Knowledge

Talk:Marcel Duchamp/Archive 1

Source đź“ť

230:
Alfred Stieglitz. The exact details of its whereabouts during and immediately after the exhibition are unclear to say the least. Various accounts place it behind a partition in the exhibition, in a skip after it finished (or possibly before), and being taken home by Walter Arensberg himself. The only thing that is known about this "original" is that it was eventually lost. (I must confess that I am amused by the idea that Arensberg hauled this ceramic and iron lump home, only to loose it soon after. How exactly does one misplace a urinal?) The ones that one sees in museums today are (for the most part) not only non-functional, but were never intended to function. In 1964, in partnership with the dealer and his cataloguer, Arturo Schwarz, an edition of eight (plus 2 non-numbered) “Fountains” were produced and offered for sale through the Schwarz Gallery in Milan. In addition to “Fountain,” virtually all of Duchamp’s readymades were offered in similar editions of eight, with (I believe) the full set available for $ 2,000. Industrial draughtsmen were commissioned to create the preparatory drawings required for these “authorized” editions. (This is all in the Schwarz’s The Complete Works of Marcel Duchamp: Revised and Expanded Paperback Edition, Ref# 345d (fountain), & #603-605 (the preparatory drawings))
204:(I've heard that too many times without the evidence of its nonfunctionality produced. To me that remains a rumour) It remains beside the point. In his own words; "Whether Mr. Mutt with his own hands made the fountain or not has no importance. He CHOSE it. He took an ordinary article of life, placed it so that its useful significance disappeared under a new title and point of view -- created a new thought for that object." Though I see your point, and it certainly does seem 'Duchampian' to make a statement like that (confounding the art world by contradicting himself in a comment on it), and yeah, if it were true it would be interesting, my point is, I've heard it a hundred times, but show me *how, why, where, and who checked*. No-one ever has. -- 2441:, Duchamp was obviously involved with the Breton and the surrealists. His involvement included his participation in the exhibition of surrealist objects at Galerie Ratton (1936) the design for Galerie Gradiva's entrance (1937), he was the "generator and arbitrator" for the Exposition Internationale du Surréalisme in 1938, participated in the First Papers of Surrealism (1942), designed the cover for Le Surréalisme en 1947, the cover for Le Surréalisme, même (1956), etc... He never joined the movement though. When Breton published the Manifeste du surréalisme in 1924, Duchamp had already given up making art for playing chess. 2779:, so were the Surrealists "incredibly dogmatic", with Breton excommunicating signed-up members in the papal manner. One sympathises with Marcel for not wishing to join movements whose membership was so fractious. But that is no excuse for WP editors to be fundamentalist in return and demand to see an artist's membership card before sanctioning what his stylistic affinities demonstrate him so clearly to be that art historians unhesitatingly group him with those tendencies. Here on WP we go with the written evidence. I have already cited Passeron's mention of Duchamp in his 3309:"Many" consider Duchamp to have been of what is known today as IM (International Master) strength. There are three international titles of chess proficiency, International Grand Master - GM or IGM, International Master - IM, FIDE Master - FM) while the vast majority of players are untitled. The titles themselves were instituted after Duchamp ended his international chess playing career. While Duchamp may not have made his mark on the international chess scene as such, he was strong enough to play on the French team at three team world championships (Olympiads). 2529:, this is transforming into a paradox - does this mean that he was and he wasn't a Surrealist at the same time, just as Arthur Cravan was and wasn't a Dadaist? If he produced only one or two works in collaboration with Breton and co. then it would be easier, but seeing how he did more than a few Surrealist collaborations, the case seems to be swinging in defense of the template; seeing how the situation is as of yet unresolved, does that mean that in the meantime I am justified in returning the template onto this page? What happens next? 718:
this accurate? Usually considered by whom? If so, it should be cited, since this does not sound accurate to me. The whole section, in fact, needs to be re-written since an excerpt of Dali's introduction to Cabanne's book and a reference to Mike Schneider (the most germane artist to bring up in this section??) do not constitute a substantial, accurate representation of Duchamp's manifold legacy. A chronological survey or reference to movements like Pop Art and artists like Sol Lewitt, I think, might be a good place to begin.
31: 2998:, featuring "Two hundred and twenty-nine artworks by sixty exhibitors from fourteen countries... at this multimedia exhibition." The Surrealists wanted to create an exhibition which in itself would be a creative act, thus working collaboratively in its staging. Marcel Duchamp was named as "Generateur-arbitre", Salvador Dalí and Max Ernst were listed as technical directors, Man Ray was chief lighting technician and 2420:), so I put him back onto it; naturally I assumed that this page should have the template stuck on too, and so I did. Now I see that somebody has thanked me for putting him back onto the template, and someone else has removed it because he was "Not a Surrealist". Reading the non-Dada sections again, however, it seems to me that he was somewhat of a Surrealist - and as a result, I'm rather confused! 822:"Despite the provocative and explicit nature of his work, Duchamp valued the "beauty of indifference" in his private life. His enormous personal charm and easy-going nature attracted many female lovers but few passionate attachments. A brief marriage in 1927 shocked his friends and ended quickly in divorce. A second marriage to Alexina (Teeny) Sattler in 1954 lasted the rest of his life." 2701:, he most certainly didn't qualify as a cubist at the time he wanted to show the painting. The cubists were incredibly dogmatic and the introduction of time in a painting, something they considered "futurist" was anathema to them. Nude descending a staircase was rejected for the 1912 Salon des Indépendants, by his brothers, nota bene. So, in a way, they kicked him out of the movement. 2594:, so does that mean that eventually he was some sort of a Surrealist? Yes, it would be somewhat inconsistent to the "coaxing" sentence, but I would say that to be the close acquaintance of Breton (the one who wrote the Surrealist manifesto if I am not mistaken) despite not actually signing, plus the collaborations already above stated, would be enough to include him in the category. 2250: 2812:, I don't immediately have access to all the sources you mention, but I have read Apollinaire on Duchamp and do not recall him as particularly reliable when it comes to Duchamp. Would you be able to provide a brief excerpt from the sources that shows that those authors consider Duchamp a cubist or, perhaps more germane to this discussion, a surrealist? Thanks, 2667: 2663: 477:
and biographers seem more than willing to take Duchamp at his word on this point. While I beleve that even Duchamp himself describes his condition as a 'minor defect,' I have yet to encounter any other reference that doubts the existance of said condition. Is there any concrete evidence for the doubt expressed in this statement?
2565:
activities of the man who drew up that manifesto. On account of this, a distinguished French art historian has included him as a Surrealist (rather than a precursor or an influence) in an encyclopedia of the subject. Surely that is sufficient to include Duchamp in the template? If it is not, then it is the template (and
2716:
Cubist mold (which would be quite the thing. "Cubist mold" a good name for a poem, painting, and other artwork). The Surrealist thing, I don't really have an opinion on that. It's kind of iffy on both ends of the spectrum, so the decision probably rests on which way it slightly tips. Sources should put that one to bed.
1032:. Tomkins writes thoughout the book about Duchamp advising Peggy Guggenheim, Katherine Dreier, Walter Pach, Arensberg, at least one MOMA director and others. Tompkins, as I recall, asserts that Duchamp's advice influenced their tastes. I don't have page numbers handy - I'd have to comb the book to find them. 1664:
invented that, and Dada was a movement that, at that point, was mainly in France. Also, none of his works, exept Etant donnés (and even that is iffy), were even remotely surreal. The Large Glass and the green box and stuff I think is still coinsidered dadaism. I just think it should be mentioned don't you?
2334:
Works. The comic characters Mutt and Jeff were also supposidly influences on the false identity. Duchamp originally submitted the work to an Independant Artists Gallery (which he was a director of) to agitate the people responsable for hanging the art, (Duchamp hated the organization of the Gallery).
1987:
To be clear and as a major contributor to this article having added much of the above - Duchamp's importance in 20th and 21st century art is manifested by his appropriations and/or other contributions to our understanding of art as something determined by the artist. In other words - It's art because
1663:
From what I remeber marcel duchamp rejected the notion of being eather a Dadaist or a Surrealist. I'm not saying that he isn't associated with the movements, but it should say somewhere that he didn't coinsider himself a part of them. Even though the readymade was pure Dada, he was in America when he
1218:
I agree with you that a section addressing his influence on, and advice to, art collectors would be a good idea. The last sentence does need to be changed; I agree with you about that too. But I think I would slightly modify your suggested version to read something like the following. Tell me if this
862:
Whether he enjoyed his experiences with his many lovers or not, I can't think of any references for that. He did keep going back for more. According to Tompkins there is evidence of many - Sarazin-Lavassor, Teeny, Picabia's ex, Maria Martins, Mary Reynolds, Yvonne Chastel with whom he had a daughter,
476:
I would like to raise a question regarding the first line in the "Société Anonyme" section. It begins, "Escaping service in the First World War on the pretext of a dubious heart condition..." What is/was the justification behind classifying Duchamp's heart condition as "dubious"? Most interviewers
320:
s would chose to include the R. Mutt signature which could easily count as a creative element and make copyright applicable. In other instances of art works including readymades it could be the general assemblage that would be considered creative. To complicate things further, French copyright law is
233:
I think I know the confusion of the found vs. created readymades. Duchamp didn't particularly value the ready-made objects and tended to throw or give them away. So in the early 1960s he had a series of replica custom-made (because toilets, snow shovels, etc. no longer looked liked they did when he
3256:
I'm not sure that the comment about Dali, shit, and Duchamp is worthy of being here. It doesn't add anything to the understanding of Duchamp's works and legacy. It's a triviality and also is just hearsay or gossip (Dali's). Anyway, I have never heard of Verona, but I do know that the artist Piero
2923:
There appears to be conflicting claims as to Duchamp's role in the Surrealist expo. The language in the paragraph is unclear and discusses Dali and then credits Duchamp. I have tried to make the language consistent, introduced new sourced information, and later asked for a reference to clarify. I've
1723:
I was extremely pleased with the presentation on that site, and in comparison, this wiki article is total bollocks. Duchamp's intentions in his work are omitted almost completely. When I intially read this article for the first time I concluded that Duchamp was a failed chess master, not a brilliant
929:
Little Known Fact: Mary Reynolds was involved with Duchamp for several years, interrupted by his brief marriage to Lydie Saracin-Lavassor in 1927. Their relatioship was not an average one in the 1930's, as he pursued a sex life outside of the relationship and urged Reynolds to follow. However, it is
840:
I assume this statement is meant to be funny: "Duchamp enjoyed the companioniship of many women". "Funny" is not, however, our goal. Is there any evidence of his enjoyment? Is there any evidence of "many" women (or only two or three)? It is, in fact, almost easier to argue that the incorrect word in
282:
Photos would be the copyright of the photographer, unless they're outside the relevant time period or released into the public domain. As far as the objects are concerned, this is a subtle legal point. The copyright on the objects was with the manufacturer, so Duchamp may have been in breach himself
2715:
I don't think anyone personally owned the Cubist movement. Its founders and basic followers can, of course, give opinions, but by that time the cat is out of thee bag and, later, reputable sources more-or-less decide who historically did what and what descriptors belong. He seems to fit the sourced
717:
As it stands, the "Legacy" section begins with words that aren't Duchamp's: should this bit of information be placed in this section? Also, introducing this information it states "Duchamp is usually considered to have a negative attitude to later artists who developed the ideas he had initiated" Is
699:
to match. They don't seem to work right for me for some reason though. They still go here, though I pasted the same code you used. Are they not instant? Also, I'm not sure exactly how everything works, and if there are other versions of the redirect. (Gee, redirects are more complicated than I
122:
Recent research has shown that almost all of his so-called 'found' art was actually created by him. His urinal, while appearing to be a standard item, actually is not functional at all and was made from his own design. It seems that Duchamp was making a joke within a joke, by pretending that he was
553:
The main article states at: "Nude Descending a Staircase (Main article: Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2)" the following: "In 1912, Duchamp painted Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 (Nu duscendant un éscalier n° 2), . . ." While I have no actual knowledge of what Duchamp named the painting, I'm
181:
I don't believe that Duchamp 'created' his found objects. This is mainly based on the inability to find identical objects (how hard did you look?). There is quite a lot of evidence, in fact, that he didn't create them. Any number of artists and friends of his were present when he purchased them.
2564:
Surrealism was all about paradox. Duchamp was an art theorist who distrusted academic distinctions and especially the commodification of the arts, which is why he does not fit within either/or definitions. He did not sign up to the Surrealist manifesto but he was a trusted associate in Surrealist
1738:
I rewrote the section on his death, which I felt was a little bit on the sophomoric art-speak poetic side, that it was unclear and repetitive. I also added another citation that supports some clarifying info I included. Another Knowledge contributor keeps reverting it to the previous version. Can
769:
I've been searching for a source for the claim that 'L'opposition et cases conjuguées sont réconciliées' (Opposition and Sister Squares are Reconciled) is plotted on enneagram-like charts. Can't find anything to do with the fact that it's done using enneagram-like charts. Anyone have a source for
291:
In 2000, Hirst's sculpture Hymn (which Saatchi had bought for a reported ÂŁ1m) was given pole position at the show Ant Noises (an anagram of "sensation") in the Saatchi Gallery. Hirst was then sued himself for breach of copyright over this sculpture, which was a 20ft six ton enlargement of his son
229:
I am not sure how many people are aware of this, but claims regarding the nonfunctionality of fountain are dubious at best. The only evidence we have regarding the nature of the object put forth for inclusion in the Society of Independent Artists exhibition is the photograph taken of the item by
2900:
component of his activities, the Surrealism connection has been documented. The question remains, and sources have yet to confirm, whether his connection to Surrealism and his brief participation in several Surrealist events and writings on the topic is/are sufficient to maintain the notion that
271:
Does anyone know about the copyright status for the images representing Duchamp's work? The issue is interesting because of Duchamp's motivation in creating readymades; most of the time he already took mass produced objects, so can we safely say that his objects are not licensed themselves but
1598:
is a policy. So enlargement of images elsewhere is undesirable for the reasons given in the latter. I have no problem with removal of "upright" from the major work illustrated, I should have left it off that one, but I believe it should be returned to the other images which don't require the
2458:
It's true that most of Duchamp's art works relate to Cubism and Dada - he was, after all, older than the Surrealist generation, and was related to other Cubist-influenced artists such as his brothers Jacques Villon and Raymond Duchamp-Villon. However, he is included in René Passeron's
2357:. Because there is already mention of this on those other wiki pages, it doesn't make sense not to at least reference the controversy, and cite the articles. I know there is some discussion of this on the talk section of the Fountain's entry page, but this needs to be updated. 292:
Connor's 14" Young Scientist Anatomy Set designed by Norman Emms, 10,000 of which are sold a year by Hull-based toy manufacturer Humbrol for ÂŁ14.99 each. Hirst paid an undisclosed sum to two charities, Children Nationwide and the Toy Trust in an out-of-court settlement.
137:
says, the artist's assertion and the placing of a readymade in a gallery context is part of what makes the object 'art'. I have a suspicion that Duchamp may have said something of the sort, and similar comments have been made by other artists down the age - recently
2023:
I reverted the addition of 'conceptual' because it suggests that Duchamp's influence was restricted to conceptual art. The sources cited in the article indicate that his influence was wider. However, his influence is most prominent on conceptual art. I suggest
2299:
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on
2751:
Thanks. Duchamp seems to have been a self-admitted Cubist. He may be iffy if 'Staircase' (1912) didn't exist, but with his succinct memory and that iconic cubist painting, then add the sources, and Cubism seems to include this multi-talented chess player.
1699:
You could probably determine this fairly accurately with the catalogue raisonné, but it's very expensive. Or you could write to his estate or whoever manages it, but they can be sort of cagey about that kind of thing because of authentication liability
328:
says, a photograph would also be copyrighted in itself, which would be a problem unless it was old enough for copyright to have expired (unlikely for most Duchamp works) or unless the photographer had was released under a free license such as GFDL. --
1381:
Most images used in visual arts articles are often irregular. The MoS are guidelines not policies, generally we use 300px in the lede and thumb default; sometimes but not always upright default, there is no one way because images and articles are so
461:
I can't decide where to place this photograph on this page (at the top, where it is first mentioned? Under "Readymades?") The people on this page can move it to where they think it is best suited. I also enjoyed reading this discussion page.
1837:
The paragraph about his secret relationship seems to be saying that in 1988 Duchamp (d. 1968) allowed Mary Reynolds (later in that same paragraph said to have died in 1950) to reveal their relationship. Clearly, there is some inaccuracy here.
2546:, we say in the article: "From the mid-1930s onward, he collaborated with the Surrealists; however, he did not join the movement, despite the coaxing of André Breton". It would be inconsistent to add him to a list of members of the movement. 1330:
Would it be possible to add : A Marriage in Check – The Heart of the Bride Stripped Bare by Her Bachelor, Even (Marcel Duchamp and Lydie Fischer Sarazin-Levassor) Lydie Fischer Sarazin-Levassor Les presses du réel – Avant-gardes, Dijon.
412:
Marcel Duchamp is 100 % French and it's not because he lived in the New York that he is "French-American". He was born in Blainville (France), studied in Paris and died in Paris. And he first moved to NYC in 1913 when he was 26...
2075:
In the absence of a source that says Duchamp relinquished his French citizenship, or that someone in his position would have been required to do so, I think we should keep the new text and indicate dual nationality after 1955.
2966:
is lacking specific references considering its length and breadth. It makes the overall point the the expo was collaborative and mentions through out various contributions (e.g. Revolving doors, his mannequin) by
2650:
Arguably, Duchamp was not even a Dadaist. He dislike all "isms". The question is, does one qualify to be a Surrealist simply by participating in several of its group endeavors? A note on Cubism: One of the (if not
3008:
The following remains unsourced and I would suggest removing it becuase it is a) contradictory (stating Breton placed it, then therefore Duchamp confronted guests?) b) unsourced, and c) about 2 other artists.
2943:
I see the sourced info I added was due to my error. It was from an expo of the same name, organised with Breton and Duchamp in 1947. I will reword and re-position this, reverting also to language I changed.
845:
enjoyed the company of many women" -- though it is, perhaps, more relevant to remind our readers that "Duchamp also did not enjoy the company of many women" -- which, in order to force the issue, I have just
307:
Note however, that copyright generally only applies to 'creative' works. AFIK many everyday objects wouldn't qualify for copyright protection. However, in the UK at least, there is the related concept of a
2463:(1975, English translation 1984), not only on account of his active participation in the Surrealist exhibitions (to which he contributed environments), but also his involvement with Breton in editing both 853:
It was not intended to be funny. It was intended to convey that Duchamp had many female lovers over the course of his life. I may have written it over euphamistically perhaps, but humor was not intended.
1685:
I received an email from someone and he inquired as to how many official works Duchamp produced during circa 1908 to 1923. Does anybody know and would it not be worth posting in the article? Thanks! --
164:
As I understand it, it is this shift of meaning from representation and the intention of the artist to the interpretation of the viewer, which is part of the lasting significance of Duchamp's work. --
2342: 1152:
I suppose ultimately a section about his advise to collectors is needed. Anyhow, we can take out my commented comment for one thing. :) In that last sentence I think we can be more to the point...
627:(1915-23), which was, according to the best reconstructions that have been attempted, already in his mind several years earlier when certain commentators, perhaps most notably the Duchamp scholar 2376:"Joseph Nechvatal has cast a considerable light on The Large Glass by noting " - this is at best a very subjective statement, at worst some questionable publicity on a particular art theorist 920:) the entry for July 31, 1924 describes an orgy that Duchamp had with three women, Yvonne Chastel, Mimi, and Jeanne. The next day Duchamp indicated to Henri Pierre Roche that he did enjoy it. 2335:
Even though he (R.Mutt) paid the full price entitling him to 2 exhibits they wouldnt display Fountain, and so (after briefly losing the work) Duchamp wrote an articile in defence of "R.Mutt"
1002:"Duchamp's output had considerable influence on the development of post-World War I Western art, and whose advice to modern art collectors helped shape the tastes of the Western art world." 2296:
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
2737:(p. 27), Duchamp said: "Cubism interested me for only a few months. At the end of 1912 I was already thinking of something else. So it was a form of experiment, more than a conviction." 2071: 1566:
templates display images that would otherwise be unreasonably wide or tall. Examples where adjusting the size may be appropriate include, but are not limited to, the following:...
2890:(exhibited at most of the major Cubist exhibitions) and all the relevant literature and reliable sources. Many of those sources are already present in the Duchamp article and the 3182:
What about his relationship with Maria Martins being named among the women? Wasn't Etant Donnés originally dedicated to her? If nothing else, that makes her significant. -LE
913:
Duchamp did enjoy the companionship of many women. There is one such occasion documented. In the "Ephemerides" section of "Marcel Duchamp: Work and Life" (The MIT Press, 1993,
570:
The influence of Stirner is well documented. As is his non-support of World War I. But, in peer-reviewed/published books is there discussion of his identifying with anarchism?
2412:
off the "Surrealist" template; afterwards I closely read this specific article, and noticed several mentions of Andre Breton and the other Surrealists ("collaborated with the
2471:, where 'works' of his also appeared. While categorising Duchamp as a French Surrealist artist may not be entirely accurate, he certainly belongs in the Surrealism category. 554:
quite positive that there is no word "duscendant" in the French language. The correct present participle would be "descendant" in French. Eric C. 10:53, 27 Oct 2006 (UTC)
2066:, an unregistered editor indicated that Duchamp retained his French citizenship until his death, and that he had dual citizenship after taking US citizenship in 1955. The 234:
originally did the ready-mades) for display in museums. A bit ironic that the ready-made we see in the museum is actually a limited-edition custom-made object. - Ethan Ham
3135:
Jubiläums-Ausstellung Mannheim 1907 : Internationale Kunst- und Grosse Gartenbau-Ausstellung, vom 1. Mai bis 20. Oktober : offizieller Katalog der Gartenbau-Ausstellung /
979:
I added a para in Turns to Chess section. If anyone would want to add the diagram of the composition here is the code in FEN: 1r6/1PR5/5p2/1P5p/5K2/8/6k1/8 w - - 0 1 --
747:
Very nice article. I'm about to assess it as B-class in all the WikiProject tags, and add a chess WP tag, but would encourage the editors of the articles to aim for
2191: 2187: 2173: 2149: 1972:
He may be overrated as an artist, but these sources make it clear that he has been immensely influential, and this influence is not restricted to conceptual art.
1719:
It is interesting to note that this wiki article tackles NONE of the most important aspects of Duchamp's works, which can be condensed much more than there is on
623: 107:
wasn't the idea behind to urinal to challenge conceptions of what constituted art? -- the idea being that it was, essentially, just a urinal. But because it was
1530:) resizes an image to approximately the given multiple of a user's preferred width. An image should generally be no more than 500 pixels tall and 400 pixels (" 2787:, Guillaume Apollinaire in his article on "The Beginnings of Cubism", for example. The documents can be found in Edward F. Fry's Thames & Hudson book on 2983: 2963: 2611:, In my opinion, Duchamp should not be categorized as a surrealist (nor a cubist for that matter), but maybe you could post a notice of this discussion at 1432:
You really need to have more respect for the policies and guidelines. They are here to help Knowledge have a more consistent presentation across articles.
2026:"Duchamp has had an immense impact on twentieth-century and twenty first-century art and he had a seminal influence on the development of conceptual art." 1916:
As I had hoped was clear from my summary, I was referring to the reference cited at the end of the paragraph. This is from the Metropolital Museum of Art
321:
notably more encompassing than in most territories and has few of the common exceptions, so you would need an international copyright lawyer to be sure.
2293: 2289: 2266: 397:
Edited the article because Marcel plays chess with Man Ray in the film, NOT Francis Picabia. There are many still images on the internet to prove this.--
2277:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with 419: 2346: 3204:
Yes, Calvin Tomkin book about Duchamp has a chapter called Maria. He did some other pieces using her as model, muse and sometimes, mold. -OF
2633: 2612: 2301: 2274: 1921:"His most striking, iconoclastic gesture, the readymade, is arguably the century's most influential development on artists' creative process." 3333: 3149: 2159: 3310: 2383: 2139: 1534:") wide, so it can be comfortably displayed next to the text on the smallest monitors in common use; an image can be wider if it uses the " 795: 3189: 2636:. I didn't really know how to word it, so it may be a bit vague, but I hope it's sufficient to be understood. Thank you for the advice! 2305: 2129: 937: 431: 157:
encourage the viewer to see the 'found' object in a new light (when visiting the urinals in many pubs, I'm often reminded of Duchamp's
3290: 3264: 3211: 2892: 2657: 1343: 1960:"Looking back over the last hundred years as a whole, Duchamp now is widely regarded as the most influential artist of the century." 655:
redirects here, but there's nothing about it in the article. There should be something added here, or change the redirect(s) to the
3024:
rigged to produce a drizzle of water down the inside of its windows, with a shark-headed creature in the driver's seat, and a blond
2169:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
917: 867: 530: 3329: 3246: 1923:
This is clearly saying that Duchamp had an immense impact of twentieth-century art. It does not restrict this to conceptual art.
621:
The notorious antiartist seems to have made a significant break with his former concerns just when he was formulating his work,
283:(or probably would be nowadays), if his rendition did not significantly creatively alter the original to create a new work. See 2150:
https://web.archive.org/web/20081004024543/http://www.centrepompidou.fr/education/ressources/ENS-Duchamp_en/ENS-duchamp_en.html
2846:
assert that Duchamp was either "a cubist" or "a surrealist" and then we can determine whether the claim holds on its merits.
1949: 2338:
Duchamp also stated that the act of chosing the object was the artists work, and its title also made the object an artwork.
1937:
his Fountain was voted "the most influential artwork of the 20th century" by a panel of prominent artists and art historians
387: 1858:
Duchamp allowed Mary Reynolds to reveal their complicated—and heretofore secret—ongoing 20-year relationship.<ref: -->
1594:
I have no problem with lead images being 300px, I always leave them that way. But the MoS is only a guideline, while the
2350: 2234: 670: 2153: 1901:"See cited ref: " the readymade, is arguably the century’s most influential development on artists’ creative process". 957: 1599:
additional detail. The point of the IUP is that every reader has the ability to click on the image for more detail.
1050: 316:, it is plausible that the underlying urinal would not be copyrightable, although most photographs of the recreated 3079: 3057: 3047:(The most beautiful streets of Paris) filled one side of the lobby with mannequins dressed by various Surrealists. 2949: 2933: 2353:
there is discussion of this, as well as note that another possible candidate for the Fountain's actual designer is
2278: 2262: 752: 38: 3166:
earlier I added a todo (* needs mention of the scandal of "The Nude Descending a Staircase" at the Armory Show. --
2641: 2599: 2534: 2428: 2417: 2349:
discuss the evidence that the Fountain was actually created by the Dadaist Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven. On the
2444:
I think it would be fair, and I think we have sources to back that up (Tomkins), to say that he was peripheral.
2190:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
3314: 2387: 1961: 1671: 799: 182:
Though it *would* be interesting if he had, I think it's a flight of fancy, and frankly, beside the point. --
3193: 3109: 3294: 3268: 3215: 3032:
in the back. In this way Duchamp confronted guests entering the exhibition, who were in full evening dress.
2843: 2285: 2257: 2225: 2107: 1499:"), or another size may be fixed. The default thumbnail width is 220 pixels; users can adjust this in their 1347: 941: 863:
Beatrice Wood, and more. (Tompkins, Calvin (1996). Duchamp: A Biography, U.S.: Henry Holt and Company, Inc.
427: 3242: 2906: 2675: 2103: 1729: 1067: 965: 748: 701: 660: 2976:
I would recommend adopting the specific language from this article to explain the roles given to artists:
2160:
https://web.archive.org/web/20040816123824/http://www.tate.org.uk/onlineevents/archive/duchamp_legacy.htm
1667: 273: 3170:
05:29, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)), but I'd skimmed over the section -- it's already there. Off to bed for me! --
3075: 3053: 2945: 2929: 2796: 2574: 2513: 2476: 2362: 2330:
Another pun on R.Mutt, R stood for Richard, french slang for moneybags. The urinal was also bought from
2209:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2197: 2140:
https://web.archive.org/web/20121027213202/http://www.toutfait.com/online_journal_details.php?postid=866
2081: 2032: 1977: 1945:"Regarded by many in the art world as the most influential artist of the century" (Duchamp:A biography. 618:, the study of which Duchamp considered the turning point in his artistic and intellectual development. 423: 398: 2106:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2073: 1843: 788:
and the solution can be found in IM David Levy's book How Computers Play Chess. -- (December 8, 2007)
719: 2070:
doesn't help with this. The following sources indicate that both countries recognize dual citizenship.
1956: 784:
Could someone please add a page for the Lasker-Reichelm Position? The basic position can be found at
153:
With the urinal, Duchamp also displayed it turned around and mounted horizontally. This and the title
3286: 3260: 3238: 3234: 3207: 3185: 2757: 2721: 2689: 2637: 2608: 2595: 2543: 2530: 2438: 2424: 2379: 2130:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080320203734/http://www.artscienceresearchlab.org/articles/panorama.htm
1818: 1767: 1339: 1013:
There very well may be a source for this, but I don't see one obviously placed after that assertion.
984: 933: 791: 2341:
There should be language in this entry regarding the doubt around the Urinal's proper credit. This
2261:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
1739:
someone else weigh in on this issue in some way to get it resolved? Would be gratefully appreciated.
2817: 2742: 2706: 2620: 2551: 2497: 2449: 2358: 2316: 2047: 2011: 1993: 1864: 1796: 1782: 1618: 1571: 1560: 1550: 1455: 1423: 1387: 1269: 1119: 614: 463: 382: 47: 17: 1839: 1334: 841:
this sentence is "Duchamp". Perhaps the easiest editorial correction is to simply point out that "
205: 196: 183: 173: 124: 3143: 2783:. Critics in 1912 were already including Duchamp in their surveys of Cubism: André Salmon in his 2163: 2117: 1934:
Duchamp is considered by many critics to be one of the most important artists of the 20th century
1740: 1701: 1277: 1131: 1018: 503: 2194:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2143: 1126:, among other prominent figures), thereby helping to shape the tastes of the Western art world. 921: 401: 3283:
Is it really significant that 'Ă©checs' (chess) is also French for 'failure'? I can't see why.
2210: 416:
Pablo Picasso lived the bigger part of his life in France, but he is still a Spanish artist...
2902: 2671: 2661:. His interest in Surrealism was in its relation to philosophy, sociology and literature (see 2566: 1946: 1725: 1310: 1193: 1061: 1055: 1036: 961: 914: 902: 864: 732: 679: 639: 579: 543: 527: 487: 447: 359: 309: 92: 2133: 1966: 1613:
Look in most cases I use and prefer the upright default; - mix a few up - and lets move on...
438:
Duchamp did become a naturalized American citizen, which merits the title "French-American".
372:
The hatnote on this article is very confusing to someone who is not familiar with the work ("
123:
offering everyday items as art. I'll try to find the reference and add it into the article. -
2925: 2809: 2805: 2792: 2591: 2570: 2526: 2509: 2485: 2472: 2077: 2028: 1973: 1777:
This is an article about Marcel Duchamp. The Afif piece should appear in the Afif article...
1744: 1705: 1690: 1265: 1170: 1123: 526:
Daughter - see Tompkins, Calvin (1996). Duchamp: A Biography. U.S.: Henry Holt and Company.
2423:
If somebody can give me a clear explanation of the events, that would be much appreciated!
2217: 2067: 362: 333: 276: 2999: 2753: 2730: 2717: 2698: 2685: 2123: 1859:
Susan Glover Godlewski. "Warm Ashes: The Life and Career of Mary Reynolds". </ref: -->
1814: 1763: 1632: 1604: 1500: 1469: 1437: 1409: 980: 834: 771: 756: 628: 258: 70: 2991: 2928:
for performing seemingly basic functions of Knowledge. It is unclear why this happened.
1759: 377: 2995: 2901:
Duchamp was a Surrealist, and therefore to tag the article with a Surrealism template.
2867: 2849: 2813: 2776: 2738: 2702: 2629: 2616: 2587: 2547: 2522: 2493: 2445: 2312: 2176:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2099: 2043: 2007: 1989: 1880: 1861: 1792: 1778: 1614: 1567: 1451: 1419: 1383: 330: 166: 2216:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
339:
However, as Knowledge is hosted in the US, it is US law we need to be concerned with.
2857: 2409: 2354: 1595: 1542: 1536: 1527: 1521: 1513: 1506: 1495: 1398: 1273: 1127: 1014: 842: 826: 502:* Kenetic art. Rotoreliefs-1920. Rotary demisphere-1925. He coined the term 'mobile' 340: 325: 298: 3337: 3318: 3298: 3272: 3250: 3219: 3197: 3110:"Behind The Scenes of the Legendary International Surrealist Exhibition | Widewalls" 3083: 3061: 2953: 2937: 2910: 2873: 2821: 2800: 2761: 2746: 2725: 2710: 2693: 2679: 2645: 2624: 2603: 2578: 2555: 2538: 2517: 2501: 2480: 2453: 2432: 2391: 2366: 2320: 2239: 2154:
http://www.centrepompidou.fr/education/ressources/ENS-Duchamp_en/ENS-duchamp_en.html
2085: 2051: 2036: 2015: 1997: 1981: 1917: 1867: 1847: 1822: 1800: 1786: 1771: 1748: 1733: 1709: 1694: 1675: 1636: 1622: 1608: 1575: 1473: 1459: 1441: 1427: 1413: 1391: 1351: 1314: 1281: 1197: 1135: 1069: 1040: 1022: 988: 969: 945: 924: 905: 837: 803: 774: 759: 736: 722: 704: 682: 663: 642: 582: 546: 490: 466: 450: 343: 301: 261: 208: 199: 186: 80: 3171: 3167: 1307: 1190: 1033: 897: 729: 674: 634: 574: 538: 482: 442: 354: 284: 147: 134: 116: 87: 1955:"the status he has lately assumed as the 20th century's most influential artist." 1173:
and other prominent figures, and helped shape the tastes of the Western art world.
1008:"advice to modern art collectors helped shape the tastes of the Western art world" 879:
Tompkins does not tell of any male lovers or hint of any action in that direction.
1051:
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9902E1DA1E3DF93AA25755C0A96E958260
2413: 2183: 1891:
Duchamp has had an immense impact on twentieth-century and twenty first-century
1686: 1261: 1116: 609: 601: 139: 77: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2405:
Can somebody clarify to me and others whether he was or was not a Surrealist?
2249: 1941:
These sources cited in the article attest to Duchamp being highly influential:
253:
Does anyone want to bring up the recent vandaism of 'Fountain' in the article?
3133: 3016: 2791:. I or another can add the references to the article once we reach concensus. 2182:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1628: 1600: 1465: 1447: 1433: 1405: 1257: 1112: 696: 3138:. [Mannheim :: Internationale Kunst- und Grosse Gartenbau-Ausstellung,. 1907. 2842:
In terms of bringing third parties to this discussion, you need to show what
3025: 2684:
Yes, he surely qualifies as a Cubist, by weight of 'Nude descending' alone.
1758:
Is there any good reason why an art reception by another known artist (here
656: 605: 2919:
References needed to clarify Exhibition design and installation art section
815: 1988:
I say so. Ultimately in simple terms he was the first conceptual artist...
1245: 1100: 441:
Yes. He became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 1955. It's in the article. (
785: 254: 3021: 1720: 930:
well known that their relationship was indeed emotional and physical.
3257:
Manzoni canned artist's shit in 1961. But really, out of place here.
1724:
artist. That's my two cents obviously. Hope nobdoy takes any offence.
770:
that, or can anyone find any images of it? I'd be most interested...--
2883: 1249: 1104: 312:
which is more similar to patent protection. In the case of Duchamp's
2887: 2416:" sentence in "Later Artistic Involvement", plus his involvement in 2006:
are conceptual works of art; essentially the first conceptual art...
1268:
and other prominent figures, thereby helping to shape the tastes of
374:
or the musical production alias derived from the rectified readymade
960:
would seem a sensible way to continue if this vandalism re-occurs.
566:
Politically, Duchamp ... identified with Individualist Anarchism...
3029: 2569:) that is wrong. The references are all on the side of inclusion. 816:
glbtq: encyclopedia of gay, lesbian, bisexual, & queer culture
692: 688: 652: 2886:
between 1911 and 1913 (during the crucial years) is reflected in
1464:
What I said wasn't a personal attack, but what you just said is.
3324:"a couple of dozen small cubes of marble resembling sugar cubes" 2897: 1418:
Not really - it is all practice and negotiation in real terms...
1253: 1108: 1860:
They were together until her death in 1950 of uterine cancer.--
1335:
http://www.lespressesdureel.com/EN/ouvrage.php?id=968&menu=
1260:
movements. Duchamp's output influenced the development of post-
1115:
movements. Duchamp's output influenced the development of post-
2164:
http://www.tate.org.uk/onlineevents/archive/duchamp_legacy.htm
25: 2402:
Just so I don't entangle myself and others in an edit war...
2144:
http://www.toutfait.com/online_journal_details.php?postid=866
195:, on the fact that the object is supposedly not functional. - 161:
and the joke that 'pubs don't sell beer, they just rent it'.)
2492:
did you mean Duchamp's art works relate to Cubism and Dada?
2248: 1965:"Arguably the most influential artist of the 20th century." 1930:
section we have the following statements, all well-sourced:
3014:
At the exhibition's entrance Breton placed Salvador DalĂ­'s
2508:
Thanks for pointing out the mistype, which I've corrected.
2273:
Knowledge article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
1856:
After Sarazin-Lavassor's death (June 23, 1988),<ref: -->
1813:
Ok, i think that's a passable alternative. Thank you! :) --
1511:" resizes the image to the specified width in pixels, and " 2134:
http://www.artscienceresearchlab.org/articles/panorama.htm
2110:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1006:
Just wondering -- is there a source saying that Duchamp's
376:"). Can it be reworded to contain less dadaist jargon? -- 3231:
There is bad words under collaberation with surrealists.
1082:
Thanks for that. Could we consider the following wording:
956:
This page is getting quite a few repeat IP vandal edits.
631:, believe Duchamp first encountered the work of Stirner. 350: 2124:
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/matisse.html
2063: 1264:
Western art. He advised modern art collectors, such as
76:
Someone please add/incorporate her into the article. -
1122:. He is known to have advised modern art collectors ( 1252:
artist whose work is most often associated with the
1107:
artist whose work is most often associated with the
2304:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 2186:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1911:"what ref are you talking about? take this to talk" 1791:
I added Fountain Archive to the See also section...
1853:indeed, so I move this here till it's corrected: 2655:) most well-known Cubist paintings is Duchamp's 349:Copyrights of Duchamp's work are managed by the 2982:Duchamp participated in the design of the 1938 1899:I reverted this addition with the edit summary 2245:Fair use rationale for File:Duchamp Sneeze.jpg 2172:This message was posted before February 2018. 624:The Bride Stripped Bare by Her Bachelors, Even 751:or A class, and maybe eventually make this a 8: 2490:Breton's art works relate to Cubism and Dada 888:Is the problem relevance? Wording? Evidence? 3104: 3102: 1762:) was removed, respectively is unwanted? -- 3284: 3258: 3205: 3183: 2377: 2294:Knowledge:Non-free use rationale guideline 1169:He advised modern art collectors, such as 272:representations/photographs of them are?-- 2098:I have just modified 4 external links on 562:Does anyone have a source for this info? 2984:Exposition Internationale du Surréalisme 2964:Exposition Internationale du Surréalisme 1248:) (28 July 1887 – 2 October 1968) was a 1103:) (28 July 1887 – 2 October 1968) was a 3098: 1358: 659:article. There's enough info there. -- 3328:Aren't there over a hundred of these? 3141: 2489: 1244: 1099: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3002:responsible for "water and foliage". 786:http://samuel-beckett.net/hugill.html 7: 1721:http://www.understandingduchamp.com/ 255:http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10736641 2990:, Paris. The show was organised by 1493:The thumbnail option may be used (" 2893:Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 2658:Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 2461:Concise Encyclopedia of Surrealism 604:and identified with Individualist 497:Significant things not covered yet 24: 3148:: CS1 maint: extra punctuation ( 2102:. Please take a moment to review 191:It is also based, in the case of 3038:And to change this for accuracy: 2615:and get other people's opinion? 2292:. Using one of the templates at 1887:into this sentence in the lead. 1627:Sure, fine. Yes, let's move on. 998:In the first paragraph it says: 994:Advice to modern art collectors? 29: 1450:and cut the personal attacks... 115:, it became a piece of art. -- 2306:Media copyright questions page 1546:" options to stand alone. The 687:Oh, even better. You changed 150:was defended on these grounds. 1: 3198:08:18, 12 December 2005 (UTC) 2911:07:14, 16 November 2019 (UTC) 2874:23:40, 15 November 2019 (UTC) 2822:17:07, 15 November 2019 (UTC) 2801:16:23, 15 November 2019 (UTC) 2762:16:43, 15 November 2019 (UTC) 2747:16:40, 15 November 2019 (UTC) 2735:Dialogues With Marcel Duchamp 2726:15:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC) 2711:13:56, 15 November 2019 (UTC) 2694:04:42, 15 November 2019 (UTC) 2680:04:39, 15 November 2019 (UTC) 2664:Dialogues With Marcel Duchamp 2646:23:24, 15 November 2019 (UTC) 2625:03:25, 15 November 2019 (UTC) 2604:01:14, 15 November 2019 (UTC) 2579:13:48, 14 November 2019 (UTC) 2556:13:53, 14 November 2019 (UTC) 2539:12:49, 14 November 2019 (UTC) 2518:19:28, 13 November 2019 (UTC) 2502:17:31, 13 November 2019 (UTC) 2481:16:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC) 2454:15:09, 13 November 2019 (UTC) 2433:08:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC) 2275:boilerplate fair use template 1968:(Museum of Fine Arts, Boston) 1848:04:14, 29 December 2015 (UTC) 1695:09:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 1676:21:56, 6 September 2011 (UTC) 1070:15:47, 27 November 2008 (UTC) 1041:06:44, 27 November 2008 (UTC) 1023:18:16, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 705:10:21, 29 November 2006 (UTC) 683:00:06, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 664:09:21, 27 November 2006 (UTC) 643:20:26, 9 September 2006 (UTC) 600:Politically, Duchamp opposed 583:02:51, 19 February 2006 (UTC) 547:18:34, 9 September 2006 (UTC) 491:18:34, 9 September 2006 (UTC) 2302:criteria for speedy deletion 2240:03:51, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 1734:20:05, 18 January 2009 (UTC) 1352:13:44, 16 January 2010 (UTC) 1315:02:53, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 1282:16:01, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 1198:05:25, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 1136:14:38, 2 December 2008 (UTC) 989:12:03, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 946:18:27, 13 January 2008 (UTC) 804:23:33, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 671:Readymades of Marcel Duchamp 434:) 05:12, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 393:Rene Clair film "Entr'acte'" 209:05:55, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 200:21:59, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 187:21:11, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 3338:00:28, 2 October 2023 (UTC) 3084:22:02, 22 August 2020 (UTC) 3062:15:50, 18 August 2020 (UTC) 2954:15:50, 18 August 2020 (UTC) 2938:15:05, 18 August 2020 (UTC) 2844:reliable, secondary sources 2785:Anecdotal History of Cubism 2392:21:40, 7 October 2019 (UTC) 2372:Comment on Joseph Nechvatal 1883:changed the lead to insert 1637:20:41, 19 August 2010 (UTC) 1623:20:40, 19 August 2010 (UTC) 1609:20:35, 19 August 2010 (UTC) 1576:20:32, 19 August 2010 (UTC) 1474:20:24, 19 August 2010 (UTC) 1460:20:23, 19 August 2010 (UTC) 1442:20:18, 19 August 2010 (UTC) 1428:20:13, 19 August 2010 (UTC) 1414:20:08, 19 August 2010 (UTC) 1392:19:57, 19 August 2010 (UTC) 925:20:20, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 262:07:02, 7 January 2006 (UTC) 130:That's interesting if true. 3353: 3319:05:23, 13 March 2023 (UTC) 3251:03:35, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 3220:00:24, 10 March 2006 (UTC) 2896:article. Passing over the 2781:Encyclopedia of Surrealism 2613:WT:WikiProject Visual arts 2408:I originally took him and 2321:11:22, 15 April 2018 (UTC) 2286:the image description page 2203:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2095:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2052:00:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC) 2037:22:52, 19 April 2017 (UTC) 2016:02:08, 18 April 2017 (UTC) 1998:02:03, 18 April 2017 (UTC) 1982:00:14, 18 April 2017 (UTC) 1905:Modernist then reinstated 1749:21:34, 2 August 2014 (UTC) 1710:21:31, 2 August 2014 (UTC) 970:22:32, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 737:14:16, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 723:03:52, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 467:15:45, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 451:01:10, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 98:21:01, July 15, 2005 (UTC) 3305:Duchamp as a chess player 3299:18:29, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 3273:01:33, 7 April 2006 (UTC) 3174:05:40, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC) 3045:Plus belles rues de Paris 3020:, a work consisting of a 2418:Dreams That Money Can Buy 2367:13:35, 25 July 2018 (UTC) 2288:and edit it to include a 2086:01:02, 26 June 2017 (UTC) 1823:06:17, 11 July 2015 (UTC) 1801:19:41, 10 July 2015 (UTC) 1787:19:39, 10 July 2015 (UTC) 1772:17:56, 10 July 2015 (UTC) 958:Knowledge:Semi-Protection 906:15:57, 4 March 2006 (UTC) 838:06:55, 4 March 2006 (UTC) 775:14:06, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 402:22:27, 21 July 2006 (UTC) 392: 388:16:43, 10 July 2006 (UTC) 169:09:32, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC) 127:23:32, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC) 81:20:33, 15 July 2005 (UTC) 2962:The article on the 1938 2267:explanation or rationale 2002:To be even more clear - 1681:How many official works? 829:04:31, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC) 780:Lasker-Reichelm Position 760:13:05, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 363:17:45, 22 May 2006 (UTC) 344:14:43, 22 May 2006 (UTC) 334:14:15, 22 May 2006 (UTC) 302:12:00, 22 May 2006 (UTC) 277:07:57, 22 May 2006 (UTC) 267:images of duchamp's work 176:09:53, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2924:been reverted twice by 2258:File:Duchamp Sneeze.jpg 2091:External links modified 1868:20:51, 6 May 2016 (UTC) 1049:Another reference here 691:(all caps). I changed 612:'s philosophical tract 523:Non-wife relationships. 2988:Galerie des Beaux-arts 2888:his work of the period 2290:non-free use rationale 2253: 1909:with the edit summary 1715:Rewrite needed, maybe? 1306:Works for me. Thanks! 351:Artists Rights Society 2269:as to why its use in 2252: 1503:. An option such as " 608:, in particular with 422:comment was added by 42:of past discussions. 2351:baroness's wiki page 2184:regular verification 1367:Duchamp: A Biography 1272:during this period. 1030:Duchamp: A Biography 975:Duchamp Chess Riddle 814:Duchamp is not gay. 669:It now redirects to 266: 2882:That Duchamp was a 2632:, it is done; it's 2174:After February 2018 1659:Dada and Surrealism 615:The Ego and Its Own 18:Talk:Marcel Duchamp 3028:covered with live 2488:, where you wrote 2254: 2228:InternetArchiveBot 2179:InternetArchiveBot 1404:a policy. Cheers. 504:Mobile (sculpture) 408:French-American??? 3301: 3289:comment added by 3275: 3263:comment added by 3237:comment added by 3222: 3210:comment added by 3200: 3188:comment added by 2865: 2394: 2382:comment added by 2204: 1342:comment added by 1312: 1195: 1038: 948: 936:comment added by 806: 794:comment added by 734: 702:ScarletSpiderDave 661:ScarletSpiderDave 481:It's now edited. 457:Photo of Fountain 435: 310:Registered Design 133:Nevertheless, as 95: 67: 66: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3344: 3253: 3154: 3153: 3147: 3139: 3130: 3124: 3123: 3121: 3120: 3114:www.widewalls.ch 3106: 3076:Hesperian Nguyen 3054:Hesperian Nguyen 2946:Hesperian Nguyen 2930:Hesperian Nguyen 2926:User:Sweetpool50 2872: 2870: 2863: 2862: 2856: 2847: 2265:but there is no 2238: 2229: 2202: 2201: 2180: 2121: 1894: 1596:image use policy 1565: 1559: 1555: 1549: 1545: 1539: 1533: 1525: 1517: 1510: 1498: 1399:image use policy 1370: 1363: 1354: 1311: 1266:Peggy Guggenheim 1247: 1243: 1240:Marcel Duchamp ( 1194: 1171:Peggy Guggenheim 1124:Peggy Guggenheim 1102: 1098: 1095:Marcel Duchamp ( 1066: 1064: 1058: 1037: 931: 789: 753:featured article 733: 597:Political views 417: 93: 86:Done. Thanks! -- 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3352: 3351: 3347: 3346: 3345: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3326: 3307: 3281: 3232: 3229: 3180: 3164: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3140: 3132: 3131: 3127: 3118: 3116: 3108: 3107: 3100: 3000:Wolfgang Paalen 2921: 2868: 2866: 2860: 2854: 2853: 2733:, In Cabanne's 2638:Orlando the Cat 2609:Orlando the Cat 2596:Orlando the Cat 2544:Orlando the Cat 2531:Orlando the Cat 2439:Orlando the Cat 2425:Orlando the Cat 2400: 2374: 2328: 2247: 2232: 2227: 2195: 2188:have permission 2178: 2115: 2108:this simple FaQ 2093: 2060: 1892: 1878: 1857:].</ref: --> 1835: 1756: 1717: 1683: 1661: 1563: 1557: 1553: 1547: 1541: 1535: 1531: 1519: 1512: 1504: 1494: 1379: 1374: 1373: 1364: 1360: 1337: 1241: 1096: 1062: 1056: 1053: 996: 977: 954: 812: 782: 767: 745: 715: 650: 629:Francis Naumann 560: 519:Box in a valise 499: 474: 472:Société Anonyme 459: 418:—The preceding 410: 395: 385: 370: 269: 251: 105: 74: 71:Alexina Duchamp 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3350: 3348: 3325: 3322: 3311:158.174.226.96 3306: 3303: 3280: 3277: 3228: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3179: 3178:Maria Martins? 3176: 3163: 3160: 3156: 3155: 3125: 3097: 3096: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3012: 3011: 3010: 3009: 2986:, held at the 2980: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2957: 2956: 2920: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2877: 2876: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2648: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2442: 2399: 2396: 2384:95.172.233.247 2373: 2370: 2327: 2324: 2246: 2243: 2222: 2221: 2214: 2167: 2166: 2158:Added archive 2156: 2148:Added archive 2146: 2138:Added archive 2136: 2128:Added archive 2126: 2100:Marcel Duchamp 2092: 2089: 2059: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2004:the readymades 1970: 1969: 1963: 1958: 1953: 1939: 1938: 1935: 1897: 1896: 1881:User:Modernist 1877: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1834: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1755: 1752: 1716: 1713: 1682: 1679: 1668:Lexxicanradio1 1660: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1579: 1578: 1528:plain pictures 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1378: 1375: 1372: 1371: 1357: 1356: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219:is acceptable: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1044: 1043: 1028:Yes. Tomkins: 995: 992: 976: 973: 953: 950: 911: 910: 909: 908: 892: 891: 890: 889: 883: 882: 881: 880: 874: 873: 872: 871: 857: 856: 855: 854: 848: 847: 824: 823: 811: 808: 796:129.74.108.200 781: 778: 766: 763: 744: 741: 740: 739: 714: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 649: 646: 595: 594: 590: 589: 559: 556: 552: 535: 534: 524: 521: 512: 498: 495: 494: 493: 473: 470: 464:DavidShankBone 458: 455: 409: 406: 394: 391: 381: 369: 366: 347: 346: 305: 304: 296: 295: 294: 274:81.215.215.108 268: 265: 250: 247: 246: 245: 244: 243: 242: 241: 240: 239: 238: 237: 236: 235: 218: 217: 216: 215: 214: 213: 212: 211: 179: 178: 177: 162: 151: 131: 104: 101: 100: 99: 73: 68: 65: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3349: 3340: 3339: 3335: 3331: 3323: 3321: 3320: 3316: 3312: 3304: 3302: 3300: 3296: 3292: 3288: 3278: 3276: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3262: 3254: 3252: 3248: 3244: 3240: 3236: 3226: 3221: 3217: 3213: 3209: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3199: 3195: 3191: 3190:66.215.211.81 3187: 3177: 3175: 3173: 3169: 3161: 3151: 3145: 3137: 3136: 3129: 3126: 3115: 3111: 3105: 3103: 3099: 3095: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3063: 3059: 3055: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3046: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3031: 3027: 3023: 3019: 3018: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2965: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2918: 2912: 2908: 2904: 2899: 2895: 2894: 2889: 2885: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2875: 2871: 2859: 2851: 2845: 2841: 2840: 2823: 2819: 2815: 2811: 2807: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2786: 2782: 2778: 2775: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2744: 2740: 2736: 2732: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2666: 2665: 2660: 2659: 2654: 2649: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2631: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2563: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2478: 2474: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2440: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2421: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2410:Arthur Cravan 2406: 2403: 2397: 2395: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2371: 2369: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2356: 2355:Louise Norton 2352: 2348: 2344: 2339: 2336: 2333: 2325: 2323: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2309: 2308:. Thank you. 2307: 2303: 2297: 2295: 2291: 2287: 2284:Please go to 2282: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2259: 2251: 2244: 2242: 2241: 2236: 2231: 2230: 2219: 2215: 2212: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2199: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2175: 2170: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2125: 2119: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2096: 2090: 2088: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2074: 2072: 2069: 2065: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2027: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1967: 1964: 1962: 1959: 1957: 1954: 1951: 1948: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1936: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1929: 1924: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1912: 1908: 1903: 1902: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1886: 1882: 1876:Impact on art 1875: 1869: 1866: 1863: 1855: 1854: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1833:Personal Life 1832: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1753: 1751: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1736: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1722: 1714: 1712: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1697: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1680: 1678: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1658: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1597: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1562: 1552: 1544: 1538: 1529: 1523: 1515: 1508: 1502: 1497: 1492: 1491: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1400: 1397:Yes, but the 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1376: 1368: 1362: 1359: 1355: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1336: 1332: 1316: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1246: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1199: 1196: 1192: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1172: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1101: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1071: 1068: 1065: 1060: 1059: 1052: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1042: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1011: 1009: 1004: 1003: 999: 993: 991: 990: 986: 982: 974: 972: 971: 967: 963: 959: 951: 949: 947: 943: 939: 938:69.179.78.140 935: 927: 926: 923: 919: 918:0-262-08225-X 916: 907: 904: 901: 896: 895: 894: 893: 887: 886: 885: 884: 878: 877: 876: 875: 869: 868:0-8050-5789-7 866: 861: 860: 859: 858: 852: 851: 850: 849: 844: 843:Pablo Picasso 839: 836: 832: 831: 830: 828: 821: 820: 819: 817: 809: 807: 805: 801: 797: 793: 787: 779: 777: 776: 773: 764: 762: 761: 758: 754: 750: 742: 738: 735: 731: 727: 726: 725: 724: 721: 712: 706: 703: 698: 694: 690: 686: 685: 684: 681: 678: 672: 668: 667: 666: 665: 662: 658: 654: 647: 645: 644: 641: 638: 632: 630: 626: 625: 619: 617: 616: 611: 607: 603: 598: 592: 591: 588:I removed it. 587: 586: 585: 584: 581: 578: 571: 568: 567: 563: 557: 555: 550: 548: 545: 542: 532: 531:0-8050-5789-7 529: 525: 522: 520: 516: 513: 510: 509: 508: 507: 505: 496: 492: 489: 486: 480: 479: 478: 471: 469: 468: 465: 456: 454: 452: 449: 446: 439: 436: 433: 429: 425: 424:82.234.240.81 421: 414: 407: 405: 403: 400: 399:64.126.92.172 390: 389: 386: 384: 379: 375: 367: 365: 364: 361: 358: 352: 345: 342: 338: 337: 336: 335: 332: 327: 322: 319: 315: 311: 303: 300: 297: 293: 289: 288: 286: 281: 280: 279: 278: 275: 264: 263: 260: 256: 248: 232: 231: 228: 227: 226: 225: 224: 223: 222: 221: 220: 219: 210: 207: 203: 202: 201: 198: 194: 190: 189: 188: 185: 180: 175: 171: 170: 168: 163: 160: 156: 152: 149: 145: 141: 136: 132: 129: 128: 126: 121: 120: 119: 118: 114: 110: 102: 97: 91: 85: 84: 83: 82: 79: 72: 69: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3327: 3308: 3291:68.6.123.206 3285:— Preceding 3282: 3265:24.136.1.126 3259:— Preceding 3255: 3233:— Preceding 3230: 3212:71.57.128.90 3206:— Preceding 3184:— Preceding 3181: 3165: 3134: 3128: 3117:. Retrieved 3113: 3093: 3044: 3043: 3015: 3013: 2992:André Breton 2987: 2981: 2922: 2903:Coldcreation 2891: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2734: 2672:Coldcreation 2662: 2656: 2652: 2567:Coldcreation 2468: 2464: 2460: 2422: 2407: 2404: 2401: 2378:— Preceding 2375: 2340: 2337: 2331: 2329: 2310: 2298: 2283: 2270: 2256: 2255: 2226: 2223: 2198:source check 2177: 2171: 2168: 2097: 2094: 2068:cited source 2061: 2025: 2022: 2003: 1971: 1940: 1927: 1925: 1920: 1915: 1910: 1906: 1904: 1900: 1898: 1884: 1879: 1836: 1760:Saâdane Afif 1757: 1737: 1718: 1698: 1684: 1666: 1662: 1524:|upright=1.2 1478:To be clear: 1401: 1380: 1366: 1361: 1344:84.97.231.20 1333: 1329: 1054: 1029: 1012: 1007: 1005: 1001: 1000: 997: 978: 962:ChessCreator 955: 928: 912: 903:TALK<< 825: 813: 783: 768: 749:Good Article 746: 743:Nice article 720:Ibickerstaff 716: 700:thought) -- 680:TALK<< 651: 640:TALK<< 633: 622: 620: 613: 599: 596: 580:TALK<< 572: 569: 565: 564: 561: 551: 544:TALK<< 536: 518: 514: 501: 500: 488:TALK<< 475: 460: 448:TALK<< 440: 437: 415: 411: 396: 380: 373: 371: 360:TALK<< 348: 323: 317: 313: 306: 290: 285:Damien Hirst 270: 252: 192: 172:Well said. - 158: 154: 148:Turner Prize 146:in the 1999 143: 135:User:Tarquin 117:user:Tarquin 112: 108: 106: 75: 60: 43: 37: 3227:Surrealists 2996:Paul Éluard 2810:Sweetpool50 2806:Sweetpool50 2793:Sweetpool50 2668:(this page) 2592:Sweetpool50 2571:Sweetpool50 2527:Sweetpool50 2510:Sweetpool50 2486:Sweetpool50 2473:Sweetpool50 2414:Surrealists 2398:Surrealist? 2345:, and this 2078:Verbcatcher 2029:Verbcatcher 1974:Verbcatcher 1532:upright=1.8 1501:preferences 1338:—Preceding 1270:Western art 1262:World War I 1120:Western art 1117:World War I 932:—Preceding 790:—Preceding 728:Go for it. 610:Max Stirner 602:World War I 140:Tracey Emin 36:This is an 3239:24.1.8.173 3119:2020-08-18 3094:References 3074:Ok, done. 3017:Rainy Taxi 2754:Randy Kryn 2731:Randy Kryn 2718:Randy Kryn 2699:Randy Kryn 2686:Randy Kryn 2235:Report bug 2058:Citzenship 1950:0805057897 1907:conceptual 1893:conceptual 1885:conceptual 1815:Sister Ray 1764:Sister Ray 1561:Tall image 1551:Wide image 1448:MOS:IMAGES 1446:Read this 1258:Surrealist 1113:Surrealist 981:Cammacleay 835:Dpayne1912 772:Jaybzjaybz 765:Enneagram? 757:Carcharoth 697:l.h.o.o.q. 648:L.H.O.O.Q. 558:Anarchist? 259:JohnDBuell 249:Vandalism? 3144:cite book 3026:mannequin 2852:, please 2814:Vexations 2777:Vexations 2739:Vexations 2703:Vexations 2630:Vexations 2617:Vexations 2588:Vexations 2548:Vexations 2523:Vexations 2494:Vexations 2465:Minotaure 2446:Vexations 2313:Marchjuly 2218:this tool 2211:this tool 2118:dead link 2064:this edit 2044:Modernist 2008:Modernist 1990:Modernist 1919:and says 1793:Modernist 1779:Modernist 1754:Reception 1615:Modernist 1568:Modernist 1522:frameless 1452:Modernist 1420:Modernist 1384:Modernist 1382:varied... 1365:Tomkins: 1308:--sparkit 1191:--sparkit 1034:--sparkit 952:IP edits. 730:--sparkit 657:Mona Lisa 606:Anarchism 515:Green box 404:Gabriela 331:Solipsist 167:Solipsist 113:displayed 61:Archive 1 3287:unsigned 3261:unsigned 3247:contribs 3235:unsigned 3208:unsigned 3186:unsigned 2967:Duchamp. 2850:watching 2380:unsigned 2359:Trishcan 2326:Fountain 2279:fair use 2263:fair use 2224:Cheers.— 1726:L-Enormi 1377:WP:VAMOS 1340:unsigned 1274:Bus stop 1128:Bus stop 1015:Bus stop 934:unsigned 900:sparkit| 827:Hyacinth 792:unsigned 677:sparkit| 637:sparkit| 577:sparkit| 573:Thanks. 541:sparkit| 485:sparkit| 445:sparkit| 432:contribs 420:unsigned 378:nae'blis 357:sparkit| 341:Tyrenius 326:Tyrenius 324:Also as 318:Fountain 314:Fountain 299:Tyrenius 193:Fountain 159:Fountain 155:Fountain 96:<< 90:sparkit| 3330:Викидим 3172:sparkit 3168:sparkit 3022:taxicab 2898:Dadaist 2347:article 2343:article 2122:tag to 2104:my edit 2042:Done... 1926:In the 1840:Noplotr 1700:issues. 1518:" (or " 1514:upright 1254:Dadaist 1109:Dadaist 368:hatnote 206:Sigma-6 197:Willmcw 184:Sigma-6 174:Willmcw 125:Willmcw 39:archive 3279:French 3030:snails 2884:Cubist 2789:Cubism 2114:Added 1928:Legacy 1862:tickle 1741:DILNN1 1702:DILNN1 1687:LAgurl 1540:" or " 1537:center 1526:" for 1250:French 1105:French 1063:george 1057:Teapot 713:Legacy 593:Was... 383:(talk) 144:My Bed 109:signed 103:Urinal 78:Feydey 2848:(not 1629:Yworo 1601:Yworo 1496:thumb 1466:Yworo 1434:Yworo 1406:Yworo 922:Certa 899:: --> 898:: --> 846:done. 693:lhooq 689:LHOOQ 676:: --> 675:: --> 653:lhooq 636:: --> 635:: --> 576:: --> 575:: --> 540:: --> 539:: --> 511:Films 484:: --> 483:: --> 444:: --> 443:: --> 356:: --> 355:: --> 89:: --> 88:: --> 16:< 3334:talk 3315:talk 3295:talk 3269:talk 3243:talk 3216:talk 3194:talk 3162:oops 3150:link 3080:talk 3058:talk 2994:and 2950:talk 2934:talk 2907:talk 2869:czar 2858:ping 2818:talk 2797:talk 2758:talk 2743:talk 2722:talk 2707:talk 2690:talk 2676:talk 2642:talk 2634:here 2621:talk 2600:talk 2575:talk 2552:talk 2535:talk 2514:talk 2498:talk 2477:talk 2467:and 2450:talk 2429:talk 2388:talk 2363:talk 2332:Mott 2317:talk 2271:this 2082:talk 2048:talk 2033:talk 2012:talk 1994:talk 1978:talk 1947:ISBN 1895:art. 1844:talk 1819:talk 1797:talk 1783:talk 1768:talk 1745:talk 1730:talk 1706:talk 1691:talk 1672:talk 1633:talk 1619:talk 1605:talk 1572:talk 1556:and 1543:none 1516:=1.2 1505:|300 1470:talk 1456:talk 1438:talk 1424:talk 1410:talk 1388:talk 1348:talk 1278:talk 1256:and 1242:IPA: 1132:talk 1111:and 1097:IPA: 1019:talk 985:talk 966:talk 942:talk 915:ISBN 865:ISBN 810:Gay? 800:talk 695:and 673:. -- 528:ISBN 517:and 428:talk 111:and 94:TALK 2670:). 2653:the 2469:VVV 2311:-- 2192:RfC 2162:to 2152:to 2142:to 2132:to 2062:In 1010:? 833:-- 142:'s 3336:) 3317:) 3297:) 3271:) 3249:) 3245:• 3218:) 3196:) 3146:}} 3142:{{ 3112:. 3101:^ 3082:) 3060:) 2952:) 2936:) 2909:) 2861:}} 2855:{{ 2820:) 2808:, 2799:) 2760:) 2745:) 2724:) 2709:) 2692:) 2678:) 2644:) 2623:) 2602:) 2590:, 2577:) 2554:) 2537:) 2525:, 2516:) 2500:) 2479:) 2452:) 2431:) 2390:) 2365:) 2319:) 2281:. 2205:. 2200:}} 2196:{{ 2120:}} 2116:{{ 2084:) 2050:) 2035:) 2014:) 1996:) 1980:) 1913:. 1865:me 1846:) 1821:) 1799:) 1785:) 1770:) 1747:) 1732:) 1708:) 1693:) 1674:) 1635:) 1621:) 1607:) 1574:) 1564:}} 1558:{{ 1554:}} 1548:{{ 1507:px 1472:) 1458:) 1440:) 1426:) 1412:) 1402:is 1390:) 1350:) 1280:) 1134:) 1021:) 987:) 968:) 944:) 870:.) 818:: 802:) 755:. 549:) 462:-- 453:) 430:• 353:. 287:: 257:-- 3332:( 3313:( 3293:( 3267:( 3241:( 3214:( 3192:( 3152:) 3122:. 3078:( 3056:( 2948:( 2932:( 2905:( 2864:) 2816:( 2795:( 2756:( 2741:( 2720:( 2705:( 2688:( 2674:( 2640:( 2619:( 2598:( 2573:( 2550:( 2533:( 2512:( 2496:( 2475:( 2448:( 2427:( 2386:( 2361:( 2315:( 2237:) 2233:( 2220:. 2213:. 2080:( 2046:( 2031:( 2010:( 1992:( 1976:( 1952:) 1842:( 1817:( 1795:( 1781:( 1766:( 1743:( 1728:( 1704:( 1689:( 1670:( 1631:( 1617:( 1603:( 1570:( 1520:| 1509:| 1468:( 1454:( 1436:( 1422:( 1408:( 1386:( 1369:. 1346:( 1276:( 1130:( 1017:( 983:( 964:( 940:( 798:( 537:( 533:. 506:. 426:( 50:.

Index

Talk:Marcel Duchamp
archive
current talk page
Archive 1
Alexina Duchamp
Feydey
20:33, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
>>sparkit|
TALK<<
user:Tarquin
Willmcw
User:Tarquin
Tracey Emin
Turner Prize
Solipsist
Willmcw
Sigma-6
21:11, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Willmcw
21:59, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Sigma-6
05:55, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10736641
JohnDBuell
07:02, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
81.215.215.108
07:57, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Damien Hirst
Tyrenius
12:00, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑