Talk:Mendelian inheritance - Knowledge (XXG)

1907:

that the common principles Mendel observed have certain exeptions. Neither Mendel nor today's genetic experts speak of laws. Laws are made by politicians, in the best case by lawyers. They must be obeyed by the citizens. Tell a cat that when it gets kittens it has to follow a law about what its kittens have to look like. No. The natural processes of gamet formation (meiosis) in zygotes and embryos are much more complex. This article Mendelian inheritance is in a bad condition. Hundrets of thousands of students in America, Britain and Australia read this and then get bad grades because they trusted Knowledge (XXG). It is our responsibility to ensure that they can trust Knowledge (XXG). At the moment, many teachers in schools discourage or even forbid students from using Knowledge (XXG). This will not change as long as people who are not studied professionals make decisions here. In the discussion above in the contributions of studied biologists the shortcomings were clearly formulated. They made meaningful proposals. My edits corresponded to that.

1742:. At the time, Mendel's conclusions were regarded as laws, since they were repeatedly confirmed in his experimental objects. These were mainly pea plants. However, other experimental objects were missing, such as breeding experiments with many other plant species and animals. Chromosomes had not yet been discovered at that time and nothing was known about linked genes on the same chromosome, crossing over, spontaneous mutations and maternal inheritance through mitochondrial DNA. It would be misleading to speak of laws today. This would give the impression that the basic principles discovered by Mendel were wrong. They are correct, but there are too many exceptions to speak of laws 1056:

common problem in science articles. I have seen articles on craters of the moon which do not tell you where the crater is to be found through a telescope, and I have often seen articles on animals that include detailed taxonomies but neglect to mention in what parts of the earth the particular animal in question is to be taxonomized. The root problem here I fear is a certain vanity inherent in swottiness - authors are more concerned with looking clever in front of experts than offering their knowledge to the wider public. They care more about displaying their knowledge to those who already know the material than giving it to those who do not.

1461: 2249: 1468: 1447: 2281:-Generation can occur in dominant-recessive inheritances as well as in intermediate inheritances, that homozygous individuals show a trait from a homozygous grand parent. It is important to show that in the inheritance schemes. Otherwise the observer could mistakenly assume that the original colours of the plants of the P-generation would get lost forever with intermediate inheritance and everything would end in a mishmash. This would contradict the finding that these diploid organisms each inherit one of two alleles that meet in the 2258: 1475: 1547:

capitol P and a small p stand for purple (dominant) and non-purple (recessive). Now we ended up with blue. What a confusion for the poor students, who are supposed to learn and understand this in context with the other graphic using the letters R and w for red and white, which is correct, but with wrong numbering. The P-generation is not Nr. 1. The F1-generation is not Nr. 2. Yes, both pictures are pretty SVGs but they both only contribute to the never ending confusion. Therefore I made the new technically correct graphics.

319: 298: 1454: 91: 64: 31: 214: 1533: 473:

produced offspring that were entirely yellow-seeded. However, when these yellow-seeded offspring were crossed with the original green-seeded parent strain (a procedure known as back-crossing), half of the plants in the second offspring generation bore yellow seeds and half bore green seeds. The following diagram illustrates these crossesdominant yellow characteristic and a lower-case y to indicate the recessive green characteristic. These two variants are called

1579: 1839:

BIOLOGIE from Campbell and Reece the uniformity of the individuals in the F1-Generation is called the first Mendelian principle on page 295. Without such a F1-Generation a cross of two verifiable heterozygous individuals with a dominant trait wouldn't be possible, so the conclusion that all individuals in the F1-Generation have the same genotype and same phenotyp is the basis for the other conclusions. If no one answers, I'll take that as tacit approval.

1086:

or identifying parents as specifically male or female) which could be done away with. And in some places, this article seems to be more from simple english than regular english, and appears directed at small children. I think it would serve this article well the be completely rewritten by someone extraordinarily knowledgeable about Mendel (with some of the better parts salvaged), instead of some 14 year old kid who heard of him in his biology class.

204: 183: 151: 1540: 2709: 2303:, the left panel shows heterozygous F1s. The right panel then shows homozygous F1s that mysteriously have the parental genotype but the intermediate phenotype. If one follows the arrows in the right panel, one would get four heterozygotes (like in the left panel). I assumed it was a mistake; but perhaps there's a finer point I'm continuing to miss. To state my question clearly (I hope): in the 2034:). This leads to different phenotypes. But a pea plant with red flowers won't dominate the plant with white flowers. In the human world it seems to be different, but this belongs to the field of social behaviour. Phenotype is not a term for an individual, but for the expression of the physical characteristics that are genetically determined. Thus phenotypes have no interaction. 22: 2225:, is the right panel (F1-Generation) intended to begin with heterozygous genotypes? Or am I misunderstanding something? It doesn't seem to make sense as it is now. Thanks for all your work! Sorry for the mostly silence in response to your earlier questions. The biology-interested editors are spread fairly thin on the English Knowledge (XXG). Thanks 2269:

incomplete dominance. The heterozygous offspring with light pink flowers are all fertile. Of course, crosses can occur between them and these crosses have also been experimentally studied. It was shown that the crossing of two heterozygous individuals results in a phenotype ratio of 1 : 2 : 1. This can be explained by the fact that in the F

2164:

them, so that they are not interested in dealing with such trivial things. The importance of the article for college students does not seem to them to be a reason. If I don't get any feedback by next week, I'll assume tacit agreement. I have sufficiently justified my proposals for changes and have completed the article

2273:-Generation homozygous are formed again. 50 % heterozygous with the middle color (intermediate), 25 % homozygous for dark pink and 25 % homozygous for white. The genetic test series did not stop after the first generation, otherwise the scientists would not have done justice to the matter. The flower colours of 1804:(and please observe the spelling of the word "molecular"). This shows that a number of related WikiProjects - including WikiProject Genetics - were merged earlier this year. This does not remove the article Mendelian inheritance from their purview, and so they have a right to know what you propose. -- 1085:

Someone edited this and put some immature rude stuff in, which amused me because what loser could possibly have a beef with dear old Gregor Mendel? But anyways, this article has some animal-centric language (such as characterizing gametes as specifically egg and sperm, which they are not necessarily,

777:

After thinking about this and looking at various sources, I think the best way to proceed is to talk about Mendel's Five Principles, and correlate them with "Mendel's Laws" in all their messy glory. Are there really no comments? That's hard to believe after all the "discussion" on the various other

625:

I was also taught to write it that way; it is generally easier to use upper and lower case letters just because it is easier to see which is dominant and recessive. However, it can also be written w/ different letters, as in used in the image. This becomes important after dealing with traits that can

497:

Mendel's Second Law: During the formation of sperm and egg, the segregation of alleles for one gene is independent of the segregation of alleles for another gene. This law was slightly more complex to demonstrate, requiring the statistical analysis of offspring of plants that differed in two separate

2463:

1. "There are many violations of independent assortment due to genetic linkage." The statement sounds right, if you beleive the principles were laws. A law can be violated by a person, who doesn't follow that law. If we generally use the word principles, the sentence can be formulated correctly as a

2102:

I already told you, twice. But to explain again: there are WikiPtoject banner templates at the top of this page. Each one has a phrase "join the discussion". That phrase has a link that takes you to the talk page for the WikiProject concerned. These are where you should send notices. If you want to,

1270:

To many terms used in this article are merging ideas from the sinthethic theory of inheritance or cromosomical theory of inheritance. I think that Mendel never uses terms as genetics, homozigosis or F1/F2... So Mendel never ... "summarized his findings in two laws; the Law of Segregation and the Law

1055:

PROBLEM WITH ARTICLE: The history section alludes to many details of Mendel's theory/theories that have not been explained up to that point. Could someone please make this article accessible to the lay reader, who is, after all, the reader to whom this article is supposed to be addressed? This is a

2499:

5. "As such, the zygote can end up with any combination of paternal or maternal chromosomes. Any of the possible variants of a zygote formed from maternal and paternal chromosomes will occur with equal frequency. For human gametes, with 23 pairs of chromosomes, the number of possibilities is 223 or

2479:

3. "During gametogenesis — the production of new gametes by an adult — the normal complement of 46 chromosomes needs to be halved to 23 to ensure that the resulting haploid gamete can join with another gamete to produce a diploid organism. An error in the number of chromosomes, such as those caused

2467:

2. "Of the 46 chromosomes in a normal diploid human cell, half are maternally derived (from the mother's egg) and half are paternally derived (from the father's sperm). This occurs as sexual reproduction involves the fusion of two haploid gametes (the egg and sperm) to produce a new organism having

2163:

Still no answer from anyone. It is possible that the molecular geneticists here in the Knowledge (XXG) project do not consider Mendelian inheritance so important in view of the great progress made in the field of molecular genetics, because such knowledge is part of the simplest basic knowledge for

1906:

Your reasoning doing the revert that these would be laws shows that you have no idea what this is about. Gregor Mendel has statistically proven regularities in inheritance in his pea plants. The people who interpreted his results then spoke of laws. In the meantime, genetic research has established

1035:

of math which biologists weren't used to). The opening paragraph of this article says that when his work was rediscovered it was controversial, but then finally accepted. The History section is a little unclear as to whether his work was accepted or controversial--it probably needs to be clarified.

873:

I'm starting to feel ambivalent about this, realizing that "independent assortment" exists in contrast to "genetic linkage". The article includes descriptions of the molecular basis of independent assortment that should not be placed within the mendelian genetics article -- since mendelian genetics

700:

The first problem is the organization of the material. It seems to list Three "Laws." I quickly used "Mendel's Second Law" in a google search and came up with several different answers. Unfortunately, this means that the numbering for Mendel's Laws are quite suspect. However we want to organize

466:

Mendel's First Law: Each adult pea plant has two genes - a gene pair - for each characteristic. The two members of each gene pair separate (segregate) randomly into the eggs or sperm of the plant, so that each egg or sperm contains only one member of each gene pair. The offspring therefore inherits

2764:

Hello, my name is Luke Insana, and I have come to improve the sources linked in the history portion of the article. I also added an inheritance tools section to this article discussing pedigrees and Punnett squares, so that in case a reader had no idea what they were or how to use them, they could

2487:

4. "In independent assortment, the chromosomes that result are randomly sorted from all possible maternal and paternal chromosomes. Because zygotes end up with a random mix instead of a pre-defined "set" from either parent, chromosomes are therefore considered assorted independently." Here the way

1785:

is about MOLEKULAR biology and MOLEKULAR genetics. At the time of Gregor Mendel nobody knew that molecules that are relevant for inheritance exist. The molecular biologists are not responsible for the article Mendelian inheritance. Mendelian inheritance is part of the classical genetics. What does

1546:

What does the B b mean in the graphic on the left? Dominant alleles are symbolized by an upper case letter, recessive alleles by a lower case letter. But why B? Is that supposed to mean blue? Mendel used purple-red and white blooming plants. In the book Campbell Biology, German edition page 298, a

1838:

Can you please have a look at my suggestions in sections 24 to 26 and at my edits, which were reversed by Redrose64. Would you agree to the article being reset to the corrected version I made? Then we can make a few more edits. I would also prefer the term Mendelian principles. In the German book

472:

The first law of Mendelian Genetics was easily illustrated due to the phenomenon of dominance. Certain characteristics, such as yellow seeds, were found to be "dominant" over other "recessive" characteristics, in this case over green seeds. A yellow-seeded plant crossed with a green-seeded plant

2483:

Production of new gamets "by an adult" only applies for men. In humans the development of the egg cells, the meiosis, takes place during early childhood. Every species has its own certain number of chromosomes. Meiosis takes place on both sides during the production of gametes, to avoid that two

1385:

determining if there would be different results with better breeding at the time of this experiment incest was legal but for about three generations now incest has been outlawed in the US and I have seen evidence in my family tree that would contradict Mendelian laws now that incest is outlawed.

2574:

I wouldn't be surprised if Campbell or Reece had read the wrong order of Mendel's rules here. This is a common phenomenon today that people use Knowledge (XXG) as a source and reproduce content without crediting. Then, in the worst case, we find our own mistakes in the newer literature sources.

2014:

In the sections we must make a clear distinction between the methodological path Mendel followed in his discoveries and the principles he discovered. If he has not worked with Mirabilis jalapa, but this plant can serve as an example of the principle of segregation, which applies in intermediate

604:

I was taught that the symbols for a recessive and a dominant trait are always the same letter, except one is capitol and one is lower case. I.e. a red flower would be symbolised as 'R', while the white flower it was being breeded with would be 'r'. Here, they are each being represented by thier

528:

When I came across this article, I found it rather counter-intuitive, in that Mendel's second law comes before the law of segregation, which I believe is his first. Is there a reason I'm missing for this order? The one I can think of is that the law of independent assortment (the second law) is

2536:

into the appropriate article. I already started to complete it. Examples of Non-Mendelian inheritance don't mean, Mendel generally went wrong. After his discoveries more and more new discoveries about genetics were made. He himself has said that the regularities he discovered apply only to the

2126:

I have been working in the German Knowledge (XXG) for many years correcting biologiy articles and writing some new ones. I don't know the administration system of the english Knowledge (XXG). If you manage this article Mendelian inheritance and know the system, could you please do that for me?

2268:

The left panel shows the first cross of two homozygous individuals. The result are heterozygous individuals that cannot produce enough of the pigment, because they have only one allele on which the enzymes for the production of this pigment are coded. In this case that isn't enough. Therefore

1112:

We have two parent types (of a different species), and the resulting cross is an intermediate for the most part in phenotypes. In terms of Mendelian Genetics, even after many generations, are both parent types manifest in the hybrid population? In other words, will a few rare individuals that

1680:

The scientific community has agreed to no longer call Mendel's rules "laws" because there are many exceptions that can be explained by the chromosomal theory of inheritance. Mendel's rules are also referred to as rules or principles in English literature. The term laws is wrong and outdated.

1384:

This article is missing data that I believe could be important. To start Mendelian used a pure purple and a pure white flower the data is missing on witch color flower was the father and witch one was the mother after this the plants were inbreed so I believe this data would be important in

2029:

The text under the inheritance scheme with the three generations (red and white) must be changed. A phenotype cannot be dominant or recessive. In a gene-locus with two or more alleles one allele can be dominant over another and other alleles can be recessive or have a dominance hierarchy

1304:

Some parts of the page correctly refer to the fact that during crossover the maternal and paternal chromosomes are paired up and mixed to produce new chromosomes for the offspring, but other parts of the page are written as if maternal or paternal chromosomes are passed down unmodified.

1735:

In the German Knowledge (XXG) there are always many biologists who read new contributions on the discussion pages immediately and answer within a few hours. I have not left any information elsewhere because I do not know these addresses. It would be nice if someone would do that for

1247:

In the first reference it says "The Monk in the Garden : The Lostgvnfjvkbn nhjegj g vjf grn vnr g g jkbbn qle fa fealrlb ndk vj g cm kjlkcm m blmvdlc, mlmm cs...ii based myt project on his dumb ass shit... and Found Genius of Gregor Mendel, the Father of Genetics. Houghton Mifflin"

1159:"mendel also do a experiment.he cross different flowers and as a result 3:1 ratio is Independent assortment occurs during meiosis I in eukaryotic organisms, specifically metaphase I of meiosis, to produce a gamete with a mixture of the organism's maternal and paternal chromosomes." 1016:

The article on Mendel says, "At first Mendel's work was rejected (and it was not widely accepted until after he died)". This article says, "Mendel's results were largely accepted". AFAIK this article is wrong, but I'll leave some time for comment before I change it.

578:

which shows that the sentence was created by splicing two pre-existing sentences and leaving out the bit in the middle. Sorry I can't fix it myself, but I don't understand the subject well enough (that's why I'm reading the article) and would probably make it worse.

2575:

However, this should not lead us to refer to these sources as a matter of priority, otherwise a vicious circle would develop. Campbell and Reece have also noticed, however, that the uniformity rule is mentioned first in some sources, namely in the original sources.

1271:

of Independent Assortment." as it now claims the article. Maybe Tschermak, Correns or De Vries made it or maybe in english papers from Fisher, Bateson, Punnet or Morgan, later. I don't know when the become formally and textually "Laws". So, anyone have the source?--

1346:(assuming diploidy) for any particular trait and that each parent passes a randomly selected copy (allele) of only one of these to its offspring. I removed "of only one of these" since you cannot randomly select more or less than one from a pair of alleles. 941:

and the recessive character is hidden." I am not aware of this being Mendel's own law, but this needs to be included. The other laws are "Law of Segregation" and "Law of Independant Assortmrent". The Law of Dominance is a very important law in genetics.

797:

I moved the figures into a table so that they would be together and in order. They're a little too big to be put on separate lines. Regarding Figure 2, I'm not that happy with it since the 'short hair' trait seems to be represented by a variation in the

2507:

7. "Any of the possible variants of a zygote formed from maternal and paternal chromosomes will occur with equal frequency." This is an impermissible generalisation, because in a number of organisms there is a non-accidental segregation of chromosomes

1570:

with the genetic defect for short tail, because homozygosity is lethal and the embryo dies in the womb. Instead we can use this picture with coat colour genetics of cattle as example for independant assortment, as it is very similar to the

2721: 2503:

6. The zygote will normally end up with 23 chromosomes pairs, but the origin of any particular chromosome will be randomly selected from paternal or maternal chromosomes. This contributes to the genetic variability of progeny." Okay.

691:

This article needs a lot of work. While all the information is there, it is repetitive and disorganized. In addition, some of what is describes is non-Mendelian. Let's see if we can get this thing worked up to a great article!

2834: 1609:

The First Mendelian Rule is the uniformity rule saying that by crossing two different homozygous individuals all offspring in the first generation have the same genotype (heterozygot) and same phenotype (dominant trait).

1786:

the text module on top of the article mean? I am a Biology college teacher, I have the expertise improve the article. I have listed valid literature sources. So if anyone has anything against it, please comment here.

245: 2824: 1518:. The Punnet square doesn't belong in the introduction about the Mendelian principles as first image. Of course we use it for illustration, but then keeping the correct order of Mendel's discoveries explained. 1613:

The Second Mendelian Rule is the rule of segregation saying that by crossing two heterozygous individuals 25 % will be homozygous for one allele, 50 % heterozygous and 25 % homozygous for the other allele.

369: 141: 2641:. If there is to be a discussion of this discovery which occurred during the interval, it should should be based on academic sources discussing the relevance. Without such sources, it is a distraction. 2464:

statement of facts without criminalizing biological organisms for what happens naturally inside of them: "There are many deviations of the principle of independant assortment due to genetic linkage."

35: 2839: 921:

trait from different homozygotic individuals to their offspring. That some of the writeup is ambiguous may not be an argument for removing the entry... please check your books on elementary biology.

2689: 1386: 1216:

In the first paragraph, the line: "They were initially derived from the work of Gregor Mendel..." would it be "They" or "It" since it is referring to Mendelian Inheritance, not "Inheritance

447:

Moved this from the article, I think most of this is already covered in the article and other didn't realize that this kind of information belongs in Talk, but I haven't checked closely. --

2300: 2222: 2183: 1801: 1706:. Yes, you have proposed your changes here, but that was less than two days ago which is hardly enough tome for others to comment. Did you drop informative notices (in accordance with 280: 1759:

The picture of intermediate inheritance with the rule of segregation cannot be in the paragraph "Non-Mendelian", because segregation also happens in cases of incomplete dominance.

2879: 270: 2472:

cell does have one complete set of chromosomes. So here the formulation must be: "... to produce a zygote and a new organsim, in which every cell has two sets of chromosomes (

2285:. To understand the arrows in the illustrations, one must look at each flower of the offspring generation and then trace back which allele it received from each parent plant. 937:

There is a law of Dominance that states that "in a heterozygous condition when the dominant and recessive alleles are present simultaneously, the phenotype of the organism is

760:. There are probably others. Some of the google results combined the first three principles into Mendel's First Law; Others combined the first four into Mendel's First Law. 1782: 160: 74: 917:

genes on different loci and how those can be recombined in the offspring (especially in the grandchildren and downwards), the law of uniformity treats the inheritance of a

2849: 131: 1639: 976:'s Third Law, although that could be a subject of debate. This law, however, should not be thrown to the side, but should be at least mentioned in the main article. - 2884: 2869: 2606:

mentions that Mendel was not the first to describe this principle, although he probably did more thorough research and publicised it. Worth a mention here as well? --

2191: 240: 990:

Whaa... who removed the law of dominance?! It's a very important law! Just because we're Knowledge (XXG) doesn't mean we can change what is scientifically accepted!

1365:

The Law of independent assortment is generally considered the Third law (sometimes the second), but the law of dominance is considered the first, never the third.--

2187: 107: 2221:, I'm glad to see someone working on this article. I've only had a chance to skim the old article and your suggestions so far, but a quick question: In your file 1606:

The Mendelian inheritance doesn't follow strict "laws". There are exeptions. It would be appropriate to speak of Mendelian rules in English literature as well.

1603:

By the way: Champbell called the rule of segregation the first Mendelian law, which is wrong. In the original German literature the uniformity rule comes first.

1390: 570:

If the two alleles differ, then one, the dominant allele, is fully expressed in the organism's appearance; the other, the segregate during gamete production.

2874: 2484:

diploid cells merge during fertilization, not one diploid and one haploid. Aneuploidy is not the topic of this article. This belongs in the article meiosis.

2819: 1285:

I'd like a verbatim quotation of Mendel's conclusions. What did he claim and in what terms? (And source, please.) Here or in the article on Mendel himself.

2894: 2844: 903:

I've never heard of any law of dominance, and from reading it it just paraphrases part 3 of Mendel's First Law..I suggest we remove it, it's too redundant

359: 236: 227: 188: 2859: 1617:

The Third Mendelian Rule is the rule of independant assortment due to free combinability of genes provided they are not located on the same chromosome.

165: 2500:

8,388,608 possible combinations." Human gametes do not have 23 pairs of chromosomes! This part of the sentence contradicts what has been said before.

98: 69: 1132:

and early twentieth century ideas on racial hierarcies that have little or nothing to do with Mendelianism, though there is a link to the concept of

2899: 2514:

In my reworked version I expressed it more concise. A numbering of the principles, which are still called laws in the new version, is unnecessary.

335: 2829: 615:

The normal convention is to use the same letter for both, with the dominant being represented by the capital, and the recessive by the lower case.

545:

I too was confused by that, and I support the reordering of these parts of the article so that Mendel's First Law comes before his Second Law. —

647:

The convention is to use a capital for dominant and the lowercase for recessive, both with the same letter. The letter, however, represents the

2864: 1715: 1641: 2889: 2729: 1197: 1169: 1063: 701:

it, there are five parts to Mendel's Laws, and each one was an important divergence from the common theories for inheritance at the time:

1093: 924: 676:

The only time you are going to have two different letters will be when there is codominance and you have two traits being shown at once.

499: 2693: 1954:

It is the other way round. I'm giving you an excuse for the wrong statement. Let's have peace and do something useful for the article.

326: 303: 2854: 1415: 1252: 2333:

Oh thank you, now I got it. There was a small goofy mistake in the colour of the symbol for one allele. I corrected it immediatly.

1637: 1460: 492:

Yy X yy Second cross, F1 with green P | V Yy and yy Second generation of offspring (F2), with an equal proportion of Yy and yy

874:

was developed and used before a molecular basis was found. (Indeed, it contributed to the discovery of that molecular basis.) -

2814: 854:

page should be merged into this page. Segregation already redirects here and I think these topics are best covered together.

44: 651:

characteristic i.e. a flower that has a dominant red gene and a recessive white gene: the heterozygous genotype would be Ww

972:

the other in expression, characters are inherited alternatively on an all-or-nothing basis..." It is also sometimes called

235:

content on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the

913:

This "law" is also known as "Law of Uniformity". While the "Law of Independent Assortment" refers to the independence of

2248: 1760: 1467: 232: 836:

I added a new section to the article. I would appreciate it if someone else looked over it and makes sure it's okay.

2145: 1740: 1446: 1045:

The strange wording appeared on 10th June, probably as vandalism. I've taken the text back to an earlier version.

391: 2667: 2533: 2165: 1310: 219: 968:

states, it "proved subsequently to be subject to many limitations: because one of each pair of hereditary units

2257: 1067: 1432:

I made some new graphics easier to understand. They correspond to the plants Mendel used for his experiments.

1201: 1173: 50: 1113:

resemble each parent be evident as a "throwback", and if so, what is that phenomenon referred to as? Thanks.

1097: 928: 2168:

in such a way that the own section Non-Mendelian here, which is overflowing with content, can be shortened.

1880:

post that includes the user links and your signature, and it all needs to be done in the same edit. More at

1256: 803: 2307:

corner of that image, should the two F1 flowers be shown as heterozygotes? Thanks again for all your time!

2015:

inheritance too, we must mention it in the Principles section, not in the Non-Mendel Inheritance section.

1231: 1193: 1165: 1089: 1059: 2796: 2646: 2277:

show incomplete dominance as well and follow the same inheritance pattern. So the surprise effect in the F

1474: 1453: 1411: 1276: 1027:

Yeah, that's weird. My understanding is that his original work wasn't accepted or rejected, rather it was

851: 1643: 2753: 1370: 1141: 995: 334:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

106:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1627: 616: 318: 297: 2679: 2588: 2559: 2542: 2523: 2435: 2398: 2368: 2338: 2290: 2173: 2151: 2132: 2093: 2061: 2039: 2020: 2000: 1992: 1959: 1912: 1873: 1844: 1835: 1791: 1769: 1750: 1686: 1671: 1654: 1589: 1552: 1523: 1501: 1493: 1485: 1437: 1306: 1290: 1046: 1018: 763:

I'm inclined to use Mendel's Five Principles or Mendel's Five Laws, and spell it out in gory detail.

606: 1707: 904: 21: 2638: 2202: 2115: 2079: 1933: 1892: 1812: 1726: 1623: 1225: 1114: 947: 2712:

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between

2511:. The statements go beyond the scope of this section anyway and there are too many repetitions. 2488:

how they segregate is not explained. The gametogenesis in women and men is different, therefore

2312: 2234: 1118: 981: 427: 1711: 1578: 1532: 2792: 2770: 2741: 2642: 2274: 1988: 1869: 1831: 1572: 1407: 1351: 1272: 103: 2509: 1881: 1188: 2749: 2737: 2611: 2576: 1984: 1859: 1827: 1515: 1366: 1325: 1162:

Haven't had time to read the rest of the article, but clearly this needs to be cleaned up.

1137: 1037: 991: 886: 837: 820: 807: 2104: 1922: 1703: 1635: 487:| V Yy First generation of offspring (F1) All seeds are yellow (Y allele is dominant) 2675: 2584: 2555: 2538: 2519: 2493: 2431: 2394: 2364: 2334: 2286: 2218: 2169: 2147: 2128: 2089: 2057: 2035: 2016: 1996: 1955: 1908: 1840: 1802:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Molecular Biology/Genetics#Possible project consolidation

1787: 1765: 1746: 1682: 1667: 1650: 1585: 1548: 1519: 1497: 1489: 1481: 1433: 1286: 1129: 965: 452: 439: 90: 63: 2552:

Please read the revised version of the article. It shouln't remain in a sandbox forever.

2361:

Please read the revised version of the article. It shouln't remain in a sandbox forever.

1800:

If you would care to look through the talk page that I linked, you would find the thread

737:. Heterozygotic individuals produce gametes with an equal frequency of the two alleles. 574:

The above sentence doesn't make sense. I looked through the article's history and found

2226: 2195: 2160: 2141: 2108: 2072: 1995:

Can you please have a look at my proposals in sections 24 to 26 and tell your opinion.

1926: 1903: 1885: 1805: 1778: 1719: 1663: 1625: 1221: 1205: 943: 538: 511: 2788: 1539: 605:

individual letters. Is this correct? Was I taught wrong, or are both accepted? Thanks

203: 182: 150: 2808: 2630: 2622: 2603: 2580: 2308: 2265: 2230: 1511: 977: 973: 875: 865: 656: 2777: 2766: 2733: 2725: 2634: 1347: 460:

The parts of the previous version I didn't merge. Someone please have another look.

2583:: Biologie. Spektrum-Verlag Heidelberg-Berlin 2003, ISBN 3-8274-1352-4, page 295. 1031:

because people didn't understand the significance at the time (and because it had

2144:

Thank you for your advice and your patience. Now I hope I found the right place:

2800: 2774: 2757: 2708: 2697: 2683: 2650: 2615: 2607: 2592: 2563: 2546: 2527: 2439: 2402: 2372: 2342: 2316: 2294: 2238: 2206: 2177: 2155: 2136: 2119: 2097: 2083: 2065: 2043: 2024: 2004: 1963: 1937: 1916: 1896: 1848: 1816: 1795: 1773: 1754: 1730: 1690: 1675: 1666:

Please don't make reverts without reading the discussion and the sources first.

1658: 1593: 1556: 1527: 1505: 1441: 1421: 1394: 1374: 1355: 1332: 1329: 1314: 1294: 1280: 1260: 1235: 1177: 1145: 1122: 1101: 1071: 1049: 1040: 1021: 999: 985: 951: 932: 907: 889: 878: 868: 858: 855: 840: 823: 810: 782: 770: 659: 634: 609: 593: 583: 556: 518: 816: 631: 627: 590: 580: 553: 515: 448: 435: 331: 209: 2553: 2515: 2489: 2427: 2362: 2054: 2031: 1980: 1823: 779: 767: 546: 419: 2480:

by a diploid gamete joining with a haploid gamete, is termed aneuploidy."

2056:. If you have any further suggestions for improvement, please let me know. 1645: 413:

Could somebody with a better knowledge of genetics correct this sentence?

2192:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject History of Science#Mendelian inheritance

1567: 961: 399: 2188:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Molecular Biology#Mendelian inheritance

1342:

The Law of Segregation states that every individual possesses a pair of

2765:

learn what they are right here, conveniently within this article. Best,

2473: 2469: 1133: 530: 2468:

the full complement of chromosomes." This sounds confusing, because a

2835:

Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles in Biology and health sciences

2282: 1343: 723:, each inherited from the two parents. Today, we call these alleles. 537:, the law of segregation precedes the law of independent assortment. 474: 467:

one randomly selected gene from each parent for each characteristic.

1620:

Sources: Prof. Ulrich Weber: Biologie Oberstufe and many others.

1328:

redirects here, but has still not been incorporated into the text.

2256: 2247: 2071:

Have you informed any WikiProjects (or other noticeboards) yet? --

1577: 1538: 1531: 1473: 1466: 1459: 1452: 1445: 1400:

I think that's just how your textbook illustrates the concept. ~

802:

of the bunny. I made a different version of this that I uploaded (

1921:

Do not presume that I "have no idea what this is about". That is

1739:

The original publication of Gregor Mendel is written in German.

1156:

This gem of an excerpt from the independent assortment section:

395: 2430:

can you please read the revised version and give your opinion?

2621:

Huntington published in 1872. Mendel published in 1865-6. The

1743: 766:

Is there any preference? Or discussion of where we should go?

385: 15: 2825:

Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Biology and health sciences

589:

I have fixed it; it might have been an accidental deletion.

149: 1696:

You should not unilaterally make sweeping changes such as

239:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 2787:

There is an interesting account of the controversy here:

2182:

Or maybe you posted in low-visibility places. I've found

1649:

It would be also okay to call them Mendelian principles.

815:

Well, no one protested so I went ahead and replaced it. (

2301:

File:Intermediate_inheritance_-_incomplete_dominance.png

2223:

File:Intermediate_inheritance_-_incomplete_dominance.png

1300:

Description of chromosomal inheritance ignores crossover

806:). Unless anyone objects I'll use it to replace Fig. 2. 529:

linked to metaphase I, which comes before anaphase I in

1864: 1854: 1763: 1698: 575: 1783:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Molecular Biology/Genetics

1631:

So there will be a few things to do in this article.

2840:

C-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences

510:

A simpler figure of a dihybrid cross can be found at

1251:

I have a feeling that is not the title of the book.

422:

between two plants or self-pollenated with just one.

330:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 102:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2789:

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aab3846

434:

Done, I think this what the author meant to say. --

2299:Sorry perhaps I wasn't clear with my question. In 500:typing hands getting tired, put this demo in later 2053:Hallo here is a reworked version of the article: 793:Figures start with fig. 3 and after that fig. 1 748:Now, how do we want these? I've seen them call 418:Mendel based theory on they could be both cross- 2186:; how many others did you post? I've posted to 730:). The phenotype reflects the dominant allele. 255:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject History of Science 246:History of Science Collaboration of the Month 116:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Molecular Biology 8: 2880:High-importance history of science articles 846:Suggest merge from "Independent assortment" 2703:Wiki Education assignment: BIOL 412 HONORS 626:have more than 2 alleles, for example see 292: 177: 58: 2850:Low-importance Molecular Biology articles 2460:In the section "independant assortment": 231:, an attempt to improve and organize the 2537:organisms and characteristics he chose. 1128:Your assumptions seem to be a jumble of 2885:WikiProject History of Science articles 2870:All WikiProject Molecular Biology pages 2690:2409:4070:418B:3927:7673:1F4E:6778:8FDC 2532:I intend to outsource most examples of 744:. In modern terms, genes are unlinked. 726:One allele is dominant over the other ( 294: 258:Template:WikiProject History of Science 179: 60: 19: 2820:Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles 2456:Some more content-related inaccuracies 2393:No more comments? No more objections? 1762:New corrected version of the article: 708:. That is, they are discrete (purple 344:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Statistics 119:Template:WikiProject Molecular Biology 2670:be a useful addition to that section? 1510:The Punnet square was not inveted by 7: 1714:) at, for example, the talk page of 1387:2001:558:6012:1B:5CF8:2FED:C347:768E 721:characteristics have alternate forms 324:This article is within the scope of 96:This article is within the scope of 2875:C-Class history of science articles 600:Symbols for Recessive and Dominant? 49:It is of interest to the following 2895:Low-importance Statistics articles 2845:C-Class Molecular Biology articles 2717: 2713: 2496:are to be mentioned separately. 960:is indeed a very important law in 482:YY X yy Parental generation (P) 14: 2860:High-importance Genetics articles 2783:"Father of scientific misconduct" 1488:) 15:34, 30 September 2019 (UTC) 939:determined by the dominant allele 533:. But in my AP Biology textbook, 2720:. Further details are available 2707: 1081:Vandalization? and other issues. 832:new section: Mendelian mutations 317: 296: 212: 202: 181: 89: 62: 29: 20: 2900:WikiProject Statistics articles 2598:Earlier discovery by Huntington 2229:for posting this more broadly! 364:This article has been rated as 347:Template:WikiProject Statistics 275:This article has been rated as 136:This article has been rated as 2830:C-Class level-4 vital articles 2662:Would adding something on the 2103:you can also drop a notice at 1659:19:37, 30 September 2019 (UTC) 1594:11:48, 30 September 2019 (UTC) 1496:) 11:08, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 1442:11:15, 30 September 2019 (UTC) 696:Parts to Mendelian inheritance 243:. You can also help with the 228:History of Science WikiProject 1: 2865:WikiProject Genetics articles 2748:— Assignment last updated by 2698:10:40, 24 December 2023 (UTC) 2088:Whom should I inform? Where? 1562:Law of independant assortment 1356:10:13, 12 February 2014 (UTC) 1281:00:10, 12 December 2009 (UTC) 1206:09:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC) 1072:22:53, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 952:08:40, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 859:17:23, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 841:16:55, 21 December 2006 (UTC) 824:20:41, 27 December 2006 (UTC) 811:22:18, 21 December 2006 (UTC) 610:02:38, 18 November 2005 (UTC) 594:16:24, 19 November 2005 (UTC) 557:16:26, 19 November 2005 (UTC) 338:and see a list of open tasks. 158:This article is supported by 110:and see a list of open tasks. 99:WikiProject Molecular Biology 2593:07:52, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 2564:07:04, 21 October 2019 (UTC) 2440:10:35, 2 November 2019 (UTC) 2403:06:45, 30 October 2019 (UTC) 2373:07:03, 21 October 2019 (UTC) 2343:05:20, 19 October 2019 (UTC) 2317:15:36, 18 October 2019 (UTC) 2295:10:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC) 2239:22:13, 17 October 2019 (UTC) 2207:20:59, 17 October 2019 (UTC) 2178:06:28, 17 October 2019 (UTC) 1261:23:02, 6 December 2009 (UTC) 1236:23:11, 2 December 2009 (UTC) 1178:21:10, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 1146:19:38, 22 October 2009 (UTC) 1123:15:12, 13 October 2009 (UTC) 1000:17:49, 7 February 2014 (UTC) 986:00:41, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 933:22:43, 19 January 2008 (UTC) 225:This article is part of the 2890:C-Class Statistics articles 2547:20:04, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 2528:07:40, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 2156:16:48, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 2137:08:34, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 2120:13:13, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 2098:23:18, 8 October 2019 (UTC) 2084:21:50, 8 October 2019 (UTC) 2066:21:42, 8 October 2019 (UTC) 2044:13:31, 5 October 2019 (UTC) 2025:12:42, 5 October 2019 (UTC) 2005:06:43, 4 October 2019 (UTC) 1964:21:23, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 1938:20:45, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 1917:17:54, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 1897:20:44, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 1849:17:11, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 1817:20:31, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 1796:10:53, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 1774:19:00, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 1755:19:00, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 1731:08:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC) 1691:08:05, 2 October 2019 (UTC) 1676:07:57, 2 October 2019 (UTC) 1557:07:16, 4 October 2019 (UTC) 1528:06:39, 4 October 2019 (UTC) 1506:07:39, 4 October 2019 (UTC) 1315:01:22, 3 January 2011 (UTC) 1012:Initial acceptance (or not) 660:06:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 635:01:19, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 519:16:24, 18 August 2006 (UTC) 261:history of science articles 2916: 2775:19:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC) 2758:17:40, 10 March 2024 (UTC) 2684:19:11, 27 March 2023 (UTC) 2010:Oranisation of the article 1375:17:12, 13 April 2014 (UTC) 890:01:24, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 879:15:34, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 869:01:16, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 549:02:36, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC) 541:01:19, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC) 430:04:49, Jan 23, 2004 (UTC) 394:of this article appear in 281:project's importance scale 122:Molecular Biology articles 2855:C-Class Genetics articles 2668:Non-Mendelian Inheritance 2651:03:05, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 2616:21:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC) 2534:Non-Mendelian inheritance 2166:Non-Mendelian inheritance 1422:01:56, 5 March 2018 (UTC) 1395:21:00, 3 March 2018 (UTC) 1333:17:38, 10 June 2013 (UTC) 1295:15:21, 16 July 2011 (UTC) 1102:00:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 1050:10:50, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 1041:12:55, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 1022:10:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 455:10:25, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC) 363: 312: 274: 220:History of science portal 197: 157: 135: 84: 57: 1702:without first obtaining 1566:There are no homozygous 908:03:40, 13 May 2007 (UTC) 804:Image:Dihybrid cross.png 783:07:29, 19 May 2006 (UTC) 771:03:38, 19 May 2006 (UTC) 584:19:24, 28 May 2005 (UTC) 442:10:30, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC) 2801:12:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC) 2666:variable that leads to 1868:will not have notified 1858:will not have notified 733:Gametes are created by 161:the Genetics task force 2815:C-Class vital articles 2261: 2252: 1582: 1543: 1536: 1478: 1471: 1464: 1457: 1450: 852:Independent assortment 742:independent assortment 740:Different traits have 706:Characters are unitary 327:WikiProject Statistics 154: 2724:. Student editor(s): 2260: 2251: 1876:. You need to make a 1581: 1542: 1535: 1477: 1470: 1463: 1456: 1449: 153: 43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 36:level-4 vital article 2604:Huntington's#History 1716:WikiProject Genetics 1599:Mendelian principles 1573:coat colour genetics 1183: 758:Mendelian Principles 728:Concept of Dominance 2732:). Peer reviewers: 2639:Erich von Tschermak 2625:refers to the 1900 778:genetics articles. 754:Mendel's Hypotheses 350:Statistics articles 2722:on the course page 2262: 2253: 1583: 1544: 1537: 1479: 1472: 1465: 1458: 1451: 1338:Law of Segregation 735:random segregation 252:History of Science 233:history of science 189:History of Science 155: 45:content assessment 2275:Antirrhinum majus 1710:whilst observing 1634:English sources: 1420: 1361:Numbering of Laws 1324:Just noting that 1196:comment added by 1168:comment added by 1092:comment added by 1074: 1062:comment added by 899:Law of Dominance? 552:Have changed it. 524:Order of article? 498:characteristics. 406: 405: 384: 383: 380: 379: 376: 375: 291: 290: 287: 286: 176: 175: 172: 171: 113:Molecular Biology 104:Molecular Biology 70:Molecular Biology 2907: 2760: 2730:article contribs 2719: 2715: 2711: 2577:Neil A. Campbell 2198: 2111: 2075: 2049:Reworked version 1929: 1888: 1867: 1857: 1808: 1722: 1701: 1516:Reginald Punnett 1404: 1403: 1326:Law of Dominance 1320:Law of Dominance 1239: 1208: 1180: 1152:Cleanup Required 1108:Help in Defining 1104: 1057: 958:Law of Dominance 576:this old version 409:Older discussion 386: 370:importance scale 352: 351: 348: 345: 342: 321: 314: 313: 308: 300: 293: 263: 262: 259: 256: 253: 222: 217: 216: 215: 206: 199: 198: 193: 185: 178: 142:importance scale 124: 123: 120: 117: 114: 93: 86: 85: 80: 77: 66: 59: 42: 33: 32: 25: 24: 16: 2915: 2914: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2805: 2804: 2785: 2747: 2714:2 February 2024 2705: 2659: 2657:Gene Expression 2623:history section 2602:The article on 2600: 2572: 2494:Spermatogenesis 2458: 2280: 2272: 2196: 2109: 2073: 2051: 2012: 1993:Clement Cherlin 1978: 1927: 1886: 1874:Clement Cherlin 1863: 1853: 1836:Clement Cherlin 1806: 1720: 1697: 1601: 1564: 1430: 1401: 1382: 1363: 1340: 1322: 1307:Clement Cherlin 1302: 1268: 1245: 1229: 1214: 1191: 1186: 1163: 1154: 1130:blending theory 1110: 1087: 1083: 1047:Rjm at sleepers 1019:Rjm at sleepers 1014: 966:Merriam-Webster 901: 848: 834: 791: 773:(Signing late) 698: 689: 607:Poisonouslizzie 602: 567: 526: 508: 411: 349: 346: 343: 340: 339: 306: 277:High-importance 260: 257: 254: 251: 250: 218: 213: 211: 192:High‑importance 191: 166:High-importance 121: 118: 115: 112: 111: 78: 72: 40: 30: 12: 11: 5: 2913: 2911: 2903: 2902: 2897: 2892: 2887: 2882: 2877: 2872: 2867: 2862: 2857: 2852: 2847: 2842: 2837: 2832: 2827: 2822: 2817: 2807: 2806: 2784: 2781: 2762: 2704: 2701: 2672: 2671: 2658: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2599: 2596: 2571: 2570:Vicious circle 2568: 2567: 2566: 2457: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2278: 2270: 2263: 2254: 2242: 2241: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2158: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2050: 2047: 2011: 2008: 1977: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1776: 1757: 1737: 1600: 1597: 1563: 1560: 1429: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1381: 1378: 1362: 1359: 1339: 1336: 1321: 1318: 1301: 1298: 1267: 1264: 1244: 1241: 1234:comment added 1213: 1210: 1198:203.115.174.31 1185: 1182: 1170:70.179.172.117 1153: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1109: 1106: 1082: 1079: 1077: 1064:87.192.112.144 1053: 1052: 1043: 1013: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 922: 900: 897: 896: 895: 892: 883: 882: 881: 847: 844: 833: 830: 829: 828: 827: 826: 790: 789:Figure numbers 787: 786: 785: 746: 745: 738: 731: 724: 717: 712:. white, tall 697: 694: 688: 687:Reorganization 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 680: 679: 678: 677: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 640: 639: 638: 637: 620: 619: 601: 598: 597: 596: 566: 565:Scrambled text 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 525: 522: 512:Dihybrid_cross 507: 504: 445: 444: 443: 425: 424: 410: 407: 404: 403: 389: 382: 381: 378: 377: 374: 373: 366:Low-importance 362: 356: 355: 353: 336:the discussion 322: 310: 309: 307:Low‑importance 301: 289: 288: 285: 284: 273: 267: 266: 264: 224: 223: 207: 195: 194: 186: 174: 173: 170: 169: 156: 146: 145: 138:Low-importance 134: 128: 127: 125: 108:the discussion 94: 82: 81: 79:Low‑importance 67: 55: 54: 48: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2912: 2901: 2898: 2896: 2893: 2891: 2888: 2886: 2883: 2881: 2878: 2876: 2873: 2871: 2868: 2866: 2863: 2861: 2858: 2856: 2853: 2851: 2848: 2846: 2843: 2841: 2838: 2836: 2833: 2831: 2828: 2826: 2823: 2821: 2818: 2816: 2813: 2812: 2810: 2803: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2782: 2780: 2779: 2776: 2772: 2768: 2761: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2745: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2710: 2702: 2700: 2699: 2695: 2691: 2686: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2631:Hugo de Vries 2629:discovery by 2628: 2624: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2597: 2595: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2582: 2581:Jane B. Reece 2578: 2569: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2554: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2535: 2530: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2516: 2512: 2510: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2495: 2491: 2485: 2481: 2477: 2475: 2471: 2465: 2461: 2455: 2441: 2437: 2433: 2429: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2404: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2363: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2302: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2276: 2267: 2264: 2259: 2255: 2250: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2162: 2159: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2146: 2143: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2106: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2048: 2046: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2027: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2009: 2007: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1975: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1924: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1905: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1871: 1866: 1861: 1856: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1803: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1784: 1780: 1777: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1764: 1761: 1758: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1741: 1738: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1700: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1678: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1647: 1646: 1644: 1642: 1640: 1638: 1636: 1632: 1629: 1628: 1626: 1624: 1621: 1618: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1604: 1598: 1596: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1580: 1576: 1574: 1569: 1561: 1559: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1541: 1534: 1530: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1512:Gregor Mendel 1508: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1476: 1469: 1462: 1455: 1448: 1444: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1379: 1377: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1360: 1358: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1337: 1335: 1334: 1331: 1327: 1319: 1317: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1299: 1297: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1283: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1265: 1263: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1249: 1242: 1240: 1237: 1233: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1211: 1209: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1190: 1184:mendel's view 1181: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1160: 1157: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1107: 1105: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1094:65.189.30.239 1091: 1080: 1078: 1075: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1051: 1048: 1044: 1042: 1039: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1020: 1011: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 988: 987: 983: 979: 975: 971: 967: 963: 959: 955: 954: 953: 949: 945: 940: 936: 935: 934: 930: 926: 925:217.210.42.17 923: 920: 916: 912: 911: 910: 909: 906: 898: 894:I agree merge 893: 891: 888: 884: 880: 877: 872: 871: 870: 867: 863: 862: 861: 860: 857: 853: 845: 843: 842: 839: 831: 825: 822: 818: 814: 813: 812: 809: 805: 801: 796: 795: 794: 788: 784: 781: 776: 775: 774: 772: 769: 764: 761: 759: 755: 751: 750:Mendel's Laws 743: 739: 736: 732: 729: 725: 722: 718: 715: 711: 707: 704: 703: 702: 695: 693: 686: 675: 674: 673: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 661: 658: 654: 650: 646: 645: 644: 643: 642: 641: 636: 633: 629: 624: 623: 622: 621: 618: 614: 613: 612: 611: 608: 599: 595: 592: 588: 587: 586: 585: 582: 577: 572: 571: 564: 558: 555: 551: 550: 548: 544: 543: 542: 540: 536: 532: 523: 521: 520: 517: 513: 505: 503: 502: 501: 494: 493: 489: 488: 484: 483: 479: 478: 477:of the gene. 476: 469: 468: 463: 462: 461: 456: 454: 450: 441: 437: 433: 432: 431: 429: 423: 421: 416: 415: 414: 408: 401: 397: 393: 390: 388: 387: 371: 367: 361: 358: 357: 354: 337: 333: 329: 328: 323: 320: 316: 315: 311: 305: 302: 299: 295: 282: 278: 272: 269: 268: 265: 248: 247: 242: 238: 234: 230: 229: 221: 210: 208: 205: 201: 200: 196: 190: 187: 184: 180: 167: 164:(assessed as 163: 162: 152: 148: 147: 143: 139: 133: 130: 129: 126: 109: 105: 101: 100: 95: 92: 88: 87: 83: 76: 71: 68: 65: 61: 56: 52: 46: 38: 37: 27: 23: 18: 17: 2793:Lewisiscrazy 2786: 2763: 2746: 2742:HabitsofEelz 2706: 2687: 2673: 2663: 2643:BiologicalMe 2635:Carl Correns 2626: 2601: 2573: 2531: 2518: 2513: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2486: 2482: 2478: 2466: 2462: 2459: 2304: 2052: 2028: 2013: 1989:Bestiasonica 1979: 1877: 1870:Bestiasonica 1832:Bestiasonica 1679: 1662: 1648: 1633: 1630: 1622: 1619: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1605: 1602: 1584: 1565: 1545: 1509: 1480: 1431: 1428:New Graphics 1405: 1383: 1364: 1341: 1323: 1303: 1284: 1273:Bestiasonica 1269: 1253:72.208.36.87 1250: 1246: 1243:Reference #1 1217: 1215: 1187: 1161: 1158: 1155: 1111: 1084: 1076: 1054: 1032: 1028: 1015: 969: 957: 938: 918: 914: 902: 850:Perhaps the 849: 835: 799: 792: 765: 762: 757: 753: 749: 747: 741: 734: 727: 720: 713: 709: 705: 699: 690: 652: 648: 603: 573: 569: 568: 534: 527: 509: 496: 495: 491: 490: 486: 485: 481: 480: 471: 470: 465: 464: 459: 458: 457: 446: 426: 417: 412: 365: 325: 276: 244: 237:project page 226: 159: 137: 97: 51:WikiProjects 34: 2750:Cara.begley 2738:Eliseforget 2184:this notice 1985:Miguelferig 1860:Miguelferig 1828:Miguelferig 1380:Actual Data 1367:Miguelferig 1266:Anacronisms 1230:—Preceding 1192:—Preceding 1164:—Preceding 1088:—Preceding 1058:—Preceding 1038:Tocharianne 992:Kingsocarso 887:Tocharianne 838:Tocharianne 821:Tocharianne 808:Tocharianne 617:Humpelfluch 2809:Categories 2718:3 May 2024 2688:Not valid 2676:Eric Lotze 2664:additional 2585:Sciencia58 2556:Sciencia58 2539:Sciencia58 2520:Sciencia58 2432:Sciencia58 2395:Sciencia58 2365:Sciencia58 2335:Sciencia58 2287:Sciencia58 2219:Sciencia58 2170:Sciencia58 2148:Sciencia58 2129:Sciencia58 2090:Sciencia58 2058:Sciencia58 2036:Sciencia58 2017:Sciencia58 1997:Sciencia58 1956:Sciencia58 1909:Sciencia58 1841:Sciencia58 1788:Sciencia58 1766:Sciencia58 1747:Sciencia58 1708:WP:APPNOTE 1683:Sciencia58 1668:Sciencia58 1651:Sciencia58 1586:Sciencia58 1575:of dogs. 1549:Sciencia58 1520:Sciencia58 1498:Sciencia58 1490:Sciencia58 1482:Sciencia58 1434:Sciencia58 1287:Tsinfandel 1220:", right? 964:. As the 864:I agree. - 628:Blood type 420:pollinated 341:Statistics 332:statistics 304:Statistics 241:discussion 2490:Oogenesis 2305:top-right 2227:Redrose64 2161:Redrose64 2142:Redrose64 2032:Epistasis 1904:Redrose64 1865:this edit 1855:This edit 1779:Redrose64 1704:consensus 1568:Manx cats 1514:, but by 1222:Melara... 970:dominates 944:Proquence 915:different 905:Out slide 876:Madeleine 866:Madeleine 817:Manx cats 716:. dwarf). 649:recessive 539:Auricfuzz 392:Summaries 39:is rated 2309:Ajpolino 2266:Ajpolino 2231:Ajpolino 1712:WP:MULTI 1194:unsigned 1166:unsigned 1115:Ledboots 1090:unsigned 1060:unsigned 978:Ano-User 962:genetics 885:I agree 719:Genetic 400:genetics 75:Genetics 2778:Lhi1001 2767:Lhi1001 2734:Ard1174 2726:Lhi1001 2474:diploid 2470:haploid 2190:and to 1882:WP:Echo 1664:Redrose 1348:Maniacq 1344:alleles 1232:undated 1212:Grammar 1189:mendel' 1134:atavism 1029:ignored 819:rule!) 535:Biology 531:meiosis 475:alleles 368:on the 279:on the 140:on the 41:C-class 2637:, and 2608:Murata 2283:zygote 2199:rose64 2112:rose64 2105:WP:VPM 2076:rose64 1930:rose64 1923:WP:NPA 1889:rose64 1862:, and 1809:rose64 1723:rose64 1330:Danger 1138:Paul B 974:Mendel 919:single 856:Dr d12 756:, and 657:Dallas 506:Figure 428:silsor 47:scale. 1976:Hallo 1699:these 1402:Amory 1033:a lot 800:color 632:AndyZ 591:AndyZ 581:Heron 554:AndyZ 516:neffk 449:Lexor 436:Lexor 28:This 2797:talk 2771:talk 2754:talk 2716:and 2694:talk 2680:talk 2647:talk 2612:talk 2589:talk 2560:talk 2543:talk 2524:talk 2492:and 2476:). 2436:talk 2428:TedE 2399:talk 2369:talk 2339:talk 2313:talk 2291:talk 2235:talk 2203:talk 2201:🌹 ( 2194:. -- 2174:talk 2152:talk 2133:talk 2116:talk 2114:🌹 ( 2107:. -- 2094:talk 2080:talk 2078:🌹 ( 2062:talk 2040:talk 2021:talk 2001:talk 1991:and 1981:TedE 1960:talk 1934:talk 1932:🌹 ( 1925:. -- 1913:talk 1893:talk 1891:🌹 ( 1884:. -- 1845:talk 1834:and 1824:TedE 1813:talk 1811:🌹 ( 1792:talk 1781:The 1770:talk 1751:talk 1727:talk 1725:🌹 ( 1718:? -- 1687:talk 1672:talk 1655:talk 1590:talk 1553:talk 1524:talk 1502:talk 1494:talk 1486:talk 1438:talk 1391:talk 1371:talk 1352:talk 1311:talk 1291:talk 1277:talk 1257:talk 1226:talk 1202:talk 1174:talk 1142:talk 1119:talk 1098:talk 1068:talk 996:talk 982:talk 956:The 948:talk 929:talk 655:Rr. 547:Brim 453:Talk 440:Talk 398:and 396:gene 271:High 2217:Hi 2197:Red 2110:Red 2074:Red 1928:Red 1887:Red 1878:new 1872:or 1807:Red 1736:me. 1721:Red 1228:) 780:Ted 768:Ted 653:not 360:Low 132:Low 2811:: 2799:) 2791:-- 2773:) 2756:) 2744:. 2740:, 2736:, 2696:) 2682:) 2674:-- 2649:) 2633:, 2627:re 2614:) 2591:) 2579:, 2562:) 2545:) 2526:) 2438:) 2401:) 2371:) 2341:) 2315:) 2293:) 2237:) 2205:) 2176:) 2154:) 2135:) 2118:) 2096:) 2082:) 2064:) 2042:) 2023:) 2003:) 1987:, 1983:, 1962:) 1936:) 1915:) 1895:) 1847:) 1830:, 1826:, 1815:) 1794:) 1772:) 1753:) 1745:. 1729:) 1689:) 1674:) 1657:) 1592:) 1555:) 1526:) 1504:) 1440:) 1414:• 1410:• 1393:) 1373:) 1354:) 1313:) 1293:) 1279:) 1259:) 1204:) 1176:) 1144:) 1136:. 1121:) 1100:) 1070:) 998:) 984:) 950:) 931:) 752:, 714:vs 710:vs 630:. 579:-- 514:. 168:). 73:: 2795:( 2769:( 2752:( 2728:( 2692:( 2678:( 2645:( 2610:( 2587:( 2558:( 2541:( 2522:( 2434:( 2397:( 2367:( 2337:( 2311:( 2289:( 2279:2 2271:2 2233:( 2172:( 2150:( 2131:( 2092:( 2060:( 2038:( 2030:( 2019:( 1999:( 1958:( 1911:( 1843:( 1790:( 1768:( 1749:( 1685:( 1670:( 1653:( 1588:( 1551:( 1522:( 1500:( 1492:( 1484:( 1436:( 1418:) 1416:c 1412:t 1408:u 1406:( 1389:( 1369:( 1350:( 1309:( 1289:( 1275:( 1255:( 1238:. 1224:( 1218:s 1200:( 1172:( 1140:( 1117:( 1096:( 1066:( 994:( 980:( 946:( 927:( 451:| 438:| 402:. 372:. 283:. 249:. 144:. 53::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index