651:
colleagues who ignore
Mathscinet because it misses much of the literature in areas such as error analysis of finite elements and numerical PDEs. Unfortunately I do not have the time to go search further for an independent source that would say this is a significant loss or relevance. Geombinatorics is abstracted, I checked. I have yet to come across any international or US based or European mathematical journal that is not covered. I believe you it misses large number of third world journals. But "MathSciNet contains information for articles from a large number of mathematical journals" as you wrote is vague and misses completely the importance of this resource. So, why don't you write what you know instead of the "large number"?
91:
64:
378:
368:
344:
31:
210:
192:
101:
298:
273:
715:
beyond the scope of the paper tools used in the first 40 years. There are many derived products that provide windows into subsets of the root content of the
Database and subsets of the linking relationships that exist between entries in the Database. It is expected that new technologies will continue to provide new channels to the content of the Mathematical Reviews Database.
22:
893:
is an editor with no substantial editing record in namespace articles and no experience at all in editing mathematics articles. From what other editors have written elsewhere, he seems to be gaming the system against a senior mathematics editor. It will end in tears for him if he persists. In simple
714:
Since its inception in 1940, the
Mathematical Reviews Database of bibliographic listings and reviews of published mathematical research, together with associated data, has grown not only in size but also in complexity. Since 1980, electronic tools for its maintenance have allowed layered information
650:
Well, I described the situation as I know it. In my experience, it covers all that matters with the unfortunate exception of many mathematical articles in engineering journals, even major international engineering journals. Of course the reason I know that is that it missed some of mine, and I have
630:
I removed "from nearly all" once again. This is false and the burden of proof is NOT on me but on whoever wants to claim that. I added the reference which lists the number of math journal (18,000 as of 2001) but not the breakdown how many of them cover-to-cover. I know for a fact existence of a
576:
Well, to me an evaluative statement like "significant loss of relevance" already feels a little OR-like, which is why I asked for a reference. I didn't really mean making a list of exclusions, I meant more whether you can find a published source that includes a similar line about why MathSciNet is
519:
it is stated that "When a work is in an unusual language only bibliographic information may be given.". i propose to change this in a way that is true in longer term and also is neutral. a replacement would be : "When a reviewer familiar with the language of a work is not easily found, only
980:
639:
is just one of them - other are listed on his "resume". I would believe if you claimed "nearly all US based" or "nearly all
English language international" mathematical journals, but as stated this is misleading at best.
528:
the editors decide one way or the other. I see only the result, which is what I described - with "unusual" meaning "other than a major
Western language". I understand this is not neutral but that's the way it is.
35:
970:
666:
For reasons unknown, user
Mathsci has chosen to delete a sentence recording the fact that the Mathematics Reviews database was, as is, available from two commercial providers under the name and trademark
985:
157:
916:
Two points. First, it seems to me that
Mathsci is correct and A.K.Nole is simply wrong on the issues. Although I don't have the hard data, it seems to me the vast majority of users do not use
1030:
448:
631:
large number of journals in the third world countries (usually in languages other than
English) which are not covered. To see a glimpse into this, consider the case of a serial plagiarist
169:
74:
253:
499:
implies that titles of books and other works should be capitalized, and AMS also capitalizes "reviews". Unless somebody is going to protest, I will find an admin to do so. --
562:. I concur but do not have a source to cite. I know of many articles that should have been included but were not, but making such list and explaining why smells too much of
1005:
995:
174:
147:
1025:
496:
226:
1040:
1020:
438:
520:
bibliographic information may be given.". though it is not much better, but the original quote above should, in my opinion, be changed. klash23oct2006.
965:
123:
1000:
990:
975:
217:
197:
400:
590:
I decided to make the change. Feel free to edit it if you feel strongly about the "loss" but explain your reasoning and sources here first.
1035:
864:
424:
114:
69:
1015:
1010:
776:
In 1980, all the contents of
Mathematical Reviews since 1940 were integrated into an electronic searchable database, to be known as
746:
391:
349:
960:
304:
278:
858:
772:, which is what I maintained all along, I assume we are now agreed to reinsert the disputed text, which I remind you read
753:. MathSciNet is the name of the online version. MathSci Disc is the name of the earlier largely superseded multidisc set.
750:
721:
708:
924:, which even in this minor case seems relevant. Second, there is no need for the "end in tears" comment. This borders
44:
602:
OK, I have reformulated the paragraph using sourced statements only. I have considered earlier labeling the section
606:
but that would not remove the need for sources. If I come across a suitable reference I might return to the issue.
90:
63:
679:, and a press release from the publisher itself, the AMS. No good reason for this deletion: the edit summary
882:
504:
50:
377:
870:
742:
309:
283:
21:
621:
578:
549:
399:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
225:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
122:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
852:
837:
732:
688:
383:
367:
343:
899:
758:
632:
500:
222:
921:
928:. In fact, since Mathsci suggests A.K.Nole is a new editor, it also seem to contradict
804:
209:
191:
937:
929:
636:
430:
119:
954:
847:
833:
785:
728:
684:
676:
652:
607:
567:
556:
530:
486:
814:
635:
who tends to publish in journals not covered by the MathSciNet to avoid detection.
100:
925:
895:
754:
563:
106:
617:
474:
396:
941:
903:
841:
762:
736:
692:
655:
644:
624:
610:
594:
581:
570:
533:
508:
489:
297:
272:
485:
Shouldn't the article title be Mathematical Reviews (capitalize "reviews")? --
373:
96:
933:
641:
591:
699:
781:
672:
920:
and know MR online under the name MathSciNet. I would simply refer to
824:
894:
words: mind you own business, A.K.Nole. Go and play a video game.
981:
Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
718:* Mathematical Reviews * MathSciNet * MathSci on Dialog©
741:(noindent) MathSci is the name of the electronic database for
705:
540:
Significant loss of relevance of MathSciNet for applied fields
433:
in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
429:
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
15:
671:. The sources supplied are datasheets from those suppliers,
788:. In 1999 the AMS completed the transfer to MathSci form.
768:
If you now accept that MathSci is indeed the name of the
971:
Knowledge vital articles in Society and social sciences
888:
876:
680:
616:
I don't know that it says what you want it to say, but
545:
986:
C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
395:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
221:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
118:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
712:Mathematical Reviews Database Publication Formats
1031:B-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
832:Feel free to propose a more elegant phraseology.
780:. The database was made available online through
698:Additional reference from the publisher web site
784:'s DIALOG service and sold in CD format through
307:, a project which is currently considered to be
473:I created ; it deserves some filling out. ----
497:Knowledge:Naming conventions (capitalization)
8:
577:less used or less useful in applied areas. —
254:WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide
338:
267:
186:
58:
258:for tips on how to improve this article.
797:
340:
269:
235:Knowledge:WikiProject Academic Journals
188:
60:
19:
1006:Mid-importance Science pearls articles
996:Mid-importance Bibliographies articles
238:Template:WikiProject Academic Journals
1026:WikiProject Academic Journal articles
7:
389:This article is within the scope of
303:This article is within the scope of
215:This article is within the scope of
132:Knowledge:WikiProject Bibliographies
112:This article is within the scope of
135:Template:WikiProject Bibliographies
49:It is of interest to the following
431:project-independent quality rating
14:
1041:Low-priority mathematics articles
1021:C-Class Academic Journal articles
747:Current Mathematical Publications
409:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
966:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
412:Template:WikiProject Mathematics
376:
366:
342:
296:
271:
208:
190:
99:
89:
62:
29:
20:
1001:C-Class Science pearls articles
991:C-Class Bibliographies articles
443:This article has been rated as
319:Knowledge:WikiProject Databases
152:This article has been rated as
976:C-Class level-5 vital articles
322:Template:WikiProject Databases
1:
751:American Mathematical Society
403:and see a list of open tasks.
229:and see a list of open tasks.
218:WikiProject Academic Journals
167:This article is supported by
126:and see a list of open tasks.
1036:B-Class mathematics articles
1057:
1016:WikiProject Bibliographies
1011:WikiProject Science pearls
509:16:14, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
115:WikiProject Bibliographies
942:00:32, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
904:00:18, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
842:21:17, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
763:20:12, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
737:19:19, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
693:19:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
662:MathSci versus MathSciNet
490:19:01, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
442:
428:
361:
291:
249:
241:Academic Journal articles
203:
166:
151:
84:
57:
656:04:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
645:10:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
625:17:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
611:17:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
595:16:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
582:16:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
571:16:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
566:. Any help appreciated.
534:16:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
477:20:31, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
449:project's priority scale
392:WikiProject Mathematics
138:Bibliographies articles
961:C-Class vital articles
683:does not enlighten.
305:WikiProject Databases
170:the Science Taskforce
36:level-5 vital article
743:Mathematical Reviews
550:User: David Eppstein
415:mathematics articles
544:This statement was
384:Mathematics portal
325:Databases articles
45:content assessment
749:published by the
726:
725:
620:looks relevant. —
463:
462:
459:
458:
455:
454:
337:
336:
333:
332:
266:
265:
262:
261:
232:Academic Journals
223:Academic Journals
198:Academic Journals
185:
184:
181:
180:
1048:
892:
865:deleted contribs
826:
822:
816:
812:
806:
802:
706:
561:
555:
417:
416:
413:
410:
407:
386:
381:
380:
370:
363:
362:
357:
354:
346:
339:
327:
326:
323:
320:
317:
300:
293:
292:
287:
275:
268:
243:
242:
239:
236:
233:
212:
205:
204:
194:
187:
158:importance scale
140:
139:
136:
133:
130:
109:
104:
103:
93:
86:
85:
80:
77:
66:
59:
42:
33:
32:
25:
24:
16:
1056:
1055:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1047:
1046:
1045:
951:
950:
850:
846:Unfortunately
829:
823:
819:
813:
809:
803:
799:
719:
664:
559:
553:
542:
517:
483:
475:Charles Stewart
471:
414:
411:
408:
405:
404:
382:
375:
355:
352:
324:
321:
318:
315:
314:
281:
240:
237:
234:
231:
230:
137:
134:
131:
128:
127:
105:
98:
78:
72:
43:on Knowledge's
40:
30:
12:
11:
5:
1054:
1052:
1044:
1043:
1038:
1033:
1028:
1023:
1018:
1013:
1008:
1003:
998:
993:
988:
983:
978:
973:
968:
963:
953:
952:
949:
948:
947:
946:
945:
944:
909:
908:
907:
906:
828:
827:
817:
807:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
790:
724:
723:
720:
717:
710:
704:
703:
663:
660:
659:
658:
637:Geombinatorics
628:
627:
622:David Eppstein
600:
599:
598:
597:
585:
584:
579:David Eppstein
541:
538:
537:
536:
524:I do not know
516:
513:
512:
511:
482:
481:Capitalization
479:
470:
467:
465:
461:
460:
457:
456:
453:
452:
441:
435:
434:
427:
421:
420:
418:
401:the discussion
388:
387:
371:
359:
358:
347:
335:
334:
331:
330:
328:
301:
289:
288:
276:
264:
263:
260:
259:
247:
246:
244:
227:the discussion
213:
201:
200:
195:
183:
182:
179:
178:
175:Mid-importance
165:
162:
161:
154:Mid-importance
150:
144:
143:
141:
129:Bibliographies
124:the discussion
120:Bibliographies
111:
110:
94:
82:
81:
79:Mid‑importance
70:Bibliographies
67:
55:
54:
48:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1053:
1042:
1039:
1037:
1034:
1032:
1029:
1027:
1024:
1022:
1019:
1017:
1014:
1012:
1009:
1007:
1004:
1002:
999:
997:
994:
992:
989:
987:
984:
982:
979:
977:
974:
972:
969:
967:
964:
962:
959:
958:
956:
943:
939:
935:
931:
927:
923:
919:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
905:
901:
897:
890:
887:
884:
881:
878:
875:
872:
869:
866:
863:
860:
857:
854:
849:
845:
844:
843:
839:
835:
831:
830:
825:
821:
818:
815:
811:
808:
805:
801:
798:
791:
789:
787:
786:SilverPlatter
783:
779:
774:
773:
771:
767:
766:
765:
764:
760:
756:
752:
748:
744:
739:
738:
734:
730:
716:
711:
707:
701:
697:
696:
695:
694:
690:
686:
682:
678:
677:SilverPlatter
674:
670:
661:
657:
654:
649:
648:
647:
646:
643:
638:
634:
626:
623:
619:
615:
614:
613:
612:
609:
605:
596:
593:
589:
588:
587:
586:
583:
580:
575:
574:
573:
572:
569:
565:
558:
551:
547:
539:
535:
532:
527:
523:
522:
521:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
493:
492:
491:
488:
480:
478:
476:
468:
466:
450:
446:
440:
437:
436:
432:
426:
423:
422:
419:
402:
398:
394:
393:
385:
379:
374:
372:
369:
365:
364:
360:
351:
348:
345:
341:
329:
312:
311:
306:
302:
299:
295:
294:
290:
285:
280:
277:
274:
270:
257:
256:
255:
248:
245:
228:
224:
220:
219:
214:
211:
207:
206:
202:
199:
196:
193:
189:
176:
173:(assessed as
172:
171:
164:
163:
159:
155:
149:
146:
145:
142:
125:
121:
117:
116:
108:
102:
97:
95:
92:
88:
87:
83:
76:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
37:
27:
23:
18:
17:
917:
885:
879:
873:
867:
861:
855:
820:
810:
800:
777:
775:
769:
740:
727:
713:
668:
665:
629:
603:
601:
543:
525:
518:
501:Jitse Niesen
484:
472:
464:
445:Low-priority
444:
390:
356:Low‑priority
308:
252:
251:
216:
168:
153:
113:
107:Books portal
51:WikiProjects
34:
633:Dănuț Marcu
406:Mathematics
397:mathematics
350:Mathematics
955:Categories
883:block user
877:filter log
889:block log
618:this link
495:I agree,
316:Databases
279:Databases
39:is rated
922:WP:UNDUE
859:contribs
848:A.K.Nole
834:A.K.Nole
782:Lockheed
770:database
729:A.K.Nole
685:A.K.Nole
673:Lockheed
653:Jmath666
608:Jmath666
604:Critique
568:Jmath666
531:Jmath666
487:Edemaine
469:Untitled
310:inactive
284:inactive
930:WP:BITE
896:Mathsci
778:MathSci
755:Mathsci
669:MathSci
515:UNUSUAL
447:on the
353:B‑class
156:on the
75:Science
41:C-class
918:Dialog
546:marked
47:scale.
926:WP:PA
564:WP:OR
28:This
938:talk
934:Mhym
900:talk
871:logs
853:talk
838:talk
759:talk
745:and
733:talk
700:here
689:talk
681:here
675:and
642:Mhym
592:Mhym
557:Fact
505:talk
250:See
932:.
552:as
548:by
526:why
439:Low
148:Mid
957::
940:)
902:)
840:)
761:)
735:)
722:”
709:“
691:)
560:}}
554:{{
507:)
177:).
73::
936:(
898:(
891:)
886:·
880:·
874:·
868:·
862:·
856:·
851:(
836:(
757:(
731:(
702::
687:(
503:(
451:.
425:B
313:.
286:)
282:(
160:.
53::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
