241:
played at the FBS level prior to the 2014 season although they have played five FBS opponents prior to the 2014 season and have gone 1-4 against those opponents. Other teams that have always played at the highest level, for example
Michigan, would have all of their games included in their all-time win/loss/tie record as well as all of their years they have fielded a team in their years column since all of those years were at the highest level. This may be difficult to figure out for each team and is not as simple as copying it out of the NCAA pdf but I think it gives a better win/loss/tie and year history of teams playing at the highest level of football which is what this page should be about, rather than the NCAA pdf which lists wins/losses/ties and years when teams are considered "senior colleges" .
283:
or transitioning to it. It does not reflect FBS wins and losses or wins and losses at the highest level . FCS wins shouldn't even count as FBS wins really, but I can see why they're included. It might take a lot of research to figure out which games were won against teams at the highest level but that will give a better representation of who the all-time winningest teams are and the teams with the highest winning percentage. I think I saw Old
Dominion was up there at the top of winning percentage but they don't deserve to be close to teams like Notre Dame, Oklahoma, and Penn State. ODU is a joke compared to those three. To say they have such a great comparable record, or any lowly team like Appalachian State does, is just criminal.
162:
100:
83:
152:
131:
32:
278:
The reason we didn't do that is because this is the team's overall record, as it is listed in the NCAA's official record books. It is hard to calculate team's overall records in FBS unless you know what year they joined FBS, and also what do you do about teams prior to 1976 when there was no division
282:
If you don't want the records to be when teams are FBS teams or teams competing at the highest level why do you title the page 'NCAA Division I FBS football win-loss records?' That title can be misleading because all this page is, is NCAA record book records of teams that are currently in the FBS
304:
I didn't create the page, I started updating it 2 years ago because the stats on the page were outdated and people were using unreliable stats. I just stayed with the name on the page. It does say overall though, I think that would state what the article is about. It is also explained in the intro
240:
I think the win/loss/tie for each team should be their all-time record while playing at the highest level of college football or if they had years not at the highest level of football games can be included against teams playing a the highest level. For example, Old
Dominion has not had any games
279:
between FBS and FCS or I-A and I-AA? It is unfair to list teams recently joining FBS by their FBS record only, and then not doing that to teams that have joined 10 or more years ago. If you would like to do that, please start a different page reflecting teams records as FBS teams. -RhinoSpear79
305:
paragraph. I also agree that the wins outside of the FBS are weak, but the NCAA counts them and the NCAA has the official record. And like I stated earlier, a page could be started showing teams win-loss records in the FBS and since I-A/I-AA was created. -RhinoSpear79
458:
The initial sort of this page is by winning percentage, not overall wins. The page is adjustable in order to see different comparisons such as overall wins or losses or ties, winning percentage, conference affiliation, or teams in alphabetical order.
313:
I recently updated the stats to the end of the 2022 football season. All the conferences are aligned for the 2023 football season. I also added a rank for the first column that allows users to see where teams rank.
322:
The source I use for this site is the NCAA official records. I do not use the
College Football Data Warehouse due to the amount of differences between that and the official NCAA records.
505:
208:
218:
355:
67:
510:
500:
184:
495:
358:
article, arbitrarily cutting of the list at 10, and the lack of third party references justifying the use of a top 10, the article seems to violate
75:
175:
136:
263:
I believe that the records should just be from when the teams were FBS teams, and not including when they were FCS teams playing FBS teams.
248:
432:
Is there a way to have it automatically calculate the win % using a formula based on Wins/Losses/Ties ?? That would save lots of time.
290:
475:
439:
421:
338:
366:. The article also seems unnecessary as it is duplicating information from this article and therefore seem very close to violate
479:
447:
425:
395:
342:
298:
272:
256:
111:
58:
252:
17:
294:
167:
471:
443:
417:
334:
117:
47:
463:
435:
409:
326:
286:
244:
391:
183:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
31:
467:
413:
375:
330:
268:
180:
62:
161:
387:
383:
371:
367:
489:
379:
363:
359:
264:
382:, once this article is updated, and making the tables comprehensive, to adhere to
157:
42:
151:
130:
405:
The win percentage in this article is (Wins + .5(Ties))/(Total Games).
378:. It seems ideal to merge with this article, as opposed to send it to
51:
column on 11 October 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
93:
26:
81:
179:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
356:College football's ten most victorious programs
18:Talk:NCAA Division I football win-loss records
39:NCAA Division I FBS football win–loss records
8:
236:New way to calculate win/loss/tie and years?
284:
125:
99:
97:
506:High-importance college football articles
354:Because of the arbitrary nature of the
127:
76:Knowledge:Recent additions/2007/October
193:Knowledge:WikiProject College football
511:WikiProject College football articles
196:Template:WikiProject College football
74:A record of the entry may be seen at
7:
501:List-Class college football articles
173:This article is within the scope of
116:It is of interest to the following
25:
82:
160:
150:
129:
98:
30:
496:Knowledge Did you know articles
213:This article has been rated as
273:05:33, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
257:02:31, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
1:
401:Calculation of Win Percentage
187:and see a list of open tasks.
71:by total wins and percentage?
448:14:18, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
299:06:50, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
176:WikiProject College football
309:Updated for the 2022 Season
527:
480:05:18, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
426:05:18, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
343:05:18, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
219:project's importance scale
396:19:04, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
212:
199:college football articles
145:
124:
41:appeared on Knowledge's
168:College football portal
68:most victorious program
106:This article is rated
87:
85:
59:Michigan Wolverines
112:content assessment
88:
483:
466:comment added by
438:comment added by
429:
412:comment added by
346:
329:comment added by
301:
289:comment added by
247:comment added by
233:
232:
229:
228:
225:
224:
92:
91:
16:(Redirected from
518:
482:
460:
450:
428:
406:
345:
323:
259:
201:
200:
197:
194:
191:
190:College football
181:college football
170:
165:
164:
154:
147:
146:
141:
137:College football
133:
126:
109:
103:
102:
101:
94:
84:
63:college football
34:
27:
21:
526:
525:
521:
520:
519:
517:
516:
515:
486:
485:
461:
456:
433:
407:
403:
352:
324:
320:
311:
242:
238:
215:High-importance
198:
195:
192:
189:
188:
166:
159:
140:High‑importance
139:
110:on Knowledge's
107:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
524:
522:
514:
513:
508:
503:
498:
488:
487:
455:
452:
402:
399:
351:
348:
319:
316:
310:
307:
276:
275:
249:208.87.144.181
237:
234:
231:
230:
227:
226:
223:
222:
211:
205:
204:
202:
185:the discussion
172:
171:
155:
143:
142:
134:
122:
121:
115:
104:
90:
89:
79:
73:
72:
35:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
523:
512:
509:
507:
504:
502:
499:
497:
494:
493:
491:
484:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
453:
451:
449:
445:
441:
437:
430:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
400:
398:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
349:
347:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
317:
315:
308:
306:
302:
300:
296:
292:
291:24.115.171.60
288:
280:
274:
270:
266:
262:
261:
260:
258:
254:
250:
246:
235:
220:
216:
210:
207:
206:
203:
186:
182:
178:
177:
169:
163:
158:
156:
153:
149:
148:
144:
138:
135:
132:
128:
123:
119:
113:
105:
96:
95:
80:
77:
70:
69:
64:
60:
57:... that the
56:
53:
52:
50:
49:
44:
40:
36:
33:
29:
28:
19:
468:RhinoSpear79
462:— Preceding
457:
454:Initial sort
440:67.149.74.32
431:
414:RhinoSpear79
408:— Preceding
404:
353:
331:RhinoSpear79
325:— Preceding
321:
312:
303:
285:— Preceding
281:
277:
243:— Preceding
239:
214:
174:
118:WikiProjects
66:
55:Did you know
54:
48:Did you know
46:
38:
37:A fact from
434:—Preceding
490:Categories
376:WP:BOOSTER
108:List-class
388:CrazyPaco
318:Citations
86:Knowledge
43:Main Page
476:contribs
464:unsigned
436:unsigned
422:contribs
410:unsigned
339:contribs
327:unsigned
287:unsigned
245:unsigned
384:WP:NPOV
372:WP:Spam
368:WP:NOTE
265:Kobra98
217:on the
45:in the
374:, and
364:WP:POV
114:scale.
362:and
360:WP:OR
350:Merge
472:talk
444:talk
418:talk
392:talk
335:talk
295:talk
269:talk
253:talk
209:High
61:are
380:AfD
65:'s
492::
478:)
474:•
446:)
424:)
420:•
394:)
386:.
370:,
341:)
337:•
297:)
271:)
255:)
470:(
442:(
416:(
390:(
333:(
293:(
267:(
251:(
221:.
120::
78:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
