Talk:Main Page/Archive 105 - Knowledge (XXG)

1559:

is more likely to appear then an article on a common topic. The key point I was trying to make which you still seem to be missing is that if Raul truly chose at random, there would be absolutely no bias or 'centrisim'. But Raul does not choose at random and so it is easily possible there is bias and centrism. In fact, I personally believe there is a slight bias or centrism towards more 'obscure' topics and I think that's a good thing given the wikipedia wide systemic bias. However, even if I'm wrong, the fact remains that since the TFA is not chosen at random, the only way you can really say with any degree of confidence that there is none is by conducting a statistical analysis. You can't simply assume there is no bias unlike you could if the TFA was chosen at random. BTW, have you realised that according to your definition of random, what you and I say is random as I can't predict with absolutely certainty what you're going to say and you can't predict with absolute certainty what I'm going to say. The same with bus timetables, the stock market, elections... If you don't want to understand what random means, that's up to you, but don't blame people when they correct you when you potentially mislead other people. It isn't just nitpicking as you seem to think, there are important reasons why people understand the TFA is not chosen at random.

5101:

argument (particularly calling upon "previous discussions" that are so far unforthcoming and may or may not exist) was unhelpful. I don't think you've made your point too well, but if you're saying that it's acceptable in this encyclopaedia to describe the island of Great Britain or the the post-1707/1800 United Kingdom successor states as "England" then you are wrong, wrong, wrong. Just because some ignorant people do it, does not mean we all should - the purpose of this project is surely to dispel ignorance, not perpetuate it. If the result of this "previous discussion" was to establish that this is somehow acceptable, then I would like you to point me to it so that I can go there and potentially have input. Thirdly, the original item re the Duke of Marlborough was (I think, it was a while ago now) accurate in that it referred to the pre-union (i.e. 1704) English military. Fourthly, if 3/4 of the users are against your point, then the way to win them over is through rational argument and marshalling of evidence, not by bizarrely quoting Hollywood movie dialogue and spitting the dummy when people try and engage you in constructive/light-hearted debate. Fifthly, congratulations on your A grade in your history O-Level and good luck in becoming an American.

5035:

king who formed the UK and it will be the the Scottish people who may decide to break up the UK in a few years. I would have thought such an esteemed hisorian as you would have known that. For Info most of the ships of the Royal navy during Georgian times would leave port in Plymouth, Portsmouth and Chatham and sail north with minimal crew to pressgang experienced sailors from Fife, east Scotland and the Northern Isles of Orkney and Shetland as they were considered the greatest sailors of the age, these were not particularly loyal areas for the crown and there for it is unlikley that any Naval comander of the time (Russel Crowe included) would refer to the ship as England as it would more likeley cause mutiny than spurr the men to war. As for the Nelson Signal, well that was how it was reported to the Admiralty (all English Aristocracy) but he might not have sent that as for the high pecentage of Scots and Irish men in the battle who would have been rather pissed off at being there instead of in the chosen and profitable career in the Merchant Navy. Of course I speak only as an Officer in the UK Merchant Navy and former Royal Navy Reservist who has studdied UK Naval History, But Hollywood could be right. C Ryan

2463:. If we celebrated our 1.5 m article, we should celebrate our 2 m article. Also, I clocked random article 20 times, and I found 14 stubs (70%), 5 pages with no references or links whatsoever (25%), 2 articles with a tag at the top (10%), 4 articles without talkpages (20%), 10 biographies (50%), 1 created within the past month (5%), 2 with any edits within the past week (10%), 1 with a talkpage with more edits than the article (5%), 13 with no images (65%), 1 with potentially offensive words or images (5%), and 4 articles that do not require scrolling on my computer to reach the bottom of the actual article (20%). What do you think about these stats? I think we should do a little something for the main page this labour-day-ish event. The wikipedians might want to be all technical about the insignificance of nice round numbers, but the general public likely won't. Knowledge (XXG) is generally among the top ten most visited sites in the world, and it would be nice if we did something to commemorate and notify. Thanks. ~ 3061:

Knowledge (XXG).Is a stolen Mona lisa,witch was uncovered two years later more important,then an invasion of a 15 milion country by five armies and a subsequent ocupation,leading to a restored dictature,lasting over 21 years?My grandfather was not allowed to teach anymore,because he openly opossed the ocupation, thousands of people lost their jobs or were sent to prison-ive seen people who were banned from their workplace,just because a russian soldiers opened fire on them and another man,who was forced to pay a fine (for "purposely damaging soviet property") ,when a rusian tank hit his car and injured him.Many people were left with lifelong consequences and the head of government was,prior to this,kidnapped into Moscow for "negotiation".Also note that this was presented as a "allied asistance",against the "creeping contra-revolution" and it was thereafter praised as an act of salvation of our "socialist nation" from "falling into the hands of western fascists and imperialist".Please respect this.

5016:, which is a light-hearted page. I meant that as a joke - sorry if it offended you. From your user page I assumed you were British and would understand that link in linguistic and cultural context, although from your use of language it seems you may be an American who has only studied in the UK - if so, please understand that the phrase and concept is almost always used in a light-hearted and jocular fashion. I never said it was Knowledge (XXG) policy - it's a joke. Hopefully there is still room for humour here on Knowledge (XXG). I do agree with Atropos that you have overeacted a little bit - sometimes these things happen to the best of us. Do try and keep a sense of proportion though; not sure how long you've been editing here, but you might want to develop a bit of a thicker skin. 1914:"Old Dan Tucker", also known as "Ole Dan Tucker", "Dan Tucker", and other variants, was a denigrating American popular song of the antebellum period, conventionalizing the then-common blackface comic travesty of Black people. Its origins remain obscure; the tune may have come from the oral tradition, and the words may have been written by songwriter and performer Dan Emmett. The blackface troupe the Virginia Minstrels popularized "Old Dan Tucker" in 1843, and it quickly became a minstrel hit, behind only "Miss Lucy Long" and "Mary Blane" in popularity during the antebellum period. "Old Dan Tucker" entered the folk vernacular around the same time. Today it is a bluegrass and country music standard. 1411:

about it perhaps you'll realise. I will say that if TFAs are chosen at random, there will definitely be no bias other then the systemic bias throughout wikipedia although streaks of 'similar' articles wouldn't be surprising. Given that Raul does not choose at random however, it's easily possible for bias or 'centrism' to occur, inadvertently or purposely. Indeed, I'm pretty sure there is a minor bias against our common topics (pop culture, American-related stuff) which addresses somewhat our systemic bias which IMHO is a good thing. BTW, this doesn't mean articles on common topics never appear, simply that an article on an uncommon topic has a slightly greater chance of being chosen.

4934:

before those Union acts? Listen buddy, you don't direct someone to a page that says "Bullocks or Bollocks" or whatever the hell - don't be so foolish to think that everyone knows the difference, if there is one (im not disputing it so hold ur horses). That is beside the point anyway. I only said that alot of people use to refer the whole of Britain as England and indeed some people still do. As stupid as it sounds, you can't seriously expect me to quote or obtain sources suggesting this. What the everyday man says like saying "England" instead of UK or "Bullocks" instead of "Bollocks" is not exactly a science that is recorded for future reference.

4147:, I think you might be misunderstanding this issue. The person who contributed each bit of text is preserved in the edit history, and the person who contributed each image is preserved on the image page; this is necessary for licensing reasons, because contributors do possess the copy left for their contributions. In addition to this license related attribution, the Picture of the Day template includes the name of the person who created the image. This additional attribution, that images don't get in articles and articles don't get anywhere, is the subject of this conversation. Also, although I haven't fully processed 3323:

significance and both are well written we would choose the one of far greater significance. On the other hand there is a very large grey area of relative significance where we avoid treading and if an item is of sufficient signifance for OTD, relative significance is probably the last area we will tread anyway. We will usual look at things like balance etc first. If there are two or 3 items from the UK or US or China for example we will probably only choose one if there are lots of other stuff from other countries even if the UK or US items are arguably of more significance then the other items.

4161:

wish. I simply don't understand why we should cease to credit photographers because we can't credit everything. Yes, it would be inappropriate in an article but I don't think it's inappropriate on the main page. In addition to the other utilitarian arguments given above for retaining the credit, I'd also point out that it sets a good example to people visiting the project to gather photos for use in other contexts. It wasn't all that long ago the same photographer who provided us that wasp found several of his FPs being re-used without credit. I say keep it. ~

3362:, which means it could not be a selected anniversary entry. One of my biases was that I would select the oldest documented eligible date entry. That means the date of the first historical eclipse will make it to the Main page, for example, because we can document it from an astronomical calculation coupled with a historical reference. And if some army were defeated because they feared the effect of the eclipse, so much the better for the selected entry. Another of my biases is that I would select a scientific anniversary over some war event. Thus 3354:). Mav was instrumental in this initiative. Mav's original concept was that he would populate a week's worth of anniversaries and the community would fill in the rest. But no one was helping him out, as only a few people understood how to navigate the pages that populate them. So I stepped up and populated several hundred days with selections and images. The restrictions were/are that the selections have to come from the Events section in the Day article. Thus if a well-known event was known to have occurred in 1687, but the 496:

I'm inclined to think that the "unexpected" provision for those who are not in high-ranked positions when they die or whose deaths do not make a major international impact is appropriate inasmuch as ITN, rightly or wrongly, serves not simply to present breaking news headlines (any death, unexpected or not, after all, may be included on ITN where it has a significant impact, such that the relevant article(s) can be updated with at least a good bit of encyclopedic content—beyond, that is,

1449:

unpredictability, it has an element of randomness. Can you see my logic here? Because Random is described (in a few words) as lacking an obvious or predictable pattern and the TFA's lack an obvious or predictable pattern, then TFA's must contain an element of randomness. Do you like how I have used logic here to prove my point? It doesn't matter how they choose it or with what system, because my above point will still hold out - you can't predict what will be choosen next!

31: 2591:. I don't normally edit random articles, and if I did, there are thousands more I could edit, and I just don't have that kind of time. Also, surveying each article took about 3 minutes, so I can't possible examine, like, 10 000 edits a day! Besides, I'm not that wikiholic, even my my highest score was actually under 10000, and I have less than 2000 edits, although I haven't taken it in a long time. Thanks. ~ 4732:

Kingdom Of Great Britain and Ireland Expects That Every Man Will Do His Duty" in semaphore. I'd still like Tourskin to point me to the discussions that provide reliable sources that the island of Great Britain (or the wider UK) was referred to habitually as "England" at the time - to the best of my knowledge, that just isn't true. One naval order on one day from Admiral Nelson does not a paradigm make.

3817:) ownership of the article, and even for DYK's it might give the unexperienced newcomer the impression articles are written by a single person and then largely left as they are. This is usually what happens for pictures, however. In some cases taking a picture is certainly a lot less work than writing an article, but it would almost certainly give the wrong impression if we started crediting authors. 4920:, although I suppose the former does tend to connote the latter. In short, if the sources don't say it, then it isn't true (or at least it isn't verifiable, which is far more important that subjective "truth" for our purposes). (Ironically enough, in this case the original entry was actually accurate - it was your subsequent line of argument that was flawed.) Anyway, that's the end of it. 3421:' to OTD if I had the time. Remember, that means that date has to be a cited item in a well-written article, and an entry has to go into the Day article, before a past-tense sentence can be included in the OTD queue. Another suitable day would be the last day of the Mayan Calendar Round in 2012, at which point the Mayans would have simply repeated to the first day of the Round. Anyone? -- 2552:(undent) As stated above by Nil Einne, albeit possibly tongue in cheek, two million articles isn't such a big deal when, as suggested by AstroHurricane001's random survey, a vast majority of those two million are sub standard. 25% of 2,000,000 is 500,000. Not as great an achievement when you look at it objectively and focus on the reality not the statistic. Perhaps something like 5122:- please look carefully at what I wrote. I of all people should know this considering my British Nationality. I never once said it in this discussion. I already said that could not present a good argument because its diffifult to cite these so called ignorant people. Oh and thanks for the good luck, but I don't need it. Oh and I wholeheartedly accept your earlier apology. 3643:. I can rattle off a bunch of other reasons, but the short of it is this: The credit byline allows us to make use of a fair number of additional tools, with little to no downside. I can't say that prior to this section, I'd noticed vast hordes of disgruntled editors muttering about those dang photographers and their "special treatment". 4902:

argument here without many sources. Well, the thing is, soruces of the olden times don't generally comment about informalities so much as formalities. For example, a historian of Nelson's time would not likely say "England won" but "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland has triumphed" to sound all heroic and official.

2587:(edit conflict)Well, do you really think I have that much time? That would give me a horrible headache (no offense)! I'm also pretty sure I don't want to have a case of Severe Acute Addictional Wikipedian's Sudden Penatrative Traumatic Migranative Radiational Electromagnetic Meningitial Abfunctional Brain Tumour Syndrome 3443:

picture of the day is a collaborative process, just as writing an article is. In some cases, the photo will even be directly edited (cropping, color) by multiple people. Singling out a photographer for credit on the main page is unfair to all the uncredited people who contribute greatly to the site.

4213:

I respectfully disagree with the choice mentioned in the FAQ : ease scrolling over search. I don't mind clicking before I can scroll, however it is frustrating to start typing to search for a word and then discover one should click first and then re-type. People get used to whatever the famous search

4103:

Your choice of wording was hardly neutral, especially the parenthetical comment. You really shouldn't dismiss the discussion (as you did by saying it was a discussion that gained no consensus), especially when there seems to be a majority in favor of removing the credits, and no attempt at responding

3503:

This last point is absurd. In the case of the current POTD of a wasp, the photographer got a decent camera, set up a shot of living animal on a flattering background with appropriate lighting and then uploaded it with appropriate detail on type and size. To state that an editor who writes "Support.

3264:

this admin became active on SA/OTD (keep in mind that selected anniversary pages were created around late 2003-early 2004). If there are articles on there from last year that are now involved in edit wars, heavily tagged, etc., or the date has recently been cited and verified as wrong, only then will

3121:

link at the bottom of the "On this day..." section and scroll down to 1968, you'll see that the event you refer to is mentioned to have occured on this day. Of course you might want it to be more prominently displayed...I personally have no idea how it's decided which events are displayed on the main

1905:

Old Dan Tucker" is a popular American song. Its origins remain obscure; the tune may have come from the oral tradition, and the words may have been written by songwriter and performer Dan Emmett. The blackface troupe the Virginia Minstrels popularized "Old Dan Tucker" in 1843, and it quickly became a

1062:

Hey I've noticed something. These articles either North-Americancentrism (like report of 1800), British-Isles-centrism, or Australaisa centrism. I wonder why? How about, because its an English wikipedia and therefore, english countries will most likely have more articles to do with them? I mean, what

4901:

I like to take what people meant so I will take back what I said against you. However, you should have known that your above response was offensive. You can't just tell people "look at the page about bullocks and you will be much better" or something along those lines. I haven't been able to make my

4473:

The Duke of Marlborough did not command the forces of England, the Holy Roman Empire and the United Provinces at Blenheim:he commanded the forces of THE UNITED KINGDOM, the Holy Roman Empire and the United Provinces. I realise that using 'England' when the United Kingdom of Great Britain is actually

4138:

Contributing to an article is adding previously published information. Contributing an image is the creation of content. As I remember some policy guideline or introductory text (that I can't find at the moment) saying, the uploading of Wikipedian-created images is an exception to the general rule

4116:

Just out of interest, would this affect the credits currently listed on some images at Wikimedia Commons? The uploading guideline suggests that the contributor's name be mentioned, going against the general leaning of this discussion. I realise that the policy on Commons need not have any bearing on

3799:

I've written dozens of DYK entries that have appeared on the Main Page without anyone else having touch the article - can I get my name next to them in future? Clearly not. To say that a photograph is more deserving (as seems to have been implied) is rude to those that contribute in other ways. I

5034:

tourskin, your comments are extremely offensive to many people in the UK only the English refer to the UK as England but here in Scotland it would likeley get you a severe beating. It, is like saying that the US is England since the official language is English. Just for reference it was a Scottish

4933:

Hold on end of what? what statement was wrong? I think that you need to seriously change the way to present your thoughts since I have no idea what your are on about - soruces verify what? What was correct? What first statement? R u saying that Marlborough commanded British forces? Wasn't Blenheim

4024:

We do credit the creator of every image on wikipedia. It's on the image's history page- same as the way we credit our article writers. So you're saying that "Not crediting the photographer is pretty indefensible morally." but not crediting people who research for and write articles is perfectly OK?

3730:

And, GeeJo's claim that this has not been challenged before is not relevant to whether the practice should be changed now. Violating our policies and giving special attribution to one type of user is wrong. Whether we have been doing it for a week or a year does not matter, it is time to stop the

3539:

I believe it is your attitude that is offensive. I am simply stating that different people contribute in different ways. The person who queues up and maintains the picture of the day is doing important work. The person who comments on 100 potential photos of the day is doing important work. The

3516:

And people who took half a dozen trips to the library and spend dozens of hours writing a well referenced and informative article don't deserve the same amount of credit as people who worked hard to take a nice picture? The thing is, they shouldn't receive any credit at all, or expect to. Knowledge

3242:

So, no one definitively knows who chooses which of the selected anniversary events are displayed on the main page, or what the selection criteria is supposed to be? Just looking at today, there are 30+ events to choose from and culling that down to 5 on the basis of "significance", international or

2966:

Is this a bad joke? Why is Jake Gyllenhaal prominently featured on the main page??!! Isn't one of the joys of Knowledge (XXG) they way in which one can learn so many fascinating things that are NOT already in the domain of crass pop culture? This guy is a household name, a huge Hollywood star... do

1558:

The statement you quoted said a lack of order. As I specifically explained, Raul choice almost definitely does have order as he tries to avoid similar articles appearing too close together. As I also explained, I can in fact predict that on average per article, an article about a more obscure topic

1410:

I think you're somewhat missing the point. There is an important distinction between how Raul chooses the TFA and choosing TFAs at random and it is important that editors are aware TFAs are not chosen at random. I can't be bothered explainining in detail but if you read the random article and think

173:

Second, yesterday's featured article thumbnail image was missing. This is especially troubling since the article was about a painting(!) and very obviously would have benefited from an image. But it's abnormal and seems erroneous regardless; normally there is one thumbnail in each section, with the

169:

First, the "in the news" section is supposed to have new items added at the top and old ones dropped from the bottom, but I've occasionally observed new ones added in the middle (most recently, the Russian/Georgian thing -- it appeared within the last 24 hours below the older FREITLIN protest item,

5195:

Not contradictory. From the beginning I said that at the time (1704) most people referred to the UK as England. And then I added that today some people still do, regardless if its offensive (lol here comes the severe beating). Thanks for ending it on a nice tone tho! And that was not sarcasm, just

4852:

I think you are a sad little man. I don't give a damn what you feel, it seems that you yourself are well-acquainted with that Bullocks page. You wanna get personal than thats ur problem, I told you that England was used to refer to the whole of Britain at the time. I don't have specific references

4785:

a reliable source (so dont bother nailing me about it not being one) but in it the British soldiers refer to a so called foreign policy of "Make the world England". Also, look at Master and Commander, where Russel Crowe as the commander of the ship says to his British crew (theres lots of scottish

4578:

reasons. Previous discussion, to the best of my memory is somewhere to do with the Battle of Trafalgar, where Nelson used the signal "England expects every man to do his duty" - although it is true he used england because it was easier than the words "Great Britain" it still made sense to the many

4180:

I would like to suggest that upon loading the main page, cursor focus is set to the search field to allow users to start typing their query without having to click in the field first. As of today focus is not set there with either Firefox or IE. I don't know how to do this, but know it can be done

4160:

It would be great if we could credit everyone's hard work on the main page, but that's clearly not practical. Excellent photographs are one rare example where the credit can usually be attributed to a single individual for original work, and where we therefore have the option to credit them if we

3769:

Encouraging people to upload high-quality free images clearly betters this project. And clearly taking a picture is a different way of contributing than editing an article. As pointed out above, it's very uncommon to have multiple people contribute to an image, but many of our articles have been

2668:

I don't quite get the idea of Knowledge (XXG) thanking its contributors. If Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia, it has no feelings and no means to express them. If Knowledge (XXG) is its contributors, it would be saying thanks to itself. Thus, any sentence like that sounds formulaic and fake to me

1703:

Hi. Well, Typhoon Sepat isn't mentioned on the main page either. Are you going to wait until it hits land? Dean has already hit land, and is now a threat to major cities Like Santo Domingo and Houston. Typhoon Sepat is already starting its weakening phase, while Dean is expected to continue mostly

495:

Although it might be useful at some point (probably relative to a death that would otherwise be, to choose a rather indelicate word, more "significant" than this) to discuss more broadly whether the restriction of the second part of criterion five continues to command the support of the community;

3836:

The argument for including the credit is not because editors and photographers are different but because our use of text and images is different. An article can, and should, be edited by many people. However, images are not edited frequently and nearly all are still fundamentally connected to a

3613:

There is no proof that ignoring this rule is to the betterment of the project. To the contrary, it treats one type of contributor (photographer) differently than another (editors), which can only cause discontent. DYK also encourages people to add new content, yet we do not credit the authors on

3595:

is a guideline primarily intended to describe how captions should be used in articles. The purpose of the POTD is different from that of an article. It exists to encourage people to create and upload high quality, free images. Including a small caption with the user's (user)name contributes to

3395:

article explicitly contains the day and year, and that this entry is listed in the day article. Only 5 entries are allowed per day; we usually comment out any extra entries so that they can be restored if needed. Images are good for the main page, so that if a selected anniversary date has a good

3060:

It is a thing of great disrespect and moral degeneration,if the event of 21th August 1968,the invasion of Czchoslovakia by the armies of the Warsaw pact and the subsequent ocupation are not mentioned to have ocured on this day.If it remains so,It will be yet another disapointment,out of many,with

1996:

This has been brought up several times recently. General consensus is that it isn't a big deal. After we reached one million the focus is more on quality than quantity. Out of those two million articles it's said that the vast majority are unreferenced stubs. Big round numbers aren't particularly

1589:

If you guys haven't notcied, I have given up this argument and admitted defeat, (clearly the above joke was not understood how many of you guys watch anime)? My original point, for the fourth, and for the final time is that there is no centrism in TFA's, in my opinion. Well, shall we disband? Its

1316:

Stop nailing me for that. My point has been corrputed by things you have said that "no is really interested in talking about". Well boo hoo don't talk about the definition of the word random then!! If you see above I said "I think" he chooses them randomly. Certainly the pattern of these featured

5100:

be likely to gain you a severe beating in Scotland, because Scottish people are not mindless thugs. It is safe to say that most people would not take it altogether well however. Secondly, it is sometimes done, particularly by unwitting foreigners or the ignorant, but the way you constructed your

3863:

As I said, an article can, and should, be edited by many people. Adding a credit there implies that the user is and will remain the author of the article, when really DYK is supposed to encourage people to create and improve new articles. Featured pictures, however, are rarely improved (unlike

4866:

Ah, from your immature response it seems that you have not taken that in the light-hearted way in which it was intended. Never mind. With the best will in the world...you don't know what you're talking about. There is a vague element of truth to what you're saying, but you do not present a very

4731:

There is clearly a great deal of confusion here. The Battle of Trafalgar was in 1805, well after both acts of union. Why he chose to signal "England" rather than something more accurate is not known to me, although clearly it would have been a considerable pain in the arse to signal "The United

3456:

Whereas articles are almost 100% of the time a collaboration among many editors, photos are almost always the work of one person. In a dictionary, the authors are not credited on the cover or in a prominent place, because they all collaborated together. For photos however, the photographer is

3442:

I notice that today's Picture of the Day includes a photo credit. I am not sure when this practice started, but I think it should cease. Our normal practice is that authors are not credited on articles, on portals, or on the main page. This practice should apply to pictures also. Choosing a

3322:

I think what atropos may have been trying to say is that significance is not really the deciding factor in what items go on and what don't. It's true that items should generally be of moderate to great significance to go on OTD. And generally speaking if there is a very clear difference between

1094:

They're suppose to be randomly selected by Raul, I think. Whilst I don't like the idea of one man choosing what goes on the main page as FA of the day, he has chosen well (except for the History of Erotic images, what was that about!). Anyways, todays FA is the report of 1800, a change from any

1269:

Ok look forget what the hell Random means, we're losing track here people, my point was that there is no Britocentrism here. or whatever u call it. To make it clear I have nothing against Raul or against the articles hes chosen (except for one lol!), as I have already stated, whether or not he

3697:

Note: Apparently, I originally wrote my response in the plural, but when I wrote it only GeeJo's first example was included in his message. However, I feel that what I said still applies to his other examples. It'd be nice if he didn't edit his posts after someone had responded to them in the

3850:, even though absolutely no one had edited the article before it appeared at DYK? While FAs rarely have only one contributor, they frequently, even generally, have one person (or a small group functioning in tandem) who contributed nearly all of the content. Why don't they deserve a byline? 1066:

Actually, I haven't noticed any Aussie related content on the main page though. And Britocentrism actually originated on the ITN, there's the worst case of Britocentrism. As for the FCs on the Main Page, they're fine with me, no matter what country or interest they came from. Hence the ":

279:, I presume based on here (the edit summary says VP/A but there's no discussion at VP/A). IMHO it's okay since we currently only have one other item and the guidelines say up to 3. On the other hand, if there is other stuff that comes up that is arguably more important it could be removed 3526:

I responded to the line of argument made by Johntex, which is not the line of argument you have made. I don't care enough about the outcome of this discussion to take a position, unless one considers pointing out offensively bad reasoning by a person in the discussion to be a position. -

1448:

I think it is u who is missing my point. Are you saying that you can predict every FA that comes up? Then its absolutely not random. However, you and I both know that the pattern of FA's appearing on the Main Page has an unpredictable pattern for the most part. If it has an element of

199:

See the long debate above discussing why yesterday's FA had no image; in a nutshell, there were no free or uncopyrighted images which could illustrate the topic, and people have been extensively debating the pros and cons of the policy which disallows unfree images on the main page.

3157:

Please, only be sarcastic when you aren't obviously missing the point. While there is a minimum requirement for inclusion, things are not included on the main page because they're the most "important." As cute as I'm sure you think you're being, the hyperbolism is just annoying.

5161:

Does it come across as stressful and overreacting? Sorry if it does, I'm not at all stressed and I certainly didn't mean to overreact. I did look carefully at what you wrote, which does seem to be somewhat contradictory. But thank you for clarifying. I assure you by the way -

3477:

There are lots of articles that have been edited mainly by a single person. If you click "random page" 10 times you will find that more than half of the articles were written primarily by a single author. That does not mean that we should start singling these people out for

2996:

There is an error in the piece about Rhinebeck Post Office in the claim it was opened by the Crown Prince and Princess of Denmark and Iceland. Iceland is a republic and thus does not have a Crown Prince or Princess. It should be Greenland. The article has the same error.

2539:

it it should be included? Anything included on the main page should either be encyclopedic content (which, as metadata, this is not) or assist the reader in navigating the sea of encyclopedic content we have accumulated, 2,000,000 articles I hear (which this does not do).

698:

Hi, could someone point me to where it is decided what goes in the todays news section. I find it interesting that a bridge collapse in USA gets on, but a worse one in China doesn't. I guess its because no one can be bothered to write a decent article about the China one?

3853:

Or, how about this: why is a link to the image history not satisfactory for TFPs when a link to the article, which then links to its history is satisfactory for TFAs? Also consider why image credits are only included on the main page, and not anywhere the image is used.

3167:

Would you mind explaining the point then? The main are that chosen items must be "of moderate to great historical significance" and that the article isn't a stub. Items most certainly are chosen because of their importance, and in this case, the event was included in

2653:

Okay my suggestion was more tongue-in-cheek then serious but it did occur to me that we should have something a bit like that if we're going to mention the 2 million articles thing. Since I'm thankfully not the only one, I've modified it to a more serious suggestion

3490:

In regards to photos, even the selection of the photo is a community task. The people who are involved in that decision, including the work of posting the picture to the Main Page, are just as deserving of credit as the person who pushed the shutter button.

2695:

Maybe it's not festive enough? I thought about: "The English language Knowledge (XXG) now has articles on over 2,000,000 subjects. An abstract being (i.e. people that make comments on the Main Page discussion page) congratulates all contributors who use the

2375:

I think that's not a very good approach. We don't need to downplay it, 2 million is an achievement and we can be proud of it and enjoy it. Sure, improving articles is important, but there's no need to go the "2 million? yeah, ok, so what?" approach....

3396:

image, that is an argument for including it over some other date entry without an image. Mav is very clear that we shouldn't use internet citations, either, because they will reference Knowledge (XXG), and we have to break any chain of self-references.

1853:

Actually I remember that but I thought it was somewhat connected to Europe. Then again, cricket tends to be connected to supposed British Commonwealth bias and even football is sometimes connected to British-centrism somehow. I did forget fish though.

4104:

to the counters to the (in my opinion very weak) arguments for credit inclusion has been made by those in favor of the status quo. Further, that discussion was nearly two years ago, and treating it like this practically belongs at PEREN is very rude.

3504:

Very encyclopedic" in a FP nom subpage has equivalent importance towards getting the image to the front page of Knowledge (XXG) is an insult both to the photographer and to the intelligence of people who have the misfortune to read this argument. -

787:

I'm from the NYC area, so I think I'd know. Outside of the Northeast, you're lucky if you can find a train, and hardly anyone, even in the Northeast where Amtrak et al. actually have a fair number of trains, uses trains for long-distant transport.

2445:

That is defiantly true, but I don't think readers would mind a small announcement stating that we have now 2 million articles. The important thing is to keep it small and humble. If reaching X million articles was common I would agree with you.

3292:

But yes, it does seem arbitrary because it is trying to balance what topics are internationally significant, what articles are well-written, and maintaining a varied array of topics that span across different topics and centuries on each day.

2616:

We don't need to complain to Knowledge (XXG) readers that many of our articles are poor in quality. All we need is a short message taking little space, and to the point: "Knowledge (XXG) thanks its contributors for over 2,000,000 articles."

500:, which is the rather insubstantial form updates of the death of individuals who are not/no longer situated as by their deaths to generate more than cursory, non-memorial mention must usually take), but I gather from a few recent threads at 305:

Thanks. I asked the same question on the proposals board, not knowing where to ask such questions. Someone saw it there and added it to the list. It probably isn't so important. I just thought that St. Roch's feast day coming in the

766:

No use arguing now, but I daresay that I think you're mistaken on that account, Verrai; at least in metropolitan areas like New York City, trains and subways are extraordinarily common for commuting and just getting around in general.

1928:

When an article attains featured status, it gets archived, and that edition of the article can go onto the main page as TFA, what your looking at is that archived version, and subsiquent edits are living strong on the actual article.

4853:

because such information is common sense. Just like how people use to call the Soviet Union "Russia". The reason being is like Russia, England is the dominant political entity, backed up by the fact that English is spoken is the

4617:

No, he didn't; there was no Kingdom of Great Britain, let alone a Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland in 1704, only the Kingdom of England, the Kingdom of Scotland, and the Kingdom of Ireland. The three happened to be

981:

I'll bite and bring out my inner pedant, but just so no one is misinformed reading this, Great Britain is an island. So is Ireland. But they're two different islands. Now back to our regularly scheduled discussion.

3783:

I agree with Johntex. If only one person had contributed at all significantly to an article, we wouldn't be having this discussion, it would be unacceptable to give it a byline. The same should go for other media.

2523:

And I'm sure you did something to help improve those articles (or at least tagged them) while you were performing a survey of a far too small sample size (one 100,000th, that's a centimeter's part of a kilometer).

1521:

My original point was that there is no centrism. I hope we can agree to this? Ok so they are not random, he chooses them with something you re not willing to explain, but no offence, I don't care too much either.

821:

Actually, being serious again, I'd write it myself if I wasn't already bogged down with various stuff. I've written various articles on incidents that are similarly largely ignored by English-speaking countries.

702:

Also anyone else think FA articles really tend to be filled with things that are so obvious they don't need to be mentioned: "Rail transport in India is one of the most common modes of long-distance transport."

3457:

almost always credited in a prominent place, and you wouldn't expect to see the name of the person who brightened, darkened, or cropped the image. I think that photo credits are a good idea and should stay. —

848:. Many news stories from outside the English-speaking (typing) world never get on MainPage. To help, follow Blood Red Sandman's lead and write up (type) more. Please feel free to start with a topic such as 1495:

You're getting very worked up about this. Raul has said himself that he does not chose them at random. We cannot predict them because we are not Raul and cannot read his mind. This does not make them random.

1217:

That is a rather poor definition of random, and there's even a page for requests to have an article featured on a certain date. As for the rest of the days, Raul probably just uses a common technique such as

926:

Oh yeah, blame the music, just like the chucked-out Judas Priest case and others the article references. That such people listen to the music is the effect, not the cause. Even as part of a joke, that always

4780:

Dude, if I remembered every discussion, I would shoot myself, but fortunately for me I don't and unfortunatly for you. However, just to satisfy ur taste, look at the movie "Last of the Mohicans". This is

2281:

It should be noted that that banner was taken down rather quickly after the event generated no press coverage. I expect the press will care equally little about two million as they did about one million.

4047: 5316:

I used to think American/rest of world arguments were the must fun. But having spent a bit of time in wikipedia I've learnt that these United Kingdom vs constituents arguments really take the cake...

1270:

chooses it randomly. Gees, people, please don't pick out every small mistake, I aint perfect, just trying to participate in discussion! If u waana discuss what random means, theres a talk page for it.

1704:

strengthening over the next few days. Dean could easily become the strongest North Atlantic hurricane since 2005, it's already a major hurricane. It may as well be on the main page...soon. Thanks. ~

4441:. Items appearing in ITN are pointing to Knowledge (XXG) articles which have been substantially updated with information regarding current events that are currently in the news media's attention. 1726: 5078:

It does not matter if it offends scotsman. Its true still. A lot of Assyrians are called Infidel, like myself. Its offensive, but nonetheless, I am an infidel to the Muslims of my country, Iraq.

743: 4531:

de facto or not, its the de jure that counts. Besides, as previous discussions elsewhere have stated, England was used to refer to the whol Island. Which was, by the way, under Eglish control.

474:

Yeah. Just read the criteria for putting a death in the "In the news" section...Although Merv was pre-eminent in the television field, his death was not sudden, nor was it unexpected. My bad.

380:

In St. Roch's article it says that in Bolivia his day is celebrated as "the birthday of all dogs". On the other hand, the Chinese celebrate that on the second day of the (Chinese) New Year.

113:

Hi!, can a sysop or someone else tell me (in this talk page) how can you remove the title "Main Page" of the page. Is it a WikiMedia extension or a localsettings.php configuration?. Thanks!.

3413:

I would like to thank PFH Lai for stepping up and completing a year's worth of anniversaries. The encyclopedia needs more selections, and the archive system ensures that we will always have

599:

The main page only lists the first 25 largest or so wikipedias, the rest can be found via the two links at the bottom of the lists. Georgia has less than 17,000 articles. Keep writing! :) --

5290:

Continouning in the joke spirit, are you sure it's a star. Perhaps it's an asterix intended to connote that you didn't really deserve an A but they gave you one anyone to keep you happy?

213:

Items on ITN are listed chronologically, with the most recent news on top. Sometimes, old news getting onto ITN late won't show up at the top because some newer news is already there. --

3144:

Am I missing something? I was under the impression that only events "of moderate to great historical significance" were chosen. But if we're not going by significance, can someone add

3568:

which states "Generally, is only included in the caption if the photographer is notable." This means that the photographer should be uncredited unless they are a famous photographer.

3265:

this person remove and replace them. Most of these replacements are chosen with the help of cross-referencing what events and well-written articles are listed on the Knowledge (XXG)'s

3252:

There is one admin who is very active in updating these pages for the past few months, but more in a maintenance capacity than a primary source of new suggestions. I have spoken to

2935:

aren't there... Aren't most wikipedia readers heterosexual males? Shouldn't we cater to them more then others (reusing the ole' American make up most of wikipedia readers argument)

3230:

is under a heavy POV edit war, like it currently is now, it will not be on there (unless someone finds another way to rewrite the blurb so another article is featured and bolded).

915: 911: 5138:

By the way, beg your pardon but I did not achieve and A but an A*. (Oh hope you realize that this over-reacting line is a joke). Now that all seems to have been accounted for...

2415:

Blech. Please just don't do anything. The only people who care are editors; the main page is not written for editors. Post it at the community portal or something if you have to.

4139:

against original content on wikipedia. As such, the image creator owns not only the copy-left (which is true for text contributions) but also the content of an image. You do

2328:

Well, I care about having 2,000,000 articles. How many encyclopedias have done that? I know we have to improve existing ones, but creating new ones is just as important, IMO. --

1972:

hi sory my english not that good. will there be main page notice about 2,000,000 articles when we hit mark? i know there was celebration for 1,000,000, but what about 2 milion?

3243:

otherwise, would seem to have to be a fairly arbitrary procedure in my opinion; even discounting articles currently involved in edit wars, heavily tagged, or crappily written.

2967:

we really need to have him promoted on the main page of Knowledge (XXG) as well? I'm totally disgusted and disappointed. (I have nothing against the guy... loved Donnie Darko)

2768: 1239:

I could give you a 12,000 page essay on the word Random, but for the sake of proving my point, unpredictable is a fine word to describe it, think of a better one if you will.

3192:

Are you sure about that, Atropos? Articles with maintenance tags and other deficiencies tend to be excluded from the selected anniversary section, but as far as I know items

2425:

No I tink you wrong Atropos. It not just for editors we should be proud of acomplishment and how we work together. We should do the banner. It not to big but not to small.

4201: 4949:

Furthermoore, don't make me laugh - don't point me to an article that isn't Knowledge (XXG) policy - is says so at the top with a template its just an author's opinion.

3358:

remained undocumented, we could not use it in selected anniversaries. And if an article did not contain the documented date, it could not be in the Events section of the

1906:

minstrel hit, behind only "Miss Lucy Long" and "Mary Blane" in popularity during the antebellum period. "Old Dan Tucker" entered the folk vernacular around the same time.

438: 3827:

No one is suggesting that we credit writers, everyone knows that that would be stupid. We are saying that photographers and artists should be held to the same standard.

2010:

I was about to contradict that, but I decided to hit "random article" ten times... 8/10 were stubs, 9/10 were unreferenced(!!) Still, it might be worth a small mention.

1883: 1765:

Don't know about windo... seems to me it's bigostormocentrism. No one's writing about the minor storm we're having in Auckland or the light breeze they're having in KL

842: 462: 3631:

function without violating the terms of the various permitted Attribution licenses, which allows for more encyclopedic POTD templates for labelled diagrams such as in

3145: 3940:

I do remember it was removed for a couple of days until people complained here... That's why the people here invented the FA-count to "counter" the article count. --

3864:

featured articles). We don't use credits in articles because including someone's picture in an article is not supposed to be a way of recognizing his or her work.

3181:

I thought that while items must be "of moderate to great historical significance" that They were chosen from within that set arbitrarily for variety and interest? --

4799:, one which I feel should be an essential reference for any Wikipedian. You in particular may gain considerable benefit from a thorough analysis of its contents. 3774:

says that there should not be references to Knowledge (XXG), not that we should not attribute users that require attribution to their Knowledge (XXG) usernames.

805:

about some bridge in China collapsing? this is America...we hate the chinese, don't we? if there's a double standard it's because WE RULE!! ::Sarcasm intended::

4415:

I've found your "in the News" column on the front page of Knowledge (XXG) does not really reflect the most relevant, current, or interesting news. What gives?

232:, the patron saint of dogs. Could this be mentioned on the main page? Sorry if this type of request is out of place on this talk page. Keep up the good work. 3169: 3080: 276: 4412:

with the Endeavor landing safely. It happened a few days ago, and there must be -MUST BE- more news in the world and in Wikinews worthy of your front page.

3890:

If anybody wants to know or care, AFAIK, the practice of putting the image credits on the POTD templates and pages has been a tradition as far back as 2004.

4605: 2772: 2385:

I don't intend to downplay it; I want to try and work something out that shows off the achievement, while still pointing out that we want quality, too.

4857:

official language and the capital is in England etc. I did not mean to insult you so next time present an argument, do not present ur Bullocks stuff.

3219: 1207:

Isnt random defined as unpreictable? Are the articles not selected in such a fashion? With a few exceptions i.e. an American article for July 4 etc.

878: 2683: 2655: 2553: 2497:

It was removed with the edit summary "This is not how we do this" because the banner was put in the wrong place. Those types of banners belong on

2317: 3305:

Ok, thank you for clarifying. I was just curious. Keep up the good work; I hereby absolve you of "great disrespect and moral degeneration." :)

2764: 1569: 4540:

An encyclopedia should not perpetuate ignorance. The island is Great Britain. The forces the Duke of Marlborough was leading were English.

2183:(un-indent)It will be an event which promotes considerable press-coverage, so I think we should certainly show it in some way... I've created 4690:

And sorry to lengthen this but Nelsons battle is well after 1707 - its in the early 1800's. Not that I care, I've had my fill of discussions!

4271: 4224: 3979: 3947: 3929:

No, it didn't. Unless you're talking about the FA count, that got removed. Some people wanted to remove the article count, but it was kept. —

3913: 3027: 2892: 2146: 2114: 1837: 1792: 1687: 1112: 1075: 1034: 1001: 965: 636: 1291:

No one is really interested in talking about random but you, Tourskin. All anyone's tried to say is that Raul does not chose them randomly.

867:

On the featured picture, I didn't see the featured star visible. This leads me to believe that the picture might be the wrong one, possibly?

2954: 4117:

that of Knowledge (XXG), but I think it is an interwiki point worth making. In regards to the manner of discussion, I suggest that we all

3196:

placed because of their significance. (Yes, yes, variety of topic and/or location is nice, but significance is still a major factor.) --

4642: 4311: 4188: 4151:'s attribution argument, assuming it's correct, it's very convincing, and it seems to have been ignored by some of the above comments. 2021: 3846:

I am well aware of your argument, and multiple people have already countered it. Can you explain why I shouldn't have had a byline for

3351: 3212:

It is both those factors: international significance and whether the bolded article is well-written. You probably would not never see "

1882:, there is no "top story" on MainPage. The top line on ITN is simply the most recent item that has qualified for an appearance, as per 4422: 190: 2434:

Anyone who has an accomplishment to be proud of is an editor. Readers are the consumer, they did not contribute to the encyclopedia.

1317:

articles for the most part is difficult to predict, meaning that they have some element of randomness involved. You cannot deny this.

3004: 2802: 390:

Would anyone be upset if I put it back on the anniversaries page? I see that there is only one other holiday listed for that date.

3540:

person who takes a photo of the day is doing important work. The last is no more deserving of recognition than any of the former.

5056: 4243:

if (wgPageName == "Main_Page") { addOnloadHook(function() { document.getElementById("searchInput").focus(); }); }

3371: 3270: 3266: 2927:

BTW personally I think you all are gay (or female)! :-P Really if want 'hot' stars in Brokeback Mountain we should be asking why

882: 590: 3335:

Even if the occupation wasn't included in otd, it wouldn't mean we think the Mona Lisa was more important than Czechoslovakia.

2829:

You are quite right that it should not be linked, though it would be better if you had posted it in the errors section above.

3223: 1254: 3260:

as a guide. But most of the time the choices made are more based on what articles and events were on those pages previously

4459:

Hope that helps answer your questions. If either of you have any suggestions please check the criteria and make them. :) --

3417:

to display. This also guarantees that we will always have room for more selected anniversaries. For example, I would add '

2640: 2184: 5075:

Yes I know English History. Maybe if u knew me u would know i got an A star in GCSE History (see my user page if u will).

4050:, and there was no consensus to remove photo credits from the POTD and I certainly doubt there will be this time either. 3580: 3640: 3636: 3632: 399:

I presume Tariqabouti (who removed it) and Pharos might be. I suggest you discuss it on the talk page with Pharos et al

4966:

You seem very stressed, Tourskin, perhaps you should take a breather? You're really overreacting in these two threads.

4346: 3649: 1886:. The items are listed chronologically, with the oldest item disappearing at the bottom as new ones appear on top. -- 4287:

I've added it, anyone is free to copy edit my explanation. But let's not make the FAQ into a lengthy how-to guide. --

1533:

Is it bad to be worked up? I don't like to give up if I see a point. It seems very random to me what appears on TFA.

1156:

It was Man of Bravery, silly. It says it right up there: "They're suppose to be randomly selected by Raul, I think."

2187:

to highlight one possible solution (a small banner; nondescript but still clearly noticable); feel free to edit it.

3227: 2336: 2299: 2252: 1809: 97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 38: 4276: 4229: 3984: 3952: 3918: 3032: 2897: 2776: 2498: 2200: 2151: 2119: 1842: 1797: 1692: 1129: 1117: 1080: 1039: 1006: 970: 641: 505: 262:

I agree with Mets501. If I had known about this earlier, I might have suggested to the TFA Director about using

4604:

For the honour of pedants, led it be known that Nelson led the forces (de jure) not of Great Britain but of the

2981:, and any featured article can appear on the main page. Its about the quality of the article, not the subject.-- 4485: 4444:

ITN works through suggestions. There's no one with the specific job to update ITN. Anyone can make suggestions

3588: 2958: 2592: 2464: 1705: 2602: 2474: 1715: 4192: 1017:

You mean your Britocentrism by concentrating on them as a single entity dominated by the 'British' part? :-P

5281:

And anyone who does not sense the joke in the above statement deserves to get a severe beating in Scotland.

4426: 4315: 2928: 2780: 2342: 2305: 2258: 2016: 1132:

is not exactly the most exciting topic, but it is an encyclopedic one, an dthat's really all that matters. —

483:

I'd also say that he isn't internationally known, but lets not spark another discussion about such things!

186: 5044: 4418: 4383:

in the suicide attacks, it says "at least 500." now this horrid attack is over 550. can someone change it?

4307: 4184: 3099:- August 21, 1968, Eastern Bloc armies from five Warsaw Pact countries invaded the ČSSR." (emphasis added) 3000: 2950: 2819:

Isn't this the wrong article to link to? What does the moral philsophy topic have to do with architecture?

2806: 2798: 1242: 578: 178: 4460: 4288: 4026: 3531: 3508: 3418: 2697: 2687: 2627: 2597: 2567: 2557: 2469: 2386: 2363: 2072: 2045: 2002: 1710: 936: 823: 653: 600: 586: 174:

POTD being a larger one of course. Today there are the usual complement of five thumbnails in particular.

128: 124: 4074: 3587:." When an image has been digitally modified, that person is credited with the original photographer (a 1729:

is today's featured article, so it is obvious that there is a BLATANT HURRICANE BIAS in Knowledge (XXG).

949: 114: 5266:

Of course they should, more so by the fact that I did not just get an A, did not just get an A STAR but

3306: 3244: 3123: 3008: 2862: 2644: 2216: 2188: 838: 201: 5229:

everyone should just take your word for it, after all you have an 'a' in a high school history class.--

4078: 3592: 3565: 2968: 2330: 2293: 2246: 1879: 1614: 901: 841:(4th link under the logo), and only big news stories with a well-updated wikipage gets featured in the 501: 182: 4786:

accents there so its not only english crew lol) "this ship is england". England, England, ENGLAND!!!!

4035: 3363: 3182: 2426: 2099: 1973: 5052: 5048: 5036: 4337: 4266: 4219: 3974: 3942: 3908: 3804: 3583:

states that "If a rule prevents you from working with others to improve or maintain Knowledge (XXG),

3528: 3505: 3022: 2887: 2784: 2760: 2756: 2141: 2109: 1832: 1787: 1742: 1682: 1677: 1191:

No one's calling you silly that I've seen. Lovok was calling Raul silly but that was largely in jest

1107: 1070: 1029: 996: 960: 674: 673:

ok, now back on topic. threshold 25000 means that we gotta have 25000 articles to appiar in the list?

631: 582: 529:

Please, correct your template, because Slovak Knowledge (XXG) has reached more than 75,000 articles.

487: 331:

I thought the St. Roch thing is coming up in a week or two when it'll still be winter, not summer...

716: 4646: 4518:

above the next time you want to suggest small changes and minor corrections on MainPage. Thanks. --

4127: 2231: 2089: 1987: 1063:

do you expect? Write a FA urself and ensure its content is such that it can come on the main page.

810: 475: 452: 4394: 3017: 2839: 2658:. Feel free to change it as you see fit. I've included a few comments in the talk page there too. 4627: 4541: 4489: 4092: 4061: 3753:

Putting a username on the front page is also a self reference to Knowledge (XXG), which violates

3064: 2882: 2857: 2011: 1938: 1919: 1250: 868: 730: 307: 5081:

Overreacting? What do u want me to do? Theres like 3/4 users on this page all against my point!!

4452: 4445: 4202:

Knowledge (XXG):Main Page FAQ#Why doesn't the cursor appear in the search box, like with Google?

2788: 1746: 1624: 1157: 3630:

Alrighty, two specific examples. One: The credit byline allows the use of the <imagemap: -->

3278: 2795:

Many thanks to all those who went to ITN/C for the discussions. --11:56, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

534: 5167: 5102: 5017: 4921: 4868: 4800: 4733: 4550: 4333: 4166: 3898: 3467: 3297: 3284: 3234: 3105: 3043:

And in any case, read the article and you'll see that Iceland was not a republic at the time.

2932: 2618: 2354: 2054: 2036: 1026:

Anything that is even remotely connected to Britain, such as Britannica is Britocentrism : -->

777: 417: 391: 381: 350: 311: 252: 233: 146: 5072:

Live in England 14 of my 18 years. 4 in Iraq and almost a year in USA (19th birthday soon!!!)

4118: 3771: 3754: 4398: 3880:

I'm in complete agreement with Johntex here. The practice of crediting photos should cease.

3422: 3198: 2875: 2566:

I was asking his permsision to fiddle it higher up, but he doesn't seem to be on right now.

2507: 2377: 2362:

Nil Einne, do you mind if I fiddle the wording on that a bit, to try and find a compromise?

1543:

Oh and no matter what you all say, at the end of the day, ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US!!!

932: 886: 567:

And i do not mean state Georgia (US) but country Georgia and georgian wiki. There is one at

4140: 3814: 2733: 5166:

needs a bit of luck from time to time - take good wishes when and where you can get them!

4654: 4626:

each was independent (to varying degrees; Scotland still had its own Parliament until the

4609: 4247: 4014: 3847: 3818: 3801: 3214: 3122:

page proper, but I doubt it's decided by "importance" and am sure no slight was intended.

2820: 2450: 1998: 1785:

Not too many people claim topicocentrism unless it is about a country... and dinosaurs. --

1641: 983: 484: 466: 5013: 4796: 4630:, but Ireland's status as an independent kingdom was a complete political fabrication). — 4488:

didn't even come into existence until 1707, so in 1704, "England" is the correct usage.

3346:

When we first populated Selected Anniversaries, mav149 (Daniel Mayer) and I followed the

3257: 2978: 530: 4497:

Although it might be worth noting if he was also leading Scottish forces, the two being

3347: 2460:

Hi. As a reminder, this is whaqt we did when we got 1.5 million articles for 2 minutes:

5344: 5317: 5291: 4144: 4122: 3964: 3881: 3324: 2936: 2924: 2723: 2659: 2320: 2227: 2204: 2131: 2085: 2063: 1983: 1855: 1822: 1766: 1672: 1610: 1573: 1560: 1412: 1192: 1018: 806: 400: 361: 332: 280: 47: 17: 3972:

They got tired updating it seeing the lead of the article count is too great. (LOL) --

849: 755:

It isn't everywhere: the United States hardly even has railways for non-freight use. —

170:

which had been there early yesterday morning -- and old ones dropped from the middle.

5361: 5331: 5282: 5273: 5197: 5139: 5085: 5012:

OK. You seem for some reason to have been deeply offended that I pointed you towards

4988: 4950: 4935: 4903: 4858: 4787: 4691: 4650: 4580: 4532: 4367: 4324: 4084: 4053: 3359: 3090: 3075: 2982: 2701: 1930: 1650: 1637: 1628: 1591: 1549: 1534: 1523: 1486: 1378: 1318: 1271: 1246: 1208: 1174: 1096: 991: 722: 542: 509: 4987:

Gees, will u guys lay of my back? U think I need a breather, make room for one then!

5330:, not must. Gees, conphuzing asterixes wit stars is bad enof. Know spellin mistaks? 4967: 4162: 4105: 3895: 3855: 3828: 3785: 3758: 3732: 3700: 3666: 3615: 3569: 3541: 3518: 3492: 3479: 3459: 3444: 3336: 3294: 3281: 3253: 3231: 3159: 3136: 3102: 3044: 2911: 2852: 2830: 2541: 2525: 2489: 2435: 2416: 2283: 1956: 1508: 1497: 1347: 1292: 1227: 1183: 1148: 918: 769: 747: 684: 551: 342: 289: 244: 143: 3800:

have to agree with Johntex on this one - I don't think the credit should appear.

166:

I hesitate to presume them errors, though they don't seem to be correct behavior.

2139:

No, since it's "special," we'd highlight a different fact on every DYK update. --

5364: 5347: 5334: 5320: 5294: 5285: 5276: 5233: 5230: 5200: 5170: 5142: 5105: 5096:

First of all, inaccurately conflating "England" with the "United Kingdom" would

5088: 5039: 5020: 4991: 4970: 4953: 4938: 4924: 4906: 4871: 4861: 4803: 4790: 4736: 4694: 4657: 4636: 4632: 4612: 4583: 4553: 4544: 4535: 4522: 4519: 4507: 4503: 4492: 4478: 4475: 4463: 4401: 4387: 4384: 4370: 4352: 4327: 4291: 4282: 4258: 4235: 4208: 4205: 4169: 4155: 4132: 4108: 4098: 4067: 4038: 4029: 4019: 3990: 3967: 3958: 3935: 3931: 3924: 3901: 3884: 3868: 3865: 3858: 3841: 3838: 3831: 3821: 3807: 3788: 3778: 3775: 3764: 3738: 3703: 3669: 3655: 3621: 3600: 3597: 3575: 3547: 3534: 3521: 3511: 3498: 3485: 3472: 3450: 3425: 3339: 3327: 3309: 3300: 3287: 3247: 3237: 3207: 3185: 3176: 3173: 3162: 3152: 3149: 3139: 3126: 3108: 3067: 3047: 3038: 2985: 2971: 2939: 2914: 2903: 2865: 2833: 2823: 2726: 2708: 2705: 2690: 2673: 2670: 2662: 2647: 2630: 2621: 2607: 2574: 2560: 2544: 2528: 2516: 2492: 2479: 2455: 2438: 2429: 2419: 2393: 2380: 2370: 2357: 2348: 2323: 2311: 2286: 2264: 2235: 2221: 2207: 2193: 2157: 2134: 2125: 2102: 2093: 2075: 2066: 2057: 2048: 2039: 2026: 2005: 1991: 1976: 1959: 1943: 1922: 1890: 1887: 1858: 1848: 1825: 1816: 1813: 1803: 1778: 1775: 1769: 1760: 1757: 1736: 1730: 1720: 1698: 1653: 1644: 1631: 1617: 1594: 1576: 1563: 1552: 1537: 1526: 1511: 1500: 1489: 1415: 1381: 1350: 1321: 1295: 1274: 1230: 1223: 1211: 1195: 1186: 1177: 1160: 1151: 1138: 1134: 1123: 1099: 1086: 1045: 1021: 1012: 986: 976: 952: 943: 921: 904: 889: 871: 856: 853: 830: 814: 794: 790: 782: 761: 757: 750: 736: 707: 704: 687: 677: 656: 647: 603: 554: 545: 512: 490: 478: 469: 455: 420: 403: 394: 384: 364: 355: 335: 314: 292: 283: 270: 267: 257: 236: 217: 214: 206: 149: 117: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5272:

best A star in the whole wide world. So u go out there Dacium, and u tell 'em.

4143:

your own images that you upload to wikipedia. On the technical, license side,

2215:; it's a bit bright, which is why I've used TFA green for the proposed banner. 2062:

Today we've created one million articles since 15 February 2006 (or something)

1821:

Or cricket, football (soccer to some), space (okay that one was never serious)

935:

got accused of Satanism! Seriously, think before blaming metal for everything.

4341: 4152: 4148: 4006: 3644: 2447: 1346:

I don't understand why you're acting so defensively. No one is attacking you.

229: 4455:

as a guide. This is to stop things like ITN becoming a sports or news ticker.

4214:

engine does (search on-focus). I am the person who made the suggestion above.

3374:

is a significant event, in my view, and would trump 'the day the music died'.

1649:

Not particularity, no, just stating a fact. Thanks for the concern, though.--

288:

Steve Dufour also asked at one of the village pumps, I don't remember which.

3118: 1667: 1590:

quite pathetic of me to have started an argument from someone's else jokes.

1219: 1095:

Briotcentrism, which I hardly noticed - I dont see any centrism of any kind.

628:

By the time you guys reach 25,000, the threshold will now be at 30,000 : -->

2484:

You mean the one that was removed two minutes later with the edit summary "

4437:

In The News is not a news service. Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia not

3906:

The article count has a looooooooooonger history but it got removed.... --

2080:

Let's keep it simple: when the counter hits 2,000,000 make the text on it

1467:

To quote from Knowledge (XXG)'s article has you have asked me to read it:

4917: 4913: 4438: 1377:

When one has to explain every word of their original message, one tires.

4362:

It doesn't look to bad. Oh wait there is no History section in the page

3635:. Two: it allows crops to be used without disturbing Attribution, as in 2098:

I actually tink it be mention on main page somewhere and it be in bold.

3963:

Why was the FA count removed anyway? Too difficult to keep up to date?

3367: 4474:

meant is a common practice: but that does not make it any less wrong.

3135:

Things are not placed on the main page because of their significance.

2838:

Requests for minor changes in the text on the mainpage can be made at

1623:

In the news isn't updated by magic. Feel free to make a suggestion at

5118:

You see ur response? It looks "stressful" and "overreacting". Well I

5086:

A stressed out, overreacting, yet A* GCSE Historian, wannabe American

4363: 263: 3391:

All editors are welcome to populate On This Day. Just make sure the

2130:

What are you going to delete the wikipedia article and start again?

3274: 1173:

whos calling me silly? Do you not choose the articles urself Raul?

571:

and would admins please add it to the "In other languages" column.

2718:

you know whats a good cause for celebration? My birthday which is

2626:

By that logic we don't need to put it in "reader space" at all. --

1918:

So why the rewrite? I thought Knowledge (XXG) wasn't censored? --

652:

Shh don't tell them that the threshold is set at Georgia+1 ;) --

4484:

The United Kingdom didn't come into existence until 1800. The

4005:

Not crediting the photographer is pretty indefensible morally.

2053:

We will have created one million articles since March 1, 2006.

744:

Knowledge (XXG):In the news section on the Main Page/Candidates

451:

Merv Griffin's death doesn't warrant a front page news blurb?

25: 266:

as TFA that day, rather than today. It's too late now. :( --

163:

There have been some odd problems with the main page lately.

2732:

What does your birthday have to do with the main page? But,

1727:

Effects of Hurricane Isabel in Maryland and Washington, D.C.

4641:

Sorry to continue this, but when I said 'Nelson', I meant

1955:

is the version from which the main page blurb was culled.

508:

that there may be developing a consensus to the contrary.

2977:

Any article that can be on Knowledge (XXG) can become a

4264:

Thanks. Perhaps we can display this on the FAQ page. --

3893: 3891: 3100: 3087: 2679: 2502: 2461: 2212: 1952: 1483:

Assuming I did not edit/vandalize the article myself.

139:

body.page-Main_Page h1.firstHeading { display: none; }

2501:. It was subsequently put there and resided there for 900:

So Knowledge (XXG) is starting a stamp collection? :)

568: 360:

Indeed they do... Fortunately there's none here today

340:

Damn Australians, always have to ruin everything :-D —

3665:

Those could easily be done with a link to the image.

1147:

Who said anything about me selecting them at random?

957:

Ireland = part of Great Britain = Britocentrism : -->

439:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Selected anniversaries/August 10

2779:

get on ITN to displace some of the old news on ITN (

2769:

Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America

2505:(although that might be a bit on the long side). -- 1884:

Knowledge (XXG):In the news section on the Main Page

463:

Knowledge (XXG):In the news section on the Main Page

3366:are more important than the American Civil War (as 4579:non-English British sailors fighting the French. 4570:The Island at the time was called England for the 837:Please also note that news headlines should go to 4549:What previous discussions, where? I'm intrigued. 4451:In an attempt to keep ITN sane, there's a set of 2589:(I like to eat eat eat eepples and beeneenees...) 2107:How about placing it on DYK for like 2 days... -- 2084:. Otherwise, the main page should be unaltered. 3170:Knowledge (XXG):Selected anniversaries/August 20 3081:Knowledge (XXG):Selected anniversaries/August 20 1676:. If you really want big and bad storms, please 277:Knowledge (XXG):Selected anniversaries/August 16 5343:Well at least I didn't get an A* in history... 3172:because it is an important, non-stub article. 1105:It was about the stamps FA we had yesterday. -- 1182:I choose them, but not necessarily at random. 3564:Crediting the photographer also violates our 2316:Personally this is what I think we should do 1935:The Archiver, Reformatter And Vandal Watchman 8: 4515: 4176:Make focus on search text field upon loading 2851:How can you put Jake on your main page when 661:what?...what?....i'm...you...(Homer Simpson) 4912:There's quite a lot of clear light between 4606:United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland 4304:what about jordan history and the country 2773:Bad Newz Kennels dog fighting investigation 498:So-and-so died from xx cause, aged yy years 275:It has actually been added by someone else 5069:I am not American, wish I was but oh well. 1507:Also, the "centrism" comments are a joke. 5120:did not say we should call the UK England 5064:Ok let me make some things straight here: 2226:I like that. Maybe a tad smaller though 1568:I'd read this before but forgot about it 879:Image:Along the River 7-119-3 portion.jpg 133:Don't display some stuff on the main page 3256:a number of times. This person uses the 881:. The description says it's a detail of 2910:No way, Jake Gyllenhaal is way hotter. 2656:User:Nil Einne/Wikipedia:Main Page test 2318:User:Nil Einne/Wikipedia:Main Page test 416:I will do that. Thanks for the advice. 4795:OK- I feel I should point you towards 4255: 4217:Can a monobook.js hack remedy this? -- 3352:Knowledge (XXG):Selected anniversaries 2815:Link to utilitarianism in the DYK area 2765:Kazakhstani legislative election, 2007 2704:." But it happened to be a bad joke.-- 2488:"? I think that makes my case for me. 1570:User:Raul654/Featured article thoughts 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3813:With articles though it would imply ( 7: 2291:Who said it's only for the press? -- 1997:notable except for those of us with 612:hehe, we will. thnx for quick reply. 4643:Horatio Nelson, 1st Viscount Nelson 3438:Photo credit for picture of the day 2669:and perhaps to other people too. -- 1471:The word random is used to express 910:Yes - it will go right next to our 4181:since there are pages that do it 3641:Template:POTD protected/2007-08-08 3637:Template:POTD protected/2007-08-16 3633:Template:POTD protected/2007-07-12 3073:For the past couple of years, the 1546:oh yes indeed, never forget that. 24: 4867:credible argument unfortunately. 3770:edited by more than one person. 3093:currently says, "On the night of 2871:Because Heath's article is under 2213:This is what we did for 1,000,000 883:Image:Along the River 7-119-3.jpg 569:http://ka.wikipedia.org/Main_Page 242:Not important enough, methinks. — 4514:Flonto, you may want to post at 3581:Knowledge (XXG):Ignore all rules 3372:Declaration of the Rights of Man 3267:List of historical anniversaries 2791:. --11:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 2556:but with the wording tweaked. -- 29: 4692:All your base are belong to us! 4651:All your base are belong to us! 4581:All your base are belong to us! 4501:the same country at the time. — 4338:Jordan (Katie Price)#Early life 3370:would say) in my view. But the 2842:. --02:37, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 1592:All your base are belong to us! 1550:All your base are belong to us! 1535:All your base are belong to us! 1524:All your base are belong to us! 1487:All your base are belong to us! 1379:All your base are belong to us! 1319:All your base are belong to us! 931:annoys me. Even the writers of 4429:) 03:07, August 25, 2007 (UTC) 4318:) 17:41, August 24, 2007 (UTC) 4195:) 17:48, August 23, 2007 (UTC) 3837:photographer or illustrator. 3224:President of the United States 3085:yesterday's "On this day" page 3011:) 13:21, August 23, 2007 (UTC) 2961:) 09:10, August 23, 2007 (UTC) 2643:. Succint, measured, perfect. 431:On This Day, August 10th, 2007 228:August 16 is the feast day of 1: 3020:(at the top of this page). -- 2746:--11:54, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 2535:So because the readers won't 2071:Where should this go then? -- 1830:Don't forget Eurovision... -- 1257:) 01:13, 2007 August 16 (UTC) 1068::p" at the end of my post. -- 885:which is a featured picture. 442:. 00:06, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 5198:A relaxed Tourskin (for now) 3269:pages with various credible 2035:be worth a "small mention?" 1897:Censorship on the main page? 1745:may be up next on ITN. (See 537:22:02 (CET) August 15, 2007 131:(find the comment that says 5365:20:09, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 5348:11:35, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 5335:03:27, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 5321:02:00, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 5295:02:00, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 5286:00:52, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 5277:00:51, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 5234:00:10, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 5201:00:36, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 5171:23:09, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 5143:22:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 5106:21:38, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 5089:19:35, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 5040:19:22, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 5021:12:44, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 4992:03:30, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 4971:02:36, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 4954:02:11, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 4939:02:09, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 4925:00:33, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 4907:22:14, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 4872:01:02, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 4862:23:44, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 4804:21:06, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 4791:20:26, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 4737:14:25, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 4695:07:23, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 4658:03:37, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 4637:02:40, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 4613:02:12, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 4584:02:46, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 4554:23:32, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 4545:23:25, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 4536:04:55, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 4523:00:01, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 4508:04:38, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 4493:21:33, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 4479:21:22, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 4464:03:43, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 4402:03:44, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 4388:02:49, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 4371:05:17, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 4353:19:57, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 4328:19:37, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 4292:02:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 4283:08:55, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 4259:08:36, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 4236:08:02, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 4209:19:43, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 4170:19:26, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 4156:01:06, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 4133:09:03, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 4109:07:31, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 4099:07:18, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 4068:07:12, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 4039:17:06, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 4030:15:06, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 4020:14:46, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3991:11:35, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3968:10:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3959:07:16, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3936:07:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3925:06:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3902:05:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3885:01:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3869:13:14, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 3859:05:56, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3842:05:09, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3832:02:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3822:00:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3808:22:21, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3789:21:56, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3779:21:50, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3765:21:46, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3739:00:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3704:02:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3670:22:16, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3656:22:10, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3622:21:42, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3601:20:39, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3576:17:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3566:guideline on photo captions 3548:00:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3535:00:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3522:23:43, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3512:21:53, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3499:17:47, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3486:17:47, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3473:17:37, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3451:17:07, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3426:11:18, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 3360:Knowledge (XXG) day article 3340:19:34, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3328:13:18, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3310:09:09, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3301:06:15, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3288:05:45, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3248:05:10, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3238:03:49, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3208:03:31, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3186:00:59, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3177:00:26, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3163:00:04, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 3153:23:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 3140:23:41, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 3127:13:48, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 3109:13:36, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 3079:article has been posted on 3068:13:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 3048:16:06, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3039:13:56, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 2986:22:39, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 2972:22:35, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 2940:10:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 2915:06:37, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 2904:06:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 2866:05:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 2855:was every bit his equal in 2834:02:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 2824:00:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 2727:03:40, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 2709:14:11, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 2691:13:59, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 2678:I tend to agree, how about 2674:13:47, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 2663:13:02, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 2648:09:27, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 2631:05:50, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 2622:02:47, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 2608:23:52, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2575:23:47, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2561:23:42, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2545:04:40, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 2529:23:28, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2517:03:45, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 2493:23:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2480:23:18, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2456:22:42, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2439:23:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2430:21:57, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2420:20:52, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2394:20:41, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2381:19:52, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2371:19:34, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2358:18:38, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2353:I agree with Boricuaeddie. 2349:18:15, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2324:18:10, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2312:17:41, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2287:17:35, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2265:17:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2236:17:18, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2222:17:07, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2208:17:06, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2194:17:02, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2158:03:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 2135:18:11, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2126:16:31, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2103:15:35, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2094:14:01, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2076:09:25, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2067:08:01, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2058:07:18, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2049:06:15, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2040:06:07, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2027:05:19, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2006:04:13, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 1992:02:48, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 1977:01:37, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 1960:03:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1944:03:21, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1923:02:55, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 1891:06:17, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 1859:17:51, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 1849:16:32, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 1826:08:00, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 1817:05:44, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 1804:00:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 1779:05:44, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 1770:18:41, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 1761:06:11, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 1737:05:38, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 1721:22:52, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 1699:16:11, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 1654:16:18, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 1645:16:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 1632:15:13, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 1618:15:09, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 1595:19:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 1577:13:30, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 1564:13:14, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 1553:02:22, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 1538:01:55, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 1527:01:53, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 1512:01:39, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 1501:01:38, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 1490:01:26, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 1416:21:05, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 1382:03:27, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 1351:03:24, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 1322:02:39, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 1296:19:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 1275:05:53, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 1231:23:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 1212:19:36, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 1196:23:40, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 1187:18:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 1178:18:52, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 1161:18:26, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 1152:14:35, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 1139:15:44, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 1124:08:32, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 1100:07:59, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 1087:05:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 1046:02:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 1022:18:26, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 1013:04:31, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 987:04:07, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 977:03:32, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 953:17:08, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 944:15:37, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 922:16:57, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 905:16:56, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 890:18:56, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 872:18:50, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 857:18:08, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 831:11:42, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 815:05:37, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 795:05:43, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 783:05:06, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 762:04:51, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 751:04:02, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 737:16:06, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 708:03:28, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 688:06:31, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 678:06:25, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 657:14:20, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 648:11:58, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 604:10:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 555:21:18, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 546:20:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 513:19:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 491:16:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 479:09:16, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 470:09:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 456:09:10, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 421:03:22, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 404:02:45, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 395:02:11, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 385:16:55, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 365:15:49, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 356:15:42, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 336:15:31, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 315:02:18, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 293:02:53, 11 August 2007 (UTC) 284:17:24, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 271:16:34, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 258:15:53, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 237:14:22, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 218:16:36, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 207:13:12, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 150:02:29, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 118:02:17, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 5385: 4121:about the matter in hand. 4046:We've had this discussion 3228:September 11, 2001 attacks 3119:More events on this day... 3117:Also, if you click on the 2742:HAPPY BIRTHDAY, TaylorLTD! 2486:This is not how we do this 2203:like last time. Cheers. -- 1725:Dean is now on ITN. Also, 1479:in non-scientific parlance 461:Please see criterion 5 at 2885:more tolerable for me? -- 2777:China Airlines Flight 120 2751:replacing old news on ITN 2499:Template:Main Page banner 1910:From the article itself: 1130:Postage stamps of Ireland 994:. Still Britocentrism. -- 877:The displayed picture is 506:Template talk:In the news 4516:#Main page error reports 4486:Kingdom of Great Britain 3593:Knowledge (XXG):Captions 3091:Prague Spring#Occupation 2199:I imagine we'll use the 563:Georgian Knowledge (XXG) 3271:"On this day" web sites 2929:Anne Hathaway (actress) 2881:and Anne Hathaway made 2781:2007 Qahtaniya bombings 1982:Party. My place. BYOB. 593:) 10:49, 13 August 2007 109:Main page without Title 4622:the same country, but 4379:request for news edit. 3419:the day the music died 2698:decimal numeral system 839:Portal: Current events 525:Slovak Knowledge (XXG) 129:MediaWiki:Monobook.css 5047:comment was added by 4433:Several points here; 4187:comment was added by 4073:P.S. Cross-posted to 4034:Zoney : Explain why. 3517:(XXG) has no byline. 3003:comment was added by 2992:Rhinebeck Post Office 2953:comment was added by 2801:comment was added by 2787:)? Please discuss at 2044:Explain why.... ;) -- 1245:comment was added by 42:of past discussions. 3258:On this day criteria 2861:and is much hotter? 2785:2007 Peru earthquake 2761:Crandall Canyon Mine 2757:Typhoon Sepat (2007) 1901:From the main page: 1743:Typhoon Sepat (2007) 1572:. Well worth a look 4649:, as alluded to by 4647:Battle of Trafalgar 4469:Britain NOT England 4340:, if you prefer :) 3364:Maxwell's equations 3089:because, I assume, 2554:Nil Einne suggested 2031:2,000,000 articles 1636:Bit stressed there 948:Philatelocentrism. 846:section on MainPage 616:(17000? that many?) 541:so it has - admins? 224:"Dog Day" coming up 4628:Acts of Union 1707 3279:The New York Times 2883:Brokeback Mountain 2858:Brokeback Mountain 1475:, purpose, cause, 914:and shelf full of 310:was kind of cool. 308:dog days of summer 5060: 4430: 4421:comment added by 4355: 4334:History of Jordan 4319: 4310:comment added by 4196: 4096: 4065: 3658: 3463: 3012: 2962: 2933:Michelle Williams 2810: 2570:Blood Red Sandman 2453: 2389:Blood Red Sandman 2366:Blood Red Sandman 1968:2 million article 1942: 1477:or predictability 1258: 939:Blood Red Sandman 826:Blood Red Sandman 773: 734: 595: 581:comment added by 346: 248: 195: 181:comment added by 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5376: 5360:Ah, fair point. 5196:for the record! 5042: 4635: 4533:Man of Bravery!! 4506: 4416: 4350: 4305: 4279: 4274: 4269: 4257: 4253: 4250: 4232: 4227: 4222: 4182: 4130: 4125: 4097: 4090: 4087: 4066: 4059: 4056: 4013: 3987: 3982: 3977: 3955: 3950: 3945: 3934: 3921: 3916: 3911: 3653: 3471: 3461: 3204: 3201: 3035: 3030: 3025: 2998: 2979:featured article 2948: 2900: 2895: 2890: 2880: 2874: 2796: 2700:and are fond of 2684:Nil Einne's test 2645:Recurring dreams 2605: 2600: 2595: 2572: 2513: 2510: 2477: 2472: 2467: 2451: 2391: 2368: 2345: 2339: 2333: 2308: 2302: 2296: 2261: 2255: 2249: 2219: 2191: 2154: 2149: 2144: 2122: 2117: 2112: 2024: 2019: 2014: 1936: 1933: 1845: 1840: 1835: 1800: 1795: 1790: 1734: 1718: 1713: 1708: 1695: 1690: 1685: 1613:not a top story 1272:Man of Bravery!! 1240: 1209:Man of Bravery!! 1175:Man of Bravery!! 1137: 1120: 1115: 1110: 1097:Man of Bravery!! 1083: 1078: 1073: 1042: 1037: 1032: 1009: 1004: 999: 973: 968: 963: 941: 912:puppy collection 863:Featured Picture 828: 793: 781: 771: 760: 735: 728: 725: 644: 639: 634: 594: 575: 574:thnx in advance 543:Man of Bravery!! 354: 344: 256: 246: 204: 194: 175: 134: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5384: 5383: 5379: 5378: 5377: 5375: 5374: 5373: 5043:—The preceding 4631: 4502: 4471: 4410: 4381: 4349: 4302: 4277: 4272: 4267: 4251: 4248: 4244: 4230: 4225: 4220: 4183:—The preceding 4178: 4128: 4123: 4085: 4082: 4054: 4051: 4027:138.237.165.140 4011: 3985: 3980: 3975: 3953: 3948: 3943: 3930: 3919: 3914: 3909: 3848:Nicolas Chorier 3652: 3458: 3440: 3215:Franklin Pierce 3202: 3199: 3058: 3033: 3028: 3023: 2999:—The preceding 2994: 2949:—The preceding 2898: 2893: 2888: 2878: 2872: 2849: 2847:Jake Gyllenhaal 2817: 2797:—The preceding 2753: 2743: 2639:I like Laïka's 2603: 2598: 2593: 2568: 2511: 2508: 2475: 2470: 2465: 2387: 2364: 2343: 2337: 2331: 2306: 2300: 2294: 2259: 2253: 2247: 2217: 2201:built-in banner 2189: 2152: 2147: 2142: 2120: 2115: 2110: 2022: 2017: 2012: 1970: 1934: 1899: 1843: 1838: 1833: 1798: 1793: 1788: 1732: 1716: 1711: 1706: 1693: 1688: 1683: 1675: 1665: 1607: 1241:—The preceding 1133: 1118: 1113: 1108: 1081: 1076: 1071: 1040: 1035: 1030: 1007: 1002: 997: 971: 966: 961: 937: 898: 865: 824: 789: 768: 756: 723: 720: 696: 642: 637: 632: 576: 565: 527: 449: 433: 341: 243: 226: 202: 176: 161: 140: 132: 111: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5382: 5380: 5372: 5371: 5370: 5369: 5368: 5367: 5353: 5352: 5351: 5350: 5338: 5337: 5314: 5313: 5312: 5311: 5310: 5309: 5308: 5307: 5306: 5305: 5304: 5303: 5302: 5301: 5300: 5299: 5298: 5297: 5279: 5249: 5248: 5247: 5246: 5245: 5244: 5243: 5242: 5241: 5240: 5239: 5238: 5237: 5236: 5214: 5213: 5212: 5211: 5210: 5209: 5208: 5207: 5206: 5205: 5204: 5203: 5182: 5181: 5180: 5179: 5178: 5177: 5176: 5175: 5174: 5173: 5150: 5149: 5148: 5147: 5146: 5145: 5130: 5128: 5127: 5126: 5125: 5124: 5123: 5111: 5110: 5109: 5108: 5083: 5082: 5079: 5076: 5073: 5070: 5066: 5065: 5032: 5031: 5030: 5029: 5028: 5027: 5026: 5025: 5024: 5023: 5001: 5000: 4999: 4998: 4997: 4996: 4995: 4994: 4978: 4977: 4976: 4975: 4974: 4973: 4959: 4958: 4957: 4956: 4944: 4943: 4942: 4941: 4928: 4927: 4899: 4898: 4897: 4896: 4895: 4894: 4893: 4892: 4891: 4890: 4889: 4888: 4887: 4886: 4885: 4884: 4883: 4882: 4881: 4880: 4879: 4878: 4877: 4876: 4875: 4874: 4827: 4826: 4825: 4824: 4823: 4822: 4821: 4820: 4819: 4818: 4817: 4816: 4815: 4814: 4813: 4812: 4811: 4810: 4809: 4808: 4807: 4806: 4758: 4756: 4755: 4754: 4753: 4752: 4751: 4750: 4749: 4748: 4747: 4746: 4745: 4744: 4743: 4742: 4741: 4740: 4739: 4712: 4711: 4710: 4709: 4708: 4707: 4706: 4705: 4704: 4703: 4702: 4701: 4700: 4699: 4698: 4697: 4673: 4672: 4671: 4670: 4669: 4668: 4667: 4666: 4665: 4664: 4663: 4662: 4661: 4660: 4593: 4592: 4591: 4590: 4589: 4588: 4587: 4586: 4561: 4560: 4559: 4558: 4557: 4556: 4547: 4526: 4525: 4512: 4511: 4510: 4470: 4467: 4457: 4456: 4449: 4442: 4409: 4408:enough already 4406: 4405: 4404: 4380: 4377: 4376: 4375: 4374: 4373: 4357: 4356: 4345: 4330: 4323:What about it? 4301: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4295: 4294: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4239: 4238: 4215: 4177: 4174: 4173: 4172: 4158: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4044: 4043: 4042: 4041: 4032: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3996: 3995: 3994: 3993: 3961: 3878: 3877: 3876: 3875: 3874: 3873: 3872: 3871: 3851: 3811: 3810: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3793: 3792: 3791: 3750: 3749: 3748: 3747: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3743: 3742: 3741: 3719: 3718: 3717: 3716: 3715: 3714: 3713: 3712: 3711: 3710: 3709: 3708: 3707: 3706: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3677: 3676: 3675: 3674: 3673: 3672: 3660: 3659: 3648: 3625: 3624: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3589:recent example 3561: 3560: 3559: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3488: 3439: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3397: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3155: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3129: 3112: 3111: 3057: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3050: 2993: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2965: 2955:203.122.12.245 2945: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2918: 2917: 2907: 2906: 2848: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2836: 2816: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2752: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2741: 2737: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2651: 2650: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2578: 2577: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2314: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2078: 1994: 1969: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1947: 1946: 1931:Ferdia O'Brien 1898: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1750: 1673:tropical storm 1670: 1663: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1611:Hurricane Dean 1606: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1541: 1540: 1530: 1529: 1517: 1515: 1514: 1504: 1503: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1234: 1233: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1189: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 950:89.120.193.125 924: 897: 894: 893: 892: 864: 861: 860: 859: 834: 833: 819: 818: 817: 799: 798: 797: 753: 741: 740: 739: 695: 694:News and stuff 692: 691: 690: 671: 670: 669: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 621: 620: 619: 618: 613: 607: 606: 564: 561: 560: 559: 558: 557: 526: 523: 522: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 476:Applejuicefool 453:Applejuicefool 448: 445: 444: 443: 432: 429: 428: 427: 426: 425: 424: 423: 409: 408: 407: 406: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 322: 321: 320: 319: 318: 317: 298: 297: 296: 295: 273: 260: 225: 222: 221: 220: 210: 209: 160: 157: 155: 153: 152: 138: 137: 136: 127:hack added to 115:190.80.151.146 110: 107: 105: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 18:Talk:Main Page 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5381: 5366: 5363: 5359: 5358: 5357: 5356: 5355: 5354: 5349: 5346: 5342: 5341: 5340: 5339: 5336: 5333: 5329: 5325: 5324: 5323: 5322: 5319: 5296: 5293: 5289: 5288: 5287: 5284: 5280: 5278: 5275: 5271: 5270: 5265: 5264: 5263: 5262: 5261: 5260: 5259: 5258: 5257: 5256: 5255: 5254: 5253: 5252: 5251: 5250: 5235: 5232: 5228: 5227: 5226: 5225: 5224: 5223: 5222: 5221: 5220: 5219: 5218: 5217: 5216: 5215: 5202: 5199: 5194: 5193: 5192: 5191: 5190: 5189: 5188: 5187: 5186: 5185: 5184: 5183: 5172: 5169: 5165: 5160: 5159: 5158: 5157: 5156: 5155: 5154: 5153: 5152: 5151: 5144: 5141: 5137: 5136: 5135: 5134: 5133: 5132: 5131: 5121: 5117: 5116: 5115: 5114: 5113: 5112: 5107: 5104: 5099: 5095: 5094: 5093: 5092: 5091: 5090: 5087: 5080: 5077: 5074: 5071: 5068: 5067: 5063: 5062: 5061: 5058: 5054: 5050: 5046: 5041: 5038: 5022: 5019: 5015: 5011: 5010: 5009: 5008: 5007: 5006: 5005: 5004: 5003: 5002: 4993: 4990: 4986: 4985: 4984: 4983: 4982: 4981: 4980: 4979: 4972: 4969: 4965: 4964: 4963: 4962: 4961: 4960: 4955: 4952: 4948: 4947: 4946: 4945: 4940: 4937: 4932: 4931: 4930: 4929: 4926: 4923: 4919: 4915: 4911: 4910: 4909: 4908: 4905: 4873: 4870: 4865: 4864: 4863: 4860: 4856: 4851: 4850: 4849: 4848: 4847: 4846: 4845: 4844: 4843: 4842: 4841: 4840: 4839: 4838: 4837: 4836: 4835: 4834: 4833: 4832: 4831: 4830: 4829: 4828: 4805: 4802: 4798: 4794: 4793: 4792: 4789: 4784: 4779: 4778: 4777: 4776: 4775: 4774: 4773: 4772: 4771: 4770: 4769: 4768: 4767: 4766: 4765: 4764: 4763: 4762: 4761: 4760: 4759: 4738: 4735: 4730: 4729: 4728: 4727: 4726: 4725: 4724: 4723: 4722: 4721: 4720: 4719: 4718: 4717: 4716: 4715: 4714: 4713: 4696: 4693: 4689: 4688: 4687: 4686: 4685: 4684: 4683: 4682: 4681: 4680: 4679: 4678: 4677: 4676: 4675: 4674: 4659: 4656: 4652: 4648: 4644: 4640: 4639: 4638: 4634: 4629: 4625: 4621: 4616: 4615: 4614: 4611: 4607: 4603: 4602: 4601: 4600: 4599: 4598: 4597: 4596: 4595: 4594: 4585: 4582: 4577: 4574:, I mean for 4573: 4569: 4568: 4567: 4566: 4565: 4564: 4563: 4562: 4555: 4552: 4548: 4546: 4543: 4542:Corvus cornix 4539: 4538: 4537: 4534: 4530: 4529: 4528: 4527: 4524: 4521: 4517: 4513: 4509: 4505: 4500: 4496: 4495: 4494: 4491: 4490:Corvus cornix 4487: 4483: 4482: 4481: 4480: 4477: 4468: 4466: 4465: 4462: 4454: 4450: 4447: 4443: 4440: 4436: 4435: 4434: 4431: 4428: 4424: 4420: 4413: 4407: 4403: 4400: 4396: 4392: 4391: 4390: 4389: 4386: 4378: 4372: 4369: 4365: 4361: 4360: 4359: 4358: 4354: 4348: 4343: 4339: 4335: 4331: 4329: 4326: 4322: 4321: 4320: 4317: 4313: 4312:64.39.113.228 4309: 4299: 4293: 4290: 4286: 4285: 4284: 4281: 4280: 4275: 4270: 4263: 4262: 4261: 4260: 4254: 4237: 4234: 4233: 4228: 4223: 4216: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4207: 4203: 4199: 4198: 4197: 4194: 4190: 4189:129.46.78.177 4186: 4175: 4171: 4168: 4164: 4159: 4157: 4154: 4150: 4146: 4142: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4131: 4126: 4120: 4110: 4107: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4094: 4089: 4088: 4080: 4076: 4072: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4063: 4058: 4057: 4049: 4040: 4037: 4033: 4031: 4028: 4023: 4022: 4021: 4018: 4017: 4010: 4009: 4004: 4003: 3992: 3989: 3988: 3983: 3978: 3971: 3970: 3969: 3966: 3962: 3960: 3957: 3956: 3951: 3946: 3939: 3938: 3937: 3933: 3928: 3927: 3926: 3923: 3922: 3917: 3912: 3905: 3904: 3903: 3900: 3897: 3894: 3892: 3889: 3888: 3887: 3886: 3883: 3870: 3867: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3857: 3852: 3849: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3840: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3830: 3826: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3820: 3816: 3809: 3806: 3803: 3798: 3797: 3790: 3787: 3782: 3781: 3780: 3777: 3773: 3768: 3767: 3766: 3762: 3761: 3756: 3752: 3751: 3740: 3736: 3735: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3723: 3722: 3721: 3720: 3705: 3702: 3699: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3671: 3668: 3664: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3657: 3651: 3646: 3642: 3638: 3634: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3623: 3619: 3618: 3612: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3602: 3599: 3594: 3590: 3586: 3582: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3573: 3572: 3567: 3563: 3562: 3549: 3545: 3544: 3538: 3537: 3536: 3533: 3530: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3520: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3510: 3507: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3496: 3495: 3489: 3487: 3483: 3482: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3469: 3465: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3448: 3447: 3437: 3427: 3424: 3420: 3416: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3405: 3394: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3373: 3369: 3365: 3361: 3357: 3353: 3349: 3348:SA Guidelines 3345: 3341: 3338: 3334: 3331: 3330: 3329: 3326: 3321: 3311: 3308: 3307:38.112.225.84 3304: 3303: 3302: 3299: 3296: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3286: 3283: 3280: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3263: 3259: 3255: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3246: 3245:38.112.225.84 3241: 3240: 3239: 3236: 3233: 3229: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3216: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3206: 3205: 3195: 3191: 3187: 3184: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3175: 3171: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3161: 3156: 3154: 3151: 3147: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3138: 3134: 3133: 3128: 3125: 3124:24.22.163.169 3120: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3110: 3107: 3104: 3101: 3098: 3097: 3092: 3088: 3086: 3082: 3078: 3077: 3076:Prague Spring 3072: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3066: 3065:New Babylon 2 3062: 3055: 3049: 3046: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3037: 3036: 3031: 3026: 3019: 3015: 3014: 3013: 3010: 3006: 3002: 2991: 2987: 2984: 2980: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2970: 2963: 2960: 2956: 2952: 2941: 2938: 2934: 2930: 2926: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2916: 2913: 2909: 2908: 2905: 2902: 2901: 2896: 2891: 2884: 2877: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2864: 2863:68.248.235.36 2860: 2859: 2854: 2846: 2841: 2837: 2835: 2832: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2822: 2814: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2790: 2786: 2782: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2750: 2745: 2744: 2738: 2735: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2725: 2721: 2710: 2707: 2703: 2702:round numbers 2699: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2672: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2661: 2657: 2649: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2632: 2629: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2620: 2615: 2609: 2606: 2601: 2596: 2590: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2576: 2573: 2571: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2559: 2555: 2546: 2543: 2538: 2534: 2530: 2527: 2522: 2518: 2515: 2514: 2504: 2500: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2478: 2473: 2468: 2462: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2454: 2449: 2444: 2440: 2437: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2428: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2418: 2395: 2392: 2390: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2379: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2369: 2367: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2356: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2347: 2346: 2341: 2340: 2334: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2322: 2319: 2315: 2313: 2310: 2309: 2304: 2303: 2297: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2285: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2266: 2263: 2262: 2257: 2256: 2250: 2243: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2220: 2214: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2192: 2186: 2159: 2156: 2155: 2150: 2145: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2133: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2124: 2123: 2118: 2113: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2101: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2077: 2074: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2065: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2056: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2047: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2025: 2020: 2015: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2004: 2000: 1995: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1975: 1967: 1961: 1958: 1954: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1945: 1940: 1932: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1921: 1920:293.xx.xxx.xx 1916: 1915: 1911: 1908: 1907: 1902: 1896: 1892: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1878: 1860: 1857: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1847: 1846: 1841: 1836: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1824: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1815: 1812:.... :-) -- 1811: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1802: 1801: 1796: 1791: 1784: 1780: 1777: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1768: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1759: 1755: 1754:Windocentrism 1751: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1735: 1728: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1719: 1714: 1709: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1697: 1696: 1691: 1686: 1679: 1674: 1669: 1661: 1655: 1652: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1616: 1612: 1604: 1596: 1593: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1578: 1575: 1571: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1562: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1551: 1547: 1544: 1539: 1536: 1532: 1531: 1528: 1525: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1513: 1510: 1506: 1505: 1502: 1499: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1488: 1484: 1481: 1480: 1478: 1474: 1473:lack of order 1468: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1417: 1414: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1383: 1380: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1352: 1349: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1323: 1320: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1297: 1294: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1276: 1273: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1232: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1210: 1197: 1194: 1190: 1188: 1185: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1176: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1162: 1159: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1150: 1146: 1145: 1140: 1136: 1131: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1122: 1121: 1116: 1111: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1098: 1088: 1085: 1084: 1079: 1074: 1065: 1064: 1061: 1047: 1044: 1043: 1038: 1033: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1020: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1011: 1010: 1005: 1000: 993: 992:British Isles 990: 989: 988: 985: 980: 979: 978: 975: 974: 969: 964: 956: 955: 954: 951: 947: 946: 945: 942: 940: 934: 930: 925: 923: 920: 917: 916:Satanic songs 913: 909: 908: 907: 906: 903: 895: 891: 888: 884: 880: 876: 875: 874: 873: 870: 862: 858: 855: 851: 847: 845: 840: 836: 835: 832: 829: 827: 820: 816: 812: 808: 804: 800: 796: 792: 786: 785: 784: 779: 775: 765: 764: 763: 759: 754: 752: 749: 745: 742: 738: 732: 727: 726: 718: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 706: 700: 693: 689: 686: 682: 681: 680: 679: 676: 660: 659: 658: 655: 651: 650: 649: 646: 645: 640: 635: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 617: 614: 611: 610: 609: 608: 605: 602: 598: 597: 596: 592: 588: 584: 580: 572: 570: 562: 556: 553: 549: 548: 547: 544: 540: 539: 538: 536: 532: 524: 514: 511: 507: 503: 499: 494: 493: 492: 489: 486: 482: 481: 480: 477: 473: 472: 471: 468: 464: 460: 459: 458: 457: 454: 446: 441: 440: 435: 434: 430: 422: 419: 415: 414: 413: 412: 411: 410: 405: 402: 398: 397: 396: 393: 389: 388: 387: 386: 383: 366: 363: 359: 358: 357: 352: 348: 339: 338: 337: 334: 330: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 316: 313: 309: 304: 303: 302: 301: 300: 299: 294: 291: 287: 286: 285: 282: 278: 274: 272: 269: 265: 261: 259: 254: 250: 241: 240: 239: 238: 235: 231: 223: 219: 216: 212: 211: 208: 205: 198: 197: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 171: 167: 164: 158: 156: 151: 148: 145: 142: 141: 130: 126: 122: 121: 120: 119: 116: 108: 106: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5327: 5326:Correction, 5315: 5268: 5267: 5168:Badgerpatrol 5163: 5129: 5119: 5103:Badgerpatrol 5097: 5084: 5033: 5018:Badgerpatrol 4922:Badgerpatrol 4900: 4869:Badgerpatrol 4854: 4801:Badgerpatrol 4782: 4757: 4734:Badgerpatrol 4623: 4619: 4575: 4571: 4551:Badgerpatrol 4498: 4472: 4461:Monotonehell 4458: 4432: 4423:74.73.104.65 4414: 4411: 4382: 4303: 4289:Monotonehell 4265: 4245: 4218: 4179: 4115: 4083: 4052: 4045: 4015: 4007: 3973: 3941: 3907: 3879: 3812: 3759: 3733: 3696: 3616: 3596:that goal. 3584: 3570: 3542: 3493: 3480: 3445: 3441: 3414: 3392: 3355: 3332: 3261: 3222:as the 14th 3213: 3197: 3193: 3095: 3094: 3084: 3074: 3063: 3059: 3021: 2995: 2969:70.71.66.203 2964: 2946: 2886: 2856: 2853:Heath Ledger 2850: 2818: 2754: 2740: 2739: 2719: 2717: 2688:Monotonehell 2652: 2628:Monotonehell 2619:Tim Q. Wells 2588: 2569: 2558:Monotonehell 2551: 2536: 2506: 2485: 2414: 2388: 2365: 2355:Tim Q. Wells 2335: 2329: 2298: 2292: 2251: 2245: 2241: 2182: 2140: 2108: 2081: 2073:Monotonehell 2055:Tim Q. Wells 2046:Monotonehell 2037:Tim Q. Wells 2032: 2003:Monotonehell 1971: 1917: 1913: 1912: 1909: 1904: 1903: 1900: 1880:69.33.74.119 1831: 1786: 1753: 1681: 1615:69.33.74.119 1608: 1548: 1545: 1542: 1516: 1485: 1482: 1476: 1472: 1470: 1469: 1466: 1206: 1128:Admittedly, 1106: 1093: 1069: 1028: 995: 959: 938: 928: 902:81.158.49.74 899: 866: 852:. Thanks. -- 843: 825: 802: 721: 701: 697: 672: 654:Monotonehell 630: 615: 601:Monotonehell 573: 566: 528: 497: 450: 447:Merv Griffin 436: 418:Steve Dufour 392:Steve Dufour 382:Steve Dufour 379: 312:Steve Dufour 234:Steve Dufour 227: 183:74.14.133.63 172: 168: 165: 162: 159:Odd problems 154: 112: 104: 78: 43: 37: 4417:—Preceding 4306:—Preceding 4036:69.95.50.15 3802:violet/riga 3423:Ancheta Wis 3183:24.2.176.64 3146:my birthday 3016:Please use 3005:66.9.52.174 2923:What about 2803:74.14.16.71 2427:69.115.13.5 2378:Elmer Clark 2185:a test page 2100:69.115.13.5 1999:ten fingers 1974:69.115.13.5 1752:Talk about 1678:go this way 1671:but only a 1224:ailuromancy 887:PrimeHunter 844:In the news 801:What? Who 703:really?!?-- 577:—Preceding 535:Slovak Wiki 485:violet/riga 177:—Preceding 98:Archive 110 90:Archive 107 85:Archive 106 79:Archive 105 73:Archive 104 68:Archive 103 60:Archive 100 36:This is an 5049:Louiseryan 5037:Louiseryan 4655:Algebraist 4610:Algebraist 3819:Richard001 3731:practice. 3254:this admin 3226:." But if 3096:August 20' 2821:Richard001 2641:suggestion 2503:three days 2228:Antimatter 2086:Antimatter 1984:Antimatter 1774:LOL. 8D -- 1642:ImmunolPhD 984:Vbdrummer0 807:Antimatter 717:WP:OBVIOUS 675:psycho_NIX 583:Psycho NIX 550:Done. --- 467:David Levy 230:Saint Roch 5345:Nil Einne 5318:Nil Einne 5292:Nil Einne 4797:this page 4572:most part 4395:WP:ERRORS 4366:! Rats!! 4145:CarrotMan 4119:keep cool 3965:Nil Einne 3882:Borisblue 3585:ignore it 3415:something 3393:boldfaced 3333:Thankyou. 3325:Nil Einne 3018:WP:ERRORS 2937:Nil Einne 2925:this guy? 2840:WP:ERRORS 2724:TaylorLTD 2660:Nil Einne 2321:Nil Einne 2205:MZMcBride 2132:Nil Einne 2064:Nil Einne 1856:Nil Einne 1823:Nil Einne 1767:Nil Einne 1668:hurricane 1574:Nil Einne 1561:Nil Einne 1413:Nil Einne 1220:extispicy 1193:Nil Einne 1019:Nil Einne 933:this song 437:Moved to 401:Nil Einne 362:Nil Einne 333:Nil Einne 281:Nil Einne 5362:Tourskin 5332:Tourskin 5283:Tourskin 5274:Tourskin 5164:everyone 5140:Tourskin 5057:contribs 5045:unsigned 4989:Tourskin 4951:Tourskin 4936:Tourskin 4918:bollocks 4914:bullocks 4904:Tourskin 4859:Tourskin 4855:de facto 4788:Tourskin 4620:de facto 4576:de facto 4499:de facto 4453:criteria 4439:Wikinews 4419:unsigned 4368:Tourskin 4325:Tourskin 4308:unsigned 4185:unsigned 4086:howcheng 4055:howcheng 3273:such as 3056:I object 3001:unsigned 2983:Fyre2387 2951:unsigned 2947:Thanks 2799:unsigned 2789:WP:ITN/C 2734:whatever 1756:!!!!! -- 1747:WP:ITN/C 1651:Fyre2387 1638:Fyre2387 1629:Fyre2387 1625:WP:ITN/C 1255:contribs 1247:Tourskin 1243:unsigned 724:howcheng 591:contribs 579:unsigned 191:contribs 179:unsigned 123:It is a 4968:Atropos 4653:above. 4645:at the 4624:de jure 4163:Veledan 4106:Atropos 4075:WT:POTD 3896:Zzyzx11 3856:Atropos 3829:Atropos 3786:Atropos 3772:WP:SELF 3760:Johntex 3755:WP:SELF 3734:Johntex 3701:Atropos 3698:future. 3667:Atropos 3617:Johntex 3571:Johntex 3543:Johntex 3519:Atropos 3494:Johntex 3481:Johntex 3478:credit. 3446:Johntex 3368:Feynman 3337:Atropos 3295:Zzyzx11 3282:Zzyzx11 3232:Zzyzx11 3220:elected 3160:Atropos 3148:then? 3137:Atropos 3103:Zzyzx11 2912:Atropos 2876:cleanup 2831:Atropos 2755:Should 2680:my edit 2542:Atropos 2526:Atropos 2490:Atropos 2436:Atropos 2417:Atropos 2332:Boricua 2295:Boricua 2284:Atropos 2248:Boricua 1957:Raul654 1810:catfish 1662:Dean is 1609:How is 1605:Curious 1509:Atropos 1498:Atropos 1348:Atropos 1293:Atropos 1228:Atropos 1184:Raul654 1149:Raul654 919:Raul654 748:RockMFR 685:Atropos 552:RockMFR 531:Wwooter 290:Atropos 144:Zzyzx11 39:archive 5231:Dacium 4633:Verrai 4520:PFHLai 4504:Verrai 4476:Flonto 4385:Niyant 4364:Jordan 4300:jordan 4268:Howard 4221:Howard 4206:17Drew 4079:WT:FPC 4048:before 3976:Howard 3944:Howard 3932:Verrai 3910:Howard 3899:(Talk) 3866:17Drew 3839:17Drew 3815:WP:OWN 3776:17Drew 3598:17Drew 3529:Banyan 3506:Banyan 3298:(Talk) 3285:(Talk) 3262:before 3235:(Talk) 3203:abjotu 3174:17Drew 3150:17Drew 3106:(Talk) 3024:Howard 2889:Howard 2706:cloviz 2671:cloviz 2512:abjotu 2244:it. -- 2143:Howard 2111:Howard 2018:master 1888:PFHLai 1834:Howard 1814:PFHLai 1789:Howard 1776:PFHLai 1758:PFHLai 1684:Howard 1680:... -- 1135:Verrai 1109:Howard 1072:Howard 1031:Howard 998:Howard 962:Howard 929:really 896:Stamps 869:N734LQ 854:PFHLai 791:Verrai 758:Verrai 705:Dacium 633:Howard 502:WT:ITN 268:PFHLai 264:Beagle 215:PFHLai 147:(Talk) 5014:WP:CB 4342:GeeJo 4336:. Or 4252:notes 4249:Grace 4246:Yes. 4153:Enuja 4149:GeeJo 4124:Καροτ 4008:zoney 3645:GeeJo 3614:DYK. 3350:(for 3200:tariq 3045:Bazza 2720:today 2686:? -- 2509:tariq 2448:Jeltz 2218:Laïka 2190:Laïka 2033:might 2013:Grand 1158:Lovok 1027::) -- 958::p -- 803:cares 683:Yes. 629::p -- 533:from 203:Laïka 16:< 5328:Most 5053:talk 4916:and 4446:here 4427:talk 4399:Anon 4397:. -- 4393:Try 4332:Try 4316:talk 4278:Duck 4231:Duck 4200:See 4193:talk 4093:chat 4077:and 4062:chat 4016:talk 3986:Duck 3954:Duck 3920:Duck 3591:). 3532:Tree 3509:Tree 3468:talk 3277:and 3218:was 3034:Duck 3009:talk 2959:talk 2931:and 2899:Duck 2807:talk 2736:.... 2537:mind 2452:talk 2344:ddie 2307:ddie 2260:ddie 2242:love 2232:talk 2153:Duck 2121:Duck 2090:talk 2082:BOLD 2001:. -- 1988:talk 1953:This 1939:Talk 1844:Duck 1799:Duck 1741:And 1731:Tito 1694:Duck 1251:talk 1119:Duck 1082:Duck 1041:Duck 1008:Duck 972:Duck 850:this 813:--- 811:talk 778:talk 746:--- 731:chat 715:See 643:Duck 587:talk 504:and 465:. — 351:talk 253:talk 187:talk 5269:THE 5098:not 4783:not 4347:(c) 4273:the 4226:the 4204:. 4141:own 4129:Μαν 3981:the 3949:the 3915:the 3805:(t) 3650:(c) 3639:or 3464:501 3462:ETS 3356:day 3275:BBC 3194:are 3029:the 2894:the 2775:or 2682:to 2234:-- 2148:the 2116:the 2092:-- 1990:-- 1839:the 1808:Or 1794:the 1689:the 1664:n't 1627:.-- 1222:or 1114:the 1077:the 1067:--> 1036:the 1003:the 967:the 809:--- 774:501 772:ETS 638:the 510:Joe 488:(t) 347:501 345:ETS 249:501 247:ETS 125:CSS 5059:). 5055:• 4608:. 4351:• 4165:• 4081:. 3763:\ 3757:. 3737:\ 3654:• 3620:\ 3574:\ 3546:\ 3497:\ 3484:\ 3449:\ 3083:, 2879:}} 2873:{{ 2809:) 2783:, 2771:, 2767:, 2763:, 2759:, 2722:. 2240:I 2230:-- 2088:-- 2023:ka 1986:-- 1929:-- 1749:.) 1733:xd 1666:a 1640:? 1253:• 1226:. 719:. 589:• 193:) 189:• 135:): 94:→ 64:← 5051:( 4448:. 4425:( 4344:⁄ 4314:( 4256:§ 4191:( 4167:T 4095:} 4091:{ 4064:} 4060:{ 4012:♣ 3647:⁄ 3470:) 3466:( 3460:M 3007:( 2957:( 2805:( 2604:1 2599:H 2594:A 2476:1 2471:H 2466:A 2376:- 2338:e 2301:e 2254:e 1941:) 1937:( 1717:1 1712:H 1707:A 1249:( 788:— 780:) 776:( 770:M 767:— 733:} 729:{ 585:( 353:) 349:( 343:M 255:) 251:( 245:M 185:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index