31:
125:
650:. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
700:
744:
Not enough assumptions are being made on this vehicles performance capabilities. Although its no surprise that the maximum speed, range, and other tactical datapoints are missing, this vehicle contains many 'black' aspects, and it should be openly noted that much of the technology of the aircraft is
276:
I'm pretty confident that I am right about this... It's hard to find a "negative" source if you will, to prove that something is *not* called something. I think the best thing to do is to just call the article "X-47" or "Northrup-Grumman X-47" (whichever is standard practice) and refer to the X-47A
637:
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for
Knowledge (XXG). This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a
334:
I agree with this; the "A" is the
Pegasus and the "B" doesn't have a name like that, other than "N-UCAS-D", which is basically just its project title. In all honesty, this eventually won't be an issue because I forsee the X-47A and X-47B being split into seperate article... they're just such
212:
AFAIK, the current article title is incorrect. The X-47A was known as the "Pegasus", but the X-47B has not been named. Furthermore, the X-47A and the X-47B are much, much different aircraft (For example, the B is probably twice the size of A). The article is confusing in that respect.
567:
Lockheed Martin is revealing additional details about its submission for the US Navy's unmanned carrier launched airbone surveillance and strike (UCLASS) aircraft programme, saying it has already built a full-scale mock-up of the flying wing design.
228:"Close enough for government work." And do you have a source for the B not eing named as yet? That's always good to have. Anyway, we'll probably split the B out to its own article eventually, as more info on it is released. -
610:
The stated wingspan for X-47C ("172 ft (52.4 m)") doesn't make sense. That's the size of a B-2 and would not fit on a carrier. It doesn't match the payload ("10,000 lb (4,500 kg)") either. The reference is a dead link.
81:- we typically cover developmental models in the same article. I can't see anything significant which would warrant a separate article, and having a separate one that's so short also messes up the X-planes list.
646:. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the
477:
I just found a pretty nice AIAA paper that I can summarize and use for a more detailed "design" section for this article, so I'll try and break that out in the near future. -
419:
Great! I'd be willing to to work on splitting the material properly and adding what info is available, but I won't really have a chance to do that until after the weekend. -
642:. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the
571:
So do we create a UCLASS page that then links to all the different UAV proposals for the program or wait a week for the program name to change again?
173:
This odd line is in the middle of a sort of a timeline, with no explanation. I assume it doesn't mean to say that the X-47 program is terminated?
564:
47:
17:
618:
106:
It was only a demostration vehicle, and never intended to enter service itself. Thus no need for the test vehicles to be armed. -
738:, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
96:
How can this UAV engage in combat without weapons? The specifications state it has no armament; this makes no sense to me.
707:
This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—
643:
639:
365:
Done! Since we have 1 photo of each type, and specs for each type also, we might as well start planning the split now.
335:
different aircraft. In the meantime, however, I think having
Pegasus on the article title is misleading to readers. -
38:
492:
595:
444:
Done! I kept most of the original text for the X-47B as background, but it could probably be tightend a bit. -
168:
The J-UCAS program was terminated on
January 13, 2006 as part of the US Military's Quadrennial Defense Review.
622:
136:
614:
718:
692:
626:
599:
580:
550:
539:
504:
486:
468:
453:
428:
394:
382:
374:
344:
317:
286:
263:
237:
222:
201:
182:
155:
140:
110:
100:
85:
713:
687:
482:
464:
424:
377:. The X-47B would need more text, but that's really about all that's needed. Tehre is an old article at
366:
340:
282:
259:
218:
565:
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/lockheed-unveils-more-information-on-uclass-programme-384589/
647:
591:
178:
151:
587:
247:
675:
535:
500:
313:
197:
132:
302:
708:
682:
638:
good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the
527:
478:
460:
449:
420:
390:
336:
278:
255:
251:
233:
214:
735:
576:
545:
308:
I can't find any mention of a name associated with B-model after some internet searches. -
306:
586:
If you really think it is constantly changing and in flux, you know the answer to that.
459:
Ok, great! I'll take a look over the two articles and work on the wording and whatnot. -
188:
Only the Joint part. The Air Force and Navy went forward with separate programs. See
174:
147:
82:
531:
496:
378:
370:
309:
193:
189:
277:
as the
Pegasus in the article and just call the X-47B that or UCAS or something. -
250:), just UCAS, while they seperatly refer to the J-UCAS Demonstrator as "Pegasus" (
445:
386:
229:
107:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
572:
97:
146:
That picture comes from the same source and has the same copyright status.
124:
674:
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact
385:
so we can keep its history. (Sadly, there was no text to speak of.) -
526:- well I would as I am the proposer. A previous merge of X-47C with
491:
FWIW here's a X-47 article from AIAA's magazine, Aerospace
America:
516:
381:
that was merged to this one, so I'm asking an admin to move it to
123:
248:
http://www.as.northropgrumman.com/products/nucasx47b/index.html
246:
Well, the NGC site never refers to the X-47B as the "pegasus" (
25:
131:
for the main picture since the current one is copyrighted?
654:
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
252:
http://www.atoz.northropgrumman.com/Automated/AtoZ/P.html
369:
can be a DAB or SIA page. That articvle can be moved to
730:
192:
for more. This has been clarified in the article. -
659:http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/x47/
734:, and are posted here for posterity. Following
561:The latest spin on the Pentagon-go-round is...
301:The X-47 did not have the Pegasus name in the
728:The comment(s) below were originally left at
8:
731:Talk:Northrop Grumman X-47A Pegasus/Comments
544:Aren't they completely different aircraft?
305:. At least the X-47A got the Pegasus name.
678:and ask him to program me with more info.
751:Substituted at 18:31, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
633:Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
681:From your friendly hard working bot.—
7:
18:Talk:Northrop Grumman X-47A Pegasus
121:Doesn't it make more sense to use
24:
736:several discussions in past years
303:2004 DoD Model Designation report
698:
29:
551:22:56, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
540:20:57, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
429:21:52, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
395:20:41, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
345:19:37, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
318:19:24, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
287:17:45, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
1:
640:request page for whitelisting
493:"Pegasus: UCAVs Look Seaward"
86:15:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
665:\bairforce-technology\.com\b
505:20:48, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
487:15:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
469:04:01, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
454:19:56, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
373:, and create the new one at
141:01:49, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
111:01:55, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
101:01:41, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
264:14:10, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
238:08:10, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
223:06:44, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
765:
600:16:04, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
581:14:44, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
743:
719:19:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
693:13:05, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
202:12:39, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
183:05:20, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
156:05:20, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
627:16:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
667:on the local blacklist
644:blacklist request page
557:Redirected from UCAS-D
495:It might be of help. -
383:Northrop Grumman X-47B
375:Northrop Grumman X-47B
128:
367:Northrop Grumman X-47
127:
42:of past discussions.
648:request page on meta
530:was nonsensical IMHO
724:Assessment comment
676:User:Cyberpower678
515:proposed merge of
162:Program terminated
129:
749:
748:
617:comment added by
67:
66:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
756:
741:
740:
733:
711:
706:
702:
701:
685:
666:
629:
528:Stealth aircraft
73:Merge suggestion
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
764:
763:
759:
758:
757:
755:
754:
753:
729:
726:
717:
709:
699:
697:
691:
683:
664:
635:
612:
608:
559:
520:
210:
164:
119:
94:
75:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
762:
760:
747:
746:
725:
722:
715:
689:
672:
671:
670:
669:
634:
631:
607:
606:X-47C wingspan
604:
603:
602:
592:OuroborosCobra
558:
555:
554:
553:
542:
519:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
472:
471:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
354:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
269:
268:
267:
266:
241:
240:
209:
206:
205:
204:
171:
170:
163:
160:
159:
158:
118:
115:
114:
113:
93:
90:
89:
88:
79:Agree to merge
74:
71:
69:
65:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
761:
752:
742:
739:
737:
732:
723:
721:
720:
714:
712:
705:
695:
694:
688:
686:
679:
677:
668:
663:Triggered by
661:
660:
658:
657:
656:
655:
651:
649:
645:
641:
632:
630:
628:
624:
620:
616:
605:
601:
597:
593:
589:
585:
584:
583:
582:
578:
574:
569:
566:
562:
556:
552:
549:
547:
543:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
522:
521:
518:
514:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
489:
488:
484:
480:
476:
475:
474:
473:
470:
466:
462:
458:
457:
456:
455:
451:
447:
430:
426:
422:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
379:Grumman X-47B
376:
372:
371:X-47A Pegasus
368:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
346:
342:
338:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
319:
315:
311:
307:
304:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
288:
284:
280:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
244:
243:
242:
239:
235:
231:
227:
226:
225:
224:
220:
216:
208:Article Title
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
186:
185:
184:
180:
176:
169:
166:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
144:
143:
142:
138:
134:
133:Supergeek1694
126:
122:
116:
112:
109:
105:
104:
103:
102:
99:
91:
87:
84:
80:
77:
76:
72:
70:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
750:
727:
703:
696:
680:
673:
662:
653:
652:
636:
619:85.229.39.98
613:— Preceding
609:
570:
563:
560:
548:
523:
443:
211:
172:
167:
130:
120:
95:
92:No Armament?
78:
68:
60:
43:
37:
745:classified.
710:cyberbot II
684:cyberbot II
479:SidewinderX
461:SidewinderX
421:SidewinderX
337:SidewinderX
279:SidewinderX
256:SidewinderX
215:SidewinderX
36:This is an
546:Sp33dyphil
588:WP:RECENT
190:X-47 page
175:Tempshill
148:Tempshill
83:Akradecki
61:Archive 1
704:Resolved
615:unsigned
532:Petebutt
497:Fnlayson
310:Fnlayson
194:Fnlayson
117:Picture
39:archive
716:Online
690:Online
446:BilCat
387:BilCat
230:BilCat
108:BillCJ
573:Hcobb
524:Agree
517:X-47C
98:Ian01
16:<
623:talk
596:talk
590:. --
577:talk
536:talk
501:talk
483:talk
465:talk
450:talk
425:talk
391:talk
341:talk
314:talk
283:talk
260:talk
254:). -
234:talk
219:talk
198:talk
179:talk
152:talk
137:talk
625:)
598:)
579:)
538:)
503:)
485:)
467:)
452:)
427:)
393:)
343:)
316:)
285:)
262:)
236:)
221:)
200:)
181:)
154:)
139:)
621:(
594:(
575:(
534:(
499:(
481:(
463:(
448:(
423:(
389:(
339:(
312:(
281:(
258:(
232:(
217:(
213:-
196:(
177:(
150:(
135:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
