Talk:Madlax/Archive 1

308:: Then I suppose that'll have to be Margaret, Madlax, Vanessa, Elenore, Monday, Carrossea and Limelda. The rest will have to go to a separate article. Additionally, what is meant by "mentioned"? How detailed should the information about them be? The problem is, if we cut the chara section significantly, we'll have to expand the plot summary, since it will become incomprehensible. Summary is already huge as it is despite the six hours I've spent condensing it. However, now that I think of it, the problem can be solved by wikilinking particular names in the summary to the sections of the chara article, like I did in 128:, and I intend to simply copy-paste the whole thing into this article (overwriting the old content). Therefore I ask everyone to check whether I have missed something out that is the article right now, but isn't in my translation. Thank you. PS: Oh, and I'll copy the missing screenshots from Russian Knowledge when they are needed. Right now, I'll go translate the episode list. PPS: Please, don't mind the spelling mistakes, grammar and incorrect name spellings at this point, right now, it's only about the content. -- 736:

guess....") are definitely going to need backing up, rewording, or deletion. In the shoujo-ai section, you can't just say it's impossible that there is some kind of desire, as that's exactly what original research is. Even if you found a secondary source saying this, you would have to go "some think it's impossible..." Even the speculations by fans have to be backed (althought I guess in this case a forum should do). Same for Yamaani, and the possible reasons for bad reception. -Sidi

2166:"Eiri Masami is introduced as the project director on Protocol 7 (a successor to IPv6) for major computer company Tachibana Labs. He has secretly included code of his own creation to give himself control of the Wired through the wireless system described above. He then "uploaded” his consciousness into the Wired and died in real life a few days after. These details are unveiled around the middle of the series, but this is the point where the story of Serial Experiments Lain begins." 263:: I have already read about that somewhere, so I considered moving some trivia to the other sections: the easter egg goes to "Releases"; Four Civilizations and fnords - to the "Holy Books"; Kajiura-related infos to the staff section (see above); Laetitia and, possibly, Colonel Burton to "Characters" and eventually a separate article (see below). The only things that are really trivial are: Darwin, Hong Kong, Hitomi no Kakera, red shoes and Maneki Neko. 211:: I admit I have a problem with recognizing the statements that need to be sourced. :( I'll probably need to ask you or someone to mark them with "facts" once translation is copied over (tomorrow, if nothing goes wrong). More importantly: is it really mandatory to write complete sentences rather than just episode numbers? Because the references can become real *huge*, as some episodes (especially in the end) contain multiple important revelations. 31: 384:: Well, we can move it to the Terminology section and rename it to "Background" or something like that. Like, the section "Background" containing subsections "Terminology", "Holy Books", and "Weapons". OR we can simply stick with a link to the BTF Wiki article in the refs, as it was done in the Russia article, since BTFW contains all the guns mentioned in the table plus lots of links to other specialized sites. 453:: That's a bit problematic, for, as I've remarked in "Reception", the series has relieved *very* moderate attention. In fact, it's very hard to find decent reviews about it and as for the prizes, I'm afraid it hasn't got any. ^^ Another point is that I have no idea where to get the sales data for animes... The problem with the origins and inspiration is that most of the info is likely contained within 2360:

eh). I also changed around a bit of the criticism; the ref on the "slow pacing of the early episodes" went to THEM, and while other reviews (like the ANN one) complained about slow pacing, THEM didn't- they thought the first episodes were just plain bad in general. I refashioned it to be a bit more about the style of the action sequences, which leads into the "realism vs. supernatural" issue later.

2555:? :D Unfortunately, I can't get the German translation any higher than GA status because Germans have weird criteria for their FAs (e.g.: "FA must be at least 80 kB big"; it's not explicitly stated but implied). And I don't speak any other languages. ^^; Though I must also admit that I've never edited Simple English articles before so I may not be aware of customs and content guidelines there... -- 695:. You might want to have a look to see what's expected from an FA. This is as far as it gets from the fan page. You can notice there how little place is granted to the plot, characters, action, etc, and much more to an analyse, critique, and overall description of the anime and the place it holds in contemporary culture. 1924:), I want to remark that although that formatting is all right for a VG article, in an anime series' one, it becomes a little messy: we have the name of the series in italics, the episode number, the time, the character's name in bold, and the quote itself without any separators around it. By comparison, in 2293:

Mm. This gets into a fundamental problem with the "cite sources" approach of Knowledge. Suppose an average work (movie, book, TV series, whatever) gets 50 good reviews and 50 bad reviews. It's quite possible to, by selectively citing, make it look like it received generally positive reviews with a

2228:

of the civil war, the big evil corporation, etc.) except Margaret Burton's checkbook, pretty much. For sure, the factional conflict issue is raised earlier, but it's dropped nigh-completely later, and the only ones opposing Enfant are individual characters. I'd be in favor of dropping this comment.

2227:

Okay, this has two references backing it up, but they're from reviews of the second DVD before later episodes were released. I would have said this too at the time, but it's not really true in light of the whole series. There's one faction, Enfant, and it controls all the pseudo-factions (the sides

1029:

Actaully, I think there's kind of a guideline or something asking that most images be placed on the right, or else it would be "distracting". I'm not sure bu I remember someone demanding that all images in the beginning of a section be placed on the right, in the Lain GAC or FAC.... I personally find

336:

Well, the seven characters are actually the ones portrayed on the top-right picture. %) As for the voice actors, I DO have them all listed within the respective character descriptions. Though if we move the characters to a separate article, we can make a table with the names and put it to the "Staff"

2276:

Not sure if there's a good term for this, but that wasn't quite my impression. He wanted a radical democracy where everybody does whatever they like uninhibited, and he also thought (apparently correctly?) that people become raving psychotic loons when this happens. "World war" implies coordinated

1748:

Ok, with VA table removed, we once again have a whole lot of white space to the right of the staff list. Since I don't like that (it gives an impression that the article is "stretced long" with lists), I suggest that we make a table out of Staff section the way we had VAs formatted before. And music

1496:

I would try to organize the section without using sub-headings. Make clear, distinct paragraphs for each sub-section you would have. You can also try to put up titles in bold, without cluttering the Table of Contents. These can be title-style, separate from the sub sections, or you can just put them

1396:

The first wow I've made when I started working on anime articles was to never ever interfere with Eva's entries - I wonder how anyone managed to write something definite about it, in the first place. So, sorry, I can't be of much help there... -_- But that's leading us too far off topic, I'm afraid.

87:

That could be a solution for the problem, very useful for those who prefer to know more of the series without have to watch it entirely, however, this could be bad for others, anyhood, I think someone could talk about symbolism ofthe series, bcs there is a lot of it (I think one of the reason why no

1792:

How can TOC be defined hidden by default? I've temporarily named "plot + chara + themes" oversection "Story" (see my sandbox). Do you have any other suggestions?.. The picture of an OST cover will be no problem, I'll do it later today. Madlax action figures will be a bit tougher, though - I'll have

1357:

I think it's time we submit it for GAC. As I said before, I'm pretty sure it will need to be trimmed down to the essential sourced information for FA, but it might just have a chance for GA. Just need to cover the citation needed tags, and post it. If it doesn't do the trick this time, it'll give a

1210:

Actually, I don't think you need the inlets to be online to quote them. They're print material, arent't they? So just quote them as is, with as much references (impression, edition, whatever) as you can. To clear out doubts, I'd go with full quotes on this one as it's not the most easily verifiable

1143:

Much more harmonious. It does, however, highlight the length of the characters section, that has been bothering me from the very start. I understand they are all crucial characters (as they are all on the TV tokyo site and the cover), but maybe you could just manage a short text at the beginning of

326:

for a less clean one. Don't worry about having a long plot summary, as it will be trimmed down afterwards. Most plot summaries begin small, then get bigger and bigger and more trivial until someone rewrites it from scratch, and that two or three times, before they stabilize. Wikilinking is always a

178:

The last point is not the most important. About the synopsis, the lead is supposed to be a succinct summary of the wole article, "in a nutshell". So don't be afraid to be redundant there. On the other side, you probably shouldn't have redundancy between the character and synopsis sections (like the

2514:

Thanks, Koveras. My 'RhynCheck' is fairly simple... I basically check for a rendered site (meaning - it shows up) for every link. If there is an error in route it could lead to me mistakingly marking the link broken. (I'm not perfect and neither is my internet connection.) But I do try, and if

2359:

Okay, I gave a shot to putting in some of the changes. I only removed two of those comments that seem a bit flimsy; I think the article holds up without them. There's no need to mention the thought-provoking comment when discussing the themes (Though I suppose it could be put into Reception, but

2267:

Wait. The ritual succeeded just fine and that's why he died, which is what the plot summary article says too. Am I missing something here? Perhaps a better phrasing would be "Carrossea's memories are returned as well at his request, but he finds out that he died 12 years ago and dissappears" or

2236:

A large primary cast of distinctive characters is essential to the plot of Madlax, spiraling ever closer and evolving alongside the central ideas of the series, as well as, according to the composer Yuki Kajiura, serving as the milestones for Margaret Burton's (マーガレット・バートン, Māgaretto Bāton?) inner

1257:

Well, the source in N°09 has following statement: "Margaret deals with Maurice Lopez, a potential suitor who may well be more interested in her money than in her (Elenore to the rescue – and after seeing her deal with Maurice in very effective fashion, I've decided we need to see more of her)", in

1247:

I see the problem. It's probably best to avoid linking altogether for the ref N°09, as the link doesn't back up the claim. Just saying it's in the leaflet should be enough. As for refs, etc, I was thinking about the DVD's details, but the way you did it should be good (or it'll be quickly fixed at

1228:

They are print material, for sure. :) But full quotes will be very long (especially the production refs, since basically, they are almost entirely taken from the inlets). Any suggestions? Oh, and what other reference information can I add? I mean, they are simply paper pieces included into the DVD

927:

That's probably the better option for now. For the lead, I'm making an attempt to see how it flows. I know, and I think it's pretty well done; it's just that I think that the OR line isn't that well defined about in-fiction info; and that's one of the reason why articles about fiction try to be as

765:

Well, that's it with the sourcing and stuff. Now it needs some stylistic improvement and, perhaps, trimming, though as for the latter, ca. 8-9 kb are references rather than prose. Additionally, I'm not really content with the Staff and Cast sections - they can be more compact IMO, but I don't know

735:

I tagged the "war" section so you can get an idea. Maybe I got a little carried away, but that's what you face if you go FAC. The GAC people are generally a little cooler, but still.... About half of these can be sourced by citing episodes, but all the others (specially the last sentence, "one can

650:

In order to avoid edit conflicts, I suggest that we postpone the unsourced statement tagging until the very end, when I'm done with background section and chara article. In the meantime, you can look for those reviews and stuff. %) By "IRL" I meant "in real life", that is, everything regarding the

504:

Oh yeah, definitely. But you still have to say where you picked it from, and "promotionnal" it a bit tricky... Some say it's any kind of promotion, others that it's only what has been delivered in rights-free packages to news agencies... You probably won't have a problem with that one if you don't

1059:

Enlarging the pictures is not a problem: the trick is that their size is currently undefined, meaning that custom user settings for thumbsize are used by default. I have it set to 180px, what's yours? Because I feel it's a quite appropriate size... Though, for compatibility reasons, we definitely

1039:

Well, currently, we are fulfilling the norm "one-image-per-prose-page" with the exception of Production and Releases sections, where tables take their place, and References, so additional images are not mandatory... I wondered if we could move "Madlax and Vanessa" and the "Boxed set" to the left,

460:

This will definitely be a problem. Most of the comments you want to make about the series have to come from somebody else's mouth, so reviews are generally the best place to start. If it is out on DVD in the USA, you'll probably be able to find review (see anime on dvd, or others). I had the same

266:

Darwin and Hong Kong are actually trivial, and as such, they should be deleted, unless you are willing to fill a "setting" section. The reason why trivia sections aren't liked is that if it's trivial, it's probably irrelevant and unencyclopedic. If you want to keep it, Maneki Neko should move to

1671:

Congratulations, it passes! The only thing that I had a problem with was the table of voice actors- all of the major chars have it already listed under their descriptions, and the non-major chars aren't even listed, and thus don't need their voice actors listed either. I was going to put this

1452:

reliance would be frowned upon. My advices would be: 1) reduce the points where you need to rely on it to the minimum. This is good as it is by nature in-universe. 2) quote the sentences, or the exact sequence of action. This is good as it prevents you from taking too big "leaps", or to commit

97:

I just want to know how much 'spoilers' are allowed to spoil. See, the existing page just gives very non-spoiler-ish information about the characters, so I don't see why it is for the most part even marked 'spoilers'. We could always have a spoiler-specific section in which we say what MADLAX,

2297:

Anyway, I don't want to insert my own sophistry by randomly citing bad reviews, but I'll just say that lines like "Critics called Madlax "thought-provoking"" suggest a rather more positive response than I understand / hope happened, since critics have also called Madlax horrible and not

1368:

I am still working on the references, so GAC nomination will have to wait till then. Plus, I have already started planning the trimming part, so the whole thing will probably have to be move until after Christmas, at least. Don't worry, we are gonna get it thus far, sooner or later. :)

1863:

It's good, it's really good.... I played a little with the images in the production area to try to get rid of the white space in "franchise", but with no success. I would suggest filler text :D. I'm still looking into seeting that "hide" button on hidden by default, I'll get back on

2298:

thought-provoking too. Same with the "received only moderate (though generally approving) attention from the critics." Also, statements like "which lead some to name Madlax the better of the two" (referencing Noir) I think are best left out if included at all; it's a truism that

2156:

Not necessarily. You need references for claims that have to do with analysis or interpretation, such as "The story is primarily based on the assumption that everything flows from human thought". However statments on explicit events of the series don't need additional support, for

2250:

For sure, the series says she's a "kind killer" (not that her actions support this, but details), but not so sure on the "charismatic" part. Is she called that somewhere? I don't really recall her leading people, making tons of friends, and so on, but I could be off-base here.

387:

Sounds reasonable. Still, beware of not being too in-universe in your perspective. Articles about fiction should always be written from a "real world" perspective, and as such the place available to describe the background is limited. About at least half the article should be

2377:(which I know Decikiller worked on) has a handy template at the bottom linking to its related child articles. (While on the topic... Is there any need to say "Fictional setting of Madlax" in that article's title? I'd think that "Setting of Madlax" implies that just fine.) 894:

at the end, as it's the less accessible to someone with no knowledge. Also, I was checking your sources, and I'm not sure how far we'll go with some in-world info without being accused of OR. I say, as soon as we're done copyediting, let's put this through PR and see what

2142:

I see the problem with OoU writing in following: one has to find sources to every such statement. So can't just say "the storyline introduces something", you have to find a reliable source to back up that claim. =) Or that's just me having been made paranoid by Sidi...

1386:

up to GA, possibly FA. It has some good potential, sources, background, etc. Would you like to be a part of that? I guess it will wait until after the holidays anyway, but by then everyone will be more or less done with their "own" articles, so that could lead to good

1815:, so that this page doesn't get flooded). However, I don't think it's necessary to insert another image now that we have DVD and OST covers neighboring each other in the releases section... And we can always use The Bible cover, too, - at least, that'd be definite. -- 218:

should be sourced. I'll try and tag to make that clear. It is not really mandatory to cite the exact facts, but then you can't take many liberties. If you cite a sentence, you can sum up a reccuring idea; if you just cite the episode, you have to stick to the pure

428:: Well, they DO have a larger section in my translation, if that's what you mean... It contains their background, purpose, and general description. The only thing I can think that we can add are the names of the original owners (at the start of the series). 731:

Indeed. However, as for the former, I'm not sure whether it can be backed by an external source. Would the references to particular eps suffice? That subsection doesn't really contain any speculation, just summarizes the corresponding storylines. -Koveras

1486:

It's just that I'm worried about having too many headings. We can have either just one (which is bad, according to you) or four (which is bad IMO), or we could merge it all into one but then the section would become totally unstructured and illegible.

1049:

I see your point with the norm. How about enlarging them then? ;) It's really hard to make out the three personnas in this format. I took a look, and I like it better on the right. Seems more serious: it is at its place illustrating the text, not the

1763:? Also, I have my doubts about Releases section: maybe we should move the link to the episodes list up a section and then rename the "Bible" subsection to "Franchise" and make it a section itself? Sidi, I need your critical point of view! ^^ -- 74:

Not only is the third paragraph awful gramatically (the politician wants to kill himself by way of Madlax, if you don't get it), but it's the only reason the spoiler warning is in there. I would be much obliged if somebody could refactor it. -

2500:

ActiveAnime changed their URL format, apparently, and discarded the old one. Not a very professional thing to do, but who am I to have expectations... Fixed the links. Also, to my knowledge, the link to AnimeNfo in EL works perfectly. :)

175:: I agree that staff and distinctive features should be added, though I can't really think of what to write on the latter right now. :( As for the synopsis, we already have a full section about that, is it OK for the two to be redundant? 2241:

Okay, I don't have access to the insert that's referenced here, but isn't this a bit too much hyperbole? What does "spiraling ever closer and evolving along the central ideas of the series" even mean? I tried something a bit simpler.

2055:

I think the "plot" and "characters" sections need some copy-editing. I mean, they're written entirely in-universe. You should write in a way that constantly reminds the reader that you're talking about a fictional work. Take a look on

1453:

involuntary OR :). About the spoiling, most if not all should be in the plot section, that is already tagged. Use out of that should be very succinct, so as to avoid OR. All in all, I guess this will be part of the trimming down.

779:

I did some style corrections, but it'd be really appreciated if someone with a better eye for grammar than me looks through the article. I've also compacted (visually) the production section, but the article is still 59 kb big.

813:

The ANN reviews are good, you shouln't have trouble finding anything you want to say about the characters, the mood of the series, or that kind of stuff there. Also goo to explain and justify reception, ie comparison to Noir,

846:

Sidi, it's gonna take some time for me to read all those reviews, plus, I've just got assigned on a new job in real life, so it's probably gonna take some time to get all those statements sourced. Just so that you know. :)

917:

info in the lead, I can't really think of a way of moving it down without completely rewriting the whole section. And with OR of the in-world, well, I tried my best to find definite statements within the series itself...

928:

out-of-world as possible. Anyway, I'm just saying so you can be prepared.... But what you did is already remarkable, and I think we could remove about half the statements in there and still have a pretty good article. --

1873:

I've done some research on the issue with the hide button myself but to my current knowledge, it's not possible with the wiki-engine... However, that's not that bad, in fact: I've had a chance to view our article on a

108:

I'm currently working on the Russian article, which is well on its way to the featured pantheon right now. The election would probably be over in a couple of weeks, so I'm likely gonna expand this one afterwards. :)

2231:

Another comment while on the lead section: There's currently no reference to Yuki Kajiura. I don't think that I was the only person who watched the show mainly under the assurance of at least having awesome music.

446:

What is generally expected of a good anime article is to have a section for the critics and reception (sales, prizes, reviews...), and another one for the origins and inspiration (with citations from the authors).

2125:

In regard to out-of-unvierse, I'd rather see it used only where appropriate as opposed to using it as seasoning. However, a copy-edit by two or three editors to weed out lingering deficiencies is a good idea. —

524:

Basically that's it. I know you didn't ask for a full peer review, and I hope you don't take that badly, but it's always good to have these things lined up from the start. That's a great article anyway, keep it

317:

Seven main characters seems a lot, but then again I didn't see it. Mentioned means that they appear in the article. If you are going to have a characters article, the info in the main should be scarce. Look at

168:

The lead is very short. It should detail the production staff, a short synopsis (or theme, or description) of the plot, and any simple detail that explain if there is anything really distinctive in this anime.

1773:

About the TOC, i'm not sure. It'd be nice at the bottom of the lead, but right there in the middle, it seems a bit weird. How about letting it stay at the bottom, but hidden by default? It would fit perfectly.

301:

The characters section is too long. Consider having a separate article in the future for all the detailed characters descriptions, but for now only the main characters should be mentioned in the main article.

986:

That's where I wanted to put it, indeed... However, AnimeReactor is not a very official organization and their goals are a possible copyright violation... In other words, is it PC to link to their site? %)

1030:

the article very professionnal-looking the way it is; maybe you could still add a few more, or enlarge some? Then you would have a good reason to have some on the left, so as not to cram the right side!--

1188:

That should do it. I tweaked a little the first sentance to stick closer to the ref, but couldn't find the second. It leads to the list of DVDs, maybe you should make it point directly to one of them?--

88:

one else has attacked Madlax is bcs most of the peeps dindt see some ideas reflected in the argument and characters, anti-war followers (I am not one of them) will find Madlax really dissapointment) --

1477:

Merry christmas Koveras!! Just pointing out that "Shoujo-Ai" stands as a single sub-section, and that's not good. You need to either merge it with the other themes, or revive the other sub-sections.--

1411:

Btw, Sidi, there is something I wanted to ask you: you said above that "it's OK to cite the anime, as long as you give a complete sentence, and advise the episode". However, on the peer review page,

1382:

had 8 FAs, and I'd really like to see the anime & manga project get there. I'm not counting the lists as FAs, so that leaves Madlax, Lain and Excel Saga for now. There is some talk about getting

1563: 651:

reception, production, theme, and everything. It'd probably be the best if you simply list everything notable that you can find here and we'll see how we can incorporate it all in the article. --

1878:

screen and saw that with the TOC hidden, the infobox totally messes up the images in the chara section. :) As for the filler text, wouldn't that contradict the "being crisp and concise" policy (

1019:

Right now, all pictures (except in the characters section) are right-aligned which is a bit dull... Maybe we should left-align some? The problem is, I lack artistic taste to do that alone... --

588:

Start a character list article and move the entire descriptions there. Reduce the chara section to seven brief, non-spoilorific descriptions with screenshots and voice actors (no Mashimo Menu).

1833:

But the question remains: do we really need the third picture in there? :) There is, of course a possibility of left-aligning the OST cover, then the third image would fit in, as well... --

2219:

I saw this article on the FAC list. Made a few minor changes (also, suite 101 . com is apparently on the spamblacklist, so that ref may have to be messed with), but some other comments:

327:

good solution, but the article should still be understandable in itself. Oh, and you'll need the voice actors. There's a template named "anime voice" for that, that gives great results.--

205:

Most of the article is unsourced. You will need sources for almost every affirmation. Remember it's OK to cite the anime, as long as you give a complete sentence, and advise the episode.

2515:

the link turns out not to be broken, my apologies! I usually double check broken links for confirmation. It could also have been a server side glitch... Glad to hear it's working!

1144:

the section explaining how a vast core cast is an important part of the series' setting, or something of the like? It would also help with the anti-list crusaders. Nice catch anyway.--

718:

When you create the characters page, you will want to reduce the info on each character to a minimum. Basic info, place in the series, distinctive capacities, maybe key relationships.

1695:

YAAAY! Congrats Koveras, really grat work. I'd personally go with a staff photo if you could find it (about below), but if you don't a staff table is perfectly fine. Cheers again!

2438:

I understand. I may not be able to find it, it could be me drawing my own conclusions. And I know Orignal Research is not premitted by Wiki. But glad to see this is a FA. --

360:: I have already remarked that the pictures will be added once the translation is copied over to the article. :) I have them all nice and properly tagged on the Rupedia. %) 941:

want to remove any statements because I want a complete article, not simply a featured article, if you understand what I mean. :) Btw, how about copyediting the rest? %) --

1928:, it's only the last two parts. In any case, my proposal would be to return the quotation marks, so that separating the formal data and the quote itself becomes easier. -- 1080:

with a nigh-official status filled with Madlax images. ^^; I'll replace those lousy screenshots in the chara section with the pictures from the website later today... --

1802:

The main reason I was thinking about dolls is to have a picture in the "Franchise" part, actuelly ;D. I've found one in google images, so they must exist somewhere.--

1776:

Now, about the images, here's what I'd do: move the ratings to "reception", and the DVD boxed set to the "Releases". Releases, Franchise and Music could all be moved

881:. I have also finished reading and analyzing the reviews (the ones I got listed in there), but I currently have little to no time to thoroughly source anything. :( -- 2294:

few malcontents, or alternately mostly cite the bad reviews and make it look awful with only a few people who enjoyed it. Not sure if there's a good way around it.

2285:

Okay, yes, this is an encyclopedia, but this phrasing is entirely too sterile. How about "while drunk" with the blue link still heading to alcohol intoxication?

1783:

I would also get a picture of an OS uploaded and add it to the "Music" section. I would also look for a ord about Madlax dolls, etc. for the Franchise section.--

2428:

That is a very interesting idea and may even be the case but without backup, we can't put it into the article, seeing how it is nominated for FA right now... --

1549:

a featured article, it's a high praise, thank you. ^^ Btw, congratulations with that. :) What do we do now? Technically, how do we nominate this one for GAC? --

2390:

Please use the FAC page to your advantage. You can get more feedback there, and the FAC director will notice comments on the FAC page (not on the talkpage). —

2369:

Also: I put back the "See alsos" to the child articles that Decikiller removed. Since they are very clearly spin-off articles, I think it's appropriate; the

627:

Check all the titles and names for their consistency with the official translation (this should be done after everything else, to ensure overall consistency)

491:

If you don't want to get bugged by the image nazis out there, you should specify where you got the image madlaw.jpg, and justify that it's been released.

2302:

people will think Madlax is better than Noir, but I would be completely shocked if it was anything approaching a majority, which this statement implies.

1435:

I think the article is fairly complete. I'm changing the assessment to A-class for now. If anyone disagrees then feel free to move it back to B-class. --

1575:

Ok... It's not "long", right? I mean, although it appears 43 kB big, the "main article prose" is only 24 thousand characters long (about 3800 words). --

1468:. Once you know what issues you want, go for it! I'll have a look at your use of primary citations and let you know where I think it could be avoided.-- 728:

I see the references are on good way! You'll still have to find something to back the "shoujo-ai" and "war" parts, or it will pass as fan speculation.

1197:

Well, the problem is, there are several inlets referenced in the article, each coming with another volume. I've had the scans of the leaflets posted

188:

Oh, now I get what the "lead" is about. %) Ok, I'll see what I can come up with. Btw, the 98% thing is only mentioned once in the translation. :P --

1698: 1093: 164:

A few points worth mentionning, as you said the article went FA on the Russian Wiki and I expect you will want to have this one recognised also.

646:

It seems we edit at the same hours! I've had an edit conflict with your last one. :) Generally I agree with your to-do. What do you mean by IRL?

147:

Thank you. :) As for yuri, there are many reviews out there that list MADLAX as a shoujo-ai anime, so I decided that it's worth explaining. :) --

661:

Here is my original text: This is impressive! That's a lot of work you're putting in here. I'll start a new list to make conversation easier:

890:

I've begun copyediting for grammar, style, etc. It's amazing how fast you got this up. In the lead, it might be good to place the part about

836:

Ok, I'm done with the general restructuring. I'll need more finishing touches, but I'll leave that for tomorrow. Sidi, it's your turn. :) --

422:

I don't know about the anime, but the holy books seem to deserve an actual section, with phrases and descriptions, instead of just a table.

2112:, it's imposible to write the whole thing from an out-of-universe perspective, but one or two sentences per paragraph should do the trick. 2337:

I just had enormous trouble summarizing in one sentence what exactly happened to Carrossea. :) You may gave better luck, so go ahead. ^^

2175:

Of course, a well written plot summary needs both, an analysis of the storyline and some description of the main scenes (plot points).

1559: 1780:"Production", as sub-parts. This could also apply to plot, characters and themes in a part of their own, but I see it less necessary. 698:

Well, the the Excel Saga has had trice as much time to become popular and find a cultural place to hold. ^^ I bet, if we wrote about

2259:

Isn't she more an agent of the G-S government? Which, granted, is controlled by Enfant, but I don't think she knows that at first.

1921: 124:

Ok, folks, I've completed the translation of the Russian article that is currently featured on Rupedia. The text is available in

615:

Find a whole bunch of reviews to support the IRL statements (I'm afraid, SidiLemine will have to do the searching part, as well)

1248:

FAC anyway). If someone expresses doubts, you can still send him to the scans on the beetrain forum, as an "off-record" ref. --

2318:

OK, we can remove that, I just wanted to explain HOW it is different from Noir and didn't find anything better in the reviews.

2277:

clashing powers with organized armies, while he was going for something more like "worldwide murderous madness and disorder."

2551:

This goes to everyone who participated in the improvement of this article: does anyone feel up to translating the thing into

1422: 544:

I'll wait until you finish to tag for facts and to start looking for reviews, etc. Let me know when you're ready. Cheers!--

2346:

Well, generalized statements are a headache, I agree. I feel bad about removing them though... Do we really have to? %) --

1962:

Please, don't take it personally! We all know that you wanted to improve the article. :) And so did we, that is all. ^^ --

378:

The weapons section is generally frowned upon as irrelevant, but I love the format you gave to this one, so I'll refrain.

977:

Yes, I think it would fit pretty nicely at the end of the "reception" section, as you already talk about the OST there.--

2281:

like Margaret and Madlax's connection to each other, were invented by Kuroda and him in a state of alcohol intoxication.

1383: 583:

With the Background section done, rm the Synopsis section by moving the remaining story info to the "lead" (I'll do it)

755:

This is getting very good. It will soon be the moment to put it up for peer review, and then, if all goes well, GAC!--

686:

I guess the ANN ref is OK! Even if it can be edited by any logged contributor, it is still on a recognised site, so...

860:

Congratulations! Hope you like it. I'll try and do some sourcing when I get time. Real life is a pain in the ass ;)--

600:

Get rid of the remaining trivia (I'll do it myself as soon as the Background section and the chara article are there)

1710: 1105: 1465: 38: 996:

You're right. Not only is it officially a site dedicated to copyvio, but the link you have is to a forum, against

1425:) expressed concerns "about the reliance on the primary source for citations". How should I see that point? %) -- 1238:

Well, I've expanded the references as I saw suitable, couldn't figure out the thing with the quotes, though... --

1119: 913:

In fact, I had my doubts about Hong Kong, too, so I prefer to have it removed as insufficiently sourced. As for

904:

You didn't justify how the scenes of Garthz-Sonica are related to Hong Kong. Can you find a source for that?--

877:

I've formatted the reference sites using the cite templates, so if you decide to do some sourcing, check out

501:. I can even get the page number if necessary... Low-res promotional artworks *are* fair-use, aren't they?.. 465:; you might have a look and pick from the references at the bottom, there's a dozen or so DVD review sites.-- 281: 2057: 1983:

I feel it is more appropriate to take the sentences verbatim when quoting something. That is why I added a "

1941: 1457: 1305: 566:

Start the Background section (I'll do it, eventually). Background comes before the Story and should contain:

462: 323: 89: 801: 2415: 1915: 99: 2439: 2419: 1729:

I don't think a photo is possible - in fact, I've had trouble getting a single picture of Mashimo. %) --

1321: 1296: 139: 1954: 1911: 1760: 1461: 1175: 878: 766:

how to do that. Any ideas? Perhaps, there is some smart film template I have to yet learn about... --

125: 1590: 1567: 1436: 807: 535:

No-no, I was considering to nominate it for a peer review anyway, so I'm glad you volunteered. ^^ --

2395: 2131: 2315:

I see... Well, I didn't know that with S101 and it worked just fine with me... Should I remove it?

2374: 1416: 817:

It seems like there's staff commentaries in the DVD extras. If you have them, that's a gold mine.

2060:

for ideas. Make use of words like depicted, portrayed, introduced. Here some examples from Lain:

620:

Find corresponding scenes, dialogues and episodes for the in-universe statements (I can do that)

267:

characters, and Hitomi no Katera to "songs". Red shoes will be very hard to pass as not being

253:

The trivia section is actaully very interesting, compared to most trivia section; however, it

2223:

pays much attention to the interaction of various factions rather than individual characters,

1953:

I'm fine with the return to the previous quotation form. I'm sorry to have wasted your time.

705:

Sure. But you have to remember that it is easier to pass a small, well-balanced article (see

593:

Wikilink every character name in the main article to the character (sub-)section in the list.

280:

I don't know how we could fit Maneki Neko to the characters, but as for the red shoes, would

1379: 1077: 699: 2331:

Should I replace "charismatic" with "beautiful"? ^^ Dozens of plot intros use that word. %)

1672:

article on hold for that, but since it was just one thing, I just edited it out myself. --

2084:

You may also switch POV, writing from the audience perspective, or from the series itself:

1338: 497:: You mean, the top-right corner one? I think that's from AniDB, but originally it was in 396:. Like I said: inspirations, etc. If you put too much in-world stuff, you'll get sacked.-- 1198: 1706: 1101: 257:

be merged with the rest of the article. There's a war going on against trivia sections.

2465: 2392: 2128: 1812: 964: 739:

IRL: see above, the very first reply in this subsection. %) I'll look into the rest. --

233: 229: 76: 1895:

So, should we try our luck with FAC or first run the article through another PR? : -->

2461: 2457: 2378: 2303: 2176: 2113: 2109: 2002: 1945: 1879: 1824:

Mmmmmh.... Images. :) The bible was going to be my next proposal for the franchise.--

1412: 2263:

Failing to complete the proper ritual, Carrossea, who has been supporting her, dies,

1811:

I've started researching the matter and found some material already (I've posted it

2556: 2533: 2502: 2469: 2429: 2347: 2201: 2144: 2028: 2011: 1988: 1963: 1929: 1897: 1883: 1854: 1834: 1816: 1794: 1764: 1750: 1730: 1683: 1576: 1550: 1527: 1507: 1488: 1426: 1398: 1370: 1344: 1279: 1259: 1239: 1230: 1216: 1202: 1179: 1154: 1135: 1126: 1081: 1061: 1041: 1020: 997: 988: 968: 942: 919: 882: 848: 837: 781: 767: 740: 652: 633: 536: 509: 475: 406: 338: 285: 268: 237: 189: 148: 129: 110: 1853:

I've updated my sandbox with what I've found thus far. Any more suggestions? :) --

1358:

better idea what to work on. I don't think more copyediting is needed right now.--

691:

About going to FAC: as far as I know, there has ever been only one anime to pass:

1040:

actually, but I wasn't sure. Can you preview it and then tell me your opinion? --

2516: 2482: 2197: 1212: 47: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

17: 2311:

Finally we have someone here who actually watched Madlax. %) Replies in order:

138:

Looks fantastic! :P Thank you for mentioning the yuri that is suggested in it.

1673: 692: 2552: 2453: 2038: 1865: 1825: 1803: 1784: 1702: 1613: 1537: 1498: 1478: 1469: 1388: 1359: 1249: 1220: 1189: 1145: 1097: 1051: 1031: 1001: 978: 929: 905: 896: 861: 827: 756: 545: 526: 466: 432: 397: 364: 328: 272: 220: 180: 2532:

No offense meant. :) AnimeNfo tends to have outages from time to time. :) --

2496:'External Links: MadLax in AnimeNfo... (Unsure of Marking Strategy Here...) 1278:

So, should I play over the changes from my sandbox to the actual article? --

706: 610:

Locate all statements in need to be sourced (SidiLemine agreed to help here)

2559: 2536: 2519: 2505: 2485: 2472: 2442: 2432: 2422: 2399: 2381: 2350: 2306: 2204: 2179: 2147: 2135: 2116: 2041: 2031: 2014: 2005: 1991: 1966: 1957: 1948: 1932: 1900: 1886: 1868: 1857: 1837: 1828: 1819: 1806: 1797: 1787: 1767: 1753: 1733: 1714: 1686: 1676: 1616: 1593: 1579: 1570: 1553: 1540: 1530: 1510: 1501: 1491: 1481: 1472: 1439: 1429: 1401: 1391: 1373: 1362: 1347: 1282: 1262: 1252: 1242: 1233: 1223: 1205: 1192: 1182: 1157: 1148: 1138: 1129: 1109: 1084: 1064: 1054: 1044: 1034: 1023: 1004: 991: 981: 971: 945: 932: 922: 908: 899: 885: 864: 851: 840: 830: 784: 770: 759: 743: 655: 636: 548: 539: 529: 512: 478: 469: 435: 409: 400: 367: 341: 331: 288: 275: 240: 223: 192: 183: 151: 142: 132: 113: 102: 92: 2037:

More than ready if you ask me.... That's way over PR level. Go for it! --

1875: 1313: 1090:

That's pretty good character pics. Any idea of the status (re fair use)?

823:

Note that ANN have an article for each DVD, plus one in the encyclopedia.

680: 319: 310: 2340:

Again, trouble with finding words. :) English isn't my mother tongue. :)

2321:

Ouch, sorry about forgetting Kajiura, my bad. :( I'll do something ASAP.

271:, so they'll probably have to go, unless you find a supporting source.-- 2370: 2075:"The storyline introduces such a system with the Schumann resonance..." 1258:

other words, a brief summary of the episode on a secondary source... --

561:

Since the section has turned a bit illegible, here is the to-do list:

2196:

is as much as I could do without making the sections BIG... Will one

826:

As you said, I'll wait until you finish before tagging any further.--

967:

from AnimeReactor community... Is it OK to add it to the article? --

2324:

That with the "spiraling" was reworded by Sidi, originally it read

2093:"the viewer sees Lain realizing, after much introspection, that..." 1302:

template. Should we format the episode refs with it? ^^ Like this:

2411: 2237:

growth, one of the main topics of the show (see Themes of Madlax).

571:

Descriptions of Nafrece, Gazth-Sonika, Bookwald Industries, Enfant

1940:

I agree with Koveras. Quotation marks should be used, as seen in

1612:

This article has been listed for GAC since the 14th of January.--

2096:"The last scenes feature her erasing everything connected to..." 2452:

The article has been promoted! A big thanks to all, especially

679:

About citing the episodes: Yes, that's what I meant. Check out

2418:

just a thought, I have nothing to really back this up with. --

1998: 1984: 1925: 1759:

With the previous issue solved, how about moving the TOC like

1497:

at the beginning of the sub-sections. Hope this makes sense.--

25: 2410:

Is it possible that Margaret Madlax and Letita all represent

2246:

Madlax (マドラックス, Madorakkusu?), a charismatic kind young woman

1564:

Knowledge:WikiProject Anime and manga/Good article candidates

1060:

need to make the images size constant, you are right here. --

2192:

Sheesh, I've been trying to reword it for over 36 hours but

2255:

Another agent of Enfant later in the series is Limelda Jorg

1749:

will become a separate section instead of a subsection. --

1201:

but I wasn't sure whether it's OK to link to a forum... --

2334:

Limelda works for Carrossea as early as in episode 5. :)

820:

I see you've got the Newtipe interview, that's good too.

457:

artbook and it has never been translated from Japanese.

2343:

Why not? "While drunk" may sound encyclopedic enough...

2325: 2193: 2099:"The series sees him trying to convince her through..." 2072:"She is first depicted as a shy junior high school..." 1174:

I have "come up with something". Can you please take a

576:

Similarities with our world including the weapons table

228:

I still don't really get it. :( Should I do it like in

2069:"Eiri Masami is introduced as the project director..." 2373:

FA does the same thing with its child articles, and

354:

Try adding pictures, main characters would be good.

2272:Monday commences a ritual to start a new world war 721:Yeah, that's what I had in mind, too. :) -Koveras 709:) than a big one with only in-universe info.-Sidi 1997:Ops, sorry about that. I really didn't see the 1448:Well... Monocrat is probably right in thinking 605:Add Staff and production section after Releases 810:: 9 commercial reviews, probably 2 or 3 usefl. 672:There is still more to come, I guess. -Koveras 98:Margaret and Laticia actually ARE, I dunno. -- 1589:) it reports 29.21 kB, so it isn't "long". -- 1378:I'm glad to hear that. I just found out that 8: 2488:Has checked this page and found there to be 1545:Coming from someone who succeeded in making 1312:. Episode 01. 2004-04-05. 3:23 minutes in. 1153:Uh, I'll try to come up with something... -- 632:Well, that's the general plan, I suppose. -- 2200:-breaking sentence per paragraph do? :-/ -- 1987:" after that, in case someone missed it. -- 1076:Hey, guess what I have found! %) A whole 702:, it'd've been slightly easier. -Koveras 963:I've just noticed that Madlax OST got a 1334: 1330: 1319: 1000:. Too bad, we'll have to do without.-- 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1624:I graded this article on 7 criteria: 7: 1910:Regarding the recent formatting by 1793:to ask around on the fan forums. -- 1456:About the sources, check this out: 1134:Ok, I'm done. What do you think? -- 284:trivia page qualify as reliable? -- 214:Basically, in a perfect wikiworld, 1560:Knowledge:Good articles/Candidates 24: 2010:Good, and apology accepted. :) -- 2289:The themes and reception section 431:That probably won't be needed.-- 29: 2492:dead links... ref. ^ (sect. ^) 1536:Brilliant. Simply brilliant.-- 1526:Well, how does it look now? -- 1211:material, but it's definitely 1: 2015:06:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 2006:05:51, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 2001:mark. OK, it's reverted now. 1992:15:23, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 1967:06:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 1958:22:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 1949:00:57, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 1933:10:09, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 1901:13:22, 16 February 2007 (UTC) 1887:10:33, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 1869:09:56, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 1858:08:49, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 1838:10:09, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 1829:08:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 1562:and then copy the listing to 1511:15:01, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 1502:14:42, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 1492:12:04, 25 December 2006 (UTC) 1482:11:58, 25 December 2006 (UTC) 1473:13:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC) 1440:07:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC) 1430:13:58, 17 December 2006 (UTC) 1402:14:38, 16 December 2006 (UTC) 1392:14:21, 16 December 2006 (UTC) 1374:13:10, 16 December 2006 (UTC) 1363:12:33, 16 December 2006 (UTC) 1263:15:04, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1253:11:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1243:23:18, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 1234:14:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 1224:13:50, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 1206:12:10, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 1193:10:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 1183:20:10, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 1158:20:05, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 1149:19:28, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 1139:16:13, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 1130:12:01, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 1110:10:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 1085:06:17, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 946:07:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 933:18:15, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 923:16:46, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 909:13:23, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 900:13:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 785:20:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 771:11:19, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 2560:21:17, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 1820:21:06, 9 February 2007 (UTC) 1807:17:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC) 1798:10:21, 9 February 2007 (UTC) 1788:09:35, 9 February 2007 (UTC) 1768:15:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 1754:08:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 1734:11:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 1715:10:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 1687:08:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 1677:04:55, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 1617:09:15, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 1594:01:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 1580:11:50, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 1571:11:28, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 1554:09:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 1541:13:15, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1531:10:43, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1065:16:35, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 1055:16:07, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 1045:15:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 1035:14:11, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 1024:13:33, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 1005:13:48, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 992:12:27, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 982:11:12, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 972:09:21, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 937:I think so. The point is, I 886:17:19, 8 November 2006 (UTC) 865:10:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 852:18:43, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 841:18:04, 3 November 2006 (UTC) 831:12:56, 3 November 2006 (UTC) 760:11:21, 3 November 2006 (UTC) 744:11:47, 3 November 2006 (UTC) 656:10:51, 3 November 2006 (UTC) 637:09:52, 3 November 2006 (UTC) 549:14:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 540:11:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 530:10:44, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 513:17:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 479:17:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 470:14:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 436:14:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 410:17:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 401:14:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 368:14:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 342:17:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 332:14:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 289:17:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 276:14:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 241:17:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 224:14:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 193:17:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 184:14:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 152:08:35, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 143:18:23, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 133:16:34, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 114:04:46, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 1558:Follow the instructions on 802:Volume 1 at Rotten tomatoes 322:for a good example, and at 2575: 2400:00:17, 17 April 2007 (UTC) 2382:23:40, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2351:05:31, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 2307:21:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 2205:19:52, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 2180:06:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 2148:06:04, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 2136:05:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 2117:05:35, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 1506:I'll see what I can do. -- 1466:User:Shiroi Hane/Resources 804:: links to 4 good reviews. 798:Here are a few nice links: 508:And if I eventually do? -- 474:I'll look them through. -- 405:I'll keep that in mind. -- 79:03:00, Aug 25, 2004 (UTC) 2537:09:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2520:04:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2506:07:11, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 2486:02:06, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 2443:16:11, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 2215:A few comments/questions. 2042:08:54, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 2032:21:15, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 1348:13:53, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 1292:I've just discovered the 1283:10:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 683:for another good example. 394:about what's in the anime 103:07:54, 14 June 2006 (UTC) 2473:07:00, 1 June 2007 (UTC) 2433:06:58, 31 May 2007 (UTC) 2423:03:04, 31 May 2007 (UTC) 1621:And now it is reviewed! 93:02:33, 21 May 2006 (UTC) 2406:Psychology Connections? 1458:User:GunnarRene/Sources 1384:Neon Genesis Evangelion 463:Serial Experiments Lain 324:Serial Experiments Lain 2416:Id, ego, and super-ego 83:Perhaps more spoilers? 1701:comment was added by 1096:comment was added by 42:of past discussions. 2478:RhynCheck Dead Links 1634:Factually accurate: 1462:User:Kunzite/newtype 965:"Best of 2004" award 505:want to get to FAC. 2414:'s theories of the 1682:Thanks a lot. ^^ -- 1646:Neutrally written: 461:problem working on 120:Russian translation 2375:Final Fantasy VIII 1329:Unknown parameter 1125:, naturally. :D -- 363:Good for you! :)-- 2027:Just asking... -- 1920: 1718: 1658:Well-referenced: 1421: 1306:Gun Dance ~dance~ 1120:character-artwork 1113: 269:Original Research 90:General Kane Nash 67: 66: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2566: 1918: 1696: 1667: 1661: 1655: 1649: 1643: 1637: 1631: 1588: 1419: 1342: 1336: 1332: 1327: 1325: 1317: 1301: 1295: 1124: 1118: 1091: 392:, as opposed to 140:Kyaa the Catlord 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2574: 2573: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2549: 2480: 2450: 2408: 2217: 2050: 2025: 1981: 1944:which is a FA. 1908: 1746: 1697:—The preceding 1665: 1659: 1653: 1647: 1641: 1635: 1629: 1610: 1585: 1355: 1328: 1318: 1303: 1299: 1293: 1290: 1229:packaging... -- 1172: 1122: 1116: 1092:—The preceding 1017: 795: 644: 559: 390:baout the anime 162: 122: 85: 72: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2572: 2570: 2553:Simple English 2548: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2509: 2508: 2479: 2476: 2449: 2446: 2436: 2435: 2407: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2354: 2353: 2344: 2341: 2338: 2335: 2332: 2329: 2322: 2319: 2316: 2291: 2290: 2283: 2282: 2274: 2273: 2265: 2264: 2257: 2256: 2248: 2247: 2239: 2238: 2225: 2224: 2216: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2151: 2150: 2139: 2138: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2097: 2094: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2073: 2070: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2049: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2024: 2023:Ready for FAC? 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 1980: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1907: 1904: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1781: 1774: 1757: 1745: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1690: 1689: 1669: 1668: 1662: 1656: 1650: 1644: 1638: 1632: 1628:Well-written: 1609: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1454: 1443: 1442: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1354: 1353:Ready for GAC? 1351: 1335:|episode-link= 1289: 1286: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1236: 1171: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1132: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1016: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 950: 949: 948: 902: 870: 869: 868: 867: 855: 854: 834: 833: 824: 821: 818: 815: 811: 805: 799: 794: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 774: 773: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 725: 724: 723: 722: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 688: 687: 684: 676: 675: 674: 673: 659: 658: 643: 640: 630: 629: 624: 623: 622: 617: 607: 602: 597: 596: 595: 585: 580: 579: 578: 573: 558: 555: 554: 553: 552: 551: 522: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 488: 487: 486: 485: 484: 483: 482: 481: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 438: 419: 418: 417: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 351: 350: 349: 348: 347: 346: 345: 344: 298: 297: 296: 295: 294: 293: 292: 291: 250: 249: 248: 247: 246: 245: 244: 243: 234:Simoun (mecha) 230:Simoun (anime) 202: 201: 200: 199: 198: 197: 196: 195: 161: 158: 157: 156: 155: 154: 121: 118: 117: 116: 100:59.167.107.150 84: 81: 71: 68: 65: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2571: 2562: 2561: 2558: 2554: 2546: 2538: 2535: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2521: 2518: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2507: 2504: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2484: 2477: 2475: 2474: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2455: 2447: 2445: 2444: 2441: 2440:24.10.234.104 2434: 2431: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2421: 2420:67.177.36.225 2417: 2413: 2405: 2401: 2398: 2397: 2394: 2389: 2388: 2383: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2352: 2349: 2345: 2342: 2339: 2336: 2333: 2330: 2327: 2323: 2320: 2317: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2309: 2308: 2305: 2301: 2295: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2229: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2214: 2206: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2181: 2178: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2149: 2146: 2141: 2140: 2137: 2134: 2133: 2130: 2124: 2123: 2118: 2115: 2111: 2108:As stated by 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2098: 2095: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2074: 2071: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2059: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2040: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2030: 2022: 2016: 2013: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1990: 1986: 1978: 1968: 1965: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1956: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1917: 1913: 1905: 1903: 1902: 1899: 1888: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1867: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1856: 1839: 1836: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1827: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1805: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1796: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1786: 1782: 1779: 1775: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1766: 1762: 1756: 1755: 1752: 1743: 1735: 1732: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1688: 1685: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1675: 1663: 1657: 1651: 1645: 1639: 1633: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1622: 1619: 1618: 1615: 1607: 1595: 1592: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1578: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1539: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1529: 1512: 1509: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1500: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1490: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1480: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1441: 1438: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1428: 1424: 1418: 1414: 1403: 1400: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1390: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1372: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1361: 1352: 1350: 1349: 1346: 1340: 1331:|episodelink= 1323: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1298: 1287: 1285: 1284: 1281: 1264: 1261: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1251: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1241: 1237: 1235: 1232: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1191: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1181: 1177: 1169: 1159: 1156: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1147: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1137: 1133: 1131: 1128: 1121: 1115: 1114: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1083: 1079: 1066: 1063: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1053: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1043: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1033: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1022: 1014: 1006: 1003: 999: 995: 994: 993: 990: 985: 984: 983: 980: 976: 975: 974: 973: 970: 966: 947: 944: 940: 936: 935: 934: 931: 926: 925: 924: 921: 916: 912: 911: 910: 907: 903: 901: 898: 893: 889: 888: 887: 884: 880: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 871: 866: 863: 859: 858: 857: 856: 853: 850: 845: 844: 843: 842: 839: 832: 829: 825: 822: 819: 816: 812: 809: 806: 803: 800: 797: 796: 792: 786: 783: 778: 777: 776: 775: 772: 769: 764: 763: 762: 761: 758: 745: 742: 738: 737: 734: 733: 730: 729: 727: 726: 720: 719: 717: 716: 708: 704: 703: 701: 697: 696: 694: 690: 689: 685: 682: 678: 677: 671: 670: 668: 664: 663: 662: 657: 654: 649: 648: 647: 641: 639: 638: 635: 628: 625: 621: 618: 616: 613: 612: 611: 608: 606: 603: 601: 598: 594: 591: 590: 589: 586: 584: 581: 577: 574: 572: 569: 568: 567: 564: 563: 562: 556: 550: 547: 543: 542: 541: 538: 534: 533: 532: 531: 528: 514: 511: 507: 506: 503: 502: 500: 496: 493: 492: 490: 489: 480: 477: 473: 472: 471: 468: 464: 459: 458: 456: 452: 449: 448: 445: 444: 437: 434: 430: 429: 427: 424: 423: 421: 420: 411: 408: 404: 403: 402: 399: 395: 391: 386: 385: 383: 380: 379: 377: 376: 369: 366: 362: 361: 359: 356: 355: 353: 352: 343: 340: 335: 334: 333: 330: 325: 321: 316: 315: 313: 312: 307: 304: 303: 300: 299: 290: 287: 283: 279: 278: 277: 274: 270: 265: 264: 262: 259: 258: 256: 252: 251: 242: 239: 235: 231: 227: 226: 225: 222: 217: 213: 212: 210: 207: 206: 204: 203: 194: 191: 187: 186: 185: 182: 179:98% thing).-- 177: 176: 174: 171: 170: 167: 166: 165: 159: 153: 150: 146: 145: 144: 141: 137: 136: 135: 134: 131: 127: 119: 115: 112: 107: 106: 105: 104: 101: 95: 94: 91: 82: 80: 78: 70:older entries 69: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2550: 2493: 2489: 2481: 2451: 2437: 2409: 2391: 2310: 2299: 2296: 2292: 2284: 2275: 2266: 2258: 2249: 2240: 2230: 2226: 2218: 2127: 2026: 1982: 1909: 1894: 1852: 1777: 1758: 1747: 1670: 1623: 1620: 1611: 1586:Tools -: --> 1584:In Firefox ( 1546: 1525: 1449: 1410: 1356: 1337:suggested) ( 1322:cite episode 1309: 1297:cite episode 1291: 1277: 1173: 1075: 1018: 962: 938: 914: 891: 835: 754: 669:better now. 666: 665:The lead is 660: 645: 631: 626: 619: 614: 609: 604: 599: 592: 587: 582: 575: 570: 565: 560: 523: 498: 494: 454: 450: 425: 393: 389: 381: 357: 314:articles... 309: 305: 260: 254: 215: 208: 172: 163: 123: 96: 86: 73: 60: 43: 37: 2198:fourth wall 2048:In-universe 1387:teamwork.-- 1050:opposite.-- 337:section. -- 160:Improvement 36:This is an 18:Talk:Madlax 2494:&& 2454:SidiLemine 2268:the like? 2039:SidiLemine 1955:Geuiwogbil 1912:Geuiwogbil 1906:Quotations 1866:SidiLemine 1826:SidiLemine 1804:SidiLemine 1785:SidiLemine 1744:Condensing 1614:SidiLemine 1538:SidiLemine 1499:SidiLemine 1479:SidiLemine 1470:SidiLemine 1389:SidiLemine 1360:SidiLemine 1250:SidiLemine 1221:SidiLemine 1190:SidiLemine 1170:Characters 1146:SidiLemine 1052:SidiLemine 1032:SidiLemine 1002:SidiLemine 979:SidiLemine 930:SidiLemine 906:SidiLemine 897:SidiLemine 895:happens!-- 879:my sandbox 862:SidiLemine 828:SidiLemine 757:SidiLemine 693:Excel Saga 546:SidiLemine 527:SidiLemine 467:SidiLemine 433:SidiLemine 398:SidiLemine 365:SidiLemine 329:SidiLemine 273:SidiLemine 232:or in the 221:SidiLemine 216:everything 181:SidiLemine 126:my sandbox 2466:Deckiller 1979:Decapping 1882:)? ^^; -- 1591:Squilibob 1587:Page info 1568:Squilibob 1437:Squilibob 1380:WP:COMICS 1333:ignored ( 1288:Citations 707:Believers 499:The Bible 455:The Bible 61:Archive 1 2462:Kazu-kun 2458:SnowFire 2379:SnowFire 2304:SnowFire 2177:Kazu-kun 2157:example: 2114:Kazu-kun 2003:Kazu-kun 1946:Kazu-kun 1922:contribs 1896:_< -- 1876:wide XGA 1711:contribs 1699:unsigned 1664:Images: 1652:Stable: 1423:contribs 1413:Monocrat 1314:TV Tokyo 1106:contribs 1094:unsigned 1015:Pictures 808:Volume 2 681:Planetes 557:Planning 320:Planetes 311:Exosquad 219:facts.-- 77:glasnost 2557:Koveras 2534:Koveras 2503:Koveras 2470:Koveras 2468:. ^^ -- 2430:Koveras 2393:Deckill 2371:Saffron 2348:Koveras 2202:Koveras 2145:Koveras 2129:Deckill 2029:Koveras 2012:Koveras 1989:Koveras 1964:Koveras 1930:Koveras 1898:Koveras 1884:Koveras 1864:that.-- 1855:Koveras 1835:Koveras 1817:Koveras 1795:Koveras 1765:Koveras 1751:Koveras 1731:Koveras 1684:Koveras 1640:Broad: 1577:Koveras 1551:Koveras 1528:Koveras 1508:Koveras 1489:Koveras 1427:Koveras 1399:Koveras 1371:Koveras 1345:Koveras 1280:Koveras 1260:Koveras 1240:Koveras 1231:Koveras 1203:Koveras 1180:Koveras 1155:Koveras 1136:Koveras 1127:Koveras 1082:Koveras 1062:Koveras 1042:Koveras 1021:Koveras 989:Koveras 969:Koveras 943:Koveras 920:Koveras 883:Koveras 849:Koveras 838:Koveras 793:Reviews 782:Koveras 768:Koveras 741:Koveras 653:Koveras 634:Koveras 537:Koveras 510:Koveras 476:Koveras 407:Koveras 339:Koveras 286:Koveras 238:Koveras 190:Koveras 149:Koveras 130:Koveras 111:Koveras 39:archive 2547:Simple 2517:Rhynri 2483:Rhynri 2464:, and 2110:WP:WAF 1880:WP:ATE 1464:, and 1310:Madlax 2412:Freud 1703:$ yD! 1674:PresN 1450:heavy 1219:. --- 1217:WP:RS 1098:$ yD! 998:WP:RS 939:don't 525:up!-- 16:< 2300:some 2194:this 2058:Lain 1942:Lain 1916:talk 1813:here 1778:into 1761:this 1707:talk 1666:Pass 1660:Pass 1654:Pass 1648:Pass 1642:Pass 1636:Pass 1630:Pass 1547:Lain 1417:talk 1339:help 1215:and 1213:WP:V 1199:here 1178:? -- 1176:look 1102:talk 1078:site 915:Noir 892:Noir 814:etc. 700:Noir 667:much 255:must 236:? -- 1999:sic 1985:sic 1926:FFX 1608:GAC 1308:". 642:Wow 495:Kov 451:Kov 426:Kov 382:Kov 358:Kov 306:Kov 282:ANN 261:Kov 209:Kov 173:Kov 2501:-- 2460:, 2456:, 2448:FA 2396:er 2326:so 2143:-- 2132:er 1713:) 1709:• 1566:-- 1487:-- 1460:, 1397:-- 1369:-- 1343:-- 1326:: 1324:}} 1320:{{ 1300:}} 1294:{{ 1123:}} 1117:{{ 1108:) 1104:• 987:-- 918:-- 847:-- 780:-- 109:-- 2490:2 2328:. 1919:• 1914:( 1717:. 1705:( 1420:• 1415:( 1341:) 1316:. 1304:" 1112:. 1100:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index