1385:
the continuation of the old club's history. It was founded by the fans, old
Olimpija's players and the parents of children that were playing in the youth systems of the club that was being dissolved. And let me go back to the fans. What makes a football/soccer club? It's the fans. The fans are the soul of the club, and the fact that the fans of the old Olimpija were there at the foundation of NK Bežigrad and have been there to support it ever since, make this "new" club the same club as the club that was dissolved more than 10 years ago. Now, let's go to the media part. Not only do the foreign media regard the new club the same as the old club, the Slovenian media do it as well, for the most part. Not to mention even UEFA and FIFA regard the new club the same as the fans of the club do. The new club is the continuation of the original club. And it should be regarded the same on the wikipedia.
1076:
among them NK Triglav as its entities (that was a common sports organization type in
Yugoslavia). That actually happened, but little later, Triglav joined the Olimpija sports society at the time when the club was renamed to ANK Olimpija (january 1962 i think). However, i agree that the prewar period should not be counted as a history of Olimpija, but I'm not so sure if the 1946 is the correct year. 16. september 1946 was used as the founding of FD Svoboda, but that is false, since Svoboda played in leagues earlier that year and even in the fall 1945. The other option was 20. 8. 1945 when FD Udarnik was founded. Svoboda than merged with Udarnik in 1946/47 winter pause. So, I thuink that 1945 is the correct version in both cases, either Svoboda, either Udarnik. Also, most of the sources from SFRJ uses 1945 as founding year.
1465:
different environments here. Almost all russian clubs I know (Alania
Vladikavkaz, Rotor Volgograd and many many others) are considered as one club with one article, while it seems that its stricker for western teams from Spain for instance (ALmeria, Extremadura...). Slovenia is in central Europe and I understand it's not clear there. But i must atest that, firstly, no Slovenian club is older then 1970s', because they became new legal subjects then with the changes in sport system, and also even more no club can be older than 1945, when all sport was legaly organized in totally new way, and seconly, whatever will be decided, must be then a rule for all the other clubs in Slovenia.
1808:
breach of rules and still is today. It is my understanding that officials of the defunct
Olimpija never even tried to resolve the matter and they knew the club will fold and be dissolved months before the season ended. "Bežigrad" was then established, whilst the league was still playing with Olimpija as one of the active members. So we have two different clubs that existed during the same period of time and the fact that the current Olimpija (ex-Bežigrad) on its own has made officials statements that they are not the same legal entity and connected in any way with the defunct Olimpija is making this debate of a merger pointless. Regards,
1589:
changed the club's name from "NK GORICA" to "ND GORICA" in 2003, they even won the league in 2004, so how would this be possible if they were the new club, you cant just establish a new club and start in the 1st division. The easiest solution is to keep
Olimpija articles seperate (becasue they are both big and well sourced), and merge those small clubs with 2 articles as they are just stubs with couple of words (nk naklo, nk piran, maybe nk ljubljana and several others), BUT it should clearly be written that the club was established again, both in the lead section and in the infobox in "Founded" section
646:
info, but I know that one by myself), but only in lower tiers of
Slovenian football, part of which was the club at the time (and still is). His venture in Železničar was more of a recreational type as the leagues the club played in was (and still is) on amateur level. I have made adjustment in the article about Djurovski and have deleted the info that he played for old NK Olimpija and removed the category about NK Olimpija players. I will also remove him from the list of notable former players in the article about the old NK Olimpija (1911-2004).
916:
one of three clubs in first division (the other two being NK Mura and NK Ljubljana) that were dissolved at the end of the same year. The
Slovenian FA then had to decide what to do. Either to kick all three clubs out after the season was already in progress and therefore finish the season with seven clubs (which would efectivelly meant that the league would not be eligible to participate in UEFA competitions the next season), or to exceptionally allow the three teams to finish the season which they started. Lp,
1434:. In the heart of the fans of old Salzburg football team, are the titles of the past, but we do not give the titles of the past in new SV Austria Salzburg. The difference is that the FC Red Bull Salzburg does not defunct yet and the media does not connecting the old team with new. If we want to be objective, all these should be presented in article. I proposed the example of Montreal Impact and if it is acceptable from the WP:FOOTY, it can proceed. --
190:
169:
200:
33:
1578:
also dissolved of course). 99% percent of slovenian prewar clubs had huge debts and none paid them off as they all become new legal subjects. Similar, but less radical happened in 1970s. I'm just saying if "legality" and "debt" are the main arguments, then no club can be older than 1945 at least. All-time table is also a funny argument as it has ŠD Naklo there. So I propose then we merge
1778:
did in 2003 was totally legal, club can go bankrupt. It was also legal what Gorica did in 2003, but I think it was illegal what NZS did (letting them play in 1st league). Im just asking who is relevant in deciding when two different legal subject are one club and when two? So far I see no valid arguments against the merger (or for it), just gibberish about debt and bankrupcy.
875:
the only two clubs that I know of which officially regarded as older than 1945 in
Yugoslavia were Hajduk and Željezničar the FSJ probably considered Olimpija to have been founded in 1945 or 1946 as Enotnost, which would mean that they (like Dinamo for example) had spent 46 years claiming that their foundation year was 1945. Are there any Olimpija almanacs available to consult?
85:
64:
1747:) that recognizes a number of clubs as founded prior to 1945 so this debate is irrelevant. Also, what was happening in 1945 (change of political system after WWII) and 1976 (Portorož accords) has nothing to do with clubs going bankrupt. Especially in 1976 it was politics trying to meddle with sports, but ultimately failed. In any case, I thought we are discussing
1708:
of sports clubs in the city of
Maribor) but that's merely a honorific connection and again has nothing to do with the dissolved football club Branik Maribor. What Gorica did (and a number of other clubs, including the defunct Olimpija one time during 1990s) prior to 2004 was at the time legal. If it was ethical its another matter.. What the defunct Olimpija,
95:
534:
play in first league with the classification from the 2. MNZ Ljubljana all the way to winning the second tier championship 2. SNL in 2008/09 season and had completed licesing conditions to compete in First league. All that is clear from the archive of statistical data on our official web site - NK Olimpija
Ljubljana has had one (1) season in First division.
1833:
clubs did. We have two different Goricas that existed during the same period of time (from 3.7.2003 untill today) and the fact that the current Gorica (ND) made official statements that they are not the same legal entity and connected in any way with the defunct Gorica, when they had to pay former players after 2003. I'm ending this debate.
870:
does not make sense when attributing trophies is concerned - expecially for the pre-1936 period when Ilirija and Primorje were city rivals and which both won Slovenian regional titles before they merged into SK Ljubljana, which itself became defunct four years later - because the Honours section lists trophies won by both Ilirija, Primorje
495:
793:
tournament and appeared in rounds which contained 32 and 16 teams respectively and that's what is relevant here. Calling it "first round" or "second round" does not mean anything to the reader alone but it could be mentioned together with the explanation such as "First Round (Round of 32)" or "Round of 32 (First Round)".
527:
ligi priigralo z uvrstitvijo iz 2. lige MNZ Ljubljana vse do prvaka 2. SNL v sezoni 2008/09 in je izpolnilo licenčne pogoje za tekmovanje v Prvi ligi. Vse to je razvidno tudi iz arhivskih statističnih podatkov na naši uradni spletni strani - NK Olimpija Ljubljana ima za seboj eno (1) sezono v Prvi ligi.
1777:
You know very well that no one (except me) will discuss about Gorica, Ljubljana etc. so I'm discussing here. But OK, about Olimpija, it is totally irrelevant if the club went bankrupt. The relevant part is that club was one legal entity and then became another, no mather for what cause. What Olimpija
1707:
was founded later on, however, they never claimed any connection with Branik (or SSK). Whilst Maribor was heading in its own direction Branik was trying (and did) to establish a new club but after years they dissolved that one as well. Today Maribor is a member of "Branik" sports society (as are most
1577:
Why is the notion about 1945 laughable? Legally it is the same, sportspeople of old club let's say SK Olimp Celje founded in 1945 new legal subject FD Olimp Celje or whatever, they were new legal entity and never payed old debts from old club to varios entrpises from Kingdom of Yugoslavia (which were
1557:
stats are tracked as one). The defunct Olimpija never even tried to resolve their debt and Bežigrad was established when it was clear that Olimpija will fold (as someone mentioned). This was done couple of years after a new legislation was passed, especially to prevent such cases of malversation. How
1384:
Both clubs have absolutely not existed in the same time for some years, as you say. While it may be true that both clubs existed in the same time for about a month, NK Bežigrad was founded only after the realization of what was about to happen to the old club. It was founded solely for the purpose of
1015:
Olimpija claimed to have been the successor of Enotnost who was supposedly the direct successor ot SK Ljubljana (name of the football club after the merger of Ilirija and Primorje in 1936 and who operated until the outbreak of WWII). According to Olimpija, Enotnost was renamed to Odred in 1948 and to
915:
I moved the article because there were still some confusion regarding the two (old and new). I see no harm in doing that and I believe that 2004 is correct. Officialy that is the year when the club was dissolved. The reason why it was allowed to finish the season was because Olimpija was at the time,
869:
Yes, the story of their pre-war days is rather dubious. When I expanded the article a while ago it became apparent that Olimpija seems to have claimed lineage to just about any club which existed in Ljubljana before 1945. This is not totally unfounded I guess because there were many mergers - but it
645:
He did play for Maribor and even scored 8 1.SNL goals in the process and the info on 1.SNL website is correct. About 2 matches played for NK Ljubljana it looks like he played them as a late substitution (it seems one was even against Olimpija). For NK Železničar Maribor he also played (dont have the
1607:
For Gorica... It was possible, you could have established new club and start in 1st division back then. How ask NZS. They didn't change name, they were new club and they did NOT pay old debts (one of reasons how they won the league). If the president of ND Gorica was in court, he would say the same
851:
that is called ND Ilirija 1911 who recently (9 May) had a celebration of its centennial year. Acording to them Olimpija is illegally claiming their history, which they will prove in a new book that will soon be published and will contain all of the information regarding Ilirija from 1911 to present
533:
30/6/2010 The association of 1. SNL treats NK Olimpija Ljubljana as according the applicable laws of Republic of Slovenia and in the same way as the registration of the association/club was carried out by state authorities - that is as legal entity/organization, founded in 2005 who won its right to
874:
SK Ljubljana - none of which existed during WWII and none of which was re-established following it. 1946 is probably right technically but if the club claimed 1911 (as seen on the club crest) then more reliable sources are needed to make the verdict. I wonder what UEFA's yearbook has to say. Since
526:
30/6/2010 Združenje 1. SNL obravnava NK Olimpija Ljubljana tako, kot veleva veljavna zakonodaja Republike Slovenije in tako kot so v zvezi z registracijo omenjenega društva postopali državni organi - torej kot pravno osebo/društvo, ustanovljeno leta 2005, ki si je tekmovalno pravico nastopa v Prvi
1832:
I agree it's getting pointless. What Olimpija did is of course not ilegal. Who will go to jail? Gliha? Remih? No laws changed, only people in NZS, along with UEFA pressure with licences and other things. You can say whatever you like, but legally it's just the same what Gorica and dozens of other
1668:
Well, I agree in part, the Ilirija part is dubious at least. Still, the 2005 situation is not much different of something many clubs did in the past. I'm pretty sure Maribor would do the same, if they started in lowest league and didn't steal a position from Železničar. However, I still wouldn't
1582:
articles, if prvaliga all-time table is such a relevant source. I have slso seen another all-time tabe, that lists "both" Muras and Olimpijas together. It's from Sportske Novosti 27.12.2013 and I can scan it. To sum up, alost all clubs did the same in one time or another, but because Olimpija is
1464:
For me the main question is, what the wikipedia articles are about or better, what exactly is the "club". Is it primary a legal subject (question of law) or sports society (question of culture)? The answer on this will help me decide. To me it seems that the problem is being dealt differently in
1075:
No, you understand the 1961 Večer article false. It doesn't mean that NK Olimpija and NK Triglav then existed as two separate clubs, but that the AŠZ Olimpija, ZŠD Olimpija, AŠD Olimpija or however it was clled back then, acedimic society(!) of sport clubs, would incorporate several sport clubs,
1807:
No. What Gorica did was legal according to the laws and rules at the time (couple of other clubs, including Olimpija once, did the same prior to Gorica). Laws and rules changed and what Olimpija, Ljubljana and Mura did or tried to do during and after 2004–05 season was at the time illegal and a
1588:
Because Olimpija is by far most media-covered and known Slovenian club that went bankrupt, no one (media/people) really cares about Naklo and other irrelevant teams from lower divisions, and about Gorica, they never went bankrupt and played in the 1st division all the time since 1991, they just
1558:
would this be resolved and treated if they did the same move perhaps in the 1990s or early 2000s is debatable, but at the end irrelevant. The notion that there are no clubs in Slovenia that were established prior to 1976 (Portorož accords) and 1945 is laughable. Also, if something is written on
1469:
for instance became new legal subject in 2003 and therefore also needs two articles. It has two different registration numbers in all oficial Slovenian Football Association documents and also has 2003 foundation date on official Slovenian Football Association website. I don't really care for
792:
No, because there are currently 48 teams playing in the group stage so by analogy it would have to be "Round of 48". But since the group stage is not played in a knock-out format it wouldn't be called a "round" either. For comparison, on both of these occasions Olimpija played in a knock-out
1562:
website it doesn't mean that is the official stance of the organization towards the matter. UEFA has local correspondents who deal with local subjects on their website. In any case, the organization is not above the legislation and rules of countries and local entities. Regards,
1330:
was founded whilst the dissolved Olimpija was still in existence and was a member of the top division, playing their final league match on 28 May 2005 against Celje, before effectively ceasing all operations without even trying to acquire a competition license for the next
743:
I disagree. The rounds in question did in fact consist of 32 and 16 clubs respectively. What was known then and now as "first round" has changed considerably, but the fact of the matter remains that Olimpija was in the final 32 and 16 teams in those competitions.
558:
No, there is no link. This was the email I have received from Mr. Grega Sever who is the official PR for the Slovenian First league (1. SNL - Prva liga), that is Združenja prvoligašev. If in doubt the information can easily be confirmed by sending an email to
1942:
Thanks for comment. Well yes, it's a simialr case to Piacenza (Olimpija got rights from Academic Sports Society to use the name). It is problem in Slovenia, that there is no clear rule like that of NOIF, so obtaining a sports title depends on a free will of
1041:
daily newspaper) where he is, again, appaled by the unilaterally appropriated and claimed history of his club. He also mentiones that in 2001 Ilirija celebrated their 90th year and that during that year there was no celebration of its kind at Olimpija.
996:). In reality, the two clubs even competed in the same leagues long after Ilirija was supposedly dissolved, that is when it supposedly "became" Olimpija. Ilirija and Olimpija competed in the same league twice during their history (first time in
1669:
oppose 1919 if the club was claiming it. It is a complicated question and I would like to see more opinions. For me questions are "what is a club" and "who is relevant in deciding that". Law? Federation (which)? Fans? Media? Club itself?
1909:(the former bankrupted, restructured and closed its football activities, which grant the latter (and few more), a club relocated from nearby town the rights to use the name.), but feel free to suggest a general resolution , as i observed
1720:
was against the rules and laws and thus not permitted (ps: the "successor" clubs of Ljubljana and Mura bankrupted and folded as well couple of years after they were established in 2005). Same goes to all other dissolved clubs. Regards,
1369:
Reliable sources are showing them as combined. I note the Irish source above is different but that was 4 years ago - over time newly-formed teams can come to be regarded as the same as the original club to all intents and purposes.
1755:
merger, aren't we? The overwhelming majority seems to be against the merger so far, with arguments to support it. If we are going to debate other matters and different clubs, shouldn't we move the discussion elsewhere (for example
1029:
Here is also the link of Večer article from 27 January 1961 where it says that Triglav is having difficulties and is likely to be dissolved. The article is interesting because it also mentions couple of football clubs from
1521:
I agree. But the link you posted has only one Olimpija (that of 2005) and no sign of the second one. However it also has only one Gorica, that of 2003, which is then also a new fake club that never repaid old debths.
1608:
as Olimpija, that the are legally new club. My statement stays that we must do the same for Olimpija, Gorica, Piran, Naklo or whatever club, for media coverage and people I don't care, for me they are all the same.
1645:
too, its just a little difference, maribor is a normal club and they admitted that they went bankrupt and started again in 1960, unlike that plastic mafia-owned club called olimpija, which claims all history of
1235:
Whilst it may technically be a new club legally, it's about how the sources refer to them, and UEFA combine the European records of both clubs into one without differentiating and with no reference to Bezigrad.
1059:
I think that the history section of Olimpija prior to 1960 should be removed from this article because it is factualy inaccurate and false. The dissolved Olimpija was founded either in the late 1960 or early
1947:. We have diferent legal subjects that in one case obtain the titles and in other don't. This practice changed around 2004 (most of clubs before 2004 have obtained titles), as I said with pressure from UEFA.
954:, Ilirija still exists today, never folded and their foundation year is 1911 (again, according to the Slovenian Football Association who is the governing body of Slovenian football; link to the reference
1650:
and other clubs, those two olimpija teams are legally not the same just like in maribor case, just because they tried to steal and change history it doesnt mean it should be like that on wikipedia
912:
Do you believe, or rather, do you know of any reliable sources on how were the clubs and their foundation years treated by the FSJ (governing body of Yugoslav footbal until 1991)? Officialy I mean.
1026:). I think that this source clearly shows that during the early 1961 Triglav and Olimpija existed during the same period of time and therof can not be the same club that just changed its name.
882:
to its present title. Is the end date really relevant to disambiguate it from the present-day club? And if they played until the end of the 2004-05 season then shouldn't it say 2005 instead?
1507:, in "Ljubljana" section), the old club simply went bankrupt and was established again to start again (and this new fake club never repaid old debts from 2004 which are still there)
1539:: Olimpija Ljubljana (ex-Bežigrad) has made official public statements that they are a different legal entity and are not, by any means, connected with Olimpija Ljubljana (defunct) (
468:
1023:). However, on 15 Janaury 1961 Triglav lost most of their players and in this article Večer reporter is speculating if any of those players will join, a new club, Olimpija (source:
630:
article lists him as playing for NK Maribor and NK Železničar Maribor, which is probably correct). I cannot find any source which says he ever appeared for the old Olimpija.
1274:), but we have two articles for the old Inpact and for new Inpact. That happens maybe because the MLS is a separate league without connetion with other leagues (NASL etc.).
1016:
Triglav in 1961. Supposedly Triglav was then renamed to Olimpija and this is the "life line" for Olimpija claim of the history from 1911 onwards. Here is the link to the
317:
1860:
to obtain a sports title. They are two companies but due to the sports title was officially granted from Italian FA, they are in a continuum. What it may comparable was
2199:
2195:
2181:
2059:
2055:
2041:
465:
584:
Are there any reliable references that confirm that Djurovski was part of this team and played for them in first league? The only thing I found about him is on
728:, didn't qualify on. Today, when a club officialy reaches the Round of 16 in European competitions it means that it has managed to progress out of group stage.
456:
256:
151:
1917:
are merged into one, due to the liquidator, just grant Piacenza Calcio 1919 (former Libertaspes) to use the brand name, but not obtained the sports title.
323:
660:
PS. I think there were more players that, at some point in their career, played for the club and were capped on full internatinoal level. For example,
2308:
2293:
724:
of the Champions league wheres the main event didn't even start until later stages (groups), the ones that Olimpija, with their 7–0 aggregate loss to
445:
246:
141:
770:
Sure, tehnically. And every club that once played or today qualifies in the group stage of the Champions League or Europa League can call themself a
562:
with questions about NK Olimpija (est. 2005) connections with NK Olimpija (est. 1911) and their heritage and how are they treated by the same league.
1583:
listed two times on one all-time table, then we musst have two articles. For me that agument is certainly not enough. 23:41, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
2313:
2256:
1208:
622:, which is a reliable source for all the players who ever appeared for Yugoslavia, Milko Đurovski only played a single game for NK Bežigrad (e.g.
301:
1894:
2303:
2298:
2288:
1760:
1001:
997:
717:
689:
222:
117:
460:
509:
1009:
2265:
1834:
1785:
1676:
1615:
946:, this is clearly not the case as we can see in this example: both clubs playing in the same league during this (and many more) season;
841:
until 2004–05 season and the dissolution of the club. On the 1. SNL official website the foundation year of the club is listed as 1946 (
701:
619:
1906:
1651:
1590:
1508:
942:. Even though Olimpija Ljubljana claimed they were successors of Ilirija which, according to Olimpija, was disbanded at the start of
693:
416:
1294:
947:
383:
1757:
213:
174:
108:
69:
1944:
1930:
1877:
1744:
1543:
1500:
1408:
1179:
2119:
1983:
1748:
1286:
1193:
1136:
1717:
1005:
44:
2147:
1121:
990:
951:
326:
344:
1970:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
437:
1752:
1313:
1278:
1189:
1140:
1050:
879:
623:
591:), which is the reference that I find very reliable when it comes to stuff about 1.SNL. The website clearly states that
505:
441:
1452:- looks to be two separate clubs who have the same name. The fact that a few sources gets them mixed-up is irrelevant.
1542:). Whoever established Bežigrad and for what purpose is irrelevant. The legislation of Slovenia, and the rules of the
1259:) as one club. Not separate. Fiorentina begin the season 2002–03 from Serie C2, not from the lowest division of Italy.
100:
1152:
1551:
1496:
2198:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2058:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2257:
https://www.rtvslo.si/sport/nogomet/1-slovenska-nogometna-liga-2004-05/olimpija-obstaja-le-se-na-papirju/106944
50:
32:
2269:
1838:
1789:
1680:
1619:
397:
2273:
2261:
2245:
2105:
1956:
1937:
1884:
1842:
1817:
1793:
1781:
1772:
1730:
1684:
1672:
1659:
1623:
1611:
1598:
1572:
1531:
1516:
1483:
1459:
1443:
1420:
1394:
1379:
1364:
1345:
1306:
1268:). Bezigrad begin the season 2005–06 in the lowest division of Slovenian football as absolutely a new club.
1249:
1230:
1168:
1125:
1069:
966:
925:
903:
861:
814:
787:
765:
737:
673:
655:
640:
612:
571:
553:
1857:
1655:
1594:
1512:
1456:
1290:
1204:
1020:
daily newspaper from 23 December 1960, which confirms that Odred was in fact renamed to Triglav (source:
989:, however, Ilirija never folded and is still officialy regarded as the club established in 1911 (source:
661:
2237:
2217:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2205:
2097:
2077:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2065:
1547:
1282:
1262:
Rangers F.C. begin the 2012–13 season from the third division, not from the lowest division of Scotland.
1144:
830:
391:
221:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
116:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1550:, do not permit what they did and supposedly desire. On the all-time table and stats for the PrvaLiga (
1240:
is an example of where a club went bankrupt and reformed but the article combines both clubs into one.
339:
1355:
Both clubs existed in same time for some years, and that is why we should keep the articles separted.
589:
2172:
2032:
1923:
1910:
1870:
1427:
1360:
1148:
893:
804:
755:
548:
449:
113:
1257:
1212:
501:
370:
17:
1431:
1390:
1017:
330:
1553:) we can see that the two teams stats record are kept separate (for example, the above mentioned
1492:
1115:
1046:
1038:
626:) in the 2005–06 season (mind you, it does not list him as ever playing for Maribor although the
333:
2202:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2062:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1435:
1412:
1337:
1298:
1222:
421:
2218:
2078:
2129:
1993:
1952:
1902:
1813:
1768:
1726:
1700:
1638:
1568:
1527:
1479:
1453:
1375:
1245:
1164:
1081:
1065:
962:
921:
857:
783:
733:
669:
651:
627:
608:
592:
567:
2233:
2093:
1540:
1049:
daily newspaper is stating that the year 1911 is not the foundation year of the current/new
425:
402:
2225:
2085:
1156:
1045:
An article from September 2012 with a short history of Ljubljana football. The reporter of
2148:
http://web.archive.org/web/20100413030943/http://www.nkolimpija.com:80/?page=club&id=3
2137:
2001:
1918:
1914:
1865:
1647:
1439:
1416:
1356:
1341:
1302:
1226:
1175:
883:
794:
745:
631:
539:
431:
375:
364:
205:
2184:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
2044:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1898:
1634:
1386:
1237:
379:
352:
2224:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2191:
2084:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2051:
2282:
2151:
2011:
1901:(Czech one was way more complex). I suggested left it as two page article, just like
1111:
406:
1266:
1054:
1037:
As for the newer sources; A public protest by the chairman of Ilirija (published in
1948:
1861:
1809:
1764:
1722:
1709:
1564:
1523:
1475:
1471:
1371:
1241:
1160:
1110:
The result of this discussion was to keep articles separate per consensus below...
1077:
1061:
958:
943:
917:
853:
779:
729:
665:
647:
604:
600:
563:
1196:, while UEFA presents the history of old Olimpija for Bezigrad/Olimpija, like the
837:, a part of which was also Olimpija (1911–2004) from 1991 and the independence of
1289:
or other title, will stay as separate article about the history of the team like
1272:
1024:
1021:
560:
360:
1504:
994:
955:
189:
168:
2190:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
2050:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1893:
Seem the case was a club that CLAIMED as a successor, sounds like the case of
1704:
1642:
986:
939:
596:
538:
Sounds great. Could you provide an official link to where this was published?
195:
90:
1554:
1466:
1031:
848:
842:
356:
1470:
Olimpija, but I am very interested in the decision, as it will affest also
1184:
will carry the Impact name and maintain the team's legacy in the new league
599:
and later in his career had a short spell (2 official matches in 1.SNL) at
1053:
and was in fact not even the foundation year of the old Olimpija (source:
1579:
838:
725:
410:
218:
2134:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
1998:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
94:
84:
63:
1713:
1004:). After the independence of Slovenia in 1991 Olimpija competed in the
1633:
well basically, if you merge Olimpija articles, then you should merge
938:
I think we will have to improve this article and remove history about
834:
1147:, on the basis of what the English-language sources are saying. See
985:
Olimpija claimed to have been the direct successor of the dissolved
2142:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
2006:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
1277:
I belive that the title of article of Bezigrad can be change from
585:
1495:
has two different entries for two teams on their all-time table (
1559:
980:
Here are some conflicting facts about the history of this club:
519:
The official standing about the club from the 1.SNL - Prva liga
1743:
We have the governing bodies for various sports (in this case
1197:
1178:, because Montreal Impact is a separate legal entity from the
489:
26:
1321:
Olimpija Ljubljana was founded on 2 March 2005 as NK Bežigrad
1174:
I think, the case of Bezigrad/Olimpija has similarities with
829:
Something that I came across of. The official website of the
2157:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
2017:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
1499:), old olimpija is 8th and the new one is 10th, and also
1271:
MLS presents the history of Montreal Inpact as one club (
1012:. Long after the two clubs supposedly "merged" into one.
2118:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
1982:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
1336:
I understand that is more complicated than I thought. --
1265:
English-language source separate the clubs of Olimpija (
847:
For matters to be even more strange, there is a club in
2123:
1987:
308:
291:
286:
281:
276:
1856:
in Italy, i think only legal successor was club using
774:
contender. Even though, officially, their score being
580:
Was Milko Ǵurovski (Djurovski) ever part of this team?
1103:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
217:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
112:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2194:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
2054:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
2152:http://www.nkolimpija.com/?page=club&id=3#1991
2012:http://www.nkolimpija.com/?page=club&id=3#1991
878:Also, I don't know why you moved the article from
1256:Lega Serie A presents the history of Fiorentina (
508:on 20:15, 1 December 2015 (UTC). The result of
2180:This message was posted before February 2018.
2040:This message was posted before February 2018.
1008:(top division), while Ilirija competed in the
2255:Old Olimpija was dissolved in 2005 not 2004!
1703:never bankrupted but was forcibly dissolved.
1106:A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
8:
950:. According to the official website of the
688:I think it is very missleading to call the
324:Protestant Reformation in the Slovene Lands
30:
2259:
1779:
1670:
1609:
833:, which governs Slovenian first division,
264:
163:
58:
664:was one of them and probably a lot more.
1209:Football Federation of the Soviet Union
165:
60:
708:, while it was officialy known as the
2169:to let others know (documentation at
2029:to let others know (documentation at
1214:), but we have two separate articles.
7:
1285:without the foundation year and the
1192:is a separate legal entity from the
1097:The following discussion is closed.
231:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Slovenia
211:This article is within the scope of
126:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Football
106:This article is within the scope of
18:Talk:NK Olimpija Ljubljana (defunct)
49:It is of interest to the following
25:
2122:. Please take a moment to review
1986:. Please take a moment to review
1407:Sources in english has a battle (
1295:Portland Timbers (disambiguation)
948:Slovenian Republic League 1961-62
384:Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 1308
2309:Low-importance Slovenia articles
2294:Low-importance football articles
1966:The discussion above is closed.
1945:Football Association of Slovenia
1745:Football Association of Slovenia
1544:Football Association of Slovenia
1503:treats both clubs as different (
1501:Football Association of Slovenia
493:
268:WikiProject Slovenia to-do list:
198:
188:
167:
93:
83:
62:
31:
2120:NK Olimpija Ljubljana (defunct)
1984:NK Olimpija Ljubljana (defunct)
1907:A.S.D. Città di Giulianova 1924
1749:NK Olimpija Ljubljana (defunct)
1287:NK Olimpija Ljubljana (defunct)
1137:NK Olimpija Ljubljana (defunct)
1010:1991–92 Slovenian Second League
500:This article was nominated for
251:This article has been rated as
146:This article has been rated as
2314:All WikiProject Slovenia pages
2010:Added archive {newarchive} to
1895:FK Bohemians Prague (Střížkov)
1207:which is the successor of the
991:Slovenian Football Association
952:Slovenian Football Association
588:official website (click here:
1:
2304:Start-Class Slovenia articles
2299:WikiProject Football articles
2289:Start-Class football articles
1843:07:01, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
1818:00:14, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
1794:21:05, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
1773:20:43, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
1731:20:43, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
1685:20:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
1660:19:03, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
1624:17:38, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
1599:11:07, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
1573:22:28, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
1532:23:09, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
1517:16:10, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
1126:19:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
716:as it is correctly inscribed
702:1996–97 UEFA Cup Winners' Cup
694:1992–93 UEFA Champions League
618:Apparently not. According to
234:Template:WikiProject Slovenia
225:and see a list of open tasks.
129:Template:WikiProject Football
120:and see a list of open tasks.
1957:09:15, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
1753:NK Olimpija Ljubljana (2005)
1484:23:17, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
1460:20:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
1444:18:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
1421:00:36, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
1395:17:50, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
1380:23:09, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
1365:21:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
1346:21:41, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
1314:NK Olimpija Ljubljana (2005)
1307:21:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
1279:NK Olimpija Ljubljana (2005)
1250:18:12, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
1231:14:37, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
1169:20:15, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
1141:NK Olimpija Ljubljana (2005)
1070:23:37, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
880:NK Olimpija Ljubljana (1911)
624:NK Olimpija Ljubljana (2005)
506:NK Olimpija Ljubljana (2005)
452:Selected article and picture
1938:21:00, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
1885:20:33, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
1219:I do not support the merger
1200:in case of Montreal Impact.
1034:, one of which is Ilirija.
595:played in 1.SNL as part of
101:Association football portal
2330:
2246:18:39, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
2211:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2140:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
2115:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
2071:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2004:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
1979:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1006:1991–92 Slovenian PrvaLiga
674:15:34, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
656:15:30, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
641:01:58, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
613:00:24, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
257:project's importance scale
152:project's importance scale
2274:12:47, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
2106:06:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
1297:, Montreal Inpact etc. --
926:02:47, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
904:21:56, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
862:14:02, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
815:22:03, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
788:10:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
345:Russia–Slovenia relations
263:
250:
183:
145:
78:
57:
1968:Please do not modify it.
1426:About the fans, we have
1217:According to the above,
1100:Please do not modify it.
967:01:10, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
766:20:21, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
738:19:43, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
572:23:02, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
554:12:12, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
2111:External links modified
1975:External links modified
1858:Article 52 of N.O.I.F.
1291:Portland Timbers (MLS)
1205:Russian Football Union
39:This article is rated
1548:Association of 1. SNL
1283:NK Olimpija Ljubljana
1145:NK Olimpija Ljubljana
831:Association of 1. SNL
720:. Especially for the
684:Best European results
469:requested photographs
392:Education in Slovenia
43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
2192:regular verification
2126:. If necessary, add
2052:regular verification
1990:. If necessary, add
1911:Piacenza Calcio 1919
1758:WikiProject Slovenia
1428:FC Red Bull Salzburg
1411:Sun 27 Jul 2014). --
1328:(means NK Bežigrad)
214:WikiProject Slovenia
114:Association football
109:WikiProject Football
2182:After February 2018
2161:parameter below to
2042:After February 2018
2021:parameter below to
1432:SV Austria Salzburg
1312:I read the article
1203:Another example is
1186:(from the article).
1180:old Montreal Impact
1000:and second time in
461:unassessed articles
2187:InternetArchiveBot
2047:InternetArchiveBot
1716:did at the end of
1493:Slovenian PrvaLiga
1326:Olimpija Ljubljana
993:official website:
459:the quality of 35
432:Portal maintenance
45:content assessment
2276:
2264:comment added by
2244:
2212:
2104:
2072:
1903:Giulianova Calcio
1796:
1784:comment added by
1701:NK Branik Maribor
1687:
1675:comment added by
1639:NK Branik Maribor
1626:
1614:comment added by
1190:Bezigrad/Olimpija
1157:worldfootball.net
620:Reprezentacija.rs
552:
516:
515:
488:
487:
484:
483:
480:
479:
476:
475:
237:Slovenia articles
162:
161:
158:
157:
132:football articles
16:(Redirected from
2321:
2240:
2239:Talk to my owner
2235:
2210:
2209:
2188:
2176:
2141:
2133:
2100:
2099:Talk to my owner
2095:
2070:
2069:
2048:
2036:
2005:
1997:
1934:
1927:
1921:
1881:
1874:
1868:
1316:and i see that:
1102:
899:
889:
844:) and not 1911!
810:
800:
761:
751:
662:Željko Milinovič
637:
546:
543:
497:
496:
490:
426:Siddharta (band)
311:
302:tasks you can do
265:
239:
238:
235:
232:
229:
208:
203:
202:
201:
192:
185:
184:
179:
171:
164:
134:
133:
130:
127:
124:
103:
98:
97:
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
42:
36:
35:
27:
21:
2329:
2328:
2324:
2323:
2322:
2320:
2319:
2318:
2279:
2278:
2253:
2243:
2238:
2203:
2196:have permission
2186:
2170:
2135:
2127:
2113:
2103:
2098:
2063:
2056:have permission
2046:
2030:
1999:
1991:
1977:
1972:
1971:
1932:
1925:
1919:
1915:Piacenza Calcio
1879:
1872:
1866:
1648:ND Ilirija 1911
1176:Montreal Impact
1143:be merged into
1133:
1098:
1091:
1089:Merger proposal
895:
885:
827:
825:Foundation year
806:
796:
757:
747:
692:of Olimpija in
686:
633:
582:
541:
521:
494:
422:Gregorij Rožman
376:Edvard Ravnikar
365:Predjama Castle
307:
296:
236:
233:
230:
227:
226:
206:Slovenia portal
204:
199:
197:
177:
131:
128:
125:
122:
121:
99:
92:
72:
40:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
2327:
2325:
2317:
2316:
2311:
2306:
2301:
2296:
2291:
2281:
2280:
2252:
2249:
2236:
2230:
2229:
2222:
2155:
2154:
2146:Added archive
2112:
2109:
2096:
2090:
2089:
2082:
2015:
2014:
1976:
1973:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1899:Bohemians 1905
1888:
1887:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1846:
1845:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1718:2004–05 season
1691:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1635:I. SSK Maribor
1628:
1627:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1575:
1534:
1519:
1486:
1462:
1424:
1423:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1334:
1333:
1323:
1310:
1309:
1275:
1269:
1263:
1260:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1238:ACF Fiorentina
1215:
1201:
1187:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1093:
1092:
1090:
1087:
1086:
1085:
983:
982:
976:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
970:
969:
929:
928:
913:
909:
908:
907:
906:
898:
888:
876:
852:day. Regards,
826:
823:
822:
821:
820:
819:
818:
817:
809:
799:
760:
750:
685:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
636:
628:Milko Ǵurovski
593:Milko Ǵurovski
581:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
520:
517:
514:
513:
510:the discussion
498:
486:
485:
482:
481:
478:
477:
474:
473:
472:
471:
463:
453:
428:
413:
394:
386:
367:
353:Inner Carniola
347:
336:
298:Here are some
295:
294:
289:
284:
279:
273:
270:
269:
261:
260:
253:Low-importance
249:
243:
242:
240:
223:the discussion
210:
209:
193:
181:
180:
178:Low‑importance
172:
160:
159:
156:
155:
148:Low-importance
144:
138:
137:
135:
118:the discussion
105:
104:
88:
76:
75:
73:Low‑importance
67:
55:
54:
48:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2326:
2315:
2312:
2310:
2307:
2305:
2302:
2300:
2297:
2295:
2292:
2290:
2287:
2286:
2284:
2277:
2275:
2271:
2267:
2266:31.15.225.128
2263:
2258:
2250:
2248:
2247:
2241:
2234:
2227:
2223:
2220:
2216:
2215:
2214:
2207:
2201:
2197:
2193:
2189:
2183:
2178:
2174:
2168:
2164:
2160:
2153:
2149:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2139:
2131:
2125:
2121:
2116:
2110:
2108:
2107:
2101:
2094:
2087:
2083:
2080:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2067:
2061:
2057:
2053:
2049:
2043:
2038:
2034:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2013:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2003:
1995:
1989:
1985:
1980:
1974:
1969:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1946:
1941:
1940:
1939:
1936:
1935:
1929:
1928:
1922:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1891:
1890:
1889:
1886:
1883:
1882:
1876:
1875:
1869:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1852:
1851:
1844:
1840:
1836:
1835:31.15.147.139
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1819:
1815:
1811:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1795:
1791:
1787:
1786:31.15.147.139
1783:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1770:
1766:
1762:
1759:
1754:
1750:
1746:
1742:
1741:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1706:
1702:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1677:31.15.147.139
1674:
1667:
1666:
1661:
1657:
1653:
1649:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1616:31.15.147.139
1613:
1606:
1605:
1600:
1596:
1592:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1581:
1576:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1561:
1556:
1552:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1538:
1535:
1533:
1529:
1525:
1520:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1487:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1468:
1463:
1461:
1458:
1455:
1451:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1409:chelseafc.com
1406:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1332:
1327:
1324:
1322:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1315:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1273:
1270:
1267:
1264:
1261:
1258:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1213:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1188:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1127:
1123:
1120:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1104:
1101:
1095:
1094:
1088:
1083:
1079:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1057:
1055:
1052:
1048:
1043:
1040:
1035:
1033:
1027:
1025:
1022:
1019:
1013:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
992:
988:
981:
978:
977:
968:
964:
960:
956:
953:
949:
945:
941:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
930:
927:
923:
919:
914:
911:
910:
905:
901:
900:
896:
891:
890:
886:
881:
877:
873:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
859:
855:
850:
845:
843:
840:
836:
832:
824:
816:
812:
811:
807:
802:
801:
797:
791:
790:
789:
785:
781:
777:
773:
769:
768:
767:
763:
762:
758:
753:
752:
748:
742:
741:
740:
739:
735:
731:
727:
723:
719:
715:
711:
707:
703:
699:
695:
691:
683:
675:
671:
667:
663:
659:
658:
657:
653:
649:
644:
643:
642:
639:
638:
634:
629:
625:
621:
617:
616:
615:
614:
610:
606:
602:
598:
594:
590:
587:
579:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
556:
555:
550:
545:
544:
537:
536:
535:
532:
528:
525:
518:
512:was no merge.
511:
507:
503:
499:
492:
491:
470:
467:
464:
462:
458:
454:
451:
447:
446:announcements
443:
439:
435:
433:
429:
427:
423:
420:
418:
414:
412:
408:
404:
403:Ajdovi žganci
401:
399:
395:
393:
390:
387:
385:
381:
377:
374:
372:
368:
366:
362:
358:
354:
351:
350:Unreferenced:
348:
346:
343:
341:
337:
335:
332:
331:Metlika black
328:
325:
321:
319:
315:
314:
313:
310:
305:
304:
303:
293:
290:
288:
285:
283:
280:
278:
275:
274:
272:
271:
267:
266:
262:
258:
254:
248:
245:
244:
241:
224:
220:
216:
215:
207:
196:
194:
191:
187:
186:
182:
176:
173:
170:
166:
153:
149:
143:
140:
139:
136:
119:
115:
111:
110:
102:
96:
91:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
34:
29:
28:
19:
2260:— Preceding
2254:
2231:
2206:source check
2185:
2179:
2166:
2162:
2158:
2156:
2117:
2114:
2091:
2066:source check
2045:
2039:
2026:
2022:
2018:
2016:
1981:
1978:
1967:
1931:
1924:
1878:
1871:
1862:Rangers F.C.
1853:
1780:— Preceding
1763:)? Regards,
1710:NK Ljubljana
1671:— Preceding
1652:86.58.36.235
1610:— Preceding
1591:86.58.36.235
1536:
1509:86.58.36.235
1488:
1474:and others.
1472:FC Ljubljana
1449:
1425:
1335:
1329:
1325:
1320:
1311:
1218:
1194:old Olimpija
1183:
1134:
1118:
1105:
1099:
1096:
1058:
1044:
1036:
1028:
1014:
984:
979:
944:World War II
894:
884:
871:
846:
828:
805:
795:
775:
771:
756:
746:
721:
714:Second round
713:
709:
705:
697:
690:best results
687:
632:
601:NK Ljubljana
583:
540:
530:
529:
523:
522:
442:Did you know
430:
415:
396:
388:
369:
349:
338:
316:
300:
299:
297:
252:
212:
147:
107:
51:WikiProjects
2173:Sourcecheck
2033:Sourcecheck
1491:- official
776:group stage
772:Round of 32
722:Round of 32
710:First round
706:Round of 16
698:Round of 32
380:Škofja Loka
361:Pavel Golia
41:Start-class
2283:Categories
1920:Matthew_hk
1867:Matthew_hk
1705:NK Maribor
1643:NK Maribor
1357:FkpCascais
1211:for UEFA (
987:ND Ilirija
940:ND Ilirija
887:Timbouctou
798:Timbouctou
749:Timbouctou
635:Timbouctou
597:NK Maribor
542:Timbouctou
407:Čop Street
2226:this tool
2219:this tool
2086:this tool
2079:this tool
1761:talk page
1555:ND Gorica
1467:ND Gorica
1387:QuinlanLJ
1149:Soccerway
1112:Cas Liber
1032:Ljubljana
849:Ljubljana
357:Litostroj
2262:unsigned
2232:Cheers.—
2130:cbignore
2092:Cheers.—
1994:cbignore
1782:unsigned
1673:unsigned
1612:unsigned
1580:NK Naklo
1546:and the
1122:contribs
1051:Olimpija
839:Slovenia
726:AC Milan
712:and the
531:English:
524:Slovene:
466:Take/Add
411:Radenska
318:Requests
228:Slovenia
219:Slovenia
175:Slovenia
123:Football
70:Football
2242::Online
2159:checked
2124:my edit
2102::Online
2019:checked
1988:my edit
1949:Linhart
1854:Comment
1810:Ratipok
1765:Ratipok
1723:Ratipok
1714:NK Mura
1565:Ratipok
1524:Linhart
1476:Linhart
1457:Snowman
1372:Eldumpo
1331:season.
1242:Eldumpo
1161:Eldumpo
1078:Linhart
1062:Ratipok
1047:Dnevnik
1039:Dnevnik
1002:1985–86
998:1961–62
959:Ratipok
918:Ratipok
854:Ratipok
780:Ratipok
730:Ratipok
700:and in
666:Ratipok
648:Ratipok
605:Ratipok
564:Ratipok
502:merging
450:suggest
436:Update
389:Expand:
371:Cleanup
282:history
255:on the
150:on the
2167:failed
2138:nobots
2027:failed
2002:nobots
1537:Oppose
1489:Oppose
1450:Oppose
1182:, but
835:1. SNL
457:assess
448:, and
340:Wikify
47:scale.
1454:Giant
1436:IM-yb
1413:IM-yb
1338:IM-yb
1299:IM-yb
1223:IM-yb
1135:That
1060:1961.
1018:Večer
778:, Lp.
586:1.SNL
504:with
455:Help
398:Stubs
309:watch
292:purge
287:watch
2270:talk
2251:Year
2163:true
2023:true
1953:talk
1913:and
1905:and
1897:and
1839:talk
1814:talk
1790:talk
1769:talk
1751:and
1727:talk
1712:and
1681:talk
1656:talk
1641:and
1620:talk
1595:talk
1569:talk
1560:UEFA
1528:talk
1513:talk
1505:LINK
1497:LINK
1480:talk
1440:talk
1430:and
1417:talk
1391:talk
1376:talk
1361:talk
1342:talk
1303:talk
1246:talk
1227:talk
1221:. --
1165:talk
1155:and
1153:UEFA
1139:and
1116:talk
1082:talk
1066:talk
963:talk
922:talk
897:talk
858:talk
808:talk
784:talk
759:talk
734:talk
718:here
670:talk
652:talk
609:talk
568:talk
549:talk
438:News
417:NPOV
334:(sl)
327:(sl)
277:edit
2200:RfC
2177:).
2165:or
2150:to
2060:RfC
2037:).
2025:or
1281:to
1198:MLS
1056:).
957:).
872:and
704:as
696:as
312:):
247:Low
142:Low
2285::
2272:)
2213:.
2208:}}
2204:{{
2175:}}
2171:{{
2136:{{
2132:}}
2128:{{
2073:.
2068:}}
2064:{{
2035:}}
2031:{{
2000:{{
1996:}}
1992:{{
1955:)
1864:.
1841:)
1816:)
1792:)
1771:)
1729:)
1683:)
1658:)
1637:,
1622:)
1597:)
1571:)
1530:)
1515:)
1482:)
1442:)
1419:)
1393:)
1378:)
1363:)
1344:)
1305:)
1293:–
1248:)
1229:)
1167:)
1159:.
1151:,
1124:)
1068:)
965:)
924:)
902:)
860:)
813:)
786:)
764:)
736:)
672:)
654:)
611:)
570:)
444:,
440:,
424:,
409:,
405:,
382:,
378:,
363:,
359:,
355:,
329:,
322:,
2268:(
2228:.
2221:.
2088:.
2081:.
1951:(
1933:c
1926:t
1880:c
1873:t
1837:(
1812:(
1788:(
1767:(
1725:(
1679:(
1654:(
1618:(
1593:(
1567:(
1526:(
1511:(
1478:(
1438:(
1415:(
1389:(
1374:(
1359:(
1340:(
1301:(
1244:(
1225:(
1163:(
1119:·
1114:(
1084:)
1080:(
1064:(
961:(
920:(
892:(
856:(
803:(
782:(
754:(
732:(
668:(
650:(
607:(
603:.
566:(
551:)
547:(
434::
419::
400::
373::
342::
320::
306:(
259:.
154:.
53::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
