1147:
sampling are from very specific dates, which are only visible to a reader who follows the footnotes. After all, the whole point of an impaired stream is that it wasn't always this way; water quality changes and the measurements are not absolute or permanent. I think the reader would be better served by text that went something like this: "A series of USGS analyses in the late 1960s found that ... (and then give the data) ... A 2011 review of the watershed by the
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection found that every stream in the Mud Creek watershed failed to meet the water quality standards for its intended use ..." and then add the relevant information after that, if possible highlighting in prose the items that indicate unfitness for use. Using this data as if it were general undated facts about the creek seems wrong to me.
244:
223:
139:
118:
1045:
However, I did notice a couple bumps/mistakes along the way. I did notice that there was a couple wikilinks that were red, meaning that they led to pages that weren't exactly there. There are currently 5 red links. They are links to: Organic
Enrichment, Trimmers Rock Foundation, Onondaga and Old Port Foundations, Soil Association, and the John Gosse Freeze links. I believe that if you fix these, I see no reason why we shouldn't promote this to GA status.
149:
32:
87:
343:
537:"It then exits Madison Township. Upon exiting Madison Township": Suggest merging these paragraphs and eliminating the duplicate phrase. I also think you should eliminate the single-sentence paragraphs (both in this section and throughout the article); and there's no need for a separate section just to say that all the tributaries are unnamed.
254:
1068:
I fixed
Onondaga and Old Port Formation, organic enrichment, and soil association. Trimmers Rock Formation should stay since all the other rock formations are linked and someone might write an article on it at some point. Since you bring it up, I suppose I could write an article on Mr. Freeze at some
1212:
The "as of" dates are a big help. Can you do something similar in the lead where you reference that data? I changed the tense in several places to past, because this is data that's going to change over time. Can you do the same for the description of land use, which should also be as of 2011? Re
1150:
I see why you want to keep the references to
Whitmoyer and Freeze but I'm not convinced the information is phrased in a way that meets your goals. How about: "An early settler in the area was George Whitmoyer, who built a cabin in the valley of Mud Creek at Jerseytown in 1772"? That makes it clear
751:
Generally I'm concerned that the article does not read at all smoothly; it reads like an assemblage of facts, not like a coherent description of the creek and its environment. The article needs to be copyedited throughout for concision and smoothness. For example:"Four were built in the 1930s, one
723:
Much of what's in the hydrology section appears to be taken from the tables in the source; I think it would be better to leave it in table form. In running prose it reads very awkwardly, and it makes a very poor reference for the reader. Also, given that the data all comes from a particular study,
1093:
says "Do not remove red links unless you are certain that
Knowledge should not have an article on that subject", though it adds that generally redlinks to people's names should be avoided because of the risk of incorrect links to people with similar names. I think you could safely re-add all those
485:
I'd get rid of most of the digits in the numbers -- I know the source gives this precision, but it's unrealistic, and it would be better to just say "about" and use only a believable precision. For example, there's no way that the daily load of phosphorus is constant to within 1%, which would be a
884:
Whitmoyer was the first (or at least one of the first) settler(s) in the watershed, hence the mention. I've always considered that information valuable when it can be found and anyway, he's notable enough to have significant coverage. The part about John Gosse Freeze is more to show that the creek
951:
Well, I'd be willing to give you feedback as you work on it, and if it gets to the point where I think it's GA-worthy, you can renominate it and I will review it. Would that work for you? If you find you don't agree with my comments, you could always just renominate it anyway. And if you would
849:
Are you confident that the 1883 reference for the type of sandstone has not been superseded by later geological names? The TMDL reference briefly discusses the geology but doesn't mention "Oriskany cherty sandstone", and as far as I can tell from some googling the modern name is just "Oriskany
456:
Well, it's in the infobox. I'm not going to fail GA because of a citation in the lead, but the usual style would be to cite it in the infobox and not the lead. I think it should be in the body too, though -- your first paragraph treats the lead as an introduction, so it begins to go into more
1044:
I'll help with the review. Upon quick reading this article, it appears that there are really no mistakes in this article and I do not see any reasons for not promoting this article to GA status. Anyone who wanted to find out more about Mud Creek could read this article and learn more about it.
1146:
Overall this is much improved. I'm still somewhat concerned about the way the prose essentially recites data from tables, though I understand that GA's prose requirements are not as high as FA, so that might be OK. But I'm more concerned about the fact that some of the sources for the water
974:
WP:RGA does say that "If you fail an article and then discover that the editors appear willing to make significant improvements, it is possible to re-open the review", but if you would prefer I can just fix the issues, renominate, and ping you to do a second review.
724:
I think the date needs to be given. Currently the article just gives the data without qualification; this would be undesirable in any case, but given that the streams are impaired it should be clear to the reader that this is current, or at least recent data.
620:
Stating the load of sediment and phosphorus in the lead is not the same as saying it's impaired; a reader will probably not know how much phosphorus should be in the load. I would avoid using "impaired" without an explanation, too; it's a bit jargony for an
1158:, the name "Mud Creek" does not appear; instead Freeze refers to the creek as the east branch of Chillisquaque Creek." As above I think this is marginal but I'm willing to leave it in. I think the rephrasing would help make it clearer why you mention it.
904:
I'm sorry to do this, since this article has been waiting a long time for a review, but I'm afraid this is not close to GA standard at the moment, so I'm going to fail it. The prose is not clear and concise and the article is not well-organized.
486:
couple of ounces; quoting it to an accuracy of 100 micrograms isn't helpful to the reader. I'd put in only as many digits as seem to be reasonable. Some numbers, such as averages, can be more precise, but even there I'd eliminate some digits.
752:
was built in the 1940s (1946), two were built in the 1960s (in 1962), and one was built in the 1980s (in 1984)" could be much more concise: "Four were built in the 1930s, one in 1946, two in 1962, and the most recent in 1984."
348:
1191:
I've added the years that the data comes from into the prose and also rewrote the sentence about
Whitmoyer as you suggested. As for the bit about Freeze, the name "Mud Creek" does actually appear. Freeze says the following:
1013:
Ritchie33 just reopened this GAN for me, so we should be back in business once
Legobot makes a pass. Let me know when you're ready for me to take another look, or if you have any questions about my review.
1217:, but adds that the creek's name is more correctly the East Branch of the Chillisquaque"? I wasn't clear from the wording you have now that Freeze actually used the name "Mud Creek" in his book.
935:
Please reconsider your quickfail. I have the time to fix this and I'm willing to put in the work. I can't guarantee that I can fix everything, but I'm sure I can at least get close. Thanks, --
353:
759:
I've done some light copyediting, including fixing the example you gave. I think the prose is mostly okay, but I haven't yet looked at the hydrology section. I'll do that tomorrow. --
64:
381:
1345:
1341:
1327:
1422:
205:
195:
371:
43:
1412:
672:
Where does it say in the given source that the entirety of every stream in the watershed is impaired? I couldn't find that, but I may just have missed it.
1273:
440:
The length of the creek actually isn't repeated. It's critical information for the article, but I don't know where it would go outside of the lead. --
493:
I've trimmed it to two digits after the decimal point (except for one value, which was 0.0002 and would thus look like 0 if I removed any digits). --
399:
1417:
310:
171:
1289:
1432:
300:
1313:
1255:
1230:
1174:
1107:
1027:
1004:
965:
918:
708:
657:
605:
522:
470:
1251:
1226:
1170:
1103:
1023:
1000:
961:
914:
877:
I doubt that George
Whitmoyer is notable enough to be worth mentioning, and I think the same is true of the John Gosse Freeze reference.
704:
653:
601:
518:
466:
420:
57:
857:
I doubt that the geology could do any major change in 130 years. I changed
Oriskany cherty sandstone to Oriskany sandstone, though. --
162:
123:
1323:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
276:
1427:
1407:
376:
49:
885:
has an alternate name, rather than when Freeze thinks. Shouldn't alternate names given by reliable sources be mentioned? --
1213:
Freeze, how about "John Gosse Freeze gives the name Mud Creek as the east branch of
Chillisquaque Creek in his 1888 book
1388:
267:
228:
98:
457:
detail, but the lead should also be a summary, with the body giving all the information in the lead, with more detail.
731:
In past GAs I've written, that info has been in prose form. I'll see what can be done about improving the writing. --
560:
I'll add some more information on the tributaries tomorrow; I can figure out their lengths from The National Map.--
1344:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1290:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140201121145/http://www.usgwarchives.org/maps/pa/county/columb/usgs/madison.jpg
1379:
1281:
1247:
1222:
1166:
1099:
1019:
996:
957:
910:
700:
649:
597:
514:
462:
414:
1393:
1314:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140714133433/http://www.columbiaccd.org/2013_Chesapeake_Bay_Trib_Strategy.pdf
1259:
1234:
1207:
1178:
1134:
1111:
1080:
1056:
1031:
1008:
986:
969:
946:
922:
896:
868:
840:
813:
786:
770:
742:
712:
690:
661:
639:
609:
587:
571:
555:
526:
504:
474:
451:
424:
1277:
395:
31:
1363:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1351:
104:
1280:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
243:
222:
1293:
1051:
1307:
17:
1317:
154:
275:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
170:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1301:
1243:
1218:
1186:
1162:
1118:
1095:
1015:
992:
953:
930:
906:
696:
645:
593:
510:
458:
410:
1348:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
433:
There's no need for the citation in the lead; the information is repeated and cited in the body.
138:
117:
1364:
509:
OK on the 0.0002. I think I'd have eliminated more digits, but this looks more sensible now.
1090:
53:
259:
1371:
1202:
1129:
1086:
1075:
1063:
1046:
981:
941:
891:
863:
835:
808:
781:
765:
737:
685:
634:
582:
576:
Actually, never mind that. I merged the tributaries section with the watershed section. --
566:
550:
499:
446:
1330:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1370:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1401:
1151:
the reason for mentioning him. I'm not convinced this is notable but it's arguable.
1123:
Good point. I added back the redlinks to organic enrichment and soil association. --
167:
1193:
991:
OK - I'll reopen it. How do I do that - just reinstate the nomination template?
1337:
1336:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1198:
1194:
Mud Creek, which is in fact properly, the East Branch of the Chillisquaque..."
1125:
1071:
977:
937:
887:
859:
831:
804:
777:
761:
733:
681:
630:
578:
562:
546:
495:
442:
249:
144:
402:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
1161:
Let me know what you think about the above and I'll take another look.
1215:
A History of Columbia County, Pennsylvania: From the Earliest Times
1156:
A History of Columbia County, Pennsylvania: From the Earliest Times
1294:
http://www.usgwarchives.org/maps/pa/county/columb/usgs/madison.jpg
952:
like another opinion now, we can ask for one on the GA talk page.
272:
1308:
http://www.usgwarchives.org/maps/pa/county/montour/usgs/derry.jpg
1318:
http://www.columbiaccd.org/2013_Chesapeake_Bay_Trib_Strategy.pdf
1094:
redlinks unless you feel they won't ever be separate articles.
1069:
point in the not-too-distant future and turn that link blue. --
80:
26:
1284:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1154:
For Freeze, how about: "In John Gosse Freeze's 1888 book
70:
822:
Reference 6 displays a syntax error in the footnotes.
795:
The external links checker tool finds one dead link.
271:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
166:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1340:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1242:Everything now looks good, so I'm passing this.
56:. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
1326:This message was posted before February 2018.
8:
802:I added an archive.org link to the ref. --
331:
217:
112:
1274:Mud Creek (Chillisquaque Creek tributary)
1272:I have just modified 2 external links on
38:Mud Creek (Chillisquaque Creek tributary)
400:Talk:Mud Creek (Chillisquaque Creek)/GA1
1265:External links modified (February 2018)
644:I tweaked this to avoid the bare link.
362:
334:
219:
114:
775:I copyedited the hydrology section. --
628:I added a note defining "impaired". --
7:
1423:Low-importance Pennsylvania articles
265:This article is within the scope of
160:This article is within the scope of
86:
84:
18:Talk:Mud Creek (Chillisquaque Creek)
592:Much better. I did a little more.
103:It is of interest to the following
1413:Geography and places good articles
180:Knowledge:WikiProject Pennsylvania
44:Geography and places good articles
25:
1276:. Please take a moment to review
183:Template:WikiProject Pennsylvania
52:. If you can improve it further,
252:
242:
221:
147:
137:
116:
85:
30:
305:This article has been rated as
200:This article has been rated as
1418:GA-Class Pennsylvania articles
40:has been listed as one of the
1:
1433:Low-importance River articles
279:and see a list of open tasks.
174:and see a list of open tasks.
1394:15:44, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
1260:15:20, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
1235:12:45, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
1208:00:13, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
1179:14:12, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
1135:13:20, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
1112:13:05, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
1081:17:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
1057:03:16, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
1032:12:00, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
1009:03:27, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
987:03:16, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
970:03:10, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
947:03:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
923:02:17, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
897:15:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
869:15:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
841:15:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
814:15:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
787:16:03, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
771:02:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
743:15:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
713:13:05, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
691:15:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
662:13:05, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
640:15:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
610:12:55, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
588:16:03, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
572:02:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
556:15:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
527:12:55, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
505:15:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
475:12:55, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
452:15:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
425:01:17, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
285:Knowledge:WikiProject Rivers
288:Template:WikiProject Rivers
1449:
1357:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1269:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
311:project's importance scale
206:project's importance scale
1085:Re the redlinks, I think
304:
237:
199:
132:
111:
163:WikiProject Pennsylvania
1428:GA-Class River articles
1408:Knowledge good articles
93:This article is rated
544:Paragraphs merged. --
186:Pennsylvania articles
68:: January 25, 2015. (
50:good article criteria
1338:regular verification
1328:After February 2018
155:Pennsylvania portal
1382:InternetArchiveBot
1333:InternetArchiveBot
679:Map on page 24. --
268:WikiProject Rivers
99:content assessment
1358:
390:
389:
325:
324:
321:
320:
317:
316:
216:
215:
212:
211:
79:
78:
75:
16:(Redirected from
1440:
1392:
1383:
1356:
1355:
1334:
1305:
1195:
1190:
1122:
1067:
1049:
934:
344:Copyvio detector
332:
293:
292:
289:
286:
283:
262:
260:Geography portal
257:
256:
255:
246:
239:
238:
233:
225:
218:
188:
187:
184:
181:
178:
157:
152:
151:
150:
141:
134:
133:
128:
120:
113:
96:
90:
89:
88:
81:
73:
71:Reviewed version
62:
34:
27:
21:
1448:
1447:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1398:
1397:
1386:
1381:
1349:
1342:have permission
1332:
1299:
1282:this simple FaQ
1267:
1184:
1116:
1089:is mistaken --
1061:
1055:
1047:
928:
394:This review is
386:
358:
330:
290:
287:
284:
281:
280:
258:
253:
251:
231:
185:
182:
179:
176:
175:
153:
148:
146:
126:
97:on Knowledge's
94:
69:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1446:
1444:
1436:
1435:
1430:
1425:
1420:
1415:
1410:
1400:
1399:
1376:
1375:
1368:
1321:
1320:
1312:Added archive
1310:
1296:
1288:Added archive
1266:
1263:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1053:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
902:
901:
900:
899:
879:
878:
874:
873:
872:
871:
852:
851:
846:
845:
844:
843:
824:
823:
819:
818:
817:
816:
797:
796:
792:
791:
790:
789:
773:
754:
753:
748:
747:
746:
745:
726:
725:
720:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
674:
673:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
623:
622:
617:
616:
615:
614:
613:
612:
574:
558:
539:
538:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
488:
487:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
435:
434:
429:
405:
404:
388:
387:
385:
384:
379:
374:
368:
365:
364:
360:
359:
357:
356:
354:External links
351:
346:
340:
337:
336:
329:
326:
323:
322:
319:
318:
315:
314:
307:Low-importance
303:
297:
296:
294:
291:River articles
277:the discussion
264:
263:
247:
235:
234:
232:Low‑importance
226:
214:
213:
210:
209:
202:Low-importance
198:
192:
191:
189:
172:the discussion
159:
158:
142:
130:
129:
127:Low‑importance
121:
109:
108:
102:
91:
77:
76:
61:
35:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1445:
1434:
1431:
1429:
1426:
1424:
1421:
1419:
1416:
1414:
1411:
1409:
1406:
1405:
1403:
1396:
1395:
1390:
1385:
1384:
1373:
1369:
1366:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1353:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1329:
1324:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1309:
1303:
1297:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1270:
1264:
1262:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1244:Mike Christie
1236:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1219:Mike Christie
1216:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1206:
1204:
1200:
1188:
1187:Mike Christie
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1163:Mike Christie
1159:
1157:
1152:
1148:
1136:
1133:
1131:
1127:
1120:
1119:Mike Christie
1115:
1114:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1096:Mike Christie
1092:
1088:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1079:
1077:
1073:
1065:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1052:
1050:
1043:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1016:Mike Christie
1012:
1011:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
994:
993:Mike Christie
990:
989:
988:
985:
983:
979:
973:
972:
971:
967:
963:
959:
955:
954:Mike Christie
950:
949:
948:
945:
943:
939:
932:
931:Mike Christie
927:
926:
925:
924:
920:
916:
912:
908:
907:Mike Christie
898:
895:
893:
889:
883:
882:
881:
880:
876:
875:
870:
867:
865:
861:
856:
855:
854:
853:
848:
847:
842:
839:
837:
833:
828:
827:
826:
825:
821:
820:
815:
812:
810:
806:
801:
800:
799:
798:
794:
793:
788:
785:
783:
779:
774:
772:
769:
767:
763:
758:
757:
756:
755:
750:
749:
744:
741:
739:
735:
730:
729:
728:
727:
722:
721:
714:
710:
706:
702:
698:
697:Mike Christie
694:
693:
692:
689:
687:
683:
678:
677:
676:
675:
671:
670:
663:
659:
655:
651:
647:
646:Mike Christie
643:
642:
641:
638:
636:
632:
627:
626:
625:
624:
621:encyclopedia.
619:
618:
611:
607:
603:
599:
595:
594:Mike Christie
591:
590:
589:
586:
584:
580:
575:
573:
570:
568:
564:
559:
557:
554:
552:
548:
543:
542:
541:
540:
536:
535:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
511:Mike Christie
508:
507:
506:
503:
501:
497:
492:
491:
490:
489:
484:
483:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
459:Mike Christie
455:
454:
453:
450:
448:
444:
439:
438:
437:
436:
432:
431:
430:
427:
426:
422:
419:
416:
412:
411:Mike Christie
409:
403:
401:
397:
392:
391:
383:
380:
378:
375:
373:
370:
369:
367:
366:
361:
355:
352:
350:
347:
345:
342:
341:
339:
338:
333:
327:
312:
308:
302:
299:
298:
295:
278:
274:
270:
269:
261:
250:
248:
245:
241:
240:
236:
230:
227:
224:
220:
207:
203:
197:
194:
193:
190:
173:
169:
165:
164:
156:
145:
143:
140:
136:
135:
131:
125:
122:
119:
115:
110:
106:
100:
92:
83:
82:
72:
67:
66:
59:
55:
51:
47:
46:
45:
39:
36:
33:
29:
28:
19:
1380:
1377:
1352:source check
1331:
1325:
1322:
1271:
1268:
1241:
1214:
1197:
1160:
1155:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1124:
1070:
976:
936:
903:
886:
858:
830:
829:Repaired. --
803:
776:
760:
732:
680:
629:
577:
561:
545:
494:
441:
428:
417:
407:
406:
393:
382:Instructions
306:
266:
201:
177:Pennsylvania
168:Pennsylvania
161:
124:Pennsylvania
105:WikiProjects
63:
54:please do so
42:
41:
37:
850:sandstone".
396:transcluded
1402:Categories
1389:Report bug
1091:WP:REDLINK
1087:Yoshi24517
1064:Yoshi24517
1048:Yoshi24517
349:Authorship
335:GA toolbox
48:under the
1372:this tool
1365:this tool
1302:dead link
408:Reviewer:
372:Templates
363:Reviewing
328:GA Review
1378:Cheers.—
1252:contribs
1227:contribs
1171:contribs
1104:contribs
1024:contribs
1001:contribs
962:contribs
915:contribs
705:contribs
654:contribs
602:contribs
519:contribs
467:contribs
421:contribs
377:Criteria
95:GA-class
58:reassess
1306:tag to
1278:my edit
1256:library
1231:library
1175:library
1108:library
1028:library
1005:library
966:library
919:library
709:library
658:library
606:library
523:library
471:library
309:on the
204:on the
1298:Added
1054:Absent
282:Rivers
273:Rivers
229:Rivers
101:scale.
65:Review
1199:Jakob
1126:Jakob
1072:Jakob
978:Jakob
938:Jakob
888:Jakob
860:Jakob
832:Jakob
805:Jakob
778:Jakob
762:Jakob
734:Jakob
682:Jakob
631:Jakob
579:Jakob
563:Jakob
547:Jakob
496:Jakob
443:Jakob
398:from
1248:talk
1223:talk
1203:talk
1196:. --
1167:talk
1130:talk
1100:talk
1076:talk
1020:talk
997:talk
982:talk
958:talk
942:talk
911:talk
892:talk
864:talk
836:talk
809:talk
782:talk
766:talk
738:talk
701:talk
695:OK.
686:talk
650:talk
635:talk
598:talk
583:talk
567:talk
551:talk
515:talk
500:talk
463:talk
447:talk
415:talk
1346:RfC
1316:to
1292:to
1254:-
1229:-
1173:-
1106:-
1026:-
1003:-
964:-
917:-
707:-
656:-
604:-
521:-
469:-
301:Low
196:Low
60:it.
1404::
1359:.
1354:}}
1350:{{
1304:}}
1300:{{
1258:)
1250:-
1233:)
1225:-
1205:)
1177:)
1169:-
1132:)
1110:)
1102:-
1078:)
1030:)
1022:-
1007:)
999:-
984:)
975:--
968:)
960:-
944:)
921:)
913:-
894:)
866:)
838:)
811:)
784:)
768:)
740:)
711:)
703:-
688:)
660:)
652:-
637:)
608:)
600:-
585:)
569:)
553:)
525:)
517:-
502:)
473:)
465:-
449:)
423:)
74:).
1391:)
1387:(
1374:.
1367:.
1246:(
1221:(
1201:(
1189::
1185:@
1165:(
1128:(
1121::
1117:@
1098:(
1074:(
1066::
1062:@
1018:(
995:(
980:(
956:(
940:(
933::
929:@
909:(
890:(
862:(
834:(
807:(
780:(
764:(
736:(
699:(
684:(
648:(
633:(
596:(
581:(
565:(
549:(
513:(
498:(
461:(
445:(
418:·
413:(
313:.
208:.
107::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
