Talk:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk/Archive 4

3219:

uncivilized as these bunch of Slavs. The point of discussion here is to move this article not to debate on the personality of greatest man of the 20th century upon biased fand falsified claims. If you are to call someone murderer, call entire ancestry of greeks murderers, call them savages. Those greeks invaded our homeland, raped Turkish women, killed everything on their way even infants and pregnant women whlie invading as well as while fleeing from the might of Turkish soldiers rightfully defending their homeland in the lead of Atatürk, and now HE is the murderer; is it so? Of course it is teached like this to all greeks;the fact is that they're all brainwashed with false history from the infancy. They're not taught the brutalities they've caused during the invasion of Anatolia, they're not taught the inhumanities they've committed on the Turkish Cypriots before 1974, they were not taught that Alexander who was actually a Macedonian (not greek) as well as being homosexual, they were not taught the destruction they've made on the Ottoman monuments in greece, they're not taught that the captured general of greek invading forces, Trikopis, was treated like a guest by Atatürk rather than an animal until he returned back to greece. If any one thinks that Atatürk was a murderer my POV is that he/she is a complete idiot. What he did was to free Anatolia from warmongering savages came to Anatlia to destroy the Turkish nation. Go spread your poisoned greek propaganda elsewhere.

439:

on his own people with a strictness similar to the totalitarians that would rise ten years later." He was faced with a situation similer to that of the conflict in Iraq now. The Americans seek to insert a democratic, equal government, but various obsticles such as an un-even distribution of power between groups such as the Shiite and the Sunnis keep the government in a state of turmoil. Durring this power struggle to gain control of the country, general unrest tears up the land. Ataturk saw this situation in turkey, and used his popular support to prevent it from happening. He could not have immidiatly instigated a democratic government on the turkish people, firstly because the people were not ready to handle it, and second, because while the power struggle to gain a majority in a new democracy was going on, opposition groups (such as the group lead by Enver Pasa) would see that moment of unrest, and act, forcing the country into an internal power struggle that would have left turkey weak to outside forces, and , it those opposition groups did manage to gain control, there was the possibly that they would put in a harsher dictatorship than the one that Ataturk ran. I in no way deny the fact that he was a ruthless dictaor (but only to a point to make sure that turkey survived), but instead I want to point out to those hampered in the skill of observation that Ataturk might not have had a choice to turn the government into a dictatorship. -Versipellis Rex

291:

under which Kemal came to power. You are wrong that there was no authority in Turkey. It was in fact ruled by the sultan, although he had become little more than a puppet of the two great European powers, Great Britain and France. At the time, those two powers were blatently encouraging a newly imperialistic Greece to invade Turkey, which it did. Kemal rose to power because he defied the orders of the sultan and fought the invaders. This was fine. In fact, it was admirable, eventually winning him the support from the very man he had defied, the sultan. Nevertheless, after he finished negotiating the Treaty of Lausanne, he immediately set out to clamp down on his own people with a strictness similar to the totalitarians that would rise ten years later. The fact is that your assertion that this was necessary to control his country is false. He had nearly total popular support, and only the Muslim fanatics and ethnic minorities resented him. No, his dictatorial measures were aimed at increasing Turkey's (and therefore his own) power by any means necessary, even if it meant crushing ethnic minorities, forcing his country to change its very culture, and stamping out any hope of democracy.

307:

every aspect of the government, military, and society in order to increase the power of the state. I agree that Turkey could not jump straight to a democratic society, but there was a more moderate way to go about this. If he was really serious about promoting democracy, he would not have disposed of the sultan, and instituted a constitutional monarchy, which has been shown time and time again to be the best path to democracy. No, Ataturk was more concerned about his own power. Also, you mention bringing Turkey to "western civilisational standards." Why would he want to do this? Especially in the aftermath of World War One, it was increasingly difficult to argue that Europe was an enlightened society that would be ideal to emulate. Instead, one must conclude that he was only forcing change in his society in order to make Turkey more powerfull.

3424:

the Ottoman Empire conquered the "Macedonia" and "Thessaly". "Sarıgöl sub-district", where was at the west of "Vodina sanjak", were 16 Turkish villages which were compeletly existed by Turkmens. Zübeyde Hanım's father "Fethullah Ağa", who was from "Sofu - Zade" family, had flee from "Sarıgöl" to "Lanzaka" where was near of Selanik and purchased a farm there at the top of 1800's. Zübeyde Hanım was born in here in 1857. Zübeyde Hanım's grandfather "Feyzullah Efendi's" big uncle had gone back to Konya again and joined to "Mevlevi Denomination". Family name of Zübeyde Hanım's family were saved as "Konyarlar" to Ottoman municipality and they were called with that name becasue they were from "Konya". One of the farms of Atatürk was "Sarıtay" farm in "Kızıllar" village where is 41 km far away from "Taşkale" where the family of Atatürk's mother emigrated.

1302:

since they're all going to be directed to the same page. Furthermore if one doesn't understand it's only one person he should understand it eventually after reading the article. If one doesn't make the distinction after all the articles are linked to a single page and even after reading just the first paragraph of the article he or she is clearly an idiot. In short it's not important how people understand, the important thing is the real information and people learning it. It's not that hard to do, is it? RESPECT HIS REAL NAME, he is called as Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, no matter who is reading the article. He is even called so in the article. Apart from that, I left no blank pages since all relevant articles are directed to a single one. There's no single link broken or any page left blank. All are directed to the same article. Clear?

347:

theocracy which characterised the Ottoman empire had held back the technological and economical developments which had allowed the Western nations to surge ahead. When the Sultan agreed to partition Turkey among Western powers do you think Ataturk would allow him to carry on in office once he liberated the country? Ataturk was a Republican, he belived in rationalism and the enlightenment, everything the Sultan stood against. Now you make the accusation Ataturk should not have tried to emulate western standards, but over 80 years later, when western society has defeated facism, communism and theocracy, can you honestly say he made the wrong choice? And your final point, that he wanted to make Turkey more powerful, well...welcome to international relations my friend :) --

2285:"K.A." should be 2,620,000 - 2,110,000 = 510,000. Thus, "M.K.A." may be about four times more frequent than "K.A." alone. The results are similar if I exclude "-site:.tr". And mark that the results for "K.A." alone still include tokens of abbreviated "M. Kemal Atatürk", or tokens where authors may have felt "K.A." was a complex last name, so referring to just "K.A." would be like referring to simply "Bush" or "Clinton" - okay in running text, but still not the form you'd choose in an encyclopedia entry. - I must admit, though, that the figures for "M.K.A." drop considerably if I restrict to "site:.edu" or "site:.uk". 3323:"They're not taught the brutalities they've caused during the invasion of Anatolia". If you mean school history you are 100% right. Would not fit with having a "heroic" version of Greek history. Greeks alternatively being the "sole resistance" to tyranny and "liberators" of "our" lands from an assortment of conquerors. Not being the tyrants and conquerors ourselves in several cases. However more serious historians tend to adress the atrocities of both sides and so does a popular genre of Greek literature which focuses on the lives of Anatolian Greeks from late 2739:"controversial" by opposing just to oppose (without even bothering to write their own reasons for opposal). They don't care about what others say, they don't listen they just oppose. There's no good faith in continuously stopping someone from making an edit; who already accepted to do all the work neccessary not to leave anything missing or messy behind. Those are the ones making a big deal of it, those are the ones undoing my edits without showing the patience for me to finish my work and strangely almost all of those are Greeks. Enough? 1224:. In non-Turkish literature He is usually referred to as "Mustafa Kemal", "Atatürk" or "Kemal Atatürk". People withouth an in-depth knowledge of Turkish history can get confused and get the impression that "Mustafa Kemal" and "Atatürk" were two different people. I thus believe "Kemal Atatürk", combining the two, is the appropriate term for this article. Please do not move the article until consensus is reached. Unilateral moves easily leaves a horrible mess with dead links, blank pages and ublicate pages. 582:. In non-Turkish literature He is usually referred to as "Mustafa Kemal", "Atatürk" or "Kemal Atatürk". People withouth an in-depth knowledge of Turkish history can get confused and get the impression that "Mustafa Kemal" and "Atatürk" were two different people. I thus believe "Kemal Atatürk", combining the two, is the appropriate term for this article. Please do not move the article until consensus is reached. Unilateral moves easily leaves a horrible mess with dead links, blank pages and ublicate pages. 3362:"they were not taught the destruction they've made on the Ottoman monuments in greece". Again not in school history or resources by the official Greek state. But other historical researches are not bound by this bias. For example "Haunted Balkans" by George Stamkos contains entire chapters to efforts since of "clensing our history" by destroying any monument with no Greek and Orthodox legacy. Destructions of Muslim mosques and graveyards, monuments left by centuries of prevailance of 4078:

to beat up on them and help build on his popularity. If Ataturk had failed, Turkey would be totally different today just like if the Weimar republic had been more credible, maybe Hitler would have never come to power. Do you understand the analogy now? And what exactly do you mean when you say that Ataturk was not that evil? What exaclty was evil about him? That he wanted to defend his nation from being annihilated by a group of racist thugs? Are you kidding me?

2208:

articles to be directed to the FULL and CORRECT name of this great person which is NOT a very difficult thing to do. I'm proposing that the article should bear the title with his FULL name and MOST COMMON name should be redirected to that so that people can LEARN THE CORRECT INFORMATION. IT IS NOT A NAME ONLY ALL TURKS CALL HIM; IT HIS HIS NAME THAT EVERYBODY DOES CALL HIM. It is his FULL name given in the article itself, is it so hard to understand?

31: 3416:

of "Kızıl" and it was called "Kocacık" where they were settled down show that his roots from "Kızıl - Oghuz Turkmens" who were one of the most important Turkish tribes about Turkization of Anatolia. And only aristocrat Turks (princes, imams, high bureaucrats, high educated ones, powerfull ones, who had slaves and so on) had that "Efendi" title in Ottoman Empire. So father of Atatürk came from a noble Turkish family.

4465: 3997: 376:

sending agents to incite riots(and thats right,amongst minorities and fanatical muslims!!!now give me a bottle of Guiness as reward),openly speaking to an English Sergeant on the same level while denying audience to envoys from Anatolian Independence Movement.That in itself is a massive insult to integrity of whats left of the Sultanate,and an open "eff you" to Atatürk's movement.

506:

state and its essentiality well enough. Even today Ataturk remains to be a symbol for those who do not believe to be governed under sheriah, and it is a bit sad really for Turks that they still need to hold on to Ataturk as a symbol to push the Sheriah a side. After all, this is very own reason for abolishing caliphacy. But then, Turkey still needs to face its recent past...

518:

the other hand, even during the Independence War, he hold on to an elected, national parliament. He always respected the parliament as the sole sovereign, which represents the people. If he could have survived -I guess- he would retire and evaluate if his system is working or not, by rejecting the next Presidential candidacy. Could his friends accept this? I am not sure."

3359:. Naturally bias was evident in the works of both sides. References to the homosexuality or bisexuality of Alexander can be found in many modern Greek resources. Unfortunately the majority of the Greek public has never heard of them and many legitimate historians dismiss the notion of a heroe not being straight as an arrow. Cultural bias against homosexuality. 296:

secularism, his abolition of the sultan, his western dress code, yet these were all measures Ataturk thought necessary to bring Turkey to western civilisational standards. The fact is Turkey was not ready for democracy, you cannot end a 630 year empire and implement a democracy immediately, a period of transition under a strong leader was essential. --

118:, 4 May 2006 I have read about his Jewish roots. It is a fact that he attended Sefardic Jeshiva in Saloniki and alongside with Jamal Talaat and Enver was a graduate of that Jeshiva. I really believe that Ittihat va Taraky was a masonic lodge and Ataturk was Jewish himself. That is the reason he was so anti islamic as it is cited in the article. 1026:

the most common and accurate form of his referral: "Mustafa Kemal Atatürk". I hereby call administrators to move this article under the topic of "Mustafa Kemal Atatürk" as suggested (and the opposers to get along with it) in respect to the consensus achieved in favor of the supporters. I by the way would be very glad to help/do it myself.

1050:- I looked for this article expecting it to be under Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, and was supprised when it wasn't. I didn't really know anything about him before reading the article, so I guess that makes my experince, which is that I've only ever seen him refered to as "Atatürk" or "Mustafa Kemal Atatürk", one indicative of common usage. 2380:==Examples== Examples of common names that Knowledge uses instead of a more elaborate, more formal or more scientifically precise version include: *] (not ]) *] (not ]) *] (not ]) *] (not ]) *] (not ]) *] (not ])  1959: 3336:"they're not taught the inhumanities they've committed on the Turkish Cypriots before 1974". Or anything else about the history of Cyprus but a few minor glimpses when a change of hands occurs. However you find references to "bloody incidents" by extremists of both sides in the "History of the Greek Nation" vol. 16 and 232:"Thanks to the democracy seeds that he spreaded, Turkish nation won many victories in many hard situation inside and outside of the country. Stalin claimed that Atatürk was a Fascist. Hitler and Mussolini saw him as a Communist and even some said he was a dictator... But his nation called him the father of all Turks" 3303:"Those greeks invaded our homeland, raped Turkish women, killed everything on their way even infants and pregnant women whlie invading as well as while fleeing from the might of Turkish soldiers rightfully defending their homeland in the lead of Atatürk, and now HE is the murderer". Remember that according to the 499:

ancient concept of a tyrant, although initially "tyrant," like "dictator," was not a negative term. A wide variety of leaders coming to power in a number of different kinds of regimes, such as military juntas, single-party states, and civilian governments under personal rule, have been described as dictators."

3709:

and opens a discussion about any bias that might be present in it on the talk page, or states any obvious and widely recognized issue as overlooked in the article. But I do not understand the motive behind complaining on the talk page for not finding enough criticism on an encyclopedic biography article,

4077:

uhhh, I was under the impression that your point was that Ataturk's victory gave the YT a boost of morale and beefed up their nationalistic designs leading to the armenian massacres. Well, using the same logic the Weimar republic, being a puppet regime set up by the victors gave Hitler an opportunity

3009:

The difference is that obviously there are many Greeks who criticise such POVs and would even add to your comment, if its aim was not to generalise this behavior to the whole of the Greek (wiki) population. I am one of those who certainly discourage such inflammatory edits from fellow Greeks. For the

1025:

I guess the discussion ended here with a majority of SUPPORTERS vs. some opposers (who actually have no solid justifications but only excuses and a strange resistance to FULL and CORRECT information). Nobody requests deletion of the name "Kemal Atatürk" from the system, but it should be redirected to

517:

Anyone can call Hitler or Mussolini a dictator without hesitation, but nobody can really define what a dictator is. So you can ask: Then why do you exclude Atatürk from this quality?' There are lots of reasons. Primarily, Atatürk was working to found a system that would live after his death. (...) On

438:

Think on this: One must take into consideration the difficult situation that Ataturk was in after the war before making assumptions about his form of rule. While he did run a dictatorship, one must consider what he had to work with before making statements that describe his actions as "clamping down

395:

Atatürk lost his self control,and tried to erase everything accorded to the past,so that we might not be judged again.Mind you,Ottoman state was the first nation to be accused of "Crimes against humanity."(oh the hypocrisy!YES!The French didn't butcher Algerians,the Brits didn't want to gas the Kurds

368:

No.Looking from this side/perspective it still was a rich and INDUSTRIOUS continent.Yes,its world leaders might be imperialistic greedy devils,but Ottoman State or what ruin's left of it was infinitesimally small and poorer compared to it.Yes,honor and integrity are lovely ideals,but they don't cloth

306:

Mr. Garnet, Perhaps you are misunderstanding my reference to the totalitarians. I am in no way implying that Ataturk was "evil" in the sense that Hitler was evil (though his ruthless treatment of ethnic minorities does draw that connection). Nevertheless, like the totalitarians, he aimed to control

295:

I think you are very off the mark, especially your accusation that he resembled Musollini or Hitler. Ataturk was revolutionary, he wanted to turn the Ottoman empire on its head. People were not ready for this, the majority of society was still argricultural and illiterate, they did not agree with his

290:

Mr. "Can," First, I am niethor Armenian nor European, but your conclusion that I am merely shows how closed-minded you are about this issue. And dolt? Where did you dig up that fossil of an insult. Anyway, if it doesn't offend you, allow me to use a touch of logic. Let's examine the circumstances

181:

Mustafa Kemal was a dictator in many senses of the word. What sets him apart from other dictators however is the fact that he didn't share the fate of his contemporaries; Hitler committed suicide to avoid being captured alive, Mussolini was murdered by the Italian Communist Party, and Franco (despite

126:

today. The Ottoman Emprie sent a big Turkish population to Balkans to form a stronger order on Europe. Atatürk's ancestors were from this group of people. Some would argue that he had an European look but this is all wrong. He was brown-haired. After his death, Turkish painters showed him as blond in

3939:

One must be blind not to see how these facts are connected. Threat of defeat, danger and finally a welcome solution to whipe out all Christians of Turkey! - Hmm, as far as I know Chamberlain was not German. But Atatürk was on fighting on the same Turkish front as the Young Turks.... the analogy does

3903:

By the same token you could argue that Russians and the western powers (for that matter) were indirectly responsible for the massacres of armenians as they encouraged them and then turned a blind eye, or that Neville Chamberlain through his policy of appeasement was responsible for the death of more

3877:

Where do I imply that? Kinross writes that Atatürk's victory at the Dardannelles gave a breathing-space to the Young Turks to pursue their genocidal policy. He made it possible but I do not think it was Atatürk's intention (causa finalis). He surely defended his country. It is so easy to understand.

3683:

I think you should mind using the word "support". The most important point to realize here is that this is not a support / oppose page and that Knowledge aims to be an encyclopedia. I personally am against dividing people into ideological camps and assuming them to hold certain views solely based on

3437:

A person is what him/herself self-identifies to be. Fortunately, our brains don't have a ROM with pre-programmed ethnicities according to our geneaology. People are raised to be Greeks, Albanians, Jews, Americans or Turks. I think there is no doubt whatsoever about Kemal in that sense. Anything else

3423:

Family of Zübeyde Hanım who is mother of "Mustafa Kemal" were Turkmens who had settled down in "Sarıgöl (Balkans)" from "Taşkale town" where was dependent to "Karaman (Anatolia) province" after collapsaded of "Karaman Principality". There was - Sarıgöl - a Turkish inhabitting where was founded after

3319:

forces were more or less reduced to a disorganized pack with military discipline being a memory. Killings of civilians were not out of the question either. However what do you mean "killed everything on their way". If this was the case any Greek-held territorry would have no Turkish population to be

2166:

Evidently, plain "Kemal" is the most common English appellation. However, if we exclude it from both "Kemal Ataturk" and "Mustafa Kemal Ataturk", we end up with the result that "Kemal Ataturk" is some 400 times more common. I really don't understand why Knowledge should choose to call someone with a

1658:

I don't get it why people don't get it. Did those who vote "oppose" actually read and understand the article? Hardly. His normal name, "Mustafa Kemal" (that is first name, last name, not two first names) was extended with the title "Atatürk" to the final official name of "Mustafa Kemal Atatürk" that

1340:

His name in Turkish parlance is relevant here and valid EVERYWHERE, because its correct form is in Turkish. Besides it is not a matter of Turkish or English, like every other man on earth, he has a single name and more than every single being on earth he deserves to be referred to as his CORRECT and

498:

The discussion here is should Ataturk be called a dictator? Dictator in wikipedia is cited as: "... a leader who holds an extraordinary amount of personal power, especially the power to make laws without effective restraint by a legislative assembly. It is comparable to (but not synonymous with) the

228:

How can you say that! Atatürk was the first President of the Turkish Republic. Still i am not sure if you even know what it means to be the "president". He defeated imperialist powers of Great Britain and he was also the first person to wage and to win a war against far- right religious system. Here

3415:

Ali Rıza Efendi was born in 1839 at Manastır's "Kocacık sub-district" where was dependent to "Debre-i Bala sanjak". The family had flee to Selanik later. Father of Ali Rıza Efendi was "Kızıl Hafız Ahmet Efendi" who was a primary school teacher and his uncle was "Kızıl Hafız Mehmet Efendi". Nickname

2207:

Of course it is normal that the shortest form of the name to be the most common one, the thing is that even people just typing "Kemal" should be reaching this article, no argument on that. Once again, I'm not arguing that all other names should be removed or deleted, I'm proposing that all relevant

1282:

I withdraw my vote, which partially was based on irrational irritation because the page continuously was moved unilaterally by a single user witheout trying to reach a consensus. Both Kemal Atatürk and Mustafa Kemal Atatürk are perfectly appropriate. My initial oppose vote basically argued the case

524:

Without him, Ottoman kings would survive to this day and it'd be definitely be a "saddam"ic dictatorship and it would possibly be a bloody enemy of greece, bulgaria, armenia and to other christian countries. There would be even a third world war going around. So, calm down. Praise him, he destroyed

505:

One more note: For a majority of the Turkish people Ataturk denotes the way of living and Laicism as well as the modern state. it is great from this stance. However it may also be criticized that his accomplishments are not stated objectively and generations have been raised without questioning the

483:

This is probably one of the silliest remarks I have ever read, first of all the massacres (certainly not genocide) took place way before Ataturk came to power, he was in no way involved in the relocation of minorities only in maintaining the territorial integrity of what became modern Turkey. If it

467:

sorry i didnt have time to read the whole discussion but calling Ataturk a dictator is very stupid and ignorant since he spent his whole life on trying to bring multi party democracy while he had a chance to be a Sultan. If you are saying this about the minority or Islam issue, then you should know

3708:

I do want this article to be complete and it certainly should include every notable aspect within its scope. The article is open to the whole world to edit in a way complying with the ethics of Knowledge, so please do not worry. I can of course understand if one picks a certain part of the article

2738:

Answer:Because it is not a controversial topic to rename an article, this is a free encylopedia and given the justifications and within some basic rules anyone can edit anything as he/she feels neccessary. But some people are insisting on making a big deal about it and trying to make the situation

2589:

Anyway, I now count 14:7 votes, which makes it a clean 2/3 majority - more than enough for a minor issue like this. I'd say, unless someone strongly feels that the full MKA form is not only unncessesary but actually harmful, we should move towards closure of this poll rather soon. Shall we give it

2357:

I don't know what exactly you're doing there, Niko, but I have the strong impression that the '-"multi-word phrase"' syntax in Google really doesn't return 'anything' reliable. Especially if in a '+"phrase1" -"phrase2"' search phrase1 or phrase2 are contained within each other. When I do +KA -MKA,

1886:

My statement "As if Greek or Armenian would differ from one another when it comes to being anti-Turkish" did NOT mean that ALL Greeks and ALL Armenians are anti-Turkish, I tried to mean that both Greeks and Armenians COULD be equally anti-Turkish if they wish to be, it is a matter of preference of

316:

About the constitutional monarchy: your claim about it being "the best path to democracy" is fair, but also keep in mind that fairly fresh in the mind at that time and place were the Ottoman Empire's two previous experiments therewith, which either fizzled out pathetically into nothing at all (the

3802:

The correct question is: How does this relate to the article at hand and what kind of a change do you propose to be done with the article, in light of the citation you provided? This talk page is not a forum about Atatürk or Turkish / Armenian history, and the sole purpose for its existence is to

2647:

First of all I apologize from all who might felt offended with my UPPERCASE quotes, it was never my intention to shout or insult anyone, I wrote the key aspects of my comments in uppercase to attract more attention, just because I can't underline them here. What I call shouting is writing all the

1765:

Please don't pretend to have ideas before you have enough knowledge about the subject topic! If you have no information about the topic AT ALL (this part goes to Matthead) at least read the subject article once. Even a 7-year-old reading the article can see and understand that "Kemal" in "Mustafa

564:

OK, let me explain, he has been referred to as Mustafa, Mustafa Kemal, Mustafa Kemal Pasha, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk and Gazi Mustafa Kemal Atatürk throughout his life and there after but he had never been referred to as "Kemal Atatürk" ever. Mustafa Kemal Atatürk is his full name, thus he should be

244:

God! Deliogul, please come back when you grow up. Seriously I cannot help myself to comment on what you have been writing about Ataturk. Are you holding a political science degree? Obviously no. Are you familiar with politics? Obviously no. So, how can you just come with this ridicilious partisan

3973:

AFAIK Ataturk was in no way affiliated with the YT movement, and to provide you a more accurate analogy, its like blaming the Weimar republic for WW2. In any case I dont see what your point is??? So what if Ataturk's victory boosted the moral of the YT movement??? You seem keen to sully Ataturks

3684:

their ethnicity. But if we were to think like you've stated, there are numerous wikipedians of Greek ethnicity actively working on the English Knowledge, and if there were widespread criticisms of Atatürk, by them, like you hinted at (you actually did not present an instance of criticism and say

2609:

Ok, although I had a-week-since-started in mind (16+7=June 23rd). Can you please explain why I would object to adding "Mustafa" if I was anti-Turk? What exactly would be Greece's benefit from that? I still sincerely believe that "Kemal Ataturk" is much more common. You can name it "Mustafa Kemal

1301:

Knowledge is a place to learn thing and get yourself improved, if non-Turkish people are going to be confused then a small addition can be embedded inside the article to prevent such a confusion. However it's my personal opinion that it won't take a genius to understand that it's only one person

478:

yes he didnt want a state like afganistan thats why he deported from their home land all christian people from asia minor and killed them.if you go to turkey you see his picture like the lenin ,stalin ,hilter and musolini on the walls and you think that you have enterd a dictatorship.hitler when

416:

BUT:A man challenges 400 years of defeat in a row,jams the wheel of time and makes the "Eastern Peoples"(badly loose term I know)enjoy victory in the face of "White Man",makes the place with most ethnic and political clashes and geostrategic importance a secure haven for next generations,assures

4236:

movement, and to provide you a more accurate analogy, its like blaming the Weimar republic for WW2. In any case I dont see what your point is??? So what if Ataturk's victory boosted the moral of the YT movement??? You seem keen to sully Ataturks image in any way possible, but this is just plain

976:. I can't find that "Kemal Atatürk" alone is any more common in careful English usage than either simply "Atatürk" or the full "Mustafa Kemal Atatürk", and I can also understand why it would grate in Turkish ears. "Mustafa Kemal Atatürk" hurts no-one, so why not use it? We also - rightly - have 375:

Eh???Constitutional Monarchy?It leads to democracy in rich countries with intellectual citizens,rich middle-class(the backbone of any nation),decent press-freedom,and strong infrastructure.We had none,and the Sultan committed several crimes in WW1,such as acting against the freedom movement and

249:

This was only a little detail from a documentary film. Also where do you get the right to insult to me? For example, I don't stand up and say Abraham Lincoln was a dictator. This passage only shows the place of Mustafa Kemal Pasha in the eyes of Turkish people. By the way, I am trying to get an

3483:

Nikosilver, do not take the disscussion to another path. I've just written the real roots of him against the effort of changing history of greeks and for enlighten the people. Could you please show me where I mean "Jewish or Albanian genes are inferior"?! YOU greeks think so as we can see from

3177:

There are other examples too, as there are examples for many out of hand situations in most peoples history for most leaders of most sides during war. If things like that happened today, Kemal would probably be in Hague with charges for war crimes, despite the fact that he himself may have not

2132:

There is no consensus until this straw-poll is over (someone should specify a reasonable timeframe). The tally now is 7/10 (ha ha, rings any bell?) A proposal has to have at least 60% (while now it has 58.8%) to show clear consensus. Anyway, since I'm supposed to be one of those anti-Turk guys

494:

I think too many ideas are brought forward into this discussion without much facts. Issues such as the population exchange with Greece are highly complex but carried out on a consensus with the legitimate Greek government of its' time. On many other fronts, most of the authors use their common

2860:

and used by the owner of the names themselves, therefore they're the most common names (actually most of the people don't even know about their real names). However as indicated before "Kemal Atatürk" alone is a missing thus wrong definition for Atatürk's name, just like referring to Bush as

941:

462:

I've not edited on wikipedia before, so I'm sorry if I'm doing it incorrectly. In the article, introduction, it states: "...Mustafa Kemal led the Turkish national movement in what would become the Turkish War of Independence. Responsible for the genocide of 1.5 million Armenians in 1915. His

495:

knowledge and bias to post discussions rather than researching the topic well. Comparing Hitler and Ataturk if needs to be done, should clearly be documented and needs to be well researched rather than just merely accusing him. What are you reading before you post here? "The little prince?"?

346:

I think it is easy for us to sit here and write "there was a more moderate way to go about this" and criticse the man for being "ruthless". Why did he remove the Sultan? The Sultan had come to represent corruption and weakness, concerned more with his post, than the plight of his people. The

176:

I didn't even finish the first paragraph. As soon as I saw the line about Kamal promoting democracy, I had to stop. The fact is that while he did institute many admirable reforms, he was in fact an iron-fisted dictator, controling the populace with a one party system similar to that of the

3218:

Enough is enough! There's no difference between calling all greek mothers whores along other Greeks sons of bitches and calling the Father of Turks a murderer. There can be no justification to such an insult. Actually there is more to say about greek mothers but sorry for not being equally

254:

about the issues such as history of Turkey, history of the Ottoman- Seljuk- Hun and Gokturk Empires, regional politics, international politics of Turkey and politics of the other countries in this region. I am repeating it... Please be polite. With respect, the son of the nomadic warriors,

152:

Thesedays people(maybe animals I don't know) argue that a blonde person can't be a Turk(they say that just to claim a wrong theory about the origins of Mustafa Kemal Pasha) but the funny thing is Turks can be blonde but actually Atatürk wasn't blonde and I only gave this data because it is

484:

wasnt for him, there would be no Turkey but carved out provinces so he will forever be remembered in the hearts and minds of Turks because his deeds were simply awe inspiring. And please stop comparing him to evil thugs such as Hitler whose sole purpose was to exterminate the Jews.

328:), but not necessarily from a perspective (i.e. Mustafa Kemal's) that was not (or at least not wholly) European, and which was, in fact, given to idolizing the West/Europe owing simply to the fact that the Ottoman Empire was in a pretty damned shoddy state for the whole of his life. 2758:

than your tone, so I apologise on behalf of them (if there are any). However, next time you face what you sense as irrational opposition, better check if it was you that attracted it in the first place. My consideration was in terms of being more common as an English appellation.

4171:

I see that you are in the business of making things up! Where exactly did I say that it was a fact that he he was in no way affiliated with the YT movement? From my sentance, its clear that it is a supposition, not a fact so please do your homework before jumping to conclusions!

409:

End:Atatürk donated almost his whole property into a bank he founded,in order to allow us Turks who never got credit from Europe (since we are E-V-I-L, you again Europe) during this time to enjoy the fruits of banking,and a small bit he spent for his surviving family members.

2753:

Yes. Enough. I understand how you may feel, but please keep in mind that not all people are crazy here. Probably your tone was not appreciated to the extent that users would object to just anything you proposed (see Bert's comment after removing vote). This is wrong, maybe

1753:

Incidentally, Matthead, the "Kemal" in "Mustafa Kemal" is not, as you claim, a "last name", but—as the article that you indirectly accuse people of not having read explicitly states—an "additional name"; i.e. not quite a first name, perhaps, but certainly not a last name.

1580:

Coolcat, would you please elaborate this abit? This debate seems to be well conducted about how we best capture the name of the person in the title of his article. How is that political motivated? What kind of rants do you see here, that you have no tolerance to? Cheers

2648:

comment in uppercase which I have never done; nevertheless I'll pay more attention to that from now on, not to unintentionally offend anyone. Once again let me explain more clearly: He has been referred to as different names throughout history (in chronological order):

3255:

Thank you for your kind words of wisdom. It was the Turkish inhabited metropolis' that were pillaged, burnt, ethnic-cleansed and scorched by Greeks! I will seek forgiveness for my sinful soul in the hands of Kemal Almighty when I die. I am sorry for insulting your

1869:

Your claim, "Greek users opposing without even bothering to supporting their basis", is all well and good, but please consider that said supporters did support their votes by means of the claim "per Bertilvidet"; i.e., they opposed for the same reasons stated by

1780:

And while talking about politically motivated voters, strangely most (maybe all, because not all can be seen clearly) of the opposing voters are strangely GREEK(and they don't even bother to state the basis of their opposal; what a coincidence isn't it? (see:

1387:

Why don't you help me finding and editing the blank pages and dead links you claim to have occurred. I'm willing to correct these mistakes and work hard for it, just point me the errors instead of making destructive criticism and insisting on what's WRONG.

468:

that all the developed nations in that era were(and still is like France) nation states not identifying any ethnic groups and about the islam thing, he just wanted Turkey to NOT be like afghanistan or Iran so he had to seperate the religion and government.

463:

successful military campaigns..." Not only is the genocide sentence awkardly inserted, but it is untrue. Regardless of your opinions of the Armenian Genocide, Kemal Ataturk could not have participated in it in 1915 since he was stationed at Gallipoli.

379:"No, his dictatorial measures were aimed at increasing Turkey's (and therefore his own) power by any means necessary, even if it meant crushing ethnic minorities, forcing his country to change its very culture, and stamping out any hope of democracy." 2271:

Uh, Niko, I'm afraid I don't quite follow your Google arithmetics. Of course, every page that contains "M.K.A." also contains "K.A." etc., so a search for '"M.K.A." -"K.A."' should rightfully return zero anyway. Shouldn't it? I calculate as follows:

3713:

talking about what these missing criticisms are. Generally, people do directly modify the article to improve it the way they see fit, and the issue is brought to the talk page only if there are any serious objections from other editors. Regards,

3063:

I refuse get into more discussion to anyone so ignorant and so small minded to call Atatürk a murderer. That's of course the twisted POV of the bearer but calling a man murderer, (even with sugar coated words) whose greatest words of wisdom are:

479:

started his genocide against jews had in mind the genocides he had commited against all minirities in the area of asia minor and was very sure that no one will remember his genocide because ataturk's genocide had left no signs,so his also won't.

182:

living into the 1970s) was quickly forgotten (and reviled) after his death. Kemal left a legacy of reform and progress that perpetuates to this day, whereas the latter dictators left legacies of war, genocide, and the supression of human rights.

3665:

There's no mention of any criticisms of Ataturk. I know many members of the Greek-American community were outraged when Antonio Banderas was going to portray Ataturk in a film about his life, so he certainly isn't universally supported. --

1313:

The fact that his name in Turkish parlance is what it is is not relevant here; this is the English wikipedia, and according to conventions the page name should reflect common usage. In English, the man is referred to as "Kemal Ataturk".

1396:

Quite frankly, since I don't think the page should be moved in the manner in which you're moving it, and you haven't expressed any indication that understand wikipedia policy, I have no interest in "helping" you destructive behavior.

1659:

went into history books. Only these three versions are valid to cover aspects of his life, and only the full version is appropriate to be used for the article. "Kemal Atatürk" is a stub, just like calling the current US-President "

1272:

redirects to this article. Thus, with this logic both Mustafa Kemal Atatürk and Kemal Atatürk would be appropriate; my support for the latter is because of its prevalence in English language litterature and more succint character.

3738:

I was merely suggesting why somebody would see the article as being glorifying of Ataturk. I'm not in any way an expert on Ataturk, so I can't make a point by point argument about what criticism should be added to the article. --

1545:: I refuse to vote here as at least half of the people are politicaly motivated voters. I also have no tolerance to the rant such as the ones above. As far as google is concerned Ataturk has no "common" name but two common names: 3068:" is out of bounds of logic and clearly either an intentional insult or a result of ignorancy combined with lack of wisdom. It may be one's narrow minded vision to collect every single leader of the time under the same adjective 386:

Atatürk had a superb vision of the future,and saw how Europeans managed to incite unrest amongst minorities (and got away with it,while seeing all of themselves as Europeans),and tried to amputate a future worry from the very

1519:). It also says "Mustafa Kemal Ataturk" right in the first line of the article, so anyone reading it will know immediately what his complete name is. (BTW, that should really be 毛泽东, since he's the one who introduced 简体字). 926:). It also says "Mustafa Kemal Ataturk" right in the first line of the article, so anyone reading it will know immediately what his complete name is. (BTW, that should really be 毛泽东, since he's the one who introduced 简体字). 3643:

The article tries to convey Atatürk's life and deeds and I think that it is still only a quarter of what it should be in terms of length and quality. I urge you to explain how this article differs from, say, the articles of

2763:

against you, or Turkey, or... Kemal, and I'll be happy to protect the version that will gain majority in votes. And if anybody says that the article is controversial because of a "Mustafa" in the name, I'll be the first to

3343:"they were not taught that Alexander who was actually a Macedonian (not greek) as well as being homosexual". Actually we were taught that Macedonians argued they were Greeks and the view was supported by figures such as 197:

I've got a question for the above 3, because I'm just stumped about this. Just how exactly do you manage to spew diarrhea from your mouth so ferociously that you manage to oversee the ludicrousness of the diarrhea?

1887:

the person. I'm not going to make a debate on this, sorry for any inconvenience and any misunderstandings but I'm behind my word. Re-statement: "A Greek or an Armenian could be equally motivated to be anti-Turkish

3022:

time. Kemal was a very wise man and I almost envy Turks for having him! Regardless if he was forced by the circumstances to be a-sort-of-what-you'd-call-today-a-murderer, you must be proud (and I know you are)!

3151:), which they captured after the withdrawal of the Greek troops. During the confusion and anarchy that followed, a great proportion of the city was set ablaze, and the properties of the Greeks were pillaged. A 161:. A polite person should introduce him/herself to the person that he/she talks to. You read my paragraph but you didn't understand anything and that makes me sad. With respect, the son of the nomadic warriors, 3369:"they're not taught that the captured general of greek invading forces, Trikopis, was treated like a guest by Atatürk rather than an animal until he returned back to greece." That would be Nikolaos Trikoupis ( 3169:

The paragraphs that follow specify that it is highly disputed that it could have been the Greek forces who burned (themselves?) and that Kemal issued an order (after) that would punish every vandalising Turk,

749:. I just checked several books - recently published, and written in English - and they all have "Mustafa Kemal Ataturk". The fact that the name is abbreviated in conversation or informal use is irrelevant. -- 4420:, and I'd like to point out that, any commentary on Ataturk aside, this analogy is ridiculous. I suggest any who believe in this version of German history spend a bit more time studying the Weimar Republic. 3163:

occurred during the days remembered by the Greeks as "the Catastrophe of Smyrna". However, the majority of the Greeks managed to seek refuge on Greek and Allied ships at the harbor of Izmir and other coastal

2358:

then among the first few pages that come up are in fact several that do contain MKA. And if I do +MKA -KA, although by rights the result should be zero, I get only slightly fewer results than for +MKA alone.

1469:

Thank you for the lesson in both logic and the Turkish alphabet, Matthead; I greatly appreciate it. I hereby withdraw my vote of "oppose" and enter no vote in its place. Anyhow, the issue has been discussed

3331:

Books like "Matomena Homata" (Bloody Grounds) make a point of pointing an accusing finger at both sides and how both people managed to annihilate each other while blinded by their "patriotic" ideologies.

4123:

Your analogies do not convince me, yet. - Hmm, as you mix up completely different ways of thought and belief like Calvin and Luther I understand your so-called (=sözde) analogies a little bit better now.

3178:

endorsed them. However, hard times, required hard solutions, and those times were indeed hard for all of us. Please respect my POV, which is also the POV that prevails in WP articles, and stop using

222:

In his words: "Many people accuse me to be a strongman. Sure, it is true that I have the might to do anything I please, but I have this might by winning the people's hearts, not by oppressing them."

2810:

Unlike William Jefferson Clinton, or the others quoted above, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk is not his formal name, but his commonly used name. Kemal Ataturk has just become a shorthand. A quick look on

1341:

FULL name (in Turkish because he is Turkish!). If you people don't know how to refer to him, this is your chance; LEARN IT and let athers learn the correct form of it, not how you understand.

1260:

Sorry if I didn't express myself clearly. My point was that the title should include parts of both his original name and his later attributed name. Exactly like we have an article called

1877:

P.S. Your statement, "s if Greek or Armenian would differ from one another when it comes to being anti-Turkish" (now deleted), was not particularly fair, I think. But, to each his own. —

1409:

per all other oppositions above. Incidentally, "RESPECT HIS REAL NAME" and naming him in the article title "in Turkish because he is Turkish" would also lead to—to give some examples—

650:

per all other oppositions above. Incidentally, "RESPECT HIS REAL NAME" and naming him in the article title "in Turkish because he is Turkish" would also lead to—to give some examples—

2381:*] (not ]) *] (not ]) *] (not ]) *] (not ])  447:

it cant be in the article. Also please use another form of comunication if the debate isn't about material in the article. Article talk pages are not ment for social gatherings... --

2610:

Ataturk of Ali Rıza and Zübeyde Hanım" if you so wish. The more difficult it is for readers to locate the article name, the greater the benefit (a nationalist Greek would think)!

2122:

What war? My move is not unilateral anymore, if you don't respect FULL and CORRECT information, RESPECT the decision and consensus of Wikipedians, and don't turn this into a war.

3868:

It seems dubious to imply that the Turks defended Gallipoli in order to be able to successfully commit a genocide. I think defending their country is a more likely rationale. --

2921:

Whether or not they are preferred by the person whose name it was is not the most important piece here. Please reaed the guideline, and address your argument to deal with that.

3656:, in what you call "glorifying". You should also present solid cases from the article, instead of putting here an unsigned, vague comment for the article as a whole. Regards, 2167:

name that only (some) Turks use. I also don't understand why we are making such a big deal about it, and why this can be considered an anti-Turk gesture! Please enlighten me.

2731:) any of the mentioned names above. But any other combination of his names would be a wrong referral more than being inaccurate. So, please, stop insisting on a mistake! PS: 1567:

How have you done a google test here? The three "options" are subsets of each other, so any result for "Mustafa Kemal Ataturk" is also going to be a hit for the other two.

3513:

in whatever a Greek says? Didn't you understand that my comment was actually supporting? Add your info in the article, but keep in mind it doesn't matter if his genes were

601:, but only once and not 10 times a day. Starting from Mustafa Kemal, he was styled Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, and this is his proper name since, as used by other Wikis, namely 137:

Deliogul wikipedia is not the place to fabricate stories. He was blonde and he had blue eyes. Don't try to frame reality to fit your own ideology. I am a Turk by the way.

148:

but sadly I am not even sure if you know anything about Turkish roots, Yoruk Turks and other tribes. Yes, there are maybe millions of blonde Turkic people out there but

4223:

Apocolocynthosis: You wrote what you wrote and now you deny that out of a suden? Well, done my lutherian specialist in denialism, revisionism, cognitive dissonance. :-)

193:

His followers were/are dictators and the US loves Turkey's airbases so who cares if the Turkish people like him or not. His reforms were of the brand, like it or die.

3438:

is redundant, unless ofcourse you mean that Jewish or Albanian genes are inferior, so a man as wise as Kemal is in danger of belonging to some sort of lesser people!

1596:, that's Mustafa Kemal's most common name, both within Turkey and abroad (see e.g. the two major English-language biographies, by Lord Kinross and Andrew Mango). ---- 696:, that's Mustafa Kemal's most common name, both within Turkey and abroad (see e.g. the two major English-language biographies, by Lord Kinross and Andrew Mango). ---- 2931:

You are right Siafu. As I have posted numerous times above, the guideline says that the most frequently used name should be the title. I just thought of 3 things:

372:"he would not have disposed of the sultan, and instituted a constitutional monarchy, which has been shown time and time again to be the best path to democracy..." 324:

About it being "increasingly difficult to argue that Europe was an enlightened society" post-World War One: this is true enough from a European perspective (hence

3385:. He is not much of a celebrity nowadays but you are right, he was returned more or less safe. He was discharged after his return, recalled to duty in 1927 as an 2157: 1766:

Kemal" is NOT a surname, but a part of his forename (given by his math teacher), so (this goes to all who oppose) that's why you can't split it from the half.

404:

Atatürk was evil to the core,and wanted Anatolia to be a culturally gelded,short sighted minority-less continent ripe for European control.(in short,Bullshit.)

3116:

Refuse it or not, the fact is that he was the leader of Turks. Where I come from, a leader, is responsible even for the actions of his subortinates (hence my

2533:

readers may well prefer MKA over KA. And the relative advantage in commonness of "Julius Caesar" over "Gaius Iulius Caesar" (among well-informed writers) is

153:

interesting, it has nothing to do with ideologies. There is a little difference betwen light brown hair and the blonde hair of Turkish originated people and

3688:

is criticisized, but just stated your observation that criticisms exist) these would have been certainly included in the article, standing right here since

1529:(You are, of course, absolutely right about the simplified Chinese characters; I've just always been partial to the traditional characters myself. My bad. — 3936:. Atatürk indirectly enabled the pursuit of genocidal young turkish policy.... Kinross I (Atatürk footnote) + Kinrosss II (Ottoman Empire footnote) --: --> 2374: 2309:...and google returns only those articles that include the full term (MKA), and atthe same time do not include KA alone. In other words, all articles that 2225: 1947: 1516: 1353: 923: 3695:. This is the way Knowledge works. Please let me stress again that I regret mentioning the name of the Greek nation in an hypothetical discussion of bias. 1372: 1149:

please read again carefully the history before you reply.hitler didnt kill only jews but polish,yougoslavs,russians,greeks,gipsies,homosexuals and so on

3412:

Family of Ali Rıza Efendi, who is father of "Mustafa Kemal", were Kocacık (Kocahamza) Yörüks who were settled down to "Manastır Province" from "Aydın".

2938:

The whole naming conflict situation here is -excuse me- bollocks, so it doesn't matter anyway. Neither Turks, nor anti-Turks (nationalists or not) will

4021:

Well, I do not understand your chronological analogies. If the Young Turk movement corresponds to the Weimar Republic how does Atatürk equivalate the

2446:. The contrast between scientific and common names in taxonomy is not relevant. If people use "Kemal Ataturk" then that should similarly redirect to 2054:

Totals not smack on and there must be some indexing problem but indicates that "Kemal Ataturk" is more common than "Mustafa Kemal Ataturk" on the net

94: 2303:

Well, Google lets you request hits for MKA -KA. The result shows the exact arithmetic you did. I also removed -K. So I did BOTH searches like this:

2214:

And by the way Nikko, if you don't consider 58.8% majority as a consensus and yet wait for a 1.2% then I can't assume good faith of yours anymore.

1499:"Mustafa Kemal Ataturk" is not the way he is commonly known in the English speaking world. Yes, it's the same alphabet, but just because it's his 906:"Mustafa Kemal Ataturk" is not the way he is commonly known in the English speaking world. Yes, it's the same alphabet, but just because it's his 3837:

The British failure at Gallipolli gave a breathing-space to the Young Turk triumvirate, leaving it free to pursue, without external interference,

3769:

The British failure at Gallipolli gave a breathing-space to the Young Turk triumvirate, leaving it free to pursue, without external interference,

3623: 86: 81: 69: 64: 59: 843:

Removed previous vote as an example of good will. I still believe that "Kemal Ataturk" is more common in English, but wouldn't care either way!

2230:"I also don't understand why we are making such a big deal about it, and why this can be considered an anti-Turk gesture! Please enlighten me." 1677:

look here for the same group opposing in an other vote about Turks. They are our friendly! geographical neighbors and some sincere supports :)

2148: 3932:

Not at all! It didn't necessarily follow to exterminate the Armenians but was a logical step. A next step, further stage isn't necessarrily

1971:

give a different indication, use the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things

2594: 2541: 2362: 2289: 1235:

What a logic. Are there people withouth an in-depth knowledge of Whereeveryoucomefrom that can get confused and get the impression that

988: 3940:

not work in your example. And have a look at this page to see the continuity of young Turks and Kemalists: le recyclage des jeune-turcs

1064:

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk is both the most common and the most correct form of his name. I think there should be a redirect to this topic.

1158:

Isn't it consensus yet? I think there's enough supporters against almost no significant, logical opposition. Please move the article.

2472:

You're right. But they were all the other way around last night. Either that or I was hallucinating... That's really strange. --

1265: 2485:

Fut.Perf. and Google: Whatever. Google tests aside, do we really argue here logically if "Mustafa Kemal Ataturk" is more common to

2735:

Question:I also don't understand why we are making such a big deal about it, and why this can be considered an anti-Turk gesture?

1843:

It's just one sentence, read it carefully: "Assume that others intend to follow the policies and guidelines of WP participation,

1457: 2321:

can tell us why he wants "Mustafa" so desperately in the name, while for some nationalistic(?) reason Greeks shouldn't want it?

4530:

Lutherian wrote that Ataturk was in no way affiliatet with the Young Turk movement. Against all evidence! - That equals denial!

3155:

of a significant part of the Christian population (including the lynching and brutal murder of the Greek Orthodox Metropolitan

4485:"It's My Secret Prayer, Too," He Confessed. FORWARD, A Progressive Jewish Newspaper published in New York. January 28, 1994 2591: 2538: 2359: 2286: 985: 3010:

record, I think that most political leaders (Turk, or Greek or whatever) of that time, were indeed voluntary or involuntary

1907:

Sayın Kertenkelebek, isim değişikliğini gerçekleştirmek için muhtaç olduğunuz kudret damarlarınızdaki asil kanda mevcuttur.

107:

WoW. Didn't realize Ataturk was Albanian in origins but then again this site has several questionable people on its list...

565:

referred to as. I'm trying to corret this mistake, please stop resisting, otherwise I'll be doubting your good intentions.

144:

jIf you accept everything that they told to you, this is the outcome. Have you ever seen Atatürk? I am also defending that

3135: 1737: 47: 17: 2435: 1968: 1425:

for Enver Pasha. So let's not talk about "real names" and so forth unless we're willing to get real serious about it. —

666:

for Enver Pasha. So let's not talk about "real names" and so forth unless we're willing to get real serious about it. —

3635: 3476:

Interesting. Would you mind wikifying some of the information as an "ancestry" or "family" subsection of the article?

2698: 1806: 444: 1436:

Another proponent of weird logic. If you oppose Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, then you also have to request a shortening to

529: 488: 472: 456: 430: 337: 300: 274: 259: 239: 202: 186: 1038:- I have never really understood this debate. MKA is his full name, and that is what the article should be named. -- 1011:

per Fut.Perf. I'll change my vote and admit that my initial vote was likely just a knee-jerk reaction. —(a humbled)

427: 271: 235:

Atatürk formed democracy in Anatolia, a region that had never seen democracy before... From this moment, be polite.

2551:"I must admit, though, that the figures for "M.K.A." drop considerably if I restrict to "site:.edu" or "site:.uk"." 724:

If Khoikhoi is changing his vote to support, there must be something wrong in it. Im changing my vote to oppose :D

502:

The decision should be left upon to the reader after this point since not many are interested upon our judgements.

38: 1933:

I have never really understood this debate. MKA is his full name, and that is what the article should be named. --

2828: 2811: 2427: 2071: 1727:

And is there any reason that Knowledge can't be more accurate than both? Is there any reason to repeat a MISTAKE?

1512: 1206: 1143: 919: 245:

defence and dictate fellow authors telling "From this moment, be polite?" What has he told that it offended you?

122:

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk was %100 Turkish. He was from the Yoruk Turks, a nomadic Turkish group that still lives in

2537:

greater than any supposed advantage of "KA" over "MKA" - if there is any such advantage at all, which I doubt.

1674: 365:"it was increasingly difficult to argue that Europe was an enlightened society that would be ideal to emulate" 1805:

Hey, lizard-butterfly, there's no call for that sort of statement, whether it be "right" or "wrong". Remember

1139: 961: 762: 680: 396:

and Arabs,but we?Oohhh we are E-V-I-L!We butchered Pontus Greeks,Armenians,Kurds,Asuri Keldanis...you,Europe.)

1329:, so I suggest you leave the page where it is until you can convince the rest of us that it should be moved. 984:, for instance. Of course, all other forms should exist as redirects, so it's really just a symbolic matter. 382:

That's a deeply controversial issue,and might be needed to discuss in a whole new place.First possibility:

199: 3808: 3715: 3657: 3570:

Suit yourself. I'd add it as a plus if there were claims otherwise. And it is a much better argument than

3156: 2224:. If you admittedly think that "Kemal Ataturk" is more common, then this is how it should be called. Read 4531: 4513: 4482: 4370: 4244: 4037: 3943: 3879: 3848: 3780: 3765:

the notorious turkophile, eminent biographer of Kemal Mustafa Atatürk did not deny the Armenian Genocide

2447: 1558: 790: 602: 515:

Some people consider Atatürk as a dictator. I think that this opinion is wrong and it leads you wrongly.

485: 452: 1479: 423:

CAN out.(notice it's not the English can.It's read like John.A Turkish name meaning "life" in Ottoman)

1553:

and guideline is pretty clear with such cases. If guideline was followed we wouldn't be discussing. --

4417: 2996:

IP Address: 83.235.189.136 Country (Full): Greece Region: Attiki City: Athens ISP: Otenet

2765: 1689: 4534: 4524: 4433: 4424: 4373: 4344: 4269: 4256: 4247: 4176: 4164:

May I add that Mustafa Kemal joined the YT party in 1907? He didn't become a party boss. But to say

4082: 4040: 3978: 3946: 3908: 3882: 3872: 3851: 3811: 3793: 3783: 3743: 3718: 3670: 3660: 3609: 3564: 3552: 3500: 3488: 3469: 3431: 3291: 3249: 3213: 3108: 3054: 3003: 2990:

Another example of a perverted POV of a fanatic anti-Turkish Greek; above quote is posted by (check

2980: 2925: 2914: 2869: 2848: 2839: 2818: 2799: 2743: 2641: 2597: 2584: 2544: 2520: 2476: 2467: 2454: 2416: 2365: 2352: 2292: 2262: 2198: 2126: 2112: 2095: 2074: 2011: 1937: 1926: 1895: 1881: 1864: 1830: 1813: 1797: 1770: 1758: 1744: 1731: 1722: 1707: 1698: 1681: 1667: 1651: 1634: 1621: 1609: 1585: 1571: 1562: 1533: 1523: 1490: 1464: 1429: 1401: 1379: 1360: 1333: 1318: 1287: 1277: 1255: 1228: 1209: 1191: 1146: 1127: 1116: 1105: 1092: 1080: 1068: 1054: 1042: 1030: 1015: 1003: 991: 968: 950: 930: 898: 886: 874: 801: 781: 769: 753: 739: 728: 709: 670: 641: 626: 609: 586: 351: 284: 213: 165: 131: 2218:

Why do you have to be so aggressive? And who decides when the straw-poll ends? Also, please, don't

1878: 1827: 1819: 1810: 1755: 1664: 1555: 1530: 1487: 1461: 1426: 1283:

for any of the two possibilities, so I am surprised to see several users opposing the move per me.

1252: 1124: 1012: 895: 667: 606: 449: 334: 111:

one of the biggest promoters of fascism opressors of Arberesh in Italy "Albanian"? Proof please.

3072:

but Atatürk is no one to be resembled or even be compared to anyone else in the entire timeline.

183: 3394: 3220: 3076: 3000: 2866: 2740: 2443: 2318: 2134: 2123: 1915: 1908: 1892: 1861: 1823: 1794: 1790: 1767: 1741: 1728: 1515:(a redirect), but the article title uses the common version (again, it's all there to be read in 1449: 1389: 1342: 1303: 1159: 1027: 981: 947: 922:(a redirect), but the article title uses the common version (again, it's all there to be read in 684: 566: 1673:

LOL they dont even have to read the article matt, because these people love us(Turks) so much!

3653: 3649: 3645: 2760: 2281:

Since every member of (A) evidently is also a member of (B), the number of pages that contain

977: 3579: 3522: 3439: 3261: 3183: 3024: 2950: 2884: 2769: 2611: 2554: 2490: 2386: 2322: 2232: 2168: 1981: 1248: 844: 811: 4341: 3869: 3790: 3740: 3667: 2138: 2082:

atatürk -"kemal mustafa atatürk" -"mustafa atatürk" -"kemal atatürk": 1,580,000 pages ... --

1923: 1871: 1582: 1453: 1284: 1274: 1225: 1000: 583: 526: 108: 2949:

Hope that answers it for you, and wish we get done with this sooner, one way or the other.

2945:

There can't possibly be any sources to support one self-identification more than the other.

4521: 4517: 4502: 3631: 3307:

your homeland was a Greek homeland and Turks a relatively recent conqueror. Regardless of

2109: 2090: 1786: 1648: 1604: 1475: 1471: 1240: 1113: 1100: 1089: 704: 413:

His yacht Savarona is sold one year ago as far as I reckon.Muslim Fundies hated the ship.

115: 2137:) here, who don't justify their votes (like as if I should flood the page repeating what 1675:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_June_13#Template:Turkic

1422: 663: 369:

shivering Anatolian Peasants,nor does it make citizens prosper,nor feed and arm an army.

4468: 4430: 4253: 4173: 4079: 4000: 3975: 3905: 3804: 3789:

How exactly does it refer to Ataturk? Wouldn't the triumvirate be the Three Pashas? --

3518: 3509:

Yeah, I've personally beheaded lots of them. Can you please stop this complete lack of

3134:

Personally I don't think that it is option #3. One of the results however is quoted in

2836: 2473: 2451: 2220: 1782: 1704: 1618: 1077: 883: 798: 750: 2999:

It is intentionally not removed for display and proof purposes of my previous quotes.

1617:

But the title of the Kinross biography is "Ataturk: A biography of Mustafa Kemal"! --

1202: 4421: 4266: 4262: 3575: 3510: 3496: 3477: 3398: 3386: 3337: 3316: 3179: 2922: 2845: 2815: 2464: 2439: 1934: 1718: 1694: 1568: 1520: 1398: 1376: 1357: 1330: 1326: 1315: 1261: 1198: 1065: 1039: 927: 735: 637: 622: 348: 297: 256: 236: 209: 162: 128: 1482:: always the same logic (or lack thereof), always the same results, always the same 4489: 3324: 3312: 3160: 2832: 2423: 2033:

about 220,000 English pages for "Kemal Atatürk" -"Mustafa Kemal Atatürk" -wikipedia

2027:

about 200,000 English pages for "Kemal Ataturk" -"Mustafa Kemal Ataturk" -wikipedia

1644: 1508: 1445: 1051: 965: 915: 318: 525:

the middle age old muslim empire and converted Turkey to a modern ally of europe--

420:

Labeling,even thinking this man EVIL just makes a stinging pain in my conscience.

127:

their pictures because Atatürk is representing the sunrise on the Turkish nation.

3315:! You are probably right on the rapes, particularly during the retreat since the 2727:("Mustafa Kemal Atatürk") as the title of the article or unpreferably (yet still 150:

Atatürk was light brown-haired and this doesn't mean that he can't has blue eyes.

3561: 3485: 3484:

massacres of Jews and Albanians (along with Turks) in Peloponessia by Greeks. --

3428: 3356: 3304: 2862: 1678: 1631: 943: 725: 719: 469: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3427:

That's to say he was neither Jewish nor Albanian as the Greeks claim. Regards.

3136:

Greco-Turkish War (1919-1922)#The Stalemate and the Turkish Strategic Offensive

2108:

Please stop the move war; this discussion should decide, not unilateral moves.

159:

In Knowledge, the only important thing is the academic writing and being polite

4475: 3627: 3363: 2529:

readers the norm here. Uninformed readers can use the redirects and be happy.

2431: 2084: 1918:

for disruption/edit warring, but it seems that the move would be appropriate.

1598: 1593: 1414: 778: 766: 698: 693: 655: 281: 3839:

a premeditated internal policy for the final elimination of the Armenian race

3771:

a premeditated internal policy for the final elimination of the Armenian race

2935:

Had it been preferred, it would definitely be more frequent than if it hadn't

1713: 4464: 3996: 3378: 3352: 3348: 3344: 2056: 1418: 659: 3560:

Add it or not, I don't mind. I'm writng the truth. That's all what I do. --

2875:

I have removed my vote for now. If you provide a source that Kemal himself

2063:

about 177,000 English pages for "Kemal Ataturk" -"Kemal Atatürk" -wikipedia

605:. Nobody took his first name Mustafa away, and Knowledge should neither. -- 4252:

WTF are you saying acropolis? Have you been skipping on your meds again?

2066:

about 81,900 English pages for -"Kemal Ataturk" "Kemal Atatürk" -wikipedia

2050:

about 285,000 English pages for "Kemal Ataturk" "Kemal Atatürk" -wikipedia

4492:

A book a British convert to Islam, David Musa Pidcock on the Sabbateans.

3366:

in areas of Macedonia and Thrace, Roman Catholic forts and churches, etc.

3308: 3152: 3148: 2676: 1410: 1247:

were three different people, and thus your username needs to be moved to

718::I think the people articles on wikipedia must be under their full name. 651: 1643:: This is neither policy nor practice. For a non-political example, see 1630:

I think the people articles on wikipedia must be under their full name.

3521:

because he was raised to be a Turk and he felt like one. End of story.

3143:

Having breached the Greek defences, the Turks advanced very rapidly to

1660: 794: 123: 2991: 1857:

Greek users opposing without even bothering to supporting their basis.

3689: 3390: 3298:

You are ranting here but you do make sore points that need adressing.

3144: 1437: 1269: 4510:

no wonder genocide denial is a cultivated hobby among turkish people

112: 3355:

and non-Greeks originates from such fervant political opponents as

3847:

London, 2003, p. 614 There is a link between both historic events.

3514: 3257: 2036:

about 147,000 English pages for "Mustafa Kemal Atatürk" -wikipedia

2030:

about 147,000 English pages for "Mustafa Kemal Ataturk" -wikipedia

1460:, before that gets also messed up by far-fetched non-analogies. -- 1441: 1371:

I've put up a notice on this 3RR violation (6 reverts now...) at

3974:

image in any way possible, but this is just plain ridiculous!!!

3692: 3382: 3374: 3370: 1236: 325: 2154:"Mustafa Kemal Ataturk" -"Kemal Ataturk" -Kemal -wikipedia -.tr 2070:

Without the diacritic is more common on the net in English. --

311:

Your points are valid enough. A couple of small points, though.

3827:

Atatürks fierce and successfull resistance at the Dardanelles

3182:, especially as I am very polite and very agreeable with you. 1953: 1244: 25: 3831:(Kinross: Atatürk. The rebirth of a nation; p. 96). ----: --> 3759:

Lord Kinross, turkophile thogh NOT a Armenian genocide denier

3014:

with today's standards. They weren't murderers (or they were

2942:

from one name or the other. All redirects will exist anyway.

513:, English ambassador to Ankara of Atatürk's time. He says: " 2313:

call him MKA. I still can't understand why I must tolerate

280:

Can, good points. But please keep the level cool :-) Best,

3829:

gave a momentary psychological lift to the Turkish people.

3320:

liberated by Kemal. They would have already been deceased!

2047:

about 285,000 English pages for "Kemal Atatürk" -wikipedia

2044:

about 286,000 English pages for "Kemal Ataturk" -wikipedia

2021: 1845:

UNLESS THERE IS CLEAR AND PRESENT EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY

317:

first), or failed dazzlingly into the dictatorship of the

1818:

P.S. As if such things matter, isn't it more likely that

1703:

Brittanica got it wrong. Wouldn't be the first time. --

1421:

for Nagarjuna, and, on the Turkish side of the equation,

662:

for Nagarjuna, and, on the Turkish side of the equation,

2317:

characterizations for something as silly as that. Maybe

2856:

Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, George W. Bush are all names

2719:

Preferably among these referrals one can pick the most

937:

Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, George W. Bush are all names

3340:

is singled out as a prime instigator of such "events".

1411:أبو الوليد محمد بن احمد بن محمد بن احمد بن احمد بن رشد 999:

Mustafa Kemal Ataturk is the correct and full name. --

652:أبو الوليد محمد بن احمد بن محمد بن احمد بن احمد بن رشد 4166:

Ataturk was in no way affiliated with the YT movement

3311:

having partly Turkish populations since at least the

2375:

Knowledge:Naming conventions (common names)#Examples

4520:and refrain from engaging in such racist attacks.. 4237:

ridiculous!!! lutherian 10:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

3904:than 60 million souls. Very silly reasoning indeed 3389:and even served as the chief administrator of both 3124:

He could either not control all of them effectively

2383://I see no reason to remove this one - I do!--: --> 797:as well, to keep it simple; but not Kemal Atatürk) 1855:on the existence of politically motivated voters: 635:- doesn't really make that much of a difference. — 3377:) who is mentioned captured by Turkish forces on 2463:Every single one of those examples is incorrect. 417:European defeat,is a widely aknowledged leader. 2228:. Now, you still haven't answered my question: 2145:"Kemal Ataturk" -Mustafa -Kemal -wikipedia -.tr 542:Please REDIRECT all articles under the topics: 250:international relations and politics degree so 3803:improve the contents of the article. Also see 2879:any (combination) of these names, I will vote 8: 4234:Ataturk was in no way affiliated with the YT 2422:Those examples are out of date. Currently, 252:I know a bit and actually more than you know 3620:this article is too glorifying of attaturk 3127:Or he made a poor selection of some of them 3074:This is not a debate, conversation is over. 2226:Knowledge:Naming conventions (common names) 1948:Knowledge:Naming conventions (common names) 1517:Knowledge:Naming conventions (common names) 1354:Knowledge:Naming conventions (common names) 924:Knowledge:Naming conventions (common names) 793:is the most accurate name. (It can be just 2814:shows that MKA is a commonly used name. -- 4483:WHEN KEMAL ATATURK RECITED SHEMA YISRAEL 4416:I see this discussion has arrived at the 4340:As Far As I Know, it is a fair question. 4265:, Lutherian. It doesn't serve anything. 2275:(A) "Mustafa Kemal Ataturk": 2,110,000 Gh 1373:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR 1076:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk is more accurate.-- 4512:?? What kind of an edit summary is this 4463: 3995: 509:On this subject, I just wanted to quote 3260:(PS: My mother is still a virgin too!) 2715:(after surname legislation in Turkey.) 2590:another few hours until midnight UTC? 2525:I would object to making specifically 2373:Ha ha, I just read the hidden code in 692:: I think the article should be named 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4369:But surely I like Kinross' thoughts! 4318:What does AFAIK Ataturk mean exactly? 7: 3937:nothing but logical as shown above. 3574:-talk which is largely considered a 1592:I think the article should be named 172:Excuse me, but wasn't he a dictator? 157:. Also stop talking about ideology. 4490:Satanic Voices, Ancient and Modern 3066:Peace in nation, peace in the world 1456:is derived from the latin one, see 4239:That's exactly what you wrote and 443:This is all facinating but as per 24: 3018:murderers) with the standards of 2278:(B) "Kemal Ataturk": 2,620,000 Gh 1266:Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili 1138:There is consensus for a move to 2675:(after having general's rank at 1957: 1458:Alphabets derived from the Latin 29: 3494:Now, now. Let's remain civil. — 2824:In any event, the main article 155:this is not a fabricated theory 3744:20:08, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 3719:18:49, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 3671:16:09, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 3661:21:17, 11 September 2006 (UTC) 3405:Roots of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 171: 1: 4469:Please, do not feed the troll 4001:Please, do not feed the troll 2993:with the IP address below): 1325:You've also already violated 1201:voted support but ths is the 4535:14:46, 15 October 2006 (UTC) 3130:Or he ordered them to do so. 2489:than "Kemal Ataturk" alone? 2436:Anthony Charles Lynton Blair 1969:Knowledge naming conventions 1967:Except where other accepted 4525:09:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 4434:18:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 4425:17:12, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 4374:21:14, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 4345:06:44, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 4270:17:01, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 4257:16:59, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 4248:07:44, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 4177:05:44, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 4083:15:23, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 4041:12:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 3979:10:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 3947:06:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 3909:18:48, 2 October 2006 (UTC) 3883:09:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 3873:18:33, 2 October 2006 (UTC) 3852:17:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC) 3812:19:50, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 3794:19:26, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 3784:18:52, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 2699:Turkish War of Independence 2040:Cross check that it works: 1847:.". Rechecking my previous 1807:Knowledge:Assume good faith 1688:If it's so wrong, why does 1503:name doesn't mean it's the 910:name doesn't mean it's the 530:17:36, 9 October 2006 (UTC) 445:Knowledge:Original research 4551: 4478:. Found this stuff there: 3638:) 22:46, 4 September 2006. 2835:as a redirect to that. -- 2713:Gazi Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 1853:CLEAR AND PRESENT EVIDENCE 1392:18:51, 16 June 2006 (EET) 1306:16:34, 16 June 2006 (EET) 980:, not the far more common 569:16:11, 16 June 2006 (EET) 214:05:35, 9 August 2006 (UTC) 203:05:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC) 187:04:30, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 18:Talk:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 4033:PS. What does AFAIK mean? 3610:21:34, 27 June 2006 (UTC) 3565:20:33, 27 June 2006 (UTC) 3553:20:28, 26 June 2006 (UTC) 3501:20:22, 26 June 2006 (UTC) 3489:20:14, 26 June 2006 (UTC) 3470:22:25, 25 June 2006 (UTC) 3432:19:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 3292:13:42, 23 June 2006 (UTC) 3250:13:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC) 3214:11:04, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 3109:08:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 3055:12:25, 21 June 2006 (UTC) 3004:11:13, 21 June 2006 (UTC) 2981:14:21, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 2926:13:35, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 2915:12:19, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 2870:07:14, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 2849:03:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 2840:02:33, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 2829:William Jefferson Clinton 2819:14:43, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 2800:14:02, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 2744:13:38, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 2642:13:10, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 2598:12:56, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 2585:12:27, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 2545:12:18, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 2521:12:07, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 2477:05:33, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 2468:03:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 2455:23:33, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 2428:William Jefferson Clinton 2417:11:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 2366:12:05, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 2353:11:45, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 2293:10:43, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 2263:11:37, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 2199:09:19, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 2127:08:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 2113:23:52, 18 June 2006 (UTC) 2096:14:17, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 2075:17:29, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 2012:12:00, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 1938:11:29, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 1927:10:24, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 1896:22:00, 18 June 2006 (UTC) 1882:21:41, 18 June 2006 (UTC) 1865:21:29, 18 June 2006 (UTC) 1851:, you'll see it presents 1831:21:21, 18 June 2006 (UTC) 1814:21:17, 18 June 2006 (UTC) 1798:21:09, 18 June 2006 (UTC) 1771:20:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC) 1759:08:35, 18 June 2006 (UTC) 1745:20:57, 18 June 2006 (UTC) 1732:20:40, 18 June 2006 (UTC) 1723:00:06, 18 June 2006 (UTC) 1708:23:41, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 1699:22:02, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 1682:00:05, 18 June 2006 (UTC) 1668:21:56, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 1652:23:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 1635:22:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 1622:11:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 1610:21:27, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 1586:10:27, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 1572:02:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 1563:21:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 1534:23:01, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 1524:19:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 1513:William Jefferson Clinton 1491:22:58, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 1465:18:13, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 1430:17:11, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 1402:15:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 1380:15:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 1361:15:29, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 1345:18:01, 16 June 2006 (EET) 1334:14:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 1319:14:45, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 1288:12:17, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 1278:10:33, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 1256:16:46, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 1229:13:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 1210:08:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 1192:10:19, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1147:22:02, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 1128:09:35, 29 June 2006 (UTC) 1117:04:13, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1106:07:10, 21 June 2006 (UTC) 1093:17:30, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 1081:07:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 1069:18:43, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 1055:17:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 1043:11:29, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 1031:20:53, 18 June 2006 (UTC) 1016:20:55, 18 June 2006 (UTC) 1004:13:41, 18 June 2006 (UTC) 992:12:50, 18 June 2006 (UTC) 969:09:05, 18 June 2006 (UTC) 951:07:22, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 931:19:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 920:William Jefferson Clinton 899:21:58, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 887:20:34, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 875:14:08, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 841:20:11, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 802:19:59, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 782:19:31, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 770:19:19, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 754:02:12, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 740:23:44, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 729:22:50, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 722:22:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 710:21:27, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 671:17:11, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 642:22:06, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 627:16:56, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 610:16:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 587:13:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 260:11:13, 14 June 2006 (UTC) 166:11:04, 14 June 2006 (UTC) 2723:("Atatürk") or the most 1965:This page in a nutshell: 1826:, rather than "GREEK"? — 1299:Objection to oppose move 603:tr:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 489:18:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC) 473:01:36, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 457:19:24, 22 May 2006 (UTC) 431:09:21, 16 May 2006 (UTC) 352:20:48, 15 May 2006 (UTC) 338:20:38, 15 May 2006 (UTC) 301:18:39, 14 May 2006 (UTC) 285:23:48, 13 May 2006 (UTC) 275:21:41, 13 May 2006 (UTC) 240:15:18, 3 June 2006 (UTC) 207:Now that's just nasty. — 132:15:25, 3 June 2006 (UTC) 2695:Gazi Mustafa Kemal Paşa 2022:http://www.google.co.uk 333:Anyway, them's my 2¢. — 229:i give you a citation; 4471: 4003: 3172:which was not enforced 3157:Chrysostomos of Smyrna 2549:But you yourself said 2382: 2306:+Option -Other options 1692:use "Kemal Ataturk"? — 1251:, combining the two?-- 1205:this used has made. -- 1153:Comments on the survey 4514:User:Apocolocynthosis 4467: 3999: 3626:comment was added by 2883:for that option. :-) 2709:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 2448:Mustafa Kemal Ataturk 1547:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 1140:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 962:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 791:Mustafa Kemal Ataturk 763:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 681:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 599:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 560:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 42:of past discussions. 4418:reductio ad Hitlerum 4243:. Bravo. Da Capo! -- 3779:London, 2003, p. 614 2141:said), here you go: 2072:Philip Baird Shearer 1946:Infobox copied from 1511:'s name is actually 1207:Philip Baird Shearer 1144:Eugène van der Pijll 918:'s name is actually 3809:Atilim Gunes Baydin 3716:Atilim Gunes Baydin 3658:Atilim Gunes Baydin 3397:from 1928 to 1930. 2665:(after high school) 1820:User:TigranTheGreat 882:per Bertilvidet. -- 777:per Bertilvidet. -- 631:Changed my vote to 362:OK.Calmly...again: 146:he was %100 Turkish 4516:?? Please go read 4472: 4004: 3845:The Ottoman Empire 3777:The Ottoman Empire 3395:Boeotia Prefecture 3258:religious beliefs! 2691:Gazi Mustafa Kemal 2673:Mustafa Kemal Paşa 2487:uninformed readers 2444:George Walker Bush 2020:Google test using 1916:User:Kertenkelebek 1889:if they wish to be 1450:Franklin Roosevelt 982:Ayatollah Khomeini 765:is identity name. 3654:George Washington 3650:Otto von Bismarck 3646:Winston Churchill 3639: 2986:he was a murderer 2761:There is no cabal 1975: 1974: 1561: 978:Ruhollah Khomeini 810:per Bertilvidet. 511:Sir Percy Loraine 455: 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4542: 4532:Apocolocynthosis 4371:Apocolocynthosis 4263:personal attacks 4245:Apocolocynthosis 4038:Apocolocynthosis 4025:era? He was not 3944:Apocolocynthosis 3880:Apocolocynthosis 3849:Apocolocynthosis 3781:Apocolocynthosis 3621: 3607: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3591: 3550: 3545: 3541: 3537: 3534: 3499: 3467: 3462: 3458: 3454: 3451: 3351:. Their view as 3289: 3284: 3280: 3276: 3273: 3245: 3244: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3238: 3211: 3206: 3202: 3198: 3195: 3180:personal attacks 3120:above) because: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3052: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3036: 2978: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2962: 2912: 2907: 2903: 2899: 2896: 2797: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2781: 2639: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2623: 2582: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2566: 2518: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2502: 2414: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2398: 2350: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2334: 2260: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2244: 2196: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2180: 2009: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1993: 1961: 1960: 1954: 1872:User:Bertilvidet 1721: 1697: 1554: 1454:Turkish alphabet 1417:for Mao Zedong, 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1103: 872: 867: 863: 859: 856: 839: 834: 830: 826: 823: 738: 658:for Mao Zedong, 640: 625: 618:per Bertilvidet. 448: 212: 200:MonsterOfTheLake 109:Benito Mussolini 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4550: 4549: 4545: 4544: 4543: 4541: 4540: 4539: 4506: 4462: 3761: 3622:—The preceding 3618: 3589: 3586: 3584: 3582: 3580: 3532: 3529: 3527: 3525: 3523: 3495: 3449: 3446: 3444: 3442: 3440: 3407: 3271: 3268: 3266: 3264: 3262: 3236: 3234: 3232: 3230: 3228: 3226: 3224: 3223: 3193: 3190: 3188: 3186: 3184: 3094: 3092: 3090: 3088: 3086: 3084: 3082: 3080: 3079: 3034: 3031: 3029: 3027: 3025: 2960: 2957: 2955: 2953: 2951: 2894: 2891: 2889: 2887: 2885: 2779: 2776: 2774: 2772: 2770: 2621: 2618: 2616: 2614: 2612: 2564: 2561: 2559: 2557: 2555: 2500: 2497: 2495: 2493: 2491: 2396: 2393: 2391: 2389: 2387: 2384: 2332: 2329: 2327: 2325: 2323: 2242: 2239: 2237: 2235: 2233: 2178: 2175: 2173: 2171: 2169: 2120: 2110:Septentrionalis 2106: 2094: 1991: 1988: 1986: 1984: 1982: 1958: 1914:I have blocked 1717: 1693: 1649:Septentrionalis 1608: 1452:. Besides, the 1352:I refer you to 1218: 1177: 1175: 1173: 1171: 1169: 1167: 1165: 1163: 1162: 1155: 1136: 1101: 964:is the name. -- 854: 851: 849: 847: 845: 821: 818: 816: 814: 812: 734: 708: 636: 621: 575: 540: 208: 174: 105: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4548: 4546: 4538: 4537: 4505: 4500: 4498: 4495: 4461: 4458: 4457: 4456: 4455: 4454: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4450: 4449: 4448: 4447: 4446: 4445: 4444: 4443: 4442: 4441: 4440: 4439: 4438: 4437: 4436: 4395: 4394: 4393: 4392: 4391: 4390: 4389: 4388: 4387: 4386: 4385: 4384: 4383: 4382: 4381: 4380: 4379: 4378: 4377: 4376: 4368: 4338: 4337: 4336: 4335: 4334: 4333: 4332: 4331: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4327: 4326: 4325: 4324: 4323: 4322: 4321: 4320: 4319: 4297: 4296: 4295: 4294: 4293: 4292: 4291: 4290: 4289: 4288: 4287: 4286: 4285: 4284: 4283: 4282: 4281: 4280: 4279: 4278: 4277: 4276: 4275: 4274: 4273: 4272: 4226: 4224: 4200: 4199: 4198: 4197: 4196: 4195: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4191: 4190: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4186: 4185: 4184: 4183: 4182: 4181: 4180: 4179: 4168:is a mere lie 4143: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4139: 4138: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4130: 4129: 4128: 4127: 4126: 4125: 4124: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4098: 4097: 4096: 4095: 4094: 4093: 4092: 4091: 4090: 4089: 4088: 4087: 4086: 4085: 4058: 4057: 4056: 4055: 4054: 4053: 4052: 4051: 4050: 4049: 4048: 4047: 4046: 4045: 4044: 4043: 4035: 4034: 4031: 4030: 3994: 3993: 3992: 3991: 3990: 3989: 3988: 3987: 3986: 3985: 3984: 3983: 3982: 3981: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3954: 3953: 3952: 3951: 3950: 3949: 3938: 3920: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3915: 3914: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3889: 3888: 3887: 3886: 3885: 3859: 3858: 3857: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3817: 3816: 3815: 3814: 3805:Help:Talk page 3797: 3796: 3763:Lord Kinross, 3760: 3757: 3755: 3753: 3752: 3751: 3750: 3749: 3748: 3747: 3746: 3728: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3723: 3722: 3721: 3701: 3700: 3699: 3698: 3697: 3696: 3676: 3675: 3674: 3673: 3617: 3614: 3613: 3612: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3504: 3503: 3481: 3480: 3473: 3472: 3419: 3406: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3367: 3360: 3341: 3329: 3328: 3321: 3300: 3299: 3295: 3294: 3167: 3166: 3132: 3131: 3128: 3125: 3114: 3113: 3112: 3111: 3058: 3057: 2947: 2946: 2943: 2936: 2929: 2928: 2918: 2917: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2851: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2736: 2717: 2716: 2702: 2680: 2666: 2656: 2645: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2458: 2457: 2379: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2307: 2304: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2279: 2276: 2266: 2265: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2202: 2201: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2151: 2133:(according to 2119: 2116: 2105: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2088: 2068: 2067: 2064: 2055: 2052: 2051: 2048: 2045: 2038: 2037: 2034: 2031: 2028: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 1973: 1972: 1962: 1952: 1951: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1884: 1875: 1859: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1816: 1791:TigranTheGreat 1775: 1774: 1773: 1762: 1761: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1734: 1725: 1685: 1684: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1602: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1413:for Averroes, 1406: 1405: 1404: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1347: 1346: 1337: 1336: 1322: 1321: 1309: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1217: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1195: 1194: 1154: 1151: 1142:; page moved. 1135: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1119: 1108: 1095: 1083: 1071: 1058: 1057: 1045: 1033: 1019: 1018: 1006: 994: 971: 954: 953: 934: 933: 901: 896:TigranTheGreat 889: 877: 804: 784: 772: 756: 744: 743: 742: 712: 702: 687: 674: 654:for Averroes, 644: 629: 612: 591: 590: 574: 571: 562: 561: 554: 553: 550: 547: 539: 538:Suggested move 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 492: 491: 476: 475: 460: 459: 435: 408: 406: 405: 398: 397: 389: 388: 357: 356: 355: 354: 341: 340: 330: 329: 322: 313: 312: 304: 303: 288: 287: 269: 267: 265: 263: 262: 225: 220: 219: 218: 217: 216: 192: 190: 189: 173: 170: 169: 168: 140: 135: 134: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4547: 4536: 4533: 4529: 4528: 4527: 4526: 4523: 4519: 4515: 4511: 4504: 4501: 4499: 4496: 4493: 4491: 4486: 4484: 4479: 4477: 4470: 4466: 4459: 4435: 4432: 4428: 4427: 4426: 4423: 4419: 4415: 4414: 4413: 4412: 4411: 4410: 4409: 4408: 4407: 4406: 4405: 4404: 4403: 4402: 4401: 4400: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4396: 4375: 4372: 4367: 4366: 4365: 4364: 4363: 4362: 4361: 4360: 4359: 4358: 4357: 4356: 4355: 4354: 4353: 4352: 4351: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4347: 4346: 4343: 4317: 4316: 4315: 4314: 4313: 4312: 4311: 4310: 4309: 4308: 4307: 4306: 4305: 4304: 4303: 4302: 4301: 4300: 4299: 4298: 4271: 4268: 4264: 4260: 4259: 4258: 4255: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4246: 4242: 4238: 4235: 4229: 4225: 4222: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4217: 4216: 4215: 4214: 4213: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4209: 4208: 4207: 4206: 4205: 4204: 4203: 4202: 4201: 4178: 4175: 4170: 4169: 4167: 4163: 4162: 4161: 4160: 4159: 4158: 4157: 4156: 4155: 4154: 4153: 4152: 4151: 4150: 4149: 4148: 4147: 4146: 4145: 4144: 4122: 4121: 4120: 4119: 4118: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4108: 4107: 4106: 4105: 4104: 4103: 4084: 4081: 4076: 4075: 4074: 4073: 4072: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4066: 4065: 4064: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4060: 4059: 4042: 4039: 4036: 4032: 4028: 4024: 4020: 4019: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4011: 4010: 4009: 4008: 4007: 4006: 4005: 4002: 3998: 3980: 3977: 3972: 3971: 3970: 3969: 3968: 3967: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3959: 3948: 3945: 3941: 3935: 3934:causa finalis 3931: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3926: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3922: 3921: 3910: 3907: 3902: 3901: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3884: 3881: 3876: 3875: 3874: 3871: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3853: 3850: 3846: 3842: 3840: 3834: 3830: 3826: 3823: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3813: 3810: 3806: 3801: 3800: 3799: 3798: 3795: 3792: 3788: 3787: 3786: 3785: 3782: 3778: 3774: 3772: 3766: 3758: 3756: 3745: 3742: 3737: 3736: 3735: 3734: 3733: 3732: 3731: 3730: 3729: 3720: 3717: 3712: 3707: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3703: 3702: 3694: 3691: 3687: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3677: 3672: 3669: 3664: 3663: 3662: 3659: 3655: 3651: 3647: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3637: 3633: 3629: 3625: 3615: 3611: 3608: 3605: 3601: 3597: 3593: 3577: 3576:pseudoscience 3573: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3563: 3554: 3551: 3548: 3544: 3540: 3536: 3520: 3516: 3512: 3508: 3507: 3506: 3505: 3502: 3498: 3493: 3492: 3491: 3490: 3487: 3479: 3478:User:Dimadick 3475: 3474: 3471: 3468: 3465: 3461: 3457: 3453: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3430: 3425: 3421: 3420:Mother Side: 3417: 3413: 3410: 3409:Father Side: 3404: 3400: 3399:User:Dimadick 3396: 3392: 3388: 3387:antistrategos 3384: 3380: 3376: 3372: 3368: 3365: 3361: 3358: 3354: 3350: 3346: 3342: 3339: 3338:Nikos Sampson 3335: 3334: 3333: 3326: 3322: 3318: 3317:Hellenic Army 3314: 3310: 3306: 3302: 3301: 3297: 3296: 3293: 3290: 3287: 3283: 3279: 3275: 3259: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3216: 3215: 3212: 3209: 3205: 3201: 3197: 3181: 3175: 3173: 3165: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3150: 3146: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3137: 3129: 3126: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3119: 3118:"unwillingly" 3110: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3075: 3071: 3067: 3062: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3056: 3053: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3021: 3017: 3013: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3002: 3001:Kertenkelebek 2997: 2994: 2992: 2988: 2987: 2983: 2982: 2979: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2944: 2941: 2937: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2927: 2924: 2920: 2919: 2916: 2913: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2882: 2878: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2868: 2867:Kertenkelebek 2864: 2859: 2850: 2847: 2844:No it's not. 2843: 2842: 2841: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2827: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2817: 2813: 2809: 2801: 2798: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2768:! So, peace? 2767: 2762: 2757: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2745: 2742: 2741:Kertenkelebek 2737: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2730: 2726: 2725:accurate one 2722: 2714: 2710: 2706: 2703: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2688: 2684: 2681: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2667: 2664: 2660: 2659:Mustafa Kemal 2657: 2654: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2644: 2643: 2640: 2637: 2633: 2629: 2625: 2599: 2596: 2593: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2583: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2552: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2543: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2519: 2516: 2512: 2508: 2504: 2488: 2484: 2478: 2475: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2466: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2456: 2453: 2449: 2445: 2442:redirects to 2441: 2440:George W Bush 2437: 2434:redirects to 2433: 2429: 2426:redirects to 2425: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2415: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2400: 2378: 2376: 2367: 2364: 2361: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2351: 2348: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2320: 2319:Kertenkelebek 2316: 2312: 2308: 2305: 2302: 2301: 2294: 2291: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2277: 2274: 2273: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2264: 2261: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2246: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2222: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2200: 2197: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2165: 2164: 2159: 2155: 2152: 2150: 2146: 2143: 2142: 2140: 2136: 2135:Kertenkelebek 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2125: 2124:Kertenkelebek 2117: 2115: 2114: 2111: 2103: 2097: 2092: 2087: 2086: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2073: 2065: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2058: 2049: 2046: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2035: 2032: 2029: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2013: 2010: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1970: 1966: 1963: 1956: 1955: 1949: 1945: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1936: 1928: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909:Cretanforever 1897: 1894: 1893:Kertenkelebek 1890: 1885: 1883: 1880: 1876: 1873: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1863: 1862:Kertenkelebek 1860: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1832: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1815: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1796: 1795:Kertenkelebek 1792: 1788: 1784: 1779: 1772: 1769: 1768:Kertenkelebek 1764: 1763: 1760: 1757: 1752: 1746: 1743: 1742:Kertenkelebek 1740:again please! 1739: 1735: 1733: 1730: 1729:Kertenkelebek 1726: 1724: 1720: 1715: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1706: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1696: 1691: 1687: 1686: 1683: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1666: 1662: 1653: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1633: 1623: 1620: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1606: 1601: 1600: 1595: 1587: 1584: 1579: 1578: 1573: 1570: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1560: 1557: 1552: 1551:Kemal Atatürk 1548: 1544: 1541: 1540: 1535: 1532: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1492: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1403: 1400: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1391: 1390:Kertenkelebek 1381: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1362: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1344: 1343:Kertenkelebek 1339: 1338: 1335: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1323: 1320: 1317: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1307: 1305: 1304:Kertenkelebek 1300: 1289: 1286: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1276: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1262:Joseph Stalin 1259: 1258: 1257: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1227: 1223: 1215: 1211: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1199:user:Kultigin 1197: 1196: 1193: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1157: 1156: 1152: 1150: 1148: 1145: 1141: 1133: 1129: 1126: 1123: 1120: 1118: 1115: 1112: 1109: 1107: 1104: 1099: 1096: 1094: 1091: 1087: 1084: 1082: 1079: 1075: 1072: 1070: 1067: 1063: 1060: 1059: 1056: 1053: 1049: 1046: 1044: 1041: 1037: 1034: 1032: 1029: 1028:Kertenkelebek 1024: 1021: 1020: 1017: 1014: 1010: 1007: 1005: 1002: 998: 995: 993: 990: 987: 983: 979: 975: 972: 970: 967: 963: 959: 956: 955: 952: 949: 948:Kertenkelebek 945: 940: 936: 935: 932: 929: 925: 921: 917: 913: 909: 905: 902: 900: 897: 893: 890: 888: 885: 881: 878: 876: 873: 870: 866: 862: 858: 842: 840: 837: 833: 829: 825: 809: 805: 803: 800: 796: 792: 788: 785: 783: 780: 776: 773: 771: 768: 764: 760: 757: 755: 752: 748: 745: 741: 737: 732: 731: 730: 727: 723: 721: 717: 713: 711: 706: 701: 700: 695: 691: 688: 686: 685:Cretanforever 683:is the name. 682: 678: 675: 673: 672: 669: 665: 661: 657: 653: 649: 645: 643: 639: 634: 630: 628: 624: 619: 617: 613: 611: 608: 604: 600: 596: 593: 592: 589: 588: 585: 581: 577: 576: 572: 570: 568: 567:Kertenkelebek 559: 558: 557: 552:Kemal Atatürk 551: 549:Mustafa Kemal 548: 545: 544: 543: 537: 531: 528: 523: 522: 521: 520: 519: 516: 512: 507: 503: 500: 496: 490: 487: 486:83.77.131.179 482: 481: 480: 474: 471: 466: 465: 464: 458: 454: 451: 446: 442: 441: 440: 436: 433: 432: 429: 424: 421: 418: 414: 411: 403: 402: 401: 394: 393: 392: 385: 384: 383: 380: 377: 373: 370: 366: 363: 360: 353: 350: 345: 344: 343: 342: 339: 336: 332: 331: 327: 323: 321:(the second). 320: 315: 314: 310: 309: 308: 302: 299: 294: 293: 292: 286: 283: 279: 278: 277: 276: 273: 266: 261: 258: 253: 248: 247: 246: 242: 241: 238: 233: 230: 226: 223: 215: 211: 206: 205: 204: 201: 196: 195: 194: 188: 185: 180: 179: 178: 167: 164: 160: 156: 151: 147: 143: 142: 141: 138: 133: 130: 125: 121: 120: 119: 117: 113: 110: 102: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4509: 4507: 4497: 4494: 4487: 4480: 4473: 4429:Come again? 4339: 4261:Lay off the 4240: 4233: 4231: 4227: 4165: 4026: 4022: 3933: 3919: 3844: 3838: 3836: 3832: 3828: 3824: 3776: 3770: 3768: 3764: 3762: 3754: 3727: 3710: 3685: 3619: 3603: 3599: 3595: 3588: 3571: 3559: 3546: 3542: 3538: 3531: 3482: 3463: 3459: 3455: 3448: 3426: 3422: 3418: 3414: 3411: 3408: 3330: 3325:19th century 3313:11th century 3285: 3281: 3277: 3270: 3222: 3221: 3217: 3207: 3203: 3199: 3192: 3176: 3171: 3168: 3161:Turkish Army 3142: 3133: 3117: 3115: 3078: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3048: 3044: 3040: 3033: 3019: 3015: 3011: 2998: 2995: 2989: 2985: 2984: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2959: 2948: 2939: 2930: 2908: 2904: 2900: 2893: 2880: 2876: 2857: 2855: 2833:Bill Clinton 2825: 2807: 2806: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2778: 2755: 2728: 2724: 2720: 2718: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2694: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2672: 2668: 2662: 2658: 2652: 2646: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2620: 2608: 2578: 2574: 2570: 2563: 2550: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2499: 2486: 2424:Bill Clinton 2410: 2406: 2402: 2395: 2385: 2372: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2331: 2314: 2310: 2282: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2241: 2229: 2219: 2213: 2192: 2188: 2184: 2177: 2158:only 2 hits! 2153: 2144: 2121: 2107: 2083: 2069: 2053: 2039: 2019: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1990: 1964: 1943: 1932: 1919: 1906: 1888: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1777: 1776: 1657: 1645:Ada Lovelace 1640: 1629: 1597: 1591: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1509:Bill Clinton 1504: 1500: 1498: 1483: 1446:John Kennedy 1423:اسماعيل انور 1408: 1407: 1386: 1308: 1298: 1297: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1161: 1160: 1137: 1121: 1110: 1097: 1085: 1073: 1061: 1047: 1035: 1022: 1009:Weak support 1008: 996: 974:Weak support 973: 957: 938: 916:Bill Clinton 911: 907: 903: 891: 879: 868: 864: 860: 853: 835: 831: 827: 820: 807: 806: 786: 774: 758: 747:Support move 746: 715: 714: 697: 689: 676: 664:اسماعيل انور 647: 646: 632: 615: 614: 598: 594: 579: 578: 563: 555: 541: 514: 510: 508: 504: 501: 497: 493: 477: 461: 437: 434: 425: 422: 419: 415: 412: 407: 399: 390: 381: 378: 374: 371: 367: 364: 361: 358: 319:Three Pashas 305: 289: 268: 264: 251: 243: 234: 231: 227: 224: 221: 191: 177:Bolshiviks. 175: 158: 154: 149: 145: 139: 136: 106: 75: 43: 37: 4342:Bertilvidet 3870:Augustgrahl 3807:. Regards, 3791:Augustgrahl 3741:Augustgrahl 3668:Augustgrahl 3357:Demosthenes 3305:Megali Idea 2863:Walker Bush 2315:"Anti-Turk" 2139:Bertilvidet 2118:Move War??? 1980:Thank you. 1924:Mike Rosoft 1736:Also check 1583:Bertilvidet 1505:common name 1486:. Cheers. — 1285:Bertilvidet 1275:Bertilvidet 1226:Bertilvidet 1222:Oppose move 944:Walker Bush 912:common name 584:Bertilvidet 580:Oppose move 527:JohnEmerald 103:Albanian??? 36:This is an 4522:Baristarim 4476:Sabbateans 4474:Check out 4460:References 3767:. ---: --> 3364:Bogomilism 3353:barbarians 2865:". Peace. 2756:more wrong 2721:common one 2669:Kemal Paşa 2527:uninformed 2432:Tony Blair 1787:NikoSilver 1738:Britannica 1690:Britannica 1484:manasızlık 1478:, and now 1419:నాగార్జునా 1216:Discussion 1114:DeliDumrul 1102:Gryffindor 1090:Thumbelina 660:నాగార్జునా 387:beginning. 359:CAN here. 116:Mallaccaos 95:Archive 10 4431:lutherian 4254:lutherian 4228:lutherian 4174:lutherian 4080:lutherian 3976:lutherian 3906:lutherian 3833:NEXT STEP 3379:20 August 3349:Isocrates 3345:Herodotus 3159:) by the 3016:justified 3012:murderers 2877:preferred 2858:preferred 2837:Danny Yee 2729:correctly 2687:Gazi Paşa 2655:(infancy) 2592:Fut.Perf. 2539:Fut.Perf. 2474:Danny Yee 2452:Danny Yee 2360:Fut.Perf. 2287:Fut.Perf. 2057:Diacritic 1783:Hectorian 1705:Danny Yee 1619:Danny Yee 1264:and both 1203:only edit 1078:Hattusili 986:Fut.Perf. 939:preferred 884:Hectorian 799:denisutku 751:Danny Yee 556:to HERE: 87:Archive 6 82:Archive 5 76:Archive 4 70:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 4518:WP:CIVIL 4503:WP:Civil 3843:Kinross 3835:---: --> 3775:Kinross 3636:contribs 3624:unsigned 3515:Sumerian 3497:Khoikhoi 3327:to 1923. 3309:Anatolia 3153:massacre 3070:murderer 2816:A.Garnet 2677:Gelibolu 2531:Informed 2149:806 hits 2104:Move war 1944:Comment: 1935:A.Garnet 1879:Saposcat 1828:Saposcat 1824:Armenian 1811:Saposcat 1756:Saposcat 1719:Khoikhoi 1714:Columbia 1695:Khoikhoi 1665:Matthead 1531:Saposcat 1501:complete 1488:Saposcat 1462:Matthead 1444:, or to 1427:Saposcat 1253:Matthead 1125:BullsEye 1066:Kultigin 1040:A.Garnet 1013:Saposcat 908:complete 736:Khoikhoi 668:Saposcat 638:Khoikhoi 623:Khoikhoi 607:Matthead 597:move to 391:Second: 349:A.Garnet 335:Saposcat 298:A.Garnet 257:Deliogul 237:Deliogul 210:Khoikhoi 163:Deliogul 129:Deliogul 3711:without 3519:Chinese 2940:benefit 2881:support 2831:, with 2812:Encarta 2808:Comment 2705:Atatürk 2697:(after 2653:Mustafa 1920:Support 1661:W. Bush 1641:Comment 1594:Atatürk 1543:Comment 1249:Ilvidet 1122:Support 1111:Support 1098:Support 1086:Support 1074:Support 1062:Support 1052:Poobarb 1048:Support 1036:Support 1023:Support 997:Support 966:Baylan1 958:Support 795:Ataturk 787:Support 759:Support 733:Nice. — 716:Support 694:Atatürk 677:Support 633:support 595:Support 546:Atatürk 400:Third: 184:Nicklob 124:Antalya 39:archive 4241:forgot 4232:AFAIK 4029:evil! 3825:INDRA: 3690:August 3562:Doluca 3511:WP:AGF 3486:Doluca 3429:Doluca 3391:Attica 3225:Kerten 3164:towns. 3145:Smyrna 3081:Kerten 2553:Ergo? 2438:, and 2059:test: 1679:Metb82 1632:Metb82 1480:thrice 1438:Zedong 1270:Stalin 1164:Kerten 1134:Result 904:Oppose 892:Oppose 880:Oppose 808:Oppose 775:Oppose 726:Metb82 720:Metb82 690:Oppose 648:Oppose 616:Oppose 573:Survey 470:Metb82 4422:siafu 4267:siafu 3652:, or 3628:Rm uk 3572:genes 3149:İzmir 3020:their 2923:siafu 2846:siafu 2663:Kemal 2465:siafu 2450:. -- 2221:SHOUT 2085:Benne 1663:". -- 1599:Benne 1569:siafu 1521:siafu 1476:twice 1442:Enver 1399:siafu 1377:siafu 1358:siafu 1331:siafu 1316:siafu 928:siafu 779:Tēlex 767:Memty 699:Benne 428:CAN T 282:Mu5ti 272:CAN T 16:< 4027:THAT 4023:NAZI 3693:2002 3686:what 3632:talk 3616:bias 3393:and 3383:1922 3375:1959 3371:1867 3347:and 2766:LMTO 2683:Gazi 2311:only 2283:only 2091:talk 1922:. - 1849:NOTE 1778:NOTE 1712:And 1605:talk 1549:and 1472:once 1448:and 1440:and 1268:and 1243:and 1241:Ilvi 1237:Bert 705:talk 326:Dada 2711:or 2707:or 2693:or 2689:or 2685:or 2671:or 2661:or 2535:far 1891:." 1822:is 1809:. — 1716:? — 1559:out 1556:Cat 1507:. 1415:毛澤東 1327:3RR 1245:Det 1001:Zey 946:". 914:. 656:毛澤東 453:out 450:Cat 270:.-- 4508:?? 4488:2. 4481:1. 4230:: 3942:] 3878:-- 3648:, 3634:• 3592:il 3581::N 3535:il 3524::N 3452:il 3441::N 3381:, 3373:- 3274:il 3263::N 3231:le 3196:il 3185::N 3174:! 3138:: 3095:k 3087:l 3037:il 3026::N 2963:il 2952::N 2897:il 2886::N 2826:is 2782:il 2771::N 2624:il 2613::N 2567:il 2556::N 2503:il 2492::N 2430:, 2399:il 2388::N 2377:: 2335:il 2324::N 2245:il 2234::N 2181:il 2170::N 2156:: 2147:: 1994:il 1983::N 1793:) 1789:, 1785:, 1647:. 1474:, 1375:. 1356:. 1239:, 1178:k 1170:l 1088:. 960:. 894:-- 857:il 846::N 824:il 813::N 789:. 761:. 679:. 426:-- 91:→ 3841:. 3773:. 3630:( 3606:: 3604:r 3600:e 3596:v 3590:S 3587:o 3585:k 3583:i 3578:. 3549:: 3547:r 3543:e 3539:v 3533:S 3530:o 3528:k 3526:i 3517:/ 3466:: 3464:r 3460:e 3456:v 3450:S 3447:o 3445:k 3443:i 3288:: 3286:r 3282:e 3278:v 3272:S 3269:o 3267:k 3265:i 3237:k 3235:e 3233:b 3229:e 3227:k 3210:: 3208:r 3204:e 3200:v 3194:S 3191:o 3189:k 3187:i 3147:( 3093:e 3091:b 3089:e 3085:e 3083:k 3064:" 3051:: 3049:r 3045:e 3041:v 3035:S 3032:o 3030:k 3028:i 2977:: 2975:r 2971:e 2967:v 2961:S 2958:o 2956:k 2954:i 2911:: 2909:r 2905:e 2901:v 2895:S 2892:o 2890:k 2888:i 2861:" 2796:: 2794:r 2790:e 2786:v 2780:S 2777:o 2775:k 2773:i 2701:) 2679:) 2638:: 2636:r 2632:e 2628:v 2622:S 2619:o 2617:k 2615:i 2595:☼ 2581:: 2579:r 2575:e 2571:v 2565:S 2562:o 2560:k 2558:i 2542:☼ 2517:: 2515:r 2511:e 2507:v 2501:S 2498:o 2496:k 2494:i 2413:: 2411:r 2407:e 2403:v 2397:S 2394:o 2392:k 2390:i 2363:☼ 2349:: 2347:r 2343:e 2339:v 2333:S 2330:o 2328:k 2326:i 2290:☼ 2259:: 2257:r 2253:e 2249:v 2243:S 2240:o 2238:k 2236:i 2195:: 2193:r 2189:e 2185:v 2179:S 2176:o 2174:k 2172:i 2093:) 2089:( 2008:: 2006:r 2002:e 1998:v 1992:S 1989:o 1987:k 1985:i 1950:: 1874:. 1754:— 1607:) 1603:( 1536:) 1176:e 1174:b 1172:e 1168:e 1166:k 989:☼ 942:" 871:: 869:r 865:e 861:v 855:S 852:o 850:k 848:i 838:: 836:r 832:e 828:v 822:S 819:o 817:k 815:i 707:) 703:( 620:— 114:~ 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index