Talk:Progressive Party (South Korea, 2017)

2390:. Based on the sources brought forward to date, and cited in the article, "left-wing" is the majority characterization, although there was also a source cited on the talk page describing it as far-left (in this regard, please note that I am relying on machine translations and such translations may not be totally reliable). Unless the balance of sources changes, my recommendation is that you focus on describing the Progressive Party as primarily "left-wing." You may wish to note the contexts or grounds in which other reliable sources describe it as "far-left," but this should be addressed with specificity regarding its context. I hope this has been helpfl in resolving your differing views 204: 183: 214: 155: 1015:(진보정당 운동), it can be said that the party is a 'progressivist' party by synthesizing various contents. The same is true for 'left-wing populism'. Didn't I tell you? The current version was just uploaded after interpreting the sentence. You are only focusing on the presence or absence of the word 'left-wing populism', and if that logics, there is nothing you can write on the Minjung Party ideology. -- 33: 2354: 2376:, I am responding to the third opinion request in this matter. At the outset, I note that discussions regarding a "left/right" political spectrum can be difficult as they raise issues of context: does a party's position on a political spectrum refer to how it is globally situated, or nationally situated? For this reason, it is important to be specific in our edits and avoid 2105:

the European or American sense are legally restricted or prohibited. Politicians like AOC in the United States who openly oppose capitalism are difficult to operate in the South Korea. Thus, within the scope of a legally active political party, it tends to be considered whether it is far left, none of which conforms to the far left of international political standards.

85: 64: 1916:

having very pro-North Korean feelings. They just want a very powerful form of 'self-determination'. What the hell does this have to do with the "far-left"???? (However, in the current Progressive Party (South Korea, 2017) article, it is well explained in a footnote that the party is considered to be the "far-left" in the context of South Korean politics.)

1565:. Of course, I understand that Korean political parties often do not specify ideology. But as long as ideologies exist, they must be given absolute priority. There exist sources that describe the party as "nationalism" or "direct democracy," but no sources describe the party as populism. It's just your own research.-- 2243:

recognize the Progressive Party as a center-left "liberal" political party and actively support LGBT rights. And Namuwiki has nothing to do with Knowledge. Media outside of Korea never describe the party as far left. The Progressive Party is far left in South Korea's political standards, but it does

2223:

You clearly said: "In fact, I think it is necessary to consider the source." So why shouldn't the Justice Party be considered a left-wing party? You are excessively oriented towards an overtly friendly description of the Justice Party, and you are negatively portraying other parties. This is against

2104:

are described as "far left" rather than "left-wing" in American media. However, there is no mention of the far left in the information box of the article itself. Unlike the DSA, the Progressive Party does not support socialism or anti-capitalism. In South Korea, the activities of far-left parties in

1958:

I agree that the Justice Party is "leftist". However, "mainstream" is not leftist, so the center left is the mainstream and the left is the non-mainstream. I don't think the Progressive Party is "far left." My position is that the Progressive Party takes a "left to far left" stance that is closer to

1538:

I don't know why, but Jeff6045 was semi-retired. If Jeff6045 no longer discusses and no other objections are given, including Ideology, the writing period will have to be accelerated. I said I would write my opinion in the document within 3 days, but I will revise it. I will write my opinion in the

1452:

HapHaxion's analysis is accurate. Currently, ROK prohibits the activities of communist parties. So Minjung party cannot mention Marxism in Party's Doctrine. However, the majority of party members are Leninists or Far-left Idealists and, if moderate, Left-wing nationalists. Even the majority members

1154:

I am not insisting on this party that 'Progressivism' should disappear. If do what Jeff6045 logics, Progressivism have to disappear. He additionally deduced Party's Doctrine and added 'Progressivism'. 'Left-wing populism' could be justified similarly. And it cannot be defined as 'National populism'

1489:

Although about a month has passed, Jeff6045 is not giving much opinion on the Political Spectrum. And basically, I think the English Knowledge member's not interest in the Minjung Party. But Nevertheless, we took a lot of time. Therefore, if there is no other clear objection, I will write(spectrum

2182:

South Korea has historical experience of past colonial rule and the Korean War. Therefore, in South Korean politics, pro-Japan (even if it does not support racism or ultra-nationalism) is considered far-right, and pro-North Korea (even if it is a nationalist rather than a socialist) is considered

2125:

In fact, depending on the political party, the position of whether it is less by international standards or less by domestic standards has changed somewhat, which is a bit embarrassing. In fact, if that's the case, JP is also considered extreme in Korea. Koreans think JP is more extreme than PPP.

1684:

The reason why they are considered far left is simple. Suppose these policies were realized in South Korea. South Korea will have a huge economic collapse and a security crisis. That's it. That's why the Progressive Party is considered "far-left" in South Korea. There is no misunderstanding among

514:

If Vif12vf's claim is allowed, the ideology place within all South Korean political parties in Knowledge should be emptied. Because in the first place, they weren't stated in Party's Doctrine. Media reports or columns of these parties are all based on the party's policy claims.(Of course, even in

563:

Are you saying that the Minjung Party is an ultra-left party because China is a dictatorship? You only need to remove what is related to China's dictatorship, and you don't need to deny all of China's sources. And neither the Democratic Party nor the Justice Party have 'ideological naming' about

548:

The Democratic Party and the Justice Party have reported in the free press that they are social liberalism and social democracy, respectively. Minjung Party, on the other hand, has not been described by any free press as a Leninist party. Xinhua is inappropriate to use as a source because of its

2084:

The problem is that the Progressive Party is a far-left party in the context of Korean politics. They have more moderate economic and social policies than Labor Party, and they do not have enough elements defined as far-left politics in Knowledge. Labor Party is not a far-left party, so neither

1915:

article in the English Knowledge does not describe DSA as "far-left". The PP, considered far left in South Korea, is much more economically and socially moderate than the DSA. The reason why PP is considered far left is that it has anti-American, anti-Japanese, and even anti-Chinese, while also

1838:

If there is no objection, I will write from left to far left. No source mentions it as centre-left. (I also don't think the Progressive Party is "far left" by international political standards, but it is mentioned in sources. In fact, by international standards, the dpk should also be center to

1725:

JCP is no more moderate than DIE LiNKE. Communism is generally regarded as a far-left ideology, but socialism has a much wider spectrum. And while it is true that the DPK is more conservative in cultural policy than the German CDU, the CDU supports economic liberalism. DPK is less economically

506:

Currently, the formal ideology between left-wing parties in South Korea is not directly presented in the 'party's doctrine'. However, the words and debates they have published in the columns and official media releases are the basis for this. This is true for other documents in Knowledge. Most

529:

Usually we see Anti-revisionists, Leninists, etc Communists as extreme leftists. Minjung party has a lot of these members. Even the most modest group(in party) 'national sovereignty solidarity'(국민주권연대) sees the cause of the collapse of the Soviet Union as 'revisionism' rather than 'socialist

956:

The same is true if you look at the sources of the political parties listed above. References are made to the word in the book put into the source, but it is not stated how the book was interpreted. Moreover, the book is not the official position of the party.(Direction – Social Democracy)

2065:

Just to be clear: There is no policy which states that using Korean language sources for English Knowledge articles is prohibited, because such a policy would be stupid. The onus is on you to show how a Korean source was mistranslated, or why a particular source may be unreliable.

510:

For example, the Justice Party did not mention 'social democracy' in Party's doctrine. Also, the Democratic Party did not specify Party's doctrine 'social liberalism'. However, it is understood that they follow their ideology according to the member's claim and radius of action.

2408:

I agree with you. Therefore, I think infobox's political position should be written only as "left-wing," never as "left-wing to far-left". At the same time, however, you can mention through footnotes that the Progressive Party is considered the far-left in the South Korea.

429:. I searched in Google for either name of the party, plus the names of members (Yoon Jong-oh, Kim Chang-han, Kim Jong-hoon), restricted to the past month (i.e. roughly the period since the formation of the party, to exclude earlier parties by the same names). The result: 1599:) Since this party is a minority party and lacks sources, it is impossible to describe all 'Ideology' through sources. Because of the specificity of minority parties, it was interpreted as an academic extension rather than a simple media source. This is also based on ' 1474:

You are just a source of press articles. It is also a faulty source based on your logic. Of course, I am not against Minjung Party being classified as 'Progressivism'. However, on the basis of your classification as 'Progressivism', my narrative is also acceptable.

2238:

These should be considered in Mediation: The Korean Knowledge describes the Progressive Party as the far left, but it was first added in 2019. The user who added it is an alt-right troller who claims to be a socialist but opposes LGBT rights. In South Korea, most

1617:

If you have any objection, please refer to the English version discussion and the Korean version discussion first. This party 'ideology' belongs to deduce with exception of Direct democracy, whatever media source it uses. Therefore, the above specificity exists.

623:

Xinhua News Agency (新華通訊社) is a state-owned media agency in China, but there is no possibility of distortion in this matter. It is an exaggeration to assume that China is a dictatorship, and that it does not have the credibility of all the media reports.

1075:(Dismantle the foreign-dependent economic system and the monopoly economy of transnational capital and chaebol, and to strengthen the people's authority, establishing a self-reliant economic system centered on the livelihood of economic sovereignty.) 941:

Is it possible to fully equate "inheritance of a progressive party movement" with that of "progressivism"? This, too, is a reasoning. 'Left-wing populism' can also fit into your claims. Because Party's Doctrine already mentions enough of this value.

2385:

in this regard. Although this is the English side of Knowledge, Korean sources are perfectly acceptable. In fact, it is important that we do not limit ourselves to English sources or the anglophone countries. A helpful essay in this regard is

2380:

based on our own evaluation of different positions and attempting to weigh economic issues versus foreign policy issues and the like ourselves. Instead, we must reflect what the sources say, and giving each source its due weight. Please see

2026:

Since the Progressive Party is described as leftist or far-left, it should be described as left-wing or far-left. However, since I also do not consider the Progressive Party to be the far left, I will advocate limiting the far left as a

869:

For example, 'progressivism' in the ideology of minjung party is derived from the phrase "succession of the history and spirit of the progressive party movement."(진보정당 운동의 역사와 정신을 계승) As you know, there is no word 'progressivism' here.

1743:

If there are many left-wing sources and the far-left sources are limited, it would be good to write down the leftist and limit ultra-leftism to the internal faction, but in fact, it seems difficult because there are more far-left

2085:

should the Progressive Party be considered far-left. Indeed, South Korean socialists go so far as to argue that the Progressive Party is not a left-wing party. The reference to the "far-left" should be limited to footnotes.

526:), you can also see that the Democratic Party is looking at the minjung party to the extreme left. and as they say, the minjung party was unable to unite with the Democratic Party because of the Democratic Party's rejection. 1256:

It seems to turn off time on this part accidentally on purpose. I think there is no problem in writing about the level of reference reliability and mention of sources related to the left wing as well as Far-left wing.

667:

2005:

Let's wait until other users join the talk. We can't reach a conclusion even if we argue among ourselves. However, if you make a destructive edit that arbitrarily changes political position, I will cancel that edit.

2050:

Opposite. This is English Knowledge, not Korean Knowledge or Namuwiki. It is unfair to regard PP as the far left only because of its diplomatic orientation, even though there is no extreme left ideological element.

2099:

I support the relative representation of political positions in the information box according to the political environment of each country. But I do not support it if it is about extremism (far-right or far-left).

1685:

South Koreans about this technology, but unfortunately, this is an English Knowledge that people all over the world see. If you write "far-left" on infobox, this party could be misunderstood as a socialist party.

747:

Additionally, I think this process will take at least 6 weeks. Please keep the patient until other multiple users join the talk. If you want to delete ideology for more fair discussion please feel free to do it.

1579:

One thing for sure is that unlike "populism," "direct democracy" is directly referred to in the party's platform, erasing "direct democracy" and adding "left-wing populism" violates Knowledge and regulations.--

1378:

First source that is used to describe the party as progressive is an primary source with partly including original research. This is my mistake. So I replaced the source with non primary&reliable one.

1637:

to claim that the Progressive Party are Marxists or Socialism. The ALKMAION1000 user is just a terrible alt-right troll who has stated in the user's lyrics that he opposes the LGBT human rights movement.

1820:

You repeat the same thing. Political positions should not be changed only by what is written in some sources. The party does not meet the far-left standards defined in the English Knowledge article

1350:

If you regard my reverting as the original research from primary source, you should also delete 'Progressivism'. If going to delete Ideology and leave only Spectrum, I'm going to agreement this. --

1067:(Realizes the world's progressive countries, political parties, groups, human resources and international solidarity, and embodies the community of mankind overflowing with prosperity and peace.) 1643: 1059:) to education, medical care, housing, mobility, energy and information free of charge, and realizes a universal welfare society so that people can enjoy a quality life in all life cycles.) 1668:

It opposes imperialism in the United States, Japan and China. Oppose all unequal relations with major powers. The party strongly protested China's cultural appropriation, insisted that the

1453:

of Minjung Party is the same as Anti-Revisionism. They believe that the collapse of the Soviet Union was not due to a defect in socialism, but because of Gorbachev's revisionist policy. --

1944:

You disagree that the Justice Party is "left-wing". But why does the Progressive Party claim to be the "far-left"??? The two parties stand in solidarity with each other at election time.

1078:

This is a core value that can be called 'left-wing populism'. Although it is not directly written 'left populism'. it can be written for reasons such as 'progressivism'(similar logic). --

721:

I think this discussion will be endless between two of us. I suggest we should just wait until other multiple users join the discussion. I'll try to invite some users to this talk page. (

1140:) So it adequate to see the party has progressivism as ideology. Also, the quote that you have given seems to be national populism rather than left-wing populism in my view and deduce. 1871:

The footnote states that it is considered "far left" in the context of South Korean politics. And the example of DPK is inappropriate. The debate over whether a particular party is "

1708:

party in Germany. In fact, I think the creation of a document should depend on its source. If you write it that way, JP is more moderate than Germany's SPD, so it's center-left.

1757:

In addition, the Progressive Party has some pro-North Korean tendencies beyond pro-North Korea. Some members of the party are suspected of being under orders from North Korea.

1661:

Of course, it is true that the Progressive Party is regarded as a far-left party in the context of South Korean politics. The reasons can be summarized in three main ways.

1036:* 특권과 부패의 정치를 타파하고 직접민주주의를 구현하여 민중주권시대를 완수한다.(Overthrowing the politics of privilege and By implementing direct democracy, it opens the era of sovereignty for the people.) 1740:

I will insist on the narration according to the source. Since there are only left-wing and far-left sources, it seems appropriate to describe it as left-left to far-left.

796:

In particular, the extinguish of economic inner circles(chaebol) and the freeization of education, medical care, and housing are the core values of left-wing populism.(

1430:, although due to the likelihood that they would get banned if they outright said it, there doesn't seem to be any official word from the party on stances like these. 1336:

Again, I'm not against putting 'Progressivism' in party ideology. However, 'Left-wing Populism' may be added for a reason similar to the reason for 'Progressivism'. --

2454: 135: 1513:

Party's Ideology should be set to 'Progressivism', 'Left-wing populism'. And should be set to 'Marxism' and 'Left-wing nationalism' By adding separate Faction.

441:. One of those calls them 'Minjung ("People's") Party' the first time and 'Minjung Party' the second time. The rest only say 'Minjung' without translating it. 2449: 605:. Any personal conclusions of yours (or any other editor) as to Minjung Party's ideology or political spectrum is explicitly banned: we can only cite what 903:

Excuses me? Can you give another better example of the article that reflects user's personal deduce? One example that you mentioned is completely free of

2192: 164: 2020:

In fact, in order to follow the rules, you must maintain the extreme left in the original description, the left wing. Sorry to say destructive editing.

793:

According to the party's doctrine of the minjung party, although the term 'left-wing populism' does not appear, the concept of explanation is similar.

2469: 270: 260: 771:). Orange (B) + White (W) is not the default logo. Just because it appears in the top left corner of the homepage doesn't make it the default logo. 103: 2195:' The main criteria for dividing the left–right political spectrum internationally are social equality and social hierarchy, not foreign policy. 646:) Given that most party spectrum specs follow what the press says, it is persuasive to write Far-left according to the content of the article. -- 1977:? I have little experience with Knowledge, but if the panelist agrees with moderation, I would appreciate it if you could apply for moderation. 2474: 2464: 145: 2119:

It seems difficult to reach an agreement, but what do you think about the use of mediation measures? If you agree, please apply and thank you.

1776:

Almost all of the sources you suggest are South Korean media. The New York Times and other U.S. media never describe this party as far left.

2122:

In fact, I also agree that political parties that are far-left (ideological or even radical left) in the European sense are banned in Korea.

1141: 774:

According to this official homepage, the image I presented(White(B) + Darkgrey(W) + Orange Symbols) is called the 'default logo'(로고 기본). --

927:. These party has left-wing populism in ideology section due to non-primary sources directly mentioning the party as left-wing populist. 334: 305:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a

2459: 1679:

They oppose an FTA with the United States. (However, Europe does not oppose the FTA with Europe because it does not bother South Korea.)

458: 236: 1315:, your claim is similar to this too. You also Deduce that the party ideology is defined as 'Progressivism' through "진보정당의 역사를 계승한다." -- 855:

If so, the information at most political parties should be deleted. This is because the article already uses deduction-based press. --

1647: 1596: 507:

ideologies are not presented in direct words, but ideologies are confirmed through identification through literature interpretation.

920: 445: 1201:? Also, do you think it is proper to add left-wing populism in an article's ideology due to ALKMAION1000's deduce from the soruce? 924: 1897:

in the context of Western politics. (However, I disagree with you adding "far-left" to infobox in the Green Party Korea article.)

1584: 1570: 824: 554: 2101: 1912: 757: 742: 709: 539: 107: 815:

I acknowledge that the party is left-wing populism. However, Leninism is an extreme ideology and requires a direct source. (See

519:

First of all, I have sourced the press release from Shinhwasa. In this article, Minjung Party is viewed as an Far-leftist party.

433: 1442: 227: 188: 111: 1853:

In fact, it is also a problem that there does not seem to be a big difference from the moderate leftist parties such as the

725:) Please do not change the party's ideology or political spectrum without any further discussion on the talk page and keep 797: 1893:

I think the Green Party Korea is more far to the left than the Progressive Party. Because the Green Party Korea is more

44: 2140:

I believe that both international and domestic standards should be considered when considering the political position.

1580: 1566: 1235:

about 'Progressivism'. But you are applying this differently. 'Left-wing populism' can be put in by the same logic. --

820: 550: 92: 69: 1169:

Look at the Party's Docrine that is currently in place, you can see that it is different from 'National populism'. --

1672:

area be handed over to North Korea, abandoned all military and security treaties with the United States, and openly

1108:

Why do you editing without further answers? Even the sources you added don't have the expression 'Progressivism'. --

1600: 606: 476: 406:

in English reliable sources, not the official name. It would be nice if you could provide some examples of that.

380: 296: 1711:

The DPK is more conservative than the mainstream center-right in Germany, so it will be written as center-right

1665:

Pro-North Korea, but not at all interested in socialism. They oppose all forms of sanctions against North Korea.

1701: 2240: 1145: 32: 435: 2359: 2273: 1991:

If you don't join the discussion without objection, I'll change it to left wing ~far raft wing description.

1704:, and this party is evaluated as left-wing to far-left. However, it is substantially more moderate than the 462: 2414: 2249: 2229: 2200: 2173: 2145: 2110: 2090: 2056: 2011: 1949: 1921: 1902: 1884: 1829: 1781: 1731: 1690: 1623: 1608: 1544: 1521: 1495: 1480: 1458: 1355: 1341: 1320: 1262: 1240: 1174: 1160: 1113: 1083: 1020: 962: 947: 875: 860: 805: 779: 705: 673: 651: 629: 569: 535: 448: 444:

I can't find any others calling them "People's Party" (notwithstanding one source still calling them the

2395: 486: 306: 50: 1619: 1604: 1540: 1517: 1491: 1476: 1454: 1351: 1337: 1316: 1258: 1236: 1170: 1156: 1109: 1079: 1016: 977: 958: 943: 898: 871: 856: 801: 775: 716: 701: 669: 647: 625: 592: 565: 531: 2432: 2418: 2399: 2289: 2267: 2253: 2233: 2218: 2204: 2177: 2163: 2149: 2135: 2114: 2094: 2079: 2060: 2045: 2015: 2000: 1986: 1968: 1953: 1939: 1925: 1906: 1888: 1866: 1848: 1833: 1815: 1799: 1785: 1771: 1735: 1720: 1694: 1651: 1627: 1612: 1588: 1574: 1548: 1525: 1499: 1484: 1462: 1447: 1397: 1359: 1345: 1324: 1302: 1266: 1244: 1210: 1178: 1164: 1149: 1117: 1087: 1024: 991: 966: 951: 936: 915:

in south korea. So in this case we can mention the party as progressive. Please see the article about

879: 864: 850: 828: 809: 783: 677: 655: 633: 618: 573: 558: 466: 415: 392: 372: 327: 2184: 1407: 1312: 1290: 2244:

not meet the far left standards in Europe or the United States. (Lazt9312, too, acknowledged this.)

1974: 1438: 1879:-left" or not is a completely different matter. Because the latter is a kind of political stigma. 1760: 1404: 235:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

2428: 2263: 2214: 2159: 2154:

If you agree to request mediation, we would really appreciate it if you would request mediation.

2131: 2041: 1996: 1982: 1964: 1935: 1862: 1844: 1811: 1795: 1767: 1716: 1705: 1393: 1298: 1206: 987: 932: 846: 753: 738: 614: 1752: 2410: 2373: 2245: 2225: 2196: 2169: 2141: 2106: 2086: 2052: 2007: 1945: 1917: 1898: 1880: 1854: 1825: 1821: 1777: 1727: 1686: 1136:

The source is mentioning the party as progressive. (I think you have completely misunderstood

411: 368: 323: 500:

I got not skilled English Because English is not my native language. Please understand this.

2391: 2387: 2382: 2377: 2258:

The mediation request failed due to my inexperience. Could the debater request mediation?

1911:

DSA is considered absolutely "far-left" in the context of American politics. However, the

1419: 916: 837:

WP does not reflect the personal deduce. Please list what the source is saying and follow

523: 388: 355: 219: 1071:대외의존 경제체제와 초국적 자본 및 재벌의 독점경제를 해체하고 민중이 경제정책을 결정할 권한을 강화하여 경제주권이 실현된 민생중심의 자주자립경제체제를 확립한다. 1804: 1385:

Let's just delete party's political spectrum until other editors reveal their opinion.

639: 437: 2188: 1431: 730: 1747: 982:

Can you quote where exactly the source is describing the party as left-wing populist?

798:

http://minjungparty.com/pdf/%EB%AF%BC%EC%A4%91%EB%8B%B9%EA%B0%95%EB%A0%B9_20190929.pdf

643: 213: 203: 182: 2443: 2424: 2369: 2285: 2259: 2210: 2155: 2127: 2075: 2037: 1992: 1978: 1960: 1931: 1858: 1840: 1807: 1791: 1763: 1712: 1639: 1469: 1389: 1331: 1308: 1294: 1286: 1251: 1232: 1226: 1202: 1198: 1137: 1103: 1031: 998: 983: 928: 908: 904: 842: 838: 816: 749: 734: 726: 695: 662: 610: 602: 598: 403: 1562: 722: 439: 407: 364: 319: 432:

I can find newspapers both in South Korea and abroad calling them "Minjung Party"

17: 1634: 1415: 1414:

in South Korea, and I haven't really been able to find any sources that claim a

426: 154: 1700:

In fact, I think it is necessary to consider the source. A similar example is

1372:

Fristly I want to apologize for my late response. Here is my response to you.

485:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a

384: 351: 209: 2423:

I'd agree with the "left wing" statement. Thanks to everyone who commented.

1411: 1192: 1293:. This is completely against WP policy. Don't you think this is a problem? 2278: 2068: 1427: 232: 1669: 1423: 1055:(Provides the right(= free education, free medical care, free housing, 768: 345: 84: 63: 2023:

I will summarize my position on the ideology of the Progressive Party.

1197:, Do you think the source of progressivism in this article is against 1418:

orientation. The party itself and some members also seem to espouse

1875:-right" or not and the debate over whether a particular party is " 700:

If you don't have any other comments for 3 days, I will revert. --

98: 96:, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to 1516:

Party's Spectrum should be set to 'Left wing - Far-left wing'. --

1973:

It seems that the agreement is not going well. Why don't you do

1761:

https://news.jtbc.co.kr/article/article.aspx?news_id=NB12109953

110:. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the 26: 1063:세계 진보적인 국가, 정당, 단체, 인사와 국제연대를 실현하고 공영과 평화가 넘쳐흐르는 인류공동체를 구현한다. 1753:

https://www.naeponews.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=3843

153: 503:

As I argued in the discussion document for user 'Vif12vf'.

1642:("성 소수자 운동 같은 것은 대중의 의식을 질식시키는 자본주의 퇴폐 풍속에 불과하다고 생각합니다.") 1603:', and the preceding discussion also served as a basis. -- 1595:

It was edited as the current document through discussion.(

515:

these cases, 'ideology naming' does not appear directly)

1930:

I would like you to provide evidence, not your opinion.

1539:

document within 24 hours. Please refer to this point. --

1426:-like positions (which are traditionally on the left or 524:

https://www.mk.co.kr/news/politics/view/2020/03/278385/

339: 1805:

http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20180130000855

475:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

343:– According to this party, official english name is 231:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1748:

https://www.asiae.co.kr/article/2020031815423271321

911:) The source is mentioning that the party inherits 309:. No further edits should be made to this section. 489:. No further edits should be made to this section. 1051:으로 제공하고, 모든 생애 주기에 질 높은 삶을 누릴 수 있도록 보편복지사회를 실현한다. 522:if you look at this election coalition issue ( 1011:(진보정당 운동). Of course, even if it write downs 8: 2274:Knowledge:Third opinion#Active disagreements 2183:far-left. However, we do not categorize the 1790:It must be written according to the source. 30: 1231:I have never said that you have againsted 295:The following is a closed discussion of a 177: 58: 496:Minjung Party's ideology and basic logo. 495: 102:. All interested editors are invited to 1726:liberal than CDU. Your view is biased. 179: 60: 638:And I also found a new media source.( 2455:Low-importance Korea-related articles 1644:2001:2D8:643A:D0D5:2430:910C:46B9:799 7: 2168:Make an request mediation yourself. 769:http://minjungparty.com/pages/?p=278 314:The result of the move request was: 225:This article is within the scope of 90:This article is within the scope of 1403:There seems to be agreement at the 165:one or more inactive working groups 49:It is of interest to the following 2450:Start-Class Korea-related articles 1657:Progressive Party is NOT far-left. 907:. (Rather this can be an issue of 335:People's Party (South Korea, 2017) 25: 2193:Far-right politics in South Korea 921:Social Democratic Party (Romania) 2470:Low-importance politics articles 2352: 2102:Democratic Socialists of America 1913:Democratic Socialists of America 358:) 07:09, 21 November 2017 (UTC) 212: 202: 181: 83: 62: 31: 2191:articles into the category of ' 288:Requested move 21 November 2017 265:This article has been rated as 140:This article has been rated as 245:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics 1: 2475:WikiProject Politics articles 2465:Start-Class politics articles 1490:only) it three days later. -- 467:09:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC) 416:11:56, 28 November 2017 (UTC) 393:05:53, 24 November 2017 (UTC) 373:11:56, 28 November 2017 (UTC) 248:Template:WikiProject Politics 239:and see a list of open tasks. 162:This article is supported by 2433:14:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC) 2419:21:36, 16 January 2023 (UTC) 2400:15:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC) 2290:04:14, 16 January 2023 (UTC) 2268:13:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC) 2254:02:58, 15 January 2023 (UTC) 2234:02:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC) 2219:02:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC) 2205:21:15, 14 January 2023 (UTC) 2178:20:59, 14 January 2023 (UTC) 2164:13:53, 14 January 2023 (UTC) 2150:12:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC) 2136:11:54, 14 January 2023 (UTC) 2115:02:34, 14 January 2023 (UTC) 2095:02:20, 14 January 2023 (UTC) 2080:01:59, 14 January 2023 (UTC) 2061:15:47, 13 January 2023 (UTC) 2046:14:06, 13 January 2023 (UTC) 2016:08:31, 13 January 2023 (UTC) 2001:08:17, 13 January 2023 (UTC) 1987:08:14, 12 January 2023 (UTC) 1969:03:37, 12 January 2023 (UTC) 1954:03:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC) 1940:03:05, 12 January 2023 (UTC) 1926:06:48, 11 January 2023 (UTC) 1907:06:31, 11 January 2023 (UTC) 1889:06:25, 11 January 2023 (UTC) 1867:03:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC) 1849:03:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC) 1834:09:14, 10 January 2023 (UTC) 1816:03:41, 10 January 2023 (UTC) 1800:03:39, 10 January 2023 (UTC) 1652:22:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC) 1410:that the party occupies the 925:Direction – Social Democracy 402:. Knowledge cares about the 328:10:03, 7 December 2017 (UTC) 2272:I added this discussion to 1857:if it is simply left-wing. 1786:21:27, 9 January 2023 (UTC) 1772:12:28, 9 January 2023 (UTC) 1736:09:33, 9 January 2023 (UTC) 1721:08:25, 9 January 2023 (UTC) 1695:04:18, 9 January 2023 (UTC) 1375:1. Source of progressivism 120:Knowledge:WikiProject Korea 2491: 2460:WikiProject Korea articles 1601:Knowledge:Ignore all rules 1549:11:20, 14 April 2020 (UTC) 1526:07:46, 14 April 2020 (UTC) 1500:07:15, 14 April 2020 (UTC) 1485:07:04, 14 April 2020 (UTC) 1463:06:56, 14 April 2020 (UTC) 1448:01:10, 10 April 2020 (UTC) 1360:13:29, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 1346:13:18, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 1325:13:15, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 1303:23:34, 23 March 2020 (UTC) 1267:17:02, 21 March 2020 (UTC) 1245:08:21, 21 March 2020 (UTC) 1211:23:26, 20 March 2020 (UTC) 1179:08:27, 21 March 2020 (UTC) 1165:08:14, 21 March 2020 (UTC) 1150:22:59, 20 March 2020 (UTC) 1118:20:26, 20 March 2020 (UTC) 1088:10:57, 19 March 2020 (UTC) 1047:교육·의료·주거·이동·에너지·정보이용의 권리를 1025:10:35, 19 March 2020 (UTC) 1013:Progressive Party Movement 1009:Progressive Party Movement 992:10:24, 19 March 2020 (UTC) 967:10:19, 19 March 2020 (UTC) 952:10:13, 19 March 2020 (UTC) 937:10:03, 19 March 2020 (UTC) 880:09:30, 19 March 2020 (UTC) 865:09:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC) 851:06:32, 19 March 2020 (UTC) 829:22:35, 18 March 2020 (UTC) 810:21:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC) 784:21:10, 18 March 2020 (UTC) 758:23:39, 23 March 2020 (UTC) 743:23:34, 23 March 2020 (UTC) 710:23:03, 23 March 2020 (UTC) 678:17:04, 21 March 2020 (UTC) 656:09:26, 19 March 2020 (UTC) 634:08:53, 19 March 2020 (UTC) 619:06:25, 19 March 2020 (UTC) 574:05:45, 19 March 2020 (UTC) 559:22:31, 18 March 2020 (UTC) 540:21:05, 18 March 2020 (UTC) 271:project's importance scale 146:project's importance scale 123:Template:WikiProject Korea 1628:21:49, 12 June 2020 (UTC) 1613:21:41, 12 June 2020 (UTC) 1589:10:50, 10 June 2020 (UTC) 1575:10:48, 10 June 2020 (UTC) 1504:To summarize my argument. 1398:04:56, 2 April 2020 (UTC) 564:themselves Officially. -- 549:links to dictatorship. -- 264: 197: 161: 139: 78: 57: 1702:Japanese Communist Party 482:Please do not modify it. 302:Please do not modify it. 1597:Discussion of Korean WP 1285:Your input is based on 1155:by other provisions. -- 530:self-contradiction'. -- 450:, apparently in error). 1382:2. Political spectrum 767:Look at this homepage( 158: 126:Korea-related articles 106:and contribute to the 39:This article is rated 2360:third opinion request 2209:Mediation requested. 157: 2185:Anti-Japan Tribalism 1005:Progressive Movement 913:progressive movement 228:WikiProject Politics 1975:Knowledge:Mediation 1706:The Left (Germany) 789:Left-wing populism 446:New People's Party 381:party constitution 159: 45:content assessment 18:Talk:Minjung Party 2405: 2404: 1855:Green Party Korea 1822:Far-left Politics 1633:It is disgusting 1309:original research 1287:original research 400:Relisting comment 375: 285: 284: 281: 280: 277: 276: 251:politics articles 176: 175: 172: 171: 93:WikiProject Korea 16:(Redirected from 2482: 2356: 2355: 2349: 2348: 2283: 2073: 1473: 1335: 1255: 1230: 1196: 1107: 1035: 1002: 981: 902: 720: 699: 666: 607:reliable sources 596: 484: 404:most common name 359: 342: 304: 253: 252: 249: 246: 243: 222: 217: 216: 206: 199: 198: 193: 185: 178: 128: 127: 124: 121: 118: 104:join the project 87: 80: 79: 74: 66: 59: 42: 36: 35: 27: 21: 2490: 2489: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2440: 2439: 2353: 2288: 2279: 2078: 2069: 1839:centre-right.) 1659: 1467: 1446: 1420:anti-capitalist 1329: 1307:If my claim is 1249: 1224: 1190: 1101: 1029: 996: 975: 917:Podemos (Spain) 896: 791: 765: 714: 693: 660: 590: 498: 493: 480: 338: 300: 290: 250: 247: 244: 241: 240: 220:Politics portal 218: 211: 191: 125: 122: 119: 116: 115: 72: 43:on Knowledge's 40: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2488: 2486: 2478: 2477: 2472: 2467: 2462: 2457: 2452: 2442: 2441: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2403: 2402: 2365: 2364: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2292: 2277: 2236: 2189:Lee Young-hoon 2180: 2123: 2120: 2097: 2067: 2034: 2033:Inner faction: 2031: 2028: 2024: 2021: 1971: 1909: 1891: 1758: 1755: 1750: 1745: 1741: 1709: 1683: 1681: 1680: 1677: 1666: 1658: 1655: 1631: 1630: 1615: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1529: 1528: 1514: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1502: 1465: 1436: 1371: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1348: 1313:primary source 1291:primary source 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1167: 1142:121.167.168.75 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1073: 1072: 1065: 1064: 1053: 1052: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1027: 1003:And it is not 973: 972: 971: 970: 969: 939: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 882: 867: 832: 831: 790: 787: 764: 761: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 680: 636: 581: 580: 579: 578: 577: 576: 543: 542: 527: 520: 497: 494: 492: 491: 477:requested move 471: 470: 469: 454: 453: 452: 451: 442: 419: 418: 396: 395: 379:For this, see 333: 331: 312: 311: 297:requested move 291: 289: 286: 283: 282: 279: 278: 275: 274: 267:Low-importance 263: 257: 256: 254: 237:the discussion 224: 223: 207: 195: 194: 192:Low‑importance 186: 174: 173: 170: 169: 160: 150: 149: 142:Low-importance 138: 132: 131: 129: 88: 76: 75: 73:Low‑importance 67: 55: 54: 48: 37: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2487: 2476: 2473: 2471: 2468: 2466: 2463: 2461: 2458: 2456: 2453: 2451: 2448: 2447: 2445: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2407: 2406: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2384: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2366: 2362: 2361: 2351: 2350: 2293: 2291: 2287: 2284: 2282: 2275: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2242: 2237: 2235: 2231: 2227: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2181: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2124: 2121: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2103: 2098: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2077: 2074: 2072: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2032: 2029: 2025: 2022: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2004: 2003: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1914: 1910: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1806: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1762: 1759: 1756: 1754: 1751: 1749: 1746: 1742: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1678: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1656: 1654: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1636: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1616: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1559: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1512: 1511: 1503: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1471: 1466: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1444: 1440: 1435: 1434: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1406: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1386: 1383: 1380: 1376: 1373: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1333: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1253: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1228: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1194: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1105: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1076: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1058: 1050: 1046: 1045: 1033: 1028: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1000: 995: 994: 993: 989: 985: 979: 974: 968: 964: 960: 955: 954: 953: 949: 945: 940: 938: 934: 930: 926: 922: 918: 914: 910: 906: 900: 895: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 881: 877: 873: 868: 866: 862: 858: 854: 853: 852: 848: 844: 840: 836: 835: 834: 833: 830: 826: 822: 818: 814: 813: 812: 811: 807: 803: 799: 794: 788: 786: 785: 781: 777: 772: 770: 762: 760: 759: 755: 751: 745: 744: 740: 736: 732: 728: 724: 718: 712: 711: 707: 703: 697: 679: 675: 671: 664: 659: 658: 657: 653: 649: 645: 641: 637: 635: 631: 627: 622: 621: 620: 616: 612: 609:have to say. 608: 604: 600: 594: 589: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 575: 571: 567: 562: 561: 560: 556: 552: 547: 546: 545: 544: 541: 537: 533: 528: 525: 521: 518: 517: 516: 512: 508: 504: 501: 490: 488: 483: 478: 473: 472: 468: 464: 460: 459:59.149.124.29 456: 455: 449: 447: 443: 440: 438: 436: 434: 431: 430: 428: 424: 421: 420: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 398: 397: 394: 390: 386: 382: 378: 377: 376: 374: 370: 366: 362: 357: 353: 349: 347: 341: 340:Minjung Party 336: 330: 329: 325: 321: 317: 310: 308: 303: 298: 293: 292: 287: 272: 268: 262: 259: 258: 255: 238: 234: 230: 229: 221: 215: 210: 208: 205: 201: 200: 196: 190: 187: 184: 180: 167: 166: 156: 152: 151: 147: 143: 137: 134: 133: 130: 113: 112:documentation 109: 105: 101: 100: 95: 94: 89: 86: 82: 81: 77: 71: 68: 65: 61: 56: 52: 46: 38: 34: 29: 28: 19: 2411:Mureungdowon 2374:Mureungdowon 2358:Response to 2357: 2280: 2246:Mureungdowon 2226:Mureungdowon 2197:Mureungdowon 2170:Mureungdowon 2142:Mureungdowon 2107:Mureungdowon 2087:Mureungdowon 2070: 2053:Mureungdowon 2008:Mureungdowon 1946:Mureungdowon 1918:Mureungdowon 1899:Mureungdowon 1894: 1881:Mureungdowon 1876: 1872: 1826:Mureungdowon 1778:Mureungdowon 1728:Mureungdowon 1687:Mureungdowon 1682: 1673: 1660: 1632: 1620:ALKMAION1000 1605:ALKMAION1000 1541:ALKMAION1000 1518:ALKMAION1000 1492:ALKMAION1000 1477:ALKMAION1000 1455:ALKMAION1000 1432: 1387: 1384: 1381: 1377: 1374: 1370: 1352:ALKMAION1000 1338:ALKMAION1000 1317:ALKMAION1000 1259:ALKMAION1000 1237:ALKMAION1000 1189: 1171:ALKMAION1000 1157:ALKMAION1000 1110:ALKMAION1000 1080:ALKMAION1000 1077: 1074: 1066: 1056: 1054: 1048: 1017:ALKMAION1000 1012: 1008: 1007:(진보 운동) but 1004: 978:ALKMAION1000 959:ALKMAION1000 944:ALKMAION1000 912: 899:ALKMAION1000 872:ALKMAION1000 857:ALKMAION1000 802:ALKMAION1000 795: 792: 776:ALKMAION1000 773: 766: 746: 717:ALKMAION1000 713: 702:ALKMAION1000 692: 670:ALKMAION1000 648:ALKMAION1000 626:ALKMAION1000 593:ALKMAION1000 566:ALKMAION1000 532:ALKMAION1000 513: 509: 505: 502: 499: 481: 474: 422: 399: 383:. Thanks. -- 360: 344: 332: 315: 313: 301: 294: 266: 226: 163: 141: 97: 91: 51:WikiProjects 2392:JArthur1984 1635:McCarthyism 1416:centre-left 1388:Thank you. 597:Please see 487:move review 307:move review 41:Start-class 2444:Categories 2241:socialists 1959:the left. 350:. Thanks. 108:discussion 2388:WP:GLOBAL 2036:far left 2030:left wing 1895:socialism 1433:HapHaxion 1422:-like or 1412:left-wing 457:Regards, 2425:Lazt9312 2383:WP:UNDUE 2378:WP:SYNTH 2370:Lazt9312 2260:Lazt9312 2211:Lazt9312 2156:Lazt9312 2128:Lazt9312 2038:Lazt9312 2027:faction. 1993:Lazt9312 1979:Lazt9312 1961:Lazt9312 1932:Lazt9312 1859:Lazt9312 1841:Lazt9312 1808:Lazt9312 1792:Lazt9312 1764:Lazt9312 1744:sources. 1713:Lazt9312 1470:Jeff6045 1443:contribs 1428:far-left 1390:Jeff6045 1332:Jeff6045 1295:Jeff6045 1252:Jeff6045 1227:Jeff6045 1203:Jeff6045 1104:Jeff6045 1032:Jeff6045 999:Jeff6045 984:Jeff6045 929:Jeff6045 843:Jeff6045 841:policy. 750:Jeff6045 735:Jeff6045 696:Jeff6045 663:Jeff6045 611:Jeff6045 361:Relisted 242:Politics 233:politics 189:Politics 2368:Hello @ 1670:Jiandao 1424:Marxist 1233:WP: SYN 731:WP:NPOV 423:Support 408:Jenks24 365:Jenks24 346:Minjung 320:Jenks24 269:on the 144:on the 2224:NPOV. 1873:centre 1676:Japan. 1199:WP:SYN 1138:WP:SYN 909:WP:NOR 905:WP:SYN 839:WP:SYN 817:WP:NOR 727:WP:COV 603:WP:NOR 599:WP:VER 47:scale. 2372:and @ 1674:hated 1563:WP:OR 1408:least 1311:from 1289:from 923:, or 723:WP:DR 385:Garam 352:Garam 348:Party 316:moved 117:Korea 99:Korea 70:Korea 2429:talk 2415:talk 2396:talk 2264:talk 2250:talk 2230:talk 2215:talk 2201:talk 2187:and 2174:talk 2160:talk 2146:talk 2132:talk 2111:talk 2091:talk 2057:talk 2042:talk 2012:talk 1997:talk 1983:talk 1965:talk 1950:talk 1936:talk 1922:talk 1903:talk 1885:talk 1863:talk 1845:talk 1830:talk 1812:talk 1796:talk 1782:talk 1768:talk 1732:talk 1717:talk 1691:talk 1648:talk 1640:here 1624:talk 1609:talk 1585:talk 1581:삭은사과 1571:talk 1567:삭은사과 1561:See 1545:talk 1522:talk 1496:talk 1481:talk 1459:talk 1439:talk 1405:very 1394:talk 1356:talk 1342:talk 1321:talk 1299:talk 1263:talk 1241:talk 1207:talk 1193:El C 1175:talk 1161:talk 1146:talk 1114:talk 1084:talk 1021:talk 988:talk 963:talk 948:talk 933:talk 876:talk 861:talk 847:talk 825:talk 821:삭은사과 819:.)-- 806:talk 800:) -- 780:talk 763:Logo 754:talk 739:talk 729:and 706:talk 674:talk 652:talk 630:talk 615:talk 601:and 570:talk 555:talk 551:삭은사과 536:talk 463:talk 427:WP:V 425:per 412:talk 389:talk 369:talk 356:talk 324:talk 2281:Yue 2071:Yue 1877:far 479:. 261:Low 136:Low 2446:: 2431:) 2417:) 2398:) 2363:: 2286:🌙 2276:. 2266:) 2252:) 2232:) 2217:) 2203:) 2176:) 2162:) 2148:) 2134:) 2113:) 2093:) 2076:🌙 2059:) 2044:) 2014:) 1999:) 1985:) 1967:) 1952:) 1938:) 1924:) 1905:) 1887:) 1865:) 1847:) 1832:) 1824:. 1814:) 1798:) 1784:) 1770:) 1734:) 1719:) 1693:) 1650:) 1626:) 1618:-- 1611:) 1587:) 1573:) 1547:) 1524:) 1498:) 1483:) 1475:-- 1461:) 1441:/ 1396:) 1358:) 1344:) 1323:) 1301:) 1265:) 1257:-- 1243:) 1209:) 1177:) 1163:) 1148:) 1116:) 1086:) 1057:무상 1049:무상 1023:) 990:) 965:) 957:-- 950:) 942:-- 935:) 919:, 878:) 870:-- 863:) 849:) 827:) 808:) 782:) 756:) 741:) 733:. 708:) 676:) 668:-- 654:) 642:, 632:) 624:-- 617:) 572:) 557:) 538:) 465:) 414:) 391:) 371:) 363:. 337:→ 326:) 318:. 299:. 2427:( 2413:( 2394:( 2262:( 2248:( 2228:( 2213:( 2199:( 2172:( 2158:( 2144:( 2130:( 2109:( 2089:( 2055:( 2040:( 2010:( 1995:( 1981:( 1963:( 1948:( 1934:( 1920:( 1901:( 1883:( 1861:( 1843:( 1828:( 1810:( 1794:( 1780:( 1766:( 1730:( 1715:( 1689:( 1646:( 1622:( 1607:( 1583:( 1569:( 1543:( 1520:( 1494:( 1479:( 1472:: 1468:@ 1457:( 1445:) 1437:( 1392:( 1354:( 1340:( 1334:: 1330:@ 1319:( 1297:( 1261:( 1254:: 1250:@ 1239:( 1229:: 1225:@ 1205:( 1195:: 1191:@ 1173:( 1159:( 1144:( 1112:( 1106:: 1102:@ 1082:( 1034:: 1030:@ 1019:( 1001:: 997:@ 986:( 980:: 976:@ 961:( 946:( 931:( 901:: 897:@ 874:( 859:( 845:( 823:( 804:( 778:( 752:( 737:( 719:: 715:@ 704:( 698:: 694:@ 672:( 665:: 661:@ 650:( 644:2 640:1 628:( 613:( 595:: 591:@ 568:( 553:( 534:( 461:( 410:( 387:( 367:( 354:( 322:( 273:. 168:. 148:. 114:. 53:: 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index