine breach" -wikipedia
7:
3093:High-importance Environment articles
287:This article is within the scope of
158:This article is within the scope of
871:. Is that a POV title also, then??
785:Special:Contributions/154.20.22.233
91:It is of interest to the following
2629:Note: Could people (or maybe just
319:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Mining
178:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Canada
25:
3048:C-Class British Columbia articles
2140:Horgan weighs in on mine disaster
1725:, Sage Birchwater, August 6, 2014
695:for the same person, but none of
661:Category:Geography of the Cariboo
498:CBC News British Columbia article
966:in Canadian history. And it is.
679:it may be worth a stub at least.
449:Template:WikiProject Environment
434:Knowledge (XXG):Contributing FAQ
391:
381:
360:
280:
259:
145:
135:
104:
73:
30:
3038:C-Class Canada-related articles
2797:Mount Polley Mining Corporation
2263:, caption lead photo on article
1848:is a weekly newspaper owned by
869:List of environmental disasters
466:This article has been rated as
339:This article has been rated as
198:This article has been rated as
18:Talk:Mount Polley mine disaster
3078:Mid-importance Mining articles
436:and leave any messages at the
1:
3024:18:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
1878:, August 16 - uses "incident"
885:And, gee, look what I found.
647:to article, or not to article
240:This article is supported by
220:This article is supported by
172:and see a list of open tasks.
43:for general discussion about
3088:C-Class Environment articles
3068:All WikiProject Canada pages
2780:.16:25, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
2317:usages of "disaster" in the
1742:, Ken Wilson, August 8, 2014
887:1947 Centralia mine disaster
223:WikiProject British Columbia
3083:WikiProject Mining articles
3002:00:34, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
2974:20:17, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
2954:17:27, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
2935:17:11, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
2920:articles/subjects that you
2914:16:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
2899:16:43, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
2845:16:27, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
2821:16:36, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
2793:Imperial Metals Corporation
2714:WP:Paid editing (guideline)
2696:15:29, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
2666:10:01, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
2642:09:21, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
2617:16:40, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
2588:09:07, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
2569:00:58, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
2550:21:26, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
2530:05:31, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
2377:"She" being MLA Carol Oakes
2311:21:03, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
2291:02:14, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
2234:21:03, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
2177:21:03, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
2126:21:03, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
2060:21:03, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
2002:21:03, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
1940:05:03, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
1910:20:50, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
1867:01:48, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
1690:19:11, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
1663:06:15, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
1616:15:50, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
1596:14:55, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
1558:15:50, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
1531:14:47, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
1516:14:31, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
1497:14:20, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
1400:13:57, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
1345:06:35, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
1325:05:51, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
1280:05:39, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
1239:04:15, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
1221:02:05, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
1186:01:37, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
1167:18:54, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
1140:17:01, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
1104:for those who might styled
1100:16:48, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
1073:16:35, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
1031:- 317,000 results of which
991:16:16, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
926:15:57, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
899:17:16, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
881:16:52, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
858:15:31, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
829:06:29, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
811:16:47, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
793:16:35, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
771:02:02, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
748:01:40, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
732:16:05, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
709:02:41, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
689:02:36, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
639:04:11, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
621:02:26, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
524:01:33, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
322:Template:WikiProject Mining
181:Template:WikiProject Canada
3109:
1890:, August 13 - uses "spill"
1884:, August 15 - uses "spill"
1854:Bridge River-Lillooet News
472:project's importance scale
345:project's importance scale
204:project's importance scale
2883:Bill Bennett (politician)
1029:"Mount Polley mine spill"
625:Just a further note that
465:
376:
338:
275:
239:
219:
197:
130:
99:
2887:William Richards Bennett
2710:WP:Paid editing (policy)
2151:and MLA for Juan de Fuca
1634:topic of this discussion
1460:you sound just like them
677:Cariboo (disambiguation)
3073:C-Class Mining articles
2827:And since when are the
836:"Disaster" is POV. See
665:their Polley Lake entry
489:news coverage resources
411:WikiProject Environment
408:article is part of the
184:Canada-related articles
418:. The aim is to write
236:
216:
81:This article is rated
3010:Improving the article
2965:neutral point of view
2749:Great Bear Rainforest
2147:is the leader of the
1713:Williams Lake Tribune
1703:Williams Lake Tribune
235:
215:
85:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1060:BC Legislature Raids
697:the BC Names entries
651:I just looked it up
452:Environment articles
47:. Any such comments
1647:discuss the article
406:environment-related
2143:, August 6, 2014 (
838:List of oil spills
543:Vancouver Observer
399:Environment portal
293:, a collaborative
290:WikiProject Mining
237:
217:
161:WikiProject Canada
87:content assessment
42:
2809:Mount Polley Mine
2801:Mount Polley Mine
2699:
2682:comment added by
2646:
755:Mount Polley Mine
486:
485:
482:
481:
478:
477:
438:project talk page
355:
354:
351:
350:
254:
253:
250:
249:
67:
66:
57:Mount Polley mine
45:Mount Polley mine
38:
16:(Redirected from
3100:
2971:
2768:Talk:Marlin Mine
2698:
2676:
2627:
2584:
2579:
2546:
2541:
2307:
2302:
2230:
2225:
2173:
2168:
2122:
2117:
2056:
2051:
1998:
1993:
1906:
1901:
1686:
1681:
1624:OK, here ya go,
1612:
1607:
1554:
1549:
1512:
1507:
1396:
1391:
1217:
1212:
1163:
1158:
1025:- 38,900 results
1019:- 94,400 results
1007:- 33,000 results
922:
917:
856:
854:
849:
730:
728:
723:
539:Georgia Straight
454:
453:
450:
447:
444:
401:
396:
395:
385:
378:
377:
372:
364:
357:
327:
326:
323:
320:
317:
311:join the project
284:
277:
276:
271:
263:
256:
186:
185:
182:
179:
176:
155:
150:
149:
148:
139:
132:
131:
126:
123:
117:British Columbia
108:
101:
84:
78:
77:
69:
34:
33:
27:
21:
3108:
3107:
3103:
3102:
3101:
3099:
3098:
3097:
3028:
3027:
3012:
2986:
2969:
2875:Imperial Metals
2677:
2624:
2600:
2582:
2577:
2544:
2539:
2322:
2305:
2300:
2228:
2223:
2171:
2166:
2120:
2115:
2054:
2049:
1996:
1991:
1950:
1904:
1899:
1707:
1684:
1679:
1610:
1605:
1552:
1547:
1510:
1505:
1394:
1389:
1215:
1210:
1207:providing any?
1161:
1156:
1110:Times of London
1001:
920:
915:
852:
847:
781:
759:Imperial Metals
726:
721:
669:Hazeltine Creek
649:
627:Imperial Metals
609:Prosperity Mine
491:
468:High-importance
451:
448:
445:
442:
441:
424:well-referenced
397:
390:
371:High‑importance
370:
325:Mining articles
324:
321:
318:
315:
314:
269:
200:High-importance
183:
180:
177:
174:
173:
151:
146:
144:
125:High‑importance
124:
114:
82:
31:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
3106:
3104:
3096:
3095:
3090:
3085:
3080:
3075:
3070:
3065:
3060:
3055:
3050:
3045:
3040:
3030:
3029:
3011:
3008:
3007:
3006:
3005:
3004:
2994:DiligentDavidG
2985:
2982:
2981:
2980:
2979:
2978:
2977:
2976:
2946:DiligentDavidG
2938:
2937:
2906:DiligentDavidG
2902:
2901:
2869:
2868:
2848:
2847:
2833:Financial Post
2824:
2823:
2782:
2781:
2762:
2761:
2743:
2742:
2708:sometime, and
2684:DiligentDavidG
2669:
2668:
2653:
2648:
2647:
2631:DiligentDavidG
2623:
2620:
2599:
2596:
2595:
2594:
2593:
2592:
2591:
2590:
2510:
2509:
2508:
2507:
2506:
2505:
2499:
2493:
2488:
2478:
2477:
2468:
2467:
2466:
2465:
2464:
2463:
2452:
2451:
2440:
2439:
2438:
2437:
2436:
2435:
2424:
2423:
2414:
2413:
2412:
2411:
2410:
2409:
2399:
2398:
2389:
2388:
2387:
2386:
2385:
2384:
2378:
2371:
2358:
2357:
2356:
2355:
2354:
2344:
2343:
2326:
2325:
2321:
2315:
2314:
2313:
2279:
2278:
2277:
2276:
2275:
2274:
2269:
2264:
2253:
2252:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2237:
2236:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2206:
2196:
2195:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2180:
2179:
2153:
2152:
2135:
2134:
2133:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2129:
2128:
2103:
2102:
2101:
2100:
2099:
2098:
2093:
2083:
2082:
2079:Stewart Philip
2069:
2068:
2067:
2066:
2065:
2064:
2063:
2062:
2037:
2036:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2021:
2020:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2004:
1979:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1964:
1963:
1949:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1885:
1879:
1857:non-disasters.
1842:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1827:
1826:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1800:
1789:
1788:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1761:
1760:
1752:
1744:
1734:
1726:
1706:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1619:
1618:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1481:Globe and Mall
1439:Ottawa Citizen
1435:Globe and Mail
1421:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1317:154.20.228.233
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1272:154.20.228.233
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1118:New York Times
1036:
1035:
1026:
1020:
1014:
1013:42,600 results
1008:
1000:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
970:
969:
968:
967:
940:
939:
938:
937:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
834:
833:
832:
831:
814:
813:
803:154.20.228.233
780:
777:
776:
775:
774:
773:
712:
711:
653:in bivouac.com
648:
642:
604:
603:
598:
593:
588:
583:
578:
573:
568:
563:
558:
553:
547:
546:
512:
511:
505:
500:
490:
487:
484:
483:
480:
479:
476:
475:
464:
458:
457:
455:
431:
403:
402:
386:
374:
373:
365:
353:
352:
349:
348:
341:Mid-importance
337:
331:
330:
328:
285:
273:
272:
270:Mid‑importance
264:
252:
251:
248:
247:
238:
228:
227:
218:
208:
207:
196:
190:
189:
187:
170:the discussion
157:
156:
140:
128:
127:
109:
97:
96:
90:
79:
65:
64:
61:Reference desk
49:may be removed
35:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3105:
3094:
3091:
3089:
3086:
3084:
3081:
3079:
3076:
3074:
3071:
3069:
3066:
3064:
3061:
3059:
3056:
3054:
3051:
3049:
3046:
3044:
3041:
3039:
3036:
3035:
3033:
3026:
3025:
3021:
3017:
3009:
3003:
2999:
2995:
2990:
2989:
2988:
2987:
2983:
2975:
2972:
2966:
2961:
2960:COI guideline
2957:
2956:
2955:
2951:
2947:
2942:
2941:
2940:
2939:
2936:
2932:
2928:
2923:
2918:
2917:
2916:
2915:
2911:
2907:
2900:
2896:
2892:
2888:
2884:
2880:
2879:Christy Clark
2876:
2871:
2870:
2866:
2862:
2858:
2854:
2850:
2849:
2846:
2842:
2838:
2834:
2830:
2829:National Post
2826:
2825:
2822:
2818:
2814:
2810:
2806:
2802:
2798:
2794:
2789:
2784:
2783:
2779:
2774:
2769:
2764:
2763:
2759:
2755:
2750:
2745:
2744:
2740:
2736:
2731:
2727:
2723:
2719:
2715:
2711:
2707:
2702:
2701:
2700:
2697:
2693:
2689:
2685:
2681:
2673:
2667:
2663:
2659:
2654:
2650:
2649:
2645:
2643:
2640:
2636:
2632:
2626:
2625:
2621:
2619:
2618:
2614:
2610:
2606:
2589:
2586:
2585:
2580:
2572:
2571:
2570:
2566:
2562:
2557:
2553:
2552:
2551:
2548:
2547:
2542:
2534:
2533:
2532:
2531:
2527:
2523:
2519:
2515:
2504:
2500:
2497:
2494:
2492:
2489:
2487:
2484:
2483:
2482:
2481:
2480:
2479:
2475:
2474:
2470:
2469:
2461:
2458:
2457:
2456:
2455:
2454:
2453:
2449:
2446:
2442:
2441:
2434:
2430:
2429:
2428:
2427:
2426:
2425:
2422:, containing:
2421:
2420:
2416:
2415:
2408:
2405:
2404:
2403:
2402:
2401:
2400:
2396:
2395:
2391:
2390:
2383:
2379:
2376:
2372:
2369:
2366:
2365:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2359:
2353:
2350:
2349:
2348:
2347:
2346:
2345:
2341:
2340:
2336:
2335:
2334:
2331:
2330:Vancouver Sun
2324:
2323:
2320:
2319:Vancouver Sun
2316:
2312:
2309:
2308:
2303:
2295:
2294:
2293:
2292:
2288:
2284:
2273:
2270:
2268:
2265:
2262:
2259:
2258:
2257:
2256:
2255:
2254:
2250:
2249:
2245:
2244:
2235:
2232:
2231:
2226:
2219:
2218:
2217:
2216:
2215:
2214:
2213:
2212:
2205:
2202:
2201:
2200:
2199:
2198:
2197:
2193:
2192:
2188:
2187:
2178:
2175:
2174:
2169:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2154:
2150:
2146:
2142:
2141:
2137:
2136:
2127:
2124:
2123:
2118:
2111:
2110:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2104:
2097:
2094:
2092:
2089:
2088:
2087:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2080:
2076:
2075:
2071:
2070:
2061:
2058:
2057:
2052:
2045:
2044:
2043:
2042:
2041:
2040:
2039:
2038:
2031:
2027:
2026:
2025:
2024:
2023:
2022:
2018:
2017:
2013:
2012:
2003:
2000:
1999:
1994:
1987:
1986:
1985:
1984:
1983:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1973:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1961:
1960:
1956:
1955:
1954:
1947:
1941:
1937:
1933:
1929:
1925:
1921:
1918:controls the
1917:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1908:
1907:
1902:
1894:
1889:
1886:
1883:
1880:
1877:
1874:
1873:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1864:
1860:
1855:
1851:
1847:
1836:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1824:
1821:
1817:
1816:
1809:
1807:
1806:
1801:
1799:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1791:
1790:
1786:
1783:
1779:
1778:
1771:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1758:
1757:
1753:
1750:
1749:
1745:
1743:
1740:
1739:
1735:
1732:
1731:
1727:
1724:
1723:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1715:
1714:
1705:
1704:
1699:
1691:
1688:
1687:
1682:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1643:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1617:
1614:
1613:
1608:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1593:
1589:
1584:
1580:
1575:
1570:
1559:
1556:
1555:
1550:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1514:
1513:
1508:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1478:
1472:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1456:already given
1452:
1449:
1445:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1431:Vancouver Sun
1427:
1401:
1398:
1397:
1392:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1333:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1219:
1218:
1213:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1165:
1164:
1159:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1124:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1082:s article is
1081:
1080:The Guardian'
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1052:Glacier Media
1048:
1046:
1042:
1034:
1030:
1027:
1024:
1021:
1018:
1015:
1012:
1009:
1006:
1003:
1002:
998:
992:
988:
984:
979:
974:
973:
972:
971:
965:
960:
956:
952:
948:
944:
943:
942:
941:
934:
929:
928:
927:
924:
923:
918:
910:
909:
900:
896:
892:
888:
884:
883:
882:
878:
874:
870:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
859:
855:
850:
843:
839:
830:
826:
822:
818:
817:
816:
815:
812:
808:
804:
801:
797:
796:
795:
794:
790:
786:
778:
772:
768:
764:
760:
756:
751:
750:
749:
745:
741:
736:
735:
734:
733:
729:
724:
717:
710:
706:
702:
698:
693:
692:
691:
690:
686:
682:
678:
674:
673:Cariboo Creek
670:
666:
662:
658:
654:
646:
643:
641:
640:
636:
632:
628:
623:
622:
618:
614:
610:
602:
599:
597:
594:
592:
589:
587:
584:
582:
579:
577:
574:
572:
569:
567:
564:
562:
559:
557:
554:
552:
549:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
527:
526:
525:
521:
517:
509:
506:
504:
501:
499:
496:
495:
494:
488:
473:
469:
463:
460:
459:
456:
439:
435:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
412:
407:
400:
394:
389:
387:
384:
380:
379:
375:
369:
366:
363:
359:
346:
342:
336:
333:
332:
329:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
291:
286:
283:
279:
278:
274:
268:
265:
262:
258:
245:
244:
234:
230:
229:
225:
224:
214:
210:
209:
205:
201:
195:
192:
191:
188:
171:
167:
163:
162:
154:
153:Canada portal
143:
141:
138:
134:
133:
129:
122:
118:
113:
110:
107:
103:
98:
94:
88:
80:
76:
71:
70:
62:
58:
54:
50:
46:
41:
37:This page is
36:
29:
28:
19:
3013:
2921:
2903:
2864:
2860:
2856:
2852:
2832:
2828:
2805:Mount Polley
2721:
2717:
2678:— Preceding
2674:
2670:
2628:
2604:
2601:
2575:
2556:The Guardian
2555:
2537:
2513:
2511:
2501:
2495:
2490:
2485:
2472:
2459:
2447:
2431:
2418:
2407:
2393:
2380:
2373:
2367:
2360:
2351:
2338:
2329:
2327:
2318:
2298:
2280:
2271:
2266:
2260:
2247:
2221:
2203:
2190:
2164:
2139:
2113:
2095:
2090:
2073:
2047:
2028:
2015:
1989:
1971:
1958:
1953:journalism:
1951:
1928:WP:DEADHORSE
1924:The Guardian
1923:
1919:
1897:
1853:
1845:
1843:
1834:
1822:
1808:
1804:
1802:
1796:
1784:
1768:
1755:
1747:
1741:
1737:
1729:
1721:
1711:
1708:
1701:
1677:
1650:
1646:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1603:
1582:
1578:
1573:
1568:
1566:
1545:
1503:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1473:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1453:
1447:
1443:
1438:
1434:
1430:
1425:
1422:
1387:
1331:
1208:
1173:
1154:
1128:two articles
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1106:The Guardian
1105:
1083:
1079:
1049:
1044:
1041:The Guardian
1040:
1037:
977:
963:
958:
954:
953:been in the
950:
946:
932:
913:
844:IP users. -
835:
782:
714:Take a look
713:
650:
645:Mount Polley
624:
605:
542:
538:
534:
530:
513:
492:
467:
409:
340:
303:project page
288:
241:
221:
199:
159:
93:WikiProjects
2795:page not a
2145:John Horgan
1916:Black Press
1850:Black Press
1464:red herring
1123:Epoch Times
1114:Independent
1056:Black Press
933:independent
443:Environment
428:categorized
416:environment
368:Environment
40:not a forum
3032:Categories
3016:Fund Barra
2788:WP:CANTALK
2559:answer....
1433:as in the
853:Nightmares
727:Nightmares
307:discussion
53:refactored
2030:occurred.
1798:officials
1574:knowledge
1063:rousers".
779:Disaster?
2970:Philg88
2927:Skookum1
2891:Skookum1
2865:whatever
2861:complete
2857:balanced
2837:Skookum1
2813:Skookum1
2754:Skookum1
2735:Skookum1
2692:contribs
2680:unsigned
2658:Skookum1
2635:Bishonen
2609:Skookum1
2605:balanced
2561:Skookum1
2522:Skookum1
2514:Province
2503:disaster
2433:occurred
2375:Cariboo.
2283:Skookum1
1932:Skookum1
1859:Skookum1
1655:Skookum1
1588:Skookum1
1523:Skookum1
1489:Skookum1
1483:and CTV
1437:and the
1337:Skookum1
1231:Skookum1
1178:Skookum1
1132:Skookum1
1116:and the
1092:Skookum1
1065:Skookum1
983:Skookum1
964:disaster
959:Province
891:Skookum1
873:Skookum1
821:Skookum1
763:Skookum1
740:Skookum1
701:Skookum1
681:Skookum1
631:Skookum1
613:Skookum1
541:and the
535:The Tyee
529:There's
516:Skookum1
121:Politics
1920:Tribune
1846:Tribune
1632:of the
1630:sources
1485:weren't
1332:respect
1227:WP:DUCK
1088:WP:DUCK
842:WP:BITE
470:on the
420:neutral
343:on the
295:project
202:on the
83:C-class
59:at the
2853:fairly
2831:, the
2778:WP:AGF
2773:WP:COI
2730:WP:COI
2726:WP:AGF
2706:WP:COI
1638:STUPID
1628:as to
1112:, the
537:, the
316:Mining
299:mining
267:Mining
175:Canada
166:Canada
112:Canada
89:scale.
2578:Pyrop
2540:Pyrop
2301:Pyrop
2224:Pyrop
2167:Pyrop
2149:BCNDP
2116:Pyrop
2050:Pyrop
1992:Pyrop
1900:Pyrop
1680:Pyrop
1642:FALSE
1626:FACTS
1606:Pyrop
1548:Pyrop
1506:Pyrop
1390:Pyrop
1211:Pyrop
1157:Pyrop
916:Pyrop
848:Sweet
738:lots.
722:Sweet
432:Read
404:This
309:, or
3020:talk
2998:talk
2950:talk
2931:talk
2910:talk
2895:talk
2855:and
2841:talk
2817:talk
2758:talk
2739:talk
2728:and
2718:some
2712:and
2688:talk
2662:talk
2639:talk
2613:talk
2565:talk
2526:talk
2516:has
2512:The
2287:talk
1936:talk
1863:talk
1844:The
1659:talk
1640:and
1592:talk
1527:talk
1493:talk
1479:and
1468:your
1341:talk
1321:talk
1276:talk
1235:talk
1182:talk
1174:LOTS
1136:talk
1096:talk
1069:talk
1054:and
1045:They
987:talk
951:ever
895:talk
877:talk
825:talk
807:talk
789:talk
767:talk
744:talk
716:here
705:talk
685:talk
671:and
659:and
635:talk
617:talk
531:lots
520:talk
462:High
422:and
194:High
2881:or
2877:or
2382:it.
1583:not
1579:all
1477:Sun
1426:not
1086:so
957:or
955:Sun
947:all
335:Mid
51:or
3034::
3022:)
3000:)
2952:)
2933:)
2922:do
2912:)
2897:)
2843:)
2819:)
2760:))
2741:))
2722:my
2694:)
2690:•
2664:)
2637:|
2615:)
2567:)
2528:)
2289:)
1938:)
1865:)
1661:)
1594:)
1569:do
1529:)
1495:)
1448:me
1444:do
1343:)
1323:)
1278:)
1237:)
1184:)
1138:)
1098:)
1071:)
989:)
978:IS
897:)
879:)
827:)
809:)
791:)
769:)
746:)
707:)
687:)
637:)
619:)
522:)
119:/
115::
3018:(
2996:(
2948:(
2929:(
2908:(
2893:(
2839:(
2815:(
2799:/
2756:(
2737:(
2686:(
2660:(
2644:.
2611:(
2583:e
2563:(
2545:e
2524:(
2443:[
2306:e
2285:(
2229:e
2172:e
2121:e
2081::
2055:e
1997:e
1934:(
1905:e
1861:(
1818:[
1780:[
1685:e
1657:(
1653:.
1611:e
1590:(
1553:e
1525:(
1511:e
1491:(
1487:.
1395:e
1339:(
1319:(
1274:(
1233:(
1216:e
1180:(
1176:.
1162:e
1134:(
1130:.
1094:(
1067:(
985:(
921:e
893:(
889:.
875:(
823:(
805:(
787:(
765:(
742:(
703:(
683:(
633:(
615:(
545:.
518:(
510:.
474:.
440:.
430:.
347:.
313:.
246:.
226:.
206:.
95::
63:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
