42:
748:
712:
684:
659:
636:
624:
603:
587:
575:
544:
508:
728:
269:
I've tweaked the lead, but there isn't really a clear basis for it (there's a differentiating factor to sexual offences mentioned) and the OAPA act. Both Smith & Hogan (I now have the 2005 edition) and
Simester and Sullivan use this distinction, I'm almost certain it's maintained in the other big
381:
When I review the "What Links Here" for this article, I don't see many articles. At a minimum, I would expect to see all the "main" articles on the various crimes (battery, assault, etc) linking here. For GA, it is not required that you add text to those articles, but at a minimum you should put
332:
has a "Criminal Law" side bar. I know the footer navbox already meets much of that need, but (a) without pictures, the article looks like a wall of text, so a sidebar may help; and (b) some novice readers may not think to scroll all the way to the bottom: the sidebar may help them realize there
240:
It should be made clear in the Lead why this group of crimes is, well, a group. The title is "Non-fatal offences against the person". Is there a reason that group of crimes exist? What do the sources say (as to why they are grouped)? Do the crimes all have something in common? Another way of
47:
126:
122:
107:
99:
52:
270:
textbooks as well. Excluding fatal offences is the anomaly, if you like, but it's a pragmatic one: the death of a person is an important factor socially/factually/legally. I've done a bit on
115:
17:
92:
80:
258:
The problem comes when you ask "why the US?". An international comparison would be interesting, and lengthy, and therefore best left to the general pages (e.g.
70:
538:
196:
486:
706:
351:
Added a graph I made instead, don't think the sidebar would help because it's about general crimes and not those in
English law.
448:
Changed. I had intended the last to be intentional, but I guess an over-specific redlink might be less confusing to the reader.
469:
464:
421:
416:
391:
372:
367:
342:
315:
295:
290:
174:
160:
156:
75:
597:
252:
I'm afraid I'm really struggling for a suitable picture. No similar article uses them (although the articles aren't great).
382:
a link to this article in their "see also" section. I'm guessing maybe 10 articles or so should link to this one. --
329:
518:
185:
Any pictures available? Look in other, related articles and see if any pic/image is suitable for this article.
561:
271:
678:
230:
Would it be appropriate to add a section (or mere paragraph) comparing
English to US law on these crimes?
218:
460:
412:
387:
363:
338:
311:
286:
170:
150:
698:
569:
526:
490:
263:
207:
649:
522:
456:
408:
383:
359:
334:
307:
282:
166:
146:
722:
534:
530:
245:
invented by a WP editor, but rather a collection made by the sources themselves.
241:
asking this question: Can you demonstrate that this collection of crimes is
259:
235:"Assault is a summary offence...". Need to define "Summary offense".
333:
are other, related articles available in the encyclopedia. --
721:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
705:
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
18:
Talk:Non-fatal offences against the person in
English law
134:
103:
400:Added three more, though it's not a GA criterion.
584:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
8:
30:
61:
33:
190:Perhaps add a footer navbox? one of:
7:
430:The following links are ambiguous:
656:Fair representation without bias:
328:What about a sidebar? I see that
24:
746:
726:
710:
682:
657:
634:
622:
601:
585:
573:
542:
506:
727:
1:
470:21:36, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
422:21:36, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
392:14:33, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
373:21:36, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
343:14:28, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
316:14:28, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
296:11:08, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
274:, will link to that as well.
175:04:15, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
161:04:15, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
747:
711:
683:
658:
635:
623:
602:
586:
574:
543:
507:
197:English criminal law navbox
771:
330:Offence against the person
702:to illustrate the topic?
500:reasonably well written
272:Homicide in English law
616:broad in its coverage
570:References to sources
598:No original research
707:fair use rationales
621:A. Major aspects:
557:factually accurate
505:A. Prose quality:
165:I'll take this. --
723:suitable captions
89:
88:
762:
750:
749:
730:
729:
714:
713:
686:
685:
661:
660:
638:
637:
626:
625:
605:
604:
589:
588:
577:
576:
546:
545:
510:
509:
468:
453:
420:
405:
371:
356:
294:
279:
223:
217:
212:
206:
201:
195:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
770:
769:
765:
764:
763:
761:
760:
759:
521:compliance for
483:
454:
449:
406:
401:
357:
352:
280:
275:
264:battery (crime)
221:
215:
210:
204:
199:
193:
182:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
768:
766:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
753:
745:Pass or Fail:
737:
736:
735:
734:
733:
719:
718:
717:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
631:
630:
629:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
594:
593:
592:
582:
581:
580:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
531:words to watch
515:
514:
513:
482:
479:
477:
475:
474:
473:
472:
443:
442:
441:
440:
437:
434:
427:
426:
425:
424:
395:
394:
378:
377:
376:
375:
346:
345:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
319:
318:
299:
298:
267:
256:
255:Added a navbox
253:
247:
246:
237:
236:
232:
231:
227:
226:
225:
224:
213:
202:
187:
186:
181:
178:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
767:
752:
751:
744:
743:
741:
738:
732:
731:
724:
720:
716:
715:
708:
704:
703:
701:
700:
694:
688:
687:
680:
676:
675:
673:
669:
663:
662:
655:
654:
652:
651:
646:
640:
639:
632:
628:
627:
620:
619:
617:
613:
607:
606:
599:
595:
591:
590:
583:
579:
578:
571:
567:
566:
564:
563:
558:
554:
548:
547:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
511:
504:
503:
501:
497:
496:
495:
494:
492:
489:review – see
488:
480:
478:
471:
466:
462:
458:
452:
447:
446:
445:
444:
438:
435:
432:
431:
429:
428:
423:
418:
414:
410:
404:
399:
398:
397:
396:
393:
389:
385:
380:
379:
374:
369:
365:
361:
355:
350:
349:
348:
347:
344:
340:
336:
331:
327:
326:
317:
313:
309:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
297:
292:
288:
284:
278:
273:
268:
265:
261:
257:
254:
251:
250:
249:
248:
244:
239:
238:
234:
233:
229:
228:
220:
214:
209:
203:
198:
192:
191:
189:
188:
184:
183:
179:
177:
176:
172:
168:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
739:
696:
671:
648:
633:B. Focused:
615:
560:
556:
499:
493:for criteria
485:
484:
476:
450:
439:Bob Sullivan
433:Recklessness
402:
353:
276:
242:
219:Europe topic
164:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
104:visual edit
562:verifiable
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
679:edit wars
481:Tick list
451:Grandiose
436:Lord Hope
403:Grandiose
384:Noleander
354:Grandiose
335:Noleander
308:Noleander
277:Grandiose
167:Noleander
147:Noleander
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
697:contain
695:Does it
491:WP:WIAGA
465:contribs
417:contribs
368:contribs
306:Okay. --
291:contribs
180:Comments
157:contribs
76:Criteria
740:Overall
681:, etc:
650:neutral
535:fiction
260:assault
127:history
108:history
94:Article
699:images
672:stable
670:Is it
647:Is it
614:Is it
555:Is it
537:, and
527:layout
498:Is it
208:UK law
539:lists
136:Watch
16:<
559:and
523:lead
461:talk
413:talk
388:talk
364:talk
339:talk
312:talk
287:talk
171:talk
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
677:No
596:C.
568:A.
519:MoS
517:B.
243:not
742::
725::
709::
674:?
653:?
618:?
600::
572::
565:?
541::
533:,
529:,
525:,
502:?
487:GA
467:)
463:,
459:,
457:me
419:)
415:,
411:,
409:me
390:)
370:)
366:,
362:,
360:me
341:)
314:)
293:)
289:,
285:,
283:me
266:).
262:,
222:}}
216:{{
211:}}
205:{{
200:}}
194:{{
173:)
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
455:(
407:(
386:(
358:(
337:(
310:(
281:(
169:(
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.