42:
515:
490:
450:
424:
400:
354:
317:
542:
380:
334:
293:
258:
222:
634:
617:
592:
520:
good. One request, can you give some context for the photos in the captions (of the victims, the others are good), if the sources give them? any indication as to when the photos are from? it's fine if the sources don't give this information but it would be nice
559:
relative to the size of the article I think the lead is slightly too long. some of the details contained in the lead are, imo, unnecessary for the lead and should only be in the body. maybe trim it to only the more pertinent details?
47:
568:
one thing that should be in the lead is, imo, stuff about the response to it beyond just proceedings, since the response to a murder is usually one of the things that make it notable and a key part of the event
126:
122:
107:
52:
99:
314:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
311:
248:
115:
80:
17:
70:
480:
92:
252:
244:
236:
156:
200:
240:
178:
75:
328:
576:". I've added those to the lead, but I suspect there's more to be added to the body here (which I will try to do later)
484:
303:
196:
182:
160:
505:
307:
232:
150:
495:
it is unusual for there to be NFCC photos of both murder victims, but the licenses are appropriate and it's not
472:
476:
394:
271:
572:
the body doesn't really have that much response, just "some ppl held a vigil" and "some politicians 'cared
390:
374:
348:
344:
192:
172:
146:
524:
hmm, I've added that the pic of Holley was a selfie, but I couldn't find anything to add to
Johnson
509:
444:
286:
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
464:
359:
all sources are online and earwig shows no issues besides long proper names and quotes, pass
280:
204:
188:
168:
421:
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
414:
287:
603:
if you're going to have a verdict in the infobox you should also state the charges
219:
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
628:
this is very pedantic but citation 4 is the only one without an archive
443:
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
606:
body doesn't list all the charges, will add that then do this
579:
done and done, although I fear the lead is far too long now
134:
103:
18:Talk:Murders of Keona Holley and Justin Johnson
8:
429:neutral, no detectable POV, reflects sources
555:First thoughts, will do deeper check later
393:without going into unnecessary detail (see
187:Hi! I'll review this. Might take me a bit.
30:
61:
33:
322:all sources reliable and cited inline
7:
499:, so pass. the free images look good
405:no unnecessary detail, seems focused
462:Is it illustrated, if possible, by
24:
632:
615:
590:
540:
513:
488:
448:
422:
398:
378:
352:
332:
315:
291:
256:
220:
541:
379:
333:
292:
257:
221:
312:could reasonably be challenged
197:05:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
183:05:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
161:01:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
1:
481:valid non-free use rationales
514:
489:
449:
423:
399:
353:
316:
657:
288:the layout style guideline
586:date is wrong on cite 16
231:B. It complies with the
611:citation 9 has no date
508:to the topic, and have
368:broad in its coverage
447:or content dispute:
391:focused on the topic
373:A. It addresses the
345:copyright violations
329:no original research
277:no original research
310:. All content that
343:D. It contains no
253:list incorporation
510:suitable captions
483:are provided for
281:source spot-check
89:
88:
648:
640:
636:
635:
623:
619:
618:
598:
594:
593:
575:
563:tried to do this
544:
543:
517:
516:
492:
491:
485:non-free content
477:copyright status
452:
451:
426:
425:
402:
401:
382:
381:
356:
355:
336:
335:
319:
318:
304:Reliable sources
295:
294:
279:, as shown by a
260:
259:
224:
223:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
656:
655:
651:
650:
649:
647:
646:
645:
633:
631:
616:
614:
591:
589:
573:
327:C. It contains
235:guidelines for
233:manual of style
147:Queen of Hearts
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
654:
652:
644:
643:
642:
641:
626:
625:
624:
609:
608:
607:
601:
600:
599:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
566:
565:
564:
554:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
539:Pass or Fail:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
504:B. Images are
502:
501:
500:
471:A. Images are
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
387:
386:
385:
377:of the topic:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
341:
340:
339:
325:
324:
323:
300:
299:
298:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
245:words to watch
229:
228:
227:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
653:
639:
630:
629:
627:
622:
613:
612:
610:
605:
604:
602:
597:
588:
587:
585:
578:
577:
571:
570:
567:
562:
561:
558:
557:
556:
546:
545:
538:
537:
535:
532:
523:
522:
519:
518:
511:
507:
503:
498:
494:
493:
486:
482:
478:
474:
470:
469:
467:
466:
461:
454:
453:
446:
442:
441:
439:
435:
428:
427:
420:
419:
417:
416:
411:
404:
403:
396:
395:summary style
392:
388:
384:
383:
376:
372:
371:
369:
365:
358:
357:
350:
346:
342:
338:
337:
330:
326:
321:
320:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
296:
289:
285:
284:
282:
278:
274:
273:
268:
262:
261:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
237:lead sections
234:
230:
226:
225:
218:
217:
215:
211:
210:
209:
208:
206:
203:review – see
202:
198:
194:
190:
185:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
167:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
637:
620:
595:
553:
533:
496:
463:
437:
413:
389:B. It stays
375:main aspects
367:
308:cited inline
276:
270:
214:well written
213:
207:for criteria
199:
186:
175:
165:
164:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
475:with their
104:visual edit
349:plagiarism
272:verifiable
189:PARAKANYAA
169:PARAKANYAA
144:Nominator:
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
166:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
506:relevant
445:edit war
205:WP:WIAGA
179:contribs
157:contribs
76:Criteria
534:Overall
415:neutral
249:fiction
127:history
108:history
94:Article
479:, and
473:tagged
465:images
438:stable
436:Is it
412:Is it
366:Is it
269:Is it
251:, and
241:layout
212:Is it
497:wrong
275:with
136:Watch
16:<
638:Done
621:Done
596:Done
455:good
347:nor
306:are
193:talk
173:talk
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
397:):
302:B.
536::
512::
487::
468:?
440:?
418:?
370:?
351::
331::
290::
283:?
255::
247:,
243:,
239:,
216:?
201:GA
195:)
181:)
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
574:'
191:(
176:·
171:(
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.