1129:)I see your point. Do we have reliable sources which charactize this group among "2012 establishments in the United States", "Firearms-related organizations", "Gun control advocacy groups in the United States", "Organizations established in 2012" , "Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting", and "Women's political advocacy groups in the United States"? Either we need sources for every category in every article, or we can use editorial discretion. Either we can call people "gun rights advocates" on our own, or we can repeat what the sources call them. Let's be consistent.
874:, mission statements are generally useless, and often full of POV puffery. A quick shout-out in the infobox (when in quotes) is probably okay, but going beyond that and parroting mission statements from either side seems like it will do little to educate the reader with neutral information. It is also probably undue/not notable unless and until it is covered by reliable sources. Even when a mission statement has been covered, it should always be quoted, rather than repeated in the encyclopedia's voice.
211:
193:
221:
22:
125:
71:
53:
308:
1362:
and notes that civil liberties are often enshrined in a bill of rights or a constitution. MDA advocates for reduced gun violence through gun control. That's not a civil liberties group, however much the side effect of their intention might speak to civil liberties. Can this discussion come to an end?
1254:
as a civil liberties org? For this specific dispute, either sources describing MDA specifically, or even more generally, sources describing gun control in general as a civil right/liberty, or even debating if they are or aren't. Life is certainly a civil liberty. On the flip side of the coin, you can
1315:
Reliable sources tend to depict the issue as having two sides. And yes, many gun control groups say they support the Second
Amendment, or responsible gun ownership. But reliable sources still depict them as being "on the other side" of the debate. The groups tend to be on one side or the other; they
1382:". This group seeks to reduce gun violence, violence which leads to the loss of around 30000 lives a year in the US. Here's a compromise: only use the "rights" categories for groups which have explicitly been called "civil liberties/rights advocates". That'd exclude random "gun rights" groups like
1330:
Just because people can be divided into two groups doesn't mean each 'side' moves in lock step. We can't decide that just because a group opposes gun control that they are automatically a civil liberties defender, and just because another group fights for the civil liberty of life doesn't mean that
841:
I think the issue is more one of pigeon-holing and labelling. If a group says their mission is to reduce gun violence then is it appropriate for us to say their real mission is to promote gun control? How about if we said that the NRA is not really in favor of "gun rights" but instead favors higher
826:
It doesn't much matter how many groups there are, or even what they are about-- NRA, IRS, NSA, CIA. What matters is standardization across similar topics so that readers have some continuity. Are the NRA and MDA (and other groups concerned with guns) similar enough that the way they are categorized
711:
I think we've gone back and forth on this. One question is whether the term should be standardized across Wiki for similar groups. Ie. Are MDA and the NR/A simply arguing opposite sides of the same coin (gun control) or are the advocates for two different things and therefore their pages should say
492:
If the mainstream sources haven't noted it, it isn't notable, by definition - not that we have any reason to believe that a partisan website like bearingarms.com was reporting it accurately in the first place. And we aren't the slightest bit interested in your personal opinion as to 'the mindset of
805:
I'm offended by the implication in the same way I'm offended by the implication that Moms Demand Action or
Everytown are secretly plotting to pave the way for a totalitarian takeover of the United States by the lizard people from Zorbrax 7. I don't think it's unreasonable to assume that the people
1411:
in your argument on the control side. On the other side of the coin, gun rights have been widely described as civil rights and at least in the US have been explicitly ruled so by SCOTUS. The gun rights groups are themselves regularly described as rights and liberties organizations. Beyond that
1283:
There are two sides of advocacy in the gun control/gun rights debate. But only one side that can be described as in rights/liberty terms. A similar dissonance happens in the pro-life/pro-choice debate. The immediate goal/actions of the "anti" side in both debates is to restrict what is commonly
1300:
It's a mistake to say that there are only two sides and that we, as WP editors, should decide what groups beleive based on our division of politics into those two sides. Some groups or individuals that favor gun control also say they support the 2nd
Amendment, for example, and some groups and
982:
In sorting out what to put, it's probably important to note that even the best descriptive term will hurt the authenticity of the article if the term is politically freighted. So, "gun control group" may not be the best term, even if it's spot-on. MDA is a "gun rights organization," just in a
466:
The source gives a screenshot of the now deleted twitter account with comment. The quote was identified by name when Ms Martin agreed with it, and praised it's wisdom. The mainstream press has not made mention of this relatively minor, yet notable in that it indicates the mindset of the
1412:
though, your specific example is wrong anyway. SAF is described (self and 3rd party) as a civil rights org, and has filed (and won) numerous civil rights lawsuits. Either drop the stick or start an RFC, but you are just wasting everyones time right now (including your own)
143:
696:
We should go with either "gun rights" or "gun control" where applicable (unless quoting sources directly), not "Second
Amendment rights" or "common-sense gun safety laws" or any other POV puffery. And that's a good point; "reform" is so vague as to be practically useless.
1452:
Going back, the consensus at NRA was to not include the category, bt then someone came along and added it without discussion. I've removed it pending a fresh consensus. Keeping it off all the gun politics articles will keep a level playing field.
888:
And that makes sense, yes. I think the point I was trying to make is that by indicating what the group's mission statement is, then it implicitly acknowledges the POV issue. Then the group can be categorized according to WP standards as well.
416:
It does not describe her position within the organization (other than as a "leader"). She is described as a "New York chapter leader". There is a significant difference in notability between the
President of the organization or a local
758:
for gun control certainly is, just as saying "God-given Second
Amendment rights" would be POV puffery for "gun rights". And I'd say it's offensive to imply that gun rights organisations aren't against gun violence. I don't know of
1316:
either support more restrictions or fewer. I'm not aware of any "middle ground" group besides Evolve, which stays in the middle by staying out of the legal questions entirely and focusing only on personal responsibility.
1255:
find hundreds of sources describing RKBA as a civil right/liberty (although there is certainly disagreement as to the scope of that right) and many sources further describing individual orgs as civil rights orgs.
1214:
The other cats above are not controversial. The civil liberties cat has been challenged. Provide a source that describes the MDA as a civil liberties org, or start an RFC to get wider input, or drop the stick.
1534:
251:
806:
involved on both sides of the issue are decent and are trying to do the right thing. Both sides want less gun violence, but they disagree on whether more gun control will do that.
1378:
The second sentence of the Wiki article on civil liberties says, "Though the scope of the term differs amongst various countries, some examples of civil liberties include ... the
998:
Yeah, so? The group says they're against "gun violence". I see no reasons not to say so. We can also say that X, Y, or Z say they are primarily or secondarily for "gun control".
407:
Agreeing with a quote from an unidentified person does not constitute support for that person. To suggest otherwise without a reliable secondary source is original research. See
1012:
Of course they're against gun violence. I can't think of a single organization on either side of the gun control debate in the United States that isn't against gun violence.
268:
1435:
I addressed this point when I wrote "That's not a civil liberties group, however much the side effect of their intention might speak to civil liberties." Let it go.
1524:
345:
The fact that they shun open debate, deliberately lie and twist facts, and resort to ad hominem attacks against those that disagree with them needs to be stated.
1529:
1509:
666:
As
Knowledge increasingly becomes a vehicle for promotion and advertising, this article is one more piece of evidence that any pretenses of this site being an
1514:
1539:
1519:
1115:
You have to show that reliable sources characterize it as such; your or any editor's opinion of whether it is a civil rights advocacy group is irrelevant.
258:
551:
modeled Moms Demand Action after
Mothers Against Drunk Driving."? I feel it should be the latter; we do not have a neutral party confirming it. Poking
791:(I've got a question about gun violence on the NRA talk page, if you want to explain why you're offended by the implication they aren't opposed to it. )
681:"Gun reform" is what both sides talk about. We oughta be careful about claiming that a groups stands for something when it ain't part of their mission.
521:
Because of ongoing vandalism, and because the page had temporary protection in the past, I have requested
Indefinite Page Protection for this page. See
1494:
1301:
individuals who favor gun rights say they are opposed to gun violence. It isn't a black/white issue and we would be inaccurate to depict it that way.
1284:
refereed to as a right. That their purpose in doing so is (by their own measure) altruistic does not shift them to protecting a civil liberty though.
1083:
You're assuming that gun control is a civil liberty (somehow), and you haven't provided any source that calls them a civil liberties advocacy group.
1499:
263:
159:
364:
763:
organization that advocates for gun violence. In fact, many gun rights organizations argue that expanding gun rights leads to less gun violence.
625:
The organizations merged over a year ago (and MDA has been a part of
Everytown for the majority of its existence). The pages should merge too.
1504:
483:
91:
1390:
647:
234:
198:
150:
130:
87:
328:
246:
777:
This article isn't about other groups. It's about this group. Why are there only two allowable designations? Who made that decision?
1251:
1055:
Is "life" not a civil right or civil liberty? That's why I added Category:Civil liberties advocacy groups in the United States.
441:
78:
58:
1470:
1468:
242:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
33:
1383:
413:
This paragraph does not demonstrate the notability of this particular quote. I see no mention in the mainstream press.
640:
Looks like just a puff piece. Many other pages were deleted because they were simply advertising, as this one is.
1250:
A particular mechanism of protecting life is not necessarily civil liberty though. For example, should we describe
929:
It appears that that's specific IRS language, though I think I'd prefer " 501(c)(3)" in the encyclopaedia's voice.
827:
on the pages should be standardized? Or are they dissimilar and so deserving of a different kind of categorization?
360:
1321:
1176:
1088:
1017:
964:
934:
879:
811:
768:
702:
630:
608:
564:
479:
320:
1413:
396:
The cited source does not meet Knowledge's sourcing standards, as it appears to be a self-published blog (see
651:
356:
21:
348:
Also, the fact that they are wholly funded by and used as attack dogs by Bloomberg needs to be addressed.
506:
1317:
1172:
1171:
You're assuming that gun control is life, something we definitely can't do in the encyclopaedia's voice.
1084:
1013:
960:
930:
875:
856:
One solution might be to delineate between "Organization's Stated Mission" and, I dunno, something else.
807:
764:
698:
626:
604:
560:
547:
Should the sentence be "Watts modeled Moms Demand Action after Mothers Against Drunk Driving." or "Watts
475:
1269:
I'll leave it for you guys to figure out. Just please be consistent in how advocacy groups are treated.
1234:
is assuming, then it's not based on anything verifiable. That's transgressing into politics-as-editing.
603:
Thanks, I'll try to keep that in mind. Why not change it to "said" or "stated" rather than reverting?
384:
On September 23rd, 2014, Moms Demand Action New York chapter leader Alison A. Martin posted support for
39:
86:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the
1120:
643:
471:
400:). It certainly does not meet wikipedia's standards for negative material about a living person (see
352:
226:
755:
446:
331:
for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
158:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1440:
1420:
1368:
1289:
1260:
1239:
1220:
988:
894:
861:
832:
717:
530:
422:
210:
192:
1476:
1458:
1398:
1336:
1306:
1274:
1190:
1185:
No, I'm assuming that opposition to deadly gun violence is equivalent to advocating for life.
1134:
1106:
1074:
1060:
1031:
1003:
950:
920:
871:
847:
796:
782:
745:
731:
686:
502:
493:
the organization's leadership'. This is an encyclopaedia, not your personal blog, and we have
575:
1358:
I'm not sure what this discussion is about anymore. Wiki itself defines civil liberties as
1359:
1116:
579:
385:
380:
The following paragraph does not conform to Knowledge's standards and should be removed:
467:
organization's leadership. Her full title is apprpriate and has been added to the edit.
913:
Would it be 'POV puffery' to call this group an "American social welfare organization"?
587:
522:
1488:
1436:
1416:
1379:
1364:
1285:
1256:
1235:
1216:
1098:
984:
890:
857:
828:
713:
526:
498:
494:
418:
408:
401:
239:
155:
842:
gun sales? We could find sources which say so, but it'd be a distortion. Same here.
1472:
1454:
1408:
1394:
1332:
1302:
1270:
1231:
1186:
1130:
1102:
1070:
1056:
1027:
999:
946:
916:
843:
792:
778:
741:
727:
682:
442:"Moms Demand Leader Honors The "Wise Words To Live By" Of Nazi Propaganda Minister"
397:
1331:
they are civil liberties opponents either. We either follow sources or we don't.
914:
142:
124:
216:
1480:
1462:
1444:
1424:
1402:
1372:
1340:
1325:
1310:
1293:
1278:
1264:
1243:
1224:
1194:
1180:
1138:
1124:
1110:
1092:
1078:
1064:
1021:
1007:
992:
968:
954:
938:
924:
898:
883:
865:
851:
836:
815:
800:
786:
772:
749:
735:
721:
706:
690:
655:
634:
612:
598:
591:
583:
568:
554:
534:
510:
426:
368:
70:
52:
1414:
http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=7405
679:"demand action...to establish common-sense gun reforms"), AKA gun control.)
238:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
1026:
Let's say the obvious. If that's what they support then we oughta say so.
740:
Opposition to gun violence is not "POV puffery". That's kinda offensive.
388:
to her twitter account, calling his statements, "wise words to live by."
83:
543:"Watts modeled Moms Demand Action after Mothers Against Drunk Driving."
501:) despite warnings, I have requested that you be blocked from editing.
1360:
personal guarantees and freedoms that the government cannot abridge
495:
policies concerning inappropriate content involving living persons
342:
I think that the tactics that MDA uses needs to be addressed.
302:
15:
1043:
Category:Civil liberties advocacy groups in the United States
1467:
I'm not sure what Giajin42's link is supposed to show.
1387:
944:
324:
315:
1535:
Redirect-Class United States articles of NA-importance
1097:
No, I'm assuming that "life" is a civil liberty. See
154:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
82:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
754:But saying "common-sense gun law reforms" as a
8:
641:
497:. Since you have ignored this policy (and
486:) 02:12, 25 September 2014‎ 192.138.82.196
306:
187:
119:
47:
943:Good for the goose, good for the gander.
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
313:Text and/or other creative content from
433:
189:
121:
49:
1525:Redirect-Class United States articles
232:This redirect is within the scope of
148:This redirect is within the scope of
76:This redirect is within the scope of
19:
7:
1530:NA-importance United States articles
1510:Redirect-Class organization articles
1515:NA-importance organization articles
1391:National Association for Gun Rights
726:e/c Why are those the two options?
279:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
168:Knowledge:WikiProject Organizations
38:It is of interest to the following
1540:WikiProject United States articles
1520:WikiProject Organizations articles
282:Template:WikiProject United States
171:Template:WikiProject Organizations
14:
621:Merge to Everytown for Gun Safety
323:on 2017-07-04. The former page's
1495:Redirect-Class Firearms articles
1252:National Right to Life Committee
559:because they reverted my edit.
219:
209:
191:
141:
123:
69:
51:
20:
1500:NA-importance Firearms articles
392:Please consider the following:
656:12:28, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
535:12:47, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
511:03:33, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
427:01:34, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
100:Knowledge:WikiProject Firearms
1:
1505:WikiProject Firearms articles
635:03:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
162:and see a list of open tasks.
103:Template:WikiProject Firearms
983:different way than the NRA.
613:04:05, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
592:04:02, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
569:03:59, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
1384:Second Amendment Foundation
1556:
1481:20:03, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
1463:19:48, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
1445:12:53, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
1425:19:30, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
1403:19:00, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
1373:16:56, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
1341:16:47, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
1326:17:03, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
1311:16:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
1294:16:32, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
1279:16:26, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
1265:16:21, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
1244:16:13, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
1225:16:02, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
1195:15:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
1181:15:52, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
1139:15:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
1125:15:36, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
1111:15:27, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
1093:03:40, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
1079:00:01, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
1065:04:08, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
1022:02:48, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
969:02:48, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
899:13:45, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
884:02:48, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
816:02:48, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
670:ring hollower every year.
1008:22:45, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
993:22:34, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
955:21:58, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
939:21:52, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
925:21:48, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
866:22:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
852:22:20, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
837:22:07, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
801:22:01, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
787:21:58, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
773:21:52, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
750:21:44, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
736:21:43, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
722:21:54, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
707:21:40, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
691:21:27, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
369:04:47, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
319:was copied or moved into
235:WikiProject United States
204:
151:WikiProject Organizations
136:
64:
46:
321:Everytown for Gun Safety
240:United States of America
1101:. Do you dispute that?
376:Joseph Goebbels comment
338:Tactics and Methodology
390:
285:United States articles
382:
174:organization articles
1407:You are engaging in
662:More WikiAdvertising
450:. September 24, 2014
227:United States portal
79:WikiProject Firearms
1047:(Split from above)
329:provide attribution
253:Articles Requested!
712:different things?
316:Moms Demand Action
90:and see a list of
34:content assessment
658:
646:comment added by
578:, particularly -
488:
474:comment added by
372:
357:Common Sense User
355:comment added by
335:
334:
301:
300:
297:
296:
293:
292:
186:
185:
182:
181:
118:
117:
114:
113:
106:Firearms articles
1547:
602:
558:
487:
468:
460:
459:
457:
455:
438:
371:
349:
318:
310:
309:
303:
287:
286:
283:
280:
277:
229:
224:
223:
222:
213:
206:
205:
195:
188:
176:
175:
172:
169:
166:
145:
138:
137:
127:
120:
108:
107:
104:
101:
98:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
25:
24:
16:
1555:
1554:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1485:
1484:
1045:
959:Fixed, thanks.
676:
674:AKA gun control
664:
623:
596:
552:
549:claims that she
545:
519:
517:Page Protection
469:
464:
463:
453:
451:
440:
439:
435:
386:Joseph Goebbels
378:
350:
340:
314:
307:
284:
281:
278:
275:
274:
273:
259:Become a Member
225:
220:
218:
173:
170:
167:
164:
163:
105:
102:
99:
96:
95:
12:
11:
5:
1553:
1551:
1543:
1542:
1537:
1532:
1527:
1522:
1517:
1512:
1507:
1502:
1497:
1487:
1486:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1318:Faceless Enemy
1247:
1246:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1173:Faceless Enemy
1156:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1085:Faceless Enemy
1044:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1014:Faceless Enemy
980:
979:
978:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
961:Faceless Enemy
931:Faceless Enemy
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
876:Faceless Enemy
824:
823:
822:
821:
820:
819:
818:
808:Faceless Enemy
765:Faceless Enemy
738:
724:
699:Faceless Enemy
675:
672:
663:
660:
639:
627:Faceless Enemy
622:
619:
618:
617:
616:
615:
605:Faceless Enemy
561:Faceless Enemy
544:
541:
539:
518:
515:
514:
513:
476:192.138.82.196
462:
461:
432:
431:
430:
429:
414:
411:
405:
377:
374:
339:
336:
333:
332:
327:now serves to
311:
299:
298:
295:
294:
291:
290:
288:
272:
271:
266:
261:
256:
249:
247:Template Usage
243:
231:
230:
214:
202:
201:
196:
184:
183:
180:
179:
177:
160:the discussion
146:
134:
133:
128:
116:
115:
112:
111:
109:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1552:
1541:
1538:
1536:
1533:
1531:
1528:
1526:
1523:
1521:
1518:
1516:
1513:
1511:
1508:
1506:
1503:
1501:
1498:
1496:
1493:
1492:
1490:
1483:
1482:
1478:
1474:
1471:
1469:
1465:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1415:
1410:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1385:
1381:
1380:right to life
1377:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1361:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1253:
1249:
1248:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1099:Civil liberty
1096:
1095:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1069:No response?
1068:
1067:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1042:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
996:
995:
994:
990:
986:
970:
966:
962:
958:
957:
956:
952:
948:
945:
942:
941:
940:
936:
932:
928:
927:
926:
922:
918:
915:
912:
900:
896:
892:
887:
886:
885:
881:
877:
873:
869:
868:
867:
863:
859:
855:
854:
853:
849:
845:
840:
839:
838:
834:
830:
825:
817:
813:
809:
804:
803:
802:
798:
794:
790:
789:
788:
784:
780:
776:
775:
774:
770:
766:
762:
757:
753:
752:
751:
747:
743:
739:
737:
733:
729:
725:
723:
719:
715:
710:
709:
708:
704:
700:
695:
694:
693:
692:
688:
684:
680:
673:
671:
669:
661:
659:
657:
653:
649:
648:98.219.46.216
645:
637:
636:
632:
628:
620:
614:
610:
606:
600:
595:
594:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
572:
571:
570:
566:
562:
556:
550:
542:
540:
537:
536:
532:
528:
524:
516:
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
491:
490:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
449:
448:
443:
437:
434:
428:
424:
420:
415:
412:
410:
406:
403:
399:
395:
394:
393:
389:
387:
381:
375:
373:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
346:
343:
337:
330:
326:
322:
317:
312:
305:
304:
289:
276:United States
270:
267:
265:
262:
260:
257:
255:
254:
250:
248:
245:
244:
241:
237:
236:
228:
217:
215:
212:
208:
207:
203:
200:
199:United States
197:
194:
190:
178:
165:Organizations
161:
157:
156:Organizations
153:
152:
147:
144:
140:
139:
135:
132:
131:Organizations
129:
126:
122:
110:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1466:
1451:
1357:
1213:
1046:
981:
760:
678:
677:
668:encyclopedia
667:
665:
642:— Preceding
638:
624:
548:
546:
538:
520:
503:AndyTheGrump
470:— Preceding
465:
454:24 September
452:. Retrieved
447:Bearing Arms
445:
436:
391:
383:
379:
351:— Preceding
347:
344:
341:
264:Project Talk
252:
233:
149:
77:
40:WikiProjects
29:
1230:Agreed. If
1489:Categories
1117:Anastrophe
872:WP:MISSION
92:open tasks
88:discussion
756:euphemism
576:WP:WEASEL
574:No. Read
1437:Prof. Mc
1417:Gaijin42
1365:Prof. Mc
1286:Gaijin42
1257:Gaijin42
1236:Prof. Mc
1217:Gaijin42
985:Prof. Mc
891:Prof. Mc
858:Prof. Mc
829:Prof. Mc
714:Prof. Mc
644:unsigned
580:WP:CLAIM
527:Prof. Mc
484:contribs
472:unsigned
419:GabrielF
365:contribs
353:unsigned
97:Firearms
84:firearms
59:Firearms
30:redirect
1473:Felsic2
1455:Felsic2
1395:Felsic2
1333:Felsic2
1303:Felsic2
1271:Felsic2
1232:Felsic2
1187:Felsic2
1131:Felsic2
1103:Felsic2
1071:Felsic2
1057:Felsic2
1028:Felsic2
1000:Felsic2
947:Felsic2
917:Felsic2
844:Felsic2
793:Felsic2
779:Felsic2
742:Felsic2
728:Felsic2
683:Felsic2
523:WP:RFPP
417:leader.
325:history
1393:Fair?
499:WP:3RR
409:WP:NOR
402:WP:BLP
269:Alerts
36:scale.
1409:WP:OR
398:WP:RS
28:This
1477:talk
1459:talk
1441:talk
1421:talk
1399:talk
1389:and
1369:talk
1337:talk
1322:talk
1307:talk
1290:talk
1275:talk
1261:talk
1240:talk
1221:talk
1191:talk
1177:talk
1135:talk
1121:talk
1107:talk
1089:talk
1075:talk
1061:talk
1032:talk
1018:talk
1004:talk
989:talk
965:talk
951:talk
935:talk
921:talk
895:talk
880:talk
870:Per
862:talk
848:talk
833:talk
812:talk
797:talk
783:talk
769:talk
746:talk
732:talk
718:talk
703:talk
687:talk
652:talk
631:talk
609:talk
599:KH-1
588:talk
584:KH-1
565:talk
555:KH-1
531:talk
507:talk
480:talk
456:2014
423:talk
361:talk
761:any
582:. -
1491::
1479:)
1461:)
1443:)
1423:)
1401:)
1371:)
1339:)
1324:)
1309:)
1292:)
1277:)
1263:)
1242:)
1223:)
1193:)
1179:)
1137:)
1123:)
1109:)
1091:)
1077:)
1063:)
1020:)
1006:)
991:)
967:)
953:)
937:)
923:)
897:)
882:)
864:)
850:)
835:)
814:)
799:)
785:)
771:)
748:)
734:)
720:)
705:)
689:)
654:)
633:)
611:)
590:)
567:)
533:)
525:.
509:)
482:•
444:.
425:)
367:)
363:•
1475:(
1457:(
1439:(
1419:(
1397:(
1386:.
1367:(
1335:(
1320:(
1305:(
1288:(
1273:(
1259:(
1238:(
1219:(
1189:(
1175:(
1133:(
1119:(
1105:(
1087:(
1073:(
1059:(
1034:)
1030:(
1016:(
1002:(
987:(
963:(
949:(
933:(
919:(
893:(
878:(
860:(
846:(
831:(
810:(
795:(
781:(
767:(
744:(
730:(
716:(
701:(
685:(
650:(
629:(
607:(
601::
597:@
586:(
563:(
557::
553:@
529:(
505:(
478:(
458:.
421:(
404:)
359:(
94:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
