2497:. The first sense of "assume" in the OED is "to take unto (oneself), receive, accept, adopt.ā The term was originally employed in religious contexts as in āto receive up into heaven,ā especially āthe reception of the Virgin Mary into heaven, with body preserved from corruption,ā (1297 CE) but it was also simply used to refer to āreceive into associationā or āadopt into partnership.ā Moreover, other senses of assumere included (i) āinvesting oneself with (an attribute), ā (ii) āto undertakeā (especially in Law), (iii) āto take to oneself in appearance only, to pretend to possess,ā and (iv) āto suppose a thing to beā (all senses from OED entry on āassumeā; the OED entry for āassumptionā is almost perfectly symmetrical in senses). Thus, "assumption" connotes other associations than the contemporary standard sense of āthat which is assumed or taken for granted; a supposition, postulateā (only the 11th of 12 senses of āassumption,ā and the 10th of 11 senses of āassumeā) .
2344:
vast set of givens that we use to describe the surrounding environment. A model is then extended experimentally with new ideas to further strengthen or expand it. If the inclusion of a new idea appears to give benefits, such as creating more profit as in a business model, then the model stays; if not, then out it goes! Logistical accuracy is not important, only an overall benefit from the use of the model. Since a model may produce benefits at its outset, risk is an acceptable part of innovation, where, hopefully, steps take backwards are far outnumbered by steps forward. With increasing benefits come exponential increases in opportunities to develop accuracy as the model quickly gels.
2350:
to increasingly larger pieces preventing rapid construction and practical implementation in a useful time-frame. Many models are created as spaghetti structures of otherwise disconnected fact, and once implemented are difficult to modify and hence tend break with changing conditions or new conceptions. (This problem is paralleled in computer systems design, and is the strongest argument for objected-oriented approaches.) Further there is no environmental connection to the data, and hence a criteria for morality; the only criteria is that the data followed the method without respect for the environment in which the data was collected.--
2386:
hurricanes or does something else that is really neat. But that description puts everything backwards. Humans started with storms and then realized that there were storm systems. They first built "models" (assume a set of boxes filled with air, each of which is heated on a variable basis by the sun...), then got equations to describe the interactions among the part of their models, then got in trouble with the real world because it did not perform as predicted, then made alterations to the math... It wasn't that we got a set of equations by some sudden insight and later decided to make models to show non-scientists how things work.
430:
1122:
research". So in this article I can not comment directly on
Siverts text. I can only add other opinions. Your not suppose to add your own interpretation. I think my interpretation is in the text I selected. This is as far as one can go here. The funny things is that every where that you look in Knowledge you can acuse editors of beeing original or making plagiarism. And then one other thing, I am not the sole author of this article. I expect other people to work with me on this article, and generaly they do. --
42:
354:
249:
333:
228:
200:
460:
364:
2378:
his/her lab perhaps), a string, and a weight at the end. The spherical weight at the end of the string is a pretty good model for a planet. Swinging the weight around at the end of the string produces something very similar to a planetary orbit. But what, in nature, is the string? The model is helpful not only for helping us understand better what we already know from experience, but also for helping us ask further questions.
259:
1626:. In the broadest possible terms, according to this model, political movements that take hold in one country are likely to spread to geographically neighboring ones. This model is surprisingly popular, although as it stands, it is extremely impoverished conceptually, saying nothing about the type of political movement, the degree of geographical proximity, the time scale at which these events take place, etc.
33:
102:
75:
2382:
reality" but is appropriately also built on the root word meaning "to build." Models are creations of the workman in his shop. Fictions are the products of fiction writers. We are presumptuous when we make the easy assumption that because our model or our convenient fiction works we must therefore really know what is going on in the real world.
112:
2389:
When humans got into quantum physics they discovered that the models we can build based on our everyday experience of ocean waves, rifle bullets, and the other elements of our common experiential world do not do a very adequate job of describing what is really happening. The map is not the territory.
2385:
The lead of the article describes utilitarian models as we find them today, and it makes it appear that physics (and other parts of science) was here first, and models came along as an afterthought. So we have, e.g., climatology, we have equations, we have data, and then we make a model that predicts
2349:
When limited to the
Scientific Method, as most of "cold" science is, one is left adrift in a sea of facts developed (usually from funded studies or doctoral dissertations) that are usually detached and useless in of themselves. As the facts are connected, the scientific method is applied recursively
2301:
This kind of model certainly exists, and is simple in comparison to the models described in the article, yet is still scientific. It is especially useful for describing the kinds of conditions under which we all function, such in as economic or political environment. Getting people to embrace valid
2169:
Removed an incredibly bizarre (uncited) reference to sadomasochism, which read: Because "Modelling and
Simulation" is frequently taught in male dominated undergraduate environments, this field of application is deliberately named "Modelling and Simulation", rather than "Simulation and Modelling", to
1861:
because it's harsh matter-of-factual statements seems to imply that anything such as modelling is to be regarded as metaphysics and thereby unscientific/evil, since I'm a computer nerd (Nerd quota 93), it made me very angry. Of course, that's my impression, but what about other less political science
1806:
I am aware that as written, this is original thought. I was just presenting a general direction for the article and an example to illustrate. It is just the talk page. Thanks for the advice, but I am not new to wikipedia. I'll get something together and throw it up in a while and see how everyone
1753:
An example might be the electron. No one can directly observe one, and so directly demonstrate its existence. However, we can say SUPPOSE there exists a thing which we will call an electron, and SUPPOSE it has these properties. Given these properties, what behavior would I observe in X situation?
868:
Now this list was undressed for what reasons, but I restored it. This was not a see also section, where a list is given from all items in
Knowledge related to the subject. This is a lst of existing forms of scientific modelling in reality. Maybe I should have explained this better. However recently I
2381:
The essential change that occurred in
Western science starting at about the time of Kant and Hume was the realization that the model is a creation of the human mind. A related idea is that successful theories are "useful fictions." The word "fiction" not only includes the idea of "not truth" or "not
974:
Thanks. At the moment there are two references in this section. These two references indeed confirm you suggestion. The problem here is not so much, that that
Silvert is referenced, but that no more sources are referenced to. This is a problem which often occurs in Knowledge articles that are just a
2511:
In scientific modelling the method of analysis should be considered (perhaps simulated to ensure feasibility) the removed reference covers techniques of potential application in scientific modelling. In particular most models are incomplete (i.e. a grey box) and thus need completion and validation.
2338:
Models are meant be an abstraction or conceptualization of an environment solely meant to be beneficial. As such they predict behavior, and their merit usually lies in their ability to do so; they may be as large as the World's weather, or they may be as simple as a child's conceptualization of the
2309:
I am going to do some research to attempt to describe simpler modeling in psychology, for the same democratic purpose I mention above, so average people can grasp the neurological layers that influence their lives and surrounding surrounding environments, basically, to get the best from life. This
2343:
determines what is fact by linking hypothesis through proof and peer review to theory (which is fact), where any errors eliminate the hypothesis. The scientific method does not provide a pathway to knowledge construction, where the modeling approach begins with a generalized structure based on the
1831:
For you maybe this is an interesting question how scientists view models? My main questions remain, how scientists define models? What different models they encounter? How do they use them? What general properties and behavior are suggested? If you are familiar with wikipedia you maybe noticed the
1782:
Hi, thanks for your interest. This article still needs a lot of work, but I think, maybe not in directly in the way you propose here. Knowledge is not a forum to write about your own original thought. We try to collect data from reliable sources and represent them. So if you have a reliable source
678:
Would you like the UK to change its name as well, maybe "Grate
Brittane" would that make you happy as you mount your bizarre campaign against England across various pages. And to correct you - the most common form of English in use is set to become so called "Chinglish" or "Singlish", as people in
2289:
Modeling allows a generalized picture where individual components are not so important as to collapse the entire model if a few of them are misconceived. Also the only way to conceptualize a whole picture of the surrounding environment, or a whole system World view, is through modeling. This is
2285:
I began the model approach as an alternative to the scientific method when I studied education because I found that the scientific method does not work for middle and high school science students because they do not have the years necessary to invest in collecting enough data points to prove, for
1749:
Would it be appropriate to discuss how scientists generally view models as they describe the world? I have had this discussion with more than one layperson. What I mean to say is should we place more emphasis on the fact that all we work with are logical constructs, and the degree to which they
1602:
Type
Indicator is a technique that claims to produce a representation of a person's preferences, using four scales. These scales can be combined in various ways to produce 16 personality types. Types are typically denoted by four letters ā for example, INTJ (introverted intuition with extroverted
2416:
I really liked the following description in the overview that is as well copied in the article of "conceptual models": "Attempts to formalize the principles of the empirical sciences, use an interpretation to model reality, in the same way logicians axiomatize the principles of logic. The aim of
2377:
The world often presents humans with situations that prompt us to make models. For instance, scientists discover that planets circle the sun. They ask themselves why the orbits are circular. They make a (mental or physical) model in which there is an anchor at the center (a physicist standing in
2373:
In the West, many thinkers began with the assumption that humans see simply and directly what is going on. Unconsciously, early science was often based on analogies to human behavior. Humans go up trees because they want to (to get fruit, for instance). But smoke does not really go up because it
1121:
Second there is a very funny situation here, when you compare this situations to the standards for an article in a scientific journal. For these articles it is important to be original and to present your opinions based on your own original resource. Now the key rule in
Knowledge is "no original
927:
indicates the subsequent activities of (i) translating a substantive research problem into the specification of a class of statistical models (the model space M), (ii) selecting the most relevant subset S C M of statistical models (statistical modelling), and (iii) Interpreting S in terms of the
633:
I think you'll find most native
English speakers, i.e., those in the U.S., would use one l - modeling, modeler, etc., while the minority of English speakers, i.e., those who speak "UK" English, would use the double l. Since this is Wiki, no doubt the double l crowd will win as they seem far more
1007:
But as I stated before, this article is still in a premature state. And I am going to work on that. Last but not least. I don't know if one could call this situation a type of plagiarism in the first place, because the source is clearly mentioned, the text is clearly rewritten, and it is only a
707:
Modelling is the British spelling, Modeling is the American spelling. The main problem is inconsistency - I have changed everything to Modelling, only because the current title sais "modelling". If Knowledge endorses either type of spelling system, things should be changed accordingly, but in a
2111:
Most bakeries work on a suboptimal level concerning utilization of devices, energy consumption and staff allocation. That results in ābottle-necksā, operation problems, and not achieving the best possible profits. In order to detect these suboptimal processes, it is advantageous to use virtual
1757:
In my dealings with scientists, I've found that in general dealings, they apply a positivist view toward a lot of models (now I'm talking about ones that are generally agreed to be much more abstract than the electron example) such as electromagnetic fields. It is just simpler in day-to-day
542:
You are right. This problem started 2.5 years ago, when User:Nobbie on 21 January 2006 moved the article "Scientific modeling" to "Scientific modelling" claiming more neutral spelling (both BrE and AmE). Now I don't know what is right or wrong. I do think this inconsistency isn;t right. --
2012:
In general I have found it hard to find reliable sources with a more general scope on this matter. I doubt you can speak of a Modeling Domain in science. The insights seems to be scattered all around. I must say I am impressed lately by the advanced insights in modeling in the field of
951:
Plagiarism!? At least in the "Overview" section, most of the text seems lifted directly by the paper "Modelling as a Discipline" by Silvert (2000). However, a citation only comes at the end of the section. No time to fix, but if anyone's able, it's on the to-do list. (April 11 2007)
2417:
these attempts is to construct a formal system that will not produce theoretical consequences that are contrary to what is found in reality. Predictions or other statements drawn from such a formal system mirror or map the real world only insofar as these scientific models are true."
2026:
I think it would be nice to even have articles about "Modeling in Systems Engineering" and "Modeling in Software Engineering". And some outline of the field, as you suggested earlier. If you have some concrete things you want to change in teh article, I would say, just go ahead. --
1836:
has been eliminated. There is still, I think, very little general information about Scientific modelling or modelling in science, on wikipedia. The most simple questions haven't been answered yet. And why not? Maybe these simple questions are the most difficult to answer..!? --
1754:
Then you set up the situation and compare measured and predicted results. After a while, we have developed a model of an electron that correlates with experiment so well that it is assumed that our model is a description of actual reality (I think this is a positivist view).
900:
Now as I said, I'm in the process of writting a section about every type of modelling. If you state that several types have little or nothing to do with scientific modelling, I am very interested. Above is a list of 24 types. Could you tell me which types you mean and why? -
2112:
models. Once created, these models behave like the real system. Thus, they will provide a very detailed look on the production flows, and a powerful tool for production planning, which helps to find and eliminate inefficient production schemes and ābottle-necksā.<ref: -->
897:, and it doesn't forbit what I did. And you are trying to turns things around here. This is a list of forms of scientific modelling... which I originally extracted from reality. I used the piped link to show, what Knowledge has to offer about every type of modelling.
1825:
Ok. This was just my respons. Indeed this is a talkpage and you have asked the question: "Would it be appropriate to discuss how scientists generally view models as they describe the world?" Now I wonder if there is any study and publication about this subject at
2339:
world on the walk to school. Modeling is fundamentally different from the Scientific Method in that a model is a whole systems view where individual components are not so important as to collapse the entire model if a few of them are misconceived. Conversely the
1967:
Review the paragraph related to the statement that "modeling is a substitute of direct measurement". I suggest some careful re-wording, as modeling in natural science usually leads to (and is validated by) direct measurements (of some phenomena, predicted by the
1953:
activity. I would expect a clear answer to the question on "What are different forms of scientific knowledge?", wheather a 'model' is one of them, and what are other forms of scientific knowledge, that are not models. I do believe, that such subsection is very
930:
If this would be incorporated in the page there would also be room to speak about things as Model Search, Fitting of a model, the EH algorithm, etc. Or do you think all this belongs somewhere else? Please excuse any beginner mistakes, I'm new to wikipedia.
1957:
Address the "When?" question, by providing a subsection on the History of modeling, in the form of the essential timelines, to follow up on the statement that 'Modelling is a comparatively new area of activity involving the marriage of ideas from various
2508:āSee alsoā āGrey box completion and validationā has been removed from this and several other topics. Following advice from Knowledge if there are no objections (please provide your name and reasons), I plan to reinstate the reference in a weeks time.
1758:
operations. However, if you try to pin a guy down, they generally start to squirm and acknowledge that they only accept the description for its ability to predict behavior, and won't go so far as to say that it is an actual explanation of reality.
1603:
thinking) ā to represent a person's preferences. This model is claimed by CPP (formerly known as Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.) to produce a good predictor of a person's career and marriage partner preference. It should be pointed out, see
2002:
Thanks. I agree this article can use a lot of improvement. I idea of further improvement has been to write a short introduction of every type of modelling mentioned in the "Types of scientific modelling" section, but have come to that
883:. The purpose of piped links is NOT to provide uniformity in a list. It is to allow an in-text link to fit grammatically into the sentence. The article include several that have little or nothing to do with scientific modelling.
996:"..most of the text seems lifted directly by the paper...". The text is available on line an anyone can check that this text is no directly lifted, but rewritten into the general introduction that fits this Knowledge context.
1911:
Marcel, and all: Here are some thoughts on this article. There was a question, if this article provides an overview of the modeling domain. I believe, the article provides a good overview, and could be further improved.
1288:
853:
This list represents the titles of some 40 magazines about scientific modelling which offer all kinds of international forums. And every item in this list has an link to the place were more information can be found. -
573:
ing". However, many of the hits for the former are related to being a model (as in a fashion model), while pretty much all the hits for the latter are related to scientific modeling. So based on that, at least,
2436:
The reference to the source was rather incomplete, and I made a correction here. Now the text here is no citation, otherwise the text would be put in quotation marks. This source is only used as a reference. --
2191:
This article or section appears to have been copied and pasted from various Knowledge articles, possibly in violation of a copyright. This has occurred last year, May 11-13 2008, when I expanded this article.
658:
p.s. it's interesting that today "modeling" with google generates about 300 million hits vs. only about 30 milllion for "modelling" - at least in non-Wiki use, U.S. English would appear to be gaining ground.
1761:
I think it is important because this clarifies the role of modelling, and helps non-scientists understand how we can go from the plum-pudding model to the bohr model to more sophisticated models of atoms.
1679:
I'm a writer, not a scientist, and I came here to answer a simple question: what's the difference between a scientific model and a scientific theory? I searched the relevant pages and I still don't know.
1117:
And further. First I don't understand the plagiarism claim. I still think this only applies to situations where the author claims to have written the whole text himselve and doesn't mention the sources he
2685:
925:
Maybe methodological moddeling should be added as well. Not necessarily by that term, but something like this is missing. Definition of Methodological modelling by Ader, Mellenbergh and Hand (2008):
2390:
Humans create maps. Humans know the territory by means of maps. Tangential experiences of the territory force humans to modify their maps, but the distinction between map and thing mapped remains.
1676:
That's as bad as the worst gobbledygook I've seen come out of marketing departments, law firms, and the government. Writing like that is unworthy of Knowledge and (especially) of the sciences.
2306:
may say), so this simplified kind of modeling may potentially be more influential than highly complex modeling, especially since the scientific modelers have been failing miserably of late.
2170:
avoid distractions which may arise due to any possible association with the negative connotations of S&M.. This adds nothing to the substance of the article, and is unsubstantiated.
1567:
1494:
1294:
Note this model assumes that the particle is a point mass, which is certainly known to be false in many cases where we use the model, e.g. when we use it as a model of planetary motion.
2113:
Hussein, Walid Barakat; Hecker, Florian; Mitzscherling, Martin; and Becker, Thomas (2009), '''', in: International Journal of Food Engineering: Vol. 5Ā : Iss. 2, Article 8.</ref: -->
1644:
These examples aren't even examples of genaral types of scientific models, but a random list of some specific types of models. Knowledge offers articles about hunderds of those items.
2710:
2675:
2422:
However, I checked the original reference and a "more acutal one" of 1961 and I really did not find this citation or even some fragments! Please give the correct reference!!! --
2477:
The term "assumption" is actually broader than its standard use, etymologically speaking. The Oxford English Dictionary (OED) and online Wiktionary indicate its Latin source as
2310:
relates to the constructivist "community of knowledge," but from a more emotional approach where emotion is a kind of exceedingly complex interactive information, or knowledge.
1673:"Attempts to formalize the principles of the empirical sciences in the same way logicians axiomatize the principles of logic use a descriptive interpretation to model reality."
2755:
2750:
2690:
527:
ing". I think this should be consistent. As far as I know this is a discrepancy between American/British English? Are there any Knowledge guidelines on this sort of situation?
1750:
predict the behavior of a system determine their usefulness, but quantifying the behavior of a system does not necessarily imply that you have actually explained the system.
2715:
2068:
page... And as far as I know (but I'm not a native speaker) both modelling could be writen with one and two "l"... It's confusing... Do somebody have I idea to solve itĀ ?
46:
2740:
438:
133:
on Knowledge. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
2705:
2700:
2313:
From this research I may be able to provide support for inclusion of simpler education-based and more "pedestrian" scientific modeling into the article.--
1934:
It addresses the "Why?" question (relating modeling and simulation; describing model as an complementary method for direct measurement and experimentation)
170:
160:
2370:
I think that the article can be improved by showing the reader where and why the act of making a model stands in relation to the creation of a theory.
1106:
Thanks, I made two more references to Silvert in the introduction. If you don't agree, please refraise the text as you think is right. And two things:
2725:
2670:
305:
2735:
420:
410:
315:
207:
85:
2680:
1109:
This article is still in a premature state. There is a need for a lot more general introduction and specific text about general modelling topics.
1196:
915:
I started adding some google rates at the types of scientific modelling, which gives a first indication about how notable these subjects are. -
723:
The next list is in a recent change rather ("vernaggeld") made invisable (some google-rates have been added, with term written with "l"//"ll"):
2745:
2569:
135:
2512:
This reference seems to be within the appropriate content of the āSee alsoā section see Knowledge:Manual_of_Style/Layout#See_also_section.
2695:
1008:
general introduction of known knowledge. Not some bright original ideas which are completely copied here. In Knowledge we have rules about
959:
1765:
I may just start adding content, and if anyone has a problem, they can just edit or revert, though I would appreciate some collaberation
2464:
686:
2119:
This is about one very specific application of computer simulation, and hardly related to applying scientific modelling in general. --
679:
China and the Far East adapt the language to use as their common second tongue - so get your facts right before your stupid comments.
2423:
2197:
2147:
281:
2463:
because it is off topic and interrupts the flow of the article. I suggest he/she posts it elsewhere, as it's still very interesting.
2730:
2720:
2256:
2090:
1687:
993:
Although you do have a point, I want to respond to question if here there is a case of plagiarism. I have a few things in response.
2549:, with its picture. It just looks like and advertisement for BlendSpace (see the picture). Let's discuss the need for this part. --
2286:
instance, a weather hypothesis. Invariably their findings were wrong. (As it happens, the weather models don't do much better!)
125:
80:
2665:
1581:
to levels of satisfaction is a source of criticism. But this is not an essential ingredient of the theory and again, the model
1044:
I am really happy that someone took the time to write an entry about modeling and collecting links to other resources. I think
2303:
1027:
999:
A lot of similarities remain because both texts have the same purpose to give a general introduction on scientific modelling.
596:
It is an interesting point of view, and made me wonder. So I just did some checking myself in books.google.nl. This gave me:
1964:
The list of the key concepts related to modeling includes 'structure'. I suggest, that the concept 'behavior' is also added.
1961:
Address the "Who?" question by providing the link to the key persons who have contributes to the development of this domain.
1068:
In such a situation it is a good idea to read the text to be cited, to close the book, and then write it up. This makes sure
2374:
wants to. Saying, "Smoke goes upward because that is what it wants/needs to do," models smoke behavior on human behavior.
2652:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2201:. If you would like to assist in improving this article, please let me know. I can use all the help I can get. Thank you.
2151:. If you would like to assist in improving this article, please let me know. I can use all the help I can get. Thank you.
1071:
that it is at the same time really a summary of the thoughts of someone else and something totally new. Also, the citation
1056:
rearrange the order or exchange some words. In a thesis, this would lead to an immediate rejection and severe accusations.
1053:
on this together with the Journal where he published it. It is definitely not enough by any scientif standards to slightly
1047:
MDD has done a good job on this and it has helped me. Nonetheless, I agree that this is a case of quite severe plagiarism,
377:
338:
272:
233:
807:
797:
55:
2290:
necessary to keep the more conceptual students interested enough to want to be scientists. I write about that on the
1990:
497:
1606:, that there is considerable disagreement among psychologists on whether this assessment technique (and the implied
1112:
Now the whole idea of Knowledge is to create articles based on reliable sources. We are supposed to use the sources.
869:
started transforming this listing into text.. and I have got any further yet. I hope I have explained my actions. -
2229:
2177:
1937:
It addresses the "How?" question by providing links to different types of models and steps of the modeling process
1505:
1431:
1420:). The problem of rational behavior in this model then becomes one of constrained maximization, that is maximize
1077:
makes it clearer that the following is based on the genuine ideas of somebody else. And yes, the formulation of a
802:
745:
501:
2573:
1343:(cardinal in the sense that it assigns numerical values to utilities), depending on the amounts of commodities
1031:
963:
2291:
2468:
2402:
690:
2086:
1691:
1986:
1974:
There is a section on Business Process Modeling, but it needs to be compelmented with (and contrasted to)
1085:
1009:
936:
787:
369:
1002:
I have selected this particulair text out of the dozends of books and articles I read about this subject.
2554:
2173:
767:
61:
1719:
932:
2082:
429:
2620:
2588:
2584:
2531:
2527:
2517:
2513:
2355:
2318:
2078:
2065:
2014:
1812:
1772:
1683:
955:
894:
880:
682:
2017:. But the insights here focus mainly on the modeling of aspects of the software development process.
1573:
This model has been used in model of general equilibrium theory, particularly to show existence and
528:
32:
1074:
at the beginning of the introdution (and not at the end as a mere 'find further information here'!)
812:
579:
532:
505:
496:
is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
280:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2638:
2398:
1858:
1173:
given its coordinates in space as a function of time. The potential field is given by a function
842:
832:
762:
583:
2298:, where I also cover concept mapping (which may not be as valuable as originally advertised).
2240:
2139:
1574:
1081:
822:
117:
1670:
This is the worst written Knowledge page I've ever seen. Look at this sentence, for example:
2630:
1893:
1871:
1833:
1731:
664:
639:
561:
I came to this page to answer that very question. Merriam-Webster seems to accept either.
459:
613:
Especially the last two number of hits seems remarkable. Both terms seems equal in use. --
2351:
2314:
1808:
1768:
1012:. I will look into this some more. And I will rewrite the introduction some more sone. --
847:
757:
472:
468:
386:
2623:
that would make a good fit for this page. It could be described in context here, and the
2071:
Thank's in advance, and thank's to wikipedia contributors which make it so efficient...
1783:
and text about "how scientists generally view models" then it is ok to write about this.
353:
332:
248:
227:
2460:
2061:
733:
264:
562:
199:
2659:
2634:
2550:
2442:
2340:
2268:
2209:
2159:
2124:
2032:
1971:
Some minor wordsmith-ing can improve the article, there are plenty suggestions above.
1842:
1793:
1707:
1656:
1623:
1127:
1017:
980:
884:
751:
727:
618:
548:
17:
1577:
of economic equilibria. However, the fact that this particular formulation assigns
1065:
and then just summarize his points on a more abstract level without using his words.
2295:
1599:
1593:
817:
782:
258:
1647:
The article itselve gives a list of the more general types of scientific modelling
1888:
1866:
1726:
1702:
Sorry to hear. I agree that one sentence doesn't make much sence to me also. --
772:
660:
635:
2642:
2577:
2558:
2535:
2521:
2472:
2446:
2427:
2406:
2359:
2322:
2272:
2213:
2181:
2163:
2128:
2094:
2036:
1994:
1900:
1878:
1846:
1816:
1797:
1776:
1738:
1711:
1695:
1660:
1131:
1089:
1021:
984:
967:
940:
919:
905:
887:
873:
858:
694:
668:
643:
622:
587:
552:
536:
2619:
There is a short bu reliably sourced article on the theory of modelling under
2244:
1950:
837:
827:
359:
254:
130:
107:
2248:
2053:
1946:
777:
1283:{\displaystyle m{\frac {d^{2}}{dt^{2}}}x(t)=-\operatorname {grad} V(x(t)).}
2438:
2264:
2205:
2155:
2120:
2057:
2028:
1838:
1789:
1703:
1652:
1123:
1050:
especially as MDD does not seem to be William Silvert who owns the rights
1013:
976:
916:
902:
870:
855:
792:
614:
544:
2481:("accept, to take to oneself, adopt, usurp"), which is a conjunction of
1857:
Intuitively (not a citable source), I got a real hard problem accepting
739:
277:
129:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
2302:
concepts is necessary for a functioning democracy (despite what many
2252:
1059:
The easiest thing to do is the following: start the introduction with
382:
2489:(to take). The root survives, with shifted meanings, in the Italian
1366:
consumed. The model further assumes that the consumer has a budget
101:
74:
1949:. We are saying that is an essential and inseparable part of all
1907:
Scientific Modeling article as an overview of the Modeling Domain
1604:
2060:
on the english wikipedia... If I type, "Modelling" I get on the
1622:. Some versions of this model are sometimes referred to as the
1157:. In this model we consider a particle as being a point of mass
2195:
I apologize for all inconvenience I have caused here, see also
2145:
I apologize for all inconvenience I have caused here, see also
2142:, I have removed one or more section of this article for now.
1919:
defining Scientific Modeling as the process of creating Models;
454:
26:
2393:
I'll see whether I can still find my copy of Philipp Frank's
1185:
and the trajectory is a solution of the differential equation
428:
198:
2281:
Whole systems approach to everyday life and for education
1080:
text is the author's 'bright and original' contribution.
2397:
It should be a good source for evidence on these points.
1788:
So if you want to add content, use reliable sources. --
1304:. In this model we assume a consumer faces a choice of
2236:
2225:
1641:
No of these items are examples of scientific modelling.
1980:
Modeling in Software Engineering needs to be addressed
1945:
I suggest providing a stronger link to the concept of
2686:
Knowledge level-4 vital articles in Physical sciences
1508:
1434:
1199:
2604:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
276:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1161:that describes a trajectory modelled by a function
563:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/modelling
181:
1561:
1488:
1282:
2187:Copied and pasted from various Knowledge articles
2064:page... but if I type "Modeling", I get into the
1941:Here are few suggestions to improve the article:
1062:"Following Silvert (citation), modeling is ... "
1922:defining Model as a certain representation of
2711:Low-importance philosophy of science articles
2676:Knowledge vital articles in Physical sciences
2607:A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
2545:I don't understand the need for this section
634:insistent that their's is the "correct" way.
8:
2138:Due to possible violation of copyright, see
1924:a system of entities, phenomena or processes
1562:{\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^{n}p_{i}x_{i}=M.}
1489:{\displaystyle U(x_{1},x_{2},\ldots ,x_{n})}
911:The listing of types of scientific modelling
381:, which collaborates on articles related to
2756:Knowledge articles that use British English
2751:Knowledge articles that use Oxford spelling
2691:C-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
975:beginning. I will try to fix this soon. --
1155:Model of a particle: in a potential field
327:
222:
178:
69:
2716:Philosophy of science task force articles
1929:providing several key related definitions
1853:Compatibility with Philosophy of science?
1544:
1534:
1524:
1513:
1507:
1477:
1458:
1445:
1433:
1302:Model of rational behavior for a consumer
1223:
1209:
1203:
1198:
2741:Systems articles in scientific modeling
2526:Reference reinstated SolidPhase thanks
719:A list of types of Scientific modelling
329:
224:
71:
30:
2706:C-Class philosophy of science articles
2106:I removed the follwoing section here:
139:about philosophy content on Knowledge.
2504:Re Grey box completion and validation
2459:I removed the following paragraph by
1916:It addresses the "What?" question by
504:, this should not be changed without
7:
2598:The following discussion is closed.
2102:Modelling and Simulation of Bakeries
1637:These examples are removed because:
1370:which she uses to purchase a vector
1335:. The consumer is assumed to have a
437:This article is within the field of
375:This article is within the scope of
270:This article is within the scope of
123:This article is within the scope of
1977:Modeling in Systems Engineering and
1832:recently the general article about
1610:personality model) is of any value.
60:It is of interest to the following
2701:Low-importance Philosophy articles
2341:scientific method (from Aristotle)
1148:I removed the folowing examples.
25:
2547:Model-based learning in education
2257:Visualization (computer graphics)
565:. Google has 100M hits for "mode
2726:High-importance science articles
2671:Knowledge level-4 vital articles
2648:The discussion above is closed.
608:614 about "scientific modelling"
569:ing" and only 40M hits for "mode
458:
362:
352:
331:
257:
247:
226:
145:Knowledge:WikiProject Philosophy
110:
100:
73:
40:
31:
2736:Top-importance Systems articles
1718:Then you haven't read the page
808:Modelling of scientific inquiry
415:This article has been rated as
310:This article has been rated as
165:This article has been rated as
148:Template:WikiProject Philosophy
2681:C-Class level-4 vital articles
2412:Freudenthal reference wrong???
1483:
1438:
1274:
1271:
1265:
1259:
1241:
1235:
1028:Knowledge:Copyright violations
893:I have read every word of the
605:648 over "scientific modeling"
1:
2578:17:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
2559:14:57, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
2095:00:54, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
1884:I forgot "cruel statements".
1393:in such a way as to maximize
1308:commodities labelled 1,2,...,
395:Knowledge:WikiProject Systems
290:Knowledge:WikiProject Science
284:and see a list of open tasks.
2746:WikiProject Systems articles
2643:14:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
2473:06:52, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
2273:20:05, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
2239:text is copy/paste from the
2228:text is copy/paste from the
2214:23:09, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
2164:23:07, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
2037:22:36, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
1995:17:31, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
1620:Model of political contagion
941:22:28, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
695:17:12, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
523:ing", the article says "mode
398:Template:WikiProject Systems
293:Template:WikiProject Science
2696:C-Class Philosophy articles
2230:Business process modelling
920:13:37, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
906:18:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
888:15:27, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
874:14:12, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
859:14:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
2772:
2536:05:32, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
2366:Models and useful fictions
2360:16:45, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
2323:00:57, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
2182:00:25, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
2134:Article section(s) removed
1022:14:11, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
985:10:11, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
968:02:32, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
421:project's importance scale
316:project's importance scale
171:project's importance scale
2541:BlendSpace advertisement?
2522:09:23, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
2455:Etymology of "assumption"
2447:16:13, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
2428:12:16, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
1901:12:15, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
1879:12:13, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
1847:18:22, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
1817:17:29, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
1798:13:42, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
1777:13:22, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
1739:12:07, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
1722:that I'm trying to kill.
1712:12:11, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
1696:05:18, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
1312:each with a market price
1132:15:38, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
1090:14:11, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
864:The original listing back
803:Modelling in Epidemiology
783:Hydrogeological modelling
669:21:00, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
644:20:56, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
623:18:23, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
588:16:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
553:22:10, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
537:14:07, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
436:
414:
347:
309:
242:
206:
177:
164:
95:
68:
2731:C-Class Systems articles
2721:C-Class science articles
2650:Please do not modify it.
2601:Please do not modify it.
2485:("to, towards, at") and
2407:22:24, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
2129:21:50, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
1745:Interpretation of models
1661:15:19, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
1032:Knowledge:Citing sources
895:Knowledge:Piped link#Use
881:Knowledge:Piped link#Use
798:Meteorological modelling
773:Hydrographical modelling
2633:would be a better fit.
2629:Actually, I think that
2333:Tell me what you think:
2219:Copy-paste registration
2052:THere is a problem for
578:ing" seems preferred.
182:Associated task forces:
2666:C-Class vital articles
2611:Withdrawn by nominator
2395:Philosophy of Science.
2328:Some introductory text
1563:
1529:
1490:
1284:
1010:copyright infringement
843:Stochastical modelling
788:Mathematical modelling
778:Hydrological modelling
736:- 1.650.000 // 636.000
519:The heading says "mode
433:
370:Systems science portal
203:
126:WikiProject Philosophy
1564:
1509:
1491:
1285:
838:Statistical modelling
602:7.700 about modelling
599:11.669 about modeling
432:
208:Philosophy of science
202:
47:level-4 vital article
18:Talk:Model (abstract)
2621:General model theory
2589:Scientific modelling
2585:General model theory
2066:Scientific modelling
2015:software engineering
1506:
1432:
1197:
754:- 424.000 // 310.000
748:- 365.000 // 493.000
746:Economical modelling
742:- 183.000 // 543.000
740:Ecological modelling
730:- 424.000 // 301.000
502:relevant style guide
498:varieties of English
2206:Marcel Douwe Dekker
2156:Marcel Douwe Dekker
2121:Marcel Douwe Dekker
2029:Marcel Douwe Dekker
1839:Marcel Douwe Dekker
1790:Marcel Douwe Dekker
1704:Marcel Douwe Dekker
1653:Marcel Douwe Dekker
1124:Marcel Douwe Dekker
813:Molecular modelling
768:Graphical modelling
615:Marcel Douwe Dekker
545:Marcel Douwe Dekker
500:. According to the
439:Scientific modeling
378:WikiProjectĀ Systems
273:WikiProject Science
151:Philosophy articles
2045:Modelling/Modeling
1859:Logical positivism
1559:
1486:
1280:
833:Software modelling
763:Geologic modelling
708:consistent manner.
434:
204:
136:general discussion
56:content assessment
2424:User:153.96.224.2
2241:Scientific method
2098:
2081:comment added by
1987:Equilibrioception
1720:Atmospheric beast
1698:
1686:comment added by
1575:Pareto optimality
1339:utility function
1230:
970:
958:comment added by
928:research problem.
793:Medical modelling
752:Climate modelling
728:Climate modelling
685:comment added by
512:
511:
453:
452:
449:
448:
445:
444:
326:
325:
322:
321:
221:
220:
217:
216:
213:
212:
118:Philosophy portal
16:(Redirected from
2763:
2631:Conceptual model
2625:
2624:
2603:
2174:RealityApologist
2097:
2075:
1898:
1896:
1891:
1876:
1874:
1869:
1834:model (abstract)
1807:feels about it.
1736:
1734:
1729:
1681:
1596:personality type
1585:an idealization.
1579:numerical values
1568:
1566:
1565:
1560:
1549:
1548:
1539:
1538:
1528:
1523:
1495:
1493:
1492:
1487:
1482:
1481:
1463:
1462:
1450:
1449:
1289:
1287:
1286:
1281:
1231:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1214:
1213:
1204:
1144:Examples removed
953:
823:Policy modelling
697:
465:This article is
462:
455:
403:
402:
401:Systems articles
399:
396:
393:
372:
367:
366:
365:
356:
349:
348:
343:
335:
328:
298:
297:
296:science articles
294:
291:
288:
267:
262:
261:
251:
244:
243:
238:
230:
223:
189:
179:
153:
152:
149:
146:
143:
120:
115:
114:
113:
104:
97:
96:
91:
88:
77:
70:
53:
44:
43:
36:
35:
27:
21:
2771:
2770:
2766:
2765:
2764:
2762:
2761:
2760:
2656:
2655:
2654:
2653:
2617:
2599:
2592:
2570:119.152.159.130
2566:
2543:
2506:
2457:
2414:
2368:
2330:
2283:
2221:
2189:
2136:
2104:
2076:
2047:
1909:
1894:
1889:
1886:
1872:
1867:
1864:
1855:
1747:
1732:
1727:
1724:
1668:
1635:
1633:Further comment
1540:
1530:
1504:
1503:
1473:
1454:
1441:
1430:
1429:
1419:
1410:
1403:
1392:
1383:
1376:
1365:
1356:
1349:
1334:
1325:
1318:
1219:
1215:
1205:
1195:
1194:
1146:
949:
913:
866:
848:System dynamics
818:Ocean modelling
758:Futures studies
721:
680:
517:
506:broad consensus
473:Oxford spelling
469:British English
400:
397:
394:
391:
390:
387:systems science
368:
363:
361:
341:
312:High-importance
295:
292:
289:
286:
285:
263:
256:
237:Highāimportance
236:
187:
150:
147:
144:
141:
140:
116:
111:
109:
89:
83:
54:on Knowledge's
51:
41:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
2769:
2767:
2759:
2758:
2753:
2748:
2743:
2738:
2733:
2728:
2723:
2718:
2713:
2708:
2703:
2698:
2693:
2688:
2683:
2678:
2673:
2668:
2658:
2657:
2647:
2646:
2645:
2616:
2615:
2614:
2613:
2612:
2594:
2593:
2591:
2581:
2565:
2562:
2542:
2539:
2505:
2502:
2461:User:Wingroras
2456:
2453:
2452:
2451:
2450:
2449:
2431:
2430:
2413:
2410:
2367:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2346:
2345:
2329:
2326:
2282:
2279:
2277:
2261:
2260:
2233:
2220:
2217:
2188:
2185:
2168:
2135:
2132:
2117:
2116:
2103:
2100:
2062:Model (person)
2046:
2043:
2042:
2041:
2040:
2039:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2018:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2004:
1984:
1983:
1982:
1981:
1978:
1972:
1969:
1965:
1962:
1959:
1955:
1939:
1938:
1935:
1932:
1931:
1930:
1927:
1920:
1908:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1862:philosophies?
1854:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1828:
1827:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1801:
1800:
1785:
1784:
1746:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1715:
1714:
1667:
1664:
1649:
1648:
1645:
1642:
1634:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1587:
1586:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1558:
1555:
1552:
1547:
1543:
1537:
1533:
1527:
1522:
1519:
1516:
1512:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1485:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1469:
1466:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1437:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1415:
1408:
1401:
1388:
1381:
1374:
1361:
1354:
1347:
1330:
1323:
1316:
1296:
1295:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1279:
1276:
1273:
1270:
1267:
1264:
1261:
1258:
1255:
1252:
1249:
1246:
1243:
1240:
1237:
1234:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1212:
1208:
1202:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1145:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1119:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1110:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1078:
1075:
1072:
1069:
1066:
1063:
1060:
1057:
1054:
1051:
1048:
1045:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1026:P.S. See also
1024:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1000:
997:
988:
987:
960:142.244.164.13
948:
945:
944:
943:
912:
909:
891:
890:
865:
862:
851:
850:
845:
840:
835:
830:
825:
820:
815:
810:
805:
800:
795:
790:
785:
780:
775:
770:
765:
760:
755:
749:
743:
737:
734:Data modelling
731:
720:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
712:
711:
710:
709:
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
626:
625:
611:
610:
609:
606:
603:
600:
593:
592:
591:
590:
556:
555:
516:
513:
510:
509:
463:
451:
450:
447:
446:
443:
442:
435:
425:
424:
417:Top-importance
413:
407:
406:
404:
374:
373:
357:
345:
344:
342:Topāimportance
336:
324:
323:
320:
319:
308:
302:
301:
299:
282:the discussion
269:
268:
265:Science portal
252:
240:
239:
231:
219:
218:
215:
214:
211:
210:
205:
195:
194:
192:
190:
184:
183:
175:
174:
167:Low-importance
163:
157:
156:
154:
122:
121:
105:
93:
92:
90:Lowāimportance
78:
66:
65:
59:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2768:
2757:
2754:
2752:
2749:
2747:
2744:
2742:
2739:
2737:
2734:
2732:
2729:
2727:
2724:
2722:
2719:
2717:
2714:
2712:
2709:
2707:
2704:
2702:
2699:
2697:
2694:
2692:
2689:
2687:
2684:
2682:
2679:
2677:
2674:
2672:
2669:
2667:
2664:
2663:
2661:
2651:
2644:
2640:
2636:
2632:
2628:
2627:
2626:
2622:
2610:
2609:
2608:
2605:
2602:
2596:
2595:
2590:
2586:
2582:
2580:
2579:
2575:
2571:
2563:
2561:
2560:
2556:
2552:
2548:
2540:
2538:
2537:
2533:
2529:
2524:
2523:
2519:
2515:
2509:
2503:
2501:
2498:
2496:
2492:
2488:
2484:
2480:
2475:
2474:
2470:
2466:
2465:87.240.204.48
2462:
2454:
2448:
2444:
2440:
2435:
2434:
2433:
2432:
2429:
2425:
2420:
2419:
2418:
2411:
2409:
2408:
2404:
2400:
2396:
2391:
2387:
2383:
2379:
2375:
2371:
2365:
2361:
2357:
2353:
2348:
2347:
2342:
2337:
2336:
2335:
2334:
2327:
2325:
2324:
2320:
2316:
2311:
2307:
2305:
2299:
2297:
2293:
2287:
2280:
2278:
2275:
2274:
2270:
2266:
2258:
2254:
2250:
2246:
2242:
2238:
2234:
2231:
2227:
2223:
2222:
2218:
2216:
2215:
2211:
2207:
2202:
2200:
2199:
2193:
2186:
2184:
2183:
2179:
2175:
2171:
2166:
2165:
2161:
2157:
2152:
2150:
2149:
2143:
2141:
2133:
2131:
2130:
2126:
2122:
2115:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2101:
2099:
2096:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2072:
2069:
2067:
2063:
2059:
2055:
2050:
2044:
2038:
2034:
2030:
2025:
2024:
2023:
2022:
2016:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1979:
1976:
1975:
1973:
1970:
1966:
1963:
1960:
1956:
1952:
1948:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1936:
1933:
1928:
1925:
1921:
1918:
1917:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1906:
1902:
1899:
1897:
1892:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1877:
1875:
1870:
1860:
1852:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1835:
1830:
1829:
1824:
1823:
1818:
1814:
1810:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1799:
1795:
1791:
1787:
1786:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1774:
1770:
1766:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1751:
1744:
1740:
1737:
1735:
1730:
1721:
1717:
1716:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1697:
1693:
1689:
1685:
1677:
1674:
1671:
1665:
1663:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1646:
1643:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1632:
1625:
1624:domino theory
1621:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1597:
1595:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1584:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1556:
1553:
1550:
1545:
1541:
1535:
1531:
1525:
1520:
1517:
1514:
1510:
1502:
1501:
1499:
1478:
1474:
1470:
1467:
1464:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1446:
1442:
1435:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1418:
1414:
1407:
1400:
1396:
1391:
1387:
1380:
1373:
1369:
1364:
1360:
1353:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1333:
1329:
1322:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1293:
1277:
1268:
1262:
1256:
1253:
1250:
1247:
1244:
1238:
1232:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1210:
1206:
1200:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1143:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1120:
1116:
1111:
1108:
1107:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1076:
1073:
1070:
1067:
1064:
1061:
1058:
1055:
1052:
1049:
1046:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1006:
1001:
998:
995:
994:
992:
991:
990:
989:
986:
982:
978:
973:
972:
971:
969:
965:
961:
957:
946:
942:
938:
934:
929:
924:
923:
922:
921:
918:
910:
908:
907:
904:
898:
896:
889:
886:
882:
878:
877:
876:
875:
872:
863:
861:
860:
857:
849:
846:
844:
841:
839:
836:
834:
831:
829:
826:
824:
821:
819:
816:
814:
811:
809:
806:
804:
801:
799:
796:
794:
791:
789:
786:
784:
781:
779:
776:
774:
771:
769:
766:
764:
761:
759:
756:
753:
750:
747:
744:
741:
738:
735:
732:
729:
726:
725:
724:
718:
706:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
696:
692:
688:
687:90.195.241.99
684:
670:
666:
662:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
645:
641:
637:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
624:
620:
616:
612:
607:
604:
601:
598:
597:
595:
594:
589:
585:
581:
577:
572:
568:
564:
560:
559:
558:
557:
554:
550:
546:
541:
540:
539:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
514:
507:
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
474:
470:
464:
461:
457:
456:
440:
431:
427:
426:
422:
418:
412:
409:
408:
405:
388:
384:
380:
379:
371:
360:
358:
355:
351:
350:
346:
340:
337:
334:
330:
317:
313:
307:
304:
303:
300:
283:
279:
275:
274:
266:
260:
255:
253:
250:
246:
245:
241:
235:
232:
229:
225:
209:
201:
197:
196:
193:
191:
186:
185:
180:
176:
172:
168:
162:
159:
158:
155:
138:
137:
132:
128:
127:
119:
108:
106:
103:
99:
98:
94:
87:
82:
79:
76:
72:
67:
63:
57:
49:
48:
38:
34:
29:
28:
19:
2649:
2618:
2606:
2600:
2597:
2567:
2546:
2544:
2525:
2510:
2507:
2499:
2494:
2493:and Spanish
2490:
2486:
2482:
2478:
2476:
2458:
2415:
2394:
2392:
2388:
2384:
2380:
2376:
2372:
2369:
2332:
2331:
2312:
2308:
2300:
2288:
2284:
2276:
2262:
2203:
2196:
2194:
2190:
2172:
2167:
2153:
2146:
2144:
2137:
2118:
2110:
2105:
2073:
2070:
2051:
2048:
1985:
1958:disciplines'
1940:
1923:
1910:
1885:
1863:
1856:
1767:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1723:
1678:
1675:
1672:
1669:
1650:
1636:
1619:
1607:
1600:Myers-Briggs
1594:Myers-Briggs
1592:
1582:
1578:
1416:
1412:
1405:
1398:
1394:
1389:
1385:
1378:
1371:
1367:
1362:
1358:
1351:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1331:
1327:
1320:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1147:
1082:Netzwerkerin
950:
933:TesseUndDaan
926:
914:
899:
892:
867:
852:
722:
677:
575:
570:
566:
524:
520:
518:
493:
492:; note that
489:
486:organization
485:
481:
477:
466:
416:
376:
311:
271:
166:
134:
124:
62:WikiProjects
45:
2292:wikiversity
2083:Dam s.vador
2077:āPreceding
1688:70.22.240.9
1682:āPreceding
1666:Bad Writing
1500:subject to
954:āPreceding
879:please see
681:āPreceding
467:written in
2660:Categories
2528:BillWhiten
2514:BillWhiten
2352:John Bessa
2315:John Bessa
2296:this paper
2245:simulation
2140:WP:Copyvio
2049:Hi there,
1951:scientific
1809:AndyHuston
1769:AndyHuston
828:Simulation
142:Philosophy
131:philosophy
81:Philosophy
2259:articles.
2249:Structure
2074:PhDam's
2054:modelling
1954:critical.
1947:knowledge
1608:idealized
529:Eriatarka
50:is rated
2635:Felix QW
2583:Merging
2551:Tavadyan
2479:assumere
2304:elitists
2235:In this
2232:article.
2224:In this
2091:contribs
2079:unsigned
2058:modeling
1684:unsigned
1337:cardinal
956:unsigned
947:Overview
885:DCDuring
683:unsigned
580:Jbradfor
515:Spelling
2294:and in
1968:model).
490:analyse
482:realize
419:on the
392:Systems
383:systems
339:Systems
314:on the
287:Science
278:Science
234:Science
169:on the
86:Science
52:C-class
2491:sumere
2487:sumere
2421:-: -->
2253:system
1890:Rursus
1887:Said:
1868:Rursus
1865:Said:
1728:Rursus
1725:Said:
1411:,...,
1384:,...,
1357:,...,
1326:,...,
661:Jmdeur
636:Jmdeur
478:colour
58:scale.
2587:into
2568:iiii
2495:sumir
1118:uses.
574:"mode
471:with
39:This
2639:talk
2574:talk
2564:iiii
2555:talk
2532:talk
2518:talk
2500:---
2469:talk
2443:talk
2403:talk
2356:talk
2319:talk
2269:talk
2255:and
2237:edit
2226:edit
2210:talk
2198:here
2178:talk
2160:talk
2148:here
2125:talk
2087:talk
2056:and
2033:talk
2003:yet.
1991:talk
1843:talk
1826:all?
1813:talk
1794:talk
1773:talk
1708:talk
1692:talk
1657:talk
1251:grad
1128:talk
1086:talk
1030:and
1018:talk
981:talk
964:talk
937:talk
691:talk
665:talk
640:talk
619:talk
584:talk
549:talk
533:talk
494:-ize
385:and
306:High
2483:ad-
2439:Mdd
2426:-
2399:P0M
2265:Mdd
2263:--
2204:--
2154:--
1651:--
1598:.
1014:Mdd
977:Mdd
917:Mdd
903:Mdd
871:Mdd
856:Mdd
411:Top
161:Low
2662::
2641:)
2576:)
2557:)
2534:)
2520:)
2471:)
2445:)
2405:)
2358:)
2321:)
2271:)
2251:,
2247:,
2243:,
2212:)
2180:)
2162:)
2127:)
2093:)
2089:ā¢
2035:)
1993:)
1845:)
1815:)
1796:)
1775:)
1710:)
1694:)
1659:)
1583:is
1511:ā
1468:ā¦
1404:,
1377:,
1350:,
1319:,
1254:ā”
1248:ā
1181:?
1169:?
1165::
1130:)
1088:)
1020:)
983:)
966:)
939:)
693:)
667:)
642:)
621:)
586:)
576:ll
571:ll
551:)
535:)
521:ll
488:,
484:,
480:,
188:/
84::
2637:(
2572:(
2553:(
2530:(
2516:(
2467:(
2441:(
2401:(
2354:(
2317:(
2267:(
2208:(
2176:(
2158:(
2123:(
2114:.
2085:(
2031:(
1989:(
1926:.
1895:ā»
1873:ā»
1841:(
1811:(
1792:(
1771:(
1733:ā»
1706:(
1690:(
1655:(
1557:.
1554:M
1551:=
1546:i
1542:x
1536:i
1532:p
1526:n
1521:1
1518:=
1515:i
1484:)
1479:n
1475:x
1471:,
1465:,
1460:2
1456:x
1452:,
1447:1
1443:x
1439:(
1436:U
1417:n
1413:x
1409:2
1406:x
1402:1
1399:x
1397:(
1395:U
1390:n
1386:x
1382:2
1379:x
1375:1
1372:x
1368:M
1363:n
1359:x
1355:2
1352:x
1348:1
1345:x
1341:U
1332:n
1328:p
1324:2
1321:p
1317:1
1314:p
1310:n
1306:n
1278:.
1275:)
1272:)
1269:t
1266:(
1263:x
1260:(
1257:V
1245:=
1242:)
1239:t
1236:(
1233:x
1225:2
1221:t
1217:d
1211:2
1207:d
1201:m
1183:R
1179:R
1177::
1175:V
1171:R
1167:R
1163:x
1159:m
1126:(
1084:(
1016:(
979:(
962:(
935:(
689:(
663:(
638:(
617:(
582:(
567:l
547:(
531:(
525:l
508:.
476:(
441:.
423:.
389:.
318:.
173:.
64::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
