Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Maxtor

Source đź“ť

1076:
management in late 1993. Hyundai was trying to get out of the unprofitable PC/AT clone business and move into the lucrative high-end workstation business, and they needed a captive hard drive supplier. In the fall of 1993, Maxtor management, headed by then-CEO Laurence "Larry" Hootnik, decided to stake the company's future on the "Racer" series of commodity drives, designed at the former Miniscribe facility in Longmont, Colorado, and to shut down engineering operations at the headquarters location in San Jose, California. The deal with Hyundai became effective on February 4, 1994 and the engineering talent was ushered out the door wholesale on February 7. Unfinished designs were left in a poorly documented state, and it didn't take long for Hyundai to realize that they were holding an empty bag: They needed the high-end drives from San Jose for their workstations, not the low-end drives from Longmont. I'm not sure when they dumped their interest in Maxtor, but it probably happened sometime in 1994 or 1995. We heard later that Hootnik was asked to leave in June 1994 and was given $ 3 million as a parting gift. Go figure. —
778:(circa 1990). Although Sequel didn't have the facilities to build the XT series drives from scratch, they were capable of refurbishing them — repairing circuit boards and rebuilding head and disk stacks. Since Maxtor had sold so many XT drives in the first ten years of its existence and many of those had gone into high-end industrial and commercial applications, there was a market for long-term support services. Before the AT and SCSI interfaces evolved, systems used a number of other drive controller schemes (SMD, Disk Bus, SASI, etc.), mostly obsolete by the time Sequel took over. Since redesigning systems to use the new interface schemes would have been cost-prohibitive, it made sense to keep the old drives available for them. With the advent of low-cost industry standard 3.5-inch AT and SCSI drives that were easily swapped between vendors and rivaled 5.25-inch and larger earlier designs in performance, interest in repairability and maintainability disappeared. If such a drive failed, it would simply be discarded and replaced with a new unit, usually cheaper and with higher storage capacity and better performance. — 174: 80: 1096:. There should be a mention of this in the article. The MaxOptix logo was originally in the same font and shade of blue that Maxtor Corporation used for its logo. MaxOptix still exists as a brand, although it is now headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and has changed owners a few times. Sorry, I don't know the dates that MaxOptix was incorporated or spun off, but it would have been around 1990-1991, if memory serves. — 53: 320: 493: 472: 90: 231: 210: 162: 22: 241: 894:, which I found was very good at shipping faulty replacements. After receiving each bad replacement, I escallated my frustrations to a new level of management until I finally had a VP pull a drive from stock. My fourth (?!?!) replacement drive lasted about another 18 months. It was the worst customer experience I had until I met 797:
worked right; my brother and I got one in exchange for a zapped Quantum 120MB back in 1993, and that thing still tops our "worst ever" list (and it turned us off Maxtor for years; my brother prices drives for systems we build, and he likes Seagate and Samsung these days). It'd lose data, it'd corrupt
1041:
The hostile takeover of Solectron by Flextronics is very similar to what happened to Maxtor Corporation. Mike Cannon was CEO of Maxtor for a while, then left for Solectron. Paul Tufano was "interim CEO" for a while. Soon after that Maxtor was bought out by Seagate. Mike Cannon was CEO of Selectron,
741:, Maxtor's management got in the habit of quarterly layoffs to shore up the bottom line. The executive staff were generally non-technical, drawn mostly from the ranks of accountants and marketers. They exhibited an arrogance toward and distrust of the engineering staff, referring to them openly as 727:
Their XT-series of 5.25-inch full-height drives, although noisy, were reliable workhorses, with no equal in the industry from 1982-1992. In 1991 Maxtor was inflicted with a CEO and executive staff who decided the company would no longer build "boutique" drives, preferring to jump into the commodity
1015:
I heard something about that Seagate labels his "value" HDD (low cost, low realibility), so people gonna buy it (true, I saw it many times) because "Maxtor is the best !" and they relabelled the best Maxtor's products "Seagate", in order to make people think Seagate is the best of the best. True ?
798:
data randomly, and no matter what you set the jumpers to (which there were far too many of), it'd freak out eventually -- almost all of that was firmware, and I supposed they were rushed to finish it by The Management. The DiamondMax drives at least have their firmware debugged most of the time...
732:
to provide a sample 3.5-inch SCSI disk drive for testing in a spaceborne application. Maxtor management turned them down, but one of the engineers sneaked a drive out to them anyway. Some time later we heard that the Maxtor drive was the only one still running; Seagate, Quantum, Western Digital,
957:
How about their support? RIght now I am trying to recover someone's Onetouch4 that has been corrupted. The software is messed up and going to maxtor.com gives me links to download the software "in case it got deleted from the drive" When you click on that link they say you need to contact tech
1075:
It's true, although Hyundai didn't own 100% of Maxtor. Maxtor was in serious financial trouble in 1992-1993, flirting with insolvency, and was looking for a cash infusion. They thought they had found it in Hyundai, who reportedly purchased 40% of Maxtor stock for $ 150 million and a stake in
737:) Most of their 3.5-inch offerings never came close in reliability to the original product line, particularly those designed in Longmont, Colorado. The company also had a horrible internal culture. Design documentation was a mess, turnover was high, and layoffs were frequent. Like a 1005:
As far as I can tell, the "new" Maxtor is just a brand, being positioned at the "value" market. The new DiamondMax 20 and 21 are relabelled Seagates, and Maxtor's high-end SCSI stuff (which was inherited from Quantum in any case) isn't even advertised anymore.
1130: 889:
drive with about 550 MB (nearly cutting-edge back then) and a 3-year warranty. When it died (totally and without warning) after about 18-20 months, I had found that Maxtor had somehow delegated "support" for the product to a company called
944:
For sure Maxtor had ups and downs with quality over the years. But posting anecdotes about personal experiences, good or bad, is meaningless. What's needed are references to information about rate of units returned for specific models.
918:+1, I only know Maxtor because of their bad realibility (not the recent HDD of course, the previous one), we should add it, I think this article is not well written, really look like a "glossy corporate snapshot" :/ (Klem, 692:
Their quality has fallen dramatically SINCE being acquired by seagate, I got a new maxtor HDD not realising they'd been acquired and it broke after 3 months, although my OLD HDD's that were Maxtor never had a problem...
728:
disk drive market, i.e., low cost and low reliability. That marked the end of Maxtor as a significant force in the disk drive industry. (There was one interesting exception, though. In 1992 they were approached by
187: 63: 969:
I was under the impression that Maxtor is now totally gone and replaced by Seagate, however it is still listed as a subsidiary of Seagate... I have no proof to prove my point (except for the Maxtor page being gone
1091:
When I worked at Maxtor there was an in-house MaxOptix development operation on River Oaks Parkway in San Jose, California, that eventually moved out and became an independent spin-off, manufacturing 5.25-inch
1131:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080913160547/http://www.seagate.com/ww/v/index.jsp?locale=en-US&name=Seagate_Technology_To__Acquire_Maxtor_Corporation&vgnextoid=1e8a814fef83e010VgnVCM100000dd04090aRCRD
338: 441: 1134: 793:
I wonder if this is why the 7000 series hung on for so long despite being horribly long in the tooth by about 1995 or so. I mentioned the 7120 in the article, by the way, because I don't think they
1378: 192: 774:
When Maxtor decided to get out of the 5.25-inch drive business around 1992-1993, they sold the rights to their older designs to Sequel in Santa Clara, California, a spin-off from
1383: 1272: 1268: 1254: 1162: 1158: 1144: 1373: 573:
Western Digital, Iomega, Seagate, and all these guys have a list of competitors on their Knowledge (XXG) article. Pretty standard section for a Wiki on a big company.
1135:
http://www.seagate.com/ww/v/index.jsp?locale=en-US&name=Seagate_Technology_To__Acquire_Maxtor_Corporation&vgnextoid=1e8a814fef83e010VgnVCM100000dd04090aRCRD
860:(had heading "Horrible quality":) never again maxtor. my drive crashed within 11 months. i was pissed as soon as i installed it because it was loud as hell too. -- 152: 551: 297: 870:
I had some very poor experiences with Maxtor, to the point that I decided to never use it again c. 1994. (The other HDD manufacturer I had disqualified was
1368: 377: 364: 142: 1413: 541: 1398: 1388: 287: 643:. I have a bunch of different Maxtor models, collected over the years, running without any problems. Further the low cost service hotline provides 118: 1403: 745:. For some reason Maxtor was never able to attract a good executive staff, and as a result the company was its own worst enemy. I was there. -- 517: 263: 663:
You should play the lottery since it seems you have exceptional luck. I believe "Maxtor" come from the Latin for "Crap won't last six months"
757:
Great war story, Quicksilver. Thanks for sharing it. (By the way, do you know anything about a company called Sequel? See my comment below.) --
371: 1363: 597: 351: 1408: 1017: 919: 840: 670: 103: 58: 694: 500: 477: 254: 215: 1393: 1250:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1140:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1065: 908:
Why are the drive reliability issues not in the article? The Maxtor article should not be a simple glossy corporate snapshot. -
1418: 345: 332: 33: 432: 358: 179: 1345: 1315: 1205: 1240: 1042:
followed by Tufano as "interim CEO" of Solectron prior to their acquisition. Might be worth noting in the article.
1271:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1161:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
996:
Yeah, I was surprised to still see new Maxtor products (namely external hard disks) still for sale recently. --
601: 384: 39: 1341: 1306: 1232: 1196: 1122: 1021: 923: 844: 698: 674: 1334: 836: 666: 593: 1228: 513: 404: 809: 1290:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1278: 1180:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1168: 1093: 1061: 652: 516:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
262:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
117:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1231:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1121:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 909: 718: 1043: 946: 21: 871: 833:
No, this is a title that should never be past tense for them. Maxtor, corrupting data forever.
1275:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1165:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1330:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
1291: 1181: 1007: 988: 882:
on its 20 MB models. At least, now that they've merged, I have only one brand name to avoid.)
799: 625: 95: 617: 397: 1097: 1077: 1057: 1056:
I am trying to research Maxtor being owned by Hyndai for a period of time in the 1990's? --
997: 823: 779: 746: 390: 246: 1298: 1188: 738: 421: 1257:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1147:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 974: 899: 758: 742: 319: 1297:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1264: 1187:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1154: 1357: 808:
maxtor is, without a doubt, the worst of the mainstream hard drive manufacturers --
621: 79: 52: 1241:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070930181748/http://www.crn.com/it-channel/18811626
983:
It appears that Seagate will be using the Maxtor name as a consumer brand. See:
1340:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —
492: 471: 1263:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1153:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 895: 861: 236: 169: 113: 108: 85: 509: 958:
support. I'm pretty sure contacting anyone isn't downloading the software.
1244: 505: 161: 1326:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
259: 230: 209: 1224: 1114: 775: 339:
Knowledge (XXG):Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
937:
They should market their drives as secure file deletion utilities.
886: 875: 729: 616:
There is no need to discuss the product quality since it's not
15: 984: 1349: 1320: 1210: 1100: 1080: 1069: 1046: 1025: 1010: 1000: 991: 977: 949: 927: 912: 902: 864: 848: 826: 812: 802: 782: 761: 749: 721: 702: 678: 655: 647:
according to some technical enquiries i placed in the past.
629: 605: 160: 1235:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1125:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
822:
the worst of the mainstream hard drive manufacturers". --
733:
etc., had all failed. A potential public relations coup
971: 107:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 1118: 504:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 258:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1267:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1157:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 965:
Should Maxtor still be listed as an active company?
885:Around late 1992, I had bought a full-height 5.25" 641:quality hard disk drives and leading technology 1379:Low-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles 1253:This message was posted before February 2018. 1143:This message was posted before February 2018. 8: 378:Category:Company articles needing infoboxes 365:Category:Company articles needing attention 1384:San Francisco Bay Area task force articles 1223:I have just modified one external link on 1113:I have just modified one external link on 878:-- mean time between failures -- of about 466: 327:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 305: 204: 47: 1374:B-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles 468: 206: 49: 19: 1245:http://www.crn.com/it-channel/18811626 1216:External links modified (January 2018) 639:Maxtor is still the best supplier for 127:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject California 526:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computing 403:Help expand stub articles located at 272:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Companies 7: 498:This article is within the scope of 352:Category:Unassessed company articles 252:This article is within the scope of 101:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 1369:Low-importance California articles 14: 1414:Low-importance Computing articles 1227:. Please take a moment to review 1117:. Please take a moment to review 649:Maxtor remains my first choice!!! 188:San Francisco Bay Area task force 491: 470: 429:Tag company talk pages with the 318: 239: 229: 208: 172: 88: 78: 51: 20: 1399:Low-importance company articles 1389:WikiProject California articles 973:, so any input is appreciated. 874:, after regularly observing an 546:This article has been rated as 292:This article has been rated as 147:This article has been rated as 130:Template:WikiProject California 1404:WikiProject Companies articles 645:best of class customer support 529:Template:WikiProject Computing 418:Tag company articles with the 275:Template:WikiProject Companies 1: 1070:18:04, 26 December 2008 (UTC) 1026:14:42, 14 February 2008 (UTC) 928:14:42, 14 February 2008 (UTC) 903:16:14, 15 February 2007 (UTC) 762:16:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC) 722:12:11, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 679:09:21, 22 December 2008 (UTC) 656:23:44, 13 December 2005 (UTC) 606:23:59, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 576:Can we start one for Maxtor? 520:and see a list of open tasks. 266:and see a list of open tasks. 185:This article is supported by 180:San Francisco Bay Area portal 121:and see a list of open tasks. 1321:00:42, 23 January 2018 (UTC) 1101:00:54, 16 October 2010 (UTC) 865:02:29, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 827:12:04, 28 January 2006 (UTC) 750:12:04, 28 January 2006 (UTC) 309:WikiProject Companies To-do: 1364:B-Class California articles 849:00:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC) 813:12:26, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 1435: 1409:B-Class Computing articles 1284:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1220:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1174:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1110:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 985:http://maxtorsolutions.com 803:15:04, 11 April 2006 (UTC) 552:project's importance scale 298:project's importance scale 153:project's importance scale 1081:20:05, 30 June 2009 (UTC) 1047:22:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 1001:22:10, 12 June 2007 (UTC) 992:21:25, 11 June 2007 (UTC) 978:06:51, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 950:22:19, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 913:19:56, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 783:20:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC) 630:18:55, 23 July 2009 (UTC) 545: 486: 304: 291: 224: 168: 146: 73: 46: 1394:B-Class company articles 1350:11:52, 14 May 2019 (UTC) 1211:16:30, 6 June 2017 (UTC) 1011:04:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 703:19:50, 8 July 2009 (UTC) 1106:External links modified 1419:All Computing articles 1094:magneto-optical drives 514:information technology 405:Category:Company stubs 165: 104:WikiProject California 64:San Francisco Bay Area 28:This article is rated 717:They die too easily. 501:WikiProject Computing 442:requests for comments 433:WikiProject Companies 255:WikiProject Companies 164: 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 1265:regular verification 1155:regular verification 1255:After February 2018 1145:After February 2018 1087:MaxOptix connection 569:Why no Competitors? 133:California articles 1342:Community Tech bot 1309:InternetArchiveBot 1260:InternetArchiveBot 1199:InternetArchiveBot 1150:InternetArchiveBot 532:Computing articles 166: 34:content assessment 1285: 1175: 1052:Owned by Hyundai? 839:comment added by 743:"propeller heads" 669:comment added by 596:comment added by 566: 565: 562: 561: 558: 557: 465: 464: 461: 460: 457: 456: 453: 452: 203: 202: 199: 198: 96:California portal 1426: 1319: 1310: 1283: 1282: 1261: 1209: 1200: 1173: 1172: 1151: 851: 681: 608: 534: 533: 530: 527: 524: 495: 488: 487: 482: 474: 467: 436: 425: 391:Portal:Companies 333:Article requests 322: 315: 314: 306: 280: 279: 278:company articles 276: 273: 270: 249: 247:Companies portal 244: 243: 242: 233: 226: 225: 220: 212: 205: 182: 177: 176: 175: 135: 134: 131: 128: 125: 98: 93: 92: 91: 82: 75: 74: 69: 66: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 1434: 1433: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1354: 1353: 1335:Maxtor 60gb.JPG 1328: 1313: 1308: 1276: 1269:have permission 1259: 1233:this simple FaQ 1218: 1203: 1198: 1166: 1159:have permission 1149: 1123:this simple FaQ 1108: 1089: 1054: 1039: 1037:History Repeats 967: 834: 818:Make that "... 715: 664: 637: 614: 612:Product quality 591: 583:Western Digital 571: 531: 528: 525: 522: 521: 480: 449: 446: 430: 419: 277: 274: 271: 268: 267: 245: 240: 238: 218: 178: 173: 171: 132: 129: 126: 123: 122: 94: 89: 87: 67: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 1432: 1430: 1422: 1421: 1416: 1411: 1406: 1401: 1396: 1391: 1386: 1381: 1376: 1371: 1366: 1356: 1355: 1338: 1337: 1327: 1324: 1303: 1302: 1295: 1248: 1247: 1239:Added archive 1217: 1214: 1193: 1192: 1185: 1138: 1137: 1129:Added archive 1107: 1104: 1088: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1053: 1050: 1038: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1003: 966: 963: 962: 961: 960: 959: 942: 941: 940: 939: 938: 932: 931: 906: 868: 858: 857: 856: 855: 854: 853: 852: 810:213.208.105.20 806: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 767: 766: 765: 764: 725: 714: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 685: 684: 683: 682: 636: 633: 613: 610: 598:209.76.124.126 588: 587: 584: 581: 570: 567: 564: 563: 560: 559: 556: 555: 548:Low-importance 544: 538: 537: 535: 518:the discussion 496: 484: 483: 481:Low‑importance 475: 463: 462: 459: 458: 455: 454: 451: 450: 448: 447: 445: 444: 438: 437:project banner 427: 415: 407: 393: 380: 367: 354: 341: 326: 324: 323: 311: 310: 302: 301: 294:Low-importance 290: 284: 283: 281: 264:the discussion 251: 250: 234: 222: 221: 219:Low‑importance 213: 201: 200: 197: 196: 193:Low-importance 184: 183: 167: 157: 156: 149:Low-importance 145: 139: 138: 136: 119:the discussion 100: 99: 83: 71: 70: 68:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1431: 1420: 1417: 1415: 1412: 1410: 1407: 1405: 1402: 1400: 1397: 1395: 1392: 1390: 1387: 1385: 1382: 1380: 1377: 1375: 1372: 1370: 1367: 1365: 1362: 1361: 1359: 1352: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1336: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1325: 1323: 1322: 1317: 1312: 1311: 1300: 1296: 1293: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1280: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1256: 1251: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1221: 1215: 1213: 1212: 1207: 1202: 1201: 1190: 1186: 1183: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1170: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1146: 1141: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1111: 1105: 1103: 1102: 1099: 1095: 1086: 1082: 1079: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1051: 1049: 1048: 1045: 1036: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1018:193.49.48.244 1014: 1013: 1012: 1009: 1004: 1002: 999: 995: 994: 993: 990: 989:Austin Murphy 986: 982: 981: 980: 979: 976: 972: 964: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 948: 936: 935: 934: 933: 929: 925: 921: 920:193.49.48.244 917: 916: 915: 914: 911: 905: 904: 901: 897: 893: 888: 883: 881: 877: 873: 867: 866: 863: 850: 846: 842: 841:72.181.253.68 838: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 825: 821: 817: 816: 815: 814: 811: 805: 804: 801: 796: 784: 781: 777: 773: 772: 771: 770: 769: 768: 763: 760: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 748: 744: 740: 736: 731: 724: 723: 720: 712: 704: 700: 696: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 680: 676: 672: 671:72.181.253.68 668: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 654: 653:83.141.80.138 650: 646: 642: 634: 632: 631: 627: 623: 619: 611: 609: 607: 603: 599: 595: 585: 582: 579: 578: 577: 574: 568: 553: 549: 543: 540: 539: 536: 519: 515: 511: 507: 503: 502: 497: 494: 490: 489: 485: 479: 476: 473: 469: 443: 439: 434: 428: 423: 417: 416: 414: 412: 408: 406: 402: 400: 399: 394: 392: 389: 387: 386: 381: 379: 376: 374: 373: 368: 366: 363: 361: 360: 355: 353: 350: 348: 347: 342: 340: 337: 335: 334: 329: 328: 325: 321: 317: 316: 313: 312: 308: 307: 303: 299: 295: 289: 286: 285: 282: 265: 261: 257: 256: 248: 237: 235: 232: 228: 227: 223: 217: 214: 211: 207: 194: 191:(assessed as 190: 189: 181: 170: 163: 159: 158: 154: 150: 144: 141: 140: 137: 120: 116: 115: 110: 106: 105: 97: 86: 84: 81: 77: 76: 72: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 1339: 1329: 1307: 1304: 1279:source check 1258: 1252: 1249: 1222: 1219: 1197: 1194: 1169:source check 1148: 1142: 1139: 1112: 1109: 1090: 1055: 1040: 968: 943: 910:71.49.165.13 907: 891: 884: 879: 869: 859: 819: 807: 794: 792: 734: 726: 716: 695:82.34.113.51 648: 644: 640: 638: 615: 589: 575: 572: 547: 499: 424:|Companies}} 410: 409: 396: 395: 383: 382: 370: 369: 357: 356: 344: 343: 331: 330: 293: 253: 186: 148: 112: 102: 40:WikiProjects 1098:Quicksilver 1078:Quicksilver 1058:IrishDragon 998:Zilog Jones 835:—Preceding 824:Quicksilver 780:Quicksilver 747:Quicksilver 665:—Preceding 592:—Preceding 1358:Categories 1316:Report bug 1206:Report bug 719:71.15.44.3 124:California 114:California 109:U.S. state 59:California 1299:this tool 1292:this tool 1189:this tool 1182:this tool 1044:IbnFadlan 975:Nabeel_co 947:IbnFadlan 900:Johnlogic 759:Johnlogic 523:Computing 510:computing 506:computers 478:Computing 269:Companies 260:companies 216:Companies 1305:Cheers.— 1195:Cheers.— 1066:contribs 837:unsigned 667:unsigned 594:unsigned 426:template 385:Maintain 359:Copyedit 1229:my edit 1119:my edit 1016:(Klem, 880:30 days 872:Seagate 739:bulemic 735:wasted! 622:Xandrus 590:More? 586:Adaptec 580:Quantum 550:on the 440:Answer 372:Infobox 296:on the 151:on the 30:B-class 1225:Maxtor 1115:Maxtor 892:Sequel 776:Unisys 512:, and 422:portal 346:Assess 36:scale. 896:Apple 862:Jawed 411:Other 398:Stubs 1346:talk 1062:talk 1022:talk 1008:-lee 924:talk 898:. -- 887:SCSI 876:MTBF 845:talk 800:-lee 795:ever 730:NASA 699:talk 675:talk 626:talk 618:NPOV 602:talk 1273:RfC 1243:to 1163:RfC 1133:to 987:-- 820:was 713:Con 635:Pro 542:Low 288:Low 143:Low 111:of 1360:: 1348:) 1286:. 1281:}} 1277:{{ 1176:. 1171:}} 1167:{{ 1068:) 1064:• 1024:) 926:) 847:) 701:) 677:) 651:-- 628:) 620:. 604:) 508:, 435:}} 431:{{ 420:{{ 195:). 62:: 1344:( 1318:) 1314:( 1301:. 1294:. 1208:) 1204:( 1191:. 1184:. 1060:( 1028:) 1020:( 930:) 922:( 843:( 697:( 673:( 624:( 600:( 554:. 413:: 401:: 388:: 375:: 362:: 349:: 336:: 300:. 155:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
California
San Francisco Bay Area
WikiProject icon
California portal
WikiProject California
U.S. state
California
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
San Francisco Bay Area portal
San Francisco Bay Area task force
Low-importance
WikiProject icon
Companies
WikiProject icon
Companies portal
WikiProject Companies
companies
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale

Article requests
Knowledge (XXG):Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑