Talk:Natural history - Knowledge (XXG)

1907:

in academe, which eliminate the opportunity for both young scientists and the general public to learn the fundamentals that help us predict population levels and the responses by complex systems to environmental variation. Science and management demands that complex systems be simplified, but the art of appropriate simplification depends on a basic understanding of the important natural history. It seems unlikely that meaningful conservation and restoration can be accomplished unless we recover the tradition of supporting research in and the teaching of natural history. We must reinstate natural science courses in all our academic institutions to insure that students experience nature first-hand and are instructed in the fundamentals of the natural sciences.

1256:. "This book brings together primary source materials on major theme in Hawaiian natural history: the geological process that have built the Islands; the physical factors that influence the Islands' terrestrial ecosystems; the dynamics of the sea that support coral reefs, fish, and mollusks; the peculiarities of animals and plants that have evolved in the Islands and are found nowhere else; and the human impact on the land, plants, and animals." I've been looking at a few other books and they all have the same/similar structure. It may help if I list the topics and categories discussed. In the meantime, Pete, check out how geologic history in terms of the Natural history of Chaco Canyon is handled in 1681:

currently the President of the Birmingham Natural History Society, so with this hat on, I'm pleased to see that someone else has mentioned the Society in the article and added an external link. However, I'm also currently the Secretary of the Sutton Coldfield Natural History Society, so, with this hat on, it would be nice to see it mentioned in the article and have an external link. The problem is that the same could be argued for any other natural history society in Britain or elsewhere in the world. Can someone come up with some criteria for including references to specific societies? Otherwise I'm inclined to remove them.

1744:

and I first attempted to edit from your text, but it was hard to keep the flow intact. Because natural history draws from a number of disciplines both inside and outside of science, getting a well-referenced article requires some broad contribution, and while I think the text I inserted does a fairly good job of articulating the defining features of natural history from a natural sciences perspective, it still needs additional content and references focused on modern definitions that come from both the physical sciences, and the arts and humanities perspectives (

476: 455: 90: 896: 263: 875: 144: 123: 906: 486: 21: 368: 253: 347: 232: 378: 1434:

articles, not anything else. So the 'natural history' article needs to be re-written and accepted by WP editors before anything else changes." This is false. In fact, the natural history article does mention these things, and nothing it states needs to be "re-written" and "accepted". If Hmains had familiarized himself with the topic on Knowledge (XXG), he would see that natural history articles

798: 788: 767: 2169:

than its modern expression as a true scientific field. Modern modern natural history is a field set squarely within the auspices of fisheries and wildlife ecology for animals, and consevation ecology for both plants and animals. The largest area of natural history study focuses on one organism, Homo sapiens, and is encompassed by medicine and clinical research, including

81: 2412:

group of herpetologists, including editing biographical articles and citing references by them, and may possibly be affiliated with them. Herpetology is but one aspect of natural history, and care should be taken to introduce any new material with an eye towards how it balances the article as a whole, not shift focus. Some material might plausibly be incorporated to

154: 2458:

observed the state of life on earth, certainly, but it is not equivalent to it; nor is it the scientific study of life, Biology in all its forms (genetics, evo devo, taxonomy, ...). So the timeline doesn't fit here. If a timeline were to be provided, it would reflect the development of the study of NH itself, and it would have a much shorter span.

603: 2059:

The nineteenth century section is oddly titled 'Birth of scientific biology', with some quite dismissive text. This is close to being off topic for a natural history article - unless the sense is 'Death of natural history' - surely a bit premature, like Huck Finn's announcement. The section should be

1567:

There's a paragraph about the Natural History Network at the bottom of the section on Natural History Societies. I don't think this organisation is of particular importance, except to the people who are in it; there are no clear Google hits to it other than its own website, which is not of very good

1433:

that he is basing his categorization on WP, but he actually isn't. For example, Hmains writes: "...the 'Natural history' article does not say much beyond 'plants' and 'animals': not climate, not geologic history, not human prehistory, etc Generally, WP categories should be based on the content of WP

1412:

Item 9 in WP category guidelines states: "An article should normally possess all the referenced information necessary to demonstrate that it belongs in each of its categories. Avoid including categories in an article if the article itself doesn't adequately show it belongs there. For example, avoid

1906:

The last century has seen enormous environmental degradation: many populations are in drastic decline, and their ecosystems have been vastly altered. There is an urgent need to understand the causes of the decline... These environmental crises coincide with the virtual banishment of natural sciences

1528:

The final paragraph before the quotation in this section looks like an almost verbatim copy of the first paragraph (in both cases "Natural history involves the research... climatology"). I'm not going to strip it out wholesale, because it has a reference that can be merged into the first paragraph,

1306:

We have all these 'Natural history of foo' categories for each country and they are all subcategories of their 'Environment of foo' category which is in turn a subcat of the higher level 'foo' category for the country. We have at least one editor who says this is not right, that natural history is

2168:

Much confusion exists, even within the scientific community due to the term "Natural History" because early natural history studies were largely unscientific and often utilized large degrees of inductive reasoning. The coloquial use of the term natural history refers back to its early roots rather

2083: 2019:

If you go to a natural history musuem you'll find lots of "history" as we understand the term. But in most natural history before Darwin there isn't much "history". The average natural history text would be much more concenred with classification of contemporary species, rather than the development

1743:

Hello Peter - I reworked the modern definition section, trying to get a more complete set of modern definitions for natural history included in the text. My objective was also to increase the flow, and point to some common themes in the definitions of natural history. I liked your starting point,

1457:

Sister categorization is certainly an acceptable compromise, as multiple categories will solve the problem. So for example, instead of adding Category:Environment of California to Category:Natural history of California in order to access the climate cats, we just add Category:Climate of California

1276:

My point is: however much some may write, the 'Natural history' article does not say much beyond 'plants' and 'animals': not climate, not geologic history, not human prehistory, etc Generally, WP categories should be based on the content of WP articles, not anything else. So the 'natural history'

2411:

I support the removal from the lead and article. That material has a clear US-bias, an essay-like tone ("one can argue"), and appears to unduly name-drop journals (the list of journals was simply unsightly and indiscriminate). That particular IP has a recent contribution history focused on a small

1680:

I feel uneasy about selecting specific natural history societies for mention in the article. I agree that natural history societies in general should be mentioned (and there is, I think, scope for an article about them – in particular their historic contributions to knowledge). To be specific: I'm

1321:

to be a subcategory. The current scheme is backwards. We don't justify arguments by what is found on Knowledge (XXG). Look at any book on natural history and you will see that it contains environment-related articles, such as physical geography, wildlife, and climate, and many others. Start with

2457:

I've removed a recently-added timeline of life. The reason: Natural History is a human activity, conducted by people over the past few centuries (arguably, Pliny's use of the term in classical times referred to something entirely different, but if you like, then say 'millennia' for centuries). It

2540:

I believe adding additional contributors to this science in the history section would be helpful in explaining this topic. Also, changing the definitions subheadings from dates to something more descriptive would make the flow of the article better and create a better separation from the history

1244:

I've been reading some books on Natural history, so I can help out. To answer Hmains and Pete, yes, geology and climatology are both part of natural history. Geologic history in terms of natural history, is usually discussed in relation to the geography of a particular area. So, for example, a

2020:

of species over time (didn't they think everything had remained the same since Creation, anyway?). I was hoping the article would shed light in the shift in the definition of "history" but I didn't see anything relevant, other than a hint that "history" is an artifact of translation from Latin.

1918:

When asked what could be done to improve this situation, Dayton replied that "Not only is there a huge elitist prejudice against natural history and for microbiology, simple economics almost rule out a change, because good natural history classes must be small." Nevertheless he suggested that

1700:

I think this is quite an important article. However, it has become, in my view, rather confused. There is a lot of useful and relevant information, but it has too obviously been added by different editors at different times, with the result that it is often repetitious and difficult to read.

1040:

This was Recently added; I've cut it for reasons explained below: "In 21st century it actually befits the increased understanding of the web of life, connections among ecosystems, organic and inorganic parts of the planet, and the relationships between the whole and the cosmos in general."

2327:

Bhopal, RS (2008). "Interrelated concepts in the epidemiology of disease: Natural history, spectrum, iceberg, population patterns, and screening". Concepts of epidemiology: Integrating the ideas, theories, principles, and methods of epidemiology (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

2206:. Ornithology journals tend to publish fewer descriptive natural history studies outside of conservation-related studies because this discipline largely filled in the blanks decades prior to others thanks to the large numbers of hobbiest birdwatchers. Although natural history encompasses 1176:

Natural history is the scientific study of plants and animals in their natural environments. It is concerned with levels of organization from the individual organism to the ecosystem, and stresses identification, life history, distribution, abundance, and inter-relationships. It often and

2432:

I also support the removal, as the material is. It doesn't belong in the lead, for sure, and definitely has a US-centric bias and a somewhat polemical tone, both not suitable for Knowledge (XXG). But the better-sourced material, carefully chosen, can be incorporated into the article, as

1006:

According to how "Natural History" is described in this article, I believe it relates to an area of study (including field trips) that has been incorporated into public education, in the primary and junior-high levels. I'm sure that private schools often have this component, too.

1806:. This editor's contributions are always well provided with citations, but examination of these sources often reveals either a blatant misrepresentation of those sources or a selective interpretation, going beyond any reasonable interpretation of the authors' intent. Please see: 2161:

An IP has proposed the following (which was in the lead section). It contains some useful ideas but seems to be sourced mainly from Herpetology, which may be all right. I think it needs some reworking before incorporation into the body, and then summarizing for use in the lead:

2500:

Does the last paragraph of the first subheading (the one about Herschel) fit here? It seems to have little to do with natural history in general, instead focusing on the life of one astronomer. Certainly, he contributed to this field but this whole thing seems out of place.

1568:

quality. The current paragraph gives no great justification for being there. It seems out of place in an article that tries to provide an overview of a huge subject. I don't like to remove information, but if nobody contradicts this I'll take it out in a couple of days.

1153:

Apologies: I know only a little about Günther Witzany, but how exactly is his work a reference for anything in this article, and what does his work have to do with "natural history" in the sense used here? I'm not saying it doesn't, I'm just trying to get clarification. -

1856:

I have removed the section which is copied below this comment, not because the idea of such a section is not relevant – I think it most certainly is – but because as written it consists almost entirely of two quotations from a single source, and so is not compatible with

1044:

I don't disagree with the sentiment, but saying that it "befits the increased understanding…" is the kind of expression of opinion that should not be in the narrative voice of a Knowledge (XXG) article. It would be great if you could cite someone authoritative

1708:

definition of the term 'natural history'; it has changed over time, and is used in different ways now. The lead paragraph needs to be re-written to match my changes – IF they are generally acceptable. I'd like some reactions please before doing anything more.

2299:

Greene, H.W. 1986. Natural history and evolutionary biology. Pp. 99-108 In Predator-Prey Relationships: Perspectives and Approaches from the Study of Lower Vertebrates. Feder, M.E. and G.V. Lauder (Eds). University of Chicago Press. Chicago, Illinois, USA.

2230:, natural history is the systematic study of any category of natural objects or organisms. That is a very broad designation in a world filled with many narrowly focused disciplines. So while natural history dates historically from studies in the ancient 1640:

I'm going to take out the image of the Denver museum, reluctantly as there's nothing much wrong with it, but it's no longer relevant (I can't include it as an example of a museum, since it's unclear whether it still houses the museum). Anyone with a

1307:

not part of environment, and objects to extending this same category scheme to the US state level--without saying where the natural history category should end up. What is correct? Where can this argument be justified by what is found in WP?

1760:

I've done some copy-editing on your contribution to fit it to WP style (e.g. punctuation before reference; no smart quotes). Generally I think it's a considerable improvement, although WP purists might think there are too many quotations (see

2217:

and televised nature programs provide popularized accounts of natural history that are presented in a manner similar to that used by early natural historians, but they are largely based on the scientific study. Programs such as those by

1217:

I've heard the term "geologic history" as well - is that a legitimate term? If so, what's its relation to "natural history"? Is one part of the other, or is one about rocks/soil/water while the other concerns plants/animals?

1067:

Rhode Island Natural History Survey (in the external links) seems a bit narrow and specific; the other links are mostly museums and societies that present/study natural history worldwide, not in one very small region. --

294: 2181:

such as the Journal of Wildlife Mangement, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, ichthyology and herpetology journals and regional outlets such as state academy journals and naturalist journals like the

1545:

I came back and merged the two paragraphs. In general, I think the description section repeats itself and rambles around the topic without always making clear points. It could probably stand some hard editing.

2263:

or "natural historian"; however, many scientists label themselves as organismic biologists, wildlife biologists, or life history biologists to distance themselves from the stigma of the early natural historians.

1207:" but does not other explain or expand on this. With this thin information, it is difficult to figure out what should be in 'natural history' categories and what should not be. Is there any help somewhere? 1010:

I know that high schools begin to specialize, with biology being its own subject, and maybe some of the other components of Natrural history also are being taught in narrow-focus classes. Be that as it may.

2122:

may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original

1413:

placing a category for a profession or organization members or award unless the article provides some verification that the placement is accurate." Nothing stated about looking elsewhere for categories.

2177:

is an important area of medical research. One can argue that the entire field of behavioral ecology is a branch of natural history. Many Natural history studies are published in a multitude of

1637:. This bordered on advertising. The museum didn't seem important enough to rate its own paragraph in an overview, and it already has an article, which is included in the aforementioned list. 2594: 2569: 2564: 329: 1287:

The lack of specific information in an article does not justify inaccurate categorization. Feel free to browse the external links section and look at books and papers off-line. —

1803: 2624: 319: 1799: 714: 1661:

A brief mention and description of some notable natural history museums, such as Natural History Museum in London or the Smithsonian could be nice (more than just a list)

1629:

I've removed a lot of the material from the section on natural history museums. One paragraph was essentially a list of these museums; I've linked to an article giving a

1366:

Is there any compromise here? If there are arguments for nesting category A within category B and B within A, should they perhaps be sister categories instead of nesting?

2644: 2318:

Bury, R.B. 2006. Natural history, field ecology, conservation biology and wildlife management: Time to connect the dots. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 1:56-61.

1014:

In any case, I think the article would be more inclusive and fleshed-out if there was something in it on how natural history continues to be woven into education. -J.R.

674: 2629: 623: 289: 2584: 984: 731: 2114:

text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of

739: 2689: 974: 2619: 2579: 2091: 2134:

for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators

2103: 2087: 1807: 857: 551: 437: 285: 276: 237: 94: 2599: 2388:

McCallum ML, McCallum, JL. 2006. Publication trends in natural history and field studies in herptology. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 1:62-68.

2344:

McCallum ML, McCallum, JL. 2006. Publication trends in natural history and field studies in herptology. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 1:62-68.

2281:

McCallum ML, McCallum, JL. 2006. Publication trends in natural history and field studies in herptology. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 1:62-68.

1865:

in using only one person as the source for the section. I hope some editor or editors can create a section which is in the proper Knowledge (XXG) style.

614: 214: 2674: 2639: 847: 427: 2480:

Thank you *very much* for your comments - and edit - yes - agreed - no problem whatsoever - Thanks again for your comments and all - and - Enjoy! :)

1090:. Perhaps one related link in this article would be appropriate, but the following, which I cut from the article, is excessive and amounted to spam. 950: 2659: 541: 640: 2609: 2589: 204: 735: 2684: 2679: 2664: 2649: 1021: 2142:

from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.

823: 2614: 2021: 1381: 923: 880: 180: 1662: 1634: 1482: 1724:

Additional point: both the original and my re-draft (which has attempted to clarify, NOT add new material) contain what appears to be

1338:

the opposite scheme is in place. This needs to be fixed. I can't see why you would want to "extend" an inaccurate category scheme. —

1335: 2063:

Also, it's funny that the image is of Buffon when he's not even discussed, while none of the great figures discussed are pictured...

932: 2669: 2634: 2374: 2332: 2654: 1451: 1389: 1385: 1330: 1324: 814: 772: 517: 504: 460: 403: 394: 352: 2604: 2574: 1795: 1630: 1250: 167: 128: 103: 2235: 1976: 1802:), and practically all of his edits have to do with Islamic science, technology and philosophy. This editor has persistently 284:

content on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the

649: 946: 1447: 918: 2139: 1253:, the terrestrial and ocean environment, climate, flora and fauna, and so on. This is one of the books I'm looking at: 62: 2199: 281: 58: 2223: 2170: 1704:

I have re-drafted the previous "Description" section, calling it "Definitions". It's quite clear that there isn't a

1454:

all cover this topic. Additionally, many Geography articles have natural history sections that cover this material.

2082:

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from:

1861:. If the long quotation is summarized, there really isn't enough left for a section. There's also an issue about 1254: 268: 2250:

has a strong multi-disciplinary nature combining scientists and scientific knowledge of many specialty sciences.

2094:, and elsewhere. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, 936: 2060:

about the great flowering of NH in that century, and biology should be mentioned with links to other articles.

1025: 2290:

Greene HW. 2005. Organisms in nature as a central focus for biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20:23-27.

2025: 1919:

institutions of higher learning "offer the courses and hire young professionals eager to do the right thing."

707: 633: 109: 2195: 2187: 2183: 1666: 1486: 2546: 2523: 2463: 2442: 2401: 2068: 2044: 1892: 1870: 1770: 1733: 1714: 1686: 1513: 2127: 2111: 2107: 1762: 1017: 940: 2191: 1443: 2203: 2099: 1858: 66: 2506: 2421: 2174: 1087: 564: 179:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1749: 2502: 1652: 1612: 1575: 1553: 1536: 1125: 1098: 939:

articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly

80: 1789: 1463: 1343: 1292: 1265: 1234: 928: 475: 454: 1745: 1642: 1586: 57:

is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other

2542: 2519: 2485: 2475: 2459: 2438: 2397: 2219: 2178: 2064: 2040: 1866: 1842: 1766: 1729: 1710: 1682: 1509: 911: 697: 662: 2130:

from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our

1725: 895: 874: 2353: 2371: 2329: 2231: 2147: 1985: 1973: 1819: 1594: 1529:

and it might have some other extras that I'm missing. I intend to come back and clean it up.

1111: 402:

resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the

1862: 2434: 2417: 2243: 2227: 2214: 1947: 1728:

because there isn't enough inline referencing. So I've added a 'reference improve' warning.

1219: 1186: 1159: 1140: 1073: 1054: 905: 20: 2131: 1374: 1370: 2413: 2002: 1969: 1648: 1608: 1571: 1549: 1532: 1439: 1380:

Is there a better place for this discussion? For example, I can imagine that the folks at

485: 33: 29: 1277:

article needs to be re-written and accepted by WP editors before anything else changes.

1107: 143: 122: 1888: 1785: 1459: 1339: 1288: 1261: 1230: 803: 689: 657: 645: 491: 383: 252: 231: 2558: 2481: 1838: 1798:) is one of the main contributors to Knowledge (XXG) (over 67,000 edits; he's ranked 723: 719: 159: 1359:. These are not leading to the same result. This leads to some questions in my mind: 398:, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use 2143: 1815: 1590: 1400: 1257: 377: 367: 346: 2309:

1993. What’s good about good natural history? Herpetological Natural History 1:3.

2098:

it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see

1938:

Paul K. Dayton (2003), "The Importance of the Natural Sciences to Conservation",

1837:

is misleading because that word is no more used in the modern German language. --

2239: 1810:. I searched the page history, and found 5 edits by Jagged 85 (for example, see 1414: 1308: 1278: 1246: 1208: 1204: 1182: 1155: 1136: 1069: 1050: 667: 2084:

Europe 1450 to 1789: encyclopedia of the early modern world, Volume 4, page 246

1121: 797: 2247: 901: 793: 481: 373: 258: 149: 1633:

at the start of the section. The other paragraph I've taken out was on the

2210: 2119: 1966:

Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder

1505: 653: 2550: 2527: 2510: 2489: 2467: 2446: 2425: 2416:, with care to avoid redundancy and to mesh with content already there. 2405: 2151: 2072: 2048: 2029: 1874: 1846: 1823: 1774: 1753: 1737: 1718: 1690: 1670: 1656: 1616: 1598: 1579: 1557: 1540: 1517: 1490: 1466: 1417: 1403: 1346: 1311: 1295: 1281: 1268: 1237: 1222: 1211: 1189: 1162: 1143: 1076: 1057: 1029: 2207: 2036: 1200: 819: 787: 766: 513: 399: 153: 1377:

for preferring the inside-looking over outside-looking, or visa versa?

602: 509: 176: 1951: 1116: 508:, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to 2368:

The New shorter Oxford English dictionary on historical principles

2242:

naturalists working in near isolation, today's field is more of a

1229:

I forgot to mention, yes, geologic history is a legitimate term. —

172: 1645:

of a natural history museum, please help illustrate the section.

1355:

WP for clues for the category system, while Viriditas is looking

1317:

In the context of Natural history of foo, Environment of foo is

74: 15: 1589:

and the like, but this is a pretty clear call, seems to me.

1181:

So, is this a quotation? And, if so, from where, exactly? -

818:, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to 288:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 2102:

if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or

1351:

I think what is happening here is that Hmains is looking

1177:

appropriately includes an esthetic component. S.G.Herman.

1811: 1585:

Nuke it. I could belabor the point with references to

1049:

this, but we can't say it ourselves in the article. --

590: 585: 580: 575: 1199:

The article says 'Natural history' includes "parts of

822:

on Knowledge (XXG). Leave messages on the WikiProject

171:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2259:A person who studies natural history is known as a 2246:umbrella of many specialty sciences. For example, 1852:Section on decline of natural history in education 2595:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles in History 2570:Knowledge (XXG) articles that use British English 2565:Knowledge (XXG) articles that use Oxford spelling 2328:doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543144.001.0001. 1763:Knowledge (XXG):Quotations#Overusing_quotations 2039:, but I agree could be added to this article. 1808:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Jagged 85 1524:Repetitive paragraphs in "Description" section 304:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject History of Science 1481:sound like someone who walks around naked? -- 927:to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of the 295:History of Science Collaboration of the Month 8: 1334:(1994). Currently, if you go to, let's say, 2625:Top-importance history of science articles 1015: 869: 761: 559: 449: 341: 226: 117: 2585:Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in History 1331:A Natural History of the Hawaiian Islands 280:, an attempt to improve and organize the 2645:High-importance C-Class Geology articles 1245:Natural history of Hawaii would discuss 636:into articles about endangered species. 2630:WikiProject History of Science articles 2274: 1930: 1883:Decline of Natural History in Education 1804:misused sources here over several years 1382:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Environment 959:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Environment 871: 763: 710:into articles about endangered species. 451: 343: 307:Template:WikiProject History of Science 228: 119: 78: 2580:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles 2453:Natural History vs the history of life 1998: 1994: 1983: 2226:are good examples. Grouped among the 2100:"using copyrighted works from others" 1172:The article includes this paragraph: 65:, this should not be changed without 7: 2690:High-importance Environment articles 1438:cover these topics. Articles like, 165:This article is within the scope of 2620:C-Class history of science articles 1635:Denver Museum of Nature and Science 1390:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biology 1386:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Ecology 832:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biology 526:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Animals 412:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Geology 108:It is of interest to the following 2536:Scientists/Definitions Subheadings 1336:Category:Environment of Costa Rica 732:Science collaboration of the month 516:. For more information, visit the 189:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Plants 14: 2600:C-Class vital articles in History 2088:Urtica: The genus Urtica. Page 15 740:WikiProject Animals Collaboration 2675:High-importance Biology articles 2640:High-importance Geology articles 2104:"donating copyrighted materials" 1452:Category:Natural history museums 962:Template:WikiProject Environment 947:Knowledge (XXG):Contributing FAQ 904: 894: 873: 796: 786: 765: 601: 484: 474: 453: 376: 366: 345: 261: 251: 230: 152: 142: 121: 88: 79: 19: 2660:High-importance animal articles 2224:Mutual of Omaha's Wild Kingdome 2171:the natural history of diseason 1631:list of natural history museums 1325:A Natural History of California 1251:evolution of Hawaiian volcanoes 1117:Ernest Thompson Seton Institute 979:This article has been rated as 852:This article has been rated as 546:This article has been rated as 432:This article has been rated as 324:This article has been rated as 209:This article has been rated as 2610:High-importance plant articles 2590:C-Class level-5 vital articles 2356:WordNet Search, princeton.edu. 1887:In July 2003 noted naturalist 1671:23:40, 24 September 2023 (UTC) 1496:You are confusing naturalist ( 1122:SETON'S SCIENTIFIC COLLECTIONS 1108:Works by Ernest Thompson Seton 1086:We already have an article on 949:and leave any messages at the 292:. You can also help with the 277:History of Science WikiProject 1: 2551:03:11, 6 September 2024 (UTC) 2518:Good catch. I've removed it. 2447:12:02, 21 February 2015 (UTC) 2426:01:17, 21 February 2015 (UTC) 2406:18:26, 20 February 2015 (UTC) 1738:12:42, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 1719:12:29, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 1691:12:23, 29 November 2009 (UTC) 1163:07:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC) 1077:05:29, 16 November 2005 (UTC) 650:Tool use by non-human animals 183:and see a list of open tasks. 2685:C-Class Environment articles 2680:WikiProject Biology articles 2665:WikiProject Animals articles 2650:WikiProject Geology articles 2490:22:10, 11 January 2016 (UTC) 2468:17:02, 11 January 2016 (UTC) 2073:10:55, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 1491:08:41, 12 October 2008 (UTC) 1450:, and the museums listed in 1448:Natural history of Australia 1144:00:34, 23 January 2006 (UTC) 1002:Natural History in Education 835:Template:WikiProject Biology 529:Template:WikiProject Animals 415:Template:WikiProject Geology 274:This article is part of the 2615:WikiProject Plants articles 2396:Help would be appreciated. 2213:, many popular articles in 2200:American Midland Naturalist 2049:10:38, 5 January 2012 (UTC) 2030:07:14, 5 January 2012 (UTC) 1875:21:08, 27 August 2011 (UTC) 1392:may care deeply about this. 310:history of science articles 192:Template:WikiProject Plants 2706: 2132:guideline on non-free text 2035:This is well-explained at 1847:09:29, 6 August 2011 (UTC) 1800:198 in the number of edits 1473:Naturalist (redirect here) 1030:06:08, 25 March 2005 (UTC) 985:project's importance scale 858:project's importance scale 552:project's importance scale 438:project's importance scale 330:project's importance scale 215:project's importance scale 2528:19:05, 31 July 2018 (UTC) 2511:18:58, 31 July 2018 (UTC) 2152:02:03, 25 July 2014 (UTC) 2078:Copyright problem removed 1824:15:33, 18 June 2010 (UTC) 1775:09:50, 14 June 2011 (UTC) 1754:12:18, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 1657:19:26, 10 July 2009 (UTC) 1599:20:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC) 1580:11:31, 30 June 2009 (UTC) 1558:11:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC) 1541:14:59, 29 June 2009 (UTC) 1467:22:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1404:15:36, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1369:Is there any guidance in 1347:11:53, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 1312:05:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 1296:03:35, 17 June 2007 (UTC) 1282:17:56, 15 June 2007 (UTC) 1269:12:36, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 1238:20:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 1223:20:38, 12 June 2007 (UTC) 1212:03:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC) 1190:08:21, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 1058:22:09, 16 July 2005 (UTC) 978: 889: 851: 781: 736:Article Improvement Drive 708:GLAM/ARKive donated texts 634:GLAM/ARKive donated texts 558: 545: 469: 431: 361: 323: 269:History of science portal 246: 208: 137: 116: 2670:C-Class Biology articles 2635:C-Class Geology articles 1617:20:29, 1 July 2009 (UTC) 1518:17:55, 30 May 2009 (UTC) 1418:16:31, 1 July 2007 (UTC) 2655:C-Class animal articles 2196:Northeastern Naturalist 2188:Southwestern Naturalist 2184:Southeastern Naturalist 1940:The American Naturalist 1893:The American Naturalist 1891:wrote the following in 1607:Binned it. Thank you! 1563:Natural History Network 1429:It is true that Hmains 1195:geology and climatology 924:WikiProject Environment 921:article is part of the 502:is within the scope of 2605:C-Class plant articles 2575:C-Class vital articles 2414:Natural_history#Modern 2370:, Oxford : Clarendon, 2366:Brown, Lesley (1993), 2238:, through to European 2236:mediaeval Arabic world 2192:Great Basin Naturalist 1964:Louv, Richard (2005), 1909: 1477:Is it just me or does 1444:Indian natural history 1179: 1097:Ernest Thompson Seton 931:. The aim is to write 2175:Natural history study 1904: 1174: 1088:Ernest Thompson Seton 1082:Ernest Thompson Seton 666:(a species in family 406:for more information. 102:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 95:level-5 vital article 1258:Chaco_Canyon#Geology 965:Environment articles 563:WikiProject Animals 390:Talk:Natural history 63:relevant style guide 59:varieties of English 2204:Maryland Naturalist 2118:, and according to 2110:, we cannot accept 1833:The link to German 919:environment-related 815:WikiProject Biology 505:WikiProject Animals 395:WikiProject Geology 61:. According to the 2220:David Attenborough 1302:Environment of foo 912:Environment portal 729:Nominate and vote: 698:Zaniolepis frenata 663:Sphaerium beckmani 301:History of Science 282:history of science 238:History of Science 168:WikiProject Plants 104:content assessment 2232:Greco-Roman world 2179:academic journals 2106:if you are.) For 2037:History#Etymology 1993:More than one of 1781:Misuse of sources 1112:Project Gutenberg 1032: 1020:comment added by 999: 998: 995: 994: 991: 990: 951:project talk page 868: 867: 864: 863: 760: 759: 756: 755: 752: 751: 748: 747: 448: 447: 444: 443: 340: 339: 336: 335: 225: 224: 221: 220: 73: 72: 2697: 2479: 2389: 2386: 2380: 2379: 2363: 2357: 2351: 2345: 2342: 2336: 2325: 2319: 2316: 2310: 2307: 2301: 2297: 2291: 2288: 2282: 2279: 2244:cross discipline 2228:natural sciences 2007: 2006: 2000: 1996: 1991: 1989: 1981: 1961: 1955: 1954: 1935: 1424:Reply to Hike395 967: 966: 963: 960: 957: 914: 909: 908: 898: 891: 890: 885: 877: 870: 840: 839: 838:Biology articles 836: 833: 830: 806: 801: 800: 790: 783: 782: 777: 769: 762: 605: 597: 596: 560: 534: 533: 530: 527: 524: 494: 489: 488: 478: 471: 470: 465: 457: 450: 420: 419: 418:Geology articles 416: 413: 410: 386: 381: 380: 370: 363: 362: 357: 349: 342: 312: 311: 308: 305: 302: 271: 266: 265: 264: 255: 248: 247: 242: 234: 227: 197: 196: 193: 190: 187: 162: 157: 156: 146: 139: 138: 133: 125: 118: 101: 92: 91: 84: 83: 75: 26:This article is 23: 16: 2705: 2704: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2555: 2554: 2538: 2498: 2473: 2455: 2418:--Animalparty-- 2394: 2393: 2392: 2387: 2383: 2377: 2365: 2364: 2360: 2354:Natural History 2352: 2348: 2343: 2339: 2326: 2322: 2317: 2313: 2308: 2304: 2298: 2294: 2289: 2285: 2280: 2276: 2159: 2080: 2057: 2017: 2012: 2011: 2010: 1992: 1982: 1979: 1970:Algonquin Books 1963: 1962: 1958: 1937: 1936: 1932: 1854: 1835:Naturgeschichte 1831: 1783: 1698: 1678: 1627: 1565: 1526: 1475: 1440:Natural history 1426: 1304: 1197: 1170: 1151: 1149:Günther Witzany 1084: 1065: 1038: 1022:207.194.162.171 1004: 981:High-importance 964: 961: 958: 955: 954: 937:well-referenced 910: 903: 884:High‑importance 883: 854:High-importance 837: 834: 831: 828: 827: 812:is part of the 810:Natural history 802: 795: 776:High‑importance 775: 744: 595: 548:High-importance 532:animal articles 531: 528: 525: 522: 521: 499:Natural history 490: 483: 464:High‑importance 463: 434:High-importance 417: 414: 411: 408: 407: 382: 375: 356:High‑importance 355: 309: 306: 303: 300: 299: 267: 262: 260: 240: 211:High-importance 194: 191: 188: 185: 184: 158: 151: 132:High‑importance 131: 99: 89: 67:broad consensus 34:Oxford spelling 30:British English 12: 11: 5: 2703: 2701: 2693: 2692: 2687: 2682: 2677: 2672: 2667: 2662: 2657: 2652: 2647: 2642: 2637: 2632: 2627: 2622: 2617: 2612: 2607: 2602: 2597: 2592: 2587: 2582: 2577: 2572: 2567: 2557: 2556: 2537: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2497: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2454: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2429: 2428: 2391: 2390: 2381: 2375: 2358: 2346: 2337: 2320: 2311: 2302: 2292: 2283: 2273: 2272: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2158: 2155: 2079: 2076: 2056: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2022:169.231.55.178 2016: 2013: 2009: 2008: 1977: 1956: 1952:10.1086/376572 1929: 1928: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1889:Paul K. Dayton 1885: 1853: 1850: 1830: 1827: 1782: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1741: 1740: 1697: 1694: 1677: 1674: 1626: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1602: 1601: 1564: 1561: 1525: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1474: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1455: 1425: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1394: 1393: 1378: 1367: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1303: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1196: 1193: 1169: 1166: 1150: 1147: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1104: 1103: 1083: 1080: 1064: 1061: 1037: 1034: 1003: 1000: 997: 996: 993: 992: 989: 988: 977: 971: 970: 968: 944: 916: 915: 899: 887: 886: 878: 866: 865: 862: 861: 850: 844: 843: 841: 808: 807: 804:Biology portal 791: 779: 778: 770: 758: 757: 754: 753: 750: 749: 746: 745: 743: 742: 726: 711: 702: 701: 700: 692: 690:Campocraspedon 687:Invertebrates: 684: 671: 658:Animal suicide 646:Photoperiodism 637: 628: 611:Here are some 610: 608: 606: 594: 593: 588: 583: 578: 572: 569: 568: 556: 555: 544: 538: 537: 535: 496: 495: 492:Animals portal 479: 467: 466: 458: 446: 445: 442: 441: 430: 424: 423: 421: 388: 387: 384:Geology portal 371: 359: 358: 350: 338: 337: 334: 333: 326:Top-importance 322: 316: 315: 313: 273: 272: 256: 244: 243: 241:Top‑importance 235: 223: 222: 219: 218: 207: 201: 200: 198: 195:plant articles 181:the discussion 164: 163: 147: 135: 134: 126: 114: 113: 107: 85: 71: 70: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2702: 2691: 2688: 2686: 2683: 2681: 2678: 2676: 2673: 2671: 2668: 2666: 2663: 2661: 2658: 2656: 2653: 2651: 2648: 2646: 2643: 2641: 2638: 2636: 2633: 2631: 2628: 2626: 2623: 2621: 2618: 2616: 2613: 2611: 2608: 2606: 2603: 2601: 2598: 2596: 2593: 2591: 2588: 2586: 2583: 2581: 2578: 2576: 2573: 2571: 2568: 2566: 2563: 2562: 2560: 2553: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2543:HikeMountains 2535: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2520:Chiswick Chap 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2508: 2504: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2477: 2476:Chiswick Chap 2472: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2460:Chiswick Chap 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2439:Peter coxhead 2436: 2431: 2430: 2427: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2398:Chiswick Chap 2385: 2382: 2378: 2376:0-19-861271-0 2373: 2369: 2362: 2359: 2355: 2350: 2347: 2341: 2338: 2334: 2333:9780199543144 2331: 2324: 2321: 2315: 2312: 2306: 2303: 2296: 2293: 2287: 2284: 2278: 2275: 2271: 2262: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2216: 2212: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2156: 2154: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2126: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2108:legal reasons 2105: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2077: 2075: 2074: 2070: 2066: 2065:Chiswick Chap 2061: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2041:Peter coxhead 2038: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2014: 2004: 1987: 1980: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1960: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1934: 1931: 1927: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1908: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1884: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1867:Peter coxhead 1864: 1860: 1851: 1849: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1828: 1826: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1794: 1791: 1787: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1767:Peter coxhead 1764: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1739: 1735: 1731: 1730:Peter coxhead 1727: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1711:Peter coxhead 1707: 1702: 1695: 1693: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1683:Peter coxhead 1675: 1673: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1663:24.244.23.245 1659: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1644: 1638: 1636: 1632: 1624: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1562: 1560: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1510:Alan Liefting 1507: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1483:80.223.57.250 1480: 1472: 1468: 1465: 1461: 1456: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1432: 1428: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1416: 1411: 1410: 1405: 1402: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1365: 1364: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1332: 1327: 1326: 1320: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1310: 1301: 1297: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1280: 1270: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1252: 1248: 1243: 1239: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1221: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1194: 1192: 1191: 1188: 1184: 1178: 1173: 1167: 1165: 1164: 1161: 1157: 1148: 1146: 1145: 1142: 1138: 1127: 1123: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1109: 1106: 1105: 1102: 1100: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1091: 1089: 1081: 1079: 1078: 1075: 1071: 1062: 1060: 1059: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1042: 1035: 1033: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1012: 1008: 1001: 986: 982: 976: 973: 972: 969: 952: 948: 942: 938: 934: 930: 926: 925: 920: 913: 907: 902: 900: 897: 893: 892: 888: 882: 879: 876: 872: 859: 855: 849: 846: 845: 842: 825: 821: 817: 816: 811: 805: 799: 794: 792: 789: 785: 784: 780: 774: 771: 768: 764: 741: 737: 733: 730: 727: 725: 724:Atka mackerel 721: 720:Junqueira cow 718: 716: 712: 709: 706: 703: 699: 696: 693: 691: 688: 685: 683: 680: 679: 678: 676: 672: 669: 665: 664: 659: 655: 651: 647: 644: 642: 638: 635: 632: 629: 627: 625: 621: 620: 618: 617: 616: 609: 607: 604: 599: 598: 592: 589: 587: 584: 582: 579: 577: 574: 573: 571: 570: 566: 562: 561: 557: 553: 549: 543: 540: 539: 536: 519: 515: 511: 507: 506: 501: 500: 493: 487: 482: 480: 477: 473: 472: 468: 462: 459: 456: 452: 439: 435: 429: 426: 425: 422: 405: 401: 397: 396: 391: 385: 379: 374: 372: 369: 365: 364: 360: 354: 351: 348: 344: 331: 327: 321: 318: 317: 314: 297: 296: 291: 287: 283: 279: 278: 270: 259: 257: 254: 250: 249: 245: 239: 236: 233: 229: 216: 212: 206: 203: 202: 199: 182: 178: 174: 170: 169: 161: 160:Plants portal 155: 150: 148: 145: 141: 140: 136: 130: 127: 124: 120: 115: 111: 105: 97: 96: 86: 82: 77: 76: 68: 64: 60: 56: 52: 48: 44: 40: 36: 35: 31: 25: 22: 18: 17: 2539: 2499: 2456: 2395: 2384: 2367: 2361: 2349: 2340: 2323: 2314: 2305: 2295: 2286: 2277: 2269: 2260: 2222:and the old 2160: 2157:New material 2135: 2124: 2115: 2095: 2081: 2062: 2058: 2055:19th Century 2018: 2015:Why history? 1965: 1959: 1943: 1939: 1933: 1925: 1905: 1882: 1859:WP:LONGQUOTE 1855: 1834: 1832: 1792: 1784: 1742: 1705: 1703: 1699: 1679: 1660: 1647: 1639: 1628: 1570: 1566: 1548: 1544: 1531: 1527: 1501: 1497: 1478: 1476: 1435: 1430: 1356: 1352: 1329: 1323: 1318: 1305: 1275: 1198: 1180: 1175: 1171: 1152: 1134: 1096: 1092: 1085: 1066: 1063:Rhode Island 1046: 1043: 1039: 1016:— Preceding 1013: 1009: 1005: 980: 922: 853: 813: 809: 728: 713: 704: 694: 686: 681: 673: 661: 639: 630: 622: 613: 612: 600: 547: 518:project page 503: 498: 497: 433: 404:project page 393: 389: 325: 293: 286:project page 275: 210: 166: 110:WikiProjects 93: 54: 53:; note that 50: 47:organization 46: 42: 38: 27: 2503:Chimneyrock 2435:Animalparty 2240:Renaissance 2116:information 2112:copyrighted 2001:specified ( 1696:Definitions 1328:(1995) and 1247:volcanology 1205:climatology 956:Environment 941:categorized 929:environment 881:Environment 668:Sphaeriidae 392:is part of 28:written in 2559:Categories 2437:suggests. 2270:References 2261:naturalist 2248:geobiology 2208:scientific 2128:plagiarize 1978:1565123913 1972:, p. 143, 1926:References 1649:Pertusaria 1643:good image 1609:Pertusaria 1572:Pertusaria 1550:Pertusaria 1533:Pertusaria 1479:naturalist 1458:instead. — 1168:Quotation? 615:Open Tasks 290:discussion 2541:section. 2496:Herschel? 2215:magazines 1829:Wikilinks 1812:this edit 1786:Jagged 85 1676:Societies 1587:WP:ADVERT 1460:Viriditas 1340:Viriditas 1289:Viriditas 1262:Viriditas 1231:Viriditas 824:talk page 98:is rated 2482:Drbogdan 2234:and the 2211:research 2120:fair use 1986:citation 1946:: 1–13, 1839:13Peewit 1796:contribs 1726:WP:SYNTH 1506:naturist 1399:Thanks! 1319:supposed 1126:PHILMONT 1099:Cimarron 1018:unsigned 682:Mammals: 675:Requests 654:Omnivore 624:Copyedit 2144:Diannaa 2140:blocked 1995:|pages= 1863:WP:NPOV 1816:Tobby72 1746:Tewksjj 1625:Museums 1591:Kingdon 1504:) with 1498:natural 1401:hike395 1357:outside 1201:geology 983:on the 933:neutral 856:on the 829:Biology 820:biology 773:Biology 695:Fishes: 641:Improve 581:history 550:on the 523:Animals 514:zoology 510:animals 461:Animals 436:on the 409:Geology 400:geology 353:Geology 328:on the 213:on the 100:C-class 51:analyse 43:realize 2202:, and 2096:unless 1999:|page= 1706:single 1500:scient 1431:claims 1415:Hmains 1375:WP:MOS 1371:WP:CAT 1353:inside 1309:Hmains 1279:Hmains 1249:, the 1209:Hmains 1183:Jmabel 1156:Jmabel 1137:Jmabel 1101:Museum 1070:Jmabel 1051:Jmabel 1047:saying 715:Expand 705:Merge: 631:Merge: 186:Plants 177:botany 173:plants 129:Plants 106:scale. 39:colour 1508:. -- 945:Read 917:This 591:purge 586:watch 565:To-do 87:This 32:with 2547:talk 2524:talk 2507:talk 2486:talk 2464:talk 2443:talk 2422:talk 2402:talk 2372:ISBN 2330:ISBN 2148:talk 2136:will 2092:here 2069:talk 2045:talk 2026:talk 2003:help 1997:and 1974:ISBN 1871:talk 1843:talk 1820:talk 1790:talk 1771:talk 1750:talk 1734:talk 1715:talk 1687:talk 1667:talk 1653:talk 1613:talk 1595:talk 1576:talk 1554:talk 1537:talk 1516:) - 1514:talk 1487:talk 1464:Talk 1344:Talk 1293:Talk 1266:Talk 1235:Talk 1220:Pete 1203:and 1187:Talk 1160:Talk 1141:Talk 1074:Talk 1055:Talk 1026:talk 975:High 935:and 848:High 576:edit 542:High 512:and 428:High 205:High 175:and 55:-ize 2138:be 1948:doi 1944:162 1814:). 1765:). 1756:). 1502:ist 1388:or 1384:or 1373:or 1260:. — 1124:AT 1110:at 1036:POV 670:), 320:Top 2561:: 2549:) 2526:) 2509:) 2488:) 2466:) 2445:) 2424:) 2404:) 2198:, 2194:, 2190:, 2186:, 2173:. 2150:) 2125:or 2090:, 2086:, 2071:) 2047:) 2028:) 1990:: 1988:}} 1984:{{ 1968:, 1942:, 1873:) 1845:) 1822:) 1773:) 1752:) 1736:) 1717:) 1689:) 1669:) 1655:) 1615:) 1597:) 1578:) 1556:) 1539:) 1489:) 1462:| 1446:, 1442:, 1436:do 1342:| 1291:| 1264:| 1233:| 1185:| 1158:| 1139:| 1135:- 1072:| 1053:| 1028:) 738:, 734:, 722:, 660:, 656:, 652:, 648:, 49:, 45:, 41:, 2545:( 2522:( 2505:( 2484:( 2478:: 2474:@ 2462:( 2441:( 2420:( 2400:( 2335:. 2146:( 2067:( 2043:( 2024:( 2005:) 1950:: 1895:: 1869:( 1841:( 1818:( 1793:· 1788:( 1769:( 1748:( 1732:( 1713:( 1685:( 1665:( 1651:( 1611:( 1593:( 1574:( 1552:( 1535:( 1512:( 1485:( 1218:- 1024:( 987:. 953:. 943:. 860:. 826:. 717:: 677:: 643:: 626:: 619:: 567:: 554:. 520:. 440:. 332:. 298:. 217:. 112:: 69:. 37:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index