329:
313:
262:
226:
482:
462:
422:
374:
293:
502:
354:
397:
42:
702:
629:
596:
562:
532:
788:
On a second read-through, I actually think the article is better than I first gave it credit for. I'm going to keep the second opinion up for a few days just to see if I can get some outside input, but if you resolve the last comment and no one has offered one by the 26th, I'll pass it without the
858:
Thank you so much! It was in a very bad state a few days back, almost stub. This guy became famous following his international career less than a year ago. Hopefully, he will continue his career from his ongoing career soon. And along with that, this page will gradually increase as well. This is
678:
Sure! The first is the "Early life" section which is a series of similarly structured declarative sentences. It reads more like a list of things than it does a biographical story. I also feel like the "Playing Style" and "Records and
Milestones" adequately cover the topic. Perhaps they could be
740:
I feel like this article needs a lot of work before I'm willing to promote, particularly in regards to criteria one and three. I'm going to ask for a second opinion on whether to hold or not list, but in the mean time, feel free to start addressing the points I raised above.
591:. What's a "bagful of wickets"? "he bumped with Indian batsman" what does bumped mean? While some are wikilinked, I think a number of them could be better described in prose so that readers don't have to constantly click around to understand a biography.
832:
I am convinced the article meets the GA criteria, though I think a good deal of work can and should still be done to get it up to A-class or FA level. I would strongly recommend a
520:
If the comment is numbered, it must be addressed for the article to pass, if it is bulleted, it's an optional suggestion or comment that you don't need to act on right now.
836:
to improve the flow of prose and just as a general copy edit to get more eyes on it than just mine. Still, a quality contribution, and I hope you keep up the good work!
47:
697:"This established him as an opening bowler. Generally, he is very consistent with his line and length." The citation given does not seem to make any mention of this.
527:"he put an impressive performance" impressive feels like weasel word, it should either be a quote or the description of the game be given to avoid neutrality issues.
307:
80:
541:. In the references, there is no description on his performance. So to make it less important, I just changed it to an issue regarding his national selection.
70:
711:. Removed his bowling position as it is not mentioned specifically in any site, though it can be visualized in the bowling scorecards. Here is a example -
658:
I feel like the article isn't "reasonably well written". The prose feels stillted, and I feel like it doesn't fully cover a number of aspects it mentions.
452:
256:
126:
122:
52:
303:
107:
770:. Anyways, more points from the second reviewer on ways to pass GA will be appreciable. I will try copyediting in the interim. Thanks
191:
99:
156:
75:
323:
220:
764:
679:
included in another section? They just feel incredibly short which makes me feel like there may be things not included.
456:
472:
236:
216:
444:
448:
368:
279:
416:
348:
115:
17:
810:
I did the best I could. Created a new section. If you have other queries, please feel free to unveil.
860:
811:
775:
716:
665:
643:
606:
572:
542:
864:
841:
815:
794:
779:
746:
720:
684:
669:
647:
610:
576:
546:
176:
150:
712:
622:
92:
757:
436:
364:
287:
244:
587:
The article isn't clear to someone unfamiliar with cricket, largely because of the use of
522:
When I quote things, you can use ctrl+f to search the page for the specific line I quoted.
195:
853:
837:
833:
805:
790:
771:
742:
680:
661:
387:
240:
172:
146:
476:
252:
248:
761:
868:
845:
819:
798:
783:
750:
724:
688:
673:
651:
639:
614:
580:
550:
180:
160:
588:
212:
756:
I corrected most of the errors picked up by the first reviewer. The on field
605:. Reworded jargon and described unfamiliar glossaries relating cricket.
713:
http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/current/match/817209.html
621:
Records and milestones should probably be written in prose per
167:
Disclaimer: I am a WikiCup participant, as is the nominator.
134:
103:
557:
That paragraph should also probably have a citation.
715:. For his line and length, I put a suitable site.
8:
471:B. Images are provided if possible and are
30:
859:indeed an example of a short article GA.
61:
33:
7:
396:
394:Fair representation without bias:
223:, or spelling and grammar errors:
24:
700:
627:
594:
560:
530:
500:
480:
460:
420:
395:
372:
352:
327:
311:
291:
260:
224:
664:can you show me some examples?
501:
353:
1:
288:appropriate reference section
869:09:27, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
846:16:47, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
820:14:07, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
799:03:27, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
784:13:59, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
751:19:33, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
725:12:41, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
689:03:27, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
674:13:40, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
652:13:33, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
615:13:12, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
581:12:56, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
551:12:41, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
481:
461:
421:
373:
328:
312:
292:
261:
225:
181:16:53, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
161:16:53, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
642:do not follow this policy.
885:
201:
453:valid fair use rationales
440:to illustrate the topic?
638:although articles like
475:to the topic, and have
206:reasonably well written
768:(Relating to cricket!)
18:Talk:Mustafizur Rahman
342:broad in its coverage
324:No original research
275:factually accurate
523:
477:suitable captions
455:are provided for
89:
88:
876:
857:
809:
789:second opinion.
760:is asking for a
707:
704:
703:
634:
631:
630:
601:
598:
597:
567:
564:
563:
537:
534:
533:
519:
504:
503:
484:
483:
464:
463:
457:non-free content
449:copyright status
424:
423:
399:
398:
376:
375:
356:
355:
331:
330:
315:
314:
304:reliable sources
295:
294:
264:
263:
228:
227:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
884:
883:
879:
878:
877:
875:
874:
873:
851:
803:
735:
705:
701:
632:
628:
599:
595:
565:
561:
535:
531:
517:
308:where necessary
239:compliance for
188:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
882:
880:
872:
871:
827:
826:
825:
824:
823:
822:
738:Second opinion
734:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
695:
694:
693:
692:
691:
656:
655:
654:
619:
618:
617:
585:
584:
583:
555:
554:
553:
521:
516:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
499:Pass or Fail:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
469:
468:
467:
443:A. Images are
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
361:
360:
359:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
320:
319:
318:
300:
299:
298:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
249:words to watch
233:
232:
231:
187:
184:
165:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
881:
870:
866:
862:
855:
850:
849:
848:
847:
843:
839:
835:
831:
821:
817:
813:
807:
802:
801:
800:
796:
792:
787:
786:
785:
781:
777:
773:
769:
766:
763:
759:
755:
754:
753:
752:
748:
744:
739:
732:
726:
722:
718:
714:
710:
699:
698:
696:
690:
686:
682:
677:
676:
675:
671:
667:
663:
660:
659:
657:
653:
649:
645:
641:
637:
626:
625:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
604:
593:
592:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
570:
559:
558:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
529:
528:
526:
525:
524:
514:
506:
505:
498:
497:
495:
492:
486:
485:
478:
474:
470:
466:
465:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
441:
439:
438:
432:
426:
425:
418:
414:
413:
411:
407:
401:
400:
393:
392:
390:
389:
384:
378:
377:
370:
369:summary style
366:
362:
358:
357:
350:
349:Major aspects
346:
345:
343:
339:
333:
332:
325:
321:
317:
316:
309:
305:
301:
297:
296:
289:
285:
284:
282:
281:
276:
272:
266:
265:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
229:
222:
218:
214:
211:A. Prose is "
210:
209:
207:
203:
202:
200:
199:
197:
194:review – see
193:
185:
183:
182:
178:
174:
171:Will review.
169:
168:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
829:
828:
767:
762:third umpire
737:
736:
708:
635:
602:
568:
538:
518:
493:
434:
409:
386:
341:
278:
274:
205:
198:for criteria
190:
189:
170:
166:
164:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
834:peer review
640:Virat Kohli
623:WP:USEPROSE
447:with their
219:", without
104:visual edit
286:A. Has an
280:verifiable
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
861:Ikhtiar H
854:Wugapodes
838:Wugapodes
812:Ikhtiar H
806:Wugapodes
791:Wugapodes
776:Ikhtiar H
772:Wugapodes
743:Wugapodes
717:Ikhtiar H
681:Wugapodes
666:Ikhtiar H
662:Wugapodes
644:Ikhtiar H
607:Ikhtiar H
573:Ikhtiar H
543:Ikhtiar H
417:edit wars
302:B. Cites
186:Checklist
173:Wugapodes
147:Wugapodes
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
515:Comments
473:relevant
435:contain
433:Does it
221:copyvios
196:WP:WIAGA
157:contribs
76:Criteria
733:Results
494:Overall
419:, etc:
388:neutral
365:Focused
253:fiction
217:concise
127:history
108:history
94:Article
830:Listed
765:review
758:umpire
589:jargon
451:, and
445:tagged
437:images
410:stable
408:Is it
385:Is it
340:Is it
273:Is it
255:, and
245:layout
204:Is it
636:Done,
367:(see
257:lists
213:clear
136:Watch
16:<
865:talk
842:talk
816:talk
795:talk
780:talk
747:talk
721:talk
709:Done
685:talk
670:talk
648:talk
611:talk
603:Done
577:talk
569:Done
547:talk
539:Done
277:and
241:lead
215:and
177:talk
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
415:No
371:):
363:B.
347:A.
322:C.
237:MoS
235:B.
867:)
844:)
818:)
797:)
782:)
774:.
749:)
723:)
687:)
672:)
650:)
613:)
579:)
571:.
549:)
496::
479::
459::
412:?
391:?
351::
344:?
326::
310::
306:,
290::
283:?
259::
251:,
247:,
243:,
208:?
192:GA
179:)
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
863:(
856::
852:@
840:(
814:(
808::
804:@
793:(
778:(
745:(
719:(
706:Y
683:(
668:(
646:(
633:Y
609:(
600:Y
575:(
566:Y
545:(
536:Y
175:(
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.