662:
colleagues who ignore
Mathscinet because it misses much of the literature in areas such as error analysis of finite elements and numerical PDEs. Unfortunately I do not have the time to go search further for an independent source that would say this is a significant loss or relevance. Geombinatorics is abstracted, I checked. I have yet to come across any international or US based or European mathematical journal that is not covered. I believe you it misses large number of third world journals. But "MathSciNet contains information for articles from a large number of mathematical journals" as you wrote is vague and misses completely the importance of this resource. So, why don't you write what you know instead of the "large number"?
102:
75:
389:
379:
355:
42:
221:
203:
112:
309:
284:
726:
beyond the scope of the paper tools used in the first 40 years. There are many derived products that provide windows into subsets of the root content of the
Database and subsets of the linking relationships that exist between entries in the Database. It is expected that new technologies will continue to provide new channels to the content of the Mathematical Reviews Database.
33:
904:
is an editor with no substantial editing record in namespace articles and no experience at all in editing mathematics articles. From what other editors have written elsewhere, he seems to be gaming the system against a senior mathematics editor. It will end in tears for him if he persists. In simple
725:
Since its inception in 1940, the
Mathematical Reviews Database of bibliographic listings and reviews of published mathematical research, together with associated data, has grown not only in size but also in complexity. Since 1980, electronic tools for its maintenance have allowed layered information
661:
Well, I described the situation as I know it. In my experience, it covers all that matters with the unfortunate exception of many mathematical articles in engineering journals, even major international engineering journals. Of course the reason I know that is that it missed some of mine, and I have
641:
I removed "from nearly all" once again. This is false and the burden of proof is NOT on me but on whoever wants to claim that. I added the reference which lists the number of math journal (18,000 as of 2001) but not the breakdown how many of them cover-to-cover. I know for a fact existence of a
587:
Well, to me an evaluative statement like "significant loss of relevance" already feels a little OR-like, which is why I asked for a reference. I didn't really mean making a list of exclusions, I meant more whether you can find a published source that includes a similar line about why MathSciNet is
530:
it is stated that "When a work is in an unusual language only bibliographic information may be given.". i propose to change this in a way that is true in longer term and also is neutral. a replacement would be : "When a reviewer familiar with the language of a work is not easily found, only
991:
650:
is just one of them - other are listed on his "resume". I would believe if you claimed "nearly all US based" or "nearly all
English language international" mathematical journals, but as stated this is misleading at best.
539:
the editors decide one way or the other. I see only the result, which is what I described - with "unusual" meaning "other than a major
Western language". I understand this is not neutral but that's the way it is.
46:
981:
677:
For reasons unknown, user
Mathsci has chosen to delete a sentence recording the fact that the Mathematics Reviews database was, as is, available from two commercial providers under the name and trademark
996:
168:
927:
Two points. First, it seems to me that
Mathsci is correct and A.K.Nole is simply wrong on the issues. Although I don't have the hard data, it seems to me the vast majority of users do not use
1041:
459:
642:
large number of journals in the third world countries (usually in languages other than
English) which are not covered. To see a glimpse into this, consider the case of a serial plagiarist
180:
85:
264:
510:
implies that titles of books and other works should be capitalized, and AMS also capitalizes "reviews". Unless somebody is going to protest, I will find an admin to do so. --
573:. I concur but do not have a source to cite. I know of many articles that should have been included but were not, but making such list and explaining why smells too much of
1016:
1006:
185:
158:
1036:
507:
237:
1051:
1031:
449:
531:
bibliographic information may be given.". though it is not much better, but the original quote above should, in my opinion, be changed. klash23oct2006.
976:
134:
1011:
1001:
986:
228:
208:
411:
601:
I decided to make the change. Feel free to edit it if you feel strongly about the "loss" but explain your reasoning and sources here first.
1046:
875:
435:
125:
80:
1026:
1021:
787:
In 1980, all the contents of
Mathematical Reviews since 1940 were integrated into an electronic searchable database, to be known as
757:
402:
360:
971:
315:
289:
869:
783:, which is what I maintained all along, I assume we are now agreed to reinsert the disputed text, which I remind you read
764:. MathSciNet is the name of the online version. MathSci Disc is the name of the earlier largely superseded multidisc set.
761:
732:
719:
935:, which even in this minor case seems relevant. Second, there is no need for the "end in tears" comment. This borders
55:
613:
OK, I have reformulated the paragraph using sourced statements only. I have considered earlier labeling the section
617:
but that would not remove the need for sources. If I come across a suitable reference I might return to the issue.
101:
74:
690:, and a press release from the publisher itself, the AMS. No good reason for this deletion: the edit summary
893:
515:
61:
388:
881:
753:
320:
294:
32:
632:
589:
560:
410:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
236:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
133:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
863:
848:
743:
699:
394:
378:
354:
910:
769:
643:
511:
233:
932:
17:
939:. In fact, since Mathsci suggests A.K.Nole is a new editor, it also seem to contradict
815:
220:
202:
948:
940:
647:
441:
130:
965:
858:
844:
796:
739:
695:
687:
663:
618:
578:
567:
541:
497:
825:
646:
who tends to publish in journals not covered by the MathSciNet to avoid detection.
111:
936:
906:
765:
574:
117:
628:
485:
407:
952:
914:
852:
773:
747:
703:
666:
655:
635:
621:
605:
592:
581:
544:
519:
500:
308:
283:
496:
Shouldn't the article title be Mathematical Reviews (capitalize "reviews")? --
384:
107:
944:
652:
602:
710:
792:
683:
931:
and know MR online under the name MathSciNet. I would simply refer to
835:
905:
words: mind you own business, A.K.Nole. Go and play a video game.
992:
Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
729:* Mathematical Reviews * MathSciNet * MathSci on Dialog©
752:(noindent) MathSci is the name of the electronic database for
716:
551:
Significant loss of relevance of MathSciNet for applied fields
444:
in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
440:
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
26:
682:. The sources supplied are datasheets from those suppliers,
799:. In 1999 the AMS completed the transfer to MathSci form.
779:
If you now accept that MathSci is indeed the name of the
982:
Knowledge vital articles in Society and social sciences
899:
887:
691:
627:
I don't know that it says what you want it to say, but
556:
997:
C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
406:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
232:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
129:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
723:Mathematical Reviews Database Publication Formats
1042:B-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
843:Feel free to propose a more elegant phraseology.
791:. The database was made available online through
709:Additional reference from the publisher web site
795:'s DIALOG service and sold in CD format through
318:, a project which is currently considered to be
484:I created ; it deserves some filling out. ----
508:Knowledge:Naming conventions (capitalization)
8:
588:less used or less useful in applied areas. —
265:WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide
349:
278:
197:
69:
269:for tips on how to improve this article.
808:
351:
280:
246:Knowledge:WikiProject Academic Journals
199:
71:
30:
1017:Mid-importance Science pearls articles
1007:Mid-importance Bibliographies articles
249:Template:WikiProject Academic Journals
1037:WikiProject Academic Journal articles
7:
400:This article is within the scope of
314:This article is within the scope of
226:This article is within the scope of
143:Knowledge:WikiProject Bibliographies
123:This article is within the scope of
146:Template:WikiProject Bibliographies
60:It is of interest to the following
442:project-independent quality rating
25:
1052:Low-priority mathematics articles
1032:C-Class Academic Journal articles
758:Current Mathematical Publications
420:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
977:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
423:Template:WikiProject Mathematics
387:
377:
353:
307:
282:
219:
201:
110:
100:
73:
40:
31:
1012:C-Class Science pearls articles
1002:C-Class Bibliographies articles
454:This article has been rated as
330:Knowledge:WikiProject Databases
163:This article has been rated as
987:C-Class level-5 vital articles
333:Template:WikiProject Databases
1:
762:American Mathematical Society
414:and see a list of open tasks.
240:and see a list of open tasks.
229:WikiProject Academic Journals
178:This article is supported by
137:and see a list of open tasks.
1047:B-Class mathematics articles
1068:
1027:WikiProject Bibliographies
1022:WikiProject Science pearls
520:16:14, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
126:WikiProject Bibliographies
953:00:32, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
915:00:18, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
853:21:17, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
774:20:12, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
748:19:19, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
704:19:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
673:MathSci versus MathSciNet
501:19:01, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
453:
439:
372:
302:
260:
252:Academic Journal articles
214:
177:
162:
95:
68:
18:Talk:Mathematical reviews
667:04:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
656:10:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
636:17:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
622:17:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
606:16:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
593:16:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
582:16:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
577:. Any help appreciated.
545:16:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
488:20:31, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
460:project's priority scale
403:WikiProject Mathematics
149:Bibliographies articles
972:C-Class vital articles
694:does not enlighten.
316:WikiProject Databases
181:the Science Taskforce
47:level-5 vital article
754:Mathematical Reviews
561:User: David Eppstein
426:mathematics articles
555:This statement was
395:Mathematics portal
336:Databases articles
56:content assessment
760:published by the
737:
736:
631:looks relevant. —
474:
473:
470:
469:
466:
465:
348:
347:
344:
343:
277:
276:
273:
272:
243:Academic Journals
234:Academic Journals
209:Academic Journals
196:
195:
192:
191:
16:(Redirected from
1059:
903:
876:deleted contribs
837:
833:
827:
823:
817:
813:
717:
572:
566:
428:
427:
424:
421:
418:
397:
392:
391:
381:
374:
373:
368:
365:
357:
350:
338:
337:
334:
331:
328:
311:
304:
303:
298:
286:
279:
254:
253:
250:
247:
244:
223:
216:
215:
205:
198:
169:importance scale
151:
150:
147:
144:
141:
120:
115:
114:
104:
97:
96:
91:
88:
77:
70:
53:
44:
43:
36:
35:
27:
21:
1067:
1066:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1058:
1057:
1056:
962:
961:
861:
857:Unfortunately
840:
834:
830:
824:
820:
814:
810:
730:
675:
570:
564:
553:
528:
494:
486:Charles Stewart
482:
425:
422:
419:
416:
415:
393:
386:
366:
363:
335:
332:
329:
326:
325:
292:
251:
248:
245:
242:
241:
148:
145:
142:
139:
138:
116:
109:
89:
83:
54:on Knowledge's
51:
41:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1065:
1063:
1055:
1054:
1049:
1044:
1039:
1034:
1029:
1024:
1019:
1014:
1009:
1004:
999:
994:
989:
984:
979:
974:
964:
963:
960:
959:
958:
957:
956:
955:
920:
919:
918:
917:
839:
838:
828:
818:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
801:
735:
734:
731:
728:
721:
715:
714:
674:
671:
670:
669:
648:Geombinatorics
639:
638:
633:David Eppstein
611:
610:
609:
608:
596:
595:
590:David Eppstein
552:
549:
548:
547:
535:I do not know
527:
524:
523:
522:
493:
492:Capitalization
490:
481:
478:
476:
472:
471:
468:
467:
464:
463:
452:
446:
445:
438:
432:
431:
429:
412:the discussion
399:
398:
382:
370:
369:
358:
346:
345:
342:
341:
339:
312:
300:
299:
287:
275:
274:
271:
270:
258:
257:
255:
238:the discussion
224:
212:
211:
206:
194:
193:
190:
189:
186:Mid-importance
176:
173:
172:
165:Mid-importance
161:
155:
154:
152:
140:Bibliographies
135:the discussion
131:Bibliographies
122:
121:
105:
93:
92:
90:Mid‑importance
81:Bibliographies
78:
66:
65:
59:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1064:
1053:
1050:
1048:
1045:
1043:
1040:
1038:
1035:
1033:
1030:
1028:
1025:
1023:
1020:
1018:
1015:
1013:
1010:
1008:
1005:
1003:
1000:
998:
995:
993:
990:
988:
985:
983:
980:
978:
975:
973:
970:
969:
967:
954:
950:
946:
942:
938:
934:
930:
926:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
916:
912:
908:
901:
898:
895:
892:
889:
886:
883:
880:
877:
874:
871:
868:
865:
860:
856:
855:
854:
850:
846:
842:
841:
836:
832:
829:
826:
822:
819:
816:
812:
809:
802:
800:
798:
797:SilverPlatter
794:
790:
785:
784:
782:
778:
777:
776:
775:
771:
767:
763:
759:
755:
750:
749:
745:
741:
727:
722:
718:
712:
708:
707:
706:
705:
701:
697:
693:
689:
688:SilverPlatter
685:
681:
672:
668:
665:
660:
659:
658:
657:
654:
649:
645:
637:
634:
630:
626:
625:
624:
623:
620:
616:
607:
604:
600:
599:
598:
597:
594:
591:
586:
585:
584:
583:
580:
576:
569:
562:
558:
550:
546:
543:
538:
534:
533:
532:
525:
521:
517:
513:
509:
505:
504:
503:
502:
499:
491:
489:
487:
479:
477:
461:
457:
451:
448:
447:
443:
437:
434:
433:
430:
413:
409:
405:
404:
396:
390:
385:
383:
380:
376:
375:
371:
362:
359:
356:
352:
340:
323:
322:
317:
313:
310:
306:
305:
301:
296:
291:
288:
285:
281:
268:
267:
266:
259:
256:
239:
235:
231:
230:
225:
222:
218:
217:
213:
210:
207:
204:
200:
187:
184:(assessed as
183:
182:
175:
174:
170:
166:
160:
157:
156:
153:
136:
132:
128:
127:
119:
113:
108:
106:
103:
99:
98:
94:
87:
82:
79:
76:
72:
67:
63:
57:
49:
48:
38:
34:
29:
28:
19:
928:
896:
890:
884:
878:
872:
866:
831:
821:
811:
788:
786:
780:
751:
738:
724:
679:
676:
640:
614:
612:
554:
536:
529:
512:Jitse Niesen
495:
483:
475:
456:Low-priority
455:
401:
367:Low‑priority
319:
263:
262:
227:
179:
164:
124:
118:Books portal
62:WikiProjects
45:
644:Dănuț Marcu
417:Mathematics
408:mathematics
361:Mathematics
966:Categories
894:block user
888:filter log
900:block log
629:this link
506:I agree,
327:Databases
290:Databases
50:is rated
933:WP:UNDUE
870:contribs
859:A.K.Nole
845:A.K.Nole
793:Lockheed
781:database
740:A.K.Nole
696:A.K.Nole
684:Lockheed
664:Jmath666
619:Jmath666
615:Critique
579:Jmath666
542:Jmath666
498:Edemaine
480:Untitled
321:inactive
295:inactive
941:WP:BITE
907:Mathsci
789:MathSci
766:Mathsci
680:MathSci
526:UNUSUAL
458:on the
364:B‑class
167:on the
86:Science
52:C-class
929:Dialog
557:marked
58:scale.
937:WP:PA
575:WP:OR
39:This
949:talk
945:Mhym
911:talk
882:logs
864:talk
849:talk
770:talk
756:and
744:talk
711:here
700:talk
692:here
686:and
653:Mhym
603:Mhym
568:Fact
516:talk
261:See
943:.
563:as
559:by
537:why
450:Low
159:Mid
968::
951:)
913:)
851:)
772:)
746:)
733:”
720:“
702:)
571:}}
565:{{
518:)
188:).
84::
947:(
909:(
902:)
897:·
891:·
885:·
879:·
873:·
867:·
862:(
847:(
768:(
742:(
713::
698:(
514:(
462:.
436:B
324:.
297:)
293:(
171:.
64::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
